Liz was wrong Iran does care about their elections and the direction they are going. The root to this is we don't want our kids fighting any wars for the elite their lives are worth more than barrels of oil. If you let oil men run your country you get greasy tactics, justifying torture. I want to be proud of my country I love my country but I do without the elite that are tooling US.
They have to brainwash us into this fear so the private contractors can (continue to) line their pockets with OUR precious tax dollars. No more CEOs running the land of the "free" from private bunkers. And labels just obscure the truth from our eyes while dividing us up.
Jonah Goldberg has a great book out called "Liberal Fascism" where he makes a very good case for why the liberal left (e.g. Leesa) are the true fascists. Classical liberalism which stands for individual liberty is lost for this public education-schooled generation. Liberals are unable to argue reasonably without resorting to derision, name-calling, and the ignoring of facts.
I love this Woman, I want to marry her... She makes more sense than anyone right now making the rounds. Liz is great. You libs, you need to pay attention.
Hi Liz... didn't know you had a YouTube account. Nice to see you... but I still think you have all the info wrong... and your reasoning is circuitous crap... and O"Donnell made you look like the foolish ass-sucking apologist that you are... and besides... You're just the offspring of the Devil... that alone doesn't mean anyone should take you seriously.
I'm always amazed at the level of hatred in the hearts of liberals. Liberals have always tried to spoon feed the rest of us that we should be tolerant abd understanding of other people. So, I have to conclude, Leesa, that you are the true shining example of everything liberals stand for. The real truth is, you are a fascist that resides within a fascist party. It's the left that wear brown shirts, not the right. So, let me suggest, you go get an education and learn what you have become.
Besides being a sanctimonious ass... it's pretty funny the way you Faux Christians turn the Bible around to suit your fancy.
The little part that Moses said god said to him about "Thou Shalt Not Kill," doesn't have a little asterix next to it. It doesn't say "Don't Kill Unless Of Course You have this Sadistic Need to Torture Someone."
Let me suggest something... no.. I better not, you'll just feign indignance and moral superiority.
I don't know if I should pitty you or be happy you're so terribly tortured within your inferiorirty complex... Trying so hard to believe you're so much more than you really are. In any case, pay attention little girl, the Bible says, "Thou shalt not murder." So, when you see Islamic terrorists murder innocent Americans, you should know that enhanced interrogations prevented more innocent Americans from being murdered. Maybe they even saved you, who knows. Wait, am I allowed to say terrorists?
Hahahaha. Funny, but sickening. You truely are liberal to the core. No point in arguing when your opponent isn't altogether sane. I have to admit that you are extremely effective at spewing your hate propaganda - I'm sure it's truely inspiring to other America-hating leftists.
I changed my mind. I do have a suggestion for you. Look up "Fascism" and tell me how I'm a fascist?
Next time get to know a word before you use it.
And as for "tolerance." I may be a Progressive but I am defiantly intolerant of intolerance - especially when the Mormon freaks spend Millions to stop Gays from having the same Rights as them - and then claim that their "rights" are being abused.
On the other hand, I believe the judgmental Mormons and I should have the same Rights.
I'll try this again... Like I said, you are a fascist, you can't help it... all liberals are fascist. Libs try to make anti gay lifestyle expressions illegal hate speech. The left does everything from throwing things at conservatives who speak in Universities to trying to silence talk radio through the fairness doctrine. YES, you are fascists. Ironically, American warriors risk their lives to protect your rights as you try to take away my rights of free speech.
I'm serious when I say it, Liberalism is definitely a mental disorder. Some kind of self loathing, built in guilt thing. They're feeling guilty for their very being, just for existing. It's a shame! This is why they blame America for the worlds problems. We shouldn't be allowed to live a better life than in other places, they're guilty over that. The US is causing global warming, guilt. Whites alone are racists, solely responsible for slavery, they carry that with them every day. Feeling guilty
Liz Cheney wins every time in these interviews. Where has she been all this time? She needs to run for office. This reporter was bumbling around ineffectively trying to pin her down, but she bested him at every turn.... because she has the truth on her side, and it's clear.
So we are supposed to keep gitmo open forever or until the last terrorist dies? That could be expensive and not too conservative IMO. We got prisoners in America that are way worse than any terrorist at gitmo. If we let them loose in some of our prisons, they would be killed.
Dick Cheney was on spot in that speech! Obama is leaking intel into the national public which includes terrorists. Obama is headed towards chaos & Socialism - that's REAL CHANGE ALRIGHT"! Bush helped us to remain safe since 9/11. He took the war to THEIR homefront.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The only reason we would want to know where Dick is on this issue is so we know where not to be. If Dick says it's so, then we know is isn't so. If he says its right, then we know it's wrong.
- lets see? the place Gitmo is at? NEVER been "escaped" from! and the effect? KEEPS the looney terrorists AWAY from America! So the EVIDENCE is= good place to keep=EVIL! Omama wants to BRING IT HOME? what a shape-shifter the Dims voted in! on the Sham-pain trail~hes one slogan! ~then as Prez? hes another? and he blamed "President Bush" 28 times? (excuse me didn't he say this was 'change" and "a new day?" seems he has gotten=on=the=blame=train!!! And can't figure out how to GET OFF IT! )seessssh
Omama is a GOOB! and a fraud! and has NOTHING to replace Gitmo! No one will even ADMIT in 4 years they=VOTED for this ignorant looney leftie! Omama=bring evil here? a TERRORIST? And Omama FAILEd to="mention" that a TERROR plot was FOILED the day before? He was a =strutin~pea-brain-cock~ during that diatribe against the Bush/Cheny administration! He has NOTHING to OFFER the USA to keep us "safer"! And rambled on and on and BLAMED & BLAMED! others? Omama needs to FOCUS on=ECONOMY! PLEASE! O=loser
Falsehood 1: 14% of released Gitmo prisoners have returned to the battlefield. Correction; 14% have been suspected of or have returned to the battle field. So in fact less than 14% have actually returned to the battlefield.
Falsehood 2: Criticisms come from Europe. Correction: The majority of Americans are also against Gitmo and support closing this facility.
Right they like creating the strawman of "appeal to europe" as if anything they don't like must be good for us analogy. It wouldn't matter if the entire united states is against something if the international community is also against it then it must be for the best. This is the equivalent of being an isolationist. Pissing off the world and your enemies daily can't possibly be good. Why don't they see this?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Dick Cheny asked for 9/11 to happen when he wrote the "Project for a New American Century" ...... ........... .......... But what I want to know is: What is wrong with approaching terrorism from criminal justice standpoint? ...... Being that most of these terrorist don't have a home country, are they not just international criminals? Instead of enemy troops?
Hey machberserk, Bush, Cheney, and their cronies made a fortune off the war in Iraq. Ever here of Halliburton & KBR. The value of Cheneys holdings went up at least 5 fold since 2003. Not to mention the paybacks by defense contractors and other war profiteers. When are you brainless right wingers going to realize that wars are created to enrich the criminals that start them.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
If right wingers had working brains they would be left wingers. Instead they have dysfunctional distorted brains which makes them very dangerous!!!! Remember, the most right wing political party of the last century was the NAZI party. And look what they gave the world not to mention the destruction of their own country.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
yes, Lablvr, and bush/cheney have destroyed this country as well. In a more suble way. they have destroyed our credibility, our moral imperative and our diplomacy with other countries. They have created hate and divisiveness in this country and they THRIVE on that. Demons for sure.
When it comes to National Defense, particularly against terrorist religious extremists who cannot be reasoned with - it's not about left or right. It shouldn't be politicized at all. That's why Obama has kept Bush's national security programs in place - including enhanced interrogation, wiretaps, the Patriot Act, etc. And that's why not even fellow Democrats will provide funds needed to release the Gitmo prisoners.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
hey Machberserk, you are BERSERK!!! Clueless simpleminded children are the ones who vote for and support right wing criminals like the republicans/Bush/Cheney. In 1999 Bush stated he wanted to invade Iraq. January 2001, 1st meeting at white house Bush asked his people " how can we Attack Iraq!!" Hence, the brush off of Clinton's warnings about Al Quida attackes using commercial aircraft. The facts are there idiots, listen to them instead of your lying, deceiving, asshole right wingers.
Even if the report is true, 1 of 7 released return to the battlefield, that would mean the majority of people released from Gitmo - 86% would never fight again.
Dick Cheney is a LIAR, a criminal and knew about the coming attack on the USA by the terrorists. He and bush planned to get into Iraq before they were elected, then they had a smooth route. LIARS.
HAHAHA. You idiot. So they set up the attacks so that one of the planes would be headed to the White House? Then they started a war because it's fun? I don't see either one of them better off because of Iraq. It's amazing how little logic a child like yourself is capable of using.
You want to talk about corrupt? I see enough of that in the "Stimulous Package". There's so much wasted money in there you could found a small country. And then there's the companies that are being told how to run their business by the government. THAT, my friend, is corruption. And it's in the wide open. Bush and Cheney what? Had the terrorists attack us? To what end I ask.
It wasn't for "fun..." Keep up the disingenuous crap. BushCo and their cronies wanted to start a war with Iraq for years. You never read the PNAC's mission statement?
Why do so many people jump on all the most unlikely reasons that are hidden away somewhere instead of reading what is going on in front of their face. Iraq was invaded to root out a dictator, who intelligence agencies from three separate countries claimed he had weapons of mass destruction. It was no secret that Sadam hated the U.S. And guess what, Sadam is dead now. THAT is why we went there. Not some pre-planned conspiracy BS. Disingenuous, huh? Your ignorance far outweighs your intelligence.
Speaking of Ignorance... Cognitive Dissonance is a form if Ignorance... and yours is obviously infinite. I made my argument. You're response was non-related... and if your statement is true... then Junior lied and we invaded Iraq illegally.
Read the PNAC's Mission Statement... or is that too much Reality in your Fantasy Junior Land?
You're a delusional macaroon... and a proud Comment Thumb Pumper.
My response had direct relation to your belief that the PNAC Mission Statement was the driving motivation behind the Iraq war. Perhaps your lack of intelligence is creating a mental block? I suggest you read again.
I find it funny that you are somehow tying the PNAC statement to the original claim that Bush and Cheney supposedly had terrorists attack us on 911. Rediculous, but I suppose that is how liberals think - if there is a pattern. And if he lied, where is your supportive evidence?
You people are so vile. And so very very profoundly, even comically, stupid. Yes, our former vice prez has 'no business commenting on affairs of State' --- but you do. And lets put "terrorist" in quotes, because we all know there's no such thing. While you morons slept in your mom's basements, you were being protected by Bush, Cheney, and our superb military forces from being blown the fuck up. Listening to liberal ignorance is the most horrific torture on earth.
Well, considering we've yet to be attacked under Obama's administration and suffered the worst terrorist attack in our country's history under Bush and Cheney, I'm not sure how you can say that with a straight face. Many Americans lost family and friends on Sept. 11th - how is that being protected? Oh, right, it only counts *after* the attack....yeeeeah, okay. Who's the moron?
So that means that the last 7 - 8 years we were protected by....who? Obama? Pelosi? Who was it - let me in on the secret. It wasn't the previous Admin that was shaking hands with Tyrants and Communist dictators. Or crying about the rights of known terrorists without valuing the rights of Americans. I'm aware of the lost lives on 9-11,my sister-in-law being one of so many innocent people. But, I'm sure it's the Terrorists who need our sympathy.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
It's a nice tactic to argue that the period of time *after* that fateful attack is all that matters. Wait, I don't mean 'nice,' I mean 'convenient.' At the end of the day, on the record of successful terrorist attacks on American soil, there's no spinning the Obama=0, Bush=1. Sleep well.
I never made that argument . So - it's FDR's fault that Pearl Harbor was attacked too. It's all nicely settled then. Everything's so cut n' dry. It's always the fault of America, Americans, Democracy, Capitalism, maybe Christianity and of course Republicans. It's all clear to me now.
So you're saying because the Bush administration got blindsided by a terrorist attack, and Obama has not, we should feel safer with Obama? I have your answer - You're the moron. How do you imagine an attack can be prevented when nobody is expecting it? The policies put into place after 911 were for the purpose of protecting the American people. Obama sure is effective at tearing them down. Idiot.
No, I was replying to someone else's point of pride about how safe Bush/Cheney kept us, as if the lack of an attack post 9/11 was any more evidence than the fact that an attack happened on their watch. Maybe instead of just calling people moron and idiot on the internet, you read a bit more before first.
Yea... I know who you were replying to. Your rediculous point was that we got attacked on 911, and bush/cheney (who were in office at the time) were not able to prevent it... That would have happened to any president - most definitely including Obama, who does not seem to like anti-terror policies.
The real question is: Why are you focusing on an unforeseeable tragedy that nobody could have altered AND ignoring the preventive measures that have been implemented as a result of its occurrence?
Bush was not blind sided by 911, he was informed of an upcoming terrorist attack by a CIA briefer on August 6 2001 in Crawford, He was shown the memo "Bin Ladin Determined to Strike in US." After hearing the full briefing he told the CIA briefer "All right. You've covered your ass, now."
There were 2 major terror attacks on the Mainland under Bush' watch yet no one has been prosecuted, in fact one attack was not even investigated
The CIA was getting several weekly terrorist threats around that time, and all the way up to 911. Even had he known to act on that particular threat, how could we have prepared for an attack of such proportions without knowing what to expect? With our knowledge back then, I doubt anything except for law enforcement would have been hightened - as with all the pre-991 terror attacks.
And what do you think of all the anti-terror policies that have been put into place as a result of 911? Do you believe they are unnecessary? Bush certainly did alot of things after the attack - if there isn't one you agree with, then you're a hypocritical bush-hating idiot. Even I agree with at least some of what Obama has done so far.
So bitch about everything you think he did wrong and ignore the two countries he's liberated, the fact that he crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, and put nuclear inspectors in Libya, Iran, and North Korea. He also captured a dictator who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people.. Sounds like a decent president to me, if not good. But of course you don't care about those facts... They're too positive for your liking. Dark Ages? You haven't seen anything. It's socialism time; Obama's time!
If the CIA is getting weekly threats and are no doubt telling the Bush administration of such a threat, yet NO action was taken. There was no national security sit down, no leadership from the whitehouse to bring together the various security organizations.
When the planes hit the towers Cheney & Rumsfeld actually thought it was Saddam!!!.
Weekly threats from several anonymous terror organizations - at least back then (i have no idea now). The CIA's job was to sift through them all and try to identify a real threat. The fact that Bush took no action that particular threat should not surprise anyone in post-911 circumstances. Hindsight is 20/20, and DHS didn't exist then..
So let its ok in your book for the CIA to notify the President of an upcoming attack and the PotUS to ignore it? even when the threat points to a group that has already committed suicide attacks against the USS Cole? a group the previous administration said was the worst security threat to the nation!!.
Yet GW Bush in May 2001 was speaking of a missile defence shield as essential to national, is shows the He did not pay ANY attention to the CIA but blindly pushing his own agenda.
You're right, Xdir... Problem is, nobody told that to Clinton after we were attacked by Al Qaeda all through the ninties which ended in 9/11. Maybe you forgot that Clinton could have killed Bin Laden with an UAV but chose not to because he didn't want to upset the Islamic community. Perhaps YOU should have told Clinton to stop treating Al Qaeda as a criminal network and instead declare war on them with the full might of the US military... you know, the way Bush did. You people make me sick!
What are you on about? Clinton had every attack on the US investigated and the perpetrators prosecuted, Al Qaida only committed 1 attack in the Clinton administration (USS Cole), the rest where groups now affiliated but then freelancing with AlQaida.
Al Qaida is a criminal entity, Bush incorrectly raised their status to an army by declaring "war on terror", the Clinton method would have been to send in the Army, kill those who resist and the FBI arrest those who surrender.
This is fascinating to me. To freelance is not the same as affiliation? Wow, talk about denial... but you're wrong anyway, Al Qaeda has been directly responsible for the bombings of our Embassies in Africa, murdered servicemen in Egypt, the USS Cole, and the 1st WTC bombing. Ramzi Yousef trained in Alqaeda training camps in the late 80's, planned for the 1st bombing in 91, did it in 93. His uncle, Khalid Shaikh mohammed funded him. BTW, KSM is the architect of 9/11. It was all Al Qaeda.
As for Al Qaeda being a criminal entity... no, it's not, it's a terrorist group that has declarwed war on the United States. They declared war on us in the 90's, we treated it like a criminal investigation, more Americans died because of that. Bush was exacty right by declaring war on those who attacked us, and have been attacking us. It's a war, ya understand? WAR! We are at war with people who want to end our way of life, and the left gives them sypathy and understanding, blaming us! It's sick
Al Qaida is a criminal entity that has committed mass murder, you dont declare war on criminals.
If war is to be declared on terror then why not also bomb the Neo Nazi's that Timothy McVeigh was linked to? why not get the CIA to locate & terminate the Anthrax attacker?
The diff between right & left is the right is easily scared and over reacts.
The right over reacts? Easilly scared? Actually, the left is soft on national defense, it holds a belief that if you just try to be nice to our enemies, they will somehow come to like us and go away. Sorry, not in the real world. According to you, treating these people like criminals instead of terrorists achieved what exactly? We treated terrorists like criminals in the 90's and we suffered one attack after another... by doing it your way. It didnt work, did it? Wht can't you just admit it?
Clinton did exactly what you're saying we should be doing and we continued to be attacked. Bush declared war on them and we weren't attacked anymore. Tell me, who got it right? Liberalism is a mental disorder, I'm totally convinced. Even when the evidence is as plain as the nose on your face, you refuse to either see it, or admit it. It's a shame.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Clinton prosecuted and successfully convicted them, he even told the Bush Admin that Alqaida was the gravest threat, a warning GW ignored repeatedly costing 3000 live.
GW Bush declared war; spent at least $4 Trillion (1 Afghanistan war, 2 Iraq war & 1 boosting homeland security) and achieved what? 4000 dead soldiers, 35000 wounded & the terrorists are still active.
"we weren't attacked anymore" After the "war on terror" the US was attacked thousands of times!!, just ask the troops in Iraq.
I don't know... could be you're just trying to get under my skin. Could be you're really a colossal jewel of glittering ignorance. In any case, you clearly are incapable of accepting historical fact. You are a typical liberal. It could not be Clintons fault the towers came down, it's Bush's fault. Tell us, what did Bush know that he ignored which would have stopped 9/11 from happening? After all, he was in office a whole 7 months, 11 days before 9/11. In court I might add... enlighten us.
I suggest you use the "find" feature in your browser to search my comments for this video I have already had a debate with Mackberserk on what Bush knew and when.
No search for me, thanks... You can find it and post it yourself. But the truth is, I already know the answer. Liberalism is a catastrophic failure at every level, from the economy to our national defense, it fails everywhere and every time it's tried.
Are you for real? the past 8 years has showed conservatism fail on every aspect of governance, remember 4 of those years had the GOP control the House & Senate.
Failure to prosecute the perpetrators of 2 terror attacks, Katrina, Iraq debacle (4200 dead soldiers & 35000 wounded and Iran is the real winner!!), Economic crisis, the list is endless.
Maybe it's just that you're uninformed. Getting all your news from CNN and PMSNBC is doing you no favors. Now, you bring up Katrina, who is running that state? Who is responsible for the public safety? The Mayor! The Governor can declare a state emergency, but she didn't, and she didn't because she didn't want Bush to get the credit, that's what she said. So Chocolate city Nagan, and the liberal Governor aren't responsible for that debacle, Bush is? That's their job, not Bush's. That's a fact!
Again, it's all dribble from you idiots. Where'd your proof? Where's your evidence to back up these stupid claims you're making? I mean, the idea that the Governor cannot enact a state of emergency when the lev's break because there are no guardsman is ludacris, man! Even if it was true that 40% were over sea's, she still could have used 60% of the force. This is the stupidest thing I ever heard. And you're facts are wrong anyway.
2 terror attacks? No, only 1. You can't even be honest about that! Al Qaeda is busted up in Iraq and Afghanistan, Taliban are on the run, their finances are terribly disrupted. Many of the heads of Al Qaeda are either in jail or dead, Iraqi's are voting again after 30 years of tyranny and pose no more threat to the US directly, or indirectly. Now, you still haven't answered my question about what Bush knew that could have prevented 9/11. I anxiously await you answer.
No, Jr. Only i attacks... Al qaeda managed only 1 attack on American soil after Bush became President. And they tried real hard to attack us after 9/11, but the Patriot act stopped them cold. The guy sending letters was a domestic nutjob. Actually, I prefer to call him a criminal entity, not a terrorist. But reading your posts, I'd have to say you're a dailcos'r, or you spen time on the huffington post. Some left wing kook propaganda blog. You're terribly uninformed... seriously, it's bad.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I said Terrorist not AlQaida, by your logic there was only 1 terrorist attack under the Clinton Admin, Clinton did not implement the tyranny of the Patriot act and he apparently "stopped them cold" He even arrested all those involved and had them incarcerated on US soil without a single breakout.
I don't even know what to say, it's pointless... the left are idiots, that's true, but you kinda bring it to a whole new level. It's almost as if you live in a parallel universe. You make one accusation after another but offer no factual basis for any them. I just watched Osama tell the world he brought the towers down, you idiots say he had nothing to do with that. It's a sickness, liberalism is a mental disorder. The blame America first crowd, America is the reason for all evil in the world.
One more thing, Taliban are on the run. It's true, they're gaining strength in some area's of the country but it's not the entire south, or even most of it. But they are losing, bad in many area's. And isn't it amazing how you lefties give Iran credit for the lack of violence in Iraq. Lol! The surge had nothing to do with it, it's really Iran. Well, keep telling yourself that, fantasy boy. If it makes you feel better, that's OK. Us true Americans know the truth and that's what matters.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I suggest you read up on the real situation in Afghanistan, the Taliban are terrorizing inside Kabul, Karzai controls no more then the presidential palace.
The economy... we have enjoyed the greatest peace time economic growth in global history over the last 7 years. Maybe you forgot that, doubt it. Fanny and Freddie is what caused this economy to dive because of liberal interference. Barny Frank and Chris Dodd should be in prison for their roles in it. Too bad if that bothers you. Tax cuts caused the treasury to take in record tax revenue, never seen anything like.The economy grew every 1/4 and unemployment averaged 4.5%. Liberals are so stupid!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Because it was a BUBBLE!!, there was no real growth, no substance behind the boom, it was all on paper.
Fanny & Freddie did not cause the economy to dive, they augmented it, unlike AIG holding $1 Trillion liabilities on subprime or an out of control CDS market of $50 trillion (thanks to Phil Gramm's deregulation) that were direct causes
Yep! That's half true, Clinton's policies enabled Al Qaeda to attack America roughly once per year. We've had the WTC, Embassies, USS COLE... and a few more attacks during the 90's. So, tell me, what attacks took place in the US since Bush declared war on terrorists? You mean on the battlefield? That's just so lame. Oh, sorry, I thought Al Qaeda was just a criminal entity. How do criminal entities become global threats?
You lefties are really bigger threats to freedom than any terrorist.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Only one attack had taken place on US soil prior to 911 (WTC1) and that was 8 years before GW took office, so the frequency of attacks was rare. The attacks on US forces in the name of AlQaida are almost always by people who did not consider America an enemy until the invasion of Iraq, the "war on terror" has increased the ranks of AlQaida.
AlQaida was considered a criminal entity even in the Arab world until Bush made them "righteous" by calling the "war on terror" a crusade.
Al Qaida is a terrorist group - end of story. There is a distinct difference between a criminal and a terrorist. Criminals commit crimes usually for the purpose of a personal gain - a rational (if extreme) motive that a detective might understand and be able to use for investigative purposes.
A (muslim) terrorist needs no reasonable motive but Allah's will. They just hate America - probably more than many leftists. Clinton was clearly wrong in his decisions regarding terrorism.
KSM did not join Al Qaida until just before the 911 attacks, he was freelance America hater. Ramzi Yousef trained in Al Qaida camps but was not a member of Al Qaida.
Dick Cheney has no business commenting on affairs of state. He will only regain that right after his next "terrorist" attack makes him the de-facto ruler of the US. Hint: nuclear devices have gone missing in transit, under direct supervision of Dicksmack the Terrible.
insanity doesn't fall far from the tree. The Cheney freak show continues.
MrChicokj1 2 years ago
Liz was wrong Iran does care about their elections and the direction they are going. The root to this is we don't want our kids fighting any wars for the elite their lives are worth more than barrels of oil. If you let oil men run your country you get greasy tactics, justifying torture. I want to be proud of my country I love my country but I do without the elite that are tooling US.
rcdavedss 2 years ago
They have to brainwash us into this fear so the private contractors can (continue to) line their pockets with OUR precious tax dollars. No more CEOs running the land of the "free" from private bunkers. And labels just obscure the truth from our eyes while dividing us up.
antifaith82 2 years ago
Jonah Goldberg has a great book out called "Liberal Fascism" where he makes a very good case for why the liberal left (e.g. Leesa) are the true fascists. Classical liberalism which stands for individual liberty is lost for this public education-schooled generation. Liberals are unable to argue reasonably without resorting to derision, name-calling, and the ignoring of facts.
jcomd 2 years ago
Liz Cheney is agreat American. I love it when she puts these lefties in their place. It's text book, I love it.
rizz917 2 years ago
You poor misguided americans. Take a trip outside your borders, if you can find a map, and see what the real world is like. I pity you.
retox 2 years ago
retox:
Save your pity.
Some of us are trying to better ourselves without the Faux Philosophy of some of the Christians and other Brown Shirts...
The others blindly follow idiots like Junior Bush and his criminal ilk.
leesagrrl 2 years ago
I love this Woman, I want to marry her... She makes more sense than anyone right now making the rounds. Liz is great. You libs, you need to pay attention.
rizz917 2 years ago
rizz917:
Hi Liz... didn't know you had a YouTube account. Nice to see you... but I still think you have all the info wrong... and your reasoning is circuitous crap... and O"Donnell made you look like the foolish ass-sucking apologist that you are... and besides... You're just the offspring of the Devil... that alone doesn't mean anyone should take you seriously.
leesagrrl 2 years ago
I'm always amazed at the level of hatred in the hearts of liberals. Liberals have always tried to spoon feed the rest of us that we should be tolerant abd understanding of other people. So, I have to conclude, Leesa, that you are the true shining example of everything liberals stand for. The real truth is, you are a fascist that resides within a fascist party. It's the left that wear brown shirts, not the right. So, let me suggest, you go get an education and learn what you have become.
rizz917 2 years ago
rizz917:
Besides being a sanctimonious ass... it's pretty funny the way you Faux Christians turn the Bible around to suit your fancy.
The little part that Moses said god said to him about "Thou Shalt Not Kill," doesn't have a little asterix next to it. It doesn't say "Don't Kill Unless Of Course You have this Sadistic Need to Torture Someone."
Let me suggest something... no.. I better not, you'll just feign indignance and moral superiority.
Hypocrite.
leesagrrl 2 years ago
Comment removed
rizz917 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I don't know if I should pitty you or be happy you're so terribly tortured within your inferiorirty complex... Trying so hard to believe you're so much more than you really are. In any case, pay attention little girl, the Bible says, "Thou shalt not murder." So, when you see Islamic terrorists murder innocent Americans, you should know that enhanced interrogations prevented more innocent Americans from being murdered. Maybe they even saved you, who knows. Wait, am I allowed to say terrorists?
rizz917 2 years ago
Hahahaha. Funny, but sickening. You truely are liberal to the core. No point in arguing when your opponent isn't altogether sane. I have to admit that you are extremely effective at spewing your hate propaganda - I'm sure it's truely inspiring to other America-hating leftists.
Mackberserk 2 years ago
rizz917:
I changed my mind. I do have a suggestion for you. Look up "Fascism" and tell me how I'm a fascist?
Next time get to know a word before you use it.
And as for "tolerance." I may be a Progressive but I am defiantly intolerant of intolerance - especially when the Mormon freaks spend Millions to stop Gays from having the same Rights as them - and then claim that their "rights" are being abused.
On the other hand, I believe the judgmental Mormons and I should have the same Rights.
leesagrrl 2 years ago
I'll try this again... Like I said, you are a fascist, you can't help it... all liberals are fascist. Libs try to make anti gay lifestyle expressions illegal hate speech. The left does everything from throwing things at conservatives who speak in Universities to trying to silence talk radio through the fairness doctrine. YES, you are fascists. Ironically, American warriors risk their lives to protect your rights as you try to take away my rights of free speech.
My guess is you're a gay atheist
rizz917 2 years ago
ROFL. Damn, you really know how to serve a liberal. Kudos
Mackberserk 2 years ago
mormon girl has right to marry boy.
mormon boy has right to marry girl.
gay girl has right to marry boy.
gay boy has right to marry girl.
am i missing something?
TheAsilde 2 years ago
Lock these torturing criminals up.
ahermit 2 years ago
We did, they're in Gitmo
kandy1958 2 years ago 7
Cheers
Mackberserk 2 years ago
I'm serious when I say it, Liberalism is definitely a mental disorder. Some kind of self loathing, built in guilt thing. They're feeling guilty for their very being, just for existing. It's a shame! This is why they blame America for the worlds problems. We shouldn't be allowed to live a better life than in other places, they're guilty over that. The US is causing global warming, guilt. Whites alone are racists, solely responsible for slavery, they carry that with them every day. Feeling guilty
rizz917 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Liz Cheney wins every time in these interviews. Where has she been all this time? She needs to run for office. This reporter was bumbling around ineffectively trying to pin her down, but she bested him at every turn.... because she has the truth on her side, and it's clear.
sndblstr 2 years ago
Comment removed
sndblstr 2 years ago
Brainwashed.
sitrucm 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fabulous! Cheney handed Obama his ass today.
beaglenuts55 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Who cares what this bimbo thinks?
mdey1970 2 years ago
So we are supposed to keep gitmo open forever or until the last terrorist dies? That could be expensive and not too conservative IMO. We got prisoners in America that are way worse than any terrorist at gitmo. If we let them loose in some of our prisons, they would be killed.
burntonion05 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Liz Cheney makes me sick. She's like Dick Cheney's pitbull with lipstick - foul, ignorant and unrestrainable.
markthenicholson 2 years ago
Dick Cheney was on spot in that speech! Obama is leaking intel into the national public which includes terrorists. Obama is headed towards chaos & Socialism - that's REAL CHANGE ALRIGHT"! Bush helped us to remain safe since 9/11. He took the war to THEIR homefront.
doyle0h0h7 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
really??
lets see
she thinks that detainees at gitmo go through rehabilitation...was that an intelligent comment?
so she can speak
she is still a lying repuke bitch
both she and daddy can share the same cell at gitmo
waterboard them both
brabon1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
liz,
i know its hard to face the truth...but your daddy is an evil fuck who should be in prison
now stay the fuck off of tv, cuz you dont know shit
brabon1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The only reason we would want to know where Dick is on this issue is so we know where not to be. If Dick says it's so, then we know is isn't so. If he says its right, then we know it's wrong.
charlie44444 2 years ago
- lets see? the place Gitmo is at? NEVER been "escaped" from! and the effect? KEEPS the looney terrorists AWAY from America! So the EVIDENCE is= good place to keep=EVIL! Omama wants to BRING IT HOME? what a shape-shifter the Dims voted in! on the Sham-pain trail~hes one slogan! ~then as Prez? hes another? and he blamed "President Bush" 28 times? (excuse me didn't he say this was 'change" and "a new day?" seems he has gotten=on=the=blame=train!!! And can't figure out how to GET OFF IT! )seessssh
OcultOprah 2 years ago 2
What the hell is that comment supposed to mean?
crazytvfan815 2 years ago
Omama is a GOOB! and a fraud! and has NOTHING to replace Gitmo! No one will even ADMIT in 4 years they=VOTED for this ignorant looney leftie! Omama=bring evil here? a TERRORIST? And Omama FAILEd to="mention" that a TERROR plot was FOILED the day before? He was a =strutin~pea-brain-cock~ during that diatribe against the Bush/Cheny administration! He has NOTHING to OFFER the USA to keep us "safer"! And rambled on and on and BLAMED & BLAMED! others? Omama needs to FOCUS on=ECONOMY! PLEASE! O=loser
OcultOprah 2 years ago 5
Falsehood 1: 14% of released Gitmo prisoners have returned to the battlefield. Correction; 14% have been suspected of or have returned to the battle field. So in fact less than 14% have actually returned to the battlefield.
Falsehood 2: Criticisms come from Europe. Correction: The majority of Americans are also against Gitmo and support closing this facility.
markthenicholson 2 years ago
Right they like creating the strawman of "appeal to europe" as if anything they don't like must be good for us analogy. It wouldn't matter if the entire united states is against something if the international community is also against it then it must be for the best. This is the equivalent of being an isolationist. Pissing off the world and your enemies daily can't possibly be good. Why don't they see this?
PoliticalSkeptic 2 years ago
Liz Cheney did 911
ElectricPineapple79 2 years ago
She jumped out of the plane with a parachute, but no one saw her.
LeoKinoske 2 years ago
Comment removed
markthenicholson 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Dick Cheny asked for 9/11 to happen when he wrote the "Project for a New American Century" ...... ........... .......... But what I want to know is: What is wrong with approaching terrorism from criminal justice standpoint? ...... Being that most of these terrorist don't have a home country, are they not just international criminals? Instead of enemy troops?
DannyLIVEWIRE 2 years ago
the reasoning of the top politicians in the US are as complicated as found in a 15 dollar pc wargame.
ElAlexxis 2 years ago
Conquest, resources, money.....
BootsyJ 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Luckily for Obama, he had known about Cheney's national security speech for more than a week.
That knowledge gave Obama lots of time to prepare his own (overly long) speech.
Too bad no one on his staff used any of that time to proofread Obama's speech to make sure he would get Gates' first name right.
eksdem 2 years ago
Hey machberserk, Bush, Cheney, and their cronies made a fortune off the war in Iraq. Ever here of Halliburton & KBR. The value of Cheneys holdings went up at least 5 fold since 2003. Not to mention the paybacks by defense contractors and other war profiteers. When are you brainless right wingers going to realize that wars are created to enrich the criminals that start them.
lablvr55 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This bitch AND her father should be waterboarded....so they can assess whether or not it is torture.
Hereticbooks 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
If right wingers had working brains they would be left wingers. Instead they have dysfunctional distorted brains which makes them very dangerous!!!! Remember, the most right wing political party of the last century was the NAZI party. And look what they gave the world not to mention the destruction of their own country.
lablvr55 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yes, Lablvr, and bush/cheney have destroyed this country as well. In a more suble way. they have destroyed our credibility, our moral imperative and our diplomacy with other countries. They have created hate and divisiveness in this country and they THRIVE on that. Demons for sure.
zweleyzzz 2 years ago
When it comes to National Defense, particularly against terrorist religious extremists who cannot be reasoned with - it's not about left or right. It shouldn't be politicized at all. That's why Obama has kept Bush's national security programs in place - including enhanced interrogation, wiretaps, the Patriot Act, etc. And that's why not even fellow Democrats will provide funds needed to release the Gitmo prisoners.
haypenny 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hey Machberserk, you are BERSERK!!! Clueless simpleminded children are the ones who vote for and support right wing criminals like the republicans/Bush/Cheney. In 1999 Bush stated he wanted to invade Iraq. January 2001, 1st meeting at white house Bush asked his people " how can we Attack Iraq!!" Hence, the brush off of Clinton's warnings about Al Quida attackes using commercial aircraft. The facts are there idiots, listen to them instead of your lying, deceiving, asshole right wingers.
lablvr55 2 years ago
Comment removed
lghess 2 years ago
BLAH, BLAH, BLAH they r annoying The Cheneys need to shut up and go away they're not in the White House anymore.
HaydeeKajefa 2 years ago
Chuck Todds a douche bag!
Say aye!
CAMARA99 2 years ago
Even if the report is true, 1 of 7 released return to the battlefield, that would mean the majority of people released from Gitmo - 86% would never fight again.
RZetlin 2 years ago 2
Under Bush, 2/3rds of the Guantanamo detainees were released. 2/3rds. Where's the outrage?
MusashiFilms 2 years ago 3
It only takes one with a bomb strapped to his/her chest to inflict devastating casualties.
Mackberserk 2 years ago
Dick Cheney is a LIAR, a criminal and knew about the coming attack on the USA by the terrorists. He and bush planned to get into Iraq before they were elected, then they had a smooth route. LIARS.
lablvr55 2 years ago
HAHAHA. You idiot. So they set up the attacks so that one of the planes would be headed to the White House? Then they started a war because it's fun? I don't see either one of them better off because of Iraq. It's amazing how little logic a child like yourself is capable of using.
Mackberserk 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Berserk, you got lots to learn about corrupt politician criminals like bush and cheney. read some american history books, you'll soon find out.
zweleyzzz 2 years ago
You want to talk about corrupt? I see enough of that in the "Stimulous Package". There's so much wasted money in there you could found a small country. And then there's the companies that are being told how to run their business by the government. THAT, my friend, is corruption. And it's in the wide open. Bush and Cheney what? Had the terrorists attack us? To what end I ask.
Mackberserk 2 years ago 2
Mackberserk:
It wasn't for "fun..." Keep up the disingenuous crap. BushCo and their cronies wanted to start a war with Iraq for years. You never read the PNAC's mission statement?
leesagrrl 2 years ago
Why do so many people jump on all the most unlikely reasons that are hidden away somewhere instead of reading what is going on in front of their face. Iraq was invaded to root out a dictator, who intelligence agencies from three separate countries claimed he had weapons of mass destruction. It was no secret that Sadam hated the U.S. And guess what, Sadam is dead now. THAT is why we went there. Not some pre-planned conspiracy BS. Disingenuous, huh? Your ignorance far outweighs your intelligence.
Mackberserk 2 years ago
Mackberserk:
Speaking of Ignorance... Cognitive Dissonance is a form if Ignorance... and yours is obviously infinite. I made my argument. You're response was non-related... and if your statement is true... then Junior lied and we invaded Iraq illegally.
Read the PNAC's Mission Statement... or is that too much Reality in your Fantasy Junior Land?
You're a delusional macaroon... and a proud Comment Thumb Pumper.
Keep Berzerking On, oh obviously berserk one.
leesagrrl 2 years ago
My response had direct relation to your belief that the PNAC Mission Statement was the driving motivation behind the Iraq war. Perhaps your lack of intelligence is creating a mental block? I suggest you read again.
I find it funny that you are somehow tying the PNAC statement to the original claim that Bush and Cheney supposedly had terrorists attack us on 911. Rediculous, but I suppose that is how liberals think - if there is a pattern. And if he lied, where is your supportive evidence?
Mackberserk 2 years ago
She's actually pretty impressive.
She's wrong, since the place to stop terrorism is at our borders, but she effectively made her case.
jaimondrow 2 years ago
Liz Cheney is a moron just like her dad...........how can anyone take her seriously...
assassin216 2 years ago
You people are so vile. And so very very profoundly, even comically, stupid. Yes, our former vice prez has 'no business commenting on affairs of State' --- but you do. And lets put "terrorist" in quotes, because we all know there's no such thing. While you morons slept in your mom's basements, you were being protected by Bush, Cheney, and our superb military forces from being blown the fuck up. Listening to liberal ignorance is the most horrific torture on earth.
haypenny 2 years ago
Well, considering we've yet to be attacked under Obama's administration and suffered the worst terrorist attack in our country's history under Bush and Cheney, I'm not sure how you can say that with a straight face. Many Americans lost family and friends on Sept. 11th - how is that being protected? Oh, right, it only counts *after* the attack....yeeeeah, okay. Who's the moron?
MusashiFilms 2 years ago
So that means that the last 7 - 8 years we were protected by....who? Obama? Pelosi? Who was it - let me in on the secret. It wasn't the previous Admin that was shaking hands with Tyrants and Communist dictators. Or crying about the rights of known terrorists without valuing the rights of Americans. I'm aware of the lost lives on 9-11,my sister-in-law being one of so many innocent people. But, I'm sure it's the Terrorists who need our sympathy.
haypenny 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It's a nice tactic to argue that the period of time *after* that fateful attack is all that matters. Wait, I don't mean 'nice,' I mean 'convenient.' At the end of the day, on the record of successful terrorist attacks on American soil, there's no spinning the Obama=0, Bush=1. Sleep well.
MusashiFilms 2 years ago
I never made that argument . So - it's FDR's fault that Pearl Harbor was attacked too. It's all nicely settled then. Everything's so cut n' dry. It's always the fault of America, Americans, Democracy, Capitalism, maybe Christianity and of course Republicans. It's all clear to me now.
haypenny 2 years ago
I never blamed any of those. Sounds like you have some issues you might need to work out.
MusashiFilms 2 years ago
MusashiFilms:
Why don't you count 9/11? Or the Anthrax terrorist attack that Junior didn't prevent after 9/11?
Bush: minus 2
leesagrrl 2 years ago
So you're saying because the Bush administration got blindsided by a terrorist attack, and Obama has not, we should feel safer with Obama? I have your answer - You're the moron. How do you imagine an attack can be prevented when nobody is expecting it? The policies put into place after 911 were for the purpose of protecting the American people. Obama sure is effective at tearing them down. Idiot.
Mackberserk 2 years ago
No, I was replying to someone else's point of pride about how safe Bush/Cheney kept us, as if the lack of an attack post 9/11 was any more evidence than the fact that an attack happened on their watch. Maybe instead of just calling people moron and idiot on the internet, you read a bit more before first.
MusashiFilms 2 years ago
Yea... I know who you were replying to. Your rediculous point was that we got attacked on 911, and bush/cheney (who were in office at the time) were not able to prevent it... That would have happened to any president - most definitely including Obama, who does not seem to like anti-terror policies.
The real question is: Why are you focusing on an unforeseeable tragedy that nobody could have altered AND ignoring the preventive measures that have been implemented as a result of its occurrence?
Mackberserk 2 years ago
Bush was not blind sided by 911, he was informed of an upcoming terrorist attack by a CIA briefer on August 6 2001 in Crawford, He was shown the memo "Bin Ladin Determined to Strike in US." After hearing the full briefing he told the CIA briefer "All right. You've covered your ass, now."
There were 2 major terror attacks on the Mainland under Bush' watch yet no one has been prosecuted, in fact one attack was not even investigated
xdir 2 years ago
The CIA was getting several weekly terrorist threats around that time, and all the way up to 911. Even had he known to act on that particular threat, how could we have prepared for an attack of such proportions without knowing what to expect? With our knowledge back then, I doubt anything except for law enforcement would have been hightened - as with all the pre-991 terror attacks.
Mackberserk 2 years ago
Mackberserk:
Bullcrap. BushCo failed us. Bush was too busy clearing brush to protect anyone.
leesagrrl 2 years ago
And what do you think of all the anti-terror policies that have been put into place as a result of 911? Do you believe they are unnecessary? Bush certainly did alot of things after the attack - if there isn't one you agree with, then you're a hypocritical bush-hating idiot. Even I agree with at least some of what Obama has done so far.
Mackberserk 2 years ago
Mackberserk:
Dear Thumb Puncher:
He didn't do enough... remember the Anthrax attack he failed to keep us safe from right after 9/11?
I know Junior didn't put any extra effort into securing the Ports or Borders... etc....
As for hating Junior... I do... vehemently. He took my Country back to the Dark Ages in a million ways.
leesagrrl 2 years ago
So bitch about everything you think he did wrong and ignore the two countries he's liberated, the fact that he crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, and put nuclear inspectors in Libya, Iran, and North Korea. He also captured a dictator who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people.. Sounds like a decent president to me, if not good. But of course you don't care about those facts... They're too positive for your liking. Dark Ages? You haven't seen anything. It's socialism time; Obama's time!
Mackberserk 2 years ago
If the CIA is getting weekly threats and are no doubt telling the Bush administration of such a threat, yet NO action was taken. There was no national security sit down, no leadership from the whitehouse to bring together the various security organizations.
When the planes hit the towers Cheney & Rumsfeld actually thought it was Saddam!!!.
xdir 2 years ago
Weekly threats from several anonymous terror organizations - at least back then (i have no idea now). The CIA's job was to sift through them all and try to identify a real threat. The fact that Bush took no action that particular threat should not surprise anyone in post-911 circumstances. Hindsight is 20/20, and DHS didn't exist then..
Mackberserk 2 years ago
So let its ok in your book for the CIA to notify the President of an upcoming attack and the PotUS to ignore it? even when the threat points to a group that has already committed suicide attacks against the USS Cole? a group the previous administration said was the worst security threat to the nation!!.
Yet GW Bush in May 2001 was speaking of a missile defence shield as essential to national, is shows the He did not pay ANY attention to the CIA but blindly pushing his own agenda.
xdir 2 years ago
I stand next to my previous response. His 'agenda' sure did change, didn't it.
Mackberserk 2 years ago
It should not take the lives of 3000 citizens to change a presidents agenda.
xdir 2 years ago
xdir:
Awesome retort! Thanx!
I notice the apologist moron hasn't replied o that yet.
leesagrrl 2 years ago
You're right, Xdir... Problem is, nobody told that to Clinton after we were attacked by Al Qaeda all through the ninties which ended in 9/11. Maybe you forgot that Clinton could have killed Bin Laden with an UAV but chose not to because he didn't want to upset the Islamic community. Perhaps YOU should have told Clinton to stop treating Al Qaeda as a criminal network and instead declare war on them with the full might of the US military... you know, the way Bush did. You people make me sick!
rizz917 2 years ago
What are you on about? Clinton had every attack on the US investigated and the perpetrators prosecuted, Al Qaida only committed 1 attack in the Clinton administration (USS Cole), the rest where groups now affiliated but then freelancing with AlQaida.
Al Qaida is a criminal entity, Bush incorrectly raised their status to an army by declaring "war on terror", the Clinton method would have been to send in the Army, kill those who resist and the FBI arrest those who surrender.
xdir 2 years ago
This is fascinating to me. To freelance is not the same as affiliation? Wow, talk about denial... but you're wrong anyway, Al Qaeda has been directly responsible for the bombings of our Embassies in Africa, murdered servicemen in Egypt, the USS Cole, and the 1st WTC bombing. Ramzi Yousef trained in Alqaeda training camps in the late 80's, planned for the 1st bombing in 91, did it in 93. His uncle, Khalid Shaikh mohammed funded him. BTW, KSM is the architect of 9/11. It was all Al Qaeda.
rizz917 2 years ago
As for Al Qaeda being a criminal entity... no, it's not, it's a terrorist group that has declarwed war on the United States. They declared war on us in the 90's, we treated it like a criminal investigation, more Americans died because of that. Bush was exacty right by declaring war on those who attacked us, and have been attacking us. It's a war, ya understand? WAR! We are at war with people who want to end our way of life, and the left gives them sypathy and understanding, blaming us! It's sick
rizz917 2 years ago
Al Qaida is a criminal entity that has committed mass murder, you dont declare war on criminals.
If war is to be declared on terror then why not also bomb the Neo Nazi's that Timothy McVeigh was linked to? why not get the CIA to locate & terminate the Anthrax attacker?
The diff between right & left is the right is easily scared and over reacts.
xdir 2 years ago
The right over reacts? Easilly scared? Actually, the left is soft on national defense, it holds a belief that if you just try to be nice to our enemies, they will somehow come to like us and go away. Sorry, not in the real world. According to you, treating these people like criminals instead of terrorists achieved what exactly? We treated terrorists like criminals in the 90's and we suffered one attack after another... by doing it your way. It didnt work, did it? Wht can't you just admit it?
rizz917 2 years ago
Clinton did exactly what you're saying we should be doing and we continued to be attacked. Bush declared war on them and we weren't attacked anymore. Tell me, who got it right? Liberalism is a mental disorder, I'm totally convinced. Even when the evidence is as plain as the nose on your face, you refuse to either see it, or admit it. It's a shame.
rizz917 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Clinton prosecuted and successfully convicted them, he even told the Bush Admin that Alqaida was the gravest threat, a warning GW ignored repeatedly costing 3000 live.
GW Bush declared war; spent at least $4 Trillion (1 Afghanistan war, 2 Iraq war & 1 boosting homeland security) and achieved what? 4000 dead soldiers, 35000 wounded & the terrorists are still active.
"we weren't attacked anymore" After the "war on terror" the US was attacked thousands of times!!, just ask the troops in Iraq.
xdir 2 years ago
I don't know... could be you're just trying to get under my skin. Could be you're really a colossal jewel of glittering ignorance. In any case, you clearly are incapable of accepting historical fact. You are a typical liberal. It could not be Clintons fault the towers came down, it's Bush's fault. Tell us, what did Bush know that he ignored which would have stopped 9/11 from happening? After all, he was in office a whole 7 months, 11 days before 9/11. In court I might add... enlighten us.
rizz917 2 years ago
I suggest you use the "find" feature in your browser to search my comments for this video I have already had a debate with Mackberserk on what Bush knew and when.
xdir 2 years ago
No search for me, thanks... You can find it and post it yourself. But the truth is, I already know the answer. Liberalism is a catastrophic failure at every level, from the economy to our national defense, it fails everywhere and every time it's tried.
rizz917 2 years ago 2
Are you for real? the past 8 years has showed conservatism fail on every aspect of governance, remember 4 of those years had the GOP control the House & Senate.
Failure to prosecute the perpetrators of 2 terror attacks, Katrina, Iraq debacle (4200 dead soldiers & 35000 wounded and Iran is the real winner!!), Economic crisis, the list is endless.
xdir 2 years ago
Maybe it's just that you're uninformed. Getting all your news from CNN and PMSNBC is doing you no favors. Now, you bring up Katrina, who is running that state? Who is responsible for the public safety? The Mayor! The Governor can declare a state emergency, but she didn't, and she didn't because she didn't want Bush to get the credit, that's what she said. So Chocolate city Nagan, and the liberal Governor aren't responsible for that debacle, Bush is? That's their job, not Bush's. That's a fact!
rizz917 2 years ago
Declare a state of emergency? with what resources (40% of the National Guard were deployed overseas), They relied on FEMA.
xdir 2 years ago
Again, it's all dribble from you idiots. Where'd your proof? Where's your evidence to back up these stupid claims you're making? I mean, the idea that the Governor cannot enact a state of emergency when the lev's break because there are no guardsman is ludacris, man! Even if it was true that 40% were over sea's, she still could have used 60% of the force. This is the stupidest thing I ever heard. And you're facts are wrong anyway.
rizz917 2 years ago
2 terror attacks? No, only 1. You can't even be honest about that! Al Qaeda is busted up in Iraq and Afghanistan, Taliban are on the run, their finances are terribly disrupted. Many of the heads of Al Qaeda are either in jail or dead, Iraqi's are voting again after 30 years of tyranny and pose no more threat to the US directly, or indirectly. Now, you still haven't answered my question about what Bush knew that could have prevented 9/11. I anxiously await you answer.
rizz917 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
No, 2 Attacks, remember the Anthrax attack that killed 5 people and put the country on high alert?
Taliban on the run? get your facts straight - they control most of southern Afghanistan.
Iraq is passive because Iran wants it that way (not due to US troops), Iran now controls more then half of the worlds oil.
I have told you read my posts by searching for XDIR in the comments for this video , I will not repeat myself - you entered the debate read it all.
xdir 2 years ago
No, Jr. Only i attacks... Al qaeda managed only 1 attack on American soil after Bush became President. And they tried real hard to attack us after 9/11, but the Patriot act stopped them cold. The guy sending letters was a domestic nutjob. Actually, I prefer to call him a criminal entity, not a terrorist. But reading your posts, I'd have to say you're a dailcos'r, or you spen time on the huffington post. Some left wing kook propaganda blog. You're terribly uninformed... seriously, it's bad.
rizz917 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I said Terrorist not AlQaida, by your logic there was only 1 terrorist attack under the Clinton Admin, Clinton did not implement the tyranny of the Patriot act and he apparently "stopped them cold" He even arrested all those involved and had them incarcerated on US soil without a single breakout.
xdir 2 years ago
I don't even know what to say, it's pointless... the left are idiots, that's true, but you kinda bring it to a whole new level. It's almost as if you live in a parallel universe. You make one accusation after another but offer no factual basis for any them. I just watched Osama tell the world he brought the towers down, you idiots say he had nothing to do with that. It's a sickness, liberalism is a mental disorder. The blame America first crowd, America is the reason for all evil in the world.
rizz917 2 years ago 2
One more thing, Taliban are on the run. It's true, they're gaining strength in some area's of the country but it's not the entire south, or even most of it. But they are losing, bad in many area's. And isn't it amazing how you lefties give Iran credit for the lack of violence in Iraq. Lol! The surge had nothing to do with it, it's really Iran. Well, keep telling yourself that, fantasy boy. If it makes you feel better, that's OK. Us true Americans know the truth and that's what matters.
rizz917 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I suggest you read up on the real situation in Afghanistan, the Taliban are terrorizing inside Kabul, Karzai controls no more then the presidential palace.
xdir 2 years ago
The economy... we have enjoyed the greatest peace time economic growth in global history over the last 7 years. Maybe you forgot that, doubt it. Fanny and Freddie is what caused this economy to dive because of liberal interference. Barny Frank and Chris Dodd should be in prison for their roles in it. Too bad if that bothers you. Tax cuts caused the treasury to take in record tax revenue, never seen anything like.The economy grew every 1/4 and unemployment averaged 4.5%. Liberals are so stupid!
rizz917 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Because it was a BUBBLE!!, there was no real growth, no substance behind the boom, it was all on paper.
Fanny & Freddie did not cause the economy to dive, they augmented it, unlike AIG holding $1 Trillion liabilities on subprime or an out of control CDS market of $50 trillion (thanks to Phil Gramm's deregulation) that were direct causes
xdir 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
In the 90's Alqaida did maybe 1 attack per year, after the declaration of "the War on terror" (post 911) AlQaida performed 1000's of attacks a year.
Its clear the "war" has not worked, Al Qaida still exists, its leadership is still alive & plotting.
xdir 2 years ago
Yep! That's half true, Clinton's policies enabled Al Qaeda to attack America roughly once per year. We've had the WTC, Embassies, USS COLE... and a few more attacks during the 90's. So, tell me, what attacks took place in the US since Bush declared war on terrorists? You mean on the battlefield? That's just so lame. Oh, sorry, I thought Al Qaeda was just a criminal entity. How do criminal entities become global threats?
You lefties are really bigger threats to freedom than any terrorist.
rizz917 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Only one attack had taken place on US soil prior to 911 (WTC1) and that was 8 years before GW took office, so the frequency of attacks was rare. The attacks on US forces in the name of AlQaida are almost always by people who did not consider America an enemy until the invasion of Iraq, the "war on terror" has increased the ranks of AlQaida.
AlQaida was considered a criminal entity even in the Arab world until Bush made them "righteous" by calling the "war on terror" a crusade.
xdir 2 years ago
Al Qaida is a terrorist group - end of story. There is a distinct difference between a criminal and a terrorist. Criminals commit crimes usually for the purpose of a personal gain - a rational (if extreme) motive that a detective might understand and be able to use for investigative purposes.
A (muslim) terrorist needs no reasonable motive but Allah's will. They just hate America - probably more than many leftists. Clinton was clearly wrong in his decisions regarding terrorism.
Mackberserk 2 years ago
KSM did not join Al Qaida until just before the 911 attacks, he was freelance America hater. Ramzi Yousef trained in Al Qaida camps but was not a member of Al Qaida.
xdir 2 years ago
That was to be my retort! Thank you.
Mackberserk 2 years ago
get that cunt off television!
likes2p 2 years ago
Did Liz Cheney submit a list of questions and Todd just read them off? He's a terrible reporter.
PeterOrszagCallMe 2 years ago
what a suckass chuck todd is to GOPsters and their offspring -- he's no journalist -- he's a propaganda putz!
bbbbmer 2 years ago
Comment removed
PeterOrszagCallMe 2 years ago
Dick Cheney has no business commenting on affairs of state. He will only regain that right after his next "terrorist" attack makes him the de-facto ruler of the US. Hint: nuclear devices have gone missing in transit, under direct supervision of Dicksmack the Terrible.
newmanfrigan 2 years ago
The spawn of the Dark Lord speaks!
integral 2 years ago
Why is the so-called 'liberal media' giving Dickless and his daughter so much airtime? This is bullshit.
newmanfrigan 2 years ago