Added: 3 years ago
From: ReasonsToBelieve1
Views: 11,519
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (294)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • All have sinned and greatly offended the Holy God of the bible. The just punishment is death then Hell. thats not Gods will. God became a man in the person of Jesus Christ and suffered and died on the cross paying for the law you broke in His lifes blood now He can legally dismiss your case. You must repent turn from sin and trust alone in Jesus Christ for your eternal salvation.

  • this guy at the beginning is in college? omg, he is dumb as brick(must of got in on a football scholarship or something)

  • It took me about a minute to realize this guy is a creationist and not a real scientist.

  • LMAO, the dimwit at the beginning asking the questions has been brainwashed by the likes of Kent Hovind. My paryer: Please God, help this young man realize that he has a brain that is to be used for logic, reason and problem solving. Continuing on the path he is following and using words like "Scientist", "Dr Dino", etc. to describe Hovind will only lead him to utter stupidity. Hovind is a con-man currently in prison for tax evasion and is not qualified to even sell used cars. AMEN.

  • Straight up. The bible is complete bullshit. Period.

  • No :| they fucking did not. How do people not get this? I was able to comprehend this material in fucking pre-school....

  • Answer to the title.  NO.

  • That's funny - the crocodile knows it's going to happen so he sits there and waits....

  • The bible makes such random assertions its easy to spin off the information to match scienific data but truely the bible was writen by ignorant men that new basics from observation or floating information around the time, but the data is not trust worthy in terms of being scienific because its not specific its very shady and scanty data with very little detail of explanation. I really wish bible believers would keep out of science all you do is muddy up the data with your theology. 

  • kent Hovind is simply the most uneducated, lying fraud of a man I have ever seen,Hugh Ross at least accepts some basic facts! The earth is NOT 6000 years old that's laughable! and even more laughable that dinosaurs and humans coexisted has kent actually listened to himself!!! I'm a proud atheist and if intelligent design wants to be seen as a legitimate intelligent theory then it has to accept the scientific facts which Hugh does here!

  • בְּהֵמוֹת

    behêmôth

    BDB Definition:

    1) perhaps an extinct dinosaur

    1a) a Diplodocus or Brachiosaurus, exact meaning unknown

    

  • you guys are incorrigible.

  • What really puts this whole 6000 year old earth nonsense to shame, is that it was "created" by a 16th century Bishop ( NOT a mathematician ). He ASSUMED that biblical days & years were literal, calendar times. (Whose calendar did he use?) He also ASSUMED that men's ages were given accurately, instead of the historically verified "respect added years" method. In an age where 40 years was an average lifespan, if you hit 60 you were 'ancient' and years were counted by tens or hundreds.

  • @curiousgeorge1940 You sound like you were there.

  • @curiousgeorge1940 and Charles Lyell was not a geologist, but a lawyer but, everyone just blindly followed after him because it's what they hope is true.

  • @curiousgeorge1940 I left off ... No science or math there.

  • @curiousgeorge1940 Well, I do not believe it was just in the 16th cen. but even if it was,whose calendar should he have used? Then how old was Methuselah whose age was 969 yrs. And, since the ages kept dropping after the flood, how many calendars were they switching through? After the flood, ages went to 600, 400, 200, and down to 100. Why were they changing calendars so often?

  • @AndyG792 - ... because they learned how to count ? ... because they learned how to write, and not just depend on their grandparent's memory to tell them how old somebody was ? .... because reality kicked in ? ... because the birthday fairy was slowing down ?

  • 1. Leviathan had scales (dragon?)

    2. Leviathan breathed fired, very literally and not metaphorically (how can you not think dragon considering the numerous references of dragons in the bible?)

    3. Dragons are dinosaurs by it's own bloody definition

    4. Behemoth had a tail like cedar and hippos don't, though it did hang out in water so it fits the description of a plesiosaurus easier

    5. This guy's argument fails worse than janet jackson's wardrobe and the sad thing is that people will believe him.

  • Disprove evolution with the bible? How does that work...

  • That is the Problem with A Belief. The college student says "I started looking around for things that might help me have and argument against evolution". Say what you want but that statement to me at least sounds like he is saying no matter what real evidence they show me I want to find arguments so I can continue in my ignorance. ??? Why would he not want to know the truth, why work so hard to hold on to the God delusion.

  • Freshman & Dr.Dino are both ignorant pre-human thinking trolls.... How the hell are they allowed to show their faces in public ?

  • @curiousgeorge1940 Having an opposing view is no reason to prevent someone from being free to walk out in public. both people think that they are right, so how would you know if you were right or the other person was right in order to choose which one can not show his face in public? ... You wouldn't! When one person denied the other their freedom based on not agreeing with them, you have tyranny.

  • @AndyG792 - Check your calendar : it's 2011. How can you not take pity on someone who is using 4000 year old, desert tribe's fairy tales as their basic science text ? Aren't you embarrassed when Dr.Dino starts to spout his ignorance, in the face of centuries old human knowledge? If he was your friend, wouldn't you try to stop him from making an ass of himself. It's not about freedom ; it's about preventing a shameful display of stupidity.

  • @curiousgeorge1940 From what I read on here, there are plenty of people making donkey bottoms out of themselves. the Bible is right when it says that in the last days people will be willingly ignorant of 2 things: the creation and the flood and how the earth was in the water and out of the water ... but that's everyone's choice to make.

  • @AndyG792 - The last days ? You know something that the rest of us don't ? Is 2012 the real Aztec calendar " end of days " ? ... but I do agree with you that there are more "donkey bottoms" all over the web. It's a great place to spout nonsense that you wouldn't dare reveal face-to-face with another human being.

  • reasons to deceive. check out Dr. Bart Ehrman.

  • trees growing through geometric rock

    wtf is 'geometric rock'?

    and the creature in job

    the text says ' its navel is like...

    if it had a navel then it has to have been a mammal - it cannot be have been a reptile

  • @whitesquirrel7 are you putting your faith in scripture?

  • @whitesquirrel7

    I use the text as it is written - to me it is a historical document displaying the idea of the peoples of the time

    so if the text talks of the animal having a navel then it cannot be a dinosaur

    also the word is 'behemoth'

    in hebrew 'behem' means 'cattle'/ dometestic livestock

    so behem-oth is presumably related

  • @whitesquirrel7 the Hebrew word for navel is "sharir", which means firm or hard, which in turn can account for a hard part of the belly. The Geometric rock the student is referring to is layers of rock and sediment.

  • @whitesquirrel7 It simply means that his greatest strength is in the muscles of his belly. But, I think your smart enough to figure that out, you just want to poke fun at something in the Bible for your own satisfaction.

  • @whitesquirrel7 You know he means geologic.

  • @whitesquirrel7 Well its not a dino lol

  • Fucking bullshit. Hugh Ross is an agent of Satan for coming up with that 4.5 billion year old myth. The Earth is 6-10 thousand years old you crackpots!

  • @DebunkingEvolution You are willfully ignorant. That is why you guys can never ever be taken seriously.

  • @wowamonn

    Biology, however is the ONLY thing taken seriously in science.

    Creatardism is a laughing stock.....

  • @wowamonn That's not what the Bible says

  • @AndyG792 The bible does not say ALOT of things so that is not suprising.

  • @wowamonn The Bible says a lot ... I've read it. ... and continue to reread it.

  • @AndyG792 And this means what exactly?

  • @AndyG792 and therin lies the problem with you ppl.....a lack of willingness to keep expanding your horizons

  • @wowamonn

    EVIDENCE and SCIENCE.

    Learn it. 

  • @DebunkingEvolution Geologists proved the earth is old and there was no global flood over 200 years ago. Any college science student can prove Dr. Dino wrong.

  • @gregrutz True story. I wrote a paper debunking all his physics claims when I was a Junior.

  • @DebunkingEvolution

    "Hugh Ross is an agent of Satan for coming up with that 4.5 billion year old myth. The Earth is 6-10 thousand years old you crackpots!"

    >HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

    Heh, aheam.. Do post a reason to have any particular reason to believe in this Lucifer, a Kerubian angel. Satan is a mesh of various deities from neighbouring tribes to ancient Jews, and if you insert your own particular deity as an evidence, you might want to show evidence on that deity.

  • @ArmaFennica Don't take me wrong here but, although I also believe that Hugh Ross is wrong and is blinded by Satan's long-age lie, at the same time I don't think it is advantageous to use the tactics of the evolutionists and call them a crackpot. Although, most of them are too indoctrinated in evolution that they can not see proof in front of them, hopefully, some are open to reason and may see the truth. Calling someone names puts a person on the defensive by human nature and may turn them away

  • @AndyG792

    "Don't take me wrong here but, although I also believe that Hugh Ross is wrong and is blinded by Satan's long-age lie, at the same time I don't think it is advantageous to use the tactics of the evolutionists and call them a crackpot."

    >Allow me to snip this from your post;

    "blinded by Satan's long-age lie"

    >Now, do go back and read my post on this imaginary `Satan´. It is an Arc Angel.

    -Only the Judeo-Christian faith-based believers think it exists. There is no "Satans lie".

  • @AndyG792

    "at the same time I don't think it is advantageous to use the tactics of the evolutionists and call them a crackpot."

    >Tactic of the evolutionists, you say?

    -Well, given that the term `evolutionists´ was antiquated there about 100 years ago, I suggest you try to find some other term. Do you even know from where that term is from??

    "Although, most of them are too indoctrinated in evolution that they can not see proof in front of them"

    >Oh, the irony!!

    -Proof? Of your deities?

  • @ArmaFennica No not proof of deities (this should be singular) but, of scientific evidences. You know the empirical kind no the conjectural kind like animals buried rapidly in tons of sedimentary rock all over the world, the scars of where the fountains of the great deep broke open at the Mid oceanic trench, and the continents splitting apart, etc. It all fits with what the Bible says. Wow! It must be a coincidence. ... NOT!

  • @AndyG792

    "No not proof of deities (this should be singular)"

    >In christianity, there are more than one deity.

    -Or, the Jesus-cult has to be reformed. And that holy ghost-thingy...

    "but, of scientific evidences."

    >Which your faith-base lacks.

    "You know the empirical kind no the conjectural kind like animals buried rapidly in tons of sedimentary rock all over the world"

    >Nope. You are distortign Geology/Archaeology to have them fit into your particular faith-system. I'll elaborate;

  • @AndyG792

    >Buried sediments should have all manner of animals from all levels of developement. This is not the case. Hence, your flood-idea fails. Large flood would create one large layer.

    "the scars of where the fountains of the great deep broke open at the Mid oceanic trench"

    >Those would be the place where Tectonic plates meet/separate. No fountains of the deep. Volume of water, remeber that.

    "and the continents splitting apart, etc"

    >Continents have been moving quite some time..

  • @AndyG792

    "It all fits with what the Bible says."

    >Only if one ignores large chunks of the said Geological evidence. Which you apparenty do. You try to ram the `fountains of the deep´ into tectonic plates.

    "Wow! It must be a coincidence. ... NOT!"

    >It's not, your faith-based mind takes bits of information, twists is and leaves out important parts in order to augment your religious World-view.

    -What you need to do, is take the whole Geology into account. WHY there are Tectonic lines.

  • @AndyG792

    "hopefully, some are open to reason and may see the truth."

    >This is appropriate to believers..of any faith-system.

    -What is the truth, then? Your holy book? ...composed in the Council of Nicea as a tool of power. No thanks.

    If you do not think this age of Reason has given you vast improvements in life, why use the said advantages?

    -Go back to early Bronze-Age era?

    By the way, you DO know that there was these long eras? Stone Age, Bronze Age etc..?

  • @ArmaFennica The Bible wasn't 'composed' in any council. it was composed by 40+ people over a period of 400+ years but through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. They wrote what God told them to put down. .... Man's preconceived ideas of long ages has placed eras on stone age, Bronze Age, etc. Tubal cain was an artificer of Brass and Iron before the flood. After the flood, people probably used stone to make weapons since God now gave permission to eat animals after the flood.

  • @AndyG792

    "Calling someone names puts a person on the defensive by human nature and may turn them away"

    >You are an idiot to have faith in the bible. There, now we can have some polite talk.

    Your initial post indicated that you think `Satan´ is somehow real. That points towards Christianity, any of the 38 000 sects of it, OR Islam and it's few directions.

    But that Satan character is not the one to blame. But the creator who made everything as they are. Your deity made Lucifer, the morning Star

  • @ArmaFennica You can call me what you will, that doesn't bother me; I'm used to that. No big deal as, I already know that I am not an idiot, so calling me one doesn't change that. I know who I am, what I believe & why I believe in it. Yes, Satan is a real being created by God as Lucifer and put in charge of all the angels. Like people in power, it went to his head. God had given him the right to make choices & is not responsible for Satan's choice of rebellion any more than when we

  • @AndyG792

    "You can call me what you will, that doesn't bother me; I'm used to that."

    >If you distort real World information that much, not much bothers you, I'd say.

    "No big deal as, I already know that I am not an idiot, so calling me one doesn't change that."

    >Then why only take bits and pieces of entre scientific fields instead of the whole science? Only reason is to augment the faith you hold. The rest would endanger your faith, therefore you must deny it.

  • @AndyG792

    "I know who I am, what I believe & why I believe in it."

    >Likely a childhood indoctrination. Sphere of Culture is another possibility.

    "Yes, Satan is a real being"

    >Evidence...

    "created by God as Lucifer and put in charge of all the angels. Like people in power, it went to his head."

    >Evidence...

    -And your deity made it, the fault is to that entity, for if it was omnipotent it could have removed such notions and/or the Arc Angel alltogether.

    Ergo your deity wanted `satan´

  • @AndyG792

    "God had given him the right to make choices & is not responsible for Satan's choice of rebellion any more than when we"

    >Where do religious people get the idea that Angels have free will???

    -Only humans were blessed with that, it's in your theology.

    Angels are extensions of your deity, hence the Lucifer has no free will and only does what it is made to do.

    -Moreover, other Arc Angels, WHERE ARE THEY? If Lucifer wields godly powers, why no other Arc Angel is present?

  • @DebunkingEvolution You got that right. ... Amen!

  • Comment removed

  • This man makes me furious. This is counter-intelligence.

  • Wow. That fucking retard student has the IQ of a hamster....

  • @odinata

    That is an insult to a hamster.

  • Are, so we now have a new kind of Christian apologist who is trying to map the fiction in the bible to fit with mainstream scientific discoveries. Fantastic effort, but there is no way, by any stretch of the imagination that you could take the narrative in the bible and postulate that Adam and Eve lives 50,000 years ago... it just does not work, period. Plus this is not really the date science predicts the emergence of mankind, try 100,000 years ago.

  • @xNoReligionx No. No one tried to make the Bible fit with mainstream scientific discoveries. The Bible is the foundation and stands on it's own. But, when we look at science, we can see that it fits with what the Bible already said. Nothing has to be made to fit. That would be a wrong approach. The Bible doesn't need adjusting.

  • Dating techniques come up with much different dates from a Mammoth from different parts of the same animals. In temples in India, they have carved many different living animals and Triceratops also. There are stones from South America, in burial sites and they have carved stones with dinosaurs drawn all over them. Fossils which formed happened because of floods. The trees which were fossilized are the same age which are lower down as the one which are further up.

  • lol such a fail

    if your going to have poeple make rigged Qs at least do it good

    i mean some random guy asks a question and you just happen to have the very dvd that you need to explain it right on your little table thing???

    like really do these better man

    sloppy is all i got to say

  • @490er I don't think any of the questions are rigged. They only have the same questions to ask over and over again. They have simpleton questions for simpleton arguments so it's easy for everyone to understand.... they treat Noah's ark...Adam and Eve like real, historical figures and bible dates as points of references

  • @00sparkleandshiiine the weirdest thing bout this reliogion bullshit is that all types of religions have about the same storys

  • @490er Ofcourse they do because many stems from the same kind of confidence trixters.

  • @490er word.

  • @490er most have been twisted around and changed but, similarity is what one would expect if they all came from Babylon when God changed all the languages to make them spread over the whole earth. That's exactly what one would predict. but, even at Babylon they were moving away from God as that is what they were doing building a tower to the heavens to worship the sun and stars. they told god that they were not spreading over the earth but rather staying together in one place. (so they th

  • Nuts, but still less nuts then the other nuttier nuts.

  • Someone is not going to medical school...

  • Baby facepalm: because even a baby knows how stupid this shit is.

  • No matter how many times things are explained to creationists and young Earth people, they will not get it.... they have their head so far up the bibles ass that they can't see REALITY.

    Nice to see a calm logical answer to all these useless questions put forth by religious folk... welcome to the 21st century my friend.

  • @jdellio That's exactly what we think. No matter how many times or how well something is explained (as well as possible on this short box) evolutionists and old earth people just don't get it. They have been so indoctrinated by the 'Theory' ( and it's really barely a hypothesis) that you guys can't see REALITY.

  • Ross may be misleading because of his own beliefs, but at least he sets some YEC stuff to rest. And that is Always good.

  • "and this is the product"

  • @23pedrow Read his arguments before making assumptions. He's already accounted for this in his books.

  • i have a problem Dr Hugh Ross. you say the flood was 11000 years before Abraham so you must have missed Genesis ch11: 10-27. it shows that Noahs son Shem was 390 years old when Abraham was born, infact if you believe the bible at all Shem who lived to 600 was alive when Isaac and Jacob walked the earth. so this troubles me that only use the bits of bible that suit your finding. Scientific findings have been proven wrong again and again, but in the end the bible always end up being correct.

  • @23pedrow Lol good one. 

  • @23pedrow Amen!!!

  • Ross is a wolf in sheep's clothing, a deceiver who is sowing the dark seeds of confusion in the minds of true believers.

  • Thumbs up for science and logic

  • how funny that the guy asked the question about dr dino and he coincidentally had a dvd of him debating the same person he was talking about??? how did he know he was going to mention dr dino and why does the audience laugh for stupid things

  • Wow, this guy is out of his meteor blasted tree. How come only the tree gets "blasted" through these layers and nothing else around the tree, like the layers the tree was origonaly in? How does this meteor get the tree from a laying down position to a vertical position with out moving the layers around it? Why isn't there a bunch of layers above the tree trunk all destroyed from the trunk pushing them up and out of it's way, shouldn't there be a pile of broken layers above the trunk? U R WRONG.

  • @Thompsond10 LOL ... Amen brother.

  • @dduble07 Thumbs up for you burning in hell fucker

  • @Notagayusername10 thumbs up for notr believing in fairy tales

  • @Notagayusername10 aww isn't that sweet you're so ignorant and powerless to the way the world works you have to lash out at people who think differently than you.

  • @ImmaDwarfKicker You know whats even funnier...you got trolled faggot

  • This guy is Not a Christian this guy is an evolutionist he lies like crazy. He ignores the Bible and pretends to be a Christian. If you want to learn some real Science go watch the favorited videos on my channel.

  • @coolvideo28 o im sorry didnt know you knew him personally.

  • I wonder why people think it's crazy to believe that people & dinosaurs coexisted, considering we're currently coexisting with hundreds of species previously only known from fossils... Maybe a thousand years from now people will say, "man, you've gotta be delusional if you think people coexisted with coelacanths & wollemi pines!"

  • @aerialpunk Amen!

  • @aerialpunk Except no fossil evidence of dinosaurs other than birds exist in the human era.... If humans and dinosaurs like tyrannosaurids c0-existed, we would have farmed them...

  • Well, he gets the time scale for the dawn of Homo Sapiens wrong, but he's pretty good about dealing with the Laetoli footprints.

  • Did dinosaurs and humans live at the same time? No. 

  • Dr Dino..A scientist? Kent Hovind? The Guy with the Degree from Patriot Bible College? the guy who is serving 10 years for fraud?................yeah, that guy......WHO CARES,BUY OUR STUFF AND GIVE US MONEY FOOL..

  • @TheJameySuede I don't know much about Kent Hovind, but I'm starting to think there must not be any strong arguments against his ideas when people constantly to resort to picking on his school or his financial habits to "refute" him.

  • @aerialpunk If you don't care to find the many many refutations of his ideas, you're OBVIOUSLY not looking AT ALL

  • @TheJameySuede Nope, I haven't looked very hard, frankly I don't care that much about what he thinks. But whenever someone mentions him, they never mention arguments against his ideas, they only make jabs at his education and finances. It makes me wonder if the arguments against him, whatever they are, are actually all that good if nobody cares to repeat them.

  • @aerialpunk I don't know if ur trying to plant a seed or what, but It would take u mere seconds to look anytime your "wondering" about his ideas and save commenting. I think it is pertinent to attack the guys credentials if he believes that he is a peer of people with real degrees,his is worth less than the paper its printed on,it's essentially a bogus internet diploma..He might do better to not even mention his dubious education, because if he was a science teacher,I pity those kids he "taught"

  • @TheJameySuede I'm not sure what you mean about planting seeds... I'm just not a fan of putting credentials above ability & ideas. You can go to the highest-rated university in the world, get a PhD, and still come out a total idiot. And people who get degrees online (or even not at all) can have brilliant ideas and/or be excellent at their jobs. So, I'm of the opinion that if his ideas suck all that bad, you'd think people would discuss them instead of where he got his degree.

  • @aerialpunk Ok,lets think of it this way,the degree he got has a bias that can't be overlooked.So with his ideas he has a bunch of square pegs thousands of them(Bible Verses),what we know about the natural world has many many different shaped holes,some of them are even Square!, but his square pegs wont fit into all holes.especially the circular hole of science that says there isn't a ice canopy around the world in space (Which Hovind has spoken of and released in dvd's (that kids watch!))

  • @TheJameySuede Alright, fair enough then. That's much better.

  • @aerialpunk Not to mention Hovind is a fraud, a liar, and an ignorant piece of shit. He's currently in prison right now, for Tax Fraud. He's not smart at all, it's just painfully easy to get religitards to fork over cash in the name of Jeebus.

  • @mmmmmarcus I read the court transcrit and they never did reallycome up with evidence that he was gulity. But, the jury said that he must be and so they threw the book at him and gave him maximum sentence. I think that it was because he was reaching so many people. There are people we hear about all the time in the Government that have not even made attempt to pay any taxes and nothing is down to them and they continue on like nothing is wrong. Now, that is definitely wrong.

  • @aerialpunk But it's basically a moot point now as far as credibility goes in most peoples eyes,he banged that nail in himself.

  • belief in the supernatural is a mental disorder..... talking to you, christians.

  • @WickedGravityVideo Prove it.

  • @sports444life

    Do you know what delusions are?

  • @tuitaitei It takes more faith to be an atheist than to believe in God. I don't know what your take is on religion, but no i'm not delusional, i've actually been complimented on my "level-headedness".

  • @sports444life yeah you're right it's easier to believe the bible. I mean, it's not like it was written by ignorant bronze age people who had literally the education of a modern day 1st grader! I'm so glad god gave them his word so they could write it down for him. God is so great. I owe him everything and i pray every day.

  • @ImmaDwarfKicker Ignorant of what? Just because people back then didn't know complex science or math doesn't mean they weren't able to effectively record and communicate what they heard and experienced. There are more ignorant people now!

  • @sports444life Wow, inspiring! You are living, breathing proof of your argument. Brings a tear to my eye.

  • @ImmaDwarfKicker Lol. I love internet sarcasm!

  • @sports444life That is true we have very ignorant people now that will believe anything but god.

  • @13SuperKings Yes sir.

  • @WickedGravityVideo Are you a psychologist?

  • @nashhinton "The biblical kinds are like the genus, but very rarely the family of an animal"

     Define "Family" because you're not using "family" in the proper scientific sense...

  • @nashhinton You are an animal. No amount of prayer or sacrifice will change this. In the end, a benevolent god would favor Atheists for not being duped by false idols who collect money on sundays for a bigger church parking-lot.

  • @mmmmmarcus, Genetic diversity shmersity. Prove Abiogenesis, and then I'll start listening...

  • @mmmmmarcus, So all that "repopulating the earth" thing mentioned in many science fiction movies doesn't mean anything to you, does it?

  • @Nashhinton "So all that "repopulating the earth" thing mentioned in many science fiction movies doesn't mean anything to you, does it?" No.

  • @mmmmmarcus, Here's a question: If all the dinosaurs died out, how did we get birds according to your theory? What happened? Did the dinosaur crap out a bird when the meteors began falling on him?

  • @Nashhinton Birds are dinosaurs. Fail.

  • @nashhinton "fossils alone prove the noahic flood" Nothing proves the "noahic flood" Furthermore, how the FUCK would you fit over a billion individual animals on a boat? besides, the simple two of each story doesnt work:  I suggest you research something called a "Population-Bottleneck".

  • @mmmmmarcus, there wasn't a billion animals on the ark. the number was something like 5000-7000 different biblical kinds. we're not talking about every species. Do you honestly think that God would put every ceratopsian on the ark. No! the biblical kinds are like the genus, but very rarely, the family of an animal.

  • Cats arent mentioned in the bible. That doesnt mean cats and humans didnt live together...

  • Not every aquatic life form died...

  • @Nashhinton To explain the presence of our fishes today, you would require two things: Evolution. Or an unheard-of chapter called: "Genesis 2, Life strikes back"

  • @mmmmmarcus, No. You obviously misunderstand. People who read the bible interpret the theories of science differently. They apply science to the stories of the bible. Evolutionists apply science to their naturalistic theories. Same observations, but diverse interpretations. You might say that fish evolved over time to produce the current types of fish. Creationists, however hypothesize that the mixing of salt and freshwater during the flood resulted in a mass extiction of certain aquatic forms.

  • @mmmmmarcus HAHAHAH nice!

  • Hey creationists! How come trilobites aren't mentioned in the bible?

     How come Eurypterids aren't mentioned? Why isn't tyrannosaurus in the bible? We all know leviathan and Behemoth were just a crocodile and a Hippo. Also, a worldwide flood would eradicate all aquatic life. Drop a freshwater fish into saltwater and see what happens. >=D

  • @mmmmmarcus, actually, the flood killed some aquatic life forms. After the flood, many animals became extinct. Take for example the trilobites and pterygotus

  • @Nashhinton Sorry buddy. I'm using rather basic biology here. According to your fucked-up theory, Not all but "some" die. In such an event, only creatures that can suddenly adapt will survive. Some microscopic organisms will survive, fill niches, and EVOLVE. If the flood really happened, the only living fish left would be mosquitofish and tilapia! And what's funnier, is the massive wave of disease that results from all those dead bodies. LOL you fuckers don't care about the truth.

  • @mmmmmarcus, Where's the proof that they would all die out?

  • @mmmmmarcus, How do you know that?

  • @mmmmmarcus, Do you believe that massive amounts of change can induce speciation and natural selection to occur at a faster rate? If you deny this, you're an idiot...

  • @Nashhinton "where's the proof that they would all die out?" Toss a freshwater fish into saltwater. Toss a marine species in freshwater. That's my proof. Now about this "god" of yours.. WHERE'S YOUR PROOF?

  • @mmmmmarcus, Ever wonder why we have so many fossils? Fossils alone prove the noahic flood. Fossils are made by quick a quick death and burial. When was the last time you saw a person or animal get buried alive by mud or dirt? Happens very rarely doesnt it?

  • @Nashhinton "when was the last time you saw a person or animal get buried alive by mud or dirt?" I watched a debris-flow destroy an entire neighborhood, killing dozens of people in the process.

     The place: La Conchita. I heard the screams of a desperate father after he learned his family was trapped inside his home, covered with a entire hillside of clay, felled trees, and hundreds of massive boulders. That "god" of yours sure has one fucked-up sense of humor, doesn't he?

  • @mmmmmarcus, and how often does that happen? think about it....

  • @Nashhinton It's happening as we speak right this very second. And of course, you dont read about Population bottlenecks.. Typical. Let me clarify for you. A population Bottleneck results when you dont have enough genetic diversity. When you inbreed, not only do fucked-up things happen, but you also lack new genes with strengths against illnesses. If you only had a single Male and female of each species, they would all go extinct, humans included. Naturally, this doesnt matter to you

  • @mmmmmarcus, Population bottle neck? Isnt coming from a common ansestor a population bottleneck? And you apparently didn't answer my question about the platypus. Is the platypus the missing link between a duck and a beaver? >: ) What about the echidna? Mwu ha ha ha!

  • I'm a creationist so I guess that means I'll believe one book instead of a million contradicting it ....oh and I'll ignore ALL THE EVIDENCE THAT SHOWS CREATIONISM IS BULLSHIT

  • As soon as I heard drdino.com. I said "Oh shit".

  • Hugh Ross adds words and twists things in the Bible beware of this wacko.

  • @vindarm I agree. Trying to twist science and the Bible together never works. The mental gymnastics are amazing. He is almost ready to let go of the old myths and embrace reality.

  • " His tail sways like a cedar..."Job 40:17 - Have you ever seen the tail of a hippo - its like a fly swoter. Nothing like the trunk of a ceder. I agree with much of what Ross says but there is no way in hell you can compare a hippos tail with that of a Ceder tree.

  • I am a scientist and I'll tell you right now! Evolution is not just a theory. It is scientific fact.

  • @somethingdiffereable

    Your not a scientist; and it's call The Theory Of Evolution for a reason.

  • @learrus They just changed it. Some people are so stupid they will never understand what a Scienitific Theory is, so now they call it the Fact of Evolution so there is no more confusion.

  • @somethingdiffereable then why is it called a theory!!! and not Fact of Evolution.