Added: 2 years ago
From: ChannelFireball
Views: 6,702
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (11)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Should've marked the Woodcrasher on the second last turn and bashed him to one. He has one card in hand and even if it's land, it's not enough to kill you and you still have a bunch of burn spells left to draw.

  • it's good to see pro's make mistakes 2

  • I agree, It should have been a mulligan. You drawed out of it pretty good though. Could've been worse.

  • The last two drafts you've played Mark of Mutiny and it has seemed to be a dead draw in 75% of situations.

    I think that Ravager would've been much better most of the time.

  • On the other hand you would have the goblin and the geopede. On his turn he would have killed your geopede but without attacking (only 2 life remaining) as he would have needed the baloth to stay alive. Next turn you play the boar and you have a real chance to win the game if he does not play anything.

  • You should have controlled woodcrasher with mark of mutiny, then play a land and bash with everthing. He would be forced to block the Giant and the Geopede and thus, he will only have left a 5/5 woodcrusher... [to be continued]

  • Probably I would have played Geopede, land, and Mark the Geopede and swing! 2/2 first strike is good and 4/4 on the offense is great.

  • You could have sided in Molten Ravager and Zektar Shrine. They would have been good blockers and sometimes attackers against his beefy allies.

  • I wouldn't have kept that hand. But then, I often mulligan too aggressively... But 5 lands seems too much in this aggressive of a deck.

  • Though luck there LSV

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more