Added: 4 years ago
From: tshoebat
Views: 8,913
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (557)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Do you even understand what you are arguing against, sounds like you know nothing about NATURAL SELECTION. Read legit sources of information. Not Christian fundamentalist websites.

  • i know f-all, but i know the earth and the universe is defo not millions of billions.

    the rest.. well... he's got to be trolling us. no way could he actually back what he's saying

  • Comment removed

  • This video just made my IQ drop! What an idiot! Im amazed you can use a computer!

  • Another reason why there is no god. He wouldn't have made someone this stupid.

  • @MrAKjosh that comment is full of win

  • Plant fossils are rare because plants tend to decompose after they die. What is more common are plant impressions.

  • The IQ is low with this one!!

  • Geoscience Research Institute, the official institute of the Seventh-Day Adventists. Funny, but Brigham Young University archaeologists tend to be the only ones that even pretend to back up the Book of Mormon. Kind of the same relationship of your expert.

  • all who say that evolution is impossible is a pile of manure

  • ''from the perspective of Creation'' Then it does not matter if he is a scientist or how many degrees he has, he is not doing science any more.

  • Has he done any publishing on peer review?

    And I might ask have you checked on the data of that one book?Or will you just gull down what one author said?

    It can produce mistakes but it can also enhance the function.What's the point?

  • @WWFISNOTWWE Er, I was being very sarcastic my friend. I am a naturalist with no need for deities, christian or otherwise. I can only respect that which is deserving of respect and silly superstitions do not qualify, sorry. Science requires learning, intellect, observation, and a lot of work; THAT is worthy of respect. Blind faith in untenable and unsubstantiated concepts is not.

  • THATS WHY DINOSAURS STILL WALKING AROUND xD

  • @JungleJargon It so so good to see someone who understands the Truth! The Great Godess Gaia created us in Her image to celebrate life and all of Her creation. These ignorant scientists and christians all refuse to see the Truth of Her ways. Blessed be Brother!

  • @JamesTheMadProphet Im a christian, but i respect other peoples beliefs. And christians believe god made us in our own image. So were not that different.

  • "millions of billions of years old, as evolution claims" seriously?

  • Comment removed

  • HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  • This video is so dumb that it doesn't warrant a response. Duh! I just responded :/

  • poor christian like mankinds slow brothers, 

  • "When the sperm and egg unite, this new creation is a single-celled organism. Within hours, this single-cell divides and multiplies more rapidly than any other species. 4 weeks later, the embryo begins to develop gills mimicking aquatic life. A few weeks later, it develops lungs and a tail with reptilian appearance. From there, a mammal is recognizable and then on to a primate form. It then sheds its lacuna which is the embryonic fur. And at last, shows the characteristics of a human child."

  • "Natural selection can only select what is organized by the genome and nothing else is able to ever reorganize the genome other than the genome. Mutations reorganize nothing".

    You got it wrong. Mutations are random changes in the genome, due to weaknesses in the construction of the DNA. Natural selection then work on those random mutation and select those who are the most beneficial.

  • The reason that there are no fossils of the plants the herbivore dinosaurs ate is because plants are 100% biodegradable. Where do you think oil comes from, as well as other mineral deposits found in the layers of earth. Also, here's the big one. Plant life didn't die out because they are not as complex as animal life. Plant life changed and "evolved" to adapt to the different weather changes. Plants die, decay and become nutrients in the soil for new plants...hence, no fossil record.

  • LOL, so the lack of plant fossils proves there were no plants there? Mmm, maybe they DECOMPOSED? Why would there be fossils of plants that died on or near the surface under only a few atmospheres of pressure...

  • OMGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG IDIOT

  • man.. I don't even know what to say.

    I was going to try and form a cogent rebuttal, but then I realized just how far my IQ dropped after watching this.

  • At least finish school before making stupid videos. I finished medicine, and your words are one of a 10 y.o. to my ears. I do not wish to insult you man, but grow up, see the truth, evolution is so obvious, you live it everyday. If you care to know more, just ask.

  • How can a theory never exist? The fucking title of this video proves your an idiot.

  • Roth used a version of arguments in his testimony in McLean v. Arkansas (which struck down the Arkansas Balanced Treatment for Creation-Science and Evolution-Science Act), where he testified in support of the scientific merits of creationism, but admitted that "if you want to define 'science' as testable, predictable" then creation science is not really science.

  • evolution is a dumb idea. every respected researcher can disapprove evolution as a hoax, but the evidences are kept away from the masses. why?don't ask me-maybe because science is in 80% held by satanists, who use it for their purposes.....

  • @krscanin1 holy conspiracy theory

    Batman, i didn't think your super power was to throw large amounts of shit from your mouth!

  • @SpyGuysX hahaha, nice one XD

    but...

    IT'S TRUE

    every respected scientist can easily dissaproove theory of evolution. but the ''material'' can't reach the masses. wonder why?

  • Secondly, Jesus as a man roaming the world, had indeed been documented, but the great deeds he did, and the bible (which is the narration of his life), were written long after his death. The documents talked about a man, a simple man, never of a demi-god doing godly things, those things were created to "empower" Jesus. I respect the man, and his power of peace as i respect Gandhi, but I do NOT make him some kind of god. Jesus is just another good man, who's cause if being used for evil.

  • @krscanin1 Wow, and how the fuck did you get to that conclusion? It sickens me. We worked so hard to give you people proof of where you came from, and you repay us like this? I worked on carbon dating and other dating methods, the earth has been PROVED to be 4.5 bil years. Accept it, it's scientifically proven. Evolution had been proven so many times, and I have studied it so much, that I grow tiered of giving literature advise, but please, stop insulting our work, Evolution is true.

  • @cyberJamilonc hmmm. interesting. you say evolution is true? if you are really a scientist, then you van proove God's existence. It has been done, it's easier then proove evolution. Yo think Darwin was a genious? Think again!!!!

    You can proove anything-anything. You just need to ''skip'' some ''parts'' or just ignore parts of research. How can you say, that evolution is true, when you really don't know what it represents. Do you know it?

  • @krscanin1 "every normal independent human mind disagrees with theory of evolution" You owe me a new bullshit detector. You made my old one explode.

  • @TomFynn i'm happy i could help :)

    no, really, that is ancient theory. it's like believing earths is center of the universe or is flat or is rotating around the Sun in steady positioning(as you know, they travel through space, so the path is more complex, then just oval one)

  • @krscanin1 WTF?

  • @TomFynn i just say, if we want to survive as a race, we totally must destroy evolution theory, because times are coming, when people would be killed, just because of the theory

  • @krscanin1 Hop over to Walmart, they have tin-foil hats on offer.

  • @TomFynn thanks, you're brilliand :D

    i'll do that

    i must say, i thought that people are stupid, but are not!

    idea of idiocracy...hmhm hm... i mean evolution ....(silly me) is rejected by even more people, then you would admitt.

    it's nice we are beginning to think with our brains, and not our heart :D

    i hope you find the truth, i found

    PS: all people are people, only culture is parting humans, all else is the same

  • @krscanin1 Learn to form intelligible sentences.

  • @TomFynn np

  • Sorry man, I sent the comment to the wrong person the first time.

  • @krscanin1 Proving that someone (god of allah or whatever) created the universe is still ahead if science, but that doesn't mean it is impossible to reach. God has not been proven real yet, it's still a myth. Science has guided us so far, and got us as far as the moon and mars. Evolution has been proven so many times, it is not a theory anymore, u ppl just to call it that to make ourselves feel better. In science, u never skip a step or two, it is either right or wrong, ur "god", is wrong.

  • @cyberJamilonc tehy prooved in america that white kids are smarter then black kids y a third. how?

    they manipulated with samples-use a white kid with good education and wealthy familiy, and a black kid who was raised in the ghetto-manipulation of samples.

    who the fuck stops a scientist to conceal something? his moral? what? by the thory of evolution, he can do whaever he can, because only strong ones survive!

    who the fuck stops him to do that? who?

  • @krscanin1 With ur logic I could prove ur a lobster that lives underwater, u make no sense at all. Evolution had been proven by countless amounts of research, and data, that never skipped a step. Stop living 2000 years ago, come to the present. Jesus is a myth, and it has been proven the first copy of the bible was written a few years AFTER his death, so there goes Jesus too, another lie of the human mind :)

  • @cyberJamilonc let's say jesus was a mytho, ok, bible is dumb book, evolution is true, we must be in total narchy. ok. but what about 30 book, which are not bible, and are saying about jesus's existance? is jesus a myth? you don't believe in everlasting? then idea of 2000 year old sistem is like idea of 200 years old darwinism!

    you are manking no sence at all

    if we must evolve, then you must dump theory of evolution, or? explain please

  • @cyberJamilonc Carbon dating, DNA footprints, and many more tools that are verifiable by any man (if he knows a little logic, and if he finished some kind of university), have verified that Evolution is the answer to our question. We have evolved from simple single cell organisms, to what we are today, though natural selection, or to put it simply "the strong and it survive". It is a simple concept yet you refuse it, and think yourself superior in inferiority.

  • @cyberJamilonc i don't think that evolution never existed. i am just saying that darwin's evolution never existed. darwin waas an pagan idiot. and if you say jesus was a man, you are lieing. every religion saying jesus was a man is satanic. every single one. it's that simple. bible was written by apostles, so it must have been written after his death. we live in democracy. i believe Jesus is God. you can't convince me another way, whatever you say. but i'm warning you: darwin-fool

  • @krscanin1 Ha, I did it, I got that tick of a creepy religious out of you. You are a creep of the lowest kind, insulting, trying to show yourself "democratic", then threatening... A typical religious fanatic. Jesus is just a MAN, and the apostles are LYING. I don't see any evidence to the bible, it is full of shitty lies, and no proof or tools that would help my life, a simple creation, by simple people, for simple people. I know I can't talk to a fanatic, don't worry.

  • @cyberJamilonc as you wish. i see you are shallow. bible is not shallow, as you see it. explore hidden meaning behind many stories and sentences. and yes-bible helped billions, but it can't help you? are you something special? a new man? evoluted?

  • @krscanin1 And lol, if Darwin's evolution is not true, what evolution are you talking about? There is overwhelming evidence, from chemical dating, to biological DNA footprints that show that we EVOLVED from another species. Why can't you just accept the truth, the FACTS? At least document yourself before talking about something like this. Go to a library, and read some research, and if then you don;t find evidence for evolution, I will be with you, but "just because I say so", is not proof.

  • @cyberJamilonc there is simple method of showin it. read what darwin says about turks

  • @krscanin1 "every respected researcher can disapprove evolution as a hoax"

    Newsflash: Kent Hovind is not a respected researcher.

  • @TomFynn every normal independent human mind disagrees with theory of evolution. every one. are you thinking for yourself, or are thoughts put into your mind without you even realising it? if anyone believes in balance, evolution is anti-balanced theory. why? what do you think why?

  • @TomFynn

    inmate jokes aside He's not even a researcher.

  • i have 47 xxy chromos ...

  • How many hours have we debated with eachother about this shit? How many youtube videos that could have been HILARIOUS didn't happen because some dipshit wanted to post diagrams and questions with stupid indian dance music? You people should be grateful, a few hundred years ago we were slaughtering eachother over this topic, Christian or Not. It's like knowing that Yellowstone could explode at any moment. Everyone knows....NOBODY TALKS ABOUT IT.

  • And Halo? When the lights go out, we will find out what happens. All of us. And in those last precious moments we are still here, I GUARANTEE ALL OF YOU, that you will be ashamed of yourself for wasting so much time and energy on something that you cannot change. If you believe in what you believe, than shut your fucking mouth, and fuck your wife. Because if you BELIEVE it, than no one can change it, and their lifelong attacks on your opinion wont bother you. HOLY SHIT!

  • Why can't we just hang out and find out what happens when we die? Im a die hard Christian, but I never bear down on people I run into about not believing what I do. And if I were an evolutionist, I would keep my mouth shut as well. WHY????? Because no one is going to convince anyone to think differently, on either side. As human beings we HAVE to realize that. Im so tired of EVERY party or social gathering I go to turning into a POINTLESS debate. What happened to south park jokes? :(

  • Creationists' agenda: Evolution is wrong! Trust in Jesus! Stop teaching evolution! I want America to be a Christian nation! Stop spreading atheism! Spread the Bible instead!

  • @Casshyr spread your legs

  • @Casshyr Tell the truth, objects did not make or refine what you are.

  • Ridiculous...

  • Evolution is a fact. It happens. The theory of evolution explains how it happens. It's that simple.

    PS Spare us the appeal to authority.

  • Well, there is such a thing as the degradation of dead plants over time. The reason there aren't any fossilized plants for that time period doesn't mean no plants existed there, but simply that no plants became fossilized.

  • lol @ "why the earth isn't millions of billions years old" 1:30. uh huh

  • If humans evolved from monkeys, why are there still monkeys?

  • lol. you're such an idiot.

  • Its a very very rare thing for any type of life to actually fossilize, let alone plants. The conditions need to be just right....lol what do you think you leave organic material of any kind anywhere and its definitely going to fossilize???

  • i don't understand how you atheist can say that everything was made by one atom blowing up, but you still won't explain where this atom came from.

  • @MrSDbomber They don't. That's just a theory.

  • Evolution is the sacred cow of atheists.

    It is baseless, illogical and irrational to even suggest that objects made or refined what you are. Evolution is an insult and a disgrace to science.

    There are close to zero known beneficial human mutations that do not have side effects and yet that is supposed to cause the more than 50,000 of the needed *morphological* changes over a long time to change one kind of life form into being another kind.

    Evolution is absolute nonsense! It is so wrong!

  • @JungleJargon So... "GOD DID IT" is a more scientific explanation. You are kidding right.

  • @SuperBspb Yes, it is much more rational and logical to say that we have a Maker than to say that objects made us.

  • @JungleJargon Okay, if you want to say that evolution is unscientific, you have to provide another scientific theory. "God did it" has zero scientific evidence. I don't understand why Christians try to disprove evolution when most of the best apologists assert that evolution is compatible with Christianity. William Lane Craig, the only apologist that makes any good arguments for the existence of a God, is an evolutionist, because he realizes that disputing evolution is a lost cause.

  • @SuperBspb Lane Craig proves that there is a Maker. The evidence shows there is a Maker of all life forms. There is no evolution because there is no mechanism for evolution. Only the genome ever reorganizes the genome is the genome. Nothing else does. Natural selection can only select what is reorganized by the genome.

  • @JungleJargon O RLY? How come scientists have observed E Coli evolve new traits through evolution. Professor Richard Lenski conducted a twenty year experiment where a group of E Coli was observed in controlled conditions. Recently the E Coli developed the ability to absorb citrate. A trait not found in E Coli. The bacteria was given this trait through a random mutation, the bacteria with the trait were able to absorb more nutrients thus accelerating natural selection. Google it, it's true.

  • @JungleJargon Is that why 99.85% of biologists believe it?

  • @TheSpartanondrugs Biologists are finding it harder to defend evolution all the time. That percentage is not even true anymore.

    Ask a biologist how objects made or refined what they are and you will see they will not be able to answer that specific question.

  • @JungleJargon Biologists aren't finding evolution harder to to defend. Actually, the human genome essentially proved evolution

    Biologists don't try to defend evolution. You do know that the point of science is to disprove stuff.

    If you're interested in learning more about evolution, as you seem to be unaware that the scientific community completely believes in it, I can send you a link to a video containing irrefutable proof of evolution.

  • @TheSpartanondrugs The human genome has certainly destroyed evolutions.

    Biologists can't defend evolution.

    I cannot learn about what does not happen.

    There is no evidence of what does not happen.

    The only physical thing that ever reorganizes the genome is the genome. Nothing else does. Natural selection can only select what is reorganized by the genome.

  • @JungleJargon The genome proved evolution. I'll send you a link.

  • @TheSpartanondrugs All function, working parts and mechanisms always require a maker equal to or greater than the function ordered to work by a preexisting word written in and with the function that the elements were made to have.

  • @JungleJargon Once again, you're completely wrong.

    1) I told you that there was overwhelming evidence for evolution and 99.85% of biologists believe in it.

    2) You said the genome debunked evolution.

    3) I showed you a video showing that wasn't true.

    Then you changed the topic...

    There's a mountain load of evidence, but you don't want to see it.

  • @TheSpartanondrugs Who believes what does not prove anything and more people question evolution than you realize.

    "Videos" do not prove anything.

    If there was any evidence at all, you would have presented it.

    Objects did not make or refine what you are, no matter how you look at it.

  • @JungleJargon Okay, here's the evidence.

    During the human genome project, evolution was largely confirmed. This was due to a fusion found in the human genome.

    You see, intelligent design had a golden chance to disprove evolution. Apes had 48 chromosomes, while we have 46. We couldn't lose a chromosome.

    If we were related, there should be some sort of fusion. There was. In our 2nd chromosome, there was a precise fusion of apes genetics and ours.

    You just don't want to accept it.

  • @TheSpartanondrugs Apes are very different from us and there is no way to get from there to here.

    Evolution is not viable. Mutations are doing nothing but killing us.

    Fusions do not prove anything there are same species that have different number of chromosomes. It is the controlling information that is totally different.

  • @JungleJargon A little piece of trivia for you.

    Look up the word 'ape', and have a look at the wikipedia definition. Ape is a general category that covers the higher, tailess primates. Gorillas, chimps, orang-utans, and humans are all apes.

    The idea that ...."Evolutionists reckon we evolved from apes ... What nonsense!"

    ...is extremely uninformed, and typifies those who mock human evolution, without even having a basic knowledge, of what they are mocking.

  • @o1ooo1o You can be an ape if you want to be, I am not an ape.

    That is a very poor definition of a human being.

    There are no beneficial human mutations that have no side effects.

    That means there is nothing for evolution to act on and it means there is no evolution.

    We are going extinct because of mutations.

  • @JungleJargon Wow, so your a biologist now? Your logic exceeds me. You were an ape, you became homosapien and when you die, you will vanish, there is no god, or heaven. Did you ever read some research on evolution? You know like BOOK, research? Just the bible then? Yeah thought so.

  • @cyberJamilonc Address the issues.You proved nothing.

    Objects did not make or refine what you are.

    You cannot assert things without having a basis for what you are saying.

    Your entire belief consists of baseless assertions, assumptions, speculation, conjecture, imagination and illogical, irrational fantasy.

  • @JungleJargon Ok, so if u don't know where u came from, just chuck it up to some thing, and call it God or Allah, or whatever, that is what ur doing. Then convince urself ur right by condemning atheists, and hating them? It doesn't make any sense. Evolution is a simple concept, that has been proven on so many scales, that it is tiring to keep given you people citations, just for u to crap all over the work of great scientists.

  • @cyberJamilonc I do know where I came from, there is a preexisting word written in and with the function that most of the most common elements were made to have that made every physical thing that I am.

    I know that all function working parts and mecanisms that are organized always have a maker equal to or greater than whatever is made to work.

    I know the Maker of the function of hydrogen made the entire universe consisting of hydrogen and everything in it.

    I love the truth.

  • @cyberJamilonc You need to understand that everything you are saying is all based on numerous false assumptions. You never learned any good information.

    Evolution is an insult and an embarrassment to science. It is not even close to being almost true. It is all false. There are no equations supporting it.

    Natural selection can only select what is organized by the genome and nothing else is able to ever reorganize the genome other than the genome. Mutations reorganize nothing.

  • @JungleJargon Lol, you are one of those ppl that represent stupidity, what I am saying is based on facts, that were studied, and proven. Your god, great goddess Gaia or whatever you were talking about in other comments, where the fuck does that come from, prove it to me. Science is not a sect, it is a use of logic to determine something, it is the use of facts. Facts cannot be refuted. Mutation naturally selects, and keeps the healthy genes, that was proven, and it's not a false assumption.

  • @JungleJargon Please stop commenting like you know anything about science, we don't "believe" anything, we "know" things, because they were theorized, and then proven. That's the beauty of science, compared to stupid religion. Fuck religion, I don't respect it, or ppl why believe in it, they bring nothing good to this world.

    Evolution is simple, a child could understand it, what the fuck don't you understand about it? It is a simple system, of selection, that refines itself, makes itself better.

  • @JungleJargon Second, stoop talking about genome like u even know what it really means. Mutations are a simple change in the genome, to make it better, to make it more efficient, or to simply patch a mistake in it. A mutation is nothing in itself, it is a simple "software update" (to dumb it down) if you will, of the genome. Natural selection here is the factor that oversees that mutation, puts it in balance with nature, with what the animal/plant needs, and sees if the change is good or bad.

  • @JungleJargon If the mutation, the change, is not very good, it is discarded, this means a SELECTION has been made. I know ur skull is too thick to even wanna try to understand, but if u wanna know more, just ask, don;t pretend u know something. Your comments r based on suppositions. Facts are all science cares about. Don't we all?

  • @TheSpartanondrugs Maybe you need to go look at the chromosome table and see how how many chromosomes we have doesn't mean anything!

    Please tell me what how many chromosomes something has has to do with anything? Are you saying the more we have, the more evolved we are? What are you getting at?

  • @Awake4Truth I'm saying the precise fusion of our chromosomes proved evolution. The amount of Chromosomes difference between apes and humans as a golden chance to disprove evolution (you can't just lose a chromosome during evolution). But, a precise fusion was found between ape genetics and ours in our 2nd chromosome.

    The proof is the fusion. It's a fact. Evolution is proven.

  • @TheSpartanondrugs Ah, so are you saying how many Chromosomes we have shows what we are close to as a relative? Is that right?

  • @Awake4Truth No, the fusion shows our relatives.

    It is actually biologists (like kenneth miller) who are talking about how that proves evolution.

    Biologists themselves say this.

  • @TheSpartanondrugs How is there proof that any were fused together? Because humans have 46 and apes have 48?! I don't understand, please explain that to me? I mean tobacco plants have 48 chromosomes. In your logic does that mean tobacco is related to apes?! Do you see why I'm confused in your logic?

  • @Awake4Truth Yes, I do.

    But it has nothing to do with the number of chromosomes. I shouldn't have mentioned that as you don't seem to understand it.

    No, it was the genetic coding that proved it. The number of chromosomes could've only changed if there was genetic fusion, which there was.

    Tobacco plants don't have a chromosome that has a fusion with the same coding as apes in it.

    We do.

    I didn't come up with this. It is heavily regarded by biologists as proof of evolution.

  • @Awake4Truth Lol, it is not the number that counts, but it's content, go read some biology before talking shit.

  • @cyberJamilonc Who's talking shit? I was merely asking for an explanation...

  • Congratulations you have taken the first step to knowing things. It is called a scientific question. Next step is to take a university course and ask a professor or wikipedia or JFGI. ^^

  • facebook. com/creationistssuck for evidence for evolution for all atheists :) check it out - I'm not afraid to say there is a clash between faith and science

  • This ignores the fact that some strata layers are very fine, not something that could be caused by a turbulent flood. It also ignores the fact that the fossils are sorted in the layers from primitive life forms to complex life forms. How could a flood do this? Plants are sorted from primitive to modern forms, there are no modern mammals in layers older than the Quaternary and Tertiary periods, no trilobites ever found above the Permian period. How does a turbulent flood explain this?

  • Animals migrate over large distances. Places where there are no plants will have higher death counts than places that have plentiful plants, where life is plentiful.

  • Dumb ass, there could be a number of reasons. Example 1: Plants were eaten up by dinosaurs thats why theres no plant fossils.

    Example 2 These animals could be migrators like wilderbeasts. They could have been travelling through an area where they were attacked or died along the way.

    Example 3 Changing climate could have an effect on plant biology. Remember that there has to be a set of specific conditions to make plant fossils in the first place. Plants could have just died without fossilising.

  • @Daemonicfoxx That's not what they are talking about anymore.I heard of the bacteri finding in the past and all that stuff.But what Im talking about is real live aliens. Green man in UFO's, is what they are saying now. Go watch this here on youtube ""Aliens and the creation of man."" And they are not talking about bacteria.

  • If you're trying to make a serious argument you should probably actually understand the material you're discussing first. "The earth is not millions of billions of years old like Evolutionists believe."

    The earth actually is 4.6 billion years old, and that was discovered by GEOLOGISTS, and they don't believe that the Earth is that old, they know the Earth is that old.

  • There are plants found from that era but they are very very rare. What parts of the dinosaurs can we find? The places where the bones HAVE been, not the actual bones.

    Plants have no or very small amounts of substances that could become a fossil or similar.

  • If you really want to know where all the plants went, check at your local gas station. Plants deteriorated and turned into oil retard, that's why there are fewer fossil remains for them.

  • Ariel Roth is a creationist. How then could he believe in evolution? The two are mutually exclusive concepts.

  • plants are mostly SOFT tissues. it is rare to have soft tissues fossilize. and 90 of mutations are neutral.

  • So if I were to dig up the skeleton remains of a relative that lived 400 years ago, should I find their last meal?

  • "millions of billions of years old, as evolutionists claim." LMFAO

  • @youtubian2500 If im not mistaken their is 6.6 billion humans on earth. If Aliens were around way before man and are super advance. Don't you think the skies would be flooded with UFO's flying around at all times?Their would be way more aliens in space then humans on earth. Yet no real evidence of an actuall alien or any intermediate forms of evolution.You will die and will never see a any of these two things.You will see numerous amount of fake UFO's created on computers, but never a real one.

  • @Ratacon2004 supposedly... >.> or the aliens could be invisible... or just avoiding us because we are a really destructive race

  • Nice Job....of course no one can answer any of your questions.

  • @rorymacrobert Don't worry im not here to convince you of anything. Im pointing out fact been shown on T.V. If you dont believe me go and yotube it. Pleanty of people have uploaded this video that's been shown on T.V. Acient Aliens And The Creation Of Man..........Bahahahahahaha, you athiest are killing me with laughter.

  • @Ratacon2004 I just wanna take you home with me and take care of you. It's funny that people think God is more likely than aliens though.

  • this has to be a troll video, nobody is that stupid right?

  • It happend get over it, grand canyon is a fine example! carbon dateing allso proves that are planet is alot older that 10000 years! man this site is full of strange peaple have nothing better to do with your time on this planet get a girl friend:D

  • Evolution doesn't "exist", IT HAPPENS!!

  • why do you think your dislike bar looks that way

  • If you honestly desire answers to your constant "How is this possible?" questions, the answers are out there in innumerable places. Your local library would be a great place to start. However, if your sole purpose is to stick your fingers in your ears and sing, "La la la, I can't hear you," and continue to put your faith in these woefully non-robust and downright silly creationist arguments, then you are doomed to only believing what you are pre-disposed to believe.

  • You neglect to mention that the Geoscience Research Institute is run by a religious organization, the Seventh-Day Adventist church. Typically this would not be a problem, if the institute were properly accredited, e.g. Pacific Lutheran U, Boston College, or even BYU. However, the GRI is no such accredited organization, and in fact presupposes that mainstream biology and geology are in conflict with the Bible, and hence are false. Such presuppositions render their conclusions irrelevant.

  • You sound nervous...

  • "If you modify a protein then you can destroy the entire cell" You are a scientific genius after deducing that all by yourself (not that it has been known for quite some time now and is taught in 5th grade classrooms) now..... if you had read the littlest most basic literature on evolutionary genetics you would be ashamed of using that as a counterargument to evolution (hint....different organisms have similar proteins that are different in some amino acids), btw, dawkins didnt propose that

  • the ice age and the metor that hit the earth burnt up the plants

  • It's always amusing to see ignorant people splicing together disparate topics to form their conclusions. Sorry kiddo, however I guess it's needs reiterating that the single explanation evolution covers is the diversity of life. It has nothing whatsoever to do with abiogenesis, the age of the earth, or any other creationist paradigm. Btw, the age of the earth has been calculated by roughly 23 independent methods, all coming to the same result; 4.5 billion years.

  • Evolution is fake and the history channel is showing a new video disproving Darwin theory on evolution. You can youtube this video if you dont believe me.Ancient Aliens and the Creation of Man. Problem is scientist still refuse to call our creator God. So they are saying Aliens from outer space made us. Really? Seriously? Common people wake up. If you are going to switch from an "APE" to an "Alien" then you might as well accept the fact God made you.

  • @Ratacon2004 Aliens are more likely than god.

  • @youtubian2500 Their is no such thing as an alien from outer space. You are been punked to believe this system. You have to use common sense and say to yourselve. Why are they changing it to aliens when it was always that we evolved from apes. I mean, the jump is big from an ape into outer space green man in ufo's?Common get real dude.

  • @Ratacon2004 "Why are they changing it to aliens when it was always that we evolved from apes."

    They're not, some scientist say it possible that earth got it first life from space in form of bacteria. This would not change the descent from apes or anything about earth evolution just it biogenesis on our planet.

    You've seem to mistaken one trashy tabloid documentary program which makes massive assumptions based on little fact as current scientific understanding & what atheists believe.

  • Fossils of not everything is preserved. Fossils of plants are not found doesn't mean there were no plant there in the past. If you dig underneath your backyard, I would doubt if you can find fossil of any plants that grew up thousands or millions of year before.

  • Showing lots of colorful pictures and telling us where a certain biologist did what in his life doesn't help to prove your point. PLEASE don't talk about things you don't know ANYTHING about. You're so stupid it hurts.

  • Yes, I'm going to learn a lot from someone who struggles to pronounce 'protoceratops' and quotes Dawkins as having mentioned "Encyclopedia Briticannica".

    Oh, the embarrassment!

  • how do you know it was always a desert? Kansas use to be an inland sea after all. and what kind of dino are you talking about? a 100 ton one? or one less then 1000 pounds? and plants are much more delicate then flesh, and just because they haven't found one doesn't mean they won't ever find one. as for the amino acids, google some of the theories and learn for once >_>, and the one protein, these an one amino acid difference between alot of good and bad proteins,like the blood cells

  • Firstly argument from authority fail. Secondly plants and most organice matter in fact breakdown quite easily, due to some extraordinary events we are lucky enough to have the bone fossils we discover today. Finally you are looking for evidence of vegetation which was most likely destroyed during the extinction event which wiped out the dinosaurs in the first place. Please spend a little more time on your research before you post a list of random skepticisms which offer no alternate hypothesis.

  • I see now whay chimapzees are called ''close relative''......you mokey

  • moron,and idiot because in past day"s all desert"s are alive whit life because then it was not a desert"s.sahara desert was alive in7,500-3,500 years ago

  • wow stupidity at its BEST!! :D

  • Was für ein dummer Bullshit xD Ja komm uns mit Logik zum Thema Ernährung der Dinosaurier und gleichzeitig glaubst du daran, dass alles was existiert mit einem magischen PLOP einfach so auftauchte. Vollidiot <.< Ganz ehrlich, wenn wir menschen dazu ausgelegt sind, so zu sein wie du, ob Evolution oder dein magisches Gequatsche, dann bin ich für eine radikale Ausrottung unserer Spezies. Kann sich kein Mensch antun diesen Schwachsinn <.< Die klammern sich an alle Strohhalme die Christen<.<

  • As for mutations: Note that all animals have a lot of inactive ("junk") DNA that gives plenty of chance to insert new features without removing current features. Also note that small changes to current features will at times be helpful and selected. That is the point of natural selection.

  • First, can you give a reference that confirms that this biologist does not believe that there were planets at the time that the dinosaurs lived? Be sure that you are not merely pulling quotes out of context. For example, if he says that no plant fossils were found, is that not because it is very difficult to fossilize plants?

  • This video should be banned.

    It is promoting stupidity.

    There in no need to provide further proof of evolution; there is already overwhelming evidence.

    It is common knowledge that evolution is real, they teach it in schools.

    Why does anyone believe ancient explanations of reality, fabricated by intellectually immature savages?

    5,000 years ago people had no understanding of science; they didn't want to die, so they created a God to explain the world and let them live forever