Added: 4 years ago
From: virtute71
Views: 4,866
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (23)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • In this video it is hard to see at the angle. Law 11 states the player needs to be behind the ball or 2nd to last defender. Its close to say the attacking player was behind the ball at the time it was passed. I would count the goal.

  • it was offsides because the attacker who scored is past the second to last defender, the last defender being the goalkeeper. and plus it doesn't matter where the player touches the ball if you are offside and the ball is past to you but you receive the ball in an onside position you are still offside. so us buccos2324 go look at the laws of the game again.

  • That wasn't offside, look the ball is already past the offsides line

  • Not offside at all, ball received onside and play is onside when he scores. Look at the camera angle

  • He is onsides because according to the laws of the game the player must be:

    a. Closer to the goal line than the second to last opponent

    b. Closer to the goal line than the ball.

    He is level with the position of the ball when it is touched by his team-mate, so therefore it is onsides. Of course, if we had a better, closer angle, it could have been possible that part of his foot or head was closer.

    But from this angle I would say he is onsides.

  • Lol I'm a Villa fan and my girlfriend is from Toronto so I'm not getting involved!

  • It was a Pre-Season friendly..If we played your full throttle you yanks would be toast.

  • yanks? Toronto is in Canada you twat

  • who you calling yanks....WE R CANADIANS....and calling TORONTONIANS yanks is a insult...take it back...chump....

  • not offside, the ball is already passed the defenders so it doesn't matter how far ahead of the ball the player is!

  • offside

  • offside

  • If we wantet perfect judgement in footballmatches we would use video judging

  • Dichio and Lombardo scored goals and they called them both offsied... plus this one waqs well offside... we deserved a 4-3 win

  • u still played well were not that good in the english prem league lol

  • 2-4, 3-4 u still lost

  • A goal by Dicchio was not counted but it was onside, and the offside goal by Villa shouldn't count so it should be 3-2 TFC. The late goal would never have happened as TFC wouldn't be pressing but would bunker down. I'm not even a TFC fan LOL. To be honest, TFC has turned for the worse, you think they played well in that game. They're really bad now due to half the starters being injured.

  • @virtute71 Hahahahaha

  • Well in the end, it's an exhibition so it doesn't really count. I made the video to make a point in a football forum. Youtube is great for showing vids in forums :P And yes, that was offsides. :P

  • Seems to be pretty level, not blatantly offside anyway.

  • his backfoot was level with the defender when the ball was passed ... so its not offsides

  • His backfoot? That doesn't mean jack all. It only matters if any part of his body (excluding arms) was ahead of the ball.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more