Forget jumping rope with Muslims, I lived with assigned Muslim roommates from Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, exchange students, for nearly 3 years (2007-on), and they were awesome, nice, generous people...but THEY weren't Islamic fundamentalists, they didn't care what religion I was, and they were thankful to be in the US, they loved it here. Having myself never even met someone from another country, I admit I was somewhat scared at first, but immediately realized it was unfounded. Great experience!
omfgasdfghjkl!!! There are white people that are liberals AND white people that are republican??!! AND there were some black people there TOO?? *mind. blown.* O.O
I said it before and I'll say it again. Liberals are freakin annoying. They wasted the last eight years hating George Bush so much and the rest of the country got burned for it. Even though I wasn't much of a Bush fan either. Just for those certain youtubers who need to understand.
Wow. I'll start with your point about the "democracy not auction" sign. You are right that the U.S. is a republic. But the U.S. is a special type of republic known as a representative democracy. So stop laughing stupidly to yourself like you won when their point is perfectly valid and a great one at that. This is a real problem in the US for christs sake, corporations are gaining way too much control through paying politicians and lobbyists.
You are great!! LOL LOL I am not laughing at you, but DAMN you sure know how to make it all make sense, and you do it with such taste and humor!! THANKS!
@trekfan92 So the country didn't get burned by Bush. No no, not all, it was the LIBERALS who had completely no control over anything whatsoever: they did it. Listen to yourself.
@EJ9832 Um dude in a republic it is the people who have the largest effect on the nation's stability. The government works for us. I'm not saying Bush didn't do anything wrong nor was a good president. But these people with their lousy attitudes certainly made it worse. There's no reason for that.
@EJ9832 Use a little common sense man. When a large group of people waste so much time hating on one person then obviously they're not doing anything else constructive for themselves and certainly not a the country. I don't mind a little protesting, but I don't care how bad Bush was. No reason is good enough to act like a pompous jackass. It's ok to dislike somebody, but don't be a dick while you're doing it. Just so we understand each other, I wasn't a Bush fan either.
@trekfan9 It's not true that liberals are wasting all their time hating on bush. And there is more constructive progress coming from the left. Just look at the peoples budget and how it acomplishes more while preserving ss and medicare vs the right wing plans that breaks the backs of the middle class while taking longer to address the debt problem.
I myself disagree with the tea partiers and sometimes they piss me off. But the liberals I saw there cause me to think they are the ones whos sanity needs restoring. They keep claiming the conservatives are narrow minded but if they listened to themselves they would probably realize they are just as narrow minded and in most cases just as hatefull as the conservatives. Zo I disagree with you very much but I'll atleast be open minded with what you say.
@realhxq By the means of his beliefs and rants . They are too black and white . You have to be pretty simple minded to see the world that way . There are many shades of gray to the answers of many questions . The fact that he believes in a christian god is just one of many examples .
Dude... Jon Stewart is no longer the voice of reason. They did to Jon Stewart what they did to Dave Chappelle only difference? stewart sold out. same with bill maher.
CENK UYGUR and JULIAN ASSANGE are the new leaders of truth.
I find the comment about the guy that would be "OK with separating a child from their mother's womb" to be disgusting. No one is pro-abortion. People are pro-choice, the choice to do what they want with their bodies and reproductive systems. No one enjoys getting an abortion.
I take my hat off to this guy. He found an niche. Republicans love black conservatives who hate themselves. So he filled the niche. Basically his logic goes that all democratic values are invalidated if one guy at a rally drives an SUV or one guy has an objectionable sign.
Its laughable that you think you are as smart or smarter than a scientist. Notice how every african-american treats you like shit. Its cause you are an embarrassment.
@Aegius Liberals are not racists. There is no evidence to support that claim. Republicans always say that democrats are the real racists but every election minorities vote over 80% for Democrats. If Democrats were racist they wouldn't win the minority vote. I never said Zo hates himself, I said he is willing to sell out his family for cash. I applauded him for filling the niche of the sell-out black man.
@draber12 Who are the ones who dictate to people how think on the basis of race? Lefties. Who are the ones who hurl insults on the basis of race if you differ from them b/c of your race? Lefties. "I said he is willing to sell out his family for cash. I applauded him for filling the niche of the sell-out black man. " Exactly. You are dictating to Zo and other Blacks how to think on the basis of race. You are a racist thug, just like the Left is filled w/racist thugs.
@draber12 Oh, and who are the ones who dismiss Black TEA Party leaders as tokens and in turn dismiss their merits as leaders on the basis of race? Answer: Lefties. More Left-wing racism. Who are the ones who call them sell-outs and claim that they are just doing it for money on the basis of their race? Lefties. More Left-wing racism. That's what you did, racist thug. You are a racist thug, but the Left is filled w/racist thugs. Real racism = Leftism.
@Aegius You only bring up black tea party members becuz they are black. Some one says that some of the tea party is racist and you bring up black tea party members . Well is your point they cant be racist cuz they are black? Cuz some of them are racist too. You obviously arent judging them by their character. Even though we blacks keep telling you we dont like the character or point of view of the black tea party member any more than the white tea party member.(CONT)
@rashadkijani I mention Black TP members, b/c the TP gets accused of racism. If the TP was racist, there would not be any Black TP members allowed at all. I am referring to the entire movement. Just to make this clear: I don't want a witch hunt looking for racists. "Even though we blacks keep telling you we dont like the character or point of view of the black tea party member any more than the white tea party member." So all Blacks are to think the same then? cont...
@rashadkijani "Even though we blacks keep telling you we dont like the character or point of view of the black tea party member any more than the white tea party member." "We Blacks"? So all Blacks are to think the same then? If a White does that, it is dictating to Blacks how to think on the basis of race and yes, s/he is a racist. If a Black does that, frankly he is a vicious and nasty control freak and a despicable Fascist. Apparently you're the latter. cont...
@rashadkijani See I judged you by your character via actions, not your skin color. Do I mention Black TP leaders in part due to their skin color? Yes, IN RESPONSE to the charge of racism from Lefties. If Black TP people weren't allowed, then the TP would be racist. But they are allowed & welcomed. That's the point of referring to them. Besides Lefties give no choice by fussing over racial composition. So now demonstrating that non-Whites are welcome is racist? Frankly that's nuts.
@Aegius Why do you think just cuz you allow them in the tea party that means the tea party cant be racist but then call the democrat party racist? The democrats allow blacks to be in their party too. You keep holding democrats to a different standard than you do republicans,when you judge what you call racist.
@Aegius (CONT) You seem to expect the rest of us blacks to like them just becuz they are black. Its the republican party that keeps trying appeal to us blacks by simply throwing some one else of our skin color in fromnt of our face. So its republicans who are race baiting and trying to dictate to us blacks of how to vote based on race.
@draber12 So I show proof of Lefties being racist and then automatically I stated that 100% of Lefties are racist. Sorry, didn't say that, idiot. & Yes, you are a racist thug like the Left-wing racist thugs in that video. You call Blacks who differ from you self-hating on the basis that they are Black & don't be your little thought-slaves. That makes you the real racists, racist thug.
@Aegius I'm done arguing with some hick. Yes lefties opposed civil rights. Democrats are so racist that overwhelming numbers of minorities vote for them.
The theme of this country should be Unity! We all need to check the facts. There is a such thing as cause and effect and we have experts that can predict these situations, right? We let's get a bipartisan group of people in every aspect of industry the best outcome is therefore taken. Problem solved!
@prafty And exactly which "best interest" of their own are they arguing against? Could you explain why there were black folks being PAID to picket FOX at the John Stewart Rally???
obama didn't cut shit, he extended bush's tax cuts. big difference. and the tea party aren't protesting bush's tax cuts.. they're protesting against increased government spending. Lets not forget that Obama wanted to increase taxes on small businesses.. something that would harm a lot of tea party folk.
The problem with that is, they have done about every feel good thing they could think of and they are running out of things that stimulate them. Thats why they resort to hate and deviousness.
I have been to several tea parties and I saw nothing hateful in anyway. There are simply NO words to describe these people at this event. These idiots are absolutely evil and the really bad thing is they know it. They know that they are on the wrong side of everything. They know that they are weak. They know that they live by no rules, morals or value system. They simply have lived their lives wanting to feel good.
The 2nd guy you interviewed.....I mean all he was trying to do was sell some shirts....its kinda obvious why he tried to make you stop. Kinda low man.
The People in the Tea Party are called "Tea Partyers". The Democrats are the ones who coined the term "Teabaggers". Then they claim that we didn't do our research.
What a epic fail. He tries to prove in the beginning there were no blacks there by showing a small portion of the crowd for not very long then basically conveniently show blacks and even muslims when he wants to prove another point. I guess he forgot about the first point he was trying to make. He also claimed they were working for the govenrment. Well most of the people there may have been democrats or liberals that doesnt mean they are in the government. Where was proof it was a govt event?
@rashadkijani he was saying that the % of minorities present differed little for tea party ralies, though TP rallies were acused of having racost overtones.
He then preceded to adress a comment made that the only blacks to be seen at a conservative meeting would be in the form of servers. Hence, he displayed 2 examles of blacks seeling goods, not participating in the rally with the white majority.
I really don't see what point you were making. Please follow Zo's logic. It's not hard.
@SamusVSMC You obviously didnt read what I said I never said he didnt give examples of his arguments I said he forgot his original point. And selling something and being a servant like a maid is 2 different things. That is a spin that you obviously are falling for. Black slaves were used as servants and they did not get paid for their labor. They were supposed to think serving whites was payment enough the blacks he showed were obviously getting paid for their services.
@SamusVSMC And the muslims he showed are minorities who were definitley partipating in that rally. He didnt even counter that by telling you they had muslims at the tea party rally. Maybe they did but i would figure Zo would mention that instead of bringing up the mosque zero controversy. By invoking the mosque zero issue he is obviously admitting the tea party has controversial issues with muslims while admitting that the sanity rally doesnt.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The United States of America is a democracy. There are two kinds of democracy, there is direct-democracy, where everyone who wants to vote gets to vote on every bill, majority vote wins. And there's representative-democracy (also known as a "republic"), where everyone who wants to vote gets to vote to elect representatives, these representatives then vote on bills in the senate and congress, again, majority vote wins. Democracy is simply social control by majority. Republicans are such idiots.
In a Democracy, the Majority has unlimited power over the Minority. This system of government does not provide a legal safeguard of the rights of the Individual and the Minority. It has been referred to as "Majority over Man".
@TheJakeDTH In a Republic, the Majority is Limited and constrained by a written Constitution which protects the rights of the Individual and the Minority. The purpose of a Republic form of government is to control the Majority and to protect the God-given, inalienable rights and liberty of the Individual.
The United States of America is founded as a Republic under the Constitution
"REPUBLIC! I like the sound of the word . . . it means people can live free; talk free; go or come buy or sell be drunk or sober however they choose . . . some words give ya a feeling; REPUBLIC is one of those words that makes me tight in the throat. Same tightness a man gets when his baby takes his first step, or his first baby shaves; makes his first sound like a man. Some wordscan give ya feelings that make your heart warm; REPUBLIC is one of those words"
@Darusdei It doesn't matter who gave you the rights. It only matters that the rights are protected by the government, not given to you by the government.
BTW civilization is identified by many factors, including some form of religion. By definition, you atheists are against civilization.
@Darusdei Right... and they have a much lower GDP than even China. They barely have a higher GDP than Saudi Arabia. I don't know what you call prosperity, but if it is a high change in GDP, Saudi Arabia is basically parallel. But good use of the phrase "welfare state" because it is obvious that welfare states tend to have less GDP than non-welfare states.
I got my data from Google. "Norway GDP" and click on that graph.
So tell me - how do you define "prosperity" in your case?
@Darusdei I am not an economist, but basic science tells me that the fact that the majority of a country is not religious and the fact that it has a relatively high per capita GDP may be a coincidence. There must be a million factors involved in what makes GDP per capita high or low. Therefore, I give you permission this one time to PM me a link to a study that concludes with this "atheists are more prosperous" theory.
@audioblogs12 it's not "economics" it's basic math. when you compare a country which has a 5mil population to a country that has over a billion, you have to take into account the size.
average chinese worker 7000$/year.
average swedish worker 38,031$/year
there is a correlation. same goes with education. the more educated a person is, the likelihood of atheism grows...
watch the countries in middle east or africa. ridiculously religious and it shows.
@Darusdei Exactly what religion is China? Taoism and Confucianism are NOT religions. They are philosophies because they don't teach of a God or an after life. Buddhism, in its proper form, is also a philosophy. It is only a religion if it is practice how it is portrayed in "The King and I" - and trust me, that is not always the case.
Even Einstein noted how religion and science should be balanced.
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."
@audioblogs12 where i live, religious matters are considered to be private matter and it's considered embarassing to talk about them. so i don't really have much issues with religion.
though in america i might have few chips on my shoulder :D
@Darusdei I'm glad to hear that you don't have many issues with religion, and respect that you do not want to join any religion, but why do you think religious people are stupid, or at least less educated and less prosperous than atheists?
And yes, your demonstration earlier is economy science. I have not researched these things, but how easy is it to emigrate from those Nordic countries in comparison to China? How easy is it to start a business? How high are the taxes? Those are real factors.
@Darusdei yeah, I agree. Religion is not a justification to do insane things like flying a plane into a building. I think I understand evolution, and I agree with the idea that it is a current and continuous process, but I believe that it is possible that a divine being who could create a world could change the laws of that world to fulfill a purpose - something called a "miracle", believe in them or not.
As far as abortion, I find it a moral issue - and atheists can have morals too you know.
I just started watching you and wow...gotta say i love u!!!! Lol. Keep up the good work...just wanted to say one thing though...i agree completely with climate change: it gets hot in the summer and cold in the winter :)
The already mega rich oil man, baseball team owner, millionaire had to invade Iraq, destroying his reputation, in order to....make millions of dollars he had already made at home. Or something.
Yeah I caught a glimpse of when Jon Stewart called for this "Sanity" Rally. I knew it would be the liberal-hate-protests of 2003 all over again. Where all they were there to do was hate President Bush, talk about sex/genitalia and collect welfare because they skipped out on work or refused to look for a job.
Nothing about restoring sanity? Didn't you stay until the end? What about the actual events of the rally and not the signs or the people there? Not ONE SINGLE QUOTE from Stewart or Colbert? Jeez, I guess you were pretty fair, though. You did single out a couple people from 250,000 or so. Good Job! You're building a better America!
The point of the video isn't to say everybody at the rally is immature/insensitive/etc. It is showing that there are people out in these rallies just as bad as some shown on TV from the left wing media.
No, I think in the first minute of this video he states, and I'm paraphrasing, "I didn't see much restoring sanity going on...". He clearly tried to paint everyone there with the same brush, and that's sloppy. But its expected from Neo-Con's anymore, I just wish there were some thinking conservatives left, like William F. Buckley, and not a bunch of automatons.
Around 4:10 "While they try to flex all those big worded environmental jargon, Ill just stick with what nature tells me; because despite all this global warming, it's actually been pretty cool."
Dude, you weren't listening in science in 9th grade were you?
You think it's reasonable to call a normal worship place "Islam Trophy," and say the only incentives for the scientists to do research is to look smart. If that's the result you yielded, then where did you do your research? We can just play nitpicking all day long; what's the point? And I think Stewart's intention was to tell people not to let emotions take over reasons, but unfortunately you only found the left-wing extremists out of the 215,000 everyday people to draw your conclusion.
Thanks for being our Scout at this pathetic party. Lefty's answer to Beck's rally. Incidentally, the camera loves you, Zo. You ought to have success in front and behind it. We down here in The ActivityPit hope to see you again soon on RedEye on Fox. Carry on your Great Work!
@DEMOCRATSareRACISTS Yes, Stewart used the word moderate like 20 times, but that is CODE for "kill the Republicans and Tea Party" of course. Do you people even understand how crazy you all sound?
@peoplepowered1 Regardless of this...enacting laws and taxes are nothing but negative. ALL of the "green" promotions I've seen have claimed to cut costs and save/make money over time. If this is true then businesses as well as private citizens will support it by buying it. That's how capitalism works. If there is a better service/good then people will support it by buying it. Business owners will do the same to keep costs low and profit high. Taxes only hurt the ability to support them.
@bobolob yeah, but it is still a republic more than a democracy. In fact I believe it's always been a democratic republic but please correct me if I am wrong.
@Bigginsmcgee I think what you said is correct. However, what he did in the video was discount a person for calling it a democracy when he wasn't 100% right either. Our voting system is democratic so insinuating that someone is ignorant for calling the government a democracy, which I might add the majority of Americans do whether they are Dem or Repub., is bad wordplay especially because he wasn't accurate himself.
the left will prob still claim to have more black people than 8/28. Remember all thoes black people at 8/28 cant be REAL black people. Oh well gr8 as alwayz Zo. Are you still on PJTV havent seen new for a bit ?
The greatest indication of indoctrination is SELF-CENSORSHIP.
Leftists have always been at the forefront of Self-Censorship. Political Correctness is the means to end a discussion before it starts. It allows the Academic Left to choose what topics will be discussed and how. When you leave the Leftist indoctrination camps after 12 you're wholly unable and unwilling to speak on topics outside of their proscribed frame of acceptability. More so, you're virulently antagonistic when you do.
the guy selling t shirts was like oh come on man you black too....................and the classic Liberal freak who hangs out where ever theres a Wifi signal holding the Sign with him tea bagging Dick C. OMG Classic there all a bunch of cliches saying there not cliches CLASSIC
For anyone interested, Jon Stewart's final speeech clearly said that this was NOT to make fun of ANYONE, and they also expressed messages of tolerance, for sure (Kareem Abduhl Jabbar - yes, may have spelled that wrong) was a clear message. I listened to the talking at the rally, & I listened to your video, you come off BY FAR more hateful & critical than anything that I saw that day, and I was there, too. You obviously have an agenda, talk about using a person as a pawn...
BS. The very name of the rally was offensive - as to suggest that anyone who advocates smaller government is "insane". Their was nothing their about "tolerance", and you know it. Look at the signs. Calling GOP women "sluts and whores" is tolerant? Calling people sexual slurs is tolerant? This was nothing but a bunch of angry, self deluded, young liberals who came to reassure themselves how totally smart they are and how totally stupid everyone else is. It's pathetic.
Liberals can't argue with facts, that's why they spend all of their time insulting, smearing, and intimidating descent. You are a blind fool.
Here's a little tip. If you want to save the world, try limiting the size and power of governments instead of some dorky vegan thing. You're not helping the planet by doing that, you're simply deluding yourself so you can feel better.
@Eterna1Soldier Yes, I have seen no other signs calling people names like "Nazi" or MUCH worse...right! The difference here was, these people were going for comic relief, they were NOT presenting themselves as serious. It was specifically pointed out that we should NOT make fun or ridicule people we may not fully understand. You are just obviously biased. I at least listen to all sides, & have my agreements & disagreements with BOTH sides. I don't kill anything by intention, good enough for me.
But again calling names and ridiculing comes from your side. To be expected, I guess. We say "compassion" "understanding" "sanity" "tolerance" (all those terms were said clearly at the rally), and you say "blind fool" "deluded" "dorky" and a slew of others. Hmmm. I don't need much more convincing of which side I am (mostly) on than that. I wish you the best, in spite of yourself.
One last thing - even in jest i do not agree with hate signs. i was at the rally - the majority of signs were just funny, clever, and not about a specific person or party. Yes, there were a few that were more volatile, but overall the "jump rope with a Muslim" thing was FAR more common-type of thing than any hate-speech or hate-signs. If you only watch bias sources, you only get bias info. Simple logic. "What you want to hear"
If you want to talk about incendiary comments, just look to the anti war rallies that conveniently lasted up until Obama's election. The stuff at Stewart's rally reminded me of the signs I saw at those rallies. They were very similar, albeit a little more restrained.
@realnarutoboy Again name-calling. You guys don't do much more than hate. do you? I feel bad for you. The rally had nothing to do with Obama, but your bias will make it related, of course.
Boo hoo -- I called you a name. Are you going to cry? How many tears did you shed when Bush was president and name calling was commonplace among the left?
@realnarutoboy You will destroy yourself, with your hate and fear. Do you know me? I think not. But, you have a group mentality and I think as an individual, so of course everyone not with you is against you, as you see it. Very, very sad is all. You could probably help the world if you weren't so hell-bent on hate. So sad.
You accused someone of starting a fake war. Nothing I say here today could be more hateful, incendiary, and disrespectful than that.
" [...] so long as Saddam remains in power, he threatens the well-being of his people, the peace of his region, the security of the world. The credible threat to use force, and when necessary the actual use of force, is the surest way to contain Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction program (and) curtail his aggression."
@realnarutoboy Fake is when you lie to get what you wanted in the first place. Everyone knows that Bush lied and knew there was no WMD. Period. What you think about Saddam and the rest is immaterial to why the American people were talked into supporting a war based on lies.
The quote I gave you was from Bill Clinton, you imbecile. Not me. So if Bush was lying, then so was he, so was Al Gore, so was Hillary, so was Pelosi, and so was just about every Democrat in power today.
"It is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks of biological and chemical weapons [in Iraq]."
@realnarutoboy No...really? I didn't see that (sarcasm). Anyways, the war was based on a whopper of a lie, and that is the only reason the majority of Americans supported it. They were mad they were lied to, simple as that. But, name-calling is your only defense besides endless babble that really doesn't support your point. So very sad.
Why are you calling Al Gore, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Pelosi, Sandy Berger, and Joe Biden liars?
"Remember, Peter, this is a man who has used poison gas on his own people and on his neighbors repeatedly. He’s trying to get ballistic missiles, nuclear weapons, chemical and biological weapons. He could be a mass murderer of the first order of magnitude. We are not going to allow that to happen."
@realnarutoboy Again, no matter - you are one of the very last people on Earth who don't know that Bill Clinton & Al Gore chose to NOT attack Iraq, no matter what their commentary may have been, that Bush's own people have admitted that they damn well knew there was no WMD. The weapons inspector said it (BEFORE we went), even Colin Powell said after the fact that they knew they were not being completely honest. In your bias you miss "the forest through the trees". VERY SAD for you, so hateful.
You truly are an imbecile. Bill Clinton DID attack Iraq. Under his administration, we performed air raids against Iraq. Yes, we dropped bombs on them.
I will clarify - "chose not to go to war on Iraq for WMD". I assume you are crazy - does that mean I can just come to your house and out you in jail or drive you out? 'Cause I WANT to? You just argue for the sake of arguing. Your type are pretty useless to ANY side of the issues.
@Kay7271 Didn't have time to search for your reply to my comment, but yea. You know it's bad when Bill O'Reilly says so. And just a word of advice, don't give these hateful people anymore of your time. It's just not worth the aggravation, especially when you know you are right and it doesn't matter to someone because they would disagree with you if you told them the grass was green, simply to argue with you. Just ignore their comments. You'll feel better :)
@bobolob You are a pretty funny person! The "you'll feel better" - lol! I do agree, but it was fun for a short while. There you go, spreading sanity like pixie dust...brainwasher :) my best
@Kay7271 Yea. It's fun for a while until you realize how relentless these people are to prove you wrong and make you feel bad for liking sanity. See you and I have better things to do, but it's very easy to get sidetracked into these petty arguments and we find ourselves not getting the things we need to get done because we're arguing with people who we later realize aren't worth debating with in the first place. Keyword here was "relentless". Remember sensible things confuse these people.
@bobolob Agree, totally. Tested the waters, proved that sense and rationality will just not be acceptable in here! (Oh, no she didn't...). Thanks - I always feel better knowing there are 'others' (sanity-lovers) out there...take care! :)
@Kay7271 Call a spade a spade. You don't want to debate because people disagree with you, and nobody will pretend "sanity" is a synonym for "liberalism".
That is a conceit which was thoroughly debunked by the rally itself. Enough double talk.
@mendelbot I posted plenty of 'debate', got a lot of name-calling in return. So sad for all the hate most of the people here have. So sad for you...all my best for a good and meaningful life. Bye-Bye.
@Kay7271 Pres. Bush: “If I wanted to mislead the country into war why would I pick an allegation that was certain to be disproven publicly shortly after we invaded the country?”
Seriously, your Bush Derangement Syndrome is showing and it's a little embarrassing.... for you.
You are so desperate to try and twist me to being hateful like you, but it cannot work, because I am NOT anything like you, thankfully! I am NOT biased, I listen to others, and I respect others opinions without name-calling and getting crazed. However, facts are facts.
No, you're just a brainless twit, which is worse. And if you think name-calling is something exclusive to the right, you're lying to yourself. What I'm saying to you pales in comparison to the extreme slanderous tripe that the left is known for.
Correct. Facts are facts. The problem is, you don't know what a "fact" is.
@realnarutoboy No, it is on the extremes on both sides - the crazies - the ones who will never do anything to really help anyone or anything - so - what does that say about you?
@realnarutoboy "conveniently" - lol! You people. I am doing my very best not to slander anyone, but you are really not very bright! (sorry) - MAYBE, there was a new president-elect and MAYBE people were going to give him a chance to end it on his own. MAYBE people were mad at Bush for starting a fake war...just MAYBE. Or, it was a huge conspiracy (LOL - RIIIGGGHHHTTT)
"MAYBE people were mad at Bush for starting a fake war."
You're a dumbass.
You just exposed yourself as a hypocrite, by the way. People are just as mad at Obama for what they feel he has done wrong. The difference is, their outrage is based in reality.
@realnarutoboy You assume I speak pro-Obama, and that is just how biased and hateful you are. Again, anyone not with you is against you. Must be sad to go through life that paranoid.
@realnarutoboy Who is flagging your posts? Are you doing it yourself to make it look like me? Or is there someone else in here? Why do your posts say "spam"? It isn't me, anyways, I allow for all discussion, no matter whether they act like a two year old or not.
First you accuse Zo of deleting the negative posts (something he rarely ever does -- in fact, the only time I've ever seen him delete a post was when a leftist spammed the n-word all over the place, and most of the time he won't even delete that), now you accuse me of labeling my own posts as spam. You're demented.
One more thing. You say you listened to Stewart's speech. Well how about you go and listen to Glenn Becks speech on the mall. After all, this whole comedic rally was done fo no other reason but to mock the restoring honor rally.
You know, the one that wasn't political, honored our military, brought Jews, Christians, and Muslims together in prayer, prayed for our president, congress, and country, and donated 5 million dollars to the wounded warriors fund.
In fact, what exactly do you think you accomplished when you went there? Seriously, what did you guys do to "promote tolerance"? You guys just held up a bunch of offensive signs insulting other people you disagree with and their faith. You guys listened to music. You guys did "the wave" with Adam Savage for no reason at all.
Glenn's rally actually stood for something - true tolerance, faith in God and each other, and restoring honor. This mock rally was just that, blatant mockery.
@Eterna1Soldier You are bias. I have seen Glen Beck's speech. I have watched Glen Beck say very smart things, and then I have also watched him directly contradict himself on the same day from morning to night. They are all crazed, and you are just not a very nice person, period. I am sooo glad I went to that rally...there are some really n
Comment removed
EHeroAndrew 1 month ago
stretch prius!!!!!!!!!!!
nosredna1624 1 month ago
Forget jumping rope with Muslims, I lived with assigned Muslim roommates from Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, exchange students, for nearly 3 years (2007-on), and they were awesome, nice, generous people...but THEY weren't Islamic fundamentalists, they didn't care what religion I was, and they were thankful to be in the US, they loved it here. Having myself never even met someone from another country, I admit I was somewhat scared at first, but immediately realized it was unfounded. Great experience!
ramv36 2 months ago 2
omfgasdfghjkl!!! There are white people that are liberals AND white people that are republican??!! AND there were some black people there TOO?? *mind. blown.* O.O
iFlute4life 2 months ago
oh man i was laughing through 50% of this video. let the wise guys be seen for what they are lol
7kyro 2 months ago
Good one Zoe.
tstatech 6 months ago
I said it before and I'll say it again. Liberals are freakin annoying. They wasted the last eight years hating George Bush so much and the rest of the country got burned for it. Even though I wasn't much of a Bush fan either. Just for those certain youtubers who need to understand.
trekfan92 7 months ago
I don't know whether or not to take this guy seriously. Is he being a fake republican pndit like stephen colbert or is he ACTUALLY serious?
YJPY 7 months ago
@YJPY he's lighthearted but he means it.
Ravengaurd6 2 months ago
Wow. I'll start with your point about the "democracy not auction" sign. You are right that the U.S. is a republic. But the U.S. is a special type of republic known as a representative democracy. So stop laughing stupidly to yourself like you won when their point is perfectly valid and a great one at that. This is a real problem in the US for christs sake, corporations are gaining way too much control through paying politicians and lobbyists.
EJ9832 7 months ago
Jump rope with a Muslim?
Sign me up!
CarlChub 8 months ago
Best video in a long time
98Mpower 9 months ago
You are great!! LOL LOL I am not laughing at you, but DAMN you sure know how to make it all make sense, and you do it with such taste and humor!! THANKS!
mommy5bears 9 months ago
Liberals are freakin annoying. They wasted eight years hating George Bush so much and the rest of the country got burned for it.
trekfan92 10 months ago
@trekfan92 So the country didn't get burned by Bush. No no, not all, it was the LIBERALS who had completely no control over anything whatsoever: they did it. Listen to yourself.
EJ9832 7 months ago
@EJ9832 Um dude in a republic it is the people who have the largest effect on the nation's stability. The government works for us. I'm not saying Bush didn't do anything wrong nor was a good president. But these people with their lousy attitudes certainly made it worse. There's no reason for that.
trekfan92 7 months ago
@trekfan92 Certainly you say? Please, demonstrate a single way in which that is true.
EJ9832 7 months ago
@EJ9832 Use a little common sense man. When a large group of people waste so much time hating on one person then obviously they're not doing anything else constructive for themselves and certainly not a the country. I don't mind a little protesting, but I don't care how bad Bush was. No reason is good enough to act like a pompous jackass. It's ok to dislike somebody, but don't be a dick while you're doing it. Just so we understand each other, I wasn't a Bush fan either.
trekfan92 7 months ago
@trekfan9 It's not true that liberals are wasting all their time hating on bush. And there is more constructive progress coming from the left. Just look at the peoples budget and how it acomplishes more while preserving ss and medicare vs the right wing plans that breaks the backs of the middle class while taking longer to address the debt problem.
EJ9832 7 months ago
@EJ9832 That is completely a one sided biased and exaggerated argument and not even worth responding to.
trekfan92 7 months ago
@trekfan92 OK, keep pretending those descriptions don't apply to your own argument.
EJ9832 7 months ago
I myself disagree with the tea partiers and sometimes they piss me off. But the liberals I saw there cause me to think they are the ones whos sanity needs restoring. They keep claiming the conservatives are narrow minded but if they listened to themselves they would probably realize they are just as narrow minded and in most cases just as hatefull as the conservatives. Zo I disagree with you very much but I'll atleast be open minded with what you say.
maddog2283 10 months ago
This guys is stupid and ignorant .
bonnevie9 10 months ago
@bonnevie9 by what means ?
realhxq 10 months ago
@realhxq By the means of his beliefs and rants . They are too black and white . You have to be pretty simple minded to see the world that way . There are many shades of gray to the answers of many questions . The fact that he believes in a christian god is just one of many examples .
bonnevie9 10 months ago
LMAO Streth prius.....
Heatcho 11 months ago
Dude... Jon Stewart is no longer the voice of reason. They did to Jon Stewart what they did to Dave Chappelle only difference? stewart sold out. same with bill maher.
CENK UYGUR and JULIAN ASSANGE are the new leaders of truth.
Maziyar 11 months ago
I find the comment about the guy that would be "OK with separating a child from their mother's womb" to be disgusting. No one is pro-abortion. People are pro-choice, the choice to do what they want with their bodies and reproductive systems. No one enjoys getting an abortion.
MinGophers 1 year ago
A bunch of white rich communists.
agrincourt 1 year ago
I take my hat off to this guy. He found an niche. Republicans love black conservatives who hate themselves. So he filled the niche. Basically his logic goes that all democratic values are invalidated if one guy at a rally drives an SUV or one guy has an objectionable sign.
Its laughable that you think you are as smart or smarter than a scientist. Notice how every african-american treats you like shit. Its cause you are an embarrassment.
draber12 1 year ago
@draber12 Zo doesn't hate himself at all. YOu are a racist for stating as such. But then again the real racists are Lefties like you, racist thug.
Aegius 1 year ago
@Aegius Liberals are not racists. There is no evidence to support that claim. Republicans always say that democrats are the real racists but every election minorities vote over 80% for Democrats. If Democrats were racist they wouldn't win the minority vote. I never said Zo hates himself, I said he is willing to sell out his family for cash. I applauded him for filling the niche of the sell-out black man.
draber12 1 year ago
@draber12 Who are the ones who dictate to people how think on the basis of race? Lefties. Who are the ones who hurl insults on the basis of race if you differ from them b/c of your race? Lefties. "I said he is willing to sell out his family for cash. I applauded him for filling the niche of the sell-out black man. " Exactly. You are dictating to Zo and other Blacks how to think on the basis of race. You are a racist thug, just like the Left is filled w/racist thugs.
Aegius 1 year ago
@draber12 Oh, and who are the ones who dismiss Black TEA Party leaders as tokens and in turn dismiss their merits as leaders on the basis of race? Answer: Lefties. More Left-wing racism. Who are the ones who call them sell-outs and claim that they are just doing it for money on the basis of their race? Lefties. More Left-wing racism. That's what you did, racist thug. You are a racist thug, but the Left is filled w/racist thugs. Real racism = Leftism.
Aegius 1 year ago
@Aegius You only bring up black tea party members becuz they are black. Some one says that some of the tea party is racist and you bring up black tea party members . Well is your point they cant be racist cuz they are black? Cuz some of them are racist too. You obviously arent judging them by their character. Even though we blacks keep telling you we dont like the character or point of view of the black tea party member any more than the white tea party member.(CONT)
rashadkijani 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@rashadkijani I mention Black TP members, b/c the TP gets accused of racism. If the TP was racist, there would not be any Black TP members allowed at all. I am referring to the entire movement. Just to make this clear: I don't want a witch hunt looking for racists. "Even though we blacks keep telling you we dont like the character or point of view of the black tea party member any more than the white tea party member." So all Blacks are to think the same then? cont...
Aegius 11 months ago
@rashadkijani "Even though we blacks keep telling you we dont like the character or point of view of the black tea party member any more than the white tea party member." "We Blacks"? So all Blacks are to think the same then? If a White does that, it is dictating to Blacks how to think on the basis of race and yes, s/he is a racist. If a Black does that, frankly he is a vicious and nasty control freak and a despicable Fascist. Apparently you're the latter. cont...
Aegius 11 months ago
@rashadkijani See I judged you by your character via actions, not your skin color. Do I mention Black TP leaders in part due to their skin color? Yes, IN RESPONSE to the charge of racism from Lefties. If Black TP people weren't allowed, then the TP would be racist. But they are allowed & welcomed. That's the point of referring to them. Besides Lefties give no choice by fussing over racial composition. So now demonstrating that non-Whites are welcome is racist? Frankly that's nuts.
Aegius 11 months ago
@Aegius Why do you think just cuz you allow them in the tea party that means the tea party cant be racist but then call the democrat party racist? The democrats allow blacks to be in their party too. You keep holding democrats to a different standard than you do republicans,when you judge what you call racist.
rashadkijani 11 months ago
@Aegius (CONT) You seem to expect the rest of us blacks to like them just becuz they are black. Its the republican party that keeps trying appeal to us blacks by simply throwing some one else of our skin color in fromnt of our face. So its republicans who are race baiting and trying to dictate to us blacks of how to vote based on race.
rashadkijani 11 months ago
@draber12 Proof of Lefties being the real racists, just like you are, racist thug: watch?v=E3ctO7fdrcc
Aegius 11 months ago
@Aegius You convinced me. One liberal being semi-racist = all liberals racist. Dumb ass
draber12 11 months ago
@draber12 So I show proof of Lefties being racist and then automatically I stated that 100% of Lefties are racist. Sorry, didn't say that, idiot. & Yes, you are a racist thug like the Left-wing racist thugs in that video. You call Blacks who differ from you self-hating on the basis that they are Black & don't be your little thought-slaves. That makes you the real racists, racist thug.
Aegius 11 months ago
@Aegius I'm done arguing with some hick. Yes lefties opposed civil rights. Democrats are so racist that overwhelming numbers of minorities vote for them.
draber12 11 months ago
Excellent! :) Great Job on clarity!
charliechatbox 1 year ago
The theme of this country should be Unity! We all need to check the facts. There is a such thing as cause and effect and we have experts that can predict these situations, right? We let's get a bipartisan group of people in every aspect of industry the best outcome is therefore taken. Problem solved!
jaw0rsk1 1 year ago
wtf @ 05:55. what is it trying to say
TheVaccine100 1 year ago
@6:00, the guy's from Mass and doesn't understand the connection with the Tea Partiers and the Boston Tea Party. I love stupidity.
antipryzm 1 year ago
Zo is the freakin' man. Keep fighting the good fight dude, this stuff is priceless.
tfs94gt 1 year ago
YOURE AN ASSHOLE ZO
tomas6262 1 year ago
no-one thinks that tea party rallys are rich white people, they're poor white people arguing against their best interests. it's sad.
prafty 1 year ago
@prafty And exactly which "best interest" of their own are they arguing against? Could you explain why there were black folks being PAID to picket FOX at the John Stewart Rally???
tfs94gt 1 year ago
@prafty
more/higher taxes is against their best interest?
great thinking.
antipryzm 1 year ago
@antipryzm
wake up, obama cut taxes for 98% of the population. if the tea party folk aren't all rich then they're protesting their tax cuts.
prafty 1 year ago
@prafty
obama didn't cut shit, he extended bush's tax cuts. big difference. and the tea party aren't protesting bush's tax cuts.. they're protesting against increased government spending. Lets not forget that Obama wanted to increase taxes on small businesses.. something that would harm a lot of tea party folk.
antipryzm 1 year ago
The problem with that is, they have done about every feel good thing they could think of and they are running out of things that stimulate them. Thats why they resort to hate and deviousness.
GeorgeBonez 1 year ago
I have been to several tea parties and I saw nothing hateful in anyway. There are simply NO words to describe these people at this event. These idiots are absolutely evil and the really bad thing is they know it. They know that they are on the wrong side of everything. They know that they are weak. They know that they live by no rules, morals or value system. They simply have lived their lives wanting to feel good.
GeorgeBonez 1 year ago
I found the "Grip on sanity" joke at the end hilarious.
thestevester94 1 year ago
Laaaaaame!
Oh no! The Federal Government getting involved? How awful! That's why TEA Boy Joe Miller is seeking a Fed injunction in a state-controlled election.
Wow, you GOP dumbshits are an exercise in hypocrisy.
spamvigilante 1 year ago
The 2nd guy you interviewed.....I mean all he was trying to do was sell some shirts....its kinda obvious why he tried to make you stop. Kinda low man.
But I still love ya
superlucci 1 year ago
The rally for stop complaining when government fucks you over and vote for Obama the corporate puppet again.
james9689 1 year ago 2
The People in the Tea Party are called "Tea Partyers". The Democrats are the ones who coined the term "Teabaggers". Then they claim that we didn't do our research.
user12348071 1 year ago
Great job dude!! You are my brother!
iammoonami 1 year ago
I love it when people just show up with signs and have no real agenda or even know what they are talking about.
scarecrow6524 1 year ago
What a epic fail. He tries to prove in the beginning there were no blacks there by showing a small portion of the crowd for not very long then basically conveniently show blacks and even muslims when he wants to prove another point. I guess he forgot about the first point he was trying to make. He also claimed they were working for the govenrment. Well most of the people there may have been democrats or liberals that doesnt mean they are in the government. Where was proof it was a govt event?
rashadkijani 1 year ago
@rashadkijani he was saying that the % of minorities present differed little for tea party ralies, though TP rallies were acused of having racost overtones.
He then preceded to adress a comment made that the only blacks to be seen at a conservative meeting would be in the form of servers. Hence, he displayed 2 examles of blacks seeling goods, not participating in the rally with the white majority.
I really don't see what point you were making. Please follow Zo's logic. It's not hard.
SamusVSMC 1 year ago
@SamusVSMC You obviously didnt read what I said I never said he didnt give examples of his arguments I said he forgot his original point. And selling something and being a servant like a maid is 2 different things. That is a spin that you obviously are falling for. Black slaves were used as servants and they did not get paid for their labor. They were supposed to think serving whites was payment enough the blacks he showed were obviously getting paid for their services.
rashadkijani 1 year ago
@SamusVSMC And the muslims he showed are minorities who were definitley partipating in that rally. He didnt even counter that by telling you they had muslims at the tea party rally. Maybe they did but i would figure Zo would mention that instead of bringing up the mosque zero controversy. By invoking the mosque zero issue he is obviously admitting the tea party has controversial issues with muslims while admitting that the sanity rally doesnt.
rashadkijani 1 year ago
@SamusVSMC So that is implying that the sanity rally is more accepting, tolerant, or whatever word you want to use of muslims than the tea party is.
rashadkijani 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The United States of America is a democracy. There are two kinds of democracy, there is direct-democracy, where everyone who wants to vote gets to vote on every bill, majority vote wins. And there's representative-democracy (also known as a "republic"), where everyone who wants to vote gets to vote to elect representatives, these representatives then vote on bills in the senate and congress, again, majority vote wins. Democracy is simply social control by majority. Republicans are such idiots.
TheJakeDTH 1 year ago
@TheJakeDTH
In a Democracy, the Majority has unlimited power over the Minority. This system of government does not provide a legal safeguard of the rights of the Individual and the Minority. It has been referred to as "Majority over Man".
.
Cleverockz 1 year ago
@TheJakeDTH In a Republic, the Majority is Limited and constrained by a written Constitution which protects the rights of the Individual and the Minority. The purpose of a Republic form of government is to control the Majority and to protect the God-given, inalienable rights and liberty of the Individual.
The United States of America is founded as a Republic under the Constitution
Cleverockz 1 year ago 20
This has been flagged as spam show
@Cleverockz
"REPUBLIC! I like the sound of the word . . . it means people can live free; talk free; go or come buy or sell be drunk or sober however they choose . . . some words give ya a feeling; REPUBLIC is one of those words that makes me tight in the throat. Same tightness a man gets when his baby takes his first step, or his first baby shaves; makes his first sound like a man. Some wordscan give ya feelings that make your heart warm; REPUBLIC is one of those words"
John Wayne: The Alamo
EchoMike03 1 year ago
@Cleverockz god given rights? lol, logic fail...
Darusdei 7 months ago
@Darusdei Sad you can't comprehend.....talk about fail!
Cleverockz 7 months ago
@Cleverockz Well let's just say people won't take you seriously when you make claims that your imaginary friend gave you rights
Darusdei 7 months ago
@Darusdei It doesn't matter who gave you the rights. It only matters that the rights are protected by the government, not given to you by the government.
BTW civilization is identified by many factors, including some form of religion. By definition, you atheists are against civilization.
audioblogs12 5 months ago
@audioblogs12 ofcourse and that's propably why the most atheistic parts of the world are now the most prosperous wellfare states on the planet...
Darusdei 5 months ago
@Darusdei Go ahead, give me an example.
audioblogs12 5 months ago
@audioblogs12 nordic countries.
sweden, norway etc etc etc...
Darusdei 5 months ago
@Darusdei Right... and they have a much lower GDP than even China. They barely have a higher GDP than Saudi Arabia. I don't know what you call prosperity, but if it is a high change in GDP, Saudi Arabia is basically parallel. But good use of the phrase "welfare state" because it is obvious that welfare states tend to have less GDP than non-welfare states.
I got my data from Google. "Norway GDP" and click on that graph.
So tell me - how do you define "prosperity" in your case?
audioblogs12 5 months ago
@audioblogs12 GDP (PPP) per capita. you fucking idiot...
do you know even how to compare these numbers? :DD
you should definitely go back to basic math and figure this one out... or are you the example of the oh so great american education :DDD
Darusdei 5 months ago
@Darusdei I am not an economist, but basic science tells me that the fact that the majority of a country is not religious and the fact that it has a relatively high per capita GDP may be a coincidence. There must be a million factors involved in what makes GDP per capita high or low. Therefore, I give you permission this one time to PM me a link to a study that concludes with this "atheists are more prosperous" theory.
audioblogs12 5 months ago
@audioblogs12 it's not "economics" it's basic math. when you compare a country which has a 5mil population to a country that has over a billion, you have to take into account the size.
average chinese worker 7000$/year.
average swedish worker 38,031$/year
there is a correlation. same goes with education. the more educated a person is, the likelihood of atheism grows...
watch the countries in middle east or africa. ridiculously religious and it shows.
Darusdei 5 months ago
@Darusdei Exactly what religion is China? Taoism and Confucianism are NOT religions. They are philosophies because they don't teach of a God or an after life. Buddhism, in its proper form, is also a philosophy. It is only a religion if it is practice how it is portrayed in "The King and I" - and trust me, that is not always the case.
Even Einstein noted how religion and science should be balanced.
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."
audioblogs12 5 months ago
@audioblogs12 where i live, religious matters are considered to be private matter and it's considered embarassing to talk about them. so i don't really have much issues with religion.
though in america i might have few chips on my shoulder :D
Darusdei 5 months ago
@Darusdei I'm glad to hear that you don't have many issues with religion, and respect that you do not want to join any religion, but why do you think religious people are stupid, or at least less educated and less prosperous than atheists?
And yes, your demonstration earlier is economy science. I have not researched these things, but how easy is it to emigrate from those Nordic countries in comparison to China? How easy is it to start a business? How high are the taxes? Those are real factors.
audioblogs12 5 months ago
@audioblogs12 ofcourse there are multiple factors to pretty much everything.
but when you start to justify your actions through religion, problems arise.
for example in texas that dentist who leads the board of education, who tries to debunk evolution.
when we have people who deny reality because of their holy books, we have a problem.
or when you debate abortion on the grounds of religion is just insane.
Darusdei 5 months ago
@Darusdei yeah, I agree. Religion is not a justification to do insane things like flying a plane into a building. I think I understand evolution, and I agree with the idea that it is a current and continuous process, but I believe that it is possible that a divine being who could create a world could change the laws of that world to fulfill a purpose - something called a "miracle", believe in them or not.
As far as abortion, I find it a moral issue - and atheists can have morals too you know.
audioblogs12 5 months ago
I just started watching you and wow...gotta say i love u!!!! Lol. Keep up the good work...just wanted to say one thing though...i agree completely with climate change: it gets hot in the summer and cold in the winter :)
808k1k2k3k4k5 1 year ago
i'm a frig-in american too. thanks for affirming us both.
MrToastedtoad 1 year ago
@jplaughalot
Perfectly logical.
The already mega rich oil man, baseball team owner, millionaire had to invade Iraq, destroying his reputation, in order to....make millions of dollars he had already made at home. Or something.
realnarutoboy 1 year ago
Yeah I caught a glimpse of when Jon Stewart called for this "Sanity" Rally. I knew it would be the liberal-hate-protests of 2003 all over again. Where all they were there to do was hate President Bush, talk about sex/genitalia and collect welfare because they skipped out on work or refused to look for a job.
Pathetic!
jrc99us 1 year ago
Nothing about restoring sanity? Didn't you stay until the end? What about the actual events of the rally and not the signs or the people there? Not ONE SINGLE QUOTE from Stewart or Colbert? Jeez, I guess you were pretty fair, though. You did single out a couple people from 250,000 or so. Good Job! You're building a better America!
ebaykid1978 1 year ago
@ebaykid1978
Because liberals don't do the same exact thing when they go to Tea Parties, right?
junkiemonkey121 1 year ago
@junkiemonkey121
Its junky journalism, if you can even call it that, and if some liberals are as careless and biased as this asshole, then they're sloppy, too.
ebaykid1978 1 year ago
@ebaykid1978
The point of the video isn't to say everybody at the rally is immature/insensitive/etc. It is showing that there are people out in these rallies just as bad as some shown on TV from the left wing media.
junkiemonkey121 1 year ago
@junkiemonkey121
No, I think in the first minute of this video he states, and I'm paraphrasing, "I didn't see much restoring sanity going on...". He clearly tried to paint everyone there with the same brush, and that's sloppy. But its expected from Neo-Con's anymore, I just wish there were some thinking conservatives left, like William F. Buckley, and not a bunch of automatons.
ebaykid1978 1 year ago
Around 4:10 "While they try to flex all those big worded environmental jargon, Ill just stick with what nature tells me; because despite all this global warming, it's actually been pretty cool."
Dude, you weren't listening in science in 9th grade were you?
letsgetsnacks 1 year ago
OMG these people that were interviewed are complete MORONS! Very enjoyable to watch. Keep up the good work!
JennBoop 1 year ago 19
@JennBoop I loved it too ;)
smoochX3 1 year ago
You think it's reasonable to call a normal worship place "Islam Trophy," and say the only incentives for the scientists to do research is to look smart. If that's the result you yielded, then where did you do your research? We can just play nitpicking all day long; what's the point? And I think Stewart's intention was to tell people not to let emotions take over reasons, but unfortunately you only found the left-wing extremists out of the 215,000 everyday people to draw your conclusion.
videofn 1 year ago
@DEMOCRATSareRACISTS lol! Such evil, hate seething from every cell of your body. Soooo sad for you.
Kay7271 1 year ago
Brave and Bold, with a important story to be told.
9jmorrison 1 year ago
Thanks for being our Scout at this pathetic party. Lefty's answer to Beck's rally. Incidentally, the camera loves you, Zo. You ought to have success in front and behind it. We down here in The ActivityPit hope to see you again soon on RedEye on Fox. Carry on your Great Work!
MissJewels77 1 year ago
It's a Washington, D.C. phone number, but I don't know what organization.
MooseOfReason 1 year ago
Thank you Zo. I really enjoy your posts. God Bless You.
GruntTGH 1 year ago
@DEMOCRATSareRACISTS Yes, Stewart used the word moderate like 20 times, but that is CODE for "kill the Republicans and Tea Party" of course. Do you people even understand how crazy you all sound?
Kay7271 1 year ago
Stewarts rally looked like fun.
Beckie's? Not so much...
WoodyLittle 1 year ago
@WoodyLittle It was AWESOME fun, and it was in the spirit of being good to others...no matter what these people try to make it.
Kay7271 1 year ago
The clock is ticking...
Where are the free guns and cessation of tax?
WoodyLittle 1 year ago
Possibly the best one yet Zoe, and that's says a lot.
RavenRP 1 year ago
O, ZO! I LOVE YOU SO!!!! :)
krazykim84 1 year ago
@peoplepowered1 Regardless of this...enacting laws and taxes are nothing but negative. ALL of the "green" promotions I've seen have claimed to cut costs and save/make money over time. If this is true then businesses as well as private citizens will support it by buying it. That's how capitalism works. If there is a better service/good then people will support it by buying it. Business owners will do the same to keep costs low and profit high. Taxes only hurt the ability to support them.
Bigginsmcgee 1 year ago
@bobolob yeah, but it is still a republic more than a democracy. In fact I believe it's always been a democratic republic but please correct me if I am wrong.
Bigginsmcgee 1 year ago
@Bigginsmcgee I think what you said is correct. However, what he did in the video was discount a person for calling it a democracy when he wasn't 100% right either. Our voting system is democratic so insinuating that someone is ignorant for calling the government a democracy, which I might add the majority of Americans do whether they are Dem or Repub., is bad wordplay especially because he wasn't accurate himself.
bobolob 1 year ago
There is a real stretch Prius...
Tylerxy 1 year ago
the left will prob still claim to have more black people than 8/28. Remember all thoes black people at 8/28 cant be REAL black people. Oh well gr8 as alwayz Zo. Are you still on PJTV havent seen new for a bit ?
JASONZx6R 1 year ago
The greatest indication of indoctrination is SELF-CENSORSHIP.
Leftists have always been at the forefront of Self-Censorship. Political Correctness is the means to end a discussion before it starts. It allows the Academic Left to choose what topics will be discussed and how. When you leave the Leftist indoctrination camps after 12 you're wholly unable and unwilling to speak on topics outside of their proscribed frame of acceptability. More so, you're virulently antagonistic when you do.
thomaserossi 1 year ago
LOL straight up "Just curious who's paying you guys" LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
FiloJuan 1 year ago
the guy selling t shirts was like oh come on man you black too....................and the classic Liberal freak who hangs out where ever theres a Wifi signal holding the Sign with him tea bagging Dick C. OMG Classic there all a bunch of cliches saying there not cliches CLASSIC
XanderRcage 1 year ago
LOL that old man thinks the Tea Party and the right doesn't research
Wheeljack35 1 year ago
Good work as always Zo
EXEGUNSO 1 year ago
For anyone interested, Jon Stewart's final speeech clearly said that this was NOT to make fun of ANYONE, and they also expressed messages of tolerance, for sure (Kareem Abduhl Jabbar - yes, may have spelled that wrong) was a clear message. I listened to the talking at the rally, & I listened to your video, you come off BY FAR more hateful & critical than anything that I saw that day, and I was there, too. You obviously have an agenda, talk about using a person as a pawn...
Kay7271 1 year ago
@Kay7271
BS. The very name of the rally was offensive - as to suggest that anyone who advocates smaller government is "insane". Their was nothing their about "tolerance", and you know it. Look at the signs. Calling GOP women "sluts and whores" is tolerant? Calling people sexual slurs is tolerant? This was nothing but a bunch of angry, self deluded, young liberals who came to reassure themselves how totally smart they are and how totally stupid everyone else is. It's pathetic.
Eterna1Soldier 1 year ago 2
@Kay7271
Liberals can't argue with facts, that's why they spend all of their time insulting, smearing, and intimidating descent. You are a blind fool.
Here's a little tip. If you want to save the world, try limiting the size and power of governments instead of some dorky vegan thing. You're not helping the planet by doing that, you're simply deluding yourself so you can feel better.
Eterna1Soldier 1 year ago 9
@Eterna1Soldier Yes, I have seen no other signs calling people names like "Nazi" or MUCH worse...right! The difference here was, these people were going for comic relief, they were NOT presenting themselves as serious. It was specifically pointed out that we should NOT make fun or ridicule people we may not fully understand. You are just obviously biased. I at least listen to all sides, & have my agreements & disagreements with BOTH sides. I don't kill anything by intention, good enough for me.
Kay7271 1 year ago
But again calling names and ridiculing comes from your side. To be expected, I guess. We say "compassion" "understanding" "sanity" "tolerance" (all those terms were said clearly at the rally), and you say "blind fool" "deluded" "dorky" and a slew of others. Hmmm. I don't need much more convincing of which side I am (mostly) on than that. I wish you the best, in spite of yourself.
Kay7271 1 year ago
One last thing - even in jest i do not agree with hate signs. i was at the rally - the majority of signs were just funny, clever, and not about a specific person or party. Yes, there were a few that were more volatile, but overall the "jump rope with a Muslim" thing was FAR more common-type of thing than any hate-speech or hate-signs. If you only watch bias sources, you only get bias info. Simple logic. "What you want to hear"
Kay7271 1 year ago
@Kay7271
You have a lot of nerve there, moron.
If you want to talk about incendiary comments, just look to the anti war rallies that conveniently lasted up until Obama's election. The stuff at Stewart's rally reminded me of the signs I saw at those rallies. They were very similar, albeit a little more restrained.
realnarutoboy 1 year ago
@realnarutoboy Again name-calling. You guys don't do much more than hate. do you? I feel bad for you. The rally had nothing to do with Obama, but your bias will make it related, of course.
Kay7271 1 year ago
@Kay7271
Boo hoo -- I called you a name. Are you going to cry? How many tears did you shed when Bush was president and name calling was commonplace among the left?
realnarutoboy 1 year ago
@realnarutoboy You will destroy yourself, with your hate and fear. Do you know me? I think not. But, you have a group mentality and I think as an individual, so of course everyone not with you is against you, as you see it. Very, very sad is all. You could probably help the world if you weren't so hell-bent on hate. So sad.
Kay7271 1 year ago
@Kay7271
You accused someone of starting a fake war. Nothing I say here today could be more hateful, incendiary, and disrespectful than that.
" [...] so long as Saddam remains in power, he threatens the well-being of his people, the peace of his region, the security of the world. The credible threat to use force, and when necessary the actual use of force, is the surest way to contain Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction program (and) curtail his aggression."
- Bill Clinton , 1998.
Fake!1
realnarutoboy 1 year ago
@realnarutoboy Fake is when you lie to get what you wanted in the first place. Everyone knows that Bush lied and knew there was no WMD. Period. What you think about Saddam and the rest is immaterial to why the American people were talked into supporting a war based on lies.
Kay7271 1 year ago
@Kay7271
The quote I gave you was from Bill Clinton, you imbecile. Not me. So if Bush was lying, then so was he, so was Al Gore, so was Hillary, so was Pelosi, and so was just about every Democrat in power today.
"It is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks of biological and chemical weapons [in Iraq]."
- Bill Clinton
realnarutoboy 1 year ago
@realnarutoboy No...really? I didn't see that (sarcasm). Anyways, the war was based on a whopper of a lie, and that is the only reason the majority of Americans supported it. They were mad they were lied to, simple as that. But, name-calling is your only defense besides endless babble that really doesn't support your point. So very sad.
Kay7271 1 year ago
@Kay7271
Why are you calling Al Gore, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Pelosi, Sandy Berger, and Joe Biden liars?
"Remember, Peter, this is a man who has used poison gas on his own people and on his neighbors repeatedly. He’s trying to get ballistic missiles, nuclear weapons, chemical and biological weapons. He could be a mass murderer of the first order of magnitude. We are not going to allow that to happen."
- Al Gore
realnarutoboy 1 year ago
@realnarutoboy Again, no matter - you are one of the very last people on Earth who don't know that Bill Clinton & Al Gore chose to NOT attack Iraq, no matter what their commentary may have been, that Bush's own people have admitted that they damn well knew there was no WMD. The weapons inspector said it (BEFORE we went), even Colin Powell said after the fact that they knew they were not being completely honest. In your bias you miss "the forest through the trees". VERY SAD for you, so hateful.
Kay7271 1 year ago
@Kay7271
You truly are an imbecile. Bill Clinton DID attack Iraq. Under his administration, we performed air raids against Iraq. Yes, we dropped bombs on them.
realnarutoboy 1 year ago
@Kay7271
"December 1998 bombing of Iraq" Research that and learn something.
Do you need me to tell you when Bill Clinton was president, too?
"On October 31, 1998 US President Bill Clinton had signed into law H.R. 4655, the Iraq Liberation Act."
realnarutoboy 1 year ago
I will clarify - "chose not to go to war on Iraq for WMD". I assume you are crazy - does that mean I can just come to your house and out you in jail or drive you out? 'Cause I WANT to? You just argue for the sake of arguing. Your type are pretty useless to ANY side of the issues.
Kay7271 1 year ago
@Kay7271 Didn't have time to search for your reply to my comment, but yea. You know it's bad when Bill O'Reilly says so. And just a word of advice, don't give these hateful people anymore of your time. It's just not worth the aggravation, especially when you know you are right and it doesn't matter to someone because they would disagree with you if you told them the grass was green, simply to argue with you. Just ignore their comments. You'll feel better :)
bobolob 1 year ago
@bobolob You are a pretty funny person! The "you'll feel better" - lol! I do agree, but it was fun for a short while. There you go, spreading sanity like pixie dust...brainwasher :) my best
Kay7271 1 year ago
@Kay7271 Yea. It's fun for a while until you realize how relentless these people are to prove you wrong and make you feel bad for liking sanity. See you and I have better things to do, but it's very easy to get sidetracked into these petty arguments and we find ourselves not getting the things we need to get done because we're arguing with people who we later realize aren't worth debating with in the first place. Keyword here was "relentless". Remember sensible things confuse these people.
bobolob 1 year ago
@bobolob Agree, totally. Tested the waters, proved that sense and rationality will just not be acceptable in here! (Oh, no she didn't...). Thanks - I always feel better knowing there are 'others' (sanity-lovers) out there...take care! :)
Kay7271 1 year ago
@Kay7271 Call a spade a spade. You don't want to debate because people disagree with you, and nobody will pretend "sanity" is a synonym for "liberalism".
That is a conceit which was thoroughly debunked by the rally itself. Enough double talk.
mendelbot 1 year ago
@mendelbot I posted plenty of 'debate', got a lot of name-calling in return. So sad for all the hate most of the people here have. So sad for you...all my best for a good and meaningful life. Bye-Bye.
Kay7271 1 year ago
@Kay7271 Well good luck in your search for starting rational debates with insulting presuppositions. Just kidding, all the best. Seriously. :-)
mendelbot 1 year ago
@mendelbot lol...that was funny! My best to you as well. :)
Kay7271 1 year ago
(Or to attack Iraq based on a total and obvious lie)
Kay7271 1 year ago
@Kay7271 Pres. Bush: “If I wanted to mislead the country into war why would I pick an allegation that was certain to be disproven publicly shortly after we invaded the country?”
Seriously, your Bush Derangement Syndrome is showing and it's a little embarrassing.... for you.
Yakko77 1 year ago
You are so desperate to try and twist me to being hateful like you, but it cannot work, because I am NOT anything like you, thankfully! I am NOT biased, I listen to others, and I respect others opinions without name-calling and getting crazed. However, facts are facts.
Kay7271 1 year ago
@Kay7271
No, you're just a brainless twit, which is worse. And if you think name-calling is something exclusive to the right, you're lying to yourself. What I'm saying to you pales in comparison to the extreme slanderous tripe that the left is known for.
Correct. Facts are facts. The problem is, you don't know what a "fact" is.
realnarutoboy 1 year ago
@realnarutoboy No, it is on the extremes on both sides - the crazies - the ones who will never do anything to really help anyone or anything - so - what does that say about you?
Kay7271 1 year ago
@Kay7271
If there truly is a subset of sane/rational leftists, then they seriously need to do something about you impersonating them.
realnarutoboy 1 year ago
@realnarutoboy "conveniently" - lol! You people. I am doing my very best not to slander anyone, but you are really not very bright! (sorry) - MAYBE, there was a new president-elect and MAYBE people were going to give him a chance to end it on his own. MAYBE people were mad at Bush for starting a fake war...just MAYBE. Or, it was a huge conspiracy (LOL - RIIIGGGHHHTTT)
Kay7271 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Kay7271
"MAYBE people were mad at Bush for starting a fake war."
You're a dumbass.
You just exposed yourself as a hypocrite, by the way. People are just as mad at Obama for what they feel he has done wrong. The difference is, their outrage is based in reality.
realnarutoboy 1 year ago
@realnarutoboy You assume I speak pro-Obama, and that is just how biased and hateful you are. Again, anyone not with you is against you. Must be sad to go through life that paranoid.
Kay7271 1 year ago
@realnarutoboy Who is flagging your posts? Are you doing it yourself to make it look like me? Or is there someone else in here? Why do your posts say "spam"? It isn't me, anyways, I allow for all discussion, no matter whether they act like a two year old or not.
Kay7271 1 year ago
@Kay7271
First you accuse Zo of deleting the negative posts (something he rarely ever does -- in fact, the only time I've ever seen him delete a post was when a leftist spammed the n-word all over the place, and most of the time he won't even delete that), now you accuse me of labeling my own posts as spam. You're demented.
realnarutoboy 1 year ago
@realnarutoboy I could be wrong - that is the beauty of sanity - we don't just insist we are right no matter what, like you.
Kay7271 1 year ago
@Kay7271
One more thing. You say you listened to Stewart's speech. Well how about you go and listen to Glenn Becks speech on the mall. After all, this whole comedic rally was done fo no other reason but to mock the restoring honor rally.
You know, the one that wasn't political, honored our military, brought Jews, Christians, and Muslims together in prayer, prayed for our president, congress, and country, and donated 5 million dollars to the wounded warriors fund.
Eterna1Soldier 1 year ago 2
@Kay7271
In fact, what exactly do you think you accomplished when you went there? Seriously, what did you guys do to "promote tolerance"? You guys just held up a bunch of offensive signs insulting other people you disagree with and their faith. You guys listened to music. You guys did "the wave" with Adam Savage for no reason at all.
Glenn's rally actually stood for something - true tolerance, faith in God and each other, and restoring honor. This mock rally was just that, blatant mockery.
Eterna1Soldier 1 year ago 2
@Eterna1Soldier You are bias. I have seen Glen Beck's speech. I have watched Glen Beck say very smart things, and then I have also watched him directly contradict himself on the same day from morning to night. They are all crazed, and you are just not a very nice person, period. I am sooo glad I went to that rally...there are some really n