SGT Lagasse and SGT Brooks destroy the official story.

[tbirdman1991]

Lets make one thing clear, If you think a plane struck the pentagon, you are wrong.

[DBCOOPER888]

Terrible video. Two random cops are not experts on this. Witnesses never have complete, photographic memories when it comes to experiencing traumatic events.

[Moreofthesamez]

@DBCOOPER888 Oh really? What is "traumatic" about seeing a plane to your left? NOTHING. They were not in the Pentagon so they were not traumatized by the event, you're full of horse shit

[DBCOOPER888]

@Moreofthesamez You're an idiot. A terrorist attack that happened so quick for them is indeed traumatic. Memories in general are bad, especially when something like this happens.

[Moreofthesamez]

@DBCOOPER888 Do they look traumatized to you? They seem very normal to me. Do you even know what Trauma is? And they repeat over and over that the plane came from the other side. What, in your wide experience as a psychiatrist, would cause this? And by the way they are not the only two people in the vicinity of this gas station who said the plane passewd over the other siade. Everybody who was there said the same. That's a weird kind of trauma

[DBCOOPER888]

@Moreofthesamez Do you know what a fucking traumatic event is? It has less to do with the person's reaction itself, and more to do with how fucking quick the event took place. People naturally forget key details when something like that goes by so fast.

[DBCOOPER888]

@Moreofthesamez Like, if someone witnesses a woman's purse getting stolen by a mugger, they often forget the color of their shirt, or what the guy looks like, for example. Key details get lost. It's why witnesses are often unreliable in a court room setting.

[Moreofthesamez]

@DBCOOPER888 So then we can't believe anybody about 911 cos everyone in the world was following it and was traumatized, but you choose to believe everyone who saw it all happen the way the government say it happened, idiot

[DBCOOPER888]

@Moreofthesamez You continue to show you're a retard. I'm talking about being there in person you fool.

[Moreofthesamez]

@DBCOOPER888 You are a twat, if a person is traumatized they are sick and need psychiatric treatment. These two police officers are NOT traumatized, now go back to sleep and pay your taxes to the people who murdered your countrymen on 911 RETARD

[DBCOOPER888]

@Moreofthesamez Stop being a fucking retarded idiot. People are not stuck in the psychiatric ward for experiencing in person some violent event. They go through grief counseling, at most. Murders, robberies, rapes, muggings, etc happen on a daily basis in this country.

[DBCOOPER888]

@Moreofthesamez Further, you're missing the point entirely. It's a traumatic event, I'm not saying they were traumitized. You know jack shit about human psychology as it applies to witnessing fast-paced crimes that happen inapparently the blink of an eye.

[Moreofthesamez]

@DBCOOPER888 You know jack shit about these 2 policemen. They say that they are 100% certain where they saw the plane, and I believe that they know what they are talking about and I believe you are full of shit, now good riddance and keep taking the blue pill

[EddieAteDynomite]

6:04 - 6:10

[jboritzki]

All this video does is help to show that Truthers dont' know what they're talking about. This cop says the poles the truther say were knocked down were not knocked down. The cop says the "official story" the truther is talking about is not an "official story" at all. This is the evidence of the truthers? lol. C'mon guys, this is getting silly.

[sharpshoota666]

so what what was this video saying was it a missile or drone?????? plz help

[AstralPlaner]

You're right about that rebelious123.

Remind me again who the enemy is....

[rebelious123]

regaurdless of what happend or who saw what, we (THE U.S.A.) were attacked by the enemy and we ALL should stick togeather and come up with a plan to ensure that THIS type or ANY type of terrorism disrupts OUR country EVER AGAIN........

[sirreal6]

@rebelious123 YOu are weak minded. Perhap you STILL believe 19 arabs with boxcutters flew around the NE corridor unimpeded, unintercepted for almost 80 minutes while at the same time, we were drilling for planes being taken over by terorists? Are you a simpleton?

[luvmyctd]

@rebelious123 That's right! The people that attacked the USA on 9/11 are STILL truly running the country and this WILL happen again. Time for people to wake up and stop hiding behind their fear.

[brian78045]

In 1997 NORAD said they insure, "Aircraft flying over our air space are monitored seven days a week, 24 hours a day."

In 2004 the Air Force contradictorily said, "Before 2001, 1st Air Force was charged with keeping an eye on the nations borders, usually looking for threats in the form of Russian aircraft skirting too close for comfort to the mainland. In those few hours, the commands mission went from looking outward to looking inward."

See the 5 articles on NORAD at DNotice (org).

[meth062]

"You know, we never talked about it"

Wow

[uncledevo]

Google:

April Gallop

german engineers help the usa

finnish military expert

[seekYEthetruth]

Youtube:

Pentagon Attack Cab Driver Lloyde English's virtual confession.

Youtube:

Neils Harrit - Danish scientist. RE: WTC dust samples.

The truth is rising. Investigate 9/11 NOW

[oppsspirit]

Some people can't get it. They could have been there to see the plane fly over and still believe it hit the building? Theses types are willingly ignorant, deaf and blind. These types are so deceived that their seared conscience has cause them to walk in a comatose mind set....They question nothing and believe everything. Like an open wound their vulnerable to every kind of disease. This information should, to the sane thinker, cause some questioning and if it doesn't, your mind is diseased.

[aeghbal]

Why are you people so surprised by the American government.They have been doing things like this forever. If you find the perfect proof noone is gona look at it because its not official. Citizens have bias and believe anything but what the government says is a conspiracy nutt's bulshit story. The world knows the American government for what it is and does. Americans have no idea.

[OldSmellyCrotch]

Sorry, but did someone just say that 'State Officials' aren't credible witnesses?? =S

I think a statement like that is beyond contempt.

[mcfallows]

We never ever talked about what happened. Nobody, including the 9/11 commission approached them to give testimony? You have got to be kidding me. Do you really think these guys would state anything to the contrary. These are US Government employees. They would be terminated in a minute if they stated the truth. I am sorry. These guys have no credibility.

[nattinat5]

THANKYOU!!! Yes exactly this is rediculous

[MercBezerk]

You have no idea what you are talking about. The fact that they place the plane on the north side of the Citgo proves an inside job. That means the poles weren't hit. The cab was not hit by pole 1. The plane could not show up low and level as seen on the gate cam, and can't cause the directional damage leading the C ring hole as outlined by the ASCE report.

Do some goddamned research. These witnesses did not realize the implications of what they saw until after this footage was released.

[wakenbake22]

Lagasse likely goes to the forward pumo, because that gives a better view of the Pentagon.

From the rear pump, seeing the plane, diving into his car out of fear, an instinct, makes it less likely he could see the impact.

[wakenbake22]

But debunkers keep claiming that he is wrong about the pump he was at, so he is wrong about everything.

It is pathetic.

He can't see thru the building no matter what pump he thought he was at. It doesn't change his view of the NoC flight path.

If Lagasse sees the plane, the side, the windows, it is north of Citgo.

[coz2112]

So they both say it was 77 that hit the pentagon. So everyone agrees thats what happened. Like he says, not a missle or a global hawk, then the edit the rest. lol

and like he says the only debate is the angle, then he says "for a fact" lightpoles away from the official ones, but still way away from his "hand drawn estimation on a photgraph" lol To hit the ones he points out it would have flown right over his head.

[wakenbake22]

"So they both say it was 77 that hit the pentagon"

No, they both believe the plane they saw (never claim it was flight 77, Brooks says white, Lagasse says silver AA) hit the Pentagon.

What the saw was the plane NoC.

He is wrong about light poles, and is trying to say the official story is wrong about that detail, or that Craig is wrong, because Lagasse wants to believe the official story.

[wakenbake22]

At 5:45, Lagasse clearly states that he did not see the plane hit any light poles.

[OperationMockingbird]

he "Doomsday" plane flew over the Pentagon acting as the decoy. And the A-3 Skywarrior in AA Flight 77 paint scheme was the drone.

The perps had to "sell" a huge plane flying in close proximity to the Pentagon or onlookers would be suspicious that a plane never did fly close. "Selling" the crime.

The E4-B is a military plane and could fly over the Pentagon because it has a Mode 4 or 5 IFF transponder giving the "friendly" signal to disable the missile battery hidden in the Pentagon.

[OperationMockingbird]

The FDR from "Flight 77" actually came from the "Doomsday" FDR. That's why Pilotsfor911truth analyzed it and never came close enough to the ground to hit Wedge One of the Pentagon. So this means the "Doomsday" FDR was planted days after to jive with

the "official story" of finding a FDR in the wreckage. And the FDR data corroborates the interviews of Brooks and Lagasse.

[ammannojacku]

Okay..But why did Not take or Put the Two SGTs' Testomonies in 911 Invistigation book?

[Gicior]

This just enforces that the conspiracy theory is the one presented by fox and other media. It is the real story that the media brands as conspiracy.

[Ecothearcy]

The Christian right is aiding and abetting the deception on behalf of their real father.

[thewholesoul]

great video: i saw the pentacon in full. the official story is COMPLETELY BUNKED

thats the pentagon proven to be inside job cover-up

building 7: barry jennings and mike hesh INSIDE wtc 7 experienced EXPLOSIONS and this happened BEFORE the twin towers collapsed

OFFICIAL LIE BUNKED

how long before we can catch the scum and hang em for treason!!!

i pray i will live to see the day

[wakenbake22]

No serial numbers matching debris to flight 77. 85 seized videos. North of Citgo and white plane witnesses. Too many flight paths given by official story. 4 black boxes found at the Pentagon, at least 2 were planted. ASCE can't fit a 757 to the damage. No damage to the lawn or floor of Pentagon. 16 ft hole in the c-ring. Cover-up of first firemen. pristine lawn The 10:10 pull back order. No inspection of debris. FBI says no calls from Barbara Olson. Lime green primer on parts.

[cherrielane]

Yeee haaa, great video guys!

5*

[BTUaplenty]

The interviewer missed the chance of a lifetime when he ignored what Sgt. Lagasse had to say about the knocked down light poles.

Why not let the Sgt. draw a couple of dots on the map to show where HE seen the knocked over light poles?

Was he ignored because what he saw is not what is being promoted on the internet??

Go back and do the interview right.

[quaheedus]

Can you not hear?..he said he did not see it clip the poles because you cant see the poles from where they were.

[KokomoJ0]

you didnt see what happened to rummys plane when it hit one pole at 1/2 that speed did you? you actually believe that an aluminum plane can clip what? 6 steel poles and not be torn to ribbons? Get a clue bro.

[quaheedus]

Rummys plane? you mean Bush's plane maybe you shoud get a clue you got that wrong! The only info you have about that accident is what Loose Change has told you.

[BTUaplenty]

I think the interviewer missed a good chance when he did not follow up on where Sgt. LaGasse said the light poles were knocked down....

why not draw some bog dots on the map?

...dumbkopf you missed the chance of a life time to scoop new evidence...Aarrrgghh!!!

[BTUaplenty]

The good sergeant never heard of the light poles being knocked down by the south angle.

But he did know about global hawk and cruise missile.

If he was unaware of the light pole paradox, that says he didn't do much surfing about the event.

Where did he get the Global Hawk and cruisemissile idea from?Sounds like ..maybe..the interviewer had a conversation before the camera rolled..

[USisGreat]

not to mention if the government was going to go through all the trouble of planting bombs and having the plane fly over and time it just perfectly, then why not just have the plane hit the pentagon to make it more believable

[USisGreat]

djjimi, what about the witnesses from the other angles? they would see the plane flying away, you guys gott think about that kindof obvious stuff before you say crap like that. not to mention if it were an illusion then where did flight 77 go?

[KokomoJ0]

The flight data recorder showed that flt 77 never went below 273 feet in its flight. Bombs make nice neat round holes like that seen in ring 3 and wtc building 6. Personally I would not rule out "all of the above" I think the bottom line here is that the official story is trash. Planes do not diappear, there should be 120 tons of scrap metal. Metal does not vaporize, unless of course we want to bring nukes into it!

[quaheedus]

the flight recorder did not show that. if so where is your source for this info?..another conspiracy site. you conspiracy theorist thinks this video shows something, and it it does..it shows that there was a 757 that hit the Pentagon.

[KokomoJ0]

You are delusional. The government claims 19 cave men CONSPIRED to take out our trillion dollar defense system and did is successfuly. I do not agree with the GOVERNMENTS CONSPIRACY THEORY. You have a browser do a search for it, there are a couple private researchers who have analysed it. How hard this must be for those who accepted authority as truth in exchange for truth as authority. ---George Massey

[quaheedus]

You are delusional and must throw in they cavemen lie to reinforce your delusion.They were not Cavemen.They did not and had never lived in caves.The defense system is not for domestic commercial airliners.All they really had to do was take some flying lessons and get past the security with the box cutters and have the balls to do it.

[KokomoJ0]

goog it man. sheesh. Then when you are done show me 100 tons of plane scrap! Thats a pile about 20 feet high by 30 feet around ok. Not one tiny little engine and one tiny nose strut and call it a 757 LOL Like really get a clue, this is to simple to understand for you? A 757 has "2" engines not one, show me a pic of the second then! LOL

[quaheedus]

BUsh's plane was a Gulfstream G1159A,holds 12 passengers,its wingspan is 77 feet,it weighs 31,000lbs vs a 757 which darries over 200, has a span of 124ft,weighs around 250,000 lbs,8+ times as heavy. I live in Houston and have seen the poles the plane hit.They are 120 feet tall and over 3 feet wide at the point where they bolt to a huge concrete base,they are not the tiny poles at the pentagon with breakaway bases.. so get a clue,bro!

[KokomoJ0]

Hey its still thin aluminum just more of it. Planes,(airbuses), at 300+ knots get ripped to shreds in little hail storms,(goog it), yet you think they can hit 6 heavy steel poles and not be splattered all over the freeway and lawn you are delusional. I am serious get a clue.

[quaheedus]

The poles are about 6-700 feet from the impact area.The plane was moving about 750ft per second, so you have no idea how much damage the poles did to the plane because it crashed into a 24 inch thick steel reinforced concrete wall at 500 mph about a second or less after hitting the poles..the damage would be irrelevant.. it would hit the Pentagon before it hit the ground.

[KokomoJ0]

No matter how you want to spin it in the end you gotta come up with an addition 50 tons of aircraft scrap, a second engine and engine parts that actually look like a rolls or prat. I love it when these guys who did zero research with no understanding of what they are talking about come on spew the official story. Easy show us the rest of the SCRAP! put up or shut up.

[quaheedus]

why should it look like a Prat when it was a Rolls Royce RB211-535E4?and you need to make up your mind.. one minute your saying there is not enough plane wreckage to be a 757 the next you are saying its a doomsday plane, which is a 747 and would have at least 30% more wreckage and 4 engines..you still did not answer as to what you think hit the Pentagon.

[KokomoJ0]

The engine is only relevant to comparing the site pics to what boeing supplied. They do not match. The E4 was correctly identified by several witnesses and cnn filmed it doing a treetop level flyover of the pent at precisely the moment the pent was struch. The E4 is white and blue. Still need some 60 some odd tons of scrap. I dont get into who done it or what hit it, all I know is a 757 did not hit it. We need a REAL investigation to get those answers.

[quaheedus]

You are just repeating what Loose Change and other conspiracy sites tell you about the engine.The engine wreckage matches an RB211-535E4 exactly. Loose Change Lies. They show the exact same technical drawing for two different engines,which isnt possible.. How could CNN record it at the same moment the pentagon was struck?they were not there.. there was no reason for them to be there..if so where is the footage?

[KokomoJ0]

you are just plain good ole fashioned wrong. first off the plane was clocked at 300 knots. you make a specious argument and its nonsense. If a plane hit those poles the greater majority of it would be splattered all over the lawn and the rest have bounced into the pent. Why dont you do a little bit of homework on planes crashes etc etc etc etc.

[Dracanon26]

I agree. I drove by the crash site after 9/11, there was NO wreckage....a plane that large, would have had tons of wreckage, would have taken weeks to clean up, not twenty four fucking hours....I was stationed at Marine Barracks 8th & I on that day. Semper Fi! OOOORAHHHH!!!!!!!!! Nuremberg trial for BUSH!!!!

[KokomoJ0]

There you go. Just pretend you never read that I posted that little hail storms rip up planes. They just tear huge holes in them. If you think a plane can hit even a 500 pound pole at 300 knots without getting ripped up, 6 poles no less, you are as delusional as the people who think they can fly through both sides of the twin towers intact as seen in the faux news special. Breakaway bases? Rubber coated and spring loaded too huh? ROTFLMFAO

[KokomoJ0]

Still waiting for your pics showing the 60 tons of scrap from that 757 you "think" went into the pentagon. Where is it? WAITING...........

[quaheedus]

are you 12?..no one ever said the planes went through the twin towers intact..intact would mean still together as in a whole plane. Intact-1.not altered, broken, or impaired; remaining uninjured, sound, or whole; untouched; unblemished:

[KokomoJ0]

Laughable, goog:

"Evan Fairbank interview"

and

"North Face Explosion Plume"

You are much to uninformed to keep my interest.

When you come up with 60 tons of scrap for 93 and 77 I am all ears. Waiting.

[bpaulg]

Lagasse and Brooks are trying to fit their stories with the official story, but don't realize that they are on the wrong side of the Citgo. Lagasse says that the plane hit the building he saw it go in. He says that the light poles that were knocked down weren't knocked down. He doesn't know what he is talking about. Brooks says he saw a United plane, with the United blue logos on it. He is is wrong.

[quaheedus]

You are grasping at straws! The fact is they did see a large jet airliner crashing into the pentagon..the fact that he said it was a United plane means nothing..before 911 how many people that did not fly often new the color scheme of AA or could distinguish between a 757,767,etc... not many.

[bpaulg]

Brooks described a United airlines plane with blue 'United' on the side. He was not guessing, he says that is what he saw. The United color scheme with the blue United did not appear until 2004. He is lying. In 2001 United planes were grey and blue with white 'United Airlines' on the side. How could he see the 2004 color scheme in 2001?

[apromoterofgod]

I thought parts slammed into the other things causing damage to them.

[USisGreat]

mkspence is right, there were HUNDREDS of witnesses who reported seeing Flight 77 fly over them and Hundreds who reported seeing Flight 77 HIT the Pentagon, but there are ZERO witnesses who reported seeing Flight 77 fly over the Pentagon and keep going away, and lytetrip, if it was still a passenger jet that hit the pentagon, then what are you trying to say?

[djjimi]

I'll bet you two grand that if you saw a plane fly overhead at low altitude (say 250 feet or so) and an explosion at ground level just where the plane would dissapear over the horizion and through clouds of smoke, you would believe that you had witnessed a plane hit that building. Anyone who knows anything about large scale illusion will tell you this... unless of course you believe that David Copperfield really did make the Statue of Liberty disapear.

[OperationMockingbird]

If you all really want to know what hit the Pentagon, it was a surplus Navy Douglas A-3 Skywarrior retrofitted with Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote control systems, fire control systems, engines, transponders and radio-radar-navigation systems.

[quaheedus]

it makes no sense.. why retrofit anything then? why not just use the Global Hawk.. besides the engine wreckage is way to big to be from a Global Hawk.The wreckage is from a Rolls Royce RB211-535E4 engine.

[debunkthepunk]

Clearly mkspence is trying to "discredit" this video so it conforms to the "official" theory. And clearly shows he has an agenda with all the 9/11 videos on his profile. Psyop agents are all over YouTube. Mkspence, you disgust me.

[mkspence]

I disgust myself at time, e.g., whenever I remove lint from my navel.

Like many of the 9/11 videos, this video raises more questions than it answers, e.g., if Flight 77 overflew the Pentagon at the same time a bomb was detonated, then where is the evidence of Flight 77 leaving the scene? Flight 77 was tracked by the FAA, and a military C-130 observed it strike the building. Where are the eyewitnesses stating they saw a 757 leaving the scene at 500+ knots less than 100 feet from the ground?

[quaheedus]

nope mkspences is making sense..I suppose you are disgusted by people that use their brain and do not believe in delusional fantasies.

[bill0w]

This aint the country we thought it was kids. All the evidence says inside job. And it all fit's together like a jigsaw puzzle. It's time for the rat's to start bailing to Argentina. {Warning to Argentina] Don't let these creeps in.

[mkspence]

Both officers say they saw the plane, that the plane was a commercial aircraft. At 0:37, Sgt Lagasse states, "the one thing that made me realize what kind of plane it was, was being able to see both engines."

A Boeing 757 has two engines.

Both officers drew a map showing that the plane struck the Pentagon.

[lytetrip]

Uh huh. We do not deny it was a passenger jet. But it flew on the opposite side of the station necessary to hit the light poles or damage the building as it was damaged.

Are you sure you watched the movie?

[Moreofthesamez]

@mkspence But neither officer says that they saw that plane strike the Pentagon.....

[mkspence]

5:39 - SGT Lagasse - "0-percent chance it was a missile, 0-percent chance it was a Global Hawk."

Both men confirm that a large commercial aircraft struck the Pentagon. Not a drone, not a missile - a large, commercial aircraft.

If the "official story" is that American Airline Flight 77--a Boeing 757--struck the Pentagon, then the statements made by these two witnesses confirm the official story.

[lytetrip]

It is impossible for the plane to be on the north side of the station and still have hit the light poles and caused the physical damage. The plane was timed with the explosion/fireball so they were fooled into believing it hit.

There was no missile and there was no global hawk but the plane could not have hit the building.

You forgot the beginning of his quote.

"There is zero percent chance the plane was on the south side."

[mkspence]

At 7:04, we hear, "the official story says they were" [referring to the light poles].

Sgt. Lagasse replies, "what official story? The only official story would be the Arlington County Police report done after the event. There's no official story other than that . . . That's the official story. Anything else isn't official . . . I can't be any clearer about it."

You may want to rename your video, so it accurately reflects their statements.

[lytetrip]

Obviously you didn't pay attention because we demonstrated how the ASCE report AND the 9/11 commission both place the plane on the opposite side of the station. Clearly Lagasse hadn't seen these reports. Are you claiming these reports aren't official?

[mkspence]

I didn't hear anything said by either of these officers that supports your hypothesis of an "explosion/fireball" or a bomb.

To introduce the idea of a bomb without any corroborating evidence raises far more questions

than it answers.

I like your video of the interior of the VDOT control center; I've heard mention of their cameras recording evidence, but "they--whoever that might be--won't release the tapes. Any tapes from 9/11 would be appreciated.

[daliOtter]

But their testimony contridicts the official version of what happened. It would seem that with so many unanswered questions that every good American would support a new investigation!

[quaheedus]

but what their testimony does show is that there was a 757 that hit the pentagon.

[KokomoJ0]

No. You cannot have a plane crash without a big pile of aluminum. It does not vaporize regardless of the speed of the crash. Has to be 100 tons of scrap somewhere and 2 engines not one. What happened is that many witnesses seen an E4b doomsday plane flying the same course parallel to the alleged flight 77.

[KokomoJ0]

CNN showed it gaining altitude from tree top level as reported by the public, and CNN mentioned it at the exact time the pentagon was hit. Later cnn removed the time stamp from their video clip but many people still have the original with the time stamp. If they cannot show you the right amount of scrap there was no plane it really is just that freaking simple.

[Zabooka1]

Plus... check out Pandora's Black Box, which analyses the Black Box Flight Data Recorders for Flight American 77, which was meant to have struch the Pentagon.

google thepentacon and pilotsfor911truth

[bopn]

This is superb investigative journalism. Great job.

[FrequentlyFried]

yea its pretty convincing

[Denny976]

Watch the whole story here: thepentacon . com

[bopn]

Just watched it... superbly delivered, makes the official story look totally false. Amazing to think the effort that black ops teams went to in order to pull this off.