Added: 4 years ago
From: coyoteblog
Views: 8,133
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (13)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You are NOT getting enough views for a video series of this quality!

  • FANTASTIC! It's great to get all this great data into one place and in video is even better so it can reach the "non-readers" like that damn Gore movie did. Just wish there was a budget like his!

  • Excellent video. Thanks or posting. Why are we lied to so much about the data. The debate is by no means over as so many liberal GW spokespeople insist!

  • Absolutely exccellent discussion of the data! Well done!

  • Excellent video.

  • You think coyotoblog shall have peer reviewed papers?! You apparently a moron yourself. This videos isn't science itself. It is a presentation about science, based on that science (peer reviewed and settled in the areas of field). References to scientific papers would however be good. (I know it!)

  • Psst! Jimbo. It's over, Pal. Now all that remains is the arrests.

    First on the list is Maurice Strong who has THICK ROOTS intangled throughout all levels of the United Nations -- and who can't seem to wrap up his business, complete his Chery import deal with the communist Chinese so he can return to his home office in New York!

  • It is over. The US finally backed down in Bali, thank God. The public is coming around too, thanks to Gore, who will be remembered as the Ghandi of the enviromental movement.

    US congress today banned incandesenct light bulbs by 2020, raised auto mileage standards and Bush will sign. Finally, we are winning against ignorance and disbelief in science.

  • You are very, very misinformed. Do you always buy into media hyped propoganda? LOOK at the science! The fact that you even mention Gore tells everyone that you don't think for yourself.

  • why don't you yourself write a peer review article proving global warming, or would that be too much to ask? Or why not do your own video backing up your claims? REFUTE what the author as stated instead of just attacking the messenger.

  • Jimbo776 you exemplify the underhand unscientific methods of the eco-alarmists. refuse to discuss the actual data or the actual science, unfairly try to discredit the individual, and repeat the mantra.

  • Jimbo there are peer reviewed papers that agree with what this man is saying. Here are two to start with: Actually Read them

    2000 year global temperature reconstruction based on non tree ring proxies. Loehle_E&E_2007

    "Comments on "The Iris hypothesis: A negative or positive cloud feedback?" Ming-Dah CHOU et al.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more