@555GB No, all games are made on PC's. What you meant to say is multi-plats are developed around the limitations of dated 360/PS3 hardware which is true. Which is sad really, because PC hardware has far greater potential in making games with amazing visuals not possible on 360/PS3.
@frank141289 no, 95% of the games ARE MADE FOR CONSOLES and getting ported on the pc.. so they "are made" for consoles which makes them mostly uncompatible to nearly all the advantages of a pc -.-
if they would use cuda in games, the cpu nearly wouldn't be used anymore.. for example, counterstrike source is an old cpu limited game.. if this game could use cuda to proceed everything on the gpu.. the fps would explode oO
@GunnyW14 oh dude, do you think i don't know this (: ?! I mean the gpu will calculate as much as possible, which would make the fps explode because
good new gpu = at least good new cpu*10 @ performance mostly a WAAAAAAY more oO
i know that the cpu is the central processing unit ;) and the cpu is main unit which will give the gpu the orders so the cpu will be always need until we have a system which will be able to use the gpu as the central unit^^
@re4pt0x and what leave all amd/ati cards in the dark. I dont think Nvidia would license the technology to amd sure look at Physx but yeah Alot of it is to do with DirectX as well it kinda makes a mess of things :
@theIrishFooFighter wutt?! sure they wouldn't give them the license, that would give nvidia SUCH a HUGE jump in performance for games like css, such a big advantage which nvidia could make profit with..
amd/ati is a own firm they need to get new, good ideas themselfes, if nvidia would make amd run cuda and physx they would shot themselfs in the foot.. it's nvidias advantage and bonus, why should they share it with amd ^^ ;)
amd only can use physx if you use a seperate nvidia card with it^^
@re4pt0x yeah! I don't think we would need direct X anymore! AMD & Nvidia really should make an agreement on a technology for gamers! Maybe they could make a gamer OS!
I have GT 525M With Cuda Technology
MCVXtreme 1 week ago
that's what i have :D
phanable1 4 months ago
my computer has nvidia cuda but i cant download driver please replay me for helping
Mavnevar 6 months ago
that 1 dislike is by the director of ATI
iwams1 7 months ago 5
NVIDIA FTW !
SuperWildWeasel 10 months ago
CUDA is awesome. Imagine how many CUDA-based games you could play smoothly on an ION netbook.
SonsOfHateSphere 11 months ago
Thought this was going to be a cuda demonstration bit disapointed.
thermalz0mbie 11 months ago
@555GB No, all games are made on PC's. What you meant to say is multi-plats are developed around the limitations of dated 360/PS3 hardware which is true. Which is sad really, because PC hardware has far greater potential in making games with amazing visuals not possible on 360/PS3.
KrazyK1289 11 months ago 2
@KrazyK1289 Hence why they made BF3 to be its best on PC then they are downgrading for consoles.
Mittl33094 11 months ago
@Mittl33094 Amen brotha!!!!!
ownTer 11 months ago
make it run widows and then we can talk
j7x54 11 months ago
prepare for the gtx 590 or the gtx 680.
Madblaster89 11 months ago
@555GB Dude. You just made me cry in shame...
h4xmode 11 months ago
@555GB so true. such a shame.
ibamass 11 months ago
@555GB every game is made it on a pc.
frank141289 11 months ago
@frank141289 no, 95% of the games ARE MADE FOR CONSOLES and getting ported on the pc.. so they "are made" for consoles which makes them mostly uncompatible to nearly all the advantages of a pc -.-
re4pt0x 11 months ago
@re4pt0x i know that 95% of the game are made for consoles but all the games are made it on a pc =)
frank141289 11 months ago
@555GB yeah >.<
if they would use cuda in games, the cpu nearly wouldn't be used anymore.. for example, counterstrike source is an old cpu limited game.. if this game could use cuda to proceed everything on the gpu.. the fps would explode oO
re4pt0x 11 months ago 13
@re4pt0x no, because even with cuda, the CPU is still needed because the gpu isn't general purpose enough to have an entire program run on it.
GunnyW14 11 months ago
@GunnyW14 oh dude, do you think i don't know this (: ?! I mean the gpu will calculate as much as possible, which would make the fps explode because
good new gpu = at least good new cpu*10 @ performance mostly a WAAAAAAY more oO
i know that the cpu is the central processing unit ;) and the cpu is main unit which will give the gpu the orders so the cpu will be always need until we have a system which will be able to use the gpu as the central unit^^
re4pt0x 11 months ago
@re4pt0x CUDA is in Just Cause 2. It's used for the water.
LLOYD19851012 11 months ago
@LLOYD19851012 and heatwaves in the desert.
SonsOfHateSphere 11 months ago 3
@re4pt0x and what leave all amd/ati cards in the dark. I dont think Nvidia would license the technology to amd sure look at Physx but yeah Alot of it is to do with DirectX as well it kinda makes a mess of things :
theIrishFooFighter 11 months ago
@theIrishFooFighter wutt?! sure they wouldn't give them the license, that would give nvidia SUCH a HUGE jump in performance for games like css, such a big advantage which nvidia could make profit with..
amd/ati is a own firm they need to get new, good ideas themselfes, if nvidia would make amd run cuda and physx they would shot themselfs in the foot.. it's nvidias advantage and bonus, why should they share it with amd ^^ ;)
amd only can use physx if you use a seperate nvidia card with it^^
re4pt0x 11 months ago
@re4pt0x yeah! I don't think we would need direct X anymore! AMD & Nvidia really should make an agreement on a technology for gamers! Maybe they could make a gamer OS!
Thet3 8 months ago
Is CUDA supported by my RIVA TNT2?
GruntyStudios 11 months ago
@GruntyStudios negitive
cal920c 11 months ago
Nice! =]
roniwf10hotmailcom1 11 months ago 18
:D
othman626 11 months ago