You can gather energy from these reactors much like a fission reactor we use today. Instead of radioactive material you use plasma and fusion to boil water and spin a stream turbine to generate energy. Fission is safer with little radiation and little to no chance of catastophic meltdown, or any melt down for that matter.
While you are checking ... the place to look is Fusion Power Corporation's web site and view the YouTube video "StarPower for Tomorrow" !! This is real FUSION using Deuterium and Tritium. A solution to the energy problem that is real.
While you are checking ... the place to look is Fusion Power Corporation's web site and view the YouTube video "StarPower for Tomorrow" !! This is real F
@ashman102 actually there are. Fusion research have more money to spend than the rest of the energy sources combined. But they not work with this type of fusion, it the giant donut that got everyone attention. Btw, great video!
Haha, you created plasma - only a small step away from a sustained fusion reactor. Well done! Who would have thought the solution to all of the world's energy problems would be found here on Youtube...
@danc222 Yeah, I hope you meant that in a ironic way.. cause these people havn't invented shit.. they merely replicated what scientists have been experimenting with in the last 5 years..
@fodete01 no i mean the isotope does not give off any radiation i.e. beta / alpha decay and it does not have a half life so i mean it is not radioactive
@jrbpyro101 i know how both work and i have my own fusor.... And when you said that's not what he ment..., well either way its not a nuclear process cuz D2 is a non nuclear isotope of hydrogen and the larger reactors such as the tokamak use D2 + tritium
@Xu53r1X He didnt say it was a nuclear reactor, he said nuclear fusion reactor. Nuclear reactors that use a fissile material are nuclear fission reactors which are completely different. They dont use tritium in nuclear fission reactors or fusion reactors for the most part. Some of the larger reactors use tritium I believe, but deuterium is usually the fuel. And finally deuterium is an isotope of hydrogen.
...and so, when the evil Spider Mastermind and the Cyberdemon send their minions of hell down to earth through the portals... we'll be ready with our PLASMA RIFLES! =3
I believe corresponding to a diameter of about 6 nucleons may not be stable enough because the four most tightly bounded nuclei are decreasing in order of the binding energy itself, ....that is to say 62Ni, 58Fe, 56Fe, and 60Ni.[4] require an adequate supply of deuterium-tritium fuel which the resulting energy barrier is limited to about 0.01 MeV.
Nuclear fusion is our definitive answer to climate change and the depleting resources of oil. Why the hell aren't research projects more heavily funded?
I invented a breakthrough energy source which violates the law of energy conservation. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena violating the law of energy conservation. I am looking for $6M for a prototype and patents.
Hello , it's sounds good that camera pics up only blue instead purple, only few Infra red are produced as heat : this is a good point § Just One intuition.- the "laser diode effect proves a polarised ligth. : Why don't you build a resonant cavity in order to tune, amplifies and eventually self sustain the process ? ;-P
@acapone84 Can you explain why it won't work? It's one thing to say something doesn't work, but if you don't explain _why_ it doesn't work, it just sounds like an arrogant dismissal.
@mike4ty4 Fusion does work and the physics is solid, but in the real world we haven't been able to get more energy out of a fusion reaction than we have put into it. IE you put 1000Watts into it to make it go and you only get 500Watts back out of it...
That's just a farnsworth fusor; the wire mesh sphere in the center is the negative terminal to attract the nucleons, the positive terminal is a concentric sphere of larger diameter. I independently came up with the design for one myself before I learned it had already been invented 40 years earlier. Put in 1 joule of electrical energy, get out 1.0001 joules of heat if you're lucky, and no heat engine is good enough to turn that into anywhere near the original 1 joule of useful energy. Try again.
I saw a similar thing on a forum but it was not producing energy, it was using energy to keep plasma hot.
Fusion reactor is a overunity reactor, if you spend 1 unit of energy to initialize the reaction, than the fusion reactor gives you much more than 2 unit.
@22rodneymullen22 No, something like 5000 C is enough. Lightning is plasma, so is the mercury in a fluo tube, so is neon or argon in the pizza man's sign, so is the plasma in a plasma TV.
as sad before it´s no problem to create your on plasma, just distinguish ionizing and non-onizing radiation, all you need for it is a strong magnetron, think about about it and create your own "star" xD
Atoms nucleus exploding all a time and radiate exploding energywaves. With this energywaves exploding atoms nucleus pushing themselsfs far a way same way what atoms nucleus exploding all a time.
This energywaves what exploding atoms nucleus radiate have a nature of exploding electrons and exploding particle.
Lets check out some my videos, like hello Brian Cocks and Stephen Hawking!
Don't confuse this blue glow with the Cherenkov radiation you see in a water-regulated fission reaction. This blue glow is almost entirely from hot plasma (not too different from a neon light), not the result of nuclear reactions.
Neon lights shine due to plasma discharge -- do you think beer signs rely on nuclear reactions?
Plasma is simply gas whose electrons are no longer bound to individual atoms. In a star, a nuclear fusion reaction heats the gas until it becomes a plasma. In a fusor, almost all of the energy heating the plasma is from the electricity being pumped through by the driving circuits. The temperature effects of the fusion are negligible.
The neutrons tell you there is a nuclear reaction. Not the glow.
Actually, if you hold a neutron counter up to this thing, you will get an increased neutron flux count. Thus, it is actually fusing isotopes of hydrogen. However the device is indeed an energy sink, not a source.
You think that deserves a Nobel Prize? Fusion reactors are so easy to make. I made one for only $80, although mine looks a lot crappier than that. Thousands of people have built these things, they are pretty easy to make. You can find directions online. Basically its just high voltages running through a wire grid in a vacuum. The electrons given off ionize what little gas is left and due to electromagnetism the the ions will all cluster in the center, if hydrogen is present you get fusion.
This is another one of those amazing demonstrations that proves that we as a species are capable of anything. Keep up the good work and I hope to see a Nobel Prize in the future for you.
Nobel Prizes are political stunts nowadays, not that this even qualifies for a hand clap... no disrespect but you can make this for like 60 bucks and a couple hours work
60$ might be enough to buy the plexiglass sheet....
But I agree with the Nobel prize comment.
This award used to mean something. Nowadays Nobel Peace Prizes are being handed out to war-mongering presidents, and lying politicians such as Barack Obama and Al Gore.
what happens is they have .5 of a gram of both tritium and deuterium together. Its compressed and heated to an extent that it ovecomes the coloumb barrier, releasing helium-4 and neutrons along with heat. The problem with the D/T fusion method is that over 80% of the energy potential is in the neutrons, which can't be used for energy production and can damage the reactor walls.
I thought the problem was that you can only get the fusion reaction at about 10 000 000 degrees, there for no metal can take. Which is the whole point of using a magnetic force to keep contained instead. But then it's the fact it takes to much fuel to get it that hot?
(I'm only 16, doing GCSE science, so correct me if I'm wrong lol)
Fusion is possible, It has been for a great while, the problem is that it is not as efficient as needed, you put in alot of fuel, and get all the energy in form of neutrons, wich are really hard to "harvest" and turn into other forms of energy, and the neutrons heat the metal to some extreme temperatures, wearing on the very expencive plating and parts..
Apparently nowadays most of the people in science societies don´t presume that the so called cold fusion could be possible. According to my theory it however is possible. As a matter of fact it is a relevant part of the
principles of the universe.
As I understand, observations of cold fusion can be observed in a certain substance, that has hydrogen atoms.
A sound (=a certain pressure wave) is conducted to that substance and according to my theory this sound cleans the
energywaves opening up at that that moment from two different hydrogen atomcores with the sound. After that these two cores of hydrogen atom don´t push themselves away from each other at the same relation as they expand.The other atoms around them continue to expand and push this way these two hydrogen atomcores close to each other with the energywaves that open up from themselves
This is the way that helium atom is born. At the same time it releases so called pure energy, which could maybe be used by a convenient technology.
It is possible, that the solid substance of the sufrace of earth has born like in cold fusion. Maybe the energybundles that came towards the globe and were energic enought caused that the liquid altered to a solid substance.
Maybe the globe once was a gasplanet and a gas altered to a liquid and a liquid to a solid substance.
If you are impressed with the Farnsworth fusor you should look up the Polywell reactor pioneered by the late great Robert Busard, its way better than the Farnsworth fusor and it has no physical internal grid so no grid losses. Hell, they've gotten closer to net power than any tokamak reactor ever made.
to be honest fusion is very easy if you have the right equipement ok here is the simple version get the fusion fuel, get the chamber, now make the eletric current at 25k negetive
and have it on the ground, pump in the fuel there you go
Um...I'm vaguely impressed, but to be honest I'm really not convinced. This is FUSION. 100 million degrees C, where did you get the energy from, which fusion reaction is it, deutrium-tritum or helium-3-helium-3, is the magnetic field supplied by those wires really sufficient to contain the plasma, fast moving neutrons, not safe. Basically, I need to see an explanation video before I accept you've managed it. The JET tokamak barely manages a few seconds...
The big tokamak reactors people think of when it comes to fusion operate by heating up a gas to great enough temperatures so that the average particle energy is greater than the coulombic repulsion forces between nuclei. They depend on magnetic confinement of the plasma.
This type of fusion is called Inertial Electrostatic Confinement. IEC uses two concentric grids, the samller central one is at high negative potential and accelerates the nuclei towards the center, the ions confine themselves.
Tokamak tech is a deadly born tech, since it suffers from severe COP problems. Take fusionable elements below Fe, ignite an el. plasma, perform a well timed magnetic hyperspace transfer cycle, where Coulomb barrier decreases with 1/n^2 (n=nth hyperspace). On return, the elements fuse and energy (el. COP>9) can be harvested. Black holes do it, suns do it, Sandia does it. Google for +Sandia +"Linear Transformer Driver". Since EHT is not an accepted theory, they don't talk about. They do it. ;-))
You didn't read my description of the video, obviously. I didn't say we achieved fusion, I said we created plasma, which leads up to fusion at a greater level of vacuum and power. A bottle of Deuterium is expensive and if you able to get your hands on a bottle, there are so many other safety concerns i.e. radiation, among others, that would take the price well out of the range of most COLLEGE students.
Atomic clock. Can be powered and energized by a solar clock but doesn't use sun light power, only uses laser light(Or also fiber optic laser light) which is absorbed in clock's solar panel cells or photo voltaic cells which absorb laser light and sends it to it's atomic clock.The reason to use this,not smart to have any electrical wires any were around atomic things,could cause radiation;Use safe laser light it can charge any device,even if under water it can charge from a distance of 10 meter.
Now, I wonder what gas they have inside there, and what evidence that fusion is occurring. I have read that Hirsch-Fransworth fusors (the device in the video) actually can and do produce fusion, but still not enough to balance out the energy put into them.
no shit not break even enrgy, no has done that yet, but ppl are trying, not these things though, tokamaks. This was invented in the 40s. If you think these havn't been tested by scientists to see if they work your dumb, they do work, but are useless. You do get minor sporatic fusion events in the plasma if its hot enough, you can detect the neutron emissions. Any anpdr-70 will show the neutron flux if it exists, even at less than 1cpm.
before i read the ino i thought you were claiming to have built a nuclear fusion reactor. i was getting ready to majorly criticise or congratulate lol. very well done. how was this plasma created by the way? ive seen plasma before but none this stable...
A campfire is a plasma too... but this is a long way from fusion!! Read up on the Farnsworth Fusor... this is the simplest fusion method I've seen... it uses an E field (as opposed to a B field, like in Tokamak) for confinement to fuse hydrogen into helium... BTW... have fun!! and don't blow up your neighborhood! ;^)
Fusion is safer, I'm sorry.
stevewetzel 4 months ago
You can gather energy from these reactors much like a fission reactor we use today. Instead of radioactive material you use plasma and fusion to boil water and spin a stream turbine to generate energy. Fission is safer with little radiation and little to no chance of catastophic meltdown, or any melt down for that matter.
stevewetzel 4 months ago
I am still not 100% clear on how we are going to gather energy from these reactions, any ideas, anyone, i want it to work, I just don't understand.
Rileyman2rr 4 months ago
Wow you can make a fusion reaction with a laser pen and some wire. Awesome.
blah979 4 months ago
While you are checking ... the place to look is Fusion Power Corporation's web site and view the YouTube video "StarPower for Tomorrow" !! This is real FUSION using Deuterium and Tritium. A solution to the energy problem that is real.
hhelsley 5 months ago
While you are checking ... the place to look is Fusion Power Corporation's web site and view the YouTube video "StarPower for Tomorrow" !! This is real F
hhelsley 5 months ago
It might have a blue glow, but Cherenkov radiation is nicer.
Freeflyer91 5 months ago
@Freeflyer91 First time I saw it in a cooling pond I was moved. Great colour.
dannyandrijanic 5 months ago
Our energy future is going to lie with Star Scientific's Muon Catalysed Fusion. Check out their you tube video " in the footsteps of fusion"
2110kop 6 months ago
i`m not familiar with the scientific term but i think thats what i ment, :D great job
darzuadrian 6 months ago
@ashman102 actually there are. Fusion research have more money to spend than the rest of the energy sources combined. But they not work with this type of fusion, it the giant donut that got everyone attention. Btw, great video!
thekingofancients 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is just a simple neon light, the reaction is unstable because you don't have enough if any mercury in the chamber
deadhead1688 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is just a simple neon light, the reaction is un stable because you don't have enough if any mercury in the chamber
deadhead1688 8 months ago
this is just a simple neon light, the reaction is un stable because you don't have enough if any mercury in the chamber
deadhead1688 8 months ago
Excellent demonstrations of a farnsworth fusor, well done!
wispa2 8 months ago
nice laser. u can clearly see the laserlight to the pointer
darzuadrian 8 months ago
@darzuadrian you mean the plasma tail? all fusors do this.
D34Df007 6 months ago
I fail to understand why anyone would dislike this.
rjpope42 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
vøll_geìl_gëbt_mäl_beï_gÒOglÉ:_geldeasy_eîN_vòll_krÃss
oftenloriendo2865654 9 months ago 10
@oftenloriendo2865654 GeH_sChê!SseN
xXhallschlagXx 8 months ago
this is the Hirsch Feinhold/Feynman (can't remember) reactor right? How many Volts are you running the inner grid at?
afroman1419 10 months ago
Scientists are scary! Just posted "The Boron Song" (aka "The Boron Rap") with lyrics. Have fun!!!
miyazaki999 10 months ago
Haha, you created plasma - only a small step away from a sustained fusion reactor. Well done! Who would have thought the solution to all of the world's energy problems would be found here on Youtube...
danc222 10 months ago
@danc222 Yeah, I hope you meant that in a ironic way.. cause these people havn't invented shit.. they merely replicated what scientists have been experimenting with in the last 5 years..
PtOs 8 months ago
oh if only we could find a sustainable method of producing fusion, all this crap about coal and petroleum would be a thing of the past. :\
de123man 10 months ago
would it cause a lethal does of radiation if the experiment failed?
newcomer9747 10 months ago
@newcomer9747 Not lasting radiation. There is only direct radiation, so no fallout.
N33DL3R 10 months ago
Dr. Octavius?
bodinian 10 months ago
power MOAR POWER!!!!
MrPenguinGod 10 months ago
how did you make your inner and outer grid, me and my friend want to make one and we need some help, thanks!!
aatmuri 11 months ago
too little catastrophic failure
zoebiflap 11 months ago
ooo Shiny...
That there is a pretty light!
komputeruser 11 months ago
dueterium IS NOT nuclear only tritium is
Xu53r1X 1 year ago
@Xu53r1X
u mean non-reactive with itself?
fodete01 1 year ago
@fodete01 no i mean the isotope does not give off any radiation i.e. beta / alpha decay and it does not have a half life so i mean it is not radioactive
Xu53r1X 1 year ago
@Xu53r1X one would say it is a stable isotope of hydrogen, whereas Tritium is an unstable isotope.
ConnorXV 11 months ago
@ConnorXV yes
Xu53r1X 11 months ago
so called cold fusion
molo265 1 year ago
where do you go to school? Mine has a similar senior design project going on
Sunburntpenguino 1 year ago
Enriched uranium must grow on trees where you live.
coolestdude80 1 year ago
@jrbpyro101 i know how both work and i have my own fusor.... And when you said that's not what he ment..., well either way its not a nuclear process cuz D2 is a non nuclear isotope of hydrogen and the larger reactors such as the tokamak use D2 + tritium
Xu53r1X 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what inner gas is in there?
OnnomonnomonnO 1 year ago
Comment removed
OnnomonnomonnO 1 year ago
@SorenaAurora It is not a nuclear reactor, you have no tritium just dueterium and D2 is not a nuclear isotope of hydrogen
Xu53r1X 1 year ago
@Xu53r1X He didnt say it was a nuclear reactor, he said nuclear fusion reactor. Nuclear reactors that use a fissile material are nuclear fission reactors which are completely different. They dont use tritium in nuclear fission reactors or fusion reactors for the most part. Some of the larger reactors use tritium I believe, but deuterium is usually the fuel. And finally deuterium is an isotope of hydrogen.
jrbpyro101 1 year ago
@Xu53r1X Its refered to as Heavy Hydrogen, Its called a Nuclear Fusion Reactor.
FogerRox 1 year ago
Danger, X-rays also!
ad2181 1 year ago
cuanta energia puede generar?
MaQuGo119 1 year ago
@MaQuGo119 en un segundo puede generar la misma cantidad de energia
que gasta la ciudad de chicago en 6 meses
robertoantoniohenriq 1 year ago
Comment removed
jeroengr0 1 year ago
life does fusion
JonThm 1 year ago
...and so, when the evil Spider Mastermind and the Cyberdemon send their minions of hell down to earth through the portals... we'll be ready with our PLASMA RIFLES! =3
TAz69x 1 year ago
Just out of curiosity, why is there a beam of plasma leaving the reactor through the bottom left corner?
Sorry if I sound dumb, but I am new to this kind of thing.
Nezzytheawesome 1 year ago
Whateva the other comments are!!! This is so exciting clip for me :)
halcyonylove 1 year ago
Does successful fusion release a significant amount of neutrons?
mobbindag 1 year ago
@mobbindag it depends on the type of fusible material used. For Deuterium- Deuterium reactions, you can expect one neutron per fusion event.
aradioactivedonut 1 year ago
and thus the sun Jeffery was born a star!
saftydance2 1 year ago
making baby stars
danialphaomega 1 year ago
Talk turbulent water, talk fusion!
JonThm 1 year ago
a very interesting.....
I believe corresponding to a diameter of about 6 nucleons may not be stable enough because the four most tightly bounded nuclei are decreasing in order of the binding energy itself, ....that is to say 62Ni, 58Fe, 56Fe, and 60Ni.[4] require an adequate supply of deuterium-tritium fuel which the resulting energy barrier is limited to about 0.01 MeV.
...nickel isotope is clearly the problem here.
lazernteebbee 1 year ago
Fusion from water!
JonThm 1 year ago
Iron man, here we come!
killingskaterboi 1 year ago
Nuclear fusion goes on in the air
JonThm 1 year ago
You just successfully built the reactor of Iron Man =D
Mastertim2006 1 year ago
Deep life is water powered
JonThm 1 year ago
Nuclear fusion is our definitive answer to climate change and the depleting resources of oil. Why the hell aren't research projects more heavily funded?
ashman102 1 year ago
I invented a breakthrough energy source which violates the law of energy conservation. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena violating the law of energy conservation. I am looking for $6M for a prototype and patents.
H. Tomasz Grzybowski
tel. +48-512-933-540
henrykay01 1 year ago
@henrykay01 how do we know u wont take our money and screw us over with somthing that will not work
gravedigr12 1 year ago
@gravedigr12 For $10 000 I can perform an experiment that will confirm my theory.
henrykay01 1 year ago
Hello , it's sounds good that camera pics up only blue instead purple, only few Infra red are produced as heat : this is a good point § Just One intuition.- the "laser diode effect proves a polarised ligth. : Why don't you build a resonant cavity in order to tune, amplifies and eventually self sustain the process ? ;-P
ElyanSun 1 year ago
hmmjemnd bei laune mit mia zu chaten oder am tele oder auch per cam ^^ bin gelangweilt
JudieKuzminskiu 1 year ago
assista videos proibidos no meu canal
Leandro20105 1 year ago
Blue Ray diode Fake !
ElyanSun 1 year ago
@ElyanSun You are not as clever as you think you are!
acapone84 1 year ago 6
@acapone84 Can you explain why it won't work? It's one thing to say something doesn't work, but if you don't explain _why_ it doesn't work, it just sounds like an arrogant dismissal.
mike4ty4 1 year ago
@mike4ty4 Fusion does work and the physics is solid, but in the real world we haven't been able to get more energy out of a fusion reaction than we have put into it. IE you put 1000Watts into it to make it go and you only get 500Watts back out of it...
thebestsumoeva 1 year ago
That's just a farnsworth fusor; the wire mesh sphere in the center is the negative terminal to attract the nucleons, the positive terminal is a concentric sphere of larger diameter. I independently came up with the design for one myself before I learned it had already been invented 40 years earlier. Put in 1 joule of electrical energy, get out 1.0001 joules of heat if you're lucky, and no heat engine is good enough to turn that into anywhere near the original 1 joule of useful energy. Try again.
medexamtoolsdotcom 1 year ago
If you can run it on a commercial basis you will be the richest person on earth...
2346 1 year ago
Nice!
I saw a similar thing on a forum but it was not producing energy, it was using energy to keep plasma hot.
Fusion reactor is a overunity reactor, if you spend 1 unit of energy to initialize the reaction, than the fusion reactor gives you much more than 2 unit.
I there's not overunity , it's not convenient.
viridisrock 1 year ago
Comment removed
AluminumStudios 1 year ago
just in case anyone's wondering.... no it doesn't have anything to do with your Plasma Television =/
pashaahsj 2 years ago
lol
camelsat1 1 year ago
u nvr knw man.. some pe
cya
pce out
pashaahsj 1 year ago
try beam a powerful laser beam at that thing
see if we get any reaction
or try to put a strong magnetic field around that the with some hydrogen gas around!
:D
torolof 2 years ago 2
what´s the EROEI for this?
pohjalo 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
thats a fake
DeKugelschieber 2 years ago
no it isn't.
npc223 2 years ago
you don't exist either, no point commenting :@
pashaahsj 2 years ago
A steam plasma does nuclear fusion: Using onyl a small v oltage to set it up.
JonThm 2 years ago
Plasma fusion 4 energy of the 21st century!!
HermyM2 2 years ago 35
how u do dat? what materials did u use
desamator10 2 years ago
if this were fusion would there be a huge explosion?
poopyinmymouth 2 years ago
maybe not HUGE explosion...but this is not fusion. just ionized air (plasma)
joh04667 2 years ago
now you idiot, only if the energy is released in a large amount in a small area at the same time
metroidprimefan4 2 years ago
almost, but not quite there :)
radumotisan 2 years ago
this is ion multipacting, not fusion
dachhh 2 years ago
It's a precursor. They don't have the time, money, energy, or equipment to go from plasma to fusion.
Kamakiriad66 2 years ago
not even nearly
plasma is as easy to do as shit, but fusion... (!!)
tho there is realy a -comparatively- easy way to get fusion, its used as a neutron source, but this reaction consumes much more energy as it produces
Assi2004 2 years ago
why does it have a "tail"?
heratioalundi 2 years ago
Cerenkov light
sypha0x 2 years ago
doesnt gas needed to be like 200 million degrees to create plasma?
22rodneymullen22 2 years ago
the electrostatic confinement compress che plasma until it reach the extreme pressure and themperature to start the D+D fustion reaction
Termi87ITA 2 years ago
100 million i think for actual fusion
Cla0016 2 years ago
No, I think this is a plasma of eletrons.
RafaelKmargo 2 years ago
@22rodneymullen22 No, something like 5000 C is enough. Lightning is plasma, so is the mercury in a fluo tube, so is neon or argon in the pizza man's sign, so is the plasma in a plasma TV.
vmelkon 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nice light bulb. The US leads in nuclear everything. China would be second, but that may change soon.
criticalzen 2 years ago
A steam plasma does molecular nuclear fusion: On Earth, today.
JonThm 2 years ago
as sad before it´s no problem to create your on plasma, just distinguish ionizing and non-onizing radiation, all you need for it is a strong magnetron, think about about it and create your own "star" xD
Schranz0rX 2 years ago
who is the leader today in the running for the controled nuclear fusion ?
ricardaomala2000 2 years ago
mmmmmmeeeeeeeee
Vylon1 2 years ago
Probably EFDA-JET.
HiAdrian 2 years ago
Europe
n3x4s6 2 years ago
watch the movie
watch?v=vDAZsPkTkMM&feature=related
n3x4s6 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
seems piontless and illegal
420chronmasta 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why? because
Atoms nucleus exploding all a time and radiate exploding energywaves. With this energywaves exploding atoms nucleus pushing themselsfs far a way same way what atoms nucleus exploding all a time.
This energywaves what exploding atoms nucleus radiate have a nature of exploding electrons and exploding particle.
Lets check out some my videos, like hello Brian Cocks and Stephen Hawking!
Etimespace 2 years ago
wow what is that
suleproductions 2 years ago
a fransworth fusor
solomonXR1 2 years ago
What can you tell us about the setup?
AdminOnDuty 2 years ago
Don't confuse this blue glow with the Cherenkov radiation you see in a water-regulated fission reaction. This blue glow is almost entirely from hot plasma (not too different from a neon light), not the result of nuclear reactions.
johnnymnemonic1 3 years ago 32
...what do you think a star is?...its plasma...all plasma...an ionized gas......and a star does fusion...fusion creates plasma
nice try...but it is an actual nuclear reaction
spike0804 2 years ago
Neon lights shine due to plasma discharge -- do you think beer signs rely on nuclear reactions?
Plasma is simply gas whose electrons are no longer bound to individual atoms. In a star, a nuclear fusion reaction heats the gas until it becomes a plasma. In a fusor, almost all of the energy heating the plasma is from the electricity being pumped through by the driving circuits. The temperature effects of the fusion are negligible.
The neutrons tell you there is a nuclear reaction. Not the glow.
johnnymnemonic1 2 years ago
and what exactly is a driving circuit...since when is their electricity doing at the point of fusion??
and you proved my point...nuclear fusion creates a plasma from the heat...
I don't know if you realized this...but when we create self-sustaining fusion....thats pretty much just a mini-star...so yes...there is plasma
No...neon lights don't rely on nuclear fusion....but plasma will always...ALWAYS...be caused by nuclear fusion
spike0804 2 years ago
plasma is just another state that matter can exist in
generally from coolest to hottest it goes:
solid>liquid>gas>plasma
Plasma is a convenient state of matter when trying to achieve fusion
LostMente 2 years ago
plasma is the ONLY state of matter when trying to achieve fusion
spike0804 2 years ago
how would you know? its foolish to say something is impossible. I doubt you understand the current accepted paradigm let alone emerging ones
LostMente 2 years ago
Look At Some ITER Videos
NickelodeonTM 3 years ago
Kool, good job. Thos thigns are complicated without experience. Yout title is misleading though.
usbiker133t 3 years ago
is this simular to a flame inside i glass inside a microwave? still creates plasma
JRC808 3 years ago
im 14 and im half way done with my iec
XXguitaraddictXX 3 years ago
Fusion? this is just a plasma, there cant be a fusion reaction going on..
rustygates 3 years ago
Actually, if you hold a neutron counter up to this thing, you will get an increased neutron flux count. Thus, it is actually fusing isotopes of hydrogen. However the device is indeed an energy sink, not a source.
Google "fusor" for details.
SandHill711 3 years ago
were do you get a neutron counter from? ANd how much do they cost?
Blondets1 2 years ago
Fusion reactor!?!? there is some contradiction!
riccardobevilacqua 3 years ago
Cerenkov light is so pretty.
BuchuBuchuMan 3 years ago 3
So then where is your Nobel prize?
WhrsTheMoneyLabowski 3 years ago
You think that deserves a Nobel Prize? Fusion reactors are so easy to make. I made one for only $80, although mine looks a lot crappier than that. Thousands of people have built these things, they are pretty easy to make. You can find directions online. Basically its just high voltages running through a wire grid in a vacuum. The electrons given off ionize what little gas is left and due to electromagnetism the the ions will all cluster in the center, if hydrogen is present you get fusion.
DarkStar1uav 3 years ago 6
If my mom knew about the things I build hehehe
Fullperson 3 years ago
@DarkStar1uav but honastly whats the point of spending 80 bucks to watch this thing glow seems pointless and useless
Paperst37 1 year ago
This is another one of those amazing demonstrations that proves that we as a species are capable of anything. Keep up the good work and I hope to see a Nobel Prize in the future for you.
quantummedicine 3 years ago
Nobel Prizes are political stunts nowadays, not that this even qualifies for a hand clap... no disrespect but you can make this for like 60 bucks and a couple hours work
trexilll 2 years ago
Then I'd like to see you do it and post a video, smartass. =D
talentedmagi 2 years ago
No shit why does everyone on youtube have to be an armchair quarterback.A couple hours work?Please....
NeilSpires 2 years ago
How do you know he already didn't?
Aohan815 1 year ago
60$ might be enough to buy the plexiglass sheet....
But I agree with the Nobel prize comment.
This award used to mean something. Nowadays Nobel Peace Prizes are being handed out to war-mongering presidents, and lying politicians such as Barack Obama and Al Gore.
Alfred Nobel is spinning in his grave.
L00NGB00W 1 year ago
Looks like a cathode ray tube demonstration without the cross...
reidalex 3 years ago
no cache :B
joaquincio 3 years ago
y kual es la gracia?
joaquincio 3 years ago
producir energia.
Helge129 3 years ago
what happens is they have .5 of a gram of both tritium and deuterium together. Its compressed and heated to an extent that it ovecomes the coloumb barrier, releasing helium-4 and neutrons along with heat. The problem with the D/T fusion method is that over 80% of the energy potential is in the neutrons, which can't be used for energy production and can damage the reactor walls.
bastardchild17 3 years ago 3
I thought the problem was that you can only get the fusion reaction at about 10 000 000 degrees, there for no metal can take. Which is the whole point of using a magnetic force to keep contained instead. But then it's the fact it takes to much fuel to get it that hot?
(I'm only 16, doing GCSE science, so correct me if I'm wrong lol)
Mallinson666 3 years ago 2
what is a fusion here?, much electricity in those wires can exiting electrons?. What results you get?
elreservista 3 years ago
Fusion is possible, It has been for a great while, the problem is that it is not as efficient as needed, you put in alot of fuel, and get all the energy in form of neutrons, wich are really hard to "harvest" and turn into other forms of energy, and the neutrons heat the metal to some extreme temperatures, wearing on the very expencive plating and parts..
lasserumpa 3 years ago
OLED's
GBS1043 3 years ago
do you magnetically charge the wires?
juavojuana 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Good. Now you see how cold fusion works
Bernoulli Effect - Science Theater 17
Those two cans get closer when air flows between them simulates how two protons are joined together. So then we have a helium-atom with cold fusion.
Etimespace 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Cold fusion
Apparently nowadays most of the people in science societies don´t presume that the so called cold fusion could be possible. According to my theory it however is possible. As a matter of fact it is a relevant part of the
principles of the universe.
As I understand, observations of cold fusion can be observed in a certain substance, that has hydrogen atoms.
Etimespace 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A sound (=a certain pressure wave) is conducted to that substance and according to my theory this sound cleans the
energywaves opening up at that that moment from two different hydrogen atomcores with the sound. After that these two cores of hydrogen atom don´t push themselves away from each other at the same relation as they expand.The other atoms around them continue to expand and push this way these two hydrogen atomcores close to each other with the energywaves that open up from themselves
Etimespace 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is the way that helium atom is born. At the same time it releases so called pure energy, which could maybe be used by a convenient technology.
It is possible, that the solid substance of the sufrace of earth has born like in cold fusion. Maybe the energybundles that came towards the globe and were energic enought caused that the liquid altered to a solid substance.
Maybe the globe once was a gasplanet and a gas altered to a liquid and a liquid to a solid substance.
Etimespace 3 years ago
If you are impressed with the Farnsworth fusor you should look up the Polywell reactor pioneered by the late great Robert Busard, its way better than the Farnsworth fusor and it has no physical internal grid so no grid losses. Hell, they've gotten closer to net power than any tokamak reactor ever made.
madzyzome 3 years ago 3
the descriptions said they didnt achieve fusion
Aspartame69 3 years ago
to be honest fusion is very easy if you have the right equipement ok here is the simple version get the fusion fuel, get the chamber, now make the eletric current at 25k negetive
and have it on the ground, pump in the fuel there you go
dirtybird2212 3 years ago
Um...I'm vaguely impressed, but to be honest I'm really not convinced. This is FUSION. 100 million degrees C, where did you get the energy from, which fusion reaction is it, deutrium-tritum or helium-3-helium-3, is the magnetic field supplied by those wires really sufficient to contain the plasma, fast moving neutrons, not safe. Basically, I need to see an explanation video before I accept you've managed it. The JET tokamak barely manages a few seconds...
Vorkagen 3 years ago
The big tokamak reactors people think of when it comes to fusion operate by heating up a gas to great enough temperatures so that the average particle energy is greater than the coulombic repulsion forces between nuclei. They depend on magnetic confinement of the plasma.
This type of fusion is called Inertial Electrostatic Confinement. IEC uses two concentric grids, the samller central one is at high negative potential and accelerates the nuclei towards the center, the ions confine themselves.
userjjb 3 years ago 2
Tokamak tech is a deadly born tech, since it suffers from severe COP problems. Take fusionable elements below Fe, ignite an el. plasma, perform a well timed magnetic hyperspace transfer cycle, where Coulomb barrier decreases with 1/n^2 (n=nth hyperspace). On return, the elements fuse and energy (el. COP>9) can be harvested. Black holes do it, suns do it, Sandia does it. Google for +Sandia +"Linear Transformer Driver". Since EHT is not an accepted theory, they don't talk about. They do it. ;-))
sacha4you 3 years ago
You didn't read my description of the video, obviously. I didn't say we achieved fusion, I said we created plasma, which leads up to fusion at a greater level of vacuum and power. A bottle of Deuterium is expensive and if you able to get your hands on a bottle, there are so many other safety concerns i.e. radiation, among others, that would take the price well out of the range of most COLLEGE students.
SorenaAurora 3 years ago
Atomic clock. Can be powered and energized by a solar clock but doesn't use sun light power, only uses laser light(Or also fiber optic laser light) which is absorbed in clock's solar panel cells or photo voltaic cells which absorb laser light and sends it to it's atomic clock.The reason to use this,not smart to have any electrical wires any were around atomic things,could cause radiation;Use safe laser light it can charge any device,even if under water it can charge from a distance of 10 meter.
humexavier 3 years ago
Are you sure that was 100,000,000 C?
D2T8L 3 years ago
Now, I wonder what gas they have inside there, and what evidence that fusion is occurring. I have read that Hirsch-Fransworth fusors (the device in the video) actually can and do produce fusion, but still not enough to balance out the energy put into them.
indigofuzzy 3 years ago
no shit not break even enrgy, no has done that yet, but ppl are trying, not these things though, tokamaks. This was invented in the 40s. If you think these havn't been tested by scientists to see if they work your dumb, they do work, but are useless. You do get minor sporatic fusion events in the plasma if its hot enough, you can detect the neutron emissions. Any anpdr-70 will show the neutron flux if it exists, even at less than 1cpm.
usbiker133t 3 years ago
tis helium 3
paindeer 3 years ago
E.T had a red one in his chest. haha i'm so not funny.
MysteriousDrJ 4 years ago
HAHAHAHA shit that was funny
shawnboy1111 3 years ago
Aliens like to hide near the reactor cause its nice and warm
SegaJackNLS 4 years ago
before i read the ino i thought you were claiming to have built a nuclear fusion reactor. i was getting ready to majorly criticise or congratulate lol. very well done. how was this plasma created by the way? ive seen plasma before but none this stable...
jackdench101 4 years ago
for real, this is really nice, howd u pull it off?
Clam91 4 years ago
Beautiful Artificial Star =)
kardrak 4 years ago
so how powerfull did that one get?
noshatch19 4 years ago
A campfire is a plasma too... but this is a long way from fusion!! Read up on the Farnsworth Fusor... this is the simplest fusion method I've seen... it uses an E field (as opposed to a B field, like in Tokamak) for confinement to fuse hydrogen into helium... BTW... have fun!! and don't blow up your neighborhood! ;^)
KarlaHomolka1 4 years ago 2
How can you confine with E field?
T0B0KKE 4 years ago
I would say inside a hollow uniformly charged torus but that would be wrong, so Ill go for the not so practical around a uniformly charged sun.
dibbuck 4 years ago