The real problem with the historical accuracy of this movie was that instead of it being based off the very real character that did live, being Artorius Castus, they fused him together with another proclaimed Arthur inspired legacy, being Riotamus. Artorius didn't live in 500 AD, more like 300 AD, which would mean he never fought the Saxons.
Must admit, it is a great movie no matter what! :) :) :)
Movie was a piece of shit bad plot. Also they claimned it was historicly accurate, it wasn't in fact Excalibur with guys in 15th century armor was more historicle.
gaafe film
timocool66 1 year ago
lol every movie historical movie that Hanz Zimmer does has same music in some spots.awsome dude tho
Herpkid56 2 years ago
my name is ARTHUR..
Goodpsy 2 years ago
@Goodpsy stupid name
dumbnetworks 1 year ago
milyen rossz fordítás..../what a bad translate...
neomonitors 2 years ago
i love this movie so much,but i have the version where bors dont calls his other kids bastards. i miss that line lol
Y2CJ3600 3 years ago
Great vid!! 5/5**
KnightsOfArmour 3 years ago
es una mierda
geauldo 3 years ago
nice video....:X:X
inelas 3 years ago
nice video....:X:X
inelas 3 years ago
is this story real
our is it fake like a plASTIC bOob
but i kind like this movie
prewien7 4 years ago
this is a drmataisation of the truth as they know it
altro43 4 years ago
it's great!!!
leviathian34 4 years ago
king arthur is soo gorg n hot
lorry336 4 years ago
LMAO - They changed that last bit
Lancelot: There's a large number of lonely men out there.
Guinevere: Don't worry I wont let them RAPE you...LOL That's what she says in the DVD I watched I remembered it cause it was the funniest line...LOL
frankwallace36 4 years ago 5
good but could u put up a better quality vid!
Kahlan01 4 years ago
that was a great movie, and Clive Owen as King arthur ummm....just hot and sexy warrior
agie5 4 years ago
this was a very good movie, I highly recommend it, historically accurate or not
enfieldroxursox 4 years ago
well if you're content to not dig too deep, you can enjoy the movie. I agree, it's not historically accurate, but it is a good movie.
WanderingChild1870 4 years ago
The film claims to be historically accurate, it could have done with some more realism and research.
F3YR3 4 years ago
The real problem with the historical accuracy of this movie was that instead of it being based off the very real character that did live, being Artorius Castus, they fused him together with another proclaimed Arthur inspired legacy, being Riotamus. Artorius didn't live in 500 AD, more like 300 AD, which would mean he never fought the Saxons.
Must admit, it is a great movie no matter what! :) :) :)
sqwishdabug 3 years ago
yanks!! check the real history not just wikipedia. u r wrong...
sitoto 3 years ago
Movie was a piece of shit bad plot. Also they claimned it was historicly accurate, it wasn't in fact Excalibur with guys in 15th century armor was more historicle.
deligthelf 4 years ago
what do you know about movies,this movie was tight
topsycool 4 years ago
they didnt make arthur as "godlike" as they should've in this movie still though great film
HKStwinturboz 4 years ago
I love king arthur!
Luinnen 4 years ago
awesome movie, but bad quality trailer you've got here :(
YesLedZeppelin 5 years ago
Magyar betűk!!!!Igeeeen!!De megörültem ennek!!!Isten áldja a Hazát!!
Dhomen 5 years ago
I wanna see this so much! ^.^
weirdLil 5 years ago
Directors cut was a bit better, didnt really like the cinema cut
scotsocool 5 years ago
i love the movie!!!! but i hate the story!!! what abour the romance of lancelot and gunieve????
lauraleahu 5 years ago
yeah, the story ended befor it began. pity!
PumpkinSoup85 3 years ago
I have see movie and is rely good...
Haylie93 5 years ago
so good
queenfire 5 years ago
I really wanna see it!
StrangeBean 5 years ago
i luv this movie.
wickeddragongoddess 5 years ago