And evolution is a theory, and a philosophy, thats all its ever been, no scientist denys that, most of evolution is not factual at all, but speculation and assumtion, i know a pathologist with a PH.d that told me that, and speculation and assumtion is not science!.
@Aheadstix85 ; No, evolution is not a theory: evolutionary theory is. Evolution is no more a philosophy than sunlight is. Your silly assertions don't impress anyone.
Yes, your reffering to Micro, that can be observed, and tested everywhere, one creature turning into something completely different over time is biologically impossible, and evolution happeing in seconds??, where have you observed that?
i think your talking out of your arse!, i know guys that have studied biology and other sciences for 10 years, i have studied biology myself, and i know most of evolution is bullshit.
Um?, no evolution is not observed, tell me?, just how do you observe something that apparently takes millions of years?, thats right!, you cant!, thats illogical, you have not thought this through, i have studies biology and have frinds that have studied science for over 10 years, evolution as a theory is nothing other than speculation, thats not science!, no creature can change into something completely different, thats biological fact!.
@Aheadstix85 ; Of course evolution is observed, silly. You see it happening all the time. Evolution does not take millions of years: it takes a second. Sheeeish. And evolution is not a theory; evolutionary theory is.
No its not, if you knew anything about Biology you would know that, looking at the human cell, the proteins form outside the cell centre, that mens it ignores any natural selection process, that means any cell only ever splits into a human cell, that measn we have only ever been humans, nothing else, thats basic biology mate, also we as humans are the only species that can identify Rhythm in music, apes cannot, so how did we evolve from them?, there are hundred of other factors aswell.
I think one of the hurdles anti-evolutionists face, is that evolution itself is nothing more than a process and is not actually making any intended choices. Species mutation will just occur and if that mutation just happens to contribute to the species success, it is more likely to be passed on through following generations. Species do not try to tailor themselves to an environment, just those who will best survive in that environment will be more prevalent..
Evolutionary Theory is a religion of it's own. It is not based on science but in fact is just a widely spread story that Evolutionists just accept and believe as fact. It's all in how they observe their reality. A title of a Youtube video that proves that Evolution of Life from Nothing Can't Happen. It required God, the programmer of all life.
Scientists presents Proof of Intelligent Design ! Charles Darwin - Origin of Species - Evolution Disproved,
@pbrage1 EEH!, wrong, evolution is a philosophy, not science, its also a religion as it requires belief in something that has never been proven.
Basic biology completely debunks abiogensis, no life can come from non living materials, its biologically impossible, life does not come from the ocean by mixing chemicals, those chemicals diffuse, they do not mix, basic biology proves evolution false, as nothing changes over time.
@pbrage1 Evolution is a philosophy, based on assumption and speculation, not fact, i was told this by a science student of 10 years, i also know pathologists, and i myself have studied biology, abiogensis is not a fact, it is a lie, no life can come from dead or non living matter, its biologically impossible!, there for there must have been a creator, as all logic points to that fact, you can not get around it, also Natural selection is also false.
Evolutionists, answer me one question! How can the evolution theory be true, when the greater book of truth says something else? It is written on pages, easy to understand and read. Christianity is for everyone who can read!
As for the theory of evolution, if you ever find anything wrong about it, please write a paper and submit it to a science journal: it's your duty as a human being.
"How can the evolution theory be true, when the greater book of truth says something else?"
I'm not following your logic. You're saying that the opinion of virtually the entire scientific community is trumped by a book that mentions a talking donkey?
No, Christianity is for anyone who wishes to BLINDLY accept the words of ONE book that is interpreted to match THEIR own idea of a comfortable explanation of whatever they want.
The Cat in the Hat is easy to read and as easily noticed as fiction.
The term "evolutionist" is not a real descriptor; people do not follow a doctrine or dogma or evolution, they simply recognize the facts and have trust in those facts, only because the evidence is repeatably provable.
and i'm sure when God said let there be something,there prob. was some massive explosions when atoms split,cells formed,etc.....even much greater than the sub sounds of thunder. atoms split when something is formed and also like the atomic bomb.
The point in evolution in animals would be to ensure the animals survival and mortality. If humans evolved from monkeys why then are there still monkeys?After all they would not survive unless they evolved right? Two completely retarded adults can give birth to completely healthy offspring.Generations may pass,but eventually completely normal parents will give birth to a retarded child.If evolution is true then why has a human never give birth to a monkey?
Please don't try to explain something you have never studied. Humans and other primates have a shared common ancestor that eventually derived the entire primate family. That is why monkeys still exist, I learned that on day one. Shared. Common. Ancestry.
Oh and how very Christian (and ironic) of you to call someone completely retarded as opposed to "normal". My handicapped brother (who understands science) would have appreciated that.
@goozmit Thats bullshit!, if you actually study biology you would know that the ape to human DNA racio is irrelevant, the exact number is more like 95%, and if you look at it, its more like 1 billion 5 hundred page novels worth of information, not error, so common designer is a much better and logical explanation, then common ancestor, its also a fact that apes connot find rhythm is music, only humans can, so how did we evolve from them?.
You need to go back to elementary school and learn some spelling and grammar. Most importantly of all, you need to learn NOT TO WRITE RUN-ON SENTENCES. Nobody can understand your incoherent run-on ramblings.
Cont....be half-right in their understanding of the creation of the universe or the origin of humanity. Together however, the picture is complete and harmonious. We (believers) all realize that God was Creator, but how often do we consider what was involved in that creation? God was a chemist, a physicist, an astronomer, a biologist. He was most certainly an artist, a maker of all of our world's beauty. He was the lawmaker of all of the unseen forces that make "nature" orderly and predictable
@agentgooner007 That fact is evolution has no answer for the complexities of all life on this planet, so exactly how can it be correct?!, science still to this day cannot recognise half of the thousands of un discovered life forms on this planet, just more proof of evolutionary assumption!, which is not science.
Heres a quote from Dr Jonathan sarfati. if you really think your brain is an evolved monkeys brain, evolved for survival, then how do you trust it for logic!?.
@Aheadstix85 Oh just so you don't get me wrong I MOST certainly don't agree with the likes of Richard Dawkins and his completely flawed logic of writing a book called The God delusion and start his antithesis with "something happened and a 25 protein cell piggybacked on a crystal" lol "something happened" lmao.
I did enjoy him squirming in his seat when he did have to concede to Ben Stein that there is a possibility of Intelligent Design (for no other reason than for his unbearable arrogance)
@Aheadstix85 Except that it does, descent with modification can and does produce complexity regularly, for instance cecal valves in Italian wall lizards
There has been a tremendous amount of disagreement between science and religion, each side armed with its own obvious facts to refute the other. People of science and religion need not disagree so often if they would realize that their different observations are the result of each looking only at opposite sides of the same coin. The contradictory evidence is actually an illusion, caused by omission, which virtually guarantees that alone, either scientific theory or religious doctrine can only...
Yes, anyone with a high school education or better will tell you where gravity came from and how it attracts mass. If you were actually interested you would attend some remedial education classes on the subject, or spend some time with WikiPedia.
@kpreston69 just keep an eye on the history channel, science channel, places like that. i cant recall the name of the program but i know they had one where they explained it in terms that were easy to grasp. and the animations helped me out too lol.
Nice video...but one minor correction. Baryons and atomic nuclei formed within the first 3 minutes after the big bang, not 600,000 years. Hydrogen and helium were already present at this time, which is about whent the universe becamce transperant.
According to Irreducible Complexity, Explain the reverse of the evolutionary process that can account for the Cardiovascular system of the Giraffes neck. You said the bombardier beetle does not need all of its parts to work, please explain how this can apply to a giraffe neck. The rete mirabile Within the neck must exist in all of its complexity and fully the way it is or else the pressure and force of the blood can kill the giraffe or cause the giraffe to pass out from blood leaving its brain.
"i will explain for $200" ? Can you not maintain professional intellectual integrity and maturity when debating scientifically? So i take it you do not hold any degree's which enforce your theoretical opinions.
You do understand the law of biogenesis dont you? That life comes from life. Even if you could explain the evolution of the giraffe you would still need to account for how the first living organism came about, And once again as i have said before, The only logical explanation is creation
If you want me to educate you, you will have to pay for the priviliage. Otherwise you can spent five minutes educating yourself on the subject.
What the bloody fuck makes you believe you have the right to demand my time educating you, when all you need to know on the subject is already available to you on the 'net?
What degrees do you hold that can account for your opinionated explanations? To take it a little further, How can you account for the beginning of the universe and life as we know it. The first particle or atom or molecule, The first anything that could start anything, The big bang or Whatever it is you believe. Is creationism not the only logical explanation to this phenomenon? "Ex Nihilo"
it also makes me smile how you cut the video into parts you can argue with but leave the parts you cant argue with. like the Assumptions of Evolution, the fact is Evolution was build on lots of this that have to of happend for it to work, but they dont teach that cause its such a load of crap you would get laughed at! and charles darwin told people on his death bed there must of been a creator? the world was to complex?!? so the guy your quoting as your arguement also called your ideas stupid!
Duane Gish claimed that hydrogen peroxide and hydroquinones would explode spontaneously if mixed without a chemical inhibitor, and that the beetle starts with a mix of all three and adds an anti-inhibitor when he wants the explosion.
An experiment was conducted in 1978 with Duane Gish present. A group of scientists, with great fanfare and wearing bio suits, mixed the chemicals named. The result? The mixture turned brown...no explosion.
Why does this subject seem to bother you so much? If evolution is true, just have another beer and relax. Who cares? You put an awful lot of energy into a meaningless video.
Your comment is quiet laughable to be honest. From your comment i assume you think all morality comes from the bible or what ever holy book you adhere to. This of course only proves morality does not come from these books as they are full of immoral stories, thereby showing that you have the inherant ability to pick and choose which stories (morals) you follow. How do you know which ones are moral if God is saying all of them are?
Oh, like you have the skills required to understand what is in a 2000 year old book (older if you count the jewish texts), besides, even if it was meant to be read as "eons", please explain the talking snake for me again...
And I've already said what was the catalyst for the singular force breaking apart.
Again, when enough energy to make the universe we have is compressed into a dot smaller then a neutron, he tends to get unimaginably hot and the singular force broke apart causing space and time of this universe.
The alleged Big Bang has EVERYTHING to do with evolution, freaktard! Nothing explodes, becomes the universe, develops chemicals that come to life all by themselves, etc.. It's all one big lie.
Only the creationist are the ones saying it came from nothing.
More like the big bang come from energy and the unifying force made up from the 4 fundamental forces of, gravity, electromagnetic, weak and strong nuclear force.
Those broke apart and started to expand creating space and time, aka the universe, as we know it.
And this is the most explanation I can give. Anymore detailed would obviously be way over your head.
"The alleged Big Bang has EVERYTHING to do with evolution, freaktard!"
Your statement makes the assumption that it has to be one of two extremes, God or no God. So I ask you, why couldn't it be that God created the universe and made one lifeform that eventually evolved into the different lifeforms that exist now?
Oh, and please try to keep your answer from contradicting that little statement of yours that I put at the top of this comment between that lovely pair of quotation marks.
"So I ask you, why couldn't it be that God created the universe and made one lifeform that eventually evolved into the different lifeforms that exist now?"
Because the Bible says that when the universe (creation) was in its sixth day, man was created. It also says that death did not exist until Adam rebelled; and for evolution to take you from pond scum to cell to fish to ape to man, you have to have couintless generations die off before the arrival of humanity.
So the reason you have for it not being possible for God to have made the universe and life and then let that life evolve is because the Bible says something different. However, wouldn't that argument also work even if "God created the universe and life" was replaced with "the big bang created the universe and abiogenesis created life"?
Hmmm... It would seem that whether the big bang happened doesn't really make any difference as to whether evolution happened.
So will you claim that your argument only applies to the possibility of there being a God and evolution, take back your statement that the big bang has everything to do with evolution, continue to claim that disproving the big bang disproves evolution, or something else?
they can't even go to the nearest planet in their own solar system (mars ,the moon being a satellite) but yet speculate on the creation of the universe!the theory of evolution is today's theory of the earth's flatness for it is not logical at all!
well what u call oxford biology professor and universe observer such as urself are not sure anymore abt the distances between earth and the nearest stars!! ur so called oxford and harvard professors were the ones making "global warming" an irrefutable science fact" which in reality is a scam! so before calling people idiots u better use what u have between ur 2 ears!
Global warming is a fact. More then enough evidence to support it.
And not sure about the distance between earth at the nearest stars? Oh really? You don't even know how that is measured probably.
And wtf would that even have to do with evolution or the big bang to begin with? Really if pulling things out of your ass is the best you have, then you must of gotten that "degree" at a degree mill.
guys stop making fun of desertphile. he saw the big bang with his own eyes. he knows his shit ok? plus his hair looks really cool and his voice isn't annoying at all! he doesn't resemble a 40 year old virgin making youtube videos in grandmas basement. "Win" is stamped all over him!!
haha i watched the anti-evolution guys video first...and was just scratching my head ..like "this guy used to believe in evolution??? cause it sounds like he doesnt know fuck all about it!" Thanks for debunking his bullshit, and being humorous at the same time
Animals don't evolve from one to another, like a horse becoming an elephant. Individuals don't evolve. Populations evolve from one generation to the next. Generation time determines rate of change. This is why bacteria or flies adapt so quickly to changes in their environment.
So that means all organisms can slow became anything. So it's possible for horses to slowly become elephants given lots of generatios and time (millions of year).
"So it's possible for horses to slowly become elephants given lots of generatios and time"
No. But they could become similar to elephants. This is called convergence. Ichthyosaurs were aquatic reptiles which looked like dolphins. Similar environments can lead to similar creatures given enough time.
I have a crude explanation of that. What if unicorns were hunted for the horn in the middle of their foreheads like elephants are being hunted for their tusks then somewhere along the line, before they were all killed off, a mutation occured, probably the lost of the gene responsible for the horn in his face. The could be why pigs don't have tusks. Well as for dragons, hey would it help if I said all dragons probably didn't have wings.
Wild pig tusks are just overgrown teeth. Domesticated pigs still have teeth. Pig farmers have artificially selected against tusks. Pigs can be dangerous, even without sharp tusks.
Wait, this has to be one of those cut a pasted videoes. I been meaning to bring this up, but evolution can't come from splattered anything. This isn't funny! A creationist wouldn't say some s*** like that.
Doesn't a dentist have to be a doctor in the first place to write prescriptions and have to have a PHD in Dentistry? Not that his creationist bullshit means anything. The funny thing about creationism is that every time they put forth an example of how evolution could not have done something, you find out just how beautiful evolution is and how much it has accomplished on the living earth, and how ignorant they are.
How come you didn't read all of it. Micro-evolution is compatable with creationism, Even though there have been genetic mutations, natural selections, and genetic variations, the beetles still produced beetles
I've probably said this before, Micro-evolution is very real because it has been PROVEN time and again. Macro-evolution leaves to many questions. I mean after hearing about the "Piltdown Man or was it Pitfall Man", don't remember exactly what they called it but surely you can understand the need for such skepticism?
If people are going to refute a theory, they must first know what the word theory means. Secondly one must understand the scientific method. Then one must present data(evidence) and a hypothesis that explains the data. If the explanation fits the data, and it must do so always, it is then a "Theory" If you can produce a theory that supports the current evidence, then you have a case. If not, shut the fuck up! Pissing on knowledge for selfish reasons is unethical an unmoral.
mejc2. Evolution happened. It happens right now. It always happens where there is biological life. Every theory is an explanation. It is not evidence. The evidence is what the research has come up with. Data. The theory explains the evidence and what it means. Also, we all know that you don`t believe in evolution because you don`t want to believe. If you debate a subject you know nothing about, and then deny the evidence refuting your default position, you give away your true reason for belief.
Everytime someone mention God, the first thing come to mind is an invisible magical person. How did humans "evolve" from fishs? It is genetically unsound. There has never been a time when an animal gradually became another animal which in turn gradually became another animal. What is to stop me from saying that these prehistoric men are an arrangement of different apes from ugliest to prettiest?
I just thought up an experiment. We should find every spieces of apes on the planet. Just one of each. But here is the sad part, we have to kill them and skin them meatless in order to get an idea of their skeletal structures.
It took a while to figure where you might be coming from. Are you sugesting that due to the probability of extinction among monkeys that some of the monkeys spieces might have gone extincted?
All organisms in the animal and plant kingdoms thrive off of oxygen. Is this true? Does this include apes? How do we make sure these aren't apes? This just it, I see these bones an see an array of monkeys. Sorry.
I suggested this before and I think vadont said it won't work. We should find every spieces of apes on the planet. Just one of each. But here is the sad part, we have to kill them and skin them meatless in order to get an idea of their skeletal structures. So how many matches do you think we'll get.
Good question! That's what makes it so challenging. They're so similar it's almost impossible to tell in some cases. That's what we mean by "transitional". It doesn't mean "that magic number which connects all the dots", it just means one step along the way. Humans and all their recent ancestors are apes, but distinguishing them from one another isn't easy. See Ken Miller's "Only A Theory" for a chart showing disagreement among Creationists as to whether the specimens are human or ape.
No, it's a book. It's a great read and very accessible to the layperson, and I highly recommend it. There's a review on my channel. Basically, prominent creationists like Gish and Dembski and others in their various books make the claim that these primate skeletons are obviously either ape or human, but the chart shows their conclusions do not match. They disagree more about the nature of the skeletons than they agree.
>>There has never been a time when an animal gradually became another animal which in turn gradually became another animal.
How do you know? As for the bit about the apes, we are all apes. The prehistoric ancestors are arranged from oldest to most recent. Ugly and pretty are subjective, but time is not.
What if a very smart person had a big browridge and he died and his bones were dug up. What is some one saw that and said he was an ape? That's scary! So maybe ugly and pretty are subjective, but evolution takes a long time. I heard people digging up "humanoid" bone structures and they were said to be exceedingly tall!
Hominid species have been classified using many characteristics, only one of which is skull structure. You might try reading up on human evolution, that would be the first step to understanding it.
No, no human giants have ever been found. You'd have to show me a photo if you claim otherwise.
By the way, how was your sailing trip. Do you take music along with you? Can you hear the wind or is the sound of the wind reduced because you are moving with it? With a modern sailboat and modern technology, how long can you stay out without stopping at a port.
"I have also read many articles and papers written by Evolutionists (sic)."
"Evolutionists" don't exist.
"It is Evolutionism that I deny."
"Evolutionism" does not exist.
Now you are denying yourself because you, my friend are an evolutionist and you accept evolutionism. You deny and ridicule any evidence that might contradict evolutionism but gleefully accept any hint of a suggestion that evolutionism is true. that is an evolutionist.
Damn lay off the whiskey bro... you are far from intelligent ... horrible presentation. and shave for goodness sakes..
ZayZayLuchiano 1 month ago
This guy has many traits of the homosexual. Hmmm?!
thechessstick 1 month ago
This guy is a cabin in the woods away from sending explosive packages.
radkerson 5 months ago
creationists... lol...
Carlovfx 5 months ago
And evolution is a theory, and a philosophy, thats all its ever been, no scientist denys that, most of evolution is not factual at all, but speculation and assumtion, i know a pathologist with a PH.d that told me that, and speculation and assumtion is not science!.
Aheadstix85 1 year ago
@Aheadstix85 ; No, evolution is not a theory: evolutionary theory is. Evolution is no more a philosophy than sunlight is. Your silly assertions don't impress anyone.
Desertphile 1 year ago 3
Yes, your reffering to Micro, that can be observed, and tested everywhere, one creature turning into something completely different over time is biologically impossible, and evolution happeing in seconds??, where have you observed that?
i think your talking out of your arse!, i know guys that have studied biology and other sciences for 10 years, i have studied biology myself, and i know most of evolution is bullshit.
Aheadstix85 1 year ago
Um?, no evolution is not observed, tell me?, just how do you observe something that apparently takes millions of years?, thats right!, you cant!, thats illogical, you have not thought this through, i have studies biology and have frinds that have studied science for over 10 years, evolution as a theory is nothing other than speculation, thats not science!, no creature can change into something completely different, thats biological fact!.
Aheadstix85 1 year ago
@Aheadstix85 ; Of course evolution is observed, silly. You see it happening all the time. Evolution does not take millions of years: it takes a second. Sheeeish. And evolution is not a theory; evolutionary theory is.
Desertphile 1 year ago
No its not, if you knew anything about Biology you would know that, looking at the human cell, the proteins form outside the cell centre, that mens it ignores any natural selection process, that means any cell only ever splits into a human cell, that measn we have only ever been humans, nothing else, thats basic biology mate, also we as humans are the only species that can identify Rhythm in music, apes cannot, so how did we evolve from them?, there are hundred of other factors aswell.
Aheadstix85 1 year ago
I think one of the hurdles anti-evolutionists face, is that evolution itself is nothing more than a process and is not actually making any intended choices. Species mutation will just occur and if that mutation just happens to contribute to the species success, it is more likely to be passed on through following generations. Species do not try to tailor themselves to an environment, just those who will best survive in that environment will be more prevalent..
Tunnelfish 1 year ago
Evolutionary Theory is a religion of it's own. It is not based on science but in fact is just a widely spread story that Evolutionists just accept and believe as fact. It's all in how they observe their reality. A title of a Youtube video that proves that Evolution of Life from Nothing Can't Happen. It required God, the programmer of all life.
Scientists presents Proof of Intelligent Design ! Charles Darwin - Origin of Species - Evolution Disproved,
krazeekooladam 1 year ago
@krazeekooladam ; Stop masturbating in my channel.
Desertphile 1 year ago
@krazeekooladam Yes correct, even basic biology debunks evolution, and abiogenesis, ofcourse, evolution is no science its philosophy.
Aheadstix85 1 year ago
Creationism is based entirely on ancient myths from thousands of years ago
Evolution is a proven concept based on modern scientific understanding and research of the natural world.
Why do some people still choose to believe in ancient creation myths over reality which demonstrates that evolution is real??
I know several biologists and not one of them believes in "creationism."
I have found it is only religious people with little or no understanding of biology who believe in creationism.
pbrage1 1 year ago
@pbrage1 EEH!, wrong, evolution is a philosophy, not science, its also a religion as it requires belief in something that has never been proven.
Basic biology completely debunks abiogensis, no life can come from non living materials, its biologically impossible, life does not come from the ocean by mixing chemicals, those chemicals diffuse, they do not mix, basic biology proves evolution false, as nothing changes over time.
Aheadstix85 1 year ago
@pbrage1 Evolution is a philosophy, based on assumption and speculation, not fact, i was told this by a science student of 10 years, i also know pathologists, and i myself have studied biology, abiogensis is not a fact, it is a lie, no life can come from dead or non living matter, its biologically impossible!, there for there must have been a creator, as all logic points to that fact, you can not get around it, also Natural selection is also false.
Aheadstix85 1 year ago
@Aheadstix85 ; "Evolution is a philosophy...."
In the exact same sense that sunlight is a philosophy. In the exact same sense gravity is a philosophy.
Meanwhile, evolution is still observed to happen. Try again.
Desertphile 1 year ago
@Aheadstix85
There's no such thing as "biologically impossible". You are talking complete nonsense.
Heathenfidel 1 year ago
Are all your videos as excellent?
I may have to sub you.
Great stuff!
How how how are you anyways?
Ok you're subbed.
You had me at how how how.
bigboy45454545 2 years ago
Evolutionists, answer me one question! How can the evolution theory be true, when the greater book of truth says something else? It is written on pages, easy to understand and read. Christianity is for everyone who can read!
m4rk7h0r 2 years ago
What is/are "evolutionists?"
As for the theory of evolution, if you ever find anything wrong about it, please write a paper and submit it to a science journal: it's your duty as a human being.
Desertphile 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"How can the evolution theory be true, when the greater book of truth says something else?"
I'm not following your logic. You're saying that the opinion of virtually the entire scientific community is trumped by a book that mentions a talking donkey?
Mickster6988240 2 years ago
No, Christianity is for anyone who wishes to BLINDLY accept the words of ONE book that is interpreted to match THEIR own idea of a comfortable explanation of whatever they want.
The Cat in the Hat is easy to read and as easily noticed as fiction.
The term "evolutionist" is not a real descriptor; people do not follow a doctrine or dogma or evolution, they simply recognize the facts and have trust in those facts, only because the evidence is repeatably provable.
barebowarchery 1 year ago
@barebowarchery i totally agree with you
m4rk7h0r 1 year ago
and i'm sure when God said let there be something,there prob. was some massive explosions when atoms split,cells formed,etc.....even much greater than the sub sounds of thunder. atoms split when something is formed and also like the atomic bomb.
shotsxxx 2 years ago
The point in evolution in animals would be to ensure the animals survival and mortality. If humans evolved from monkeys why then are there still monkeys?After all they would not survive unless they evolved right? Two completely retarded adults can give birth to completely healthy offspring.Generations may pass,but eventually completely normal parents will give birth to a retarded child.If evolution is true then why has a human never give birth to a monkey?
shotsxxx 2 years ago
Please don't try to explain something you have never studied. Humans and other primates have a shared common ancestor that eventually derived the entire primate family. That is why monkeys still exist, I learned that on day one. Shared. Common. Ancestry.
Oh and how very Christian (and ironic) of you to call someone completely retarded as opposed to "normal". My handicapped brother (who understands science) would have appreciated that.
Maybe your parents gave birth to a monkey.
goozmit 1 year ago
@goozmit Thats bullshit!, if you actually study biology you would know that the ape to human DNA racio is irrelevant, the exact number is more like 95%, and if you look at it, its more like 1 billion 5 hundred page novels worth of information, not error, so common designer is a much better and logical explanation, then common ancestor, its also a fact that apes connot find rhythm is music, only humans can, so how did we evolve from them?.
Aheadstix85 1 year ago
@Aheadstix85 ; The "ape to human ratio" is 100%, silly. Humans =ARE= apes.
Desertphile 1 year ago
@Aheadstix85
You need to go back to elementary school and learn some spelling and grammar. Most importantly of all, you need to learn NOT TO WRITE RUN-ON SENTENCES. Nobody can understand your incoherent run-on ramblings.
Heathenfidel 1 year ago
Cont....be half-right in their understanding of the creation of the universe or the origin of humanity. Together however, the picture is complete and harmonious. We (believers) all realize that God was Creator, but how often do we consider what was involved in that creation? God was a chemist, a physicist, an astronomer, a biologist. He was most certainly an artist, a maker of all of our world's beauty. He was the lawmaker of all of the unseen forces that make "nature" orderly and predictable
agentgooner007 2 years ago
@agentgooner007 That fact is evolution has no answer for the complexities of all life on this planet, so exactly how can it be correct?!, science still to this day cannot recognise half of the thousands of un discovered life forms on this planet, just more proof of evolutionary assumption!, which is not science.
Heres a quote from Dr Jonathan sarfati. if you really think your brain is an evolved monkeys brain, evolved for survival, then how do you trust it for logic!?.
Aheadstix85 1 year ago
@Aheadstix85 I wrote what I did a year ago and don't think that it's that important anymore (I did't really at the time).
Take care.
agentgooner007 1 year ago
@agentgooner007 Why??.
Aheadstix85 1 year ago
@Aheadstix85 Oh just so you don't get me wrong I MOST certainly don't agree with the likes of Richard Dawkins and his completely flawed logic of writing a book called The God delusion and start his antithesis with "something happened and a 25 protein cell piggybacked on a crystal" lol "something happened" lmao.
I did enjoy him squirming in his seat when he did have to concede to Ben Stein that there is a possibility of Intelligent Design (for no other reason than for his unbearable arrogance)
agentgooner007 1 year ago
@Aheadstix85 Except that it does, descent with modification can and does produce complexity regularly, for instance cecal valves in Italian wall lizards
talkorigins(.)org/indexcc/CA/CA120.html
TheScienceFoundation 1 year ago
There has been a tremendous amount of disagreement between science and religion, each side armed with its own obvious facts to refute the other. People of science and religion need not disagree so often if they would realize that their different observations are the result of each looking only at opposite sides of the same coin. The contradictory evidence is actually an illusion, caused by omission, which virtually guarantees that alone, either scientific theory or religious doctrine can only...
agentgooner007 2 years ago
Can someone tell me where this GRAVITY came from and how GRAVITY attracts expanding gasses to form hydrogen and stars.
I am eager to learn and open minded to both sides of the coin.
This seems to get me stuck every time someone brings up the big bang "THEORY" or the "THEORY" of evolution.
I also have a mental block trying to understand how a creature can change it's entire structure over climate change and searching for food.
please email with some type of reasoning.
KP
kpreston69 2 years ago
Yes, anyone with a high school education or better will tell you where gravity came from and how it attracts mass. If you were actually interested you would attend some remedial education classes on the subject, or spend some time with WikiPedia.
Desertphile 2 years ago
their is plenty of info out there for you, the internet is full of info and youtube has some great videos if you are really interested
however you really need to have at least a bit of background education, at least at the high school graduate level to really understand most of it
You cannot be taught physics, cosmology or biology in an email
chobochotch 2 years ago
@kpreston69 just keep an eye on the history channel, science channel, places like that. i cant recall the name of the program but i know they had one where they explained it in terms that were easy to grasp. and the animations helped me out too lol.
hessian144 1 year ago
:) :) :)
Great Video
:)
managadzed 2 years ago
Nice video...but one minor correction. Baryons and atomic nuclei formed within the first 3 minutes after the big bang, not 600,000 years. Hydrogen and helium were already present at this time, which is about whent the universe becamce transperant.
whitenerd108 2 years ago
According to Irreducible Complexity, Explain the reverse of the evolutionary process that can account for the Cardiovascular system of the Giraffes neck. You said the bombardier beetle does not need all of its parts to work, please explain how this can apply to a giraffe neck. The rete mirabile Within the neck must exist in all of its complexity and fully the way it is or else the pressure and force of the blood can kill the giraffe or cause the giraffe to pass out from blood leaving its brain.
schmoovit 2 years ago
I will explain the evolution of the giraffe for $200. You may either pay me via paypal or you may use Google and discover the information for free.
Desertphile 2 years ago
"i will explain for $200" ? Can you not maintain professional intellectual integrity and maturity when debating scientifically? So i take it you do not hold any degree's which enforce your theoretical opinions.
You do understand the law of biogenesis dont you? That life comes from life. Even if you could explain the evolution of the giraffe you would still need to account for how the first living organism came about, And once again as i have said before, The only logical explanation is creation
schmoovit 2 years ago
If you want me to educate you, you will have to pay for the priviliage. Otherwise you can spent five minutes educating yourself on the subject.
What the bloody fuck makes you believe you have the right to demand my time educating you, when all you need to know on the subject is already available to you on the 'net?
Desertphile 2 years ago
What degrees do you hold that can account for your opinionated explanations? To take it a little further, How can you account for the beginning of the universe and life as we know it. The first particle or atom or molecule, The first anything that could start anything, The big bang or Whatever it is you believe. Is creationism not the only logical explanation to this phenomenon? "Ex Nihilo"
schmoovit 2 years ago
Good work mate keep it up!!!
stathmopoda 2 years ago
all dentists are creationists
baskoffie 2 years ago 2
What makes you think that?
MrKrov 2 years ago
"What makes you think that?"
It was a joke.
Desertphile 2 years ago
Eh, I wasn't sure.
MrKrov 2 years ago
it also makes me smile how you cut the video into parts you can argue with but leave the parts you cant argue with. like the Assumptions of Evolution, the fact is Evolution was build on lots of this that have to of happend for it to work, but they dont teach that cause its such a load of crap you would get laughed at! and charles darwin told people on his death bed there must of been a creator? the world was to complex?!? so the guy your quoting as your arguement also called your ideas stupid!
nubeckett 2 years ago
"...but leave the parts you cant argue with."
And you "know" that how, exactly? Do you read people's minds?
Desertphile 2 years ago
Comment removed
nubeckett 2 years ago
I'm glad you were able to sue all the larger words on your "Learn a word each Day" calendar.
It's just too bad that you don't have greater intrinsic command of the English language.
solly7 2 years ago
Duane Gish claimed that hydrogen peroxide and hydroquinones would explode spontaneously if mixed without a chemical inhibitor, and that the beetle starts with a mix of all three and adds an anti-inhibitor when he wants the explosion.
An experiment was conducted in 1978 with Duane Gish present. A group of scientists, with great fanfare and wearing bio suits, mixed the chemicals named. The result? The mixture turned brown...no explosion.
Wonko101 2 years ago
The Bible says the earth is flat.
And that the sun revolves around the earth.
And that humans are made of dirt.
And that snakes, donkeys, and bushes talk.
And that animals appeared AFTER man but BEFORE woman.
I suppose this is a better source of information
than the careful collection and examination of data?
Imaginefree69 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
when i look into an atheist's eyes all i see is fear
wordsdontdescribeme 3 years ago
"when i look into an atheist's eyes all i see is fear"
Don't point a hand gun at them, you violent shit.
Desertphile 3 years ago
lol
Anidem9 2 years ago
When I see a Creationist, all I see is ignorance, stupidity, religion (not science in any way whatsoever), and fear.
Anidem9 2 years ago
and COOKIES!
Kretain 2 years ago 2
Why does this subject seem to bother you so much? If evolution is true, just have another beer and relax. Who cares? You put an awful lot of energy into a meaningless video.
psa277 3 years ago
"Why does this subject seem to bother you so much?"
For the same reason rape bothers me.
Desertphile 3 years ago
The same questions applies. If evolution is true, what would be the basis for any inherent significance to anything? So...why should rape bother you?
Do you appeal to some non-existent moral code?
psa277 3 years ago
"So...why should rape bother you?"
Retard.
Desertphile 3 years ago
Your comment is quiet laughable to be honest. From your comment i assume you think all morality comes from the bible or what ever holy book you adhere to. This of course only proves morality does not come from these books as they are full of immoral stories, thereby showing that you have the inherant ability to pick and choose which stories (morals) you follow. How do you know which ones are moral if God is saying all of them are?
Smithyis1337 3 years ago
Would you be bothered if the people making medicine for combating viruses didn't know that viruses evolve resistances to the drugs used against them?
markermage 3 years ago
You put an awful lot of energy into a meaningless video.
Answer.
His videos are not meaningless.
The 6 day thing, well its wrong.
It was wrongly translated. It should be in what we now know as eons although that term wouldn't have existed then.
The bible really needs to be translated from the near as original works.
Western translations are full of errors.
wannabeebee 3 years ago
ehrm, if you start to "retranslate" into whatever you want it to say, then your not really reading the same book twice now are ye? :I
Kretain 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I havent a clue what you are babbling on about but if we had a debate you would lose.
If you were some kind of TV personality and wanted a public debate where I would win and get paid then fine.
But you are not are you.Unless you have good ancient language skills you dont know what you are talking about,
wannabeebee 2 years ago
Oh please. A chimp could debate a creationist and win.
Anidem9 2 years ago
Oh, like you have the skills required to understand what is in a 2000 year old book (older if you count the jewish texts), besides, even if it was meant to be read as "eons", please explain the talking snake for me again...
Kretain 2 years ago
And I've already said what was the catalyst for the singular force breaking apart.
Again, when enough energy to make the universe we have is compressed into a dot smaller then a neutron, he tends to get unimaginably hot and the singular force broke apart causing space and time of this universe.
mecher3k 3 years ago
"...but the Big Bang had and has..." Yes, that makes it clear. Smoke another doob, you fool.
piranha70 3 years ago
The alleged Big Bang has EVERYTHING to do with evolution, freaktard! Nothing explodes, becomes the universe, develops chemicals that come to life all by themselves, etc.. It's all one big lie.
piranha70 3 years ago
"The alleged Big Bang has EVERYTHING to do with evolution..."
I have no idea what "The alleged Big Bang"is, but the Big Bang had and has nothing at all to do with evolution. I suggest you grow up.
Desertphile 3 years ago
Only the creationist are the ones saying it came from nothing.
More like the big bang come from energy and the unifying force made up from the 4 fundamental forces of, gravity, electromagnetic, weak and strong nuclear force.
Those broke apart and started to expand creating space and time, aka the universe, as we know it.
And this is the most explanation I can give. Anymore detailed would obviously be way over your head.
mecher3k 3 years ago
And the source of the energy was...?
The origin of the four forces (plz don't say George Lucas)...?
The catalyst for the great breaking apart and expansion...?
"And this is the most explanation I can give."
Oh, I'm sure you can come up with some more material....just pack the bong again and clear yo' mind.
"Anymore detailed would obviously be way over your head" - Probably, but give it a shot anyway...please...explain it to me, professor.
piranha70 3 years ago
Why the fuck would I said George Lucas for the four forces? Wow you retarded.
I've already said where the energy could of come from many times already. And I've explained where the four fundamental forces came from.
There are plenty of videos out there talking about the big bang, look them up yourself.
The only one who done drugs here is you, that or you were dropped on your head many times.
Your simple mind wants simple answers.
Quite pathetic really.
mecher3k 3 years ago
"The alleged Big Bang has EVERYTHING to do with evolution, freaktard!"
Your statement makes the assumption that it has to be one of two extremes, God or no God. So I ask you, why couldn't it be that God created the universe and made one lifeform that eventually evolved into the different lifeforms that exist now?
Oh, and please try to keep your answer from contradicting that little statement of yours that I put at the top of this comment between that lovely pair of quotation marks.
markermage 3 years ago 2
"So I ask you, why couldn't it be that God created the universe and made one lifeform that eventually evolved into the different lifeforms that exist now?"
Because the Bible says that when the universe (creation) was in its sixth day, man was created. It also says that death did not exist until Adam rebelled; and for evolution to take you from pond scum to cell to fish to ape to man, you have to have couintless generations die off before the arrival of humanity.
piranha70 3 years ago
"Because the Bible says that when the universe (creation) was in its sixth day, man...."
Yeah, uh, who cares what ignorant homicidial savages wrote?
Desertphile 3 years ago
"Because the Bible says..."
So the reason you have for it not being possible for God to have made the universe and life and then let that life evolve is because the Bible says something different. However, wouldn't that argument also work even if "God created the universe and life" was replaced with "the big bang created the universe and abiogenesis created life"?
Hmmm... It would seem that whether the big bang happened doesn't really make any difference as to whether evolution happened.
markermage 3 years ago
So will you claim that your argument only applies to the possibility of there being a God and evolution, take back your statement that the big bang has everything to do with evolution, continue to claim that disproving the big bang disproves evolution, or something else?
markermage 3 years ago
youre awesome dude.. i love your work
wongowonga 3 years ago 2
lol human beings are strange creatures indeed!!
they can't even go to the nearest planet in their own solar system (mars ,the moon being a satellite) but yet speculate on the creation of the universe!the theory of evolution is today's theory of the earth's flatness for it is not logical at all!
tetiraelian 3 years ago
Yea not logical at all....
Hmm should I listen to people who are biology professors from oxford and the such, or idiots like you?
We can observe the universe, call telescopes idiot.
mecher3k 3 years ago
well what u call oxford biology professor and universe observer such as urself are not sure anymore abt the distances between earth and the nearest stars!! ur so called oxford and harvard professors were the ones making "global warming" an irrefutable science fact" which in reality is a scam! so before calling people idiots u better use what u have between ur 2 ears!
peace on earth
tetiraelian 3 years ago
You can't even use actual English...
Global warming is a fact. More then enough evidence to support it.
And not sure about the distance between earth at the nearest stars? Oh really? You don't even know how that is measured probably.
And wtf would that even have to do with evolution or the big bang to begin with? Really if pulling things out of your ass is the best you have, then you must of gotten that "degree" at a degree mill.
If you even could get into any college at all.
mecher3k 3 years ago
guys stop making fun of desertphile. he saw the big bang with his own eyes. he knows his shit ok? plus his hair looks really cool and his voice isn't annoying at all! he doesn't resemble a 40 year old virgin making youtube videos in grandmas basement. "Win" is stamped all over him!!
Squish888 3 years ago
"he saw the big bang with his own eyes."
And you can, too. Ask any astronomer of sheep herder.
Desertphile 3 years ago
loL!
Squish888 3 years ago
This guy is a quack. Get a haircut you hippie freak throwback.
konastephen 3 years ago
Guys like Desertphile really deserve our appreciation. They sacrifice so much in the name of science...
emptylott 3 years ago
...not to mention videography.
konastephen 3 years ago
haha i watched the anti-evolution guys video first...and was just scratching my head ..like "this guy used to believe in evolution??? cause it sounds like he doesnt know fuck all about it!" Thanks for debunking his bullshit, and being humorous at the same time
AddHigga 3 years ago
Now a only now have I realized that the only way to have power is to became a Xenomorph.
jay2tails 3 years ago
Why can't evolution from one animal to another happen quicker?
jay2tails 3 years ago
Animals don't evolve from one to another, like a horse becoming an elephant. Individuals don't evolve. Populations evolve from one generation to the next. Generation time determines rate of change. This is why bacteria or flies adapt so quickly to changes in their environment.
dudev 3 years ago
So that means all organisms can slow became anything. So it's possible for horses to slowly become elephants given lots of generatios and time (millions of year).
jay2tails 3 years ago
"So it's possible for horses to slowly become elephants given lots of generatios and time"
No. But they could become similar to elephants. This is called convergence. Ichthyosaurs were aquatic reptiles which looked like dolphins. Similar environments can lead to similar creatures given enough time.
dudev 3 years ago 2
Are dragons dinosaurs?
jay2tails 3 years ago
Are unicorns horses? First find a dragon or a unicorn, then ask me.
dudev 3 years ago
I have a crude explanation of that. What if unicorns were hunted for the horn in the middle of their foreheads like elephants are being hunted for their tusks then somewhere along the line, before they were all killed off, a mutation occured, probably the lost of the gene responsible for the horn in his face. The could be why pigs don't have tusks. Well as for dragons, hey would it help if I said all dragons probably didn't have wings.
jay2tails 3 years ago
Wild pig tusks are just overgrown teeth. Domesticated pigs still have teeth. Pig farmers have artificially selected against tusks. Pigs can be dangerous, even without sharp tusks.
dudev 3 years ago
So this still can mean the gene(s) for the unicorns' horns could have gotten lost?
jay2tails 3 years ago
Wait, this has to be one of those cut a pasted videoes. I been meaning to bring this up, but evolution can't come from splattered anything. This isn't funny! A creationist wouldn't say some s*** like that.
jay2tails 3 years ago
Doesn't a dentist have to be a doctor in the first place to write prescriptions and have to have a PHD in Dentistry? Not that his creationist bullshit means anything. The funny thing about creationism is that every time they put forth an example of how evolution could not have done something, you find out just how beautiful evolution is and how much it has accomplished on the living earth, and how ignorant they are.
christo930 3 years ago
oh btw destertphile we know the origins of the beatles already, they came from across the pond dontcha know.... :P
hellshade2 3 years ago
just caught this one again desertphile. still love the cattle prod
hellshade2 3 years ago
Are dragons real?
jay2tails 3 years ago
my bad.
jay2tails 3 years ago
What trap? macro-evolution is said to be composed of many series of micro-evolutions. Is it possible for it to go the other way around?
jay2tails 3 years ago
For macro-evolution to work there must be millions and /or billions of years of existence. True are false?
jay2tails 3 years ago
"For macro-evolution to work there must be millions and /or billions of years of existence."
What do you mean by "macro evolution?" Evolution happens in seconds, all the time, non-stop.
Desertphile 3 years ago
I'm sorry if I insulted you, could you help me figure out how it works? Please?
jay2tails 3 years ago
How come you didn't read all of it. Micro-evolution is compatable with creationism, Even though there have been genetic mutations, natural selections, and genetic variations, the beetles still produced beetles
jay2tails 3 years ago
I've probably said this before, Micro-evolution is very real because it has been PROVEN time and again. Macro-evolution leaves to many questions. I mean after hearing about the "Piltdown Man or was it Pitfall Man", don't remember exactly what they called it but surely you can understand the need for such skepticism?
jay2tails 3 years ago
creationists asks questions. well at least I do? and yes we do read about science
jay2tails 3 years ago
Thats mean.
jay2tails 3 years ago
Micro-evolution is true. Macro-evolution is a little hard to swallow. To many holes, literally.
jay2tails 3 years ago
Walking a few blocks is true. But walking across town is just too improbable.
AbbeyNormal 3 years ago
"Walking a few blocks is true. But walking across town is just too improbable."
Walkists only take on faith that street kinds can turn into other street kinds.
Desertphile 3 years ago
Meaning?
jay2tails 3 years ago
If people are going to refute a theory, they must first know what the word theory means. Secondly one must understand the scientific method. Then one must present data(evidence) and a hypothesis that explains the data. If the explanation fits the data, and it must do so always, it is then a "Theory" If you can produce a theory that supports the current evidence, then you have a case. If not, shut the fuck up! Pissing on knowledge for selfish reasons is unethical an unmoral.
falotnek 3 years ago 2
mejc2. Evolution happened. It happens right now. It always happens where there is biological life. Every theory is an explanation. It is not evidence. The evidence is what the research has come up with. Data. The theory explains the evidence and what it means. Also, we all know that you don`t believe in evolution because you don`t want to believe. If you debate a subject you know nothing about, and then deny the evidence refuting your default position, you give away your true reason for belief.
falotnek 3 years ago
He got a degree in theology....pause... which of course is worth shit!
Classic
JJTecumseh87 3 years ago
i have a question
where he come from GOD ??
its an imagination that appear when the human start to think talk walk!! god is nothing but a fucking myth
vadont 3 years ago 2
funny thing about that, everything imaginable can happen to people, we see it everyday, but nothing happens to God.
I have a question
Where did existance come from?
Matter cannot be created nor destoryed. This also mean that anything cannot come from nothing
jay2tails 3 years ago
"Where did existance come from?"
Where did your gods come from?
"This also mean that anything cannot come from nothing"
So, your gods were created by what?
No scientist claims "nothing" ever existed: matter has always existed.
Desertphile 3 years ago
If matter all ready existed then the universe doesn't really have a definite origin. True or False?
jay2tails 3 years ago
that come from comet that have some life in it thats collide whit earth
vadont 3 years ago
Are you talking about Theia?
jay2tails 3 years ago
The CREATIONISM is not a real science
the evolution is the real science
the bible is not real you fanatism retarded
vadont 3 years ago 2
prove it!
jay2tails 3 years ago
God is nothing but an imagination so God don't exist
vadont 3 years ago
Everytime someone mention God, the first thing come to mind is an invisible magical person. How did humans "evolve" from fishs? It is genetically unsound. There has never been a time when an animal gradually became another animal which in turn gradually became another animal. What is to stop me from saying that these prehistoric men are an arrangement of different apes from ugliest to prettiest?
jay2tails 3 years ago
Prehistoric men was something thats look like monkeys
vadont 3 years ago
How are we suppose to know if the bones these archeologists are digging up are human or ape?
jay2tails 3 years ago
they test it to a huge scientific study
vadont 3 years ago
Wow, so what do they do?
jay2tails 3 years ago
so he find the proof that we are Monkey before
thats the evolution of human
vadont 3 years ago
I just thought up an experiment. We should find every spieces of apes on the planet. Just one of each. But here is the sad part, we have to kill them and skin them meatless in order to get an idea of their skeletal structures.
jay2tails 3 years ago
only the stronger race survive
vadont 3 years ago
It took a while to figure where you might be coming from. Are you sugesting that due to the probability of extinction among monkeys that some of the monkeys spieces might have gone extincted?
jay2tails 3 years ago
no the species on monkey who we come from survive to the first time cooler
vadont 3 years ago
Then there is no real harm in going through with this experiment?
jay2tails 3 years ago
but the human race start there
vadont 3 years ago
"How are we suppose to know if the bones these archeologists are digging up are human or ape?"
Humans are apes.
Desertphile 3 years ago
All organisms in the animal and plant kingdoms thrive off of oxygen. Is this true? Does this include apes? How do we make sure these aren't apes? This just it, I see these bones an see an array of monkeys. Sorry.
jay2tails 3 years ago
I suggested this before and I think vadont said it won't work. We should find every spieces of apes on the planet. Just one of each. But here is the sad part, we have to kill them and skin them meatless in order to get an idea of their skeletal structures. So how many matches do you think we'll get.
jay2tails 3 years ago
Good question! That's what makes it so challenging. They're so similar it's almost impossible to tell in some cases. That's what we mean by "transitional". It doesn't mean "that magic number which connects all the dots", it just means one step along the way. Humans and all their recent ancestors are apes, but distinguishing them from one another isn't easy. See Ken Miller's "Only A Theory" for a chart showing disagreement among Creationists as to whether the specimens are human or ape.
AbbeyNormal 3 years ago
Is it on youtube somewhere?
jay2tails 3 years ago
No, it's a book. It's a great read and very accessible to the layperson, and I highly recommend it. There's a review on my channel. Basically, prominent creationists like Gish and Dembski and others in their various books make the claim that these primate skeletons are obviously either ape or human, but the chart shows their conclusions do not match. They disagree more about the nature of the skeletons than they agree.
AbbeyNormal 3 years ago
>>There has never been a time when an animal gradually became another animal which in turn gradually became another animal.
How do you know? As for the bit about the apes, we are all apes. The prehistoric ancestors are arranged from oldest to most recent. Ugly and pretty are subjective, but time is not.
AbbeyNormal 3 years ago 2
What if a very smart person had a big browridge and he died and his bones were dug up. What is some one saw that and said he was an ape? That's scary! So maybe ugly and pretty are subjective, but evolution takes a long time. I heard people digging up "humanoid" bone structures and they were said to be exceedingly tall!
jay2tails 3 years ago
I have no idea what you are saying at all.
Hominid species have been classified using many characteristics, only one of which is skull structure. You might try reading up on human evolution, that would be the first step to understanding it.
No, no human giants have ever been found. You'd have to show me a photo if you claim otherwise.
AbbeyNormal 3 years ago
By the way, how was your sailing trip. Do you take music along with you? Can you hear the wind or is the sound of the wind reduced because you are moving with it? With a modern sailboat and modern technology, how long can you stay out without stopping at a port.
mejc2 3 years ago
Desertphile (5 hours ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Reply
"I have also read many articles and papers written by Evolutionists (sic)."
"Evolutionists" don't exist.
"It is Evolutionism that I deny."
"Evolutionism" does not exist.
Now you are denying yourself because you, my friend are an evolutionist and you accept evolutionism. You deny and ridicule any evidence that might contradict evolutionism but gleefully accept any hint of a suggestion that evolutionism is true. that is an evolutionist.
mejc2 3 years ago
Hey maybe this dentist could fix your roof when you need it.
mobiltec 3 years ago
"Hey maybe this dentist could fix your roof when you need it."
That would be crazy! Everyone knows roofs are fixed by public telephone sanitizers.
Desertphile 3 years ago
GRAVITY!!!!!!
mobiltec 3 years ago
Great fun to watch! Keep going and all the best, DP!
tobitege 3 years ago
i forgot to add have you been drinking lolz cause you looked like youve had a couple ha!
enjoy the desert phil peace
Aqu8Elu8Elon 3 years ago