Hey mate, hows it going? you like football manager games right? i found this cool one online footy-manager com its very similar to the football manager game. check it out. its pretty cool actualy.
In this video it is hard to see at the angle. Law 11 states the player needs to be behind the ball or 2nd to last defender. Its close to say the attacking player was behind the ball at the time it was passed. I would count the goal.
it was offsides because the attacker who scored is past the second to last defender, the last defender being the goalkeeper. and plus it doesn't matter where the player touches the ball if you are offside and the ball is past to you but you receive the ball in an onside position you are still offside. so us buccos2324 go look at the laws of the game again.
He is onsides because according to the laws of the game the player must be:
a. Closer to the goal line than the second to last opponent
b. Closer to the goal line than the ball.
He is level with the position of the ball when it is touched by his team-mate, so therefore it is onsides. Of course, if we had a better, closer angle, it could have been possible that part of his foot or head was closer.
A goal by Dicchio was not counted but it was onside, and the offside goal by Villa shouldn't count so it should be 3-2 TFC. The late goal would never have happened as TFC wouldn't be pressing but would bunker down. I'm not even a TFC fan LOL. To be honest, TFC has turned for the worse, you think they played well in that game. They're really bad now due to half the starters being injured.
Well in the end, it's an exhibition so it doesn't really count. I made the video to make a point in a football forum. Youtube is great for showing vids in forums :P And yes, that was offsides. :P
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey mate, hows it going? you like football manager games right? i found this cool one online footy-manager com its very similar to the football manager game. check it out. its pretty cool actualy.
besly988 1 year ago
In this video it is hard to see at the angle. Law 11 states the player needs to be behind the ball or 2nd to last defender. Its close to say the attacking player was behind the ball at the time it was passed. I would count the goal.
mike4web 1 year ago
it was offsides because the attacker who scored is past the second to last defender, the last defender being the goalkeeper. and plus it doesn't matter where the player touches the ball if you are offside and the ball is past to you but you receive the ball in an onside position you are still offside. so us buccos2324 go look at the laws of the game again.
suematsu89 1 year ago
That wasn't offside, look the ball is already past the offsides line
drake1636 1 year ago
Not offside at all, ball received onside and play is onside when he scores. Look at the camera angle
itbrvilla 2 years ago
He is onsides because according to the laws of the game the player must be:
a. Closer to the goal line than the second to last opponent
b. Closer to the goal line than the ball.
He is level with the position of the ball when it is touched by his team-mate, so therefore it is onsides. Of course, if we had a better, closer angle, it could have been possible that part of his foot or head was closer.
But from this angle I would say he is onsides.
buccos2324 3 years ago
Lol I'm a Villa fan and my girlfriend is from Toronto so I'm not getting involved!
eddyfunkboy 3 years ago 2
It was a Pre-Season friendly..If we played your full throttle you yanks would be toast.
villasyl 3 years ago 2
yanks? Toronto is in Canada you twat
Quickwinklongsstare 3 years ago
who you calling yanks....WE R CANADIANS....and calling TORONTONIANS yanks is a insult...take it back...chump....
TAXX83 2 years ago
not offside, the ball is already passed the defenders so it doesn't matter how far ahead of the ball the player is!
motorikbeat 3 years ago
offside
DZ3PAC 3 years ago
offside
DZ3PAC 3 years ago
If we wantet perfect judgement in footballmatches we would use video judging
WarhammerftwXD 4 years ago
Dichio and Lombardo scored goals and they called them both offsied... plus this one waqs well offside... we deserved a 4-3 win
michaeltfc91 4 years ago
u still played well were not that good in the english prem league lol
myworld1000 4 years ago
2-4, 3-4 u still lost
myworld1000 4 years ago
A goal by Dicchio was not counted but it was onside, and the offside goal by Villa shouldn't count so it should be 3-2 TFC. The late goal would never have happened as TFC wouldn't be pressing but would bunker down. I'm not even a TFC fan LOL. To be honest, TFC has turned for the worse, you think they played well in that game. They're really bad now due to half the starters being injured.
virtute71 4 years ago
@virtute71 Hahahahaha
TommoTheVillan 1 year ago
Well in the end, it's an exhibition so it doesn't really count. I made the video to make a point in a football forum. Youtube is great for showing vids in forums :P And yes, that was offsides. :P
virtute71 4 years ago
Seems to be pretty level, not blatantly offside anyway.
crayzeehorse 4 years ago
his backfoot was level with the defender when the ball was passed ... so its not offsides
davidavfc82 4 years ago
His backfoot? That doesn't mean jack all. It only matters if any part of his body (excluding arms) was ahead of the ball.
crazychessman 4 years ago