People don't realize that this is just as crazy as Einstiens thoery of relativity, But as time passed more people where able to test it, hence more acceptence of his theory by more people, even Christians nowadays.... SO just wait Quantum Mechanics will prove to be whacky and true mark my words.
Or if you prefer to start with a sphere (mind inside; matter outside) the analogy could be a klein bottle. One sided like a mobius strip; but without edge. It took Dan Brown to point me at Dean Radin. One hopes the taboo that hangs over valid research such as his is soon confronted.
the chinese believe that flow and change are essential features of nature and that there are patterns in these chages to be observed by men and women. the sage recognizes these patterns and directs his actions according to them, in this way he becomes one with the toa. all matter is energy condensed to a slow vibration, we are the universe experiencing its self subjectively. it is so to say the unconscious part of experience which is doing consciousness just as the space manifests the solid
the chinese believe that flow and change are essential features of nature and that there are patterns in these chnges to be observed by men and women. the sage recognizes these patterns and directs his actions according to them, in this way he becomes one with the toa. all matter is energy condensed to a slow vibration, we are the universe experiencing its self subjectively. it is so to say the unconscious part of experience which is doing consciousness just as the space manifests the solid
@iamdk007 "the chinese believe ... [vague, loose talk]" And that would be all of the Chinese? So, if I call my friend at CERN, who is Chinese, he would believe this? Please, supply your reference.
@NanoFishMan i never said it confirmed it, i was getting at the idea that mind is body just as the void is form. the dualities in life remind us of the inseperableness of everything and that our thoughts and intent ripple out like a wave in the (of the) ocean. i am not an expert but i have looked in to eastern misticism and you can see this kind of symbolism in chinese culture very strongly(chinese culture was just one example, you see it in japanese culture, hinduism and many other cultures).
People that dont believe in ESP have very small brains. A good place to start is Infancy PTSD. A series of genes may be responsible for these anomolies to be more frequent in specific conditions. Also exercises in rebooting Amygdalla response & allowing frontal lobe stimulation to allow for greater success.. Other patients would include Autism & schitzophrenia patients. As this compartmentalization can be reawakened through flashbacks, allowing for more reliable subconscious data acquisition.
@LendMeYourHand "People that dont believe in ESP have very small brains." Ha. You are funny because what you just said is so certifiably stupid. An absolutely great way to get people to believe in ESP is to tell them that there is a conspiracy among scientists to ridicule such studies. This actually has been scientifically proven to work.
amazing way to look at things. I think in 50-100 years we'll look back and be shocked at how stupid we were in seeing the universe. It irritates me that scientists are often so quick to cut this kind of thinking out as bullshit, but ignore the fact that there is something which science can't ignore. I'm sure magnetism seemed as magical and impossible before it was discovered.
My only real question about this is that if there is nothing to it, nothing at all, why is the idea still with us? We've shed more substantial ideas like a geocentric universe and flat Earth, if telekineses is total B.S., why is it still so seriously believed by so many?
There has been an extraordinary amount of discourse about experiments measuring the effect of consciousness on physical systems. Our current modeling of the universe needs to be developed to incorporate a new model of consciousness that emerges from coherent quantum information and so is congruent and may impact causaly with the quantum information of the physical world. (matter)
"collapse of a wave function".. bullshit. Quantum probabilities are just hypothetical abstracts. Nothing "collapses" when its observed. Its just a matter of guessing the wrong probability and not being able to own up to being wrong.
And where did you recieve an education? Because i have a masters degree in mathematics so when you make claims like this is nonsense you make yourself look like an ignorant fool. Shut your mouth untill you are educated enough to speak on such things.
Well that master's degree of yours obviously can't keep you from from sounding like bad fortune tellers when you're wrong and you just say "the probability collapsed when you looked at it".. How wonderful to know that even the educated aren't immune to the effects of superstition.
Just because a dynamic engine uses energy as our brains do, it doesn't mean the mental output of our physical brains can directly interact with that matter outside of any natural force that our brains have no control over anyways.
Xerock, why are you denying the evidence? It's been shown in Princeton labs that there is a connection between intention and REG machines. This IS science.
This is not hocus pocus. If you don't want to believe something just say so. Don't say the evidence is wrong because you want it to be wrong.
The link between random numbers appearing slightly less random (most likely out of common everyday apophenia - because Radin has never published what defines a series of random numbers to be "less random") and the conjectural notion of "mental waves" is poor correlation at best (ie not even fucking close to causation).
Counterfeit detector pens may be based on science, but it doesn't make it work. All Dean Radin was make an electronic Ouija board.
The analogy of mind and matter being 2 sides of a mobius strip seems pretty far-fetched, unless we think of the mobius strip as being made of energy. If we see thought and matter as being forms of energy that can interact with each other, then it seems more likely they can effect each other.
Matter is energy and vice versa. Our consciousness is a sea of electrical signals in mass of fat and water known as the brain, I find that concept just fascinating in itself.
Although I don't believe in all manner of parapsychology I do think there are things about the consciousness which science has yet to discover. The only reason why these phenomena are called "Para" (meaning "beyond")-normal is because we are unaware of them due to their aberrance- not it being "mystical" mumbo jumbo.
I actually see the brain as the radio and consciousness as the music playing through the radio. We can analyze the brain down to neurons of tissue and electrical charges, but we can't find consciouness within all those little pieces. We can analyze the pitch, rhythm, and loudness of the music, but it the real meaning of it comes down to one consciousness expressing itself and another perceiving this expression.
I used to feel that way too, and to an extent I think it's a reasonable assumption. The difference is, consciousness, unlike our other 5 senses, is an experience all its own.
Every sense has a delay due to nerves reacting to stimuli and the brain translating this stimuli for us, but consciousness is ever-present and instantaneous. This leads be to believe that consciousness might not be housed solely in the brain, but is within the (very weak) electromagnetic field that the brain generates.
This whole series of videos is excellent! This man is an very good speaker and able to put ideas across so that they are understandable and appeal to scientists and lay persons alike.
I see all this as being equivalent to the alchemist of the 15th and 16th century they new that things happen but never really knew why. A expect that within 50 to 100 years we'd have a better understanding and put this new science to good use.
Actually, couldn't you say that Philosophy is the "what if" question that you are speaking of? "What if" does not arise in an area where something is already known. It only arises when you bump up against something that is unknown. So if you look at it in that light, Philosophy and Science are more tightly coupled then we might think, and probably should be. With Philosophy, you make a conjecture, and with Science, you figure out if your conjecture is true or not.
Listen, kid. :) You don't prove scientific theories, you provide evidence.
I've studied classical physics back in the day; but quantum mechanics is going mainstream now and for very good reasons. A lot of older physicians are searching for more flexible models, since classical mechanics is rather numb in it's approach. :)
Describe the structure of a 4th dimention to us and we can continue our discussion. :)
As long as there is a fire in the minds of men, there will be progress; exponential growth nullifies stagnation it would seem. As long as there is no deflation, like is about to occur in the US before the end of the year, the mind will keep on generating ideas.
P.S. If you're still in the dollar, you might want to get out; refer to this comment in 2.5 months time and I can educate you on the moral of 'ignorance is bliss'.
Philosophy got us where we are in present day -- spacefaring species. Like Mr. Radin said: all ideas are wacko, until you get a lot of traction, or if you provide solid evidence.
If it wasn't for these wacko ideas, you people would be sitting on your knee-pads, praying with the pope to an imaginary deity.
In 20 years time, I'll be writing books about you people; how human egos in all of the history of Homo Sapiens, Sapiens were the catalyst of stagnation, not progress.
Exactly. We must remember that the one thing that Scientists and Priests/Bishops have in common is that they are both human beings, and have the same faults and failings as the rest of us, and each other. So scientists are very intelligent people, but they are not immune to being deluded by others and by society and everything else. I have no proof of this personally, but I'm very secure in saying that there are probably numerous scientists who have discovered something, and never uttered a word
just wondering, all the coven arcane symbolism in "magick" is a way to project the same intention towards a same goal in a coherent form? (ie. adding "push" as Dean has put it)
"just wondering, all the coven arcane symbolism in "magick" is a way to project the same intention towards a same goal in a coherent form? (ie. adding "push" as Dean has put it)"
Absolutely! Spot on! That is why when people do "magick", they use a ritual to help them to focus on what the goal is. A lot of ancient tribes and the Egyptians used ritualistic "magick" and such to do things supernatural, and they must have worked, because they thrived fantastically, the Egyptians especially.
so true toafn...1'st the truth is ridiculed...2nd the truth is fiercly opposed...3rd it becomes self evident...when will science take what you said and my analogy and apply it to science....were so primitive.. :(
he uses RNG's based on noise from zener diodes, and based on photons passing through a half silvered mirror, a quantum optical event. also the outputs are tested beforehand for any prdicabilty. I'm a skeptic myself but i have to say this dude is pretty thorough.
He talks not about random number generator in computers, he talkas about it in your mind, when you try to generate any random number like I just generated 5. It was just example he used, to illustrate mind work.
This can also explain the pick three lottery numbers in NY on Sept 11th 2002 being 911. It does not necessarily have to be chance or coincidence
toobsucker 3 months ago
People don't realize that this is just as crazy as Einstiens thoery of relativity, But as time passed more people where able to test it, hence more acceptence of his theory by more people, even Christians nowadays.... SO just wait Quantum Mechanics will prove to be whacky and true mark my words.
AntiCreationism 4 months ago in playlist Quantum Physics - Anti Gravity - Free Energy
Or if you prefer to start with a sphere (mind inside; matter outside) the analogy could be a klein bottle. One sided like a mobius strip; but without edge. It took Dan Brown to point me at Dean Radin. One hopes the taboo that hangs over valid research such as his is soon confronted.
kleinbottled79 8 months ago
"Imagine that intention has a wavelike structure." Can you see the difference between this garbage and real quantum science?
NanoFishMan 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the chinese believe that flow and change are essential features of nature and that there are patterns in these chages to be observed by men and women. the sage recognizes these patterns and directs his actions according to them, in this way he becomes one with the toa. all matter is energy condensed to a slow vibration, we are the universe experiencing its self subjectively. it is so to say the unconscious part of experience which is doing consciousness just as the space manifests the solid
iamdk007 10 months ago
the chinese believe that flow and change are essential features of nature and that there are patterns in these chnges to be observed by men and women. the sage recognizes these patterns and directs his actions according to them, in this way he becomes one with the toa. all matter is energy condensed to a slow vibration, we are the universe experiencing its self subjectively. it is so to say the unconscious part of experience which is doing consciousness just as the space manifests the solid
iamdk007 10 months ago
@iamdk007 "the chinese believe ... [vague, loose talk]" And that would be all of the Chinese? So, if I call my friend at CERN, who is Chinese, he would believe this? Please, supply your reference.
NanoFishMan 10 months ago
@NanoFishMan well i meant Chinese thought, philosophy and culture, you dont have to be a dick about it.
iamdk007 10 months ago
@iamdk007 So, you are an expert on Chinese thought, philosophy and culture? How does what you wrote confirm Radin's claims, again?
NanoFishMan 9 months ago
@NanoFishMan i never said it confirmed it, i was getting at the idea that mind is body just as the void is form. the dualities in life remind us of the inseperableness of everything and that our thoughts and intent ripple out like a wave in the (of the) ocean. i am not an expert but i have looked in to eastern misticism and you can see this kind of symbolism in chinese culture very strongly(chinese culture was just one example, you see it in japanese culture, hinduism and many other cultures).
iamdk007 8 months ago
People that dont believe in ESP have very small brains. A good place to start is Infancy PTSD. A series of genes may be responsible for these anomolies to be more frequent in specific conditions. Also exercises in rebooting Amygdalla response & allowing frontal lobe stimulation to allow for greater success.. Other patients would include Autism & schitzophrenia patients. As this compartmentalization can be reawakened through flashbacks, allowing for more reliable subconscious data acquisition.
LendMeYourHand 1 year ago
@LendMeYourHand "People that dont believe in ESP have very small brains." Ha. You are funny because what you just said is so certifiably stupid. An absolutely great way to get people to believe in ESP is to tell them that there is a conspiracy among scientists to ridicule such studies. This actually has been scientifically proven to work.
NanoFishMan 10 months ago
@NanoFishMan it does exist, it's a sports tv network.
ogfunk187 9 months ago
an authentic meditation practice will confirm what Dean Radin says....
TigerTurban 1 year ago
type as one word Meditation-is-easy intoa browser window..and May the Force Be With You, my y9ung padawan...
TigerTurban 1 year ago
comment:
TigerTurban 1 year ago
Someday... this will help me learn how to use the Force.
5aaron23 1 year ago
amazing way to look at things. I think in 50-100 years we'll look back and be shocked at how stupid we were in seeing the universe. It irritates me that scientists are often so quick to cut this kind of thinking out as bullshit, but ignore the fact that there is something which science can't ignore. I'm sure magnetism seemed as magical and impossible before it was discovered.
leigh2490 1 year ago
nobel prize should go to the guy who discovered uncertainty principle
Zee96969696 1 year ago
Awesome! Great insight.
ronmawla 2 years ago
My only real question about this is that if there is nothing to it, nothing at all, why is the idea still with us? We've shed more substantial ideas like a geocentric universe and flat Earth, if telekineses is total B.S., why is it still so seriously believed by so many?
ShaulTalmeed 2 years ago
There has been an extraordinary amount of discourse about experiments measuring the effect of consciousness on physical systems. Our current modeling of the universe needs to be developed to incorporate a new model of consciousness that emerges from coherent quantum information and so is congruent and may impact causaly with the quantum information of the physical world. (matter)
metaRising 2 years ago
"collapse of a wave function".. bullshit. Quantum probabilities are just hypothetical abstracts. Nothing "collapses" when its observed. Its just a matter of guessing the wrong probability and not being able to own up to being wrong.
Xerock 2 years ago
@Xerock
And where did you recieve an education? Because i have a masters degree in mathematics so when you make claims like this is nonsense you make yourself look like an ignorant fool. Shut your mouth untill you are educated enough to speak on such things.
Blazen1212 2 years ago
@Blazen1212
Well that master's degree of yours obviously can't keep you from from sounding like bad fortune tellers when you're wrong and you just say "the probability collapsed when you looked at it".. How wonderful to know that even the educated aren't immune to the effects of superstition.
Xerock 1 year ago
@Xerock LOL!
PineAppleEx420 1 year ago
Well spoken. Complete nonsense, but well spoken.
Just because a dynamic engine uses energy as our brains do, it doesn't mean the mental output of our physical brains can directly interact with that matter outside of any natural force that our brains have no control over anyways.
Xerock 2 years ago
Xerock, why are you denying the evidence? It's been shown in Princeton labs that there is a connection between intention and REG machines. This IS science.
This is not hocus pocus. If you don't want to believe something just say so. Don't say the evidence is wrong because you want it to be wrong.
mayaclay 2 years ago 4
No. This is pseudo-science.
The link between random numbers appearing slightly less random (most likely out of common everyday apophenia - because Radin has never published what defines a series of random numbers to be "less random") and the conjectural notion of "mental waves" is poor correlation at best (ie not even fucking close to causation).
Counterfeit detector pens may be based on science, but it doesn't make it work. All Dean Radin was make an electronic Ouija board.
Xerock 2 years ago
"All Dean Radin was make an electronic Ouija board." Ungrammatical / meaningless sentence. Conclusion: You are talking crappy babble.
ilkinond 2 years ago
All Dean Radin DID was make an electronic Ouija board.
Happy now, douchebag? I hope your kids get eaten by some pedophile.
Xerock 2 years ago
And I hope yours don't learn their English from you. Best, yet, that you have no progeny whatsoever.
Stupid fucking cocksucker
ilkinond 2 years ago
Ah ha ha! Agreed.
SonofBrunhilde 2 years ago
check my latest presentation, I am looking for the truth as well so please post some negative comments that can move me forward...
mpeniak 2 years ago
Can someone please tell me what documentaries I can find Dean Radin in? I saw one long time ago but forgot the name...
Thanks... will be much appreciated
justsayingno 2 years ago
"Intention is a wave-like structure"
What the hell is this crap?
For anyone bamboozled by this guy's ramblings please go to QQMCknRDUVg (David Albert, Ph.D on Quantum Physics)
mirrusca 2 years ago
The analogy of mind and matter being 2 sides of a mobius strip seems pretty far-fetched, unless we think of the mobius strip as being made of energy. If we see thought and matter as being forms of energy that can interact with each other, then it seems more likely they can effect each other.
Persephonetoo 3 years ago
Matter is energy and vice versa. Our consciousness is a sea of electrical signals in mass of fat and water known as the brain, I find that concept just fascinating in itself.
Although I don't believe in all manner of parapsychology I do think there are things about the consciousness which science has yet to discover. The only reason why these phenomena are called "Para" (meaning "beyond")-normal is because we are unaware of them due to their aberrance- not it being "mystical" mumbo jumbo.
IndigoR 2 years ago
I actually see the brain as the radio and consciousness as the music playing through the radio. We can analyze the brain down to neurons of tissue and electrical charges, but we can't find consciouness within all those little pieces. We can analyze the pitch, rhythm, and loudness of the music, but it the real meaning of it comes down to one consciousness expressing itself and another perceiving this expression.
Persephonetoo 2 years ago
I used to feel that way too, and to an extent I think it's a reasonable assumption. The difference is, consciousness, unlike our other 5 senses, is an experience all its own.
Every sense has a delay due to nerves reacting to stimuli and the brain translating this stimuli for us, but consciousness is ever-present and instantaneous. This leads be to believe that consciousness might not be housed solely in the brain, but is within the (very weak) electromagnetic field that the brain generates.
IndigoR 2 years ago
This whole series of videos is excellent! This man is an very good speaker and able to put ideas across so that they are understandable and appeal to scientists and lay persons alike.
alchemistra 3 years ago 5
He's amazing!
Clear and precise...
Thanks for sharing!
corbier111 3 years ago 4
I see all this as being equivalent to the alchemist of the 15th and 16th century they new that things happen but never really knew why. A expect that within 50 to 100 years we'd have a better understanding and put this new science to good use.
ffunit 3 years ago 3
Actually, couldn't you say that Philosophy is the "what if" question that you are speaking of? "What if" does not arise in an area where something is already known. It only arises when you bump up against something that is unknown. So if you look at it in that light, Philosophy and Science are more tightly coupled then we might think, and probably should be. With Philosophy, you make a conjecture, and with Science, you figure out if your conjecture is true or not.
eatthatmeatball 3 years ago 2
Listen, kid. :) You don't prove scientific theories, you provide evidence.
I've studied classical physics back in the day; but quantum mechanics is going mainstream now and for very good reasons. A lot of older physicians are searching for more flexible models, since classical mechanics is rather numb in it's approach. :)
Describe the structure of a 4th dimention to us and we can continue our discussion. :)
Edward1589 3 years ago
As long as there is a fire in the minds of men, there will be progress; exponential growth nullifies stagnation it would seem. As long as there is no deflation, like is about to occur in the US before the end of the year, the mind will keep on generating ideas.
P.S. If you're still in the dollar, you might want to get out; refer to this comment in 2.5 months time and I can educate you on the moral of 'ignorance is bliss'.
Good day, all.
Edward1589 3 years ago
Philosophy got us where we are in present day -- spacefaring species. Like Mr. Radin said: all ideas are wacko, until you get a lot of traction, or if you provide solid evidence.
If it wasn't for these wacko ideas, you people would be sitting on your knee-pads, praying with the pope to an imaginary deity.
In 20 years time, I'll be writing books about you people; how human egos in all of the history of Homo Sapiens, Sapiens were the catalyst of stagnation, not progress.
Edward1589 3 years ago
Fear of change?
TOAFN 3 years ago
Exactly. We must remember that the one thing that Scientists and Priests/Bishops have in common is that they are both human beings, and have the same faults and failings as the rest of us, and each other. So scientists are very intelligent people, but they are not immune to being deluded by others and by society and everything else. I have no proof of this personally, but I'm very secure in saying that there are probably numerous scientists who have discovered something, and never uttered a word
eatthatmeatball 3 years ago
just wondering, all the coven arcane symbolism in "magick" is a way to project the same intention towards a same goal in a coherent form? (ie. adding "push" as Dean has put it)
LarvaMaster 3 years ago
"just wondering, all the coven arcane symbolism in "magick" is a way to project the same intention towards a same goal in a coherent form? (ie. adding "push" as Dean has put it)"
Absolutely! Spot on! That is why when people do "magick", they use a ritual to help them to focus on what the goal is. A lot of ancient tribes and the Egyptians used ritualistic "magick" and such to do things supernatural, and they must have worked, because they thrived fantastically, the Egyptians especially.
eatthatmeatball 3 years ago 2
Well spoken. Excellent!
TOAFN 3 years ago
You're making an assumption without investigating the subject seriously. Who knows it's JUST physical? You?
Go check out the Field & The intention experiment. Excellent books.
Every fact of science was once Damned.
Every invention was considered impossible.
Every discovery was a nervous shock to some orthodoxy.
TOAFN 3 years ago
so true toafn...1'st the truth is ridiculed...2nd the truth is fiercly opposed...3rd it becomes self evident...when will science take what you said and my analogy and apply it to science....were so primitive.. :(
Gianter1 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Smells like bullshit, random computer number generators usually have deviations due to the nature of the algorythm that produces them.
AbedeuS 4 years ago
he uses RNG's based on noise from zener diodes, and based on photons passing through a half silvered mirror, a quantum optical event. also the outputs are tested beforehand for any prdicabilty. I'm a skeptic myself but i have to say this dude is pretty thorough.
trayman113 3 years ago 10
He talks not about random number generator in computers, he talkas about it in your mind, when you try to generate any random number like I just generated 5. It was just example he used, to illustrate mind work.
hizard 3 years ago
Uuuuse the Force, Luke!
digitalwaylander 4 years ago 4
Great video. Thanks for putting them up :)
solboard 4 years ago 4
Which means we all have to think or intend our worldleaders to truth or dust, right? :)
Happy new year!
TOAFN 4 years ago 2