I fell in love with America when I saw this. I was an 8 year old English kid (son of a British army NCO) living in Germany (Rheindalen) I had been hit by a car and was in hospital in Waldniel. I watched this along with half the rest of the hospital on TV in the TV room at the hospital. It took me another 25 (33 years old) years to realize my dream of moving to the country I fell in love with when I was 8. I have been here 18 years and have never regretted it for a moment
who's taking Neil Armstrongs' picture, while he exit the LM and make the famous steps for mankind? If Buzz is still in the LM, and Collins is up above? And they missed their orginal landing target? Who set up the camera before Neil got out?
they know 5% of the moons surface and you are goin to assume its all dust? WOW! That would be like Aliens landing in the Sahara desert and thinking fuck this hot dusty shithole lets go a million miles in the other direction and see what we can find. BTW all your arguments fail, send me links to all the hoax stuff being debunked then this will be a laugh to see what your evidence is! Give me something i can watch or study, considering ive seen it all anyway i doubt you have anything new to show.
@bjm351 At all Apollo landing sites, all Surveyor landing sites and all the Russian Lunochod and Sample Return landing sites there was dust. At none of the landing sites there was not dust covering the ground. What had You anticipated to find?
Go to "The Great Moon Hoax - NASA Science", for example. There You can even find links to other sites refuting the "hoaxes". There are MANY sites explaining why the "hoax-evidences" are all misunderstandings or lies. Do a little research!
@bjm351 Well, as long as no one has found anything else than cliffs and dust, it will be only wild guesses to say there are other things on the moon. What do You think there is? What colours would You think is on the moon, and why?
Do You think there is liquid water and an atmosphere? As I said: It's easy to see, even with a quite small telescope, that there is no atmosphere. And, liquid water can't exist in vacuum.
@bjm351 Just as all hoax-believers, You are avoiding to answer "uncomfortable" questions. You stated that we can't see colours unless we are outside our atmosphere. Who has told You so? I repeat: Jupiters red spot was discovered loong ago. We see Mars' red colour with our naked eyes. We have seen that Neptune is blue trough telescopes. And, we have seen A LOT of red, blue, yellow and white stars. Plus MANY other things.
they know 5% of the moons surface and you are goin to assume its all dust? WOW! That would be like Aliens landing in the Sahara desert and thinking fuck this hot dusty shithole lets go a million miles in the other direction and see what we can find.
it doesnt matter if they are lying about `those` rocks or not, the FACT is NASA has stated that for all their `missions` and everything they have done, they only know about %5 of what the moons surface is like. %5. FACT. look it up on the NASA site. So for everyone to assume the moon is all grey dust and shitty rocks they couldnt be more wrong. Tell me, do you think the moon is grey and white with no colour? Do you think it has water or an atmosphere? Do you think it has a core or is hollow?
It's easy to see in any telescope that Moon is just several tones of grey and that is has no atmosphere (the stars don't fade or blink when they disappear behind its horizon).
Water can only exist as ice under the surface, due to the dayheat and the virtually nonexisting atmosphere. Liquid water would instantly boil and evaporate. Even at the night side.
Of Course it has a core. It has gravity as a solid body, and several seismological tests have been done.
@YDDES LOL just showed how smart you are right there! NO ONE on Earth with any whoopdie doo telescope can see the moon exactly how it is as you looking through an atmosphere before you can see it! exactly the same as the astronauts that said the earth is grey and white from the moon, you cant see colour unless your out of earth orbit and then looking at moon. look at the colour pics of it on your hero NASA site its ALL THERE. BTW you still dont get it do you? 5% get it yet?
@bjm351 You are welcome to LOL as much as You want. The astronomers and photographers know much more than You about how our atmosphere affects the light. The moon also has been photographed on distance by spaceships in Earth orbit, and by unmanned probes with no connection to Apollo or NASA. It's several shades of gray.
We can see Mars as red and Neptune as blue from Earth. Jupiters Red Spot was discovered with Earthbound telescopes. That we can't see colours through our atmosphere is just B/S.
No matter what is proved, the idiot conspiracy theorists will never believe, until they are standing on the moon themselves. These morons would have been the ones who burned people at the stake, said the earth was flat and the center of the universe, and claim people live in the television. Einstein: "Only two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." MYTH BUSTERS proved it. ADD triple W to: youtube.com/watch?v=ul87ieOZpaQ&feature=related
And why put something there saying we come in peace for all mankind........i thought the aliens were meant to do that to us!!!! and who where they expecting to find this item???
those spidly little lander legs wouldve snapped!! how big was the lander meant to be? with a couple of astronauts and all that gear it would be crammed. plus they just said astronauts were flying blind and only had houstons instructions, YEH RIGHT!! sure you do fly fucking blind on the moon and the delay in tranmission times wouldve been enough for them to crash. plus they were off course so no one really had any idea where it would land. and they said there was dust. but theres no crater.....
@bjm351 Who said they were flying blind??? They had windows AND radar!
Just try a little harder to understand science and study facts. You may learn how much (little) thrust the LM's engine had during the final moments of landing, and that IN VACUUM, the exhaust gasses spread out so much to the sides, that there is very little pressure on the ground. Also: The dust was a few inches thick. No crater!
@YDDES listen at 1:11 douche and read up on the full story, they were running out of fuel to land, they were off course, plus the delay in transmissions, they couldnt see out the fucking window while flying, yet they landed no worries? load of shit you sheepies are so stupid. like i said many times, yes they went, but not they way they show or tell us, and they certainly dont show what they found. fuckin hell your stuopid i cant beleive i waste my time explaining things to morons.
@bjm351 And, it would be nice to read just ONE hoax-believers comments, that doesn't resort to bad language and namecalling. But, that may be too much to ask for?...
@YDDES my bad. look i dont know what they found i have lots of theories but theyre just that, theories, as no one whos not in the know will never know! theres simply just too much! can never fit every thing in these boxes. i also dont see how people that beleive its a hoax are wrong when all the evidence comes from official NASA sources and its that stuff that has proven to be manipulated before public release. so much doesnt add up, PM if you want to discuss both sides!
@bjm351 Actually, all the evidence doesn't come from NASA. They brought back 853 lbs of moon rocks which have been shipped all over the world and confirmed by the best geologists (As a geologist, I can tell you the difference between earth and moon rocks). Aside from that, there were thousands and thousands of eyewitnesses who watched through telescopes as they landed on the moon. There is NO evidence of a hoax. It is all misleading incorrect science.
@123sambrose considering in 1969 the average householder didnt have a telescope capable of looking that far i highly douybt your claim. its only been in the last 10 odd years that telescopes can get a decent look at the moon and even then you cant see every detail. I have my opinions, you guys have yours. My bad for bein an ass about it though, but nothing will change my mind. My eyes and ears and instincts have never let me down and theres not a lot you could say that will change my mind!
@bjm351 Well observatories and astronomers had telescopes. No they couldn't see them screw the flag in but you could see them fly there. Russian scientists tracked them too. You must know more than the most intelligent physicists, astronomers, geologists, and scientists in the world. It's a pretty lousy way to go through life saying "nothing will change my mind". That shows close-mindedness and an inability to look at evidence and think rationally. My 'opinion' is based on the evidence (facts).
@123sambrose I do know quite a lot actually, good observation! My opinion is too based on FACT so how am i close minded? what bit about what i say bothers you so much? Im more open minded than everybody ive ever come across so dont say shit when you dont know me at all, thats called bein `daft`. Nothing will change my mind on the moon topic, ive seen and done the research, ive got the answers, now im content.! i just love hearing you nasa asskissers that beleive every word they say!! lmao!
@bjm351 I never said you were stupid or necessarily close minded either. It's just that saying "NOTHING will change my mind" sounds like a close minded approach. I'm an atheist but if Jesus comes floating down from the sky, it would change my mind. I'm educated in science. I've been through physics, astronomy, chemistry, calculus, and several geology classes. There's nothing impossible about the moon missions. I'm curious to know what makes it so hard to believe and what the evidence is.
@bjm351 Are geologists, astronomers, physicists, and other scientists from all over the world just lying to us? Moon rocks lack water content and have defects in their crystal structures due to solar radiation. Earth rocks don't have these defects because the solar particles are deflected by our magnetic field. Moon rocks are also 200 million years older than any rocks ever found on earth. The best geologists in the world examined these rocks. 853 lbs. of them! Are they all lying?
@bjm351 Strange. I'm old enough to have followed the manned space programs from the beginning, and I have A LOT of material saved. Both from NASA and several other sources. Newspaper articles, books, scientifical magazines and photos. One of my hobbies is movie special effects (could tell You how every effects scene was done in "2001", "Star Wars" or "Close Encounters", for example).
I haven't seen ONE "hoax evidence" that can't be explained as false.
@YDDES I havent seen one bit of evidence that any of the Moon FOOTAGE is real. Go to a desert, film,then watch that film and notice how much depth you can see. the moon studio is tiny, theres no depth, the backgrounds REPEAT in different missions that are meant to be in different areas, they never show the full landind or full take off so you can see the whole moon, no thruster noise, no dust, no crater, no 1/6th gravity, no stars, no pressurized suits, suits with tears in it, visors up in sun..
@bjm351 "No stars": IF there had been any stars on the photos/films showing the brightly lit lunar surface, it had been a hoax. Too tired to try to explain this totally ignorant notion. Ask any photographer.
1/6 gravity shown in every filmsequence. Missed it?
"No pressurized suits"? Where???
"Visors up in sun". Yes, for short moments. That happens even outside ISS.
The "depht" in the lunar landscape IS much smaller, since the lunar horizon is much closer, and also, the surface is not flat.
kicking rocks, walking by wires, boring astronauts, photos dont match film, flag waving in wind, dodgy rover with umbrella and rubber tires with air, the absolute joke that is the moon liftoff, the fudging of public photos on books etc, secret transmissions, impossibility of getting that LEM to or from the moon with 69 tech, aaaand the list goes on. explain away!!!!
@bjm351 Hope You are trying to joke when You write about "umbrella" and "tires with air". Otherwise You are just totally unbelievable ignorant about everything regarding Apollo. Not to speak of "wind", "wires" and all the other standard "hoax-evidences", that have all been refuted hundreds of time.
Why would they "snap" in 1/6th gravity? And you do have the engineering calculation to PROVE they would snap? May I see these calculations? ;) Or is it easier to just mouth off like a newb and pretend to not look stupid?
@SpreadingtheMuse - i think you made yourself sound stupid enough with that comment!! sorry i dont deal with retarded 12 yr old kids who know nothing, plus i have to explain it on nearly every vid with an idiot like you on it so i suggest maybe watch some more vids, do some study, learn physics then we can talk. ;).
And I dont argue with hoax newbs who watch a 30 sec dork hoax video and pretend that makes them an expert. I TAUGHT physics dumbass. Go look at the movies I upload and then explain to us all why anyone should believe you know jack shit.
Other than astronauts jumping up and soft landing in perfect 1/6th g? Any physicist over the age of 4 can calculate how fast the gravity is by those pics alone.
But that wasnt your point. The REAL moon is 1/6th gravity and we've known that for 400 years. There's not one astronomer or physicist who'll deny it. Its rudimentary science. So if a REAL lem landed on the moon, why would 1/6th grav make its legs break?
Show me the poof of a moon landing. Got pics on a lander maybe? Oh you don't do you, all you have is a dot in a picture, well that's sure does it for me, that prooves your conspiracy that -we really did go to the moon - Out of all the pics taken in recent years by moon mapping sattleites you'd think just 1 pic would show a lander. You Moon-Tards will believe anything. Koo-koo koo-koo
YUP, THEY FLEW IT BLIND IN THE FORGEIN ENVIORNMENT OF THE MOON BUT COULDNT DO IT ON EARTH. FAKE BUNCH OF HORSESHIT. AMERICANS BELEIVE ANYTHING THE PRESIDENT SHITS OUT HIS MOUTH. AMERICANS LOVE TO SWALLOW THEYRE OWN SHIT AND RUB IT IN THEIR EYES.
I think the man on the moon is real, only the footage @ 5:28 is fake. It's like someone filming it....And that cam is not from the eagle, because it's a few meters away from it. I guess the did for "how it must have been look like"
A 18 inch square mirror was left on the moon that is now used to measure the exact distance between the Earth and The Moon as it changes using lasers.
@ 6:56 " It's like much of the high desert of the united states, it's different ". What is that supposed to mean? Let me hazard a guess. He likened the terrain to that of earth then realised he was supposed to be on the moon. A crock of shit. @ 7:28 he is dancing around like a puppet suspended on strings, because clearly he is. @ 8:27 astronots left foot is suspended as if he is being lowered to the ground. Stage-managed hollywood disney bullshit bollocks.
@ChrisArcen You claim to enjoy shooting holes in conspiracy theories with scientific facts yet your channel does nothing of the sort. It appears you struggle to put together a coherent sentence let alone provide any facts. Sorry but I cannot abide stupid people.
@Chev4206 You are a chicken to block people that disagrees with you instead of having a real conversation. You said I was stupid first, so why should you get so upset when I say you are stupid? I know there are a lot of stupid be in the U.S. and You Tube helps prove that there are stupid people in every country!
Like I said, you can't explain why Armstrong's and Huston's talk has no delay of at least 2.5 seconds between transmissions? (RSN_moon.mp3 found in google before touchdown).
There is also no dust on the lunar module while in addition to a huge crater there should have been dust rising and being so light and powdery, the module should have been half buried under the lunar surface dust.
@911LIESdotORG Don't you think that the blast for the engine would have blown most of the lose dust out of the way before the landing pads touched down?
This is so fake why didn't they hit some of the rocks when they were upside down flying blindly and taking instructions on landing from Houston? I don't believe this for one second. The module only lands in two or three inches of dust but later they take this big pole and sink it all the way into the surface of the Moon with just their bodies!
@thy772 They had cameras facing down so they could see what was below the ship. Also the blast of the engine blew most of the lose dust out away from where the ship landed. There is also rock under the dust and the dust is deeper in some spots than others.
Google up this file: RSN_moon.mp3 and listen carefully to how quickly EME (Earth Moon Earth) takes a second or less while it should take at least 2.5 seconds. How could this be possible? Einstein said speed of light is constant talk back from the moon within one second or less? The gullible truth disbelievers may reply!
thing is most you pple are just stupid and believe one thing or another without knowing shit for yourselves,doesn't matter what side,from the comments ive seen most of you are probably morons
this is why there are wars and your being told it's to maintain peace and shit,cause most of you are too fucking stupid
Do you REALLY think they made a spaceship that could make it to the moon in 1969? Look VERY closely on the original. Later after they placed the flag down, it moved about 3 inches. There is no air on the moon. No wind.
@djalexr007 the reason there wasn't any stars is because the atmosphere of earth allows us to see stars. You think you can see a star from billions of miles away.
Going to the moon today would not take much effort considering shuttle technology,the hardes part has always been getting of the earth.Also there are many people who dont understand why photos of waterfalls and creeks in rainforest are a continuous line instesd of natural,does this meen that no one ever visited those places just because they dont understand the principals of photography.
THE AMERICANS LIED TO EVERYONE. Personally, it doesnt make much sense to me, but I saw someone say it on the internet, so it has to be true. I mean, sure, you could say that the government got thousands of people together in an ambitious project that required new technology that produced a liquid feuled multistage rocket taking off, breaking orbits, and traveling with precise trajectorries whilst joining specialist crafts... but the expanation "they made it up" is so much easier to beleive.
We need the moon to get to mars... The hydrogen in the ice is basically rocket fuel, and from the moon we dont have the resistance that we get from the earths atmosphere
@dddronell Who said we cannot send a man to the moon today? man has been there, it is a barren waste land, why spend billions going back, what would be the point?
Funny how the Russians (who were in a bitter cold war and desperate to go to moon first) couldn't find or present one shred of evidence to show the US moon landing was fake. Yet get some conspiracy nut armed with bad science to make a few points, and conspiracy loving gullible fools such as djalex and datzfast swallow it hole and then think it was fake *shakes head*. It's time YOU guys woke up and smelt the truth for once.Fake cause there's no stars?!? learn about photography and resolution tit
USA then started killing all the members that participated on making the movie, cause they where scared they would talk even though they got paid really good with your own money.
They had people live running the media with recorded movie about landing on moon. They wanted the world to think USA is more advance and more powerful. But there absolutely not.
@djalexr007 Buddy We are one of the Most Advanced Countries in the World And Why would we Fake it for Popularity we were racing with the Russians in the "Space Race" So GTFO!~
funny they put the window on the side so the radar could see how stupid is that? it didnt occur to them they could be on the same side? never mind , the moon was a rush job. LOL
As far I know, three astronauts died because NASA was using pure oxygen for pressurization of space capsule when they were practicing. Can do you believe it was accident?...can do you believe that NASA didn’t know the fire equation?, combustible + heat + oxygen = fire.
@iceyflames7 : Excuse me for my grammar mistakes, every now and then, I make involuntary mistakes. I did mean: "Can you believe...". About to trips to Moon, I prefer to wait for missions of other countries...you know.
@starkkid I think both sides have been making mistakes, the common people can´t prove or deny the trips to Moon using these videos because they are not experts, besides, almost all modern theories contain probabilistic inconsistencies, for example: if the Moon has been impacted during "billion of year" by a "rain of meteors", why does the ground of Moon seems so solid and flat?...
Why do the uneducated always ask about the Van Allen belts? The Van Allen belts aren't giant pools or radiation you know. Its not like radiation just hangs out there. The van allen belts are magnetic field lines that shield the earth from solar radiation. They do contain electrons, but electrons can't penetrate a metallic spacecraft.
@jib1000 You are as ignorant as they come. the VAR belts are just a name given by what was discovered back in the 1950's By Van Allen.
"Van Allen belts" are not magnetic field lines. Earths Magnetic field protects our planet from Solar wind. outside of Earth's magnetic field, there is no protection from a space craft against Solar wind.
The belt formation is actually Bo Shock of Solar wind.
@timrocket2008 There is no protection for a spacecraft from the solar wind? I guess technically you're right, but the spacecraft doesn't need protecting. Its the occupants that need protecting, and they are protected by the spacecraft. If a CME comes by then sure the astronauts would be toast, but the Apollo missions were flown during a solar minimum. The normal solar wind isn't too harmful to a human inside a spacecraft, especially since the mission wasn't long.
@AHNAF123456 They have spacesuits, thats how they breathe in space....We have been to the moon a total of 6 times. Do research than find what you want to believe.
Im Only 12 But I Think Its Fake Bcoz In Space There Is No Air But The Flag In The Video Is Flapping I Dont Mind To Be Proven Wrong. Can Anyone Help Me I Dont What To Belive
@yellowbus1323 you are correct, No atmosphere = no air resistance = nothing to stop the flags inertia that was gained from being twisted into the ground. No stars = Daytime on the moon. Van Allen belts argument = It would take 1 month in the VAB to get radiation poisoning. Shadows argument = Shadows are not parallel on uneven ground and converge based on perspective. Light reflects off the ground to illuminate the "dark side" of the astronauts. the "fake moon landing cult" is uneducated.
I believe that the moon landing did happen. I also agree that the government doesn't tell us everything, but only the things that we don't need to know. Of course the Government could be telling us everything, we have to decide to believe it or not, or, they could be hiding very high-tech equipment that is years into the future, they are just waiting to when the people won't say "OMG ALIENS GAVE THIS TO US!" "THEY HAVE TIME-TRAVELLING!" That is... it depends on what YOU believe. I don't.
@mystery19933 If they have time traveling, do they have a flying Delorian? If they do, get marty and doc on the apollo landing instead of these guys. lol jk
@mystery19933 i agree with you i am 100% confident that the moon landing is real the i belive the moon landing was real why would people lie about an acomplishment this big.
and about government secrets once i had my bag stolen and my phone was in it and when i rang up the cops i think they asked me if they had anything like government files in it.
its fake because spacesuit cant randle that much radiation, they all would die before landing in the moon, that is why as today with more tec. no other contry tried to go outside of earth´s protection field, hence no1 did go to the moon, they dont even go to hot spots here on earth, that tiny lunar module is a bad nasa joke, how come grow up ppl can believe it can have any protection against cosmic radiation...
anyone who's willing to believe everything the gov says should at least look into radiation. We didn't see even one star. The russians can't expose someone they are threatened by. The Russians don't run anything NAZI NASA GERMANS/ENGLAND run everything...google 911 fake birds... EVERYTHING IS A LIE
@SherrieLeaLaird Dr. Van Allen himself, who the van allen belts are named after, stated the radiation argument the "fake landing cult" uses is ludicrous. You would have to spend 1 month in the belts to BEGIN to get ill effects from it. The Apollo missions purposefully avoided the thickest parts of the toroidal VA belts. By all means question reality,but you should also question sensationalist docudrama's made by people out to make money(Bart Sibrel = Douche) or gain ratings.
I love reading some of the theories listed here. All are more and more absurd than any hard line evidence that could ever be given that we never went. Heck, just a cursory glance at half the Data (Telemetry etc...) shows we did go. Further, the silence of the Ruskies also kind of confirms is. If we didn't go, the Ruskies would have been all over that and would have made sure the world knew we were lying. We were, after all, locked in a cold war with them.
Most have been some secret CGI software back in '69 to magically generate all this artificial footage....lol The conspiracy theorists hang there hat on trumped up footage from a snot nosed little nerd who probably got turned down by the astronaut corp and decided to try and convince people we never went there. Fuck everyone who doesnt believe....as long as we know it happened who cares what people think.
so ppl are suggesting they went into space, circled the moon a few times then flew back and said they went to the moon...thats the stupidest thing ive heard...it is far more likey they ACTUALLY landed on the moon
this was filmed in a studio, they had to fake these as the astronats were warned off the moon by space aliens who use the moon as a storage facility, in return they gave mankind advanced knowledge such as microchips. Russia was in on it too which is why they never debunked the story.
Sure they could of, that is why there is many flaws in the pictures, accounts, and basically what is possible and what is not. The evidence is overwhelming and will leave any NASA personel jawless because they will respond with no evidence but majestic words how it happened.. blabalba. Those who believe they went to the moon are nothing but sheeps.
"If people decide they're going to deny the facts of history and the facts of science and technology, there's not much you can do with them. For most of them, I just feel sorry that we failed in their education."
@datzfast History writes itself. The United States WON the space race by putting men on the moon first and bringing them home safely. The proof is up there for all to see for the ages, preserved in the vacuum of space.
By the way, I think you are late for your Flat Earth Society meeting.
@Synthetrix Should be completely opposite of that... Education should teach informed skepticism. The bigger the claim, the bigger the proof needed to establish it.
We have more technology now in our pockets and belts (aka cell phones) than what the Apollo rockets had in them. So... why havent i gone to the moon. Why are they now conducting tests on human reactions to the Van Allen belt. Shouldnt they already know the answers?
I fell in love with America when I saw this. I was an 8 year old English kid (son of a British army NCO) living in Germany (Rheindalen) I had been hit by a car and was in hospital in Waldniel. I watched this along with half the rest of the hospital on TV in the TV room at the hospital. It took me another 25 (33 years old) years to realize my dream of moving to the country I fell in love with when I was 8. I have been here 18 years and have never regretted it for a moment
Scootertuner1000 3 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
who's taking Neil Armstrongs' picture, while he exit the LM and make the famous steps for mankind? If Buzz is still in the LM, and Collins is up above? And they missed their orginal landing target? Who set up the camera before Neil got out?
drgil65 3 months ago
they know 5% of the moons surface and you are goin to assume its all dust? WOW! That would be like Aliens landing in the Sahara desert and thinking fuck this hot dusty shithole lets go a million miles in the other direction and see what we can find. BTW all your arguments fail, send me links to all the hoax stuff being debunked then this will be a laugh to see what your evidence is! Give me something i can watch or study, considering ive seen it all anyway i doubt you have anything new to show.
bjm351 4 months ago
@bjm351 At all Apollo landing sites, all Surveyor landing sites and all the Russian Lunochod and Sample Return landing sites there was dust. At none of the landing sites there was not dust covering the ground. What had You anticipated to find?
Go to "The Great Moon Hoax - NASA Science", for example. There You can even find links to other sites refuting the "hoaxes". There are MANY sites explaining why the "hoax-evidences" are all misunderstandings or lies. Do a little research!
YDDES 4 months ago
@YDDES WTF are you on about? ive done my research its you that thinks the craters they landed in represent the whole friggin planet! unreal!
bjm351 4 months ago
@bjm351 Well, as long as no one has found anything else than cliffs and dust, it will be only wild guesses to say there are other things on the moon. What do You think there is? What colours would You think is on the moon, and why?
Do You think there is liquid water and an atmosphere? As I said: It's easy to see, even with a quite small telescope, that there is no atmosphere. And, liquid water can't exist in vacuum.
YDDES 4 months ago
@bjm351 Just as all hoax-believers, You are avoiding to answer "uncomfortable" questions. You stated that we can't see colours unless we are outside our atmosphere. Who has told You so? I repeat: Jupiters red spot was discovered loong ago. We see Mars' red colour with our naked eyes. We have seen that Neptune is blue trough telescopes. And, we have seen A LOT of red, blue, yellow and white stars. Plus MANY other things.
Can You explain that?
YDDES 4 months ago
they know 5% of the moons surface and you are goin to assume its all dust? WOW! That would be like Aliens landing in the Sahara desert and thinking fuck this hot dusty shithole lets go a million miles in the other direction and see what we can find.
bjm351 4 months ago
it doesnt matter if they are lying about `those` rocks or not, the FACT is NASA has stated that for all their `missions` and everything they have done, they only know about %5 of what the moons surface is like. %5. FACT. look it up on the NASA site. So for everyone to assume the moon is all grey dust and shitty rocks they couldnt be more wrong. Tell me, do you think the moon is grey and white with no colour? Do you think it has water or an atmosphere? Do you think it has a core or is hollow?
bjm351 4 months ago
@bjm351
It's easy to see in any telescope that Moon is just several tones of grey and that is has no atmosphere (the stars don't fade or blink when they disappear behind its horizon).
Water can only exist as ice under the surface, due to the dayheat and the virtually nonexisting atmosphere. Liquid water would instantly boil and evaporate. Even at the night side.
Of Course it has a core. It has gravity as a solid body, and several seismological tests have been done.
YDDES 4 months ago
@YDDES LOL just showed how smart you are right there! NO ONE on Earth with any whoopdie doo telescope can see the moon exactly how it is as you looking through an atmosphere before you can see it! exactly the same as the astronauts that said the earth is grey and white from the moon, you cant see colour unless your out of earth orbit and then looking at moon. look at the colour pics of it on your hero NASA site its ALL THERE. BTW you still dont get it do you? 5% get it yet?
bjm351 4 months ago
@bjm351 You are welcome to LOL as much as You want. The astronomers and photographers know much more than You about how our atmosphere affects the light. The moon also has been photographed on distance by spaceships in Earth orbit, and by unmanned probes with no connection to Apollo or NASA. It's several shades of gray.
We can see Mars as red and Neptune as blue from Earth. Jupiters Red Spot was discovered with Earthbound telescopes. That we can't see colours through our atmosphere is just B/S.
YDDES 4 months ago
drink the koolaid tommy,governments don't lie
inthepurelight 4 months ago
No matter what is proved, the idiot conspiracy theorists will never believe, until they are standing on the moon themselves. These morons would have been the ones who burned people at the stake, said the earth was flat and the center of the universe, and claim people live in the television. Einstein: "Only two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." MYTH BUSTERS proved it. ADD triple W to: youtube.com/watch?v=ul87ieOZpaQ&feature=related
AAA9319951 4 months ago
And why put something there saying we come in peace for all mankind........i thought the aliens were meant to do that to us!!!! and who where they expecting to find this item???
bjm351 5 months ago
those spidly little lander legs wouldve snapped!! how big was the lander meant to be? with a couple of astronauts and all that gear it would be crammed. plus they just said astronauts were flying blind and only had houstons instructions, YEH RIGHT!! sure you do fly fucking blind on the moon and the delay in tranmission times wouldve been enough for them to crash. plus they were off course so no one really had any idea where it would land. and they said there was dust. but theres no crater.....
bjm351 5 months ago
@bjm351 Who said they were flying blind??? They had windows AND radar!
Just try a little harder to understand science and study facts. You may learn how much (little) thrust the LM's engine had during the final moments of landing, and that IN VACUUM, the exhaust gasses spread out so much to the sides, that there is very little pressure on the ground. Also: The dust was a few inches thick. No crater!
YDDES 5 months ago
@YDDES listen at 1:11 douche and read up on the full story, they were running out of fuel to land, they were off course, plus the delay in transmissions, they couldnt see out the fucking window while flying, yet they landed no worries? load of shit you sheepies are so stupid. like i said many times, yes they went, but not they way they show or tell us, and they certainly dont show what they found. fuckin hell your stuopid i cant beleive i waste my time explaining things to morons.
bjm351 4 months ago
@bjm351 Yes, they were running out of fuel, but managed to land before it drained.
"Were off course"? They had to override the computer, since it steered towards a small crater.
They saw out the windows, why shouldn't they have done that? Even the camera on this video sees the landing area the whole time!
What do YOU think they found and didn't show, and why do You think that?
You should get some scientifical and technical descriptions of the spaceprograms, instead of just the "Hoax" videos.
YDDES 4 months ago
@bjm351 And, it would be nice to read just ONE hoax-believers comments, that doesn't resort to bad language and namecalling. But, that may be too much to ask for?...
YDDES 4 months ago
@YDDES my bad. look i dont know what they found i have lots of theories but theyre just that, theories, as no one whos not in the know will never know! theres simply just too much! can never fit every thing in these boxes. i also dont see how people that beleive its a hoax are wrong when all the evidence comes from official NASA sources and its that stuff that has proven to be manipulated before public release. so much doesnt add up, PM if you want to discuss both sides!
bjm351 4 months ago
@bjm351 Actually, all the evidence doesn't come from NASA. They brought back 853 lbs of moon rocks which have been shipped all over the world and confirmed by the best geologists (As a geologist, I can tell you the difference between earth and moon rocks). Aside from that, there were thousands and thousands of eyewitnesses who watched through telescopes as they landed on the moon. There is NO evidence of a hoax. It is all misleading incorrect science.
123sambrose 4 months ago
@123sambrose considering in 1969 the average householder didnt have a telescope capable of looking that far i highly douybt your claim. its only been in the last 10 odd years that telescopes can get a decent look at the moon and even then you cant see every detail. I have my opinions, you guys have yours. My bad for bein an ass about it though, but nothing will change my mind. My eyes and ears and instincts have never let me down and theres not a lot you could say that will change my mind!
bjm351 4 months ago
@bjm351 Well observatories and astronomers had telescopes. No they couldn't see them screw the flag in but you could see them fly there. Russian scientists tracked them too. You must know more than the most intelligent physicists, astronomers, geologists, and scientists in the world. It's a pretty lousy way to go through life saying "nothing will change my mind". That shows close-mindedness and an inability to look at evidence and think rationally. My 'opinion' is based on the evidence (facts).
123sambrose 4 months ago
@123sambrose I do know quite a lot actually, good observation! My opinion is too based on FACT so how am i close minded? what bit about what i say bothers you so much? Im more open minded than everybody ive ever come across so dont say shit when you dont know me at all, thats called bein `daft`. Nothing will change my mind on the moon topic, ive seen and done the research, ive got the answers, now im content.! i just love hearing you nasa asskissers that beleive every word they say!! lmao!
bjm351 4 months ago
@bjm351 I never said you were stupid or necessarily close minded either. It's just that saying "NOTHING will change my mind" sounds like a close minded approach. I'm an atheist but if Jesus comes floating down from the sky, it would change my mind. I'm educated in science. I've been through physics, astronomy, chemistry, calculus, and several geology classes. There's nothing impossible about the moon missions. I'm curious to know what makes it so hard to believe and what the evidence is.
123sambrose 4 months ago
@bjm351 Are geologists, astronomers, physicists, and other scientists from all over the world just lying to us? Moon rocks lack water content and have defects in their crystal structures due to solar radiation. Earth rocks don't have these defects because the solar particles are deflected by our magnetic field. Moon rocks are also 200 million years older than any rocks ever found on earth. The best geologists in the world examined these rocks. 853 lbs. of them! Are they all lying?
123sambrose 4 months ago
@bjm351 Strange. I'm old enough to have followed the manned space programs from the beginning, and I have A LOT of material saved. Both from NASA and several other sources. Newspaper articles, books, scientifical magazines and photos. One of my hobbies is movie special effects (could tell You how every effects scene was done in "2001", "Star Wars" or "Close Encounters", for example).
I haven't seen ONE "hoax evidence" that can't be explained as false.
YDDES 4 months ago
@YDDES I havent seen one bit of evidence that any of the Moon FOOTAGE is real. Go to a desert, film,then watch that film and notice how much depth you can see. the moon studio is tiny, theres no depth, the backgrounds REPEAT in different missions that are meant to be in different areas, they never show the full landind or full take off so you can see the whole moon, no thruster noise, no dust, no crater, no 1/6th gravity, no stars, no pressurized suits, suits with tears in it, visors up in sun..
bjm351 4 months ago
@bjm351 "No stars": IF there had been any stars on the photos/films showing the brightly lit lunar surface, it had been a hoax. Too tired to try to explain this totally ignorant notion. Ask any photographer.
1/6 gravity shown in every filmsequence. Missed it?
"No pressurized suits"? Where???
"Visors up in sun". Yes, for short moments. That happens even outside ISS.
The "depht" in the lunar landscape IS much smaller, since the lunar horizon is much closer, and also, the surface is not flat.
YDDES 4 months ago
kicking rocks, walking by wires, boring astronauts, photos dont match film, flag waving in wind, dodgy rover with umbrella and rubber tires with air, the absolute joke that is the moon liftoff, the fudging of public photos on books etc, secret transmissions, impossibility of getting that LEM to or from the moon with 69 tech, aaaand the list goes on. explain away!!!!
bjm351 4 months ago
@bjm351 Hope You are trying to joke when You write about "umbrella" and "tires with air". Otherwise You are just totally unbelievable ignorant about everything regarding Apollo. Not to speak of "wind", "wires" and all the other standard "hoax-evidences", that have all been refuted hundreds of time.
YDDES 4 months ago
@bjm351
Why would they "snap" in 1/6th gravity? And you do have the engineering calculation to PROVE they would snap? May I see these calculations? ;) Or is it easier to just mouth off like a newb and pretend to not look stupid?
SpreadingtheMuse 4 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse - i think you made yourself sound stupid enough with that comment!! sorry i dont deal with retarded 12 yr old kids who know nothing, plus i have to explain it on nearly every vid with an idiot like you on it so i suggest maybe watch some more vids, do some study, learn physics then we can talk. ;).
bjm351 4 months ago
@bjm351
And I dont argue with hoax newbs who watch a 30 sec dork hoax video and pretend that makes them an expert. I TAUGHT physics dumbass. Go look at the movies I upload and then explain to us all why anyone should believe you know jack shit.
SpreadingtheMuse 4 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse and in NO moon vid is there ANY evidence of 1/6th gravity, just so you know! ;)
bjm351 4 months ago
@bjm351
Other than astronauts jumping up and soft landing in perfect 1/6th g? Any physicist over the age of 4 can calculate how fast the gravity is by those pics alone.
But that wasnt your point. The REAL moon is 1/6th gravity and we've known that for 400 years. There's not one astronomer or physicist who'll deny it. Its rudimentary science. So if a REAL lem landed on the moon, why would 1/6th grav make its legs break?
SpreadingtheMuse 4 months ago
but you know that most of the apollo astronauts have eluded now to it never having happened in 1969, right?
guineapiggyman 5 months ago
Show me the poof of a moon landing. Got pics on a lander maybe? Oh you don't do you, all you have is a dot in a picture, well that's sure does it for me, that prooves your conspiracy that -we really did go to the moon - Out of all the pics taken in recent years by moon mapping sattleites you'd think just 1 pic would show a lander. You Moon-Tards will believe anything. Koo-koo koo-koo
orange70383 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DISNEY APOLLO MOON LANDINGS
FILMED
ON
PLANET
EARTH
DeadJesus100 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The moon missions were faked.
politicalforum (dot) com/moon-landing/190138-apollo-moon-missions-were-faked-studio (dot) html
Cosmored 6 months ago
its so fake its funny
The Apollo 11 EVA workload was ............2hrs 03 minutes
The time allocated to photography was........... 28 minutes
The average time to point-and-shoot .......121 photos was 13.88 seconds
chopin999 6 months ago
YUP, THEY FLEW IT BLIND IN THE FORGEIN ENVIORNMENT OF THE MOON BUT COULDNT DO IT ON EARTH. FAKE BUNCH OF HORSESHIT. AMERICANS BELEIVE ANYTHING THE PRESIDENT SHITS OUT HIS MOUTH. AMERICANS LOVE TO SWALLOW THEYRE OWN SHIT AND RUB IT IN THEIR EYES.
MrToiletface 6 months ago
@MrToiletface EVIDENCE OF WHY ITS FAKE OR GTFO, IS YOUR CAPS LOCK STUCK? BECAUSE YOU'RE CONSTANTLY TALKING IN CAPS LIKE YOU'RE RAGING.
iwannabethekid34x 6 months ago
ARMSTRONG THE FAKER SAID
" The earth is the only visible object other than the sun that can be seen from cislunar space"
So Armstrong was the only lying astronaut in history not to see stars in space
FAKE IT LIKE NASA
F
A
K
E
R
S
DeadJesus100 6 months ago
@DeadJesus100 YOU TRY PUTTING 6 LAYERS OF SHEILD AND REFLECTOR ON YOUR HELMET! YOU WOULD BE LUCKY IF YOU COULD SEE ANYTHING!
Doctor699 5 months ago
@Doctor699 is a mental retard :)
DeadJesus100 5 months ago
@DeadJesus100 oh for fucks sake, i dunno why i even bother, goodbye.
Doctor699 5 months ago
@Doctor699 bye
DeadJesus100 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NASA
100%
FAKED
THE MOON LANDINGS
DeadJesus100 6 months ago
I think the man on the moon is real, only the footage @ 5:28 is fake. It's like someone filming it....And that cam is not from the eagle, because it's a few meters away from it. I guess the did for "how it must have been look like"
bravo3000pirate 6 months ago
@bravo3000pirate AGREED
DeadJesus100 6 months ago
@bravo3000pirate It's a hatch with a camera that was opened by Armstrong's string that he pulled....
:D
nitroxide2011 6 months ago
A 18 inch square mirror was left on the moon that is now used to measure the exact distance between the Earth and The Moon as it changes using lasers.
ChrisArcen 6 months ago
@ 6:56 " It's like much of the high desert of the united states, it's different ". What is that supposed to mean? Let me hazard a guess. He likened the terrain to that of earth then realised he was supposed to be on the moon. A crock of shit. @ 7:28 he is dancing around like a puppet suspended on strings, because clearly he is. @ 8:27 astronots left foot is suspended as if he is being lowered to the ground. Stage-managed hollywood disney bullshit bollocks.
Chev4206 7 months ago
@Chev4206 He liken it the the Earth because, that is the only thing he had compare it to. We had never been off of the Earth before.
ChrisArcen 6 months ago
@ChrisArcen You claim to enjoy shooting holes in conspiracy theories with scientific facts yet your channel does nothing of the sort. It appears you struggle to put together a coherent sentence let alone provide any facts. Sorry but I cannot abide stupid people.
Chev4206 6 months ago
@Chev4206 You are the stupid person if you believe any of this conspiracy crap like, the Moon landing was fake, Chemtrails, Sun Orbs,...
ChrisArcen 6 months ago
@ChrisArcen You are American and you call ME stupid? The dumbest people on earth are located around the corner from you. Blocked.
Chev4206 6 months ago
@Chev4206 You are a chicken to block people that disagrees with you instead of having a real conversation. You said I was stupid first, so why should you get so upset when I say you are stupid? I know there are a lot of stupid be in the U.S. and You Tube helps prove that there are stupid people in every country!
ChrisArcen 6 months ago
Like I said, you can't explain why Armstrong's and Huston's talk has no delay of at least 2.5 seconds between transmissions? (RSN_moon.mp3 found in google before touchdown).
911LIESdotORG 7 months ago
There is also no dust on the lunar module while in addition to a huge crater there should have been dust rising and being so light and powdery, the module should have been half buried under the lunar surface dust.
911LIESdotORG 7 months ago
@911LIESdotORG So you have been to the moon and know this?
FPSOWner 7 months ago
@911LIESdotORG Don't you think that the blast for the engine would have blown most of the lose dust out of the way before the landing pads touched down?
ChrisArcen 6 months ago
This is so fake why didn't they hit some of the rocks when they were upside down flying blindly and taking instructions on landing from Houston? I don't believe this for one second. The module only lands in two or three inches of dust but later they take this big pole and sink it all the way into the surface of the Moon with just their bodies!
thy772 8 months ago
@thy772 They had cameras facing down so they could see what was below the ship. Also the blast of the engine blew most of the lose dust out away from where the ship landed. There is also rock under the dust and the dust is deeper in some spots than others.
ChrisArcen 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
excuse me, but this proves what?
boogeyman1967 8 months ago
Google up this file: RSN_moon.mp3 and listen carefully to how quickly EME (Earth Moon Earth) takes a second or less while it should take at least 2.5 seconds. How could this be possible? Einstein said speed of light is constant talk back from the moon within one second or less? The gullible truth disbelievers may reply!
911LIESdotORG 8 months ago
did u see on youtube the vd called :
Apollo 11 Testify for Islam 100%
anashkhss 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Search YouTube for:
Apollo 11 Testify for Islam 100%
Then click on the 1st result : )
anashkhss 9 months ago
its obvious...its fake...hehehe
spykenhower 9 months ago
thing is most you pple are just stupid and believe one thing or another without knowing shit for yourselves,doesn't matter what side,from the comments ive seen most of you are probably morons
this is why there are wars and your being told it's to maintain peace and shit,cause most of you are too fucking stupid
drinkbudyXD 9 months ago
thing is most you pple are just stupid and believe one thing or another without knowing shit for yourselves
drinkbudyXD 9 months ago
If you look at 07.24 to 07.26 you can clearly see the reflection of a studio light, light up the wires. Sorry still don't believe.
ZEROPOINT132 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ZEROPOINT132 "If you look at 07.24 to 07.26 you can clearly see the reflection of a studio light, light up the wires. Sorry still don't believe"
Suit antenna. How do you think they talked to each other in a vacuum?
eventcone 9 months ago
Do you REALLY think they made a spaceship that could make it to the moon in 1969? Look VERY closely on the original. Later after they placed the flag down, it moved about 3 inches. There is no air on the moon. No wind.
Jacob546546 10 months ago
@Jacob546546
Sure... Right now we have the technology to go to mars. It doesn't mean that we are going right now.
About the flag, it has already been explained a billion times in such of way that; conspirators abandoned that argument.
Chop chop... move on...
elpatriotaLX 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Jacob546546 "Later after they placed the flag down, it moved about 3 inches. There is no air on the moon."
Pendulum effect, pal. There is no air on the moon, so it swings like a pendulum. Hope that helps.
eventcone 9 months ago
@marshalllucky seriously? That's the worst theory I've ever heard.
haidawe123 10 months ago
@djalexr007 the reason there wasn't any stars is because the atmosphere of earth allows us to see stars. You think you can see a star from billions of miles away.
haidawe123 10 months ago
@haidawe123 you are pretty much an idiot,don't make assumptions based on what you think,
their official statement was really different :) shit for brains,how the fuck do you think you can't see stars on the moon
drinkbudyXD 9 months ago
i want to beleive its real, but you cant even see the landing sites on google moon.. seems like an important thing to leave out, thats all.
MrToiletface 11 months ago
@MrToiletface You should believe.
natureboytoy 10 months ago
Going to the moon today would not take much effort considering shuttle technology,the hardes part has always been getting of the earth.Also there are many people who dont understand why photos of waterfalls and creeks in rainforest are a continuous line instesd of natural,does this meen that no one ever visited those places just because they dont understand the principals of photography.
simonejslater 11 months ago
THE AMERICANS LIED TO EVERYONE. Personally, it doesnt make much sense to me, but I saw someone say it on the internet, so it has to be true. I mean, sure, you could say that the government got thousands of people together in an ambitious project that required new technology that produced a liquid feuled multistage rocket taking off, breaking orbits, and traveling with precise trajectorries whilst joining specialist crafts... but the expanation "they made it up" is so much easier to beleive.
boonw 11 months ago
wow who gives a fuck about the moon. Like actually, just let the Americans have their glory and shut up about it. Pretty sure Mars is more important.
liverbitz91 1 year ago
@liverbitz91
We need the moon to get to mars... The hydrogen in the ice is basically rocket fuel, and from the moon we dont have the resistance that we get from the earths atmosphere
theskiingarab 1 year ago
Comment removed
THREESIXNINE100 1 year ago
Comment removed
ayanforever 1 year ago
@ayanforever So you admit that Neil Armstrong did land on the moon.
musicbruv 1 year ago
@ayanforever Dude xD.... You know theres Apollo 14 Apollo 15 - 19 i think? 14 every one almost died
flyingmonkey1001 1 year ago
@ayanforever
"WHY WAS NEIL ARMSTRONG THE FIRST AND LAST MAN TO LAND ON MOON?"
Fail.
ytmoog 1 year ago
@ytmoog Because the technology to get humans on the moon has not yet been perfected, and it was never done
GreenPhazon 11 months ago
@GreenPhazon
Exactly which technology do you think was needed?
ytmoog 11 months ago
isn't it funny that we can send men three men to the moon in 1969 but we can't send one person to the moon today.
dddronell 1 year ago
@dddronell Who said we cannot send a man to the moon today? man has been there, it is a barren waste land, why spend billions going back, what would be the point?
musicbruv 1 year ago
Funny how the Russians (who were in a bitter cold war and desperate to go to moon first) couldn't find or present one shred of evidence to show the US moon landing was fake. Yet get some conspiracy nut armed with bad science to make a few points, and conspiracy loving gullible fools such as djalex and datzfast swallow it hole and then think it was fake *shakes head*. It's time YOU guys woke up and smelt the truth for once.Fake cause there's no stars?!? learn about photography and resolution tit
1wibble2 1 year ago
USA then started killing all the members that participated on making the movie, cause they where scared they would talk even though they got paid really good with your own money.
djalexr007 1 year ago
@djalexr007 Tard.
4Locke4 10 months ago
They had people live running the media with recorded movie about landing on moon. They wanted the world to think USA is more advance and more powerful. But there absolutely not.
djalexr007 1 year ago
@djalexr007 And you can't spell to save your ass dickweed.
jeffhickman10 1 year ago
@djalexr007 Buddy We are one of the Most Advanced Countries in the World And Why would we Fake it for Popularity we were racing with the Russians in the "Space Race" So GTFO!~
flyingmonkey1001 1 year ago
Lol nice acting.. Fake.. Look there are no stars!!!!!! Look at the way they move their
djalexr007 1 year ago
funny they put the window on the side so the radar could see how stupid is that? it didnt occur to them they could be on the same side? never mind , the moon was a rush job. LOL
datzfast 1 year ago
this is right i got very proof in quran. if any1 wants it just ask, ill post it!
NefertitiSoulja999 1 year ago
As far I know, three astronauts died because NASA was using pure oxygen for pressurization of space capsule when they were practicing. Can do you believe it was accident?...can do you believe that NASA didn’t know the fire equation?, combustible + heat + oxygen = fire.
Leivinn20 1 year ago
@Leivinn20
"Can do you beleive"
No grammar in that sentance.
iceyflames7 1 year ago
@iceyflames7 : Excuse me for my grammar mistakes, every now and then, I make involuntary mistakes. I did mean: "Can you believe...". About to trips to Moon, I prefer to wait for missions of other countries...you know.
Leivinn20 1 year ago
@iceyflames7 : Excuse me, every now and then my mind deceives me. I mean: can you believe it?.
Leivinn20 1 year ago
@Leivinn20 they killed them.the fucking nasa killed the astronauts
starkkid 1 year ago
Comment removed
Leivinn20 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@starkkid I think both sides have been making mistakes, the common people can´t prove or deny the trips to Moon using these videos because they are not experts, besides, almost all modern theories contain probabilistic inconsistencies, for example: if the Moon has been impacted during "billion of year" by a "rain of meteors", why does the ground of Moon seems so solid and flat?...
Leivinn20 1 year ago
Watching the apollo 11 landing makes me cry.
Ackron 1 year ago
Im smiling here.... and my dog is smiling.
Zoroasterrrr 1 year ago
@MacRief I'm ok... Thanks - by my mom
Michi4110 1 year ago
Comment removed
Michi4110 1 year ago
Comment removed
Michi4110 1 year ago
@MacRief Don't look to me, look to yourself...
Michi4110 1 year ago
@MacRief I'm so...so..sorry, are you angry!!!? whay!? Wowww I know, maibe because your mom, your country and anso you are FAKE...
You don't know about nothing, open your eye litle child.
You are a child and I don´t talk with child ok
Michi4110 1 year ago
i wonder how they got through the Van Ryan radiation belt? magic or miracle?
theghosttownguy 1 year ago
@theghosttownguy It's overrated
MacRief 1 year ago
@theghosttownguy Van Ryan?
piggypolice 1 year ago
@piggypolice hahahaha van allen....oops
theghosttownguy 1 year ago
@theghosttownguy Are you kidding?
Why do the uneducated always ask about the Van Allen belts? The Van Allen belts aren't giant pools or radiation you know. Its not like radiation just hangs out there. The van allen belts are magnetic field lines that shield the earth from solar radiation. They do contain electrons, but electrons can't penetrate a metallic spacecraft.
jib1000 1 year ago
@jib1000 You are as ignorant as they come. the VAR belts are just a name given by what was discovered back in the 1950's By Van Allen.
"Van Allen belts" are not magnetic field lines. Earths Magnetic field protects our planet from Solar wind. outside of Earth's magnetic field, there is no protection from a space craft against Solar wind.
The belt formation is actually Bo Shock of Solar wind.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
@timrocket2008 There is no protection for a spacecraft from the solar wind? I guess technically you're right, but the spacecraft doesn't need protecting. Its the occupants that need protecting, and they are protected by the spacecraft. If a CME comes by then sure the astronauts would be toast, but the Apollo missions were flown during a solar minimum. The normal solar wind isn't too harmful to a human inside a spacecraft, especially since the mission wasn't long.
FAIL for you dummy.
jib1000 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jib1000 LOL so according to your argument, they never got out of the space craft. idiot.
timrocket2008 1 year ago
I like to read the comments to videos like this because the stupid Americans who comment with "hoax" and the such as just so comedic.
redbeast2 1 year ago
Everything is FAKE....!!!!
Michi4110 1 year ago
@Michi4110 Your mom is FAKE....!!!
MacRief 1 year ago
USA is FAKE...!!!!
Michi4110 1 year ago
+ It Was Filmed In Area 51
AHNAF123456 1 year ago
@AHNAF123456 They have spacesuits, thats how they breathe in space....We have been to the moon a total of 6 times. Do research than find what you want to believe.
EJR8588 1 year ago
@AHNAF123456 or walt disney studios!
theghosttownguy 1 year ago
Im Only 12 But I Think Its Fake Bcoz In Space There Is No Air But The Flag In The Video Is Flapping I Dont Mind To Be Proven Wrong. Can Anyone Help Me I Dont What To Belive
AHNAF123456 1 year ago
yes I can help you the flaged waved because the astronauts were trying to plant it after they plant it it stop moving and did not move again.
yellowbus1323 1 year ago
@yellowbus1323 you are correct, No atmosphere = no air resistance = nothing to stop the flags inertia that was gained from being twisted into the ground. No stars = Daytime on the moon. Van Allen belts argument = It would take 1 month in the VAB to get radiation poisoning. Shadows argument = Shadows are not parallel on uneven ground and converge based on perspective. Light reflects off the ground to illuminate the "dark side" of the astronauts. the "fake moon landing cult" is uneducated.
SBwingman 1 year ago
I believe that the moon landing did happen. I also agree that the government doesn't tell us everything, but only the things that we don't need to know. Of course the Government could be telling us everything, we have to decide to believe it or not, or, they could be hiding very high-tech equipment that is years into the future, they are just waiting to when the people won't say "OMG ALIENS GAVE THIS TO US!" "THEY HAVE TIME-TRAVELLING!" That is... it depends on what YOU believe. I don't.
mystery19933 1 year ago 9
@mystery19933 you r a stupid americain . fuckk CNN viewers
starkkid 1 year ago
@starkkid I'm not American. I don't watch the news, too biased.
mystery19933 1 year ago
@mystery19933 If they have time traveling, do they have a flying Delorian? If they do, get marty and doc on the apollo landing instead of these guys. lol jk
benskitv 1 year ago
@mystery19933 i agree with you i am 100% confident that the moon landing is real the i belive the moon landing was real why would people lie about an acomplishment this big.
and about government secrets once i had my bag stolen and my phone was in it and when i rang up the cops i think they asked me if they had anything like government files in it.
Towelman20 7 months ago
I think it's a fake.
boboaspire 1 year ago
its fake because spacesuit cant randle that much radiation, they all would die before landing in the moon, that is why as today with more tec. no other contry tried to go outside of earth´s protection field, hence no1 did go to the moon, they dont even go to hot spots here on earth, that tiny lunar module is a bad nasa joke, how come grow up ppl can believe it can have any protection against cosmic radiation...
TheAluzinha 1 year ago
anyone who's willing to believe everything the gov says should at least look into radiation. We didn't see even one star. The russians can't expose someone they are threatened by. The Russians don't run anything NAZI NASA GERMANS/ENGLAND run everything...google 911 fake birds... EVERYTHING IS A LIE
SherrieLeaLaird 2 years ago
@SherrieLeaLaird Dr. Van Allen himself, who the van allen belts are named after, stated the radiation argument the "fake landing cult" uses is ludicrous. You would have to spend 1 month in the belts to BEGIN to get ill effects from it. The Apollo missions purposefully avoided the thickest parts of the toroidal VA belts. By all means question reality,but you should also question sensationalist docudrama's made by people out to make money(Bart Sibrel = Douche) or gain ratings.
SBwingman 1 year ago
I love reading some of the theories listed here. All are more and more absurd than any hard line evidence that could ever be given that we never went. Heck, just a cursory glance at half the Data (Telemetry etc...) shows we did go. Further, the silence of the Ruskies also kind of confirms is. If we didn't go, the Ruskies would have been all over that and would have made sure the world knew we were lying. We were, after all, locked in a cold war with them.
danschaoticmind 2 years ago
Most have been some secret CGI software back in '69 to magically generate all this artificial footage....lol The conspiracy theorists hang there hat on trumped up footage from a snot nosed little nerd who probably got turned down by the astronaut corp and decided to try and convince people we never went there. Fuck everyone who doesnt believe....as long as we know it happened who cares what people think.
ghartran31 2 years ago
so ppl are suggesting they went into space, circled the moon a few times then flew back and said they went to the moon...thats the stupidest thing ive heard...it is far more likey they ACTUALLY landed on the moon
england2008eigth 2 years ago
this was filmed in a studio, they had to fake these as the astronats were warned off the moon by space aliens who use the moon as a storage facility, in return they gave mankind advanced knowledge such as microchips. Russia was in on it too which is why they never debunked the story.
marshalllucky 2 years ago
its people like you with this fantasy crap that gives a bad name to the skeptics that disbelieve this
Mikeol2006 2 years ago
And your proof?
danschaoticmind 2 years ago
why fake if eveyone saw them take off spend billions just to go i second in the airr ummm
aliskisskiss78 2 years ago
@aliskisskiss78
Hmm let me see, think outside of the box will you.
Neso1991 2 years ago
how would they get those pics of earth if they werent on the moon?
tdawg598 2 years ago
have you ever heard about hollywood before ?
TheMadLeb 2 years ago 2
yes i have but i dont think nasa could have done that in 1970 but mabey now
tdawg598 2 years ago
@tdawg598
Sure they could of, that is why there is many flaws in the pictures, accounts, and basically what is possible and what is not. The evidence is overwhelming and will leave any NASA personel jawless because they will respond with no evidence but majestic words how it happened.. blabalba. Those who believe they went to the moon are nothing but sheeps.
Neso1991 2 years ago
Jack Schmitt said it best:
"If people decide they're going to deny the facts of history and the facts of science and technology, there's not much you can do with them. For most of them, I just feel sorry that we failed in their education."
Synthetrix 2 years ago 22
Comment removed
datzfast 1 year ago
@datzfast History writes itself. The United States WON the space race by putting men on the moon first and bringing them home safely. The proof is up there for all to see for the ages, preserved in the vacuum of space.
By the way, I think you are late for your Flat Earth Society meeting.
Synthetrix 1 year ago
Comment removed
datzfast 1 year ago
@Synthetrix What proof.......I'd love to see some proof.
jhhwingnut 1 year ago
@Synthetrix sounds contrived , probably was.
datzfast 1 year ago
@Synthetrix Should be completely opposite of that... Education should teach informed skepticism. The bigger the claim, the bigger the proof needed to establish it.
CallMeTraitor 9 months ago
well still i want to ask some that SUPPOSIBLY walked on the moon if they did and id have "encouragement" to "help" them tell me the truth
tdawg598 2 years ago
he neve said one small step for man one giant leap for mankind when he was landing which prooves its fake
frederickbremerschoo 2 years ago
LOL at your fuctkarded comment
TheJomogogo 2 years ago
LOOKS FAKE TO ME
TERMINATOR2452 2 years ago
Yeah? You sound like a dumbass to me.
curea229 2 years ago
We have more technology now in our pockets and belts (aka cell phones) than what the Apollo rockets had in them. So... why havent i gone to the moon. Why are they now conducting tests on human reactions to the Van Allen belt. Shouldnt they already know the answers?
lcplharris 2 years ago
yes the apollos coputers were less than our cell phones but they were just giant calculaters....
tdawg598 2 years ago
they still use a cpu in F16 fighters that are less than most new cell phones. Why don't you take a F16 fighter to work?
sawman85 2 years ago
also your not on the moon for two reasons. Reason one is that you don't have the training. Reason two is that your a dumbass :D thank you and