Added: 2 years ago
From: Th3Generat0r
Views: 241,863
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,146)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • look up P.Marmet and C.Couture phy.dept.university of ottawa newtonphysics.on.ca/eclipse/ this is just one study that disproves old albert einstein .

  • I would need to see this machine run indefinitely (or at least for a few hours straight) before I buy into it..... It sure looks to me that its just very low friction combined with you spinning the heck out of it, combined with a small motor helping it along to what will be an eventual STOP.

  • @TheArmorFist I wouldn't buy into it myself but it's all solid sci.and i can't believe no one has stolen it

  • @Th3Generat0r why are you mixing all the comments and reply's up youtube people it does not work

  • if you trust your self to have built this, why not invite 20 Witnesses and septics, and run this for a few hours. at the end of the day you'd have everything you need and more

  • @superdiza O.k.if there's 20 people that want to see this what the hell but the 1st powered flight only lasted 18 sec. but the difference in falling and flying is amazing but the only reason I have anything on youtube is for patent protection.

  • @Th3Generat0r Then, like so many others, you are going toward this the wrong way.. Patents will not protect you or facilitate anything in regards to making it, yet providing a valid and uncontested device will.. money, power and fame does not stem from "patents", it stems from technology.

  • @superdiza The last thing I am after is money power or fame I have provided a valid and uncontested device.A patent is what it is and nothing more.I have done my part ,to think I could develop this is unrealistic

  • @superdiza you know the more I think about it the more I wonder if I do trust myself?You really ask a good question.

  • @Th3Generat0r thanks.

    IMO this is the algorithm:

    make an uncontested device (have u?),

    run it in front of witnesses, live on the web for a few days, and publish your measured results.(sustained power output)

    when successfully reproduced once or twice round the world, we shall have free energy..!

    and humanity will be saved :)

    hope I can help

  • @Th3Generat0r - do you just make up crap to get noticed. Here are the facts:

    1. Sound doesn't travel in a vacuum nor in space

    2. The speed of light measured in a vacuum is 299,792,458 metres per second

    3. C^2 is a conversion factor

    Stick with whittling...

    Can you get someone to check your spelling and grammar so people can read it in the first few attempts?

  • @Th3Generat0r A generator does'nt change Mech.energy but trasforms Kinetic energy (energy of motion)into current.

  • I like so many others I don't believe vertual photons or electrons and all the dumb things there said to do .Time is nothing but a thought.No one kno0ws what mag. really is.

  • @Th3Generat0r we can't creat a true vacuum here on earth there is all ways residual gas,it's much less gas pressure than atmospheric pressure but not perfect.there are 50 billon nuetrenos for every electron there everywhere and pass through all matter therefor the speed of photons has never been mesured in a vacuum.thay are the ether and thats why radio waves can travel through space is i .what meant.in the best man made "vacuum"sound waves are possible.

  • i'm sure everyone knows that recently neutrinos have been proven to go faster than photons if true Albert was not only wrong but clueless

  • @truthseeker675 Let me see the video it must be amazing!Can I put your 50 vids on my channel?

  • What about the energy you are using to spin that thing around with your arms?

  • @dythaka I had to start it somhow

  • I can do better in 25 years

  • @dythaka well I sure wish you the best of luck but I'll bet you never have or ever will do anything with your life and you will remember what I'm telling you 25yrs from now when you are remembering your unevetfull life and wondering how it all got so boring {MARK MY WORDS }

  • @truthseeker675 Everthing I've ever said is on public record here on YouTube. Show me 1 time I ever told anyone to recreate this or try to sell them plans or try to get money from them. Why can't you put your videos on NOW? RIGHT NOW? Because if they speed up under load you had a great success and have proved me right. I will put you on my channel page. Let me know where I can see these videos. If I ever do make any money I will pay you for your contribution. Please let me see these videos.

  • @Th3Generat0r Do you really think that you can make all these complex psycological diagnosises only using information from this comments page? I'm under psyciactric care at the present time and have been for over 30 yrs. The reason is because of my abnormally high IQ and genius in so many fields I can barely function. To think that being afreak of nature with no successes in life no friends and no possibility of any normal human contact is something to brag about shows no understanding of genius

  • Dont Let the Neocons or the feds see that... they would confiscate it and make you disappear.

  • @irontusk341 Thanks for the warning.

  • If this is true, you are already selling power to the power grid I guess?  First thing I would do at least :)

  • @LapsusBrutus1 Happy New Year Dude! Hope you had a Merry Christmas! Of course it is for real its the Real Deal! And the first generator on youtube to use the term "Real Deal" now there are lots who stole my idea! All there is on youtube is crooks, cons, and muons, nuetrons, protons, figNewton's, and morons! You know man I never thought about selling it to the grid. I have done my part on this invention a long time ago and it needs someone like Liam Xaoh.

  • @Th3Generat0r agree that that's about all there is these days!

    Sooner or later though I want to get in touch with ya about building one of these that would be able to power my Hot tub!

  • @stormshockin JUST contact me when it finally goes into production and I'll totally give you one !

  • @Th3Generat0r You are in egomaniacal failure. the build itself is not bad. but you exemplified your unmitigated ignorance with your fallacious accusations of Einstein being wrong when you know your device is a failure be a man and except it and get back to the drawing board. NO instead you insist on maliciously deceiving everybody it must really suck to be one of those scumbags that makes fake videos how is your ego feeling now you imbecilic vacuous self absorbed liar

  • @truthseeker675 where are the vids.

  • Here is the problem. Lets pretend for a moment your invention worked as you claim it does. It still wouldn't be free energy. Free Energy is defined as energy that you can create. You yourself said the machine doesn't create energy it just displaces it. So not only your machine wrong, your title is too.

    Secondly, stop with the physics nonsense. Start thinking about things in terms of quantum mechanics and see why exactly your project was doomed from the start.

  • @TheTjj226 Helmholtz was the first to use the term to make the math come out in chem.reactions where heat is produced but no chem. burned there has to be a form of energy being burned so there has to be a form we don't understand so he called it free energy untill we do.same thing asPauli's neutrino postulate 1931 proved 1956 also proving the ether to be real.

  • @TheTjj226 Physics nonsense?It's quantum mech.that's junk.

  • I love the part when you say free of gravity. If anything you owned were free of gravity they would be in space, and even then it would not be a perfect gravity free environment. You are always being held back by gravity, but the magnets produce a force that is greater than that of gravity. You are still being limited by it and it is still causing drag. No matter how you look at it, the build is so wrong it isn't even funny.

  • @TheTjj226 i don't say its free of gravity thats the great part .it has no weight bearing bearing but still has all its weight.i have had 200 pounds on this machine with the same motor and it turns just as fast.

  • @LiamXaoh Energy can only only be converted from one form to another. Burning wood is converted to heat, the wood is then gone. Magnet goes by coil but, the magnet is still present. Electricity then flows from the coil and is used to do work but the coil is unchanged. Do you not see the problem here? Can you explain how this works?

  • Thank you 4 your video...Allot of people take for granite that along with the criticism and hard work to do allot of this stuff on top of a century of killing off people who want to make the world a better place people still some how lose there humanity. The "M"EGO's just are to arrogant to listen or see the important parts in all steps. Just cause we are doing and learning amazing stuff STILL DOESN'T make us filled with WISDOM.Johnathon Living Seagull Wisdom is rare! This stuff is fun though

  • @reduckulez Ya! there has to be somone that is the smartest person in the world,but that person wouldn't Know anything really ;) king of the worms. But in the land of the blind the one eyed man is king

  • @MathDoobler firsat thing we do is drop caps.. is what we do..

  • I never said extract energy, I said create energy. Second off I was being sarcastic.

    To prove your worth, why don't you take your machine. Go out into a forest (some place you could prove there aren't outlets) and give it one push to set it in motion. I would want some way of measuring acceleration of the invention to see if there is a constant speed it can obtain AND I would want to see a stable output of energy. If your machine can create energy in such a fashion I will apologize

  • @TheTjj226 I wouldn't believe any vidio on youtube anything could be faked.

  • there are three things that dont fit into this, as i see it:

    1. how can you say its producing enough energy to run itself, if you had to spin it round by hand multiple times to start it and to prevent it from getting slower again

    2. how can you say, there is no friction, as its not in a vacuum and its hooked to the motor and some device which holds it in place (the magnets wont do that will they9

    3.What sense does it make, if it will only produce enough energy to run itself

  • Comment removed

  • I would be far more impressed if you had some way of measuring the speed of your invention. Also, what you have invented if anything at all is a perpetual motor, NOT free energy.

    Free energy is the complete creation of energy. You would have been better off using super fluid helium in a super flow with a small turbine at the top of the spout to make free energy. All of this proves nothing though. If it worked, the CIA would have seized the video and you would have disappeared into the dark.

  • @TheTjj226 I have disappeared into the dark.

  • this is a joke, if it was producing free energy it would spin the disk faster and faster until there was a mechanical breakdown... booooo

  • @ajker that's just what it did boob

  • 1. Einstein is correct, E=MC^2, where C represents the speed of light. Read a few books on special and general relativity and while you're at it time dilation and string theory are related topics you might find interesting. Hell, they teach this stuff in high school now.

    2. You fail to specify whether or not that's a natural magnet or an electromagnet holding up the wheel. If its natural it won't last long, the life of a natural magnet shortens relative to the energy you take from it...

  • 2c. If it's an electromagnet (which i would assume is powered by the energy generated) then the only thing you are doing is passing electricity through a circuit and losing some with each pass due to the inefficiencies of energy transfers, mainly friction.

    3. whether or not the magnet is spinning it's still getting just as close to the coil as a fixed magnet and therefore experiencing the same load.

  • I'm sorry but if you've spent 25 years on this then you've wasted 25 years. I'm 19 and I'm finding all sorts of flaws with this. I could go on and on making these points but I think I've made a solid case.

    PS - Finish you're sentences

  • @JSnyder49428 no you really have not

  • i'd like to see the evidence that its producing more energy than it is using, maybe a lightbulb or something. although there is no physical friction in your design, there is still friction from the air (atoms etc), the rpm for your design does degrade, especially as it is wasting energy wobbling as its going round as well as the aforementioned air friction. oh and this isnt an original invention, ive seen a smaller scale of this (running for several weeks before it stopped)

  • trust me guy u did a whole shitload of work for nothin

  • @misterdomination256 Of course I trust you, anyone who would take the time to truly study everything I have said on my comments page and explain why I am wrong in such an eliquent and scientific way, if I would have only known all this time that all I had was a container of feces I could have saved myself from a lot of embarressment a long time ago. Thanks man. P. S. Are you a poet or something?

  • @Th3Generat0r P.S its nothing to be embarrassed about

  • @kokopelli314 it's not his free inergy i'm talking abought but i can see why you think that.And i'm shure you know it deals with chem.No if there is one person to think for bringing together all are laws it's him and it's becouse of of him you are so possitive this can't work and it totaly couldn't if it went afowl of sci. but it does not .

  • People thinking they've made a perpetual motion machine are generally confused people that have no real grasp on physics, so in their view, it's basically magic.

  • @KanedaSyndrome i think YOu dont understand things betond the limitaated supressive information you have been proded into .

  • @frank0067 I understand more than most. In fact, most of the knowledge I have on physics comes from my own deductions, and they correlate with most of the known and accepted physics theories. By the way you spell, I suggest you take a look in the mirror though :)

  • @frank0067 You're right on.These people with limited information they think and speak about things they don't know about.Obviously if you haven't taken the time to read anything other than what you have been spoon fed then you can't comment because you simply have nothing to say.I hope this silly little person will take the time to read all of my comments here.But I really think and they don't.

  • @Th3Generat0r i am impressed and i have learnt something when i first watched this..

    as a generator i think this would out perform anything else yet .. i r realise you have lot more things to do to make this a completed project.. but its very exciting as this stage we are seeing here

  • @frank0067 thank you but it really isn't impressive unless 100,000 goof ups are .But it does work look up Farrday's peradox i think thats where spinning mag. stoped being looked into but it has since been shown that the mag.field turns with the mag. but no one really picked up on it.thanks wendell

  • @frank0067 - judging by your brilliant gasp of English I'd say you'd believe in anything that promised something for nothing. Explain how a "free energy" device works. I'll give you 10 years to give me an answer.

  • @zzytrewq

    Ignorance is the greast religion of the masses.. it asks nothing, it demands nothing its risks nothing

    its the seemingly safest most comforatble gound one can stand !

    The standard of ignorance is as a dull bull weed..which they flask those others with who venture away .

  • @frank0067 "Ignorance is the greast religion of the masses" - so on that basis I take it you're a preacher?

    So explain how a free energy device works, or perhaps how the device in the video is a "free energy generator".

    You can sit there all day saying sceptics are ignorant but unless you can provide answers you are worse than ignorant.

  • @frank0067 Absolutely brilliant and heartwarming! You really give me hope that there is someone who is guarding the gates of our hard fought advancements against the darkness that seems to be rapidly spreading once more. The masses have all been taught to read yet, dictionaries are are seldom used except in the most simplistic fashion. KanedaSyndrome has no idea why you made your first comment or that his lack of decorum was all you needed to figure out his entire game. Again thank you kind sir.

  • Silly silly person lol..

  • nice...

  • brilliant...don't let fbi cia in your door though. u know those fuckers will be on your ass

  • @willywillyization really? If they really cared, don't you think they have internet? wouldn't they already be after him if they gave a shit?

  • Measure the RPM over time then I'll be convinced.

  • @chrisgotmilk Why believe me? :() THERE is nothing on youtube in the free energy arena but, crooks, cons, and come ons talkin nuetrons, protons, and fig NEWTON's to morons.Who are all these people and who are you?This is a sincere question, what would it take?A man's word means nothing in your advanced civilization.If there was any wilderness not yet being destroyed I wouldn't be talking to the murderous mob. I've solved your energy problems but no one will listen. Check out my other videos.

  • of life and events.

  • so according to you a stationary atom has the same amount of energy as a moving atom and sub atomic decay doesnt exsist?

  • @CommanderMethos Give me a break.

  • well i must say all the talk below of ignorance and the word (impossible) being thrown around at liberty seems ignorant to me. I understand the laws of thermodynamics and by this model we are led to believe that a PPM is under those guidelines impossible but in my opinion the use of the word impossible is quite ignorant in itself. Science and the world of physics is something that we DO NOT fully understand and are on the brink of having that model that we have constructed come crashing down.

  • @OfficialMafiaTube so if that model does come crashing down and a new model comes to light whos to say that its impossible? we see the sun every day and the fusion reactions that have powered it for billions of years are so far impossible for us to re create, but obviously they are not impossible for something else to create. and if there was a PPM in creation i highly doubt we would find it surfing youtube...

  • @OfficialMafiaTube I really respect your response.But are you so jaded as to not see that this wounderful miraculous creation called YouTube could very well be well all advanced thinking should be posted?This is no more or no less another advancement in mans' communication.It's not YouTube's fault but all of ours.This is NOT a perpetual motion machine!

  • @Th3Generat0r btw, in any case, according to you physics really is doomed, and even if i made physics a religion (which i don't) it would be an infinitely better religion than all of the others combined. how's that? i also have found absolutely no conclusive evidence that the speed of light is not a constant (in the vacuum of space)

  • @FutebolFanatico001 To what extent are you influenced by Christianity? "As a child I received instruction in both the Torah and the Talmud. I am a jew, but I am enthralled by teh luminous figure of the Nazarene.

    "You accept the historical existence of Jesus?" Unquestionably! No one can read the Gospels without feeling the actual presence of Jesus. His personality pulsates in every word. No myth is filled with such life." - From the biography 'EINSTEIN: His Life and Universe' by Walter Isaacson

  • @Th3Generat0r Throughout his life, he was consistent in deflecting the charge that he was an atheist. "There are people who say there is no God," he told a friend. "But what make me really angry is that they quote me for support of such views." - From the biography 'EINSTEIN: His Life and Universe' by Walter Isaacson

  • @Th3Generat0r once again, i fail to see your point, really. as i already told u, the mathematical relationship is not E=M. because if it were then c would not be included in the equation. It seems you "einstein" do not know your math. and i can't understand what it is you mean. on the topic of religion, once again i do not support conventional religion, and this argument calls for no such thing. physics and religion have nothing in common and anyone wnting to prove physics with religion is crzy

  • @Th3Generat0r not to mention, religious views are personal, including those of einstein himself. further, read tesla's research. the speed of light IS a constant, but not a limit as einstein first proposed. as far as we know, not enough research has been conducted in this area (unfortunately) as for c not being constant, i have heard the theory, but again, no conclusive evidence thus far. maybe in the future we will know more but for now, much is still a mystery

  • @Th3Generat0r here's a quote 4 ya: i know of only two things that are infinite, the universe and human stupidity. And the universe i'm not too sure about. - Albert Einstein. tru story.

  • @Th3Generat0r thers only one thing i know thats infinite 'TIME' LOL

  • @Phoenix080805 Wrong! Time is something that man invented as a measurement... This guy may be onto soemthing here... but I'm not sure if the REM's would have to be half magnetized or sompletely magnetized as they are here... I would REALLY like to see this thing run with a Full group of Coils all of the way around and a Load on that to see if this Really makes the Differnce. As it stands right now, it seems that the sheer momentum of this things carousel is what's dampening the load...

  • @crazy77iii to measure what?im not trying to to be ignorant just asking.no offence

  • @Phoenix080805 Time is used to keep track of say how many rotations my gizmo makes before a candle burns 9(.Life and events.)But its not a real thing at all, there really is just now no wate we missed it .It is one of those things like why go into space when we are already there? I don't need to try to be ignoant and just askiing is the least offence there is.

  • this type of free energy can

    power mass nationwide transit

    energy charge for your cars ie

    charging stations

    n power all your shit heat your water

    but why not use it to colonize the moon and mars

    and raise the roof on their debt ceiling

    wooooh!

  • Respond to this video... I think it is a great idea. Don't patent it. That just alerts the power mongers. Just make 'em, sell 'em and teach others to do the same (under contract to you so you get a royalty from each one sold). Go green grass-roots. You'll be so busy making electricity and money and new friends you won't have time to fight a patent lawsuit. Just duplicate yourself - teach others to make it - and rock-n-roll! You'll get so high on all that juice ...! God Bless Ya!

  • @Th3Generat0r This is Cam Sevy. I don't know who wrote that rude comment about not wanting to live in reality. It certainly WAS NOT ME!! I am personally interested in what you have created. I think using the floating spinning magnets is a dynamic idea! I'd say forget about patenting it, just go into manufacturing. Make and sell, grass roots. You'll have so much business you'll never be broke and once a couple hundred are proving it works and you've trained others, rock and roll & generate juice

  • @Th3Generat0r - you are sounding more confused with each post. I questioned your statement "...e=mc2 proves there is energy in the coils...". Your device has nothing to do with e=mc2 so why imply there is? It is not a nuclear device. In your video you stated you don't agree with the c2 factor and yet you try to use it in an argument. Make up your mind. As for the photons and neutrino references - stick to subject - which is a magnetic device that doesn't work.

  • @zzytrewq Look I'm trying to just explaine somthing I'm serious about.I really don't know what you're doing. magnetic fields induce current in coils.Not the other way around.You didn't understand the question.Energy cannot be created or destroyed only changed from one form to the other.If the magnet is not changed and the copper coil is not changed and yet you've heating a house can't you see there's a problem here?Because none of the mechanical energy was really transfered to the coil at all.

  • @Th3Generat0r - my comment was correct. Coils produce magnetic fields - how do you think electric motors work? Your statement about heating a house I assume is the whiskey taking effect.

  • AND...ITS RUNNING MY WASHING MACHINE

    WOOOO!

  • @qwalznarg WOOOO! Boy we're sure having fun now! Thanks for dropping by! Y'all come back now y'hear?

  • AND...ITS RUNNING MY WASHING MACHINE

    WOOOO!

  • @qwalznarg WOOOO! Sure glad I get to do this again!

  • For you tards out there, he spins the thing using a human hand. Sure I can get a top or coin to spin too.

  • @jimmybilbo I really can't believe you saw me spin it with my hand I thought I hid it so well

  • Comment removed

  • The point of patenting is that if you intend to give this to people , it has to be patented so no one else claims the patent and charges for it . You as a non patent holder of just a working device , places you in a vulnerable position . This means an electric company or any person willing to apply for this is the sole owner of all the rights to this device . You will have a very hard time in court trying to prove otherwise !

  • @BRYCYNS Not if you have a genuine portfolio to show to court.

  • @AClarke2007 I have everything documented, dated and notorized in a safety deposit box. And these public demonstations on YouTube establish what is called 'reducing to practice'. And give me more evidence and protection that I'm the inventor. But if I get the patent cool. But I can't worry about it. You can't invent something like this for money. Its too embarassing and all your family and friends desert you. No corp. could get the patent because of these public demonstrations.

  • @Th3Generat0r - you cannot patent a free energy generator. First you'd have to prove it does what you claim and you haven't. Connect the output to the input and see if it runs by itself. If it did it would be a perpetual motion machine and we all know that is impossible.

  • @zzytrewq very good correct on both.I filed for a improved gen.if you look at other free energy vidio's not all don't know it's imposible.this is not a per.mo.machine.I just don't like being rude.do you want to learn?read Hermann vonHelmholtz lecture on conservation of force.

  • @zzytrewq If it runs by itself, then it works, and is a perpetual motion machine, and we know perpetual motion machines are impossible, so this one, a perpetual motion machine that purportedly works, must be impossible, so we know it is impossible, not "even though" it works, but "precisely because" it works? Think about that one! It's quite odd, because, if you see a perpetual motion machine that does not work, you say PPMs don't work; if a PPM actually does work you have to rely on ignorance.

  • @jcfdillon - a PPM will never work so ignorance has nothing to do with it. If one appears to be working then it is a hoax or the measurements are inaccurate.

  • @zzytrewq can you come over and check it yourself please

  • @Th3Generat0r - why? What is there to see?

  • @Th3Generat0r Hopefully something good will come out of your confusion one day? eh?

  • @BRYCYNS Well, you right in this. I do not know much about patens. The thing is, GPL is the way it has to be shared but maybe you need to patent first. He has to investigate how to do this.

  • @omolivera Thank you I have the patent pending. Though most importantly I'm gonna be putting a final design up soon so I can give people measurments and a parts list. I have done the best I can. I was badly beaten on New Years Eve. I spent the first 4 mon. in bed. I'm just getting to where I can walk again and I'm having kidney trouble & I have 30 dogs I've rescued. *sob* *sob* The generator works! This is the answer! Steal the damn thing! Built it! Watch the other videos! Ask questions! Thanks!

  • @BRYCYNS I have apatent ped.

  • when will we be able to see a video of it working longer than 5 seconds. from the camera sample speed rate and the stroboscopic effect from light source it looked like it slowed down every time you left it alone otherwise it would remain a constant ....

    any one else see that... or is it me.

    the flywheel contraption looked wonky as well as out of alignment, probably worth turning it down round and true.

  • @redneckhillbillyjon The flywheel was perfect the machine was running perfectly. If sombody doesn't believe me now what possible good would it do to run it longer? How easy would that be to fake? I have no idea why anyone would believe any of these rediculous 'free energy' devices. Why would I put this stupid video up if all I was doing was try to fool somebody? What the hell do you want anyway? You people that criticize are just so weird to me. I'm saying creepy! Get a hobby or something. Chow.

  • Earnshaw's theorem from wiki*

    Pseudo-levitation constrains the movement of the magnets usually using some form of a tether or wall. This works because the theorem shows only that there is some direction in which there will be an instability. Limiting movement in that direction allows for levitation with fewer than the full 3 dimensions available for movement (note that the theorem is proven for 3 dimensions, not 1D or 2D).

    you didnt overcome anything.

  • @Danielde A+ it didn't,in I think 1995 I came up with a mag on top @bottom under presure.it seemed to work .then maybe 2yrs later a toy came out called the levitron it was a top that could huver on a mag.field seemingly level and the only thing that slowed it down was the air.everyone agreed centrefical force overcame its wanting to flipover.so i stoped useing the top mag.thats way i mad the wings

  • @FutebolFanatico001 i should of said matter not mass the speed of lieght has been proven annot to be fixed.

  • @rrnbob - you should not have slept through your Physics 101 lessons should you?

  • generator, your generator is flawed, your theory is wrong and your arm is providing for the rotational energy your machine is using. to generate,..energy. Do you see where this is a problem? there is no perpetual motion or net energy gain possible here. Regardless of weather you are using a "friction-less" bearing or not, you are still working against gravity, friction from atmosphere and with Newtonian Law. You are not a scientific Messiah. you're a tinkerer with an ego the size of a truck.

  • @zskeff i am such a fool to have not realized this before oh if only somone could of explained it so well that i could even understand but alas i now see they just do not care. not like you.your a mythical hero come to my rescue just like in my dreams oh thank you kind sir. its not that i have a big EGO its that i am the center of the universe and have the math to prove it.

  • Just as a reminder to everyone that say Einsteins equation can't be wrong...Not saying that it is... How ever has anyone kept score on how many time the "laws of physics" have been rewritten ? Anyone?? What ever happened to the Atom being the smallest thing in the universe??? That idea got "smashed apart"!!! REMEMBER most of the laws of physics are theoretical . Just because we haven't proved its wrong yet doesn't mean its right... And vice versa ...

  • @Curlychris831 - which particular laws of physics (especially relating to energy) have been re-written in the last 500 years? Which particular laws of physics are theoretical? Do you know what the scientific definition of "theory" is?

    The splitting of the atom did not change any laws of physics as there was no law stating an atom was the smallest particle. It was only an unproven belief.

  • @zzytrewq 1931 pauli's neutrino postulate also neutrino's proved the ether is there .physics was not used to splite the atom just to explain it.Hahn discovered it and won the nobel prize for chemistry.the atom was not thought to be a particle at all.the speed of light has been proven to not be constant by federico capasso of harvard for one.photons have even been stoped therefor c^2 means nothing.there are many more .

  • @Th3Generat0r - so which laws (see I said laws) of physics have changed?  You are confusing scientific findings that changed thinking with changes to laws. There was never a law that said the speed of light is constant - the speed slows through different mediums - big deal. C^2 applies because it is a conversion factor. It uses the speed of light in a vacuum. What on earth has stopping a photon got to do with anything?

    I gather you glanced through Wiki & now think you're a physicist. LOL

  • @zzytrewq nice try sonny now be a good boy and clean your room

  • @Th3Generat0r - that's the response I expect from someone who posts a video of a "free energy" device. So explain why C^2 means nothing or pull all your rubbish from YT.

  • dude you should contact the orion project, they are looking for people like you

  • Do you have to sit there and spin the wheel to keep it going or do you plug an electric motor in to turn this wheel? This is counter productive, using more energy than it produces = junk.

  • even though i'm still skeptical of your invention, i'm still very amazed and glad people like you exist to challenge the norm and to seek new ideas

    grats to you

  • @Qwerty48121 I'm still skeptical of my invention,thank you so much really thanks I just am speachless

  • i knew this was going to be interesting ten seconds in.

  • here the problem man you can only flow a certain amount of energy through that coil

  • Your likes outnumber the dislikes about 3-1. So I think you need to put some numbers out there top give a starting point. And a proposed profit or net gain would help people not as familiar.

  • I'm surprised you had the competency to record and upload this video. I'm even more surprised you had the ability to spell the URL correctly in order to find navigate to YouTube. Imbecile (that includes all you who liked this video).

  • Smells like BS to me..So much yaking and no action, couldn't watch it all.

  • Wow. You're all done! Time for you to smoke another joint... (Rolling eyes)

  • LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL, Einstein was wrong ??

  • @gconol I wish you had the honer to admit when I prove to you i am rieght I finely got robbiebanana to admit that there is an ether but he didn't get that it changed everthing.I'm shure you think he hade somthing to do with atomic energy

  • @Th3Generat0r A brilliant scientist that cannot even spell his batshit crazy claims :P

  • To much talking

  • Fascinating project. Have you presented your idea to the patent office?

    Have you tried running the machine for a longer period of time? If so, how long did it spin and create energy?

  • nice job Ray

  • Yeah well, dispite your arrogance if you've actually made thus efficient enough to power a large saw and itself i'd buy it, but I would have to be convinced first and that would require me to physically see it work, and that is not possible at this tine, maybe in 5 years.

  • @Development2112 Hello. Why is it not possible to come see it at this time? And why maybe in five years? Will you be up for parole then? But seriously folks take my wife please. Two physicists walked into a bar and met a rabbi a priest and a baptist minister. LOL OK so I'm not that funny but my arrogance makes up for it. You can come see it if you want to. A big table saw or a handsaw? I've been thinking to much. 83 characters remaining I hate to waste them. But I will.

  • where can i buy one,i want to power my house..thanks

  • @joeplacetas1 I have never offered anything like this before. But I can build you one. A really really good one. I have it all worked out now for the first time. Of course my later readings would have to verified by an outside source. And we would have to hire an electrical engineer or a graduate student to design the coils and make the circuits perfect. I'm a Journeyman Boiler Maker, a Journeyman Mechanic/Shipfitter, a nuclear valve welder with documents. Wendy Ray's a character. Call my bluff.

  • Amongst many glaring mistakes and the basic lack of understanding of physics presented here I just couldn't let this one pass sorry... e=m?! So... nuclear weapons don't exist then right? lol I suppose nuclear fusion research is a waste of time as well eh and all the tests carried out in particle accelerators must be giving totally incorrect results or are fundamentally flawed in their conception somehow too.

    Also... you might want to check out Newton's 3rd law of motion by the way.

  • I don't think your going to get enough rpm's to generate much. Sure you could go larger, but then you may run into problems with price and practicality.

  • you are an idiot... you don't realize that you have just contradicted yourself.. and C^2 is a proportionality constant.. einstein's theorem says that energy and matter are manifestations of the same thing... first of all you dont even need to delve into relativity to explain why this is wrong... second of all... you're pushing it with your hand

  • You are brilliant dude. I've been working on something similar but yours solves all the problems that I've been trying to overcome in mine. I just recently heard about pyrolitic graphite which is diamagnetic. This substance allows levitation without a stabilizing center axle thus even less friction. Perhaps this would be useful in a future upgraded version of the device.

  • My computer has died! It is officailly dead at this time. Unfortunately, I will not be able to get online for who knows how long. Thanks for your support!

  • Its not free energy. lol

  • does anything spin or in motion creates friction?

  • @Phoenix080805 great question here is the exact thing that makes science so much fun. exceedingly simple question or so it would seem on the surface. and one that all the really cool smart fun dudes like Xero555000 or Densetsu06 would never ask because the think they already know the answers. in simple terms: yes. but i'm going to get back to you with some really cool facts about friction later.

  • he said friction less?what about the surrounding space?

    

  • @Phoenix080805 you're absolutely right.

  • Are you going to liberate this by open source licence?

  • @omolivera even if somthing has a patent you can get a copy from the patent office and make and use it,you just can't sell it .

  • @Th3Generat0r I have really a passion for this machine, You see, in my country electricity is very expensive (as in everywhere) and we want to get off the grid. So if you will liberate the schematics of the machine via opensource I can find some other people enthusiastic to really construct it.

  • @omolivera you know life is short and the world has so many needs i'm seriously thinking abandoning my patents application. it would feel so good just to let this fly free.

  • @Th3Generat0r Sounds like a good idea. Taking the example of Linus Torvalds creator of the Linux operating system, releasing the plans to build your machine to the world would mean that many people from different fields of science could invest their time and take it to unimagined levels. As you say, let this fly free. On September 15 in New York, will take place the Open Source Hardware Summit, where they exhibited different machines based on the GPL. You may be interested. Twitter: @ oshsummit

  • @omolivera This is the only way Perpetual Motion can evolve; by everyone!

    The basic processes cannot be patented anyway but can developed on in specialist areas;

    this is where the money for it is at.

  • @Th3Generat0r yeah imagine the impact on the world, great job well done :)

  • So I read through the comments here...fabulous, funny, and sad really. Bro I'm sorry folks are slingin hate at you. I understood what you meant when you said E = M, you were just pointing out that there is a constant correlation between energy and mass, and that mass is, in fact, energy. While I don't think you've accomplished excess energy here, I do have an appreciation for a guy who can build a generator and share it with others. Rock on bro.

  • @djlivingfire I must say it truely is very sad and to think somone could see through the curtain is kind of spooky. My daughter just said that he got it, I've never seen anyone just plain getting it before. I wouldn't of ever admitted it or ever decide what the saddest part is. It's just a deep abyss.

  • @Th3Generat0r Dont fret my man. You gotta do you. God gives each of us a particular nature, and to deny that nature is the worst mistake we can make. You just keep after whatever it is you're after. Hint: There is only one complete quantity - the quantity of everything. Any quantity segregated therefrom and stopped is necessarily incomplete, and therefore experiences entropy. But the one quantity is, in fact, in perpetual motion. A motor within/segregated from the Quantity will stop alone

  • @djlivingfire ..continuted...think of it not as generating free, or excess, energy. Rather, think of it as the method if energy transfer without resistance. Look to Phi embedded within the Mandlebrot set for the pattern of transfer. Look toward a unidirectional quasi-crystal for electrical transfer. Maybe construct it yourself with one-way diodes. Tesla had some good insight into this. The quartz radio was possibly the greatest genius insight in mechanical history. Dont sweat the assholes

  • How do you overcome eddycurrentS?

  • @djlivingfire Powdered Iron core, as in MW Radio receivers or Laminated mild steel, as in Transformers...

  • @soros001 hhahahah ok.he ws wrng jst lolx.

    y modrn physcis acpts his rules, i dnt knw :/ all of the physict are actuly cn b wrng

    LLOLX