I have 2 x ati radeon 4870. but i want 2 x ati radeon 4870x2. I have 750 watts of power. Can is just remove the 4870 and replace it with 4870x2 Or do i need some extra things in order to install it properly? HELP PLEASE :(
@Sieberliebangbang i think that should be enough since the amds website says you need 600 watt psu for crossfire...lol i ran 2 6970s with a 750 and it was ok :P
I got a 3870x2 and a gts250 and they are around the same performance wise. im keeping the 3870x2 though! cause i can't control the fan speed on the gts250.
what is hoover? LOL u mean it takes alot of power? The 3870x2 has high power consumption i think cause i put 1x 6 pin and 1x 8 pin in it to power it. and another thing my psu is thermaltake only 430 watts works fine. also the gts250 has only a 1x6pin
I got a 3870x2 and a gts250 and they are around the same performance wise. im keeping the 3870x2 though! cause i can't control the fan speed on the gts250.
@has22fas Seems to be true, but there's not that big difference between 9800GTX and GT, you sure that the 9800GT is as fast as an 8800GT?
And the HD 3870 seems to be as fast as a HD 5670, because in test with same processor, same RAM and same OS, there's nearly no difference between these two. So a HD 5670 is slower than a 9800GTX or a HD 5670? Sounds strange :P
I hate the fact that my GPU is not that powerful. But then Again i am using a Pentium 4 XD. Which surprisingly can run any game. Except a few like GTA4 and Prototype. I mean it even runs Crysis just fine.
dude the 3870x2 is less powerful than the 4870 normal by like 10-20%. A 4870x2 will be more than 2 times powerful than the 3870x2. Nearly 2 and a half.
Saab küll panna. Aga soovitaks uuemaid kaarte oodata ja siis kasvõi mõni 4000 seeria kaart võileiva hinnaga osta... crossfire ei tööta 100% mitte kuskil, mõnedes kohtades saad veel halvemat FPS-i Crossfirega kui ilma, enamikes mängudes on jõudluse kasv crossfirega 30-40%...
kas sa nvidia kvaliteeti oled näinud? see on nii kohutav et syda läheb pahax. i tell something about nvidia if fraps show 50 fps then u see actually 20 or less this is actually cheating , I tested and nvidia cards cant oc couse these burn down , ati can play with 90 c and no problems. nvidia die near 70c . and why is nvidia still in stone age?? still DDR3 and DX10.0, and no support video IN.. how u nvidia fans can say that nvidia is better than ATI??? ATI was, is and will stay on top
i will correct you, NVIDIA was the company far ahead of ATI, there was no competition, ati came back to compete with NVIDIA. they always bring out a better card, NVIDIA cards OC better, thats it!!!
ATi is a lot older than nVidia. Back in 2003-2005 ATi cards were a lot faster than nVidia's (Radeon 2000 series VS GeForce 7000 series). But when GF 8000 series came out in 2006 ATi fell a little bit behind in performance. If they get their DX11 cards out before nVidia the same thing that was in 2004 will recur.
A bit? Nvidia were in a class of their own with the 8 series. Albeit the 9 series, ATi caught up and now they are essentially tied with ATi JUST ahead with the 4890.
Yes, a bit, because Radeon 2000 series had DX10 support also like 8000 series, 3000 series were disappointing so they fell a little bit behind, 4000 series were a nice comeback...
ATi will get their 5000 series (DX11 cards) out before nVidia gets GT300 so they'll go away with the performance for some months, GT 300 will probably be faster.
Im next going to get two GT300 cards in SLi, just because they run F@H a lot faster than ATi and this is what I basically do with my computer...
I've always had great experiences with ATi cards, drivers are stable and optimised, awesome performance in games and benchmarks.
Had three ATi cards. All performed terribly in games which they should gobble up. All have given me a BSOD. Maybe it's a fluke but there is no way I am going to fund business practices like that.
GT 300 will cost probably about 500-600$ per card when they come out. GTX 275 won't be ancient as soon as it can play everything with maximum settings (can max the settings out, doesn't mean smooth framerate...).
tervitused, ole hää ja testi vahepeaö uhte vanat mängu nagu flight sim. delux olex tore kui max resu ja muud sodid kaa peal. täis full ja proofi frapsga salvestada saab parema kvaliteediga pilti nautida, ma yritan nvidia 8800 gt-ga ja isegi defoult seadistusega ei saa mängida.. esitex ei näea sealt midagi ja teisex on kaader alla 20 .
GTX 285 SLi is definately faster than one 4870 X2. I'd recommend you to stay with two 285's because quad crossfire doesn't scale very well in most applications.
GTX 285 SLi can not have lower FPS in Crysis compared to 4870 X2, they should have about double. Do you have SLi bridge connected correctly? Did you enabled SLi after SLi-ing the cards? What OS are you using?
Windows7 looks nice^.^ might get it hehe.ermm but the fps i got it for the setting s ihave told u earlier on is abt 22fps avg is it suppose to have such diff?O.O on high 32bitcrysis dx9 4xaa and 1680x1050
Yes, you should be getting about 5 times more FPS than 22 on these settings. Best would be if you do a clean install of Windows 7 64bit and install the latest motherboard and graphics drivers.
Yeahs!^.^ ermm thx for helping me out agn^.^ ermm jus curious are u changing to windows7? i heard that is is almost the same as xp but faster than vista^.^
I'm going to change to Win 7 when it's offically released (full version). When using a high-end system there's not much difference between the speeds of Vista and 7... in games there's basically no difference in FPS, same with benchmarks.
but windows 7 wont be as bad as vista rite?O.o ermm what i meant was when vista 1st came out it kept crashing and there are quite alot of problems with it.
oh yeahs i fgt to tell u that i have the gtx825 1gb version. not the 2 gb version so will i still get the 5times performance if i use vista or win7 64bit?o.O
It only seems that way because there are two types of enthusiasts: The gamer, who enjoys playing the game and plays for fun, and the Overclocker/Benchmarker, who buys all of the best tech and pushes it as far as it can go because it is their hobby. The difference is, the gamers just play their games and enjoy them, where as the benchmarker tries to get as many frames as possible, and because of this diff, gamers don't need to put up youtube vids, but to the benchmarkers, yt is a proving ground.
Hmm, strange problem. Did you install all the important motherboard drivers correctly? Also make sure that your Catalyst Control Center is running on Advanced.
hi ermm do u have any anti virus software(Example like norton antivirus) that u can recomend to me? something that u have tried before and its very good.
I don't know much about this kind if things (software), i'm currently using the 90 day trial version of norton antivirus that came with my OS (Vista Ultimate x64).
No, if the response time is smaller it's better (2ms is currently the best). Refresh rate is good until it's 60hz+, human eye can't see over 60 FPS anyways (hz shows basically how many FPS the monitor can display.)
ok i now know wads physx but cant why do ppl wan to use another gpu rather then using the gaming GPU for physx. an example: some1 has a 3pcie x16 mobo and he is using sli for his 2 gtx280 and another gtx260 for his physx. can anyone tell me why mus we have another gpu for physx??O.O
The spearated PhysX card will give better performance in games that support PhysX. Other card(s) would be used to run the game and the PhysX card would be used to do physX calculations.
must the seperated physx card be only one card? or can it be on sli mode? and must the seperated card be good for better physx performance? and can all 3 cards be gtx 280 and one of the is used for physx?
Yes all 3 cards can be GTX 280's and one can be for PhysX. You can run only one card for PhysX (not SLi), even a 8600 GT is enough to run PhysX, 9600/8800/9800 GT would be a waste.
oic.. i am so happy and grateful for helping me out so many times. if i am not wrong last year at around nov u had helped me on the $1600 USD $2.2k SGD gaming rig but i did not choose dat as it is over my budget and i had chosen a temp com first.. but i may be changing to core i7 by this month MAYBE!. LAST of all THX for helping me out so much! =D
Ati Radeon 4870 X2 is 3D King this bitch Runz This Shit
XxLmBxPr0j3cTx118xX 3 months ago
I have 2 x ati radeon 4870. but i want 2 x ati radeon 4870x2. I have 750 watts of power. Can is just remove the 4870 and replace it with 4870x2 Or do i need some extra things in order to install it properly? HELP PLEASE :(
Sieberliebangbang 1 year ago
@Sieberliebangbang - You need to have a good enough power supply to run two 4870 X2s.
arvutihull 1 year ago
@arvutihull I have max 750 watt power suply. is taht ebough?
Sieberliebangbang 1 year ago
@Sieberliebangbang - No.
arvutihull 1 year ago
@arvutihull how about a 1200 watt?
Seabound07 11 months ago
@Seabound07 - Probably enough but if you tell me what 1200W PSU it is exactly I can say if it is enough or not.
arvutihull 11 months ago
@arvutihull wtf you talking about 700 wat PSU is more than enough
gazzxr 10 months ago
@gazzxr - No it is not enough.
arvutihull 10 months ago
@arvutihull would this card beat a hd6970?
gabrocki 10 months ago
@gabrocki - No, 6970 is faster.
arvutihull 10 months ago
@arvutihull uhh... aaaand a 6870?:D
gabrocki 10 months ago
@gabrocki - 4870 X2 is faster than 6870, no DX11 though.
arvutihull 10 months ago 3
@arvutihull yeah i know. illl get a DX11 card, i was just wondering... thanks!
gabrocki 10 months ago
@Sieberliebangbang i think that should be enough since the amds website says you need 600 watt psu for crossfire...lol i ran 2 6970s with a 750 and it was ok :P
temna11 1 year ago
@Sieberliebangbang It could be tbh depends what else you've got attached to your motherboard.
MidKniqhtx 1 year ago
si old
Otto10k 1 year ago
thats a noisy sumbitch!!!!!
camj2116 1 year ago
I got a 3870x2 and a gts250 and they are around the same performance wise. im keeping the 3870x2 though! cause i can't control the fan speed on the gts250.
ozpc123 2 years ago
@ozpc123
Really? The X2 cards have always been hoovers from what I've heard? Plus the 250 takes way less power :)
TSSdrifting 2 years ago
what is hoover? LOL u mean it takes alot of power? The 3870x2 has high power consumption i think cause i put 1x 6 pin and 1x 8 pin in it to power it. and another thing my psu is thermaltake only 430 watts works fine. also the gts250 has only a 1x6pin
ozpc123 2 years ago
@ozpc123
Nah I meant ridiculously noisy, as well running a lot hotter than the 250.
TSSdrifting 2 years ago
I See what you mean, but I solved this problem with riva tuner.
ozpc123 2 years ago
I got a 3870x2 and a gts250 and they are around the same performance wise. im keeping the 3870x2 though! cause i can't control the fan speed on the gts250.
ozpc123 2 years ago
4890 :D
detroid89 2 years ago
Is the 3870x2 better than the Nvidia GTX260??
johnie1992 2 years ago
GTX 260 is faster.
arvutihull 2 years ago
Yea but why?
I mean the 3870x2 has 2 faster GPUs, more and faster VRam, it supports DX 10.1 .....
What makes the GTX260 faster??
Also is the 3870x2 better than my card, the 9800GTX ??
Thanks :)
johnie1992 2 years ago
3870 X2 and 9800 GTX are about the same. nVidia has different arhitecture. GTX 260 is also a lot newer card than 3870 X2.
arvutihull 2 years ago
lol
3870x2 & 9800gtx are not the same
3870x2 > 4850 > 9800gtx
the gtx260 would be better than a 3870x2, but at the gtx260 price point your better off grabbing a 4870, higher fps on most games
MrOhthatiswhackk 2 years ago
GTX 260 is faster than 3870 X2. 3870 X2 and 9800 GTX have pretty much the same performance in applications that support crossfire.
arvutihull 2 years ago
hd 3870 is as fast as a 9800GTX (tested)
hd 3870 x2 should be much faster
Spandl 2 years ago
right
johnie1992 2 years ago
@Spandl Wrong HD3870~HD4830= 8800GT~9800GT
9800GTX= HD4850
HD4870= GTX 260
There are a few frame rate differents between cards but its as close as it gets
has22fas 1 year ago
@has22fas Seems to be true, but there's not that big difference between 9800GTX and GT, you sure that the 9800GT is as fast as an 8800GT?
And the HD 3870 seems to be as fast as a HD 5670, because in test with same processor, same RAM and same OS, there's nearly no difference between these two. So a HD 5670 is slower than a 9800GTX or a HD 5670? Sounds strange :P
Spandl 1 year ago
@has22fas eh HD 5670 slower than a 9800GTX and HD 4850 I mean^^
Spandl 1 year ago
@Spandl Correct the HD4850 is same as HD5750.
The HD5670~HD4830~HD3870=9800GT~8800GT
9800gt is a 8800GT with a smaller die only 2fps or no fps difference hope this helps
has22fas 1 year ago
is hd 4890 faster than hd 4870x2?
Joaovitordecezaro 2 years ago
No.
arvutihull 2 years ago
@arvutihull - Only in games/benchmarks where Crossfire isn't supported.
arvutihull 1 year ago
but i got a 3870x2 for £50, whic is 3x cheaper then a GTX260,
get a 4890
1337ASM 2 years ago 2
@johnie1992 no
AggroDog2 2 years ago
I hate the fact that my GPU is not that powerful. But then Again i am using a Pentium 4 XD. Which surprisingly can run any game. Except a few like GTA4 and Prototype. I mean it even runs Crysis just fine.
pirosoffaireyes 2 years ago
dude the 3870x2 is less powerful than the 4870 normal by like 10-20%. A 4870x2 will be more than 2 times powerful than the 3870x2. Nearly 2 and a half.
pirosoffaireyes 2 years ago
This video showed exactly how big the difference between 3870 X2 and 4870 X2 is.
arvutihull 2 years ago
wow man,u got the right PC to play game and im jelous..Need to buy a PC like your,,,
can u give me a details about your PC systems more?
mosiang78 2 years ago
oh no.. i need to upgrade my 3870 X2!!
bmathers21 2 years ago
so who won ? wth !
467SHARPSHOOTER 2 years ago
4870 X2... of course... the point is not to show which is faster, the point is to show how much faster 4870 X2 is than 3870 X2.
arvutihull 2 years ago
is ur monitor 3d???
Kostas7117 2 years ago
No.
arvutihull 2 years ago
i got the 4870 x2 card nice card
Diss24 2 years ago
where is the comparison??
Zico10101010 2 years ago
The video is a comparison.
arvutihull 2 years ago
didn't mean i would say 4870x2 DEFEAT the 3870 x2 ther is no comparison i am not silly
Zico10101010 2 years ago
If you don't see the point of this video it's your own problem.
arvutihull 2 years ago
what did you mean?
Zico10101010 2 years ago
3870 gpu was a failure
Danc3AllDayy 2 years ago
got same game and passed that level nice card man .☺☺☺☺
alltimegamer247 2 years ago
Thanks!
arvutihull 2 years ago
i am thinking of getting a 48700 aas an upgrade from my 3870
TheMacHack 2 years ago
COOL
Zico10101010 2 years ago
i mean 4870 :)
TheMacHack 2 years ago
kas ati hd 3850 saab crossfire panna?,mul on 1 ati hd 3850
retry9 2 years ago
Saab küll panna. Aga soovitaks uuemaid kaarte oodata ja siis kasvõi mõni 4000 seeria kaart võileiva hinnaga osta... crossfire ei tööta 100% mitte kuskil, mõnedes kohtades saad veel halvemat FPS-i Crossfirega kui ilma, enamikes mängudes on jõudluse kasv crossfirega 30-40%...
arvutihull 2 years ago
ma isegi ei tea kas mul pci express ,pci,v6i agp,kuidas ma saan kindlalt teada milline mul on?
retry9 2 years ago
Kõige lihtsam on tõmmata programm nimega GPU-Z ning seal on ''bus interface'' taga kirjas mis ta on.
arvutihull 2 years ago
thx,sain teada see on pcie 16x aga seal all ytleb et ati crossfire disabled :S
retry9 2 years ago
Ütleb muidugi, sul on ju üks kaart :-)
arvutihull 2 years ago
kas sa nvidia kvaliteeti oled näinud? see on nii kohutav et syda läheb pahax. i tell something about nvidia if fraps show 50 fps then u see actually 20 or less this is actually cheating , I tested and nvidia cards cant oc couse these burn down , ati can play with 90 c and no problems. nvidia die near 70c . and why is nvidia still in stone age?? still DDR3 and DX10.0, and no support video IN.. how u nvidia fans can say that nvidia is better than ATI??? ATI was, is and will stay on top
HDGURU100 2 years ago
i will correct you, NVIDIA was the company far ahead of ATI, there was no competition, ati came back to compete with NVIDIA. they always bring out a better card, NVIDIA cards OC better, thats it!!!
hellobooom 2 years ago
ATi is a lot older than nVidia. Back in 2003-2005 ATi cards were a lot faster than nVidia's (Radeon 2000 series VS GeForce 7000 series). But when GF 8000 series came out in 2006 ATi fell a little bit behind in performance. If they get their DX11 cards out before nVidia the same thing that was in 2004 will recur.
arvutihull 2 years ago
A bit? Nvidia were in a class of their own with the 8 series. Albeit the 9 series, ATi caught up and now they are essentially tied with ATi JUST ahead with the 4890.
LessthanJake14 2 years ago
Yes, a bit, because Radeon 2000 series had DX10 support also like 8000 series, 3000 series were disappointing so they fell a little bit behind, 4000 series were a nice comeback...
arvutihull 2 years ago
Yes, but 8000 vs. 3000, the Nvidia always came out on top. 4000 series was indeed a nice comeback just like 9000 was a bit bad.
I do hope Nvidia pull something out of their hats with the 300 series; had bad experience with ATi and don't ever want to return.
LessthanJake14 2 years ago
ATi will get their 5000 series (DX11 cards) out before nVidia gets GT300 so they'll go away with the performance for some months, GT 300 will probably be faster.
Im next going to get two GT300 cards in SLi, just because they run F@H a lot faster than ATi and this is what I basically do with my computer...
I've always had great experiences with ATi cards, drivers are stable and optimised, awesome performance in games and benchmarks.
arvutihull 2 years ago
Had three ATi cards. All performed terribly in games which they should gobble up. All have given me a BSOD. Maybe it's a fluke but there is no way I am going to fund business practices like that.
LessthanJake14 2 years ago
how much will gt300 be plz?
and will the gtx275 be ancient anytime soon
AdiF50Ronaldo7 2 years ago
GT 300 will cost probably about 500-600$ per card when they come out. GTX 275 won't be ancient as soon as it can play everything with maximum settings (can max the settings out, doesn't mean smooth framerate...).
arvutihull 2 years ago
9000 series was complete trash a knock off of 8000 series
roshawn1111 2 years ago
tervitused, ole hää ja testi vahepeaö uhte vanat mängu nagu flight sim. delux olex tore kui max resu ja muud sodid kaa peal. täis full ja proofi frapsga salvestada saab parema kvaliteediga pilti nautida, ma yritan nvidia 8800 gt-ga ja isegi defoult seadistusega ei saa mängida.. esitex ei näea sealt midagi ja teisex on kaader alla 20 .
HDGURU100 2 years ago
How do you make those white information on top of screen
ALEXK1235 2 years ago
It's included in the benchmark.
arvutihull 2 years ago
Haven't played that game in awhile but I think u just type /show info in the command screen (~) or type help or commands in ~
CaliSurferzz 2 years ago
Oh! it is. Damn on my low end Pc looks horrible.
YohZiAddison 2 years ago
Is that Crysis Warhead?
YohZiAddison 2 years ago
Yes.
arvutihull 2 years ago
u lucky
YohZiAddison 2 years ago
lol
arvutihull 2 years ago
DAMN DAMN DAMN. I HAVE HD 2400 XT onboard. Bought it on End of 2008 FOR Christmas present. Damn. My fucking uncle is a stupid noob. JESUS.
YohZiAddison 2 years ago
lol
Pringlesplox 2 years ago
Damn.... but at least I can play GTA San Andreas!! hahaha!
YohZiAddison 2 years ago
5870x2 this disember 2009..coming soon
5870 this octorber 2009..
directx11.........
shadowsharpshooter 2 years ago
WOW! 5870 or X2 beat GTX 295
YohZiAddison 2 years ago
yes..i get this in formation from ATI Technologies - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia..HD5870 have directx11..and 5870x2 same too..
but i still use Gecube HD3870 over clocking limited Edition crossfire with Saphire HD3870
nice performance,,i can play all game in high setting like crysis in FULL HD 23" LCD..
shadowsharpshooter 2 years ago
Hi, ermm i decided to change to ati and i wonder if 1 4870x2 can beat TWO GTX285 in SLI.
And i am thinking of selling two of my ASUS GTX285 and buy Two Sapphire 4870x2 by adding about 100USD
What do u think abt this?O.O
chesterlim15 2 years ago
GTX 285 SLi is definately faster than one 4870 X2. I'd recommend you to stay with two 285's because quad crossfire doesn't scale very well in most applications.
arvutihull 2 years ago
oic.. but i am wondering if 2 4870 x2 is faster than gtx285 in sli?O.O cus the price is ALMOST the same in my country
chesterlim15 2 years ago
Yes they're faster but not in games, in most games SLi scales better.
arvutihull 2 years ago
oic.. i am still not sure if i wan2 sell 2 of my gtx 285 and buy 2 4870x2 or to sell 2 of my gtx285 and to buy a gtx295 Or to keep both of my gtx285
chesterlim15 2 years ago
The smartest thing that you could do is that you keep your 285's. They should be more than enough to run all games at maximum settings with 60FPS+.
arvutihull 2 years ago
oic.. ermm cus my gtx285 in sli have lower fps compared to ur 4870x2 in crysis.
chesterlim15 2 years ago
GTX 285 SLi can not have lower FPS in Crysis compared to 4870 X2, they should have about double. Do you have SLi bridge connected correctly? Did you enabled SLi after SLi-ing the cards? What OS are you using?
arvutihull 2 years ago
xp64bit. but running crysis on 32bit dx9 settings on high and 1680x1050 aa 4x i did enable sli
chesterlim15 2 years ago
Driver support for XP 64bit has always been bad, I'd recommend you to get Vista 64bit or Windows 7.
arvutihull 2 years ago
Windows7 looks nice^.^ might get it hehe.ermm but the fps i got it for the setting s ihave told u earlier on is abt 22fps avg is it suppose to have such diff?O.O on high 32bitcrysis dx9 4xaa and 1680x1050
chesterlim15 2 years ago
Yes, you should be getting about 5 times more FPS than 22 on these settings. Best would be if you do a clean install of Windows 7 64bit and install the latest motherboard and graphics drivers.
arvutihull 2 years ago
Yeahs!^.^ ermm thx for helping me out agn^.^ ermm jus curious are u changing to windows7? i heard that is is almost the same as xp but faster than vista^.^
chesterlim15 2 years ago
I'm going to change to Win 7 when it's offically released (full version). When using a high-end system there's not much difference between the speeds of Vista and 7... in games there's basically no difference in FPS, same with benchmarks.
arvutihull 2 years ago
but windows 7 wont be as bad as vista rite?O.o ermm what i meant was when vista 1st came out it kept crashing and there are quite alot of problems with it.
chesterlim15 2 years ago
Yes probably the 7 will be better... at the moment Vista has got a lot of updates (and SP2) and it's not crashing anymore, at least for me...
arvutihull 2 years ago
Okie thx alot ^.^ byebye
chesterlim15 2 years ago
oh yeahs i fgt to tell u that i have the gtx825 1gb version. not the 2 gb version so will i still get the 5times performance if i use vista or win7 64bit?o.O
chesterlim15 2 years ago
Yes, you should.
arvutihull 2 years ago
k, thx
chesterlim15 2 years ago
3870x2 is just faster than the 4850...
hellobooom 2 years ago
Yes, a little bit.
arvutihull 2 years ago
4850 likes AA more.
arvutihull 2 years ago
hi this guy downloaded ur i7920 unboxing video and uploaded it on his channel his name is nabilzi7
chesterlim15 2 years ago
Thanks for telling me!! Flaged it.
arvutihull 2 years ago
i feel sad for him xd
yosefmashadani 2 years ago 2
4870x2 = amazing card best purchase ive made in a few years gpu wise
3870x2 = descent bought it before obviously had micro stutter issues though dunno why anyways great vid dude nice thought comparing them on crysis =]
DarianXsXCrans 2 years ago
How does this match up to the nvidia 280?
Janjubie 2 years ago
it's better than two of them in SLI
[4870 X2]
JPMaxx15 2 years ago
GTX 280 is much faster than 3870 X2 and about 20-40% slower than 4870 X2.
arvutihull 2 years ago
is it me or people today doesn't enjoy the games but instead enjoys looking at the frames rates they are getting ?
crumcon 2 years ago 8
Yes, people who enjoy looking at the framerates are called overclockers and benchmarkers :-)
arvutihull 2 years ago
yeah your right about that damn the frames just have fun.
Logan800 2 years ago 2
It only seems that way because there are two types of enthusiasts: The gamer, who enjoys playing the game and plays for fun, and the Overclocker/Benchmarker, who buys all of the best tech and pushes it as far as it can go because it is their hobby. The difference is, the gamers just play their games and enjoy them, where as the benchmarker tries to get as many frames as possible, and because of this diff, gamers don't need to put up youtube vids, but to the benchmarkers, yt is a proving ground.
meatwad53186 2 years ago 2
WHAT IS THE SCORE OUT OF? 20,000?
sk8rdude985 2 years ago
I have a core i7 and a HD 3870 X2 but only 15-20 fps on Graphic Gamer and i dont know why?
pumpy212 2 years ago
Do you have the latest graphics drivers?
arvutihull 2 years ago
Yes 9.4
pumpy212 2 years ago
Hmm, strange problem. Did you install all the important motherboard drivers correctly? Also make sure that your Catalyst Control Center is running on Advanced.
arvutihull 2 years ago
Yes my pc is brand new
Asus Rampage II Extreme
Core i7
6 gb ddr3 ram
HD 3870 x2 (but i update now)
pumpy212 2 years ago
Awesome. Rampage 2 Extreme may need a BIOS update to perform best but I don't think that it's the problem...
arvutihull 2 years ago
I have another problem when i activating the auto-overclock i have over 100 % more fps but after 5 min i have a bluescreen. :(
pumpy212 2 years ago
Then probably the CPU was running at too high speed. Check your CPU core clock and voltage with CPU-Z.
arvutihull 2 years ago
no it's the standart clock but it's 2.78 ghz
pumpy212 2 years ago
If it's on 2,78GHz then probably just the speedstep is enabled. What's the multiplier?
arvutihull 2 years ago
fuck I need a new monitor !!!
IhaveGreenPaper 2 years ago
hi ermm do u have any anti virus software(Example like norton antivirus) that u can recomend to me? something that u have tried before and its very good.
chesterlim15 2 years ago
I don't know much about this kind if things (software), i'm currently using the 90 day trial version of norton antivirus that came with my OS (Vista Ultimate x64).
arvutihull 2 years ago
hi, i saw this on ur channel Acer 22 inch 60hz LCD 1680x1050 5ms(wad is ms? and wad is 60hz?
chesterlim15 2 years ago
Ms is response time, 60hz is refresh rate.
arvutihull 2 years ago
so if the response time is higher it will be better? and if the hz is higher it will oso be better?
chesterlim15 2 years ago
No, if the response time is smaller it's better (2ms is currently the best). Refresh rate is good until it's 60hz+, human eye can't see over 60 FPS anyways (hz shows basically how many FPS the monitor can display.)
arvutihull 2 years ago
Windows live Onecare... it's cheap ($30 for 3 1 year subs at walmart), and as long as you're not a total moron you won't get viruses.
mrfuzzums3163 2 years ago
How do you run the differen't benchmarks in Crysis? I only know how to run Island or w/e is standard.
acdc93312 2 years ago
You maybe have the Crysis benchmarking tool, not the warhead benchmarking tool.
arvutihull 2 years ago
ermm hi. why do some GPU have GFX behind their name?
chesterlim15 2 years ago
Hey. What's GFX?
arvutihull 2 years ago
nt sure
chesterlim15 2 years ago
It means graphics (an acronym).
firestormcomputers 2 years ago
Thanks for clearing that up.
arvutihull 2 years ago
No problem.
firestormcomputers 2 years ago
Oh, your right....I guess I need to get Crysis Warhead =]
acdc93312 2 years ago
Ermm so which one is better? 4870x2 or 3780x2? cus i have a 4870x2 now and i am wondering if i should change to 3780x2
chesterlim15 2 years ago
4870 X2 is 2 times as fast as 3870 X2 as you can see from the video.
arvutihull 2 years ago
hello wad is aa? is it anti airlisting? and wad does i do?
chesterlim15 2 years ago
It's anti-aliasing. You can learn more about it on wikipedia (just type anti-aliasing into google and it should be the first).
arvutihull 2 years ago
Okie thx for replying all 4 of my comments in other videos!^.^ LOLS and i stil put Antiairlisting... so shameful
chesterlim15 2 years ago
oic so it means dat it makes it more clearer and visible^.^
chesterlim15 2 years ago
Basically yes.
arvutihull 2 years ago
and oh ya wad is phsyx?O.o
chesterlim15 2 years ago
ok i now know wads physx but cant why do ppl wan to use another gpu rather then using the gaming GPU for physx. an example: some1 has a 3pcie x16 mobo and he is using sli for his 2 gtx280 and another gtx260 for his physx. can anyone tell me why mus we have another gpu for physx??O.O
chesterlim15 2 years ago
The spearated PhysX card will give better performance in games that support PhysX. Other card(s) would be used to run the game and the PhysX card would be used to do physX calculations.
arvutihull 2 years ago
must the seperated physx card be only one card? or can it be on sli mode? and must the seperated card be good for better physx performance? and can all 3 cards be gtx 280 and one of the is used for physx?
chesterlim15 2 years ago
Yes all 3 cards can be GTX 280's and one can be for PhysX. You can run only one card for PhysX (not SLi), even a 8600 GT is enough to run PhysX, 9600/8800/9800 GT would be a waste.
arvutihull 2 years ago
so any card can be us as physx regardless if it is a gtx 280 or 8600gt it will still have the same result?
chesterlim15 2 years ago
Basically yes. Only 8 series, 9 series, GTX series and GTS series nVidia graphics cards can be used as PhysX cards.
arvutihull 2 years ago
oic.. i am so happy and grateful for helping me out so many times. if i am not wrong last year at around nov u had helped me on the $1600 USD $2.2k SGD gaming rig but i did not choose dat as it is over my budget and i had chosen a temp com first.. but i may be changing to core i7 by this month MAYBE!. LAST of all THX for helping me out so much! =D
chesterlim15 2 years ago
No problem! :-)
arvutihull 2 years ago
lols i got lots of question ermm wad is RMA + Raffle
chesterlim15 2 years ago
Thing is RMA'ed when it's sent to warranty. Raffle is basically a lottery.
arvutihull 2 years ago