Hi bud, its because the propeller is above the center. would work if you put it at the 3/4 point and used similar to an airboat, with rudders + an an elevator..
then again it doesnt look like theres much of an airfoil ob those wings :-o
for sure it wont fly cuz it over weight and u need to put wheels to give it more power and try to put a less weight things and more power stuff well i see in 1:48 u did put wheels put if u saw when he was moving it it was falling from the head cuz that would make it fly u need put stuff in the wings maybe it will help and try to not put alot of stuff in the head and make it not heavy well in 3:50 u made the wings bigger and more heavier u need to get bigger body not wings anyway good luck dave
ok... use some physics, and you'll definitely get it off of the ground. oh wait you cant. Not with it having more drag and weight than thrust and lift... its too bulky. Take it back to the drawing board...
The thrust line is too high; that it tends to bring the nose down. It wont take the aircraft up. If you do need it to go up; you'd need huge downforce from the tail; which wont happen again because the tail plane is small and I dont even know if it moves ?!
ok carve out the spots where the componets are it will get rid of weight an help with the aerodynamics an also the wing is way to big but maybe if you moved the fuselage to thhe back part of the wing an hot glue it into place it will fly but dont make it to tale heavy eather or it will just stall out.........
No matter which angle you put the propeller at using the servos, there is always a huge induced pitch down moment near the CG. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that it won't fly!
but remove the servos under the motor and put them for elevators and rudder or one for the aerliones and elevators at the same time and one for the rudder and place the servos no either sides of the fuselage on top of the wings to maintain balance and use the smalest brushless motor you can find and pack th components inside and a more powerfull battery pack and try toreduce weight
Of course it would fly if he did that, thats basically turning it into NORMAL plane...... He knows what he's doing, he is one of the pioneers of rc flight and is just EXPERIMENTING with making something nobody has tried.
How much does it weigh? How big is the wing surface area? Find both and calculate the wing loading, and compare it to other foamies... see if it's even capable of flying first.
Then calculate the amount of thrust you have... compare it to gross weight and figure out power-to-weight and its correlation to your wing loading.
After that comes figuring out the air flow, aerodynamics, weight balance, etc.
That is such a good idea but such a useless airframe! I doubt the second one will fly; it needs a longer fuselage. That would be awesome with a bigger airframe and the electronics sunk into it so they don't provide air resistance. I reckon it would be great on a depron delta airframe as a pusher.
put the motor in FRONT, if you put it on TOP it will create a push that will push the plane FORWARD and DOWN, if you put it on bottom it will push UP, then you will have a problem controlling it as it will be very prone to flips. my suggestion is to put the motor in front, there might be a bit of corkscrew twist, but you can calibrate the aeriloins to compensate.
I have recently decided to do about the same thing, but with a foamy from Hobby Lobby that has a 4.5 foot wingspan. It is extra floaty on its own, so weight in the front for pure gliding was a must. I would try something that size, as the large wing area seems perfect for supporting the gear that you have installed on this one. Ill try to make a video of mine and post it.
Totally out of balance due to location of the prop/motor, which cause excessive in-plane rotation. This should be located in-line with the center of wings an fuselage.
Anyone ever try and check for CG??? I guess, if you have nothing better to waste your time on...why not do this! No need to see if the new one flys....I think I know the outcome.
Also... stick with the smaller wing and try increasing the dihedral, and/or the length of the wing without increasing the width. Getting the dihedral and wing length right can be a tricky business even if you have the proper formulas to calculate it with, so don't expect any record-breaking or stable flights. Also keep in mind that vectered thrust isn't going to be as efficient using a prop, and also that with your wing shape you will get stalls rather easily. --KP, Boeing Aircraft Corp.
Your main problem is that you have too much kit disrupting the airflow over vertical and horizontile stabilizer. If you put it all underneath the aircraft and perhaps place landing gear on the front so that the prop will clear, you'll get it off the ground without a problem.
please read my post on part 1 to see why this plane doesnt fly if you want to make a plane for yourself peops :D as i think the pointers i give are essentials!
i think it would have a better chance of flying if the wings were on the top, because i think that when the wings are on the top the plane would be more flotier, not sure about that but if it doesnt fly wit wings on bottom, try top
i tried this with a rc car guts and used a 9 volt for power it didnt have enough power so i got four small motors from those tiny air hogs planes spliced the wires and it had enough trust to make it fly but the cicut board fried befire i got it up in the air i had a ruder and everything to bad i cut out the middle part of the wings and all the components were inside the plane so it almost looked right out of the plastic
im sorry to say professor herbert that the drag coefficient along with the wing area will not allow that airplane to take to the sky,,, OH LORD WHERE DID MY MOTUH COME FROM .. LOL
hey i was about to say bigger wingspan when u said it on the video... lol i say a nicer brushless and maybe cut the throws down for control on the motor!.... cool though... i cant wait to see if it will fly...
Infinitely Variable Vectored Thrust. I love it! I definitely think the third one will have the best chance. Looks like it might glide at least a bit. We'll see!
With the prop so far above the wing and the tail boom being so short it has no choice but to dive. The second version would have had a better chance if you had made the wings sweep back and junked the fuselage and mounted the prop directly on the wing.
@NightFlyyer Its odd though, it doesn't look balanced to me. The last design shown looked a lot better, but you'll have to take into account the vertical balance too. Anything top heavy will roll over quite easily and might become unflyable even though it might 'soar'. At least... that's in theory.
I like to play and experiment personally. And remember, if you try everything logical, and still fail...the only possible answer is illogical. I live by that rule.
Nice! That is so cool! Don't give up! Make it fly! xD By the way, do you have a video on how to make your own RC plane? I would like to do that. It's just that I don't know what I need to make an RC plane. I hope it flys next video! I'd love to see it fly.
Heck..just put a new fuse on there and install the motor on the inside like a normal airplane...yah it takes the fun out of it, but thats the only way its going to fly normaly I think...but will see
what uggly thing is this? you need a plane to make it flies... sorry, but I think you don´t need to try new experiments... you have a lot of planes to fly... lol..
Dave what are you doing? is too heavy and with all those controls in the to the aerodinamid is just not worcking look at the airplane it self the wings are too short to suport the airchraft weight and it wount flie
you need to get the wind from the prop acting on the wings. lift is created from a pressure difference along the wings which is based on the lift coefficient and the speed of the air getting full contact with the wings, having the prop that far above the wings gets no wind contact on the wing span itself. without the air speed from the prop the best you can hope for is an extended glider.
your like orvill and wilber wright of the rc world. how about trying a pusher prop from the back . they say if you throw enough ---- aginst the wall somethings bound to stick. I AM NOT SAYING YOUR THROWING ---- but you get the idea . . love your vids thanks.
I still dont think you'll get off the ground. the idea is right but things like the height of the motor the over sized wing underpowered motor...keeping Dave
It think there's a real chance it will fly...it has a profiled wing now, i guess dave will watch out for balance to be alright. It wont fly perfectly, it'll be veeery twitchy -but it will certainly stay in the air sufficiently long enough to call it "flying".
I think as long as you heed the warning on those "No Step" decals (ha! ha!) it will fly! I want to see you put a set of wings and a motor on an empty Kleenex box and get that up in the air. Now there's a challenge! =)
I was wrong then as i thought the first one was going to fly lol,will this fly?? you got me there but i would say not enough power as the wings look heavy to me but who knows,a man with your background can get just about anything to fly in my book so good luck and i can't wait till the next video know lol,5*
I have to wait even longer to see the results than watching the normal 6-8 commercials like on TV... Yeah, the suspense is killing me too, Dave! I hope you make Part 3 very soon!
What if you were able to put a whole new motor and prop on the nose of the plane to pull it along and get it to fly and add your contraption to the rear of the plane and let it become your rudder and elevator and such.... hmmmm.......
all i can say is that you need the big foamy wings. it'll fly then. 1 50A GWS EDF w/3s 500mah makes a 4' wal-mart foamy fly off of 2 5g servos and 1 corona 6ch rx and ics100 esc.
I doubt the final plane will fly. The wings are gonna be waayyyy too heavy. Maybe if you figured out a way to mill out pockets in the wing, it would work. We shall see, now wont we!
I put a good effort into trying to RC one of those planes and I didnt have much luck either, but I did do really well converting the 4.5' wingspan ones.
will it fly
that is the question
taltigolt 1 month ago
it would make a good drifter
bashardabst 1 month ago
about the strawberries,you made me want to eat it
josh60943 1 month ago
Where is the next segment?
ssonic116 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
it's ugly as shit..
VictimVideos 2 months ago
Hi bud, its because the propeller is above the center. would work if you put it at the 3/4 point and used similar to an airboat, with rudders + an an elevator..
then again it doesnt look like theres much of an airfoil ob those wings :-o
Me102288 2 months ago
you need to upgrade the motor to fly the plane
hamstergangster196 2 months ago
its to heavy on the front thats why the plane cant fly
hamstergangster196 2 months ago
My daughter and I are enjoying so much of your experiment!! Thank you so much!!
kunsikl 3 months ago
but will it blend? lol
TheDarkClanVidz 3 months ago
for sure it wont fly cuz it over weight and u need to put wheels to give it more power and try to put a less weight things and more power stuff well i see in 1:48 u did put wheels put if u saw when he was moving it it was falling from the head cuz that would make it fly u need put stuff in the wings maybe it will help and try to not put alot of stuff in the head and make it not heavy well in 3:50 u made the wings bigger and more heavier u need to get bigger body not wings anyway good luck dave
AmirTayelVEVO 4 months ago
u need rudder control screw the moving propeller and put a moter in the tail
improvised239 4 months ago
the CG is on the tail, you have to put it on the midle.
william44surf 4 months ago
ok... use some physics, and you'll definitely get it off of the ground. oh wait you cant. Not with it having more drag and weight than thrust and lift... its too bulky. Take it back to the drawing board...
weignerg 5 months ago
It wont fly, But will it blend?
schroldgames 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
your fuckin retarded
ibetdougiecan3 7 months ago
your fuckin retarded
ibetdougiecan3 7 months ago
Hollow out the body and cut down on the shit fukin with the airflow and you would have 1000x more stability
samljer 8 months ago
where did you get the reciver and transmeter from
abhinavapillai 8 months ago
its because the motors to far up over the plane
c43939 9 months ago
look like 911 to me.
toomyzoom4 9 months ago
lol
AljoProduction 11 months ago
fly a paper plane would be ok..
roijasonlagunzad 11 months ago
How much time have you got left on this Planet?
AClarke2007 11 months ago
Hey look I made an RC glider!!
*throws it*
See i told you i could make a RC car!
TheRoncopeel 11 months ago
The thrust line is too high; that it tends to bring the nose down. It wont take the aircraft up. If you do need it to go up; you'd need huge downforce from the tail; which wont happen again because the tail plane is small and I dont even know if it moves ?!
keithroche2 1 year ago
ok carve out the spots where the componets are it will get rid of weight an help with the aerodynamics an also the wing is way to big but maybe if you moved the fuselage to thhe back part of the wing an hot glue it into place it will fly but dont make it to tale heavy eather or it will just stall out.........
BrickMyPSP 1 year ago
What happend to the Kyosho T-33? That's where the bigger wing came from, correct?
flanker271 1 year ago
No matter which angle you put the propeller at using the servos, there is always a huge induced pitch down moment near the CG. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that it won't fly!
flanker271 1 year ago
0:35 hahhahahahahahhahahahahhahahahah
kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
EPIC FAIL
GustavoRodrigo15 1 year ago
that looks heavy
funzz1 1 year ago
needs wind because its A GLIDER
Thenonsilentninja 1 year ago
needs bigger wings
il2sturmovikfb 1 year ago
IMFHO: the first version: no airfoil on wings will never fly. the one with big wings first check CG or U will waste Ur time
walkandlookup 1 year ago
wow. you make this whole project and then "however that will work i dont know. hahahahaha.
chrismofer 1 year ago
no
SuperHOTrains 1 year ago
At least it makes a good car.
Zvesda 1 year ago
type gift before youtube and hit enter to win prices
linurd 1 year ago
he looks like hitler XD
willsgotbeer 1 year ago
LOL!!!! HUGE WINGS!!
EPIKLolzer 1 year ago
The engine is positioned too high on the plane, making it unstable, even if it could fly
I would redesign it to place the engine on the abdomen or the rear.
youtship 1 year ago
put your motor at the CG location
TheAircraftmechanic 1 year ago
It needs more electricity.. It took a whole lightining bolt for Frankensteins monster..
icu123abc 1 year ago
he looks like hitler
Maxh0506 1 year ago
The wings should have been over carriage.
methos319 1 year ago
the wings are to smal
ghostman982 1 year ago
you can make everything fly. your a genius did you know that?
ciukcia98 1 year ago
stop the PORN MUSIC!!
NorwegianBoy94 1 year ago
u should put some wheels on and make it a rc place
superpowers1234 1 year ago
You need a larger wing area .Too much weight. The motor is positioned poorly for even thrust.
helicrashpro 1 year ago
You need a larger wing area .Too much weight
helicrashpro 1 year ago
Bert Rutan is rooting for you!!
3shacks1house 1 year ago
i got a bigger glider 2ft winpan im modding it to look kindof like a 737.
Kpilot786457 1 year ago
wing is 2 small for those heavy electronics and the wing has not airflow
heberorozco 1 year ago
the thing that the motor pulls is better
but remove the servos under the motor and put them for elevators and rudder or one for the aerliones and elevators at the same time and one for the rudder and place the servos no either sides of the fuselage on top of the wings to maintain balance and use the smalest brushless motor you can find and pack th components inside and a more powerfull battery pack and try toreduce weight
0111649116 1 year ago
@0111649116
Of course it would fly if he did that, thats basically turning it into NORMAL plane...... He knows what he's doing, he is one of the pioneers of rc flight and is just EXPERIMENTING with making something nobody has tried.
tman120120 1 year ago
the second flight dont take off on the ground XD
sidman172 1 year ago
I love these video-clips! Hilariously full of playfulness and humor - awesome!!!
gpette3 1 year ago
form follows function. if u make it look like it will fly the it should fly right?
emmet011 1 year ago
send me this plane and ill convert it to rc and make it fly and i wont give up. ill document it and put it up on youtube.
magicmike1122 1 year ago
I guess the centre of thrust is too far above the centre of drag, so it'll always tend to nose down when you apply the power.
doobedoo22 1 year ago
i laughed so much at 4:19 that my ass fell off .....litteraly
jackuserjack 1 year ago
A Canard Mt Herbet A Canard!!!!!!!!!!!
lilgreg95 1 year ago
all board the fail plane.
Cakemanx3 1 year ago
i think the plane itself is in bad shape to fly. not the power.
PLISKEN12 1 year ago
How much does it weigh? How big is the wing surface area? Find both and calculate the wing loading, and compare it to other foamies... see if it's even capable of flying first.
Then calculate the amount of thrust you have... compare it to gross weight and figure out power-to-weight and its correlation to your wing loading.
After that comes figuring out the air flow, aerodynamics, weight balance, etc.
thechoosendude 1 year ago
That is such a good idea but such a useless airframe! I doubt the second one will fly; it needs a longer fuselage. That would be awesome with a bigger airframe and the electronics sunk into it so they don't provide air resistance. I reckon it would be great on a depron delta airframe as a pusher.
ubermarklar 1 year ago
If you don't like your pet cat, this would be a good way to get him out of the house. :-)
GeneDunno 1 year ago
change the position of the motor..
pakvanjdam 1 year ago
lol fail
jiuop 1 year ago
Your new wing is too heavy. Won't fly. :)
Squog 1 year ago
u look like freakin adolf hitler
fruitysqueezer 1 year ago
The center of thrust is way too high!!!
NSchnatter190 1 year ago
That would make for a neat powerboat though. xD
PHeMoX 1 year ago
needs more lift
TheEdh13 1 year ago
Well at least it can slide across the floor!
EDCgearreviews 1 year ago
I could help you make this fly! strap a grenade to it and blow the fucker to kingdom come!
hazzelarator 2 years ago 16
@hazzelarator lol hell yeah
SQUIRALBOY43 1 year ago
hahaha, rare and funny wait yo waste your time jajaja
chuchito0 2 years ago
cg wayyyyyyyyy out. not enough wing area for mass... drag... try the weed thing !)
hocksinner 2 years ago
use a more powerfull motor at the back faceing backwoulds
tongting123 2 years ago
stady airodainamik!!!
DimonVDA 2 years ago
why not steering with a servo ?
christiaan12nl 2 years ago
Lol dude u ruined a perfectly good 2$ foam plane you would get a better fly out of it with out all that extra junk
TakinYoCup 2 years ago
it´s very crazy
asker412 2 years ago
hey at least you're not sitting on a couch smoking weed... or..?
trab1925 2 years ago 2
maybe he should ...
doldei 2 years ago
put the motor in FRONT, if you put it on TOP it will create a push that will push the plane FORWARD and DOWN, if you put it on bottom it will push UP, then you will have a problem controlling it as it will be very prone to flips. my suggestion is to put the motor in front, there might be a bit of corkscrew twist, but you can calibrate the aeriloins to compensate.
jesusfreak900x 2 years ago
maybe if you use a more powerful motor and put the motor in the front it will work
jackuserjack 2 years ago
try the engine under neath
redgaridose 2 years ago 2
put a even bigger motor on it!
nunvikingsofthesea 2 years ago 4
course it wont fly....have you actually looked at it????
workers99 2 years ago 24
and now lets find out:
Will it blend , or won't it!
on blendtec!
marinerheart 2 years ago 3
needs way more motor. I predict a tip stall nose dive from the get-go.
Ispintechno1 2 years ago
too heavy
aboogie123456 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
watch my videos of the micro flyers too
is the f-18 iron man and razor r/c plane
fly even better than this one and more fun
cost$20 for new
wtf000000000000 2 years ago
i love it!
maurpine 2 years ago 2
SUBED
Isuckatpaintball2 2 years ago
@ 2:20 "i think it wanted to take off..." LMFAO oh damn that was funny
ProductionDesignrMAX 2 years ago
I have recently decided to do about the same thing, but with a foamy from Hobby Lobby that has a 4.5 foot wingspan. It is extra floaty on its own, so weight in the front for pure gliding was a must. I would try something that size, as the large wing area seems perfect for supporting the gear that you have installed on this one. Ill try to make a video of mine and post it.
jman5630 2 years ago
everything but the motor is to small and not streamlined enough.
also the wings need to be sanded into a profile.
jasmine2501 and RCSonicjet are right about motor placement.
0MoTheG 2 years ago
the wings are to small for the body to lift!!!!!SIMPLE
hasanjohnh 2 years ago
its too heavy.....
derderpaintballguy 2 years ago 3
you should put wheels on it and i will be a plane car
100randomthings 2 years ago
have your tried tiling the motor down instead of up? the plane itself is already made to be on plane,, so shouldnt you tild it down? just an opinion
LILPICKUPMAN 2 years ago
Have I missed the follow up to this one? I haven't seen it posted unless I've missed it! I've been waiting to see if the new design works or not.
I hope Dave hasn't forgotten about this one! lol
mlthomp1981 2 years ago
needs more rudder!
dubspins 2 years ago
cut a strip out of it so the air goes through the plane not around it
smartguy13v 2 years ago
when is part 3 coming out?
nunvikingsofthesea 2 years ago
Not enought tail surface and cg looks all out of whack.
taofledermaus 2 years ago
put some wheels on it when its on the ground(make a car)
splotman114 2 years ago 2
Totally out of balance due to location of the prop/motor, which cause excessive in-plane rotation. This should be located in-line with the center of wings an fuselage.
Geovanniv 2 years ago
Anyone ever try and check for CG??? I guess, if you have nothing better to waste your time on...why not do this! No need to see if the new one flys....I think I know the outcome.
DG121480 2 years ago
lol there is a good reason why we dont put the engines in top of the cockpit
wowpaladin10 2 years ago
put more power and put weight on the back
RAJKUMAR1609 2 years ago
youll get good results for "crash landing"
1a2d3a4m34 2 years ago
A little better airfoiling might help....
JRBeaman 2 years ago
i think he needs more lift at the back...
1a2d3a4m34 2 years ago
lol, nice try any way.
bbrmotosports 2 years ago
you need a wayyyyyy larger vertical stabelizer
jomo35davas 2 years ago
Also... stick with the smaller wing and try increasing the dihedral, and/or the length of the wing without increasing the width. Getting the dihedral and wing length right can be a tricky business even if you have the proper formulas to calculate it with, so don't expect any record-breaking or stable flights. Also keep in mind that vectered thrust isn't going to be as efficient using a prop, and also that with your wing shape you will get stalls rather easily. --KP, Boeing Aircraft Corp.
QuiglysMom 2 years ago
Your main problem is that you have too much kit disrupting the airflow over vertical and horizontile stabilizer. If you put it all underneath the aircraft and perhaps place landing gear on the front so that the prop will clear, you'll get it off the ground without a problem.
QuiglysMom 2 years ago
It looks way too heavy, and those tiny gliders barely fly as gliders. nice vid though.
luciferq7 2 years ago
please read my post on part 1 to see why this plane doesnt fly if you want to make a plane for yourself peops :D as i think the pointers i give are essentials!
0n3m1s1s0 2 years ago
definitely need a bigger vertical stabilizer/elevator with all that drag
boman4444 2 years ago
i think it would have a better chance of flying if the wings were on the top, because i think that when the wings are on the top the plane would be more flotier, not sure about that but if it doesnt fly wit wings on bottom, try top
RacerLamboMurcie18 2 years ago
i tried this with a rc car guts and used a 9 volt for power it didnt have enough power so i got four small motors from those tiny air hogs planes spliced the wires and it had enough trust to make it fly but the cicut board fried befire i got it up in the air i had a ruder and everything to bad i cut out the middle part of the wings and all the components were inside the plane so it almost looked right out of the plastic
crazycool25 2 years ago
im sorry to say professor herbert that the drag coefficient along with the wing area will not allow that airplane to take to the sky,,, OH LORD WHERE DID MY MOTUH COME FROM .. LOL
cutter043 2 years ago
hey i was about to say bigger wingspan when u said it on the video... lol i say a nicer brushless and maybe cut the throws down for control on the motor!.... cool though... i cant wait to see if it will fly...
superfish99 2 years ago
Ha, ha gonna leave us hangin a bit!
BigRickSharpe 2 years ago
Infinitely Variable Vectored Thrust. I love it! I definitely think the third one will have the best chance. Looks like it might glide at least a bit. We'll see!
moolikeacow2 2 years ago
face it, it was doomed from the begining...
lol
dodykid4ever 2 years ago
With the prop so far above the wing and the tail boom being so short it has no choice but to dive. The second version would have had a better chance if you had made the wings sweep back and junked the fuselage and mounted the prop directly on the wing.
macrumpton 2 years ago
what so that we can get a flying wing instead of an airplane.
TylerReifenberger5 2 years ago
Remember folks, this is the man who successfully subbed a pie dish for a heli tail rotor!
This contraption will fly.
scienceguy22 2 years ago
all that and didnt get to see it 1 star lol no 5/5
outlaw662sr 2 years ago
that would be cool if it could fly!!!
huntcampfishMN 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
u put a battery on the back that weighs a fucking ton of course it would crash
bendover90 2 years ago
It was balanced perfectly on the CG, hence the reason it was back there. It was no accident.
NightFlyyer 2 years ago 3
@NightFlyyer Its odd though, it doesn't look balanced to me. The last design shown looked a lot better, but you'll have to take into account the vertical balance too. Anything top heavy will roll over quite easily and might become unflyable even though it might 'soar'. At least... that's in theory.
Interesting videos nonetheless!!
PHeMoX 1 year ago
When i watch this it seems to me like you have no experience with Airplanes but you have
Scooty9794 2 years ago
I like to play and experiment personally. And remember, if you try everything logical, and still fail...the only possible answer is illogical. I live by that rule.
NightFlyyer 2 years ago 5
@NightFlyyer so if i cant make a plane fly, i wrap it in duct tape and it will fly?
heavnhel 1 year ago
Nice! That is so cool! Don't give up! Make it fly! xD By the way, do you have a video on how to make your own RC plane? I would like to do that. It's just that I don't know what I need to make an RC plane. I hope it flys next video! I'd love to see it fly.
undertake782 2 years ago
try a stronger engine and put the center of gravity bewind the wings
DarkTuga96 2 years ago
put a bigger engine on that thing
nunvikingsofthesea 2 years ago
Heck..just put a new fuse on there and install the motor on the inside like a normal airplane...yah it takes the fun out of it, but thats the only way its going to fly normaly I think...but will see
AirForcef18 2 years ago
what uggly thing is this? you need a plane to make it flies... sorry, but I think you don´t need to try new experiments... you have a lot of planes to fly... lol..
EduBrasil2007 2 years ago
i think you must read bernoulli hydrodinamics cool stuffs great experiment ! i hope can fly
Criptografo 2 years ago
Dave what are you doing? is too heavy and with all those controls in the to the aerodinamid is just not worcking look at the airplane it self the wings are too short to suport the airchraft weight and it wount flie
305abnormal 2 years ago
Yup. Too much down thrust and not enough power. But it is better than before.
RockinRobbins13 2 years ago
Hey Dave, no cheating with the wing. =P
jk, keep it up!
scolen3 2 years ago
thats a brilliant idea for a motor mounting.
tomterahedrob 2 years ago
dave keep it up lets get a flight out of this?
allgunzsblazen 2 years ago
Have you tried using blades instead of wings to make a lawn mower?
only joking..
Remember if it can glide without power it will fly with power. Try making a glider first.
cybersurg 2 years ago
you need to get the wind from the prop acting on the wings. lift is created from a pressure difference along the wings which is based on the lift coefficient and the speed of the air getting full contact with the wings, having the prop that far above the wings gets no wind contact on the wing span itself. without the air speed from the prop the best you can hope for is an extended glider.
epilogue777 2 years ago
your like orvill and wilber wright of the rc world. how about trying a pusher prop from the back . they say if you throw enough ---- aginst the wall somethings bound to stick. I AM NOT SAYING YOUR THROWING ---- but you get the idea . . love your vids thanks.
billgetsmail1 2 years ago
I liked the second version. It looked as though it was paddling around the ground trying to get up. I look forward to the next trial Dave.
5 Stars ~ Eric
joehandsome99 2 years ago
if it would work that would be tight but for now it's just an idea
locoleroco 2 years ago
I still dont think you'll get off the ground. the idea is right but things like the height of the motor the over sized wing underpowered motor...keeping Dave
flyingfutaba 2 years ago
rotate the motor up 90 degrees, then put the entire pitching motor system on the back. Nice thrust vectoring unit :P
Styreta 2 years ago
haha, sure was a nice 'ground glider', don't give up Dave, I'm pretty sure you will succeed somehow with this experiment !
beverke7 2 years ago
It think there's a real chance it will fly...it has a profiled wing now, i guess dave will watch out for balance to be alright. It wont fly perfectly, it'll be veeery twitchy -but it will certainly stay in the air sufficiently long enough to call it "flying".
mauersegler79 2 years ago
i don't think the second version will fly
bladeflyer7 2 years ago
they look like p-51 wings
, i think it need more power and plus i think it may need to be balanced
konohasblackjet 2 years ago
It will not fly because the motors thrust line is way to high and is pushing the nose down.
If the motor was on the nose it would fly.
RCSonicjet 2 years ago
your correct my friend :)
airlinerdude12 2 years ago
I think as long as you heed the warning on those "No Step" decals (ha! ha!) it will fly! I want to see you put a set of wings and a motor on an empty Kleenex box and get that up in the air. Now there's a challenge! =)
SoCalsandman780 2 years ago
I was wrong then as i thought the first one was going to fly lol,will this fly?? you got me there but i would say not enough power as the wings look heavy to me but who knows,a man with your background can get just about anything to fly in my book so good luck and i can't wait till the next video know lol,5*
startazz 2 years ago
I have to wait even longer to see the results than watching the normal 6-8 commercials like on TV... Yeah, the suspense is killing me too, Dave! I hope you make Part 3 very soon!
stot2614 2 years ago
damn the suspense is killing me! im really no expert but the tail looks a bit short. great vid.
dangerousprimate 2 years ago
What if you were able to put a whole new motor and prop on the nose of the plane to pull it along and get it to fly and add your contraption to the rear of the plane and let it become your rudder and elevator and such.... hmmmm.......
azh01e 2 years ago
all i can say is that you need the big foamy wings. it'll fly then. 1 50A GWS EDF w/3s 500mah makes a 4' wal-mart foamy fly off of 2 5g servos and 1 corona 6ch rx and ics100 esc.
omendesign 2 years ago
dave i dont watch soaps for the same reason i dont like the suspence plz make the vid soon and maby try two of those servo set ups one on each wing
dnutt1985 2 years ago
I doubt the final plane will fly. The wings are gonna be waayyyy too heavy. Maybe if you figured out a way to mill out pockets in the wing, it would work. We shall see, now wont we!
girrocks12345 2 years ago
a very interesting concept indeed
however me thinks it will nee more power to pull it
i think if you had a motor or even 2 motors for thrust and that pivoting motor for steering it would fly
i do belive it will fly but as you said its a case of experimenting with difrent ideas
i would stick with the puller prop as the pusher migh want to bring the nose down
the puller prop should pull it up
anyhoos good luck with that :)
puggster 2 years ago
i think it has to short tail
bugijs123 2 years ago
I put a good effort into trying to RC one of those planes and I didnt have much luck either, but I did do really well converting the 4.5' wingspan ones.
Nuetron9 2 years ago
the second wing is way too big for that little motor and prop,too much drag
Nickydoodledoo 2 years ago
I'm thinking that it's too hevy to fly.
subocito 2 years ago
good try dave, but those things barly "fly" without all the extra weight!!!! good luck Eric
ericdamexican 2 years ago
You need a more dihedral wing for more stability
3DRCFOAMY 2 years ago