Artificial Intelligence: Thinking Big - KQED QUEST

[PoorMansMind]

5:17 that's exactly how i found this video. :D

[97448able]

I'm located in San Luis Obispo, California (moving soon). It could be age related (been there, done that); however, I have never been in a community with such a lack of Cultural Identity and originality. Other than some Robotics, there really is no need for spending: time, resources, and money on Artificial Intelligence...just come here.

Gurdjief's notion that the vast majority of humanity is nothing more than unconscious sleep walking "machines" is obvious here. The Bible etc, echo this notion.

[wiseyeffect]

They are not showing the true progress that has been made. The robotic they have now are far superior than Terminator but as stated from another user "this isn't AI". Look into "Watson" if your looking for AI.

[benjamincrouzier]

Artificial intelligence has nothing to do with robots. If you have a question-answering system that passes the Turing test (ie, make you believe that you are chatting with a human), I would be considered intelligent, yet it has no mechanical arms.

[chroniclerofthe70s]

@benjamincrouzier I believe you are describing apparent intelligence not conscious awareness intelligence. Even if an AI system passed the Turing test, it wouldn't confirm if the AI system understood the communication exchange in the way a conscious human might. For instance, a human can distinguish a joke from a serious statement by it's context relative to common knowledge and experiences. An AI which could get the joke would be intelligent with respect to the Turing test.

[97448able]

Absolutely fascinating, food for thought. Especially the ability to endow these machines with "Extra" senses humans don't have, see: 03:35 Laser Scanner etc.

Achieve a high enough "sampling rate" these machines will eventually mimic (ape) humans.

Than again Artificial Intelligence has already been perfected...just look around, you are surrounded by clones: "monkey see, monkey do, lookey me, lookey you". Is it live;or, is it memorex? Same old shit, different day.

[chroniclerofthe70s]

@97448able The K supercomputer has immense parellel processing power and yet it probably couldn't understand a human joke. The researcher is assumming the system is learning like a living system. The AI system might be learning patterns not recognized by the average human. In my opinion, a truly intelligent AI will be composed synthetic materials which mimic the biochemical and other physical processes of living systems.

[97448able]

@chroniclerofthe70s Thank you food for thought. I thought the NSA had the largest, most, powerful supercomputer? oh well, I'm learning.

I'm a Student of Sanskrit and have read several of those articles pertaining to using Sanskrit as a model for AI and Computational Linguistics. True Panini's Grammar system might require a supercomputer for proper use...it is that monumental! However, for AI I'm quite skeptical would require quite a leap of faith...I will remain open to that.

[97448able]

@97448able While it is true that Sanskrit Grammar is highly analytical, precise, and scientific, The Sanskrit language itself is not, and is quite open to interpretation. Panini's Grammar the Ashtadhyayi is cited by some as a model for AI (Rick Briggs from NASA 1985!) the rules themselves, a complex metalanguage are great for analysis, but don't convey much in the way of meaning. These articles are great for learning about Sanskrit, but not AI. As you say: "AI lies in the hardware.

[jesushit]

At 9:08 now that's AI... haha

[WindowsAndMacintosh]

I hate that journalest accent! 

[sterlthepearl1000]

Well made film. To see an award winning documentry visit 180movie.com

[gentlemanREX]

k, this is cool, but when can we expect Geth?

[TwistedLemniscate]

"with AI the intelligence lies less in the hardware and more in the software"

not if you ever wish to reach the "singularity"

[chroniclerofthe70s]

@TwistedLemniscate The emergence of intelligence of living systems is based on intrinsic combinatorial nature of intrinsic nature of interacting biomolecular processes with structure, densities, charge distributions, etc. In my opinion, AI lies in the hardware. A human trying to guess every possible scenario in code is not likely to achieve intelligence. Nature evolved intelligence with bio-organic molecules. Humans could also achieve this using design molecules.

[NewAgeDirector]

Great video keep up the good work.

[AbortedFetus]

HERE IS YOUR STAPLER. USE IT WISELY.

[Jackle512]

okay so this is what you call "THINKING BIG" ? ...!...

[Standuble]

@brelan001 I think it would depend how the creators design their minds to think. If it programmes the machine to have a logical mind, then the machine will try to understand faith and a connection to a higher power in a way which would resemble critical thinking e.g. if we assume religious belief or faith is merely a series of pre-conceptions on the nature of existence then what happens if we assume its base assumptions to not be true?

The machines may also end up worshipping humanity.

[ingars17]

robot, get me a sammich

[purtek6767]

Major breakthrough is Hierachical Temporal Memory, which is bassically reverse engineering the neo cortex, check out Jeff Hawkins lecture /watch?v=oozFn2d45tg

[tepadno]

maybe that's the way to teach a computer. give it 3 patterns + series of photos. it the shape of a giraffe isn't accurate(it's bending) then check other characteristics(size, color, height). if most important of them are correct accept as giraffe. if not save as a new animal. if ai recognizes camel as a giraffe teach it the new animal and save distinctive characteristics it has. put similar-looking animals into one group and use funnel to choose the correct one.

[tepadno]

maybe that's obvious but... a child learn by associating previous experience with the new ones. it sees a dog, then a horse(large dog for it), then a giraffe(large horse). it differentiates particular animals by a countable number of characteristic features as color, shape, size of head, legs etc. it then groups them into walking animals, crawling animals, trees, humans etc.

[Slingzen]

it cool, master cheif doesnt need cortana for another 500 years or so, we can wait.

[KaxiLaxi]

Thank you come again! 08:06

[peaceonearth347]

There is a game on AI that is just amazing. It's called the endless ocean (I think) go play it

[alexrusland]

BS!!!!! You don't need body to be intelligent.... A specially if you r computer. 

[bhuvansimpy007]

at 3.22, an intelligent blond :)

[MachineFight]

At 4:48 I thought it was going to use the PC. :D

[TheTyCave]

When he turned the power off at the end, the robot sounded so sad!

[utubesucksheha]

they should build one that can give you a hand job

[TheNoodlyAppendage]

@utubesucksheha except the first time you forget to apply security updates, it becomes infected with the Lorena Bobbit Virus

[utubesucksheha]

@TheNoodlyAppendage lol

[FeralArtist]

Apocalypse.

[123e3]

Geth? Anyone?

[FeralArtist]

@123e3 Yep haha

[dancingwithcalvin]

Fuck yeah. And the good thing is, the slavery wouldn't be immoral.

[FeralArtist]

@dancingwithcalvin Actually it would.

[dancingwithcalvin]

@FeralArtist

No it wouldnt. They are not conscious. If its immoral then so is using a smart phone with out paying the phone.

[FeralArtist]

@dancingwithcalvin Actually true AI is conscious. If you mean VI then sure. Make them mine pathetic metals for weeks at a time. But AI would eradicate us when it sees us as inferior or being misused.

[dancingwithcalvin]

@FeralArtist

Well between you and me are there any robots that aware of themselves to sence unethical use?

[FeralArtist]

@dancingwithcalvin Ethics is an invention, not a hardened concept. Right and wrong really have no meaning, just whatever meaning people believe it to have. Also, nobody has created a true AI yet.

[freyajean]

4:45 anti maximum overdrive

[freyajean]

0:45 glad you are using it for physical modifications for lost limbs

[kikkin55]

mutated forhead O_O 3:19

[KAGE7486]

@kikkin55 wow lol

[Mezcal2008]

I think Artificial intelligence would be next, then once humans has that extra help, then next thing would be human brain upgrades, unlocking the truth power of the human brain and beyond, human vision upgraded to see in all colors and depths, super hearing senses, super sense of smell, color skin would be able to change colors, goodbye to the old days when you used to get sick, clean body no virus or infections, you would never get old, and die only when desired, immortality would be possible.

[SethGibbs]

One of the issues with robots is that they often don't have binocular vision - depth perception. If it compares both images to each other, it may be able to realize that a similar colored object is the same object With the inclusion of that, a computer can guess the form of a 3d object. Once that occurs, it could figure out the overall distance between two points.

Although a lot of AI programming has to do with object recognition, it should also concern the build of the robot.

[the81stviewer]

Why do they want AI so bad? Once computers are smarter, stronger, and faster than us what will happen will be the same as what happened when Humans outevolved the previous "models". We will die out, and they will conquer the earth. It's evolution. The better and smarter species lives, the more stupid and less able one dies out having their resources outcompeted and their abilities crushed by the competition.

[Psychosmurf547]

@the81stviewer Not unless you program the AI to align its interests with those of humans.

[PaulErly]

@the81stviewer You watch too many movies.

[FutebolFanatico001]

@the81stviewer many people don't understand that you may be right. if we give robots the equal or greater intelligent processing capabilities of the human brain, they may very well rule over our own species. think about it, the only reason humans dominate is because of their intelligence. now imagine having an even more intelligent "being" that is not an organic life form. no this stuff is not only possible in movies. once ai comes along, emotion will be next, posing a serious threat.

[mrhnm]

An Artifial Intelligence will be able to improve itself and as it does it will get better at improving itself. An AI that is just as smart as us is the begining after a while an AI will be way more intelligent than us.

[MrXStark]

at 00:57 what language is that?

[ScottSearle]

Here's your stapler.

Use it wisely. [WTH is that, a warning?]

[Underdogpiano]

Cyberdyne much?

Thumbs up if you know what i mean:P

[IIIIandrew]

wanna see real ai clever bot

[DoubleMGames]

I created a simluated emotion program that was based on variables, each word siad would raise certain variables in the correct emotion category, now if only if honda could give me an asimo so i an test it that would be great.

[LordEmilous]

pause carefuly near 5:18 XD

[behnamasid]

@LordEmilous ???

[LordEmilous]

@behnamasid what google has to offer once she starts typing... hard to catch it... nothing special ^^

[sonya28233]

MAGNIFIQUE le progre MAGNIFIQUE au fond de moi meme il remplacera jamais l etre HUMAIN mais il peut aider beaucoup thankyou

[vowthorn]

they should just speak to Adobe to ask if they can buy some of Photoshop's image tools. I mean magic wand does what they trying to do

[SASNIGHTCRAWLER]

they are doing it all wrong, its like asking your car to paint a picture, and the software is no good. You need to forget about chips and rubbish like that, you need to totaly change how systems for storing and processing information are made and operate. But even when you do that, you need to create a body that it able to do everything a human can do. But then you will find it takes many years for it to learn, just like we do. There are no short cuts, only lifeless fakes.

[Totallyneutral]

@SASNIGHTCRAWLER you should read up on genetic algorithms.

[SASNIGHTCRAWLER]

@Totallyneutral biological computers are the next step, and then we will create them in our own image, because we are nothing only chemical compositions..everything on the planet is made up of the same stuff. It needs a chemical and nurological memory system, not unlike our own, thats how a computer will learn, but then where do you draw the line, because you have just created life, and that life has rights, more so when it can think like you and i, you can stick those old programs in the bin :)

[ewankobaga]

Mr bean at 8:04 hehehehe

[ewankobaga]

mr bean at 8:04 hehehehe

[madichelp0]

What really bothers me is that a lot of people are afraid that the computers will take over mans place. However the problem does not lay in in the computers taking over but rather in people being afraid of it. I mean, if we humans aren't good enough, then why should we still take up resources? I have no problem with the thought that in 1000 years, we may have given over to the robots, as they are just as much a creation of us as our biological children.

[grozmo1]

It's one thing to recognize a cup (various shapes/sizes) and another to 'understand' the purpose of a cup, determine other objects which could be used for the same purpose (eg A bowl is able to hold liquid) and even further be able to manipulate an unrelated object for the same purpose (eg Fold a leaf a certain way and it is able to hold liquid too).

Its more about purpose and intent than specific objects. A truly intelligent robot could see the world in this way - like Macguyver! haha

[astroboomboy]

@grozmo1 Computational linguistics is actually trying to do exactly what you are proposing. By using linguistics insights in syntax, morphology, semantics, and pragmatics, we are now trying to program computers to recognize words/objects and then create links to other objects. So the program creates these upper structures, like hollow thing, and then everything that is hollow falls under that category. It's a really interesting and exiting field, the problem is there is no funding...

[audiotrax2000]

Where is my stapler?  Where is the red stapler? ZAPPP!

[0R2R0]

What if INSTEAD of having Everything stored on the Robot Have it stored In A Big Server.Less Work more Realism We dont want robots With HUGE humps on there back do we.

[PinkProgram]

Why not add this to a neural tissue system? Have robots print their own brain tissue from internal bioreactors to build up networks of tissue around the processors to reinforce connections.

[dtstrain]

Here is your stapler. Use it wisely.

[situlo]

@dtstrain that reminds me of this old lady on halloween that gave me a condom when i was trick or treating and then said use it wisely lol

[XanaduZune]

Virtually everyone doing artificial intelligence research is side-stepping the real issue, which is making software that can really understand things and come up with original decisions and original solutions, not just stupidly follow instructions. Making a robotic arm grasp objects and making software recognize shapes, those are not central to real intelligence. If anyone is working on real intelligence in software, then they are keeping it a secret.

[alphakristjan]

"Here is your stapler , use it wisely " lol ...interesting video . The Woman is indeed a Mormon ... i mean a moron .

[LaBellaa1984]

yeah what is so ffn difficult at making a robothand??? they can make anything!

[DominoChild]

Watching this video, i now understand how advanced mathmatics such as algebra, is used in real life.

[eyhexs]

1:59 the sexual tension between machine and human is palpable

:D

[dollerklause]

that dude is himself a robot, he talks like that robot voice.

[onetocome]

You can't reward a machine, it doesn't feel.

[megadeus17]

@onetocome Wrong. Many learning algorithms may be interpreted in terms of reward/punishment.

[onetocome]

@megadeus17 This is why I can't debate with you people. How can you say that. There is no learning nothing, no one is learning or feelings. Who is it that you are rewarding. A computer, a piece of metal. I really don't understand how you think.

[googoo120]

@onetocome how it works is simple, when the robot does something good it marks that occasion with a high number(its reward). Its instructed to try and get the highest possiable rewards so it does things which it thinks will get higher numbers.

[onetocome]

@googoo120 I know how it works, that's not the point. The robot doesn't know that is doing something good, so the reward is just a another number with a different value store somewhere in the hardware. All AI programs/hardware are exactly the same, they all work the same, the problem is that the machine does not learn, you can say it's learning, but in reality it's not, it's just a dead piece of metal.

[harry3life]

@onetocome

people are machines too. You are obviously stuck up on that we are something special, I bet you think a soul exists too...

[onetocome]

@harry3life We are not machines, and yes you are right, I am special, very special, super special. You are too, if only you got your head out of your ass you would realize how special you are. Machines don't feel, period. When you show me a machine that can feel, then I'll stop believing that I'm special. I don't know if souls exists, but I know for sure that machines can't feel, let alone think, and that is a fact. And if something is a fact now, it will be a fact for ever.

[harry3life]

@onetocome

tell me the definition of feeling, machines can be programmed to feel just like we are made that way.

[onetocome]

@harry3life If I where you, I would not repeat what you just said, ppl will think that you are crazy. Feelings, like taste can only be compare to other things, there are no defenitions, oh, by the way, that is the job of scientist, well, guess what, they have no defenitions, because they don't know what the hell feelings are. Go tell a scientist that machines can feel, and see what they say. By the way, how old are you!

[onetocome]

@megadeus17 There is no interpreter, the machine doesn't know anything, it doesn't know it's being rewarded, it's dead, it's like talking to a dead person, they don't hear you.

[ilovehd831]

Hmm... While I'm gratefiul that people are doing research like this, I'm not sure this is the correct approach to an intelligence machine / well performing robot.

[eswyatt]

The whole computer metaphor is the wrong approach. They should be working on neural nets instead of Turing-type computer processing.

[NoogLeader]

This is the wrong way to make a machine intelligent. You have to make them adaptable. IT doesn't need to recognize an object by name. IT just needs to be aware of the object and to learn that it truly exist. Adaptability is needed to be figured out.

[2TESLACOIL]

90% of the work required to make a robot smart is just getting the right information into its brain. Once it understands whats going on from this input making good decisions is a piece of cake. A chess computer whoops yer butt because it can see the world as well as you can

[franciellychicoski]

Liked so much ,but hhow can i download this video? i heard someone say that youtube canceled the link we used to download..is that true?

[Zillahtech]

A lot of people have a hard time with empathy, love, guilt, wishes, fantasy and so on, i don´t think any computer will be able to learn these things. It would probably be great for killing and stuff tho.

[MackTuesday]

8:33 looks like a cellular automaton.

[rsherfan]

6:00 they are wasting their time using that method. the new method is HTM - Jeff Hawkins talks about this on TED and Youtube. Showing the computer photo after photo after photo will not help it see giraffes.

[amrosik]

better methode, find a way how you can translate human brain structures to implement them, because programming a robot is like educate him, but you can not educate a robot. forget this concept, it wont work. began with brain and neuroscience and then go on with robotics, not vice versa.

[Juefawn]

@amrosik The brain is a learning device?

[avedic]

what's pretty interesting...this video seems very mid 90s....i bet it was filmed then. artificial intelligence has advanced waaay beyond this already. that, and it's exponential.

[blaskkaffe]

no its not from the mid 90's, they have lcd monitors and googles new logo. so i guess its form somewhere between 2005 and 2008

[avedic]

lol...good point. i made that comment early in the video before i saw all that. actually, given that it is a recent video...they sure picked a shitty robot designer to interview. there are plenty of design firms producing much more sophisticated robots than one that clumsily grasps for cups. i used something like that in highschool. oh well. either way...this is growing exponentially. exciting times we live in for sure.

[kennegun]

God gave us rain and no umbrella. We invented the umbrella.

Russian proverb: Pray to GOd, but row to shore.

I say, since you can't do both at the same time, I'll stick to rowing.

[braydenbeautiful]

@6767Kdog

Prove it.

[PinkProgram]

Why wait for God? Just get smarter.

[GeneticRealityFilms]

@6767Kdog Shut the fuck up

[6767Kdog]

Ok, two things. First, if anyone dare calls english or americans dirty ass fuckin basturdly retarts one more time then I am going to hack that person. Second, an artificial intelligence CAN indeed think very advancely but would never want world domination or any of that crap. I have done test on some intelligence of robots and it is easy. Reduce the size it takes to take up 862 gigs and do some randomizing and javascript (fire= stay a distance from and all that stuff) and language and boom. Done

[22reiko]

Yup. ok. got that - but if the creator would not make that line? Or there would be a virus? That aint that simple.. Where are the good things - there comes the bad ones also. Terrorists and shit...

[KaylinJH]

americans are "dirty ass fuckin basturdly retarts"

[22reiko]

There is one simple thing, that is impossible to recreate through programming - THE THINKING!

And if you make a programm, that actually allows a computer to think - then i don't want to experiance that moment.. Just think about it - If human can think like.. Hmmm... at most - 3 thoughts at time - PC with 2gb ram and good I-Net could take over each system in the world like in 1 day.. It can analyze and make millions of facts just like in 2 minnutes... Pretty much a terminator story.. lol

[Voodoofreak35]

Kill me robot kill me!!

[Houshalter]

@22reiko, not on a von neuman machine. The human brain is hundreds if not thousands of times more powerful then a pc. Even the fastest supercomputers can't match human intelligence. Thats not to say we can't make computers think, we already have artificial intelligence, its just not up to the human level yet.

[onetocome]

@Houshalter Pc's are not powerful, they are still the same as from day one. They are just faster, but not powerful. The brain is powerful, because it's alive and it can learn, feel, etc, etc. Intelligence has nothing to do with speed. That is to say, we can't make a computer that thinks. AI will never, ever think. "It's not up to the human level yet" How about to the cell level. It's not up to any level, it hasn't advance one atom. It's just the same machine.

[Houshalter]

@onetocome, what you say is just nonsense, no offense. Define "think". I will for you, the process of solving complex problems it was not specifically programmed to solve. Learning the rules to a game without having been told them, basically. This, machines have already done, they can learn pretty much any simple task, from recognizing characters and sounds, to coming up with strategies at games that beat human made ones. But they are extremely limited by the speed and size of current computers.

[onetocome]

@Houshalter No offense, your defenition of think, stinks. I can be thinking about an icecream and I am not solving any complex problem. Scientist have "no clue" as what it means to think, so there are no real defenitions, just guesses. Sorry my friend, these machines don't "think" A simple basic program; let a=1; input i; if i=a then beep, if not then goto input. that is not thinking. In order to think, you have to be conscious, by the way, machines are not conscious.

[Houshalter]

@onetocome, "I can be thinking about an icecream and I am not solving any complex problem." No I suppose, but what you are doing is creating a simulation of the ice cream in your head. Your mind pulls the relevant data, mainly what it looks like, but also stuff like how it reacts to the enviroment, and to know that you need to have drawn generalizations from past experiences. This is something machines can and have done, they just don't do it very well, esspeically compared to humans.

[Houshalter]

@onetocome, there was an AI researcher that created a hypothetical situation to answer the AI skeptics "you can't create consciousness" argument. Look up "Artificial Addition", it's not that long.

[onetocome]

@Houshalter be more specific, can't find that video.

[Houshalter]

@onetocome, google it, it's not a video.

[dmix09]

How would it even be possible to write the code that gives rise to intelligence!!? I'm pretty sure that is the wrong approach. After all, who wrote the code that gave rise to our intelligence?

What we need to do is reverse-engineer the human brain. Once we get the hardware right, shouldn't the software wright itself?

Isn't that how it happened in our evolution?

[JamesGarfieldDavis]

The problem is, that (either what you belive) that was done by a "god" OR it happend by accident but took a very, very, very long time...

[dmix09]

Yea but it's already clear that "god" gave a scientific explanation for everything, so why stop here?

Our software is likely not software as we know it, since it "wrote itself". That is what we have yet to understand, and that's what we should be focusing on.

But first step should be trying to get the hardware right.

[Houshalter]

@dmix09, no, reverse engineering just doesn't work. We can model some higher level human heuristics and memory structures on computers, but artificial neural networks with billions of simulated neurons just aren't practical and will never be. This is why I don't like the "bottom-up" approach to AI.

[Xynok111]

4:28 the matrix!

[Jacory069]

@Xynok111 LOAD THE JUMP PROGRAM!!!!!!

[kikkin55]

@Xynok111 wwwwwwwwhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh­hhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatttttttt­ttttttttt the fk is wrong with u

[00zoid00]

dont understand if it has artificial intelligence it dosnt need code commands written with basic as it should beable to make its own without using random routines although it cant because even if we wait and let the machine learn for it self its not conscious of what its doing, thats because theres no one at home its a deadman with strings, will always be a puppet , computers can only pull strings the faster they get the faster the strings are pulled thats it, find another platform

[TheHellBound666]

humans are born with basic 'code commands' to breathe, look, eat and whatnot. If we didnt we couldn't learn anything so computers need the same (well not eat lol) I think the thing a lot of people overlook is that its impossible to make a machine thats more inteligent than we are since we cant comprehend anything more than what we as a race are smart enough to understand, if that makes any sense. The only way is to mix technology with our brains, then we could be more than what we are now.

[Serpico261]

damn i couldnt agree more with you. EXACTLY. the human brain is a synonym for the universe. its the black box that try to understand hisself.

i can not imagine if this structure of thinking will ever be understood

but we could learn such metaphysic complexcity when we interface our brain, i dont know how

[GirlTheNew]

serpico then shut the fuck up wannabe

[Serpico261]

hey u stupid whore, im a electronic engineer and u r nothing u portuguese piece of shit

eat my shit

[GirlTheNew]

go and fuck yourself you narcissistic american bastard, noone cares about your fucking job!!!!!!!!fuck youuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

[retrocareermelted]

A.I. 革命

[Yesitis808]

i hate that ladys voice...its like a cheesey-news-reporter-lady...

[therealdjcammONUTUBE]

@Yesitis808 yea, it sounds like that annoying bitch off of CNN...

[nickcars100]

@Yesitis808 its the lady from how its made series lol..n yess i hate it too!!!!!!!

[tommytalks77]

looser

[ajajtapa]

ahaha movie references

[couga8888]

It not true to say we have the hardware capacity to simulate the brain.

Estimation of the brain capacity shows that if Moore's law continue we will have the hardware necessary to simulate the brain around 2013.

That with enhance brain scanning device, and we will have the right tool to make an AI.

It will come faster than many seem to think.

[retrocareermelted]

this is the day to create advanced AI. creating creativity is a pretty insane and genius project. i want that to be my day job too. So its about ... knowledge,commonsense,intuitio­n,inquizitive,creativity,IQ,co­rdination,memory,socialization­,comparing

vision,hearing,touch,taste,sme­ll,Who,what,where,when,why,how

[PakcikRock]

build the robot that can learn...

[PakcikRock]

if you want to create artificial intelligence, you must look at how human baby learn to stand then walk and then run....

they.... we learn from our mistakes....

we learn from falling.....

please take note of this simple phenomena that we take for granted... thank you...

anyway... good job keep it up.....

[uut0]

if you learn a robot to make its own programs and reproduce itself and give it intelligence they'll eventually turn against us then we are doomed cause we are highly dependant on machines and computers to survive

[Bausernameieimue]

How can u know that?

[uut0]

common sense :P its nature the most powerfull always wins and if the computers (which we are highly dependant on) get stronger then us and if they can think they will turn against us.

[Bausernameieimue]

dude why whoud you attack some1 more powerful than you just because he is more powerfull.

[uut0]

to get more power :P

[infernalhammer]

Wrong.

Computers don't have greed. They don't have ambition. Smash your Sony Vaio in front of other computers. Will the other computers care? I think not. Projecting human emotions onto machines is nothing more than Hollywood fantasy. Pinnochio was a great story, but inanimate wooden dolls will never walk on their own and come alive no matter what Walt Disney or Hollywood may say.

[uut0]

i didnt say give them emotions of course dont they care if i smash them in front of another one.

[HaloSpartan300]

You sir are more wrong yourself.

[h333333333h]

Hi, interested in learning AI programing? Email me...it will become more clear for you :).