i like how he sung it it was nice but i thought it was a bit on the fast side i like it better when its sung slower. it feels more like the man is thinking and reflecting rather then just, for lack of a better word, spurting out the words. but i still think its lovely he really was a great singer
@KaleidoscopeAct Yes, it was speeded up somewhat, I think. But then again we have only poor recordings - in various qualities - to judge by. How did he really sound like live?
The majority of the opera public at the time (MET and abroad) didn't buy tickets for a specific opera, but for a performance where Caruso was the tenor.
One hundred years after its recording, I found the Caruso rendition valuable. Besides its exellence, I was impressed with the way he was able to allow his voice to break, twice, near the end, with emotion, and still return to the true line of the music.
Also, your translation from Italian to English seems better, to me, than the libretto I have.
U Know one thing that funny about Caruso...If he were alive in my life time he would make me a pauper because I would spend all my money just to hear this guy sing! His voice is definitely unfathomable simply unbelieve! WOW!!!!!!
Mr. Caruso's "big notes" are so strong, and, you can hear, at the end of each, that he had plenty of air left! His tone and vibrato on EVERY note....what a pure pleasure! Thank you!
This is from the 1908-1909 recordings that seem to be rather complicated by his vocal and personal problems of that brief period. The 1910 recordings, on the other hand, show a somewhat new Caruso with extraordinary new vocal and interpretive powers. His voice was much darker, again, in 1910, than was the case in some of these 1908-1909 pieces, in my opinion. But thanks for posting this beautiful remastering.
Yes, vurria123, there were several personal problems at the time (Giachetti) and, I believe, the first operation on his vocal chords - his voice was definately darker after that.
I received this remastering from (YouTube username) Pawelp, so I cannot really take credit for it :-)
Better than the one I'm used to (Naxos). But the Manon Lescaut one that was posted a while ago was even better. What I like about these recordings is that they show the intensity and focus of the voice. Listen to the last A he sings, it's an intense beam of energy. Gives me goosebumps.
Bajo la brillante luz de las estrellas tus pieceitos descalzos apenas rosaban la arena , ay Dios mío y Yo sentía muchas ganas de darles un beso.
Patronistaindustrial 4 weeks ago
Imagine what this would sound like with modern sound systems. No harm in dreaming.
TheJrollino 1 month ago
Caruso records often run around 75 or lower, but Idk what this one needs. It's a bit too fast I think.
Kadda1234 2 months ago
@Kadda1234 Yes, it is too fast.
tomfroekjaer 2 months ago
Wonderful. It gave me goose bumps.
slamtodeath 2 months ago
i like how he sung it it was nice but i thought it was a bit on the fast side i like it better when its sung slower. it feels more like the man is thinking and reflecting rather then just, for lack of a better word, spurting out the words. but i still think its lovely he really was a great singer
canelongno1 4 months ago
Is this the right speed?
KaleidoscopeAct 7 months ago
@KaleidoscopeAct Nope - I'm sure it isn't. But it sounds great ....
tomfroekjaer 7 months ago
@KaleidoscopeAct Yes, it was speeded up somewhat, I think. But then again we have only poor recordings - in various qualities - to judge by. How did he really sound like live?
The majority of the opera public at the time (MET and abroad) didn't buy tickets for a specific opera, but for a performance where Caruso was the tenor.
tomfroekjaer 7 months ago
Esta medio ton arriba, que bueno!!
Recomiendo pavarotti y tito schifa pero, logico, nadie como él
edulusos 7 months ago
Caruso is forever and ever the best!
R.
rosaponselleart 9 months ago 3
@rosaponselleart Thanks R. - or M. :-)
... Beautiful soul and voice.
tomfroekjaer 9 months ago
me gusta
sybillacdca 1 year ago
The only one who could beat pavarotti.... No one above him!!!
mauriciomille 1 year ago
@mauriciomille Fritz Wunderlich, better.
AdriaFloriDeSoc 5 months ago
OH THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU!!
This is incredible!
cenodus 1 year ago
really the best restoration. thanks.
M.
maldoror26 1 year ago
Thank you for posting this. I still love the recording myself!
Pawelp 2 years ago
Thank you so much for posting!
One hundred years after its recording, I found the Caruso rendition valuable. Besides its exellence, I was impressed with the way he was able to allow his voice to break, twice, near the end, with emotion, and still return to the true line of the music.
Also, your translation from Italian to English seems better, to me, than the libretto I have.
Many many thanks!
Dionaysia 2 years ago 5
You are most welcome, Dionaysia !
tomfroekjaer 2 years ago
Thank you, Tom. Caruso is such a find for me.
NaiveVoice 2 years ago 2
Glad to share it and Caruso with you, NaiveVoice!
Come to think of it, didn't Caruso have "Naive" Voice?
tomfroekjaer 2 years ago
Such a wonderful voice. It brings me to tears.
Aliselia1 2 years ago
the italian opera is the best, i ahte french, the italian has that emotive feeling in the way of talking, spanish is great too, i love them both
Mattnek 2 years ago
Best Version of E Lucevan Le Stelle! Thank You for posting this!
tenorenchanted 2 years ago 8
U Know one thing that funny about Caruso...If he were alive in my life time he would make me a pauper because I would spend all my money just to hear this guy sing! His voice is definitely unfathomable simply unbelieve! WOW!!!!!!
tenorenchanted 2 years ago
Mr. Caruso's "big notes" are so strong, and, you can hear, at the end of each, that he had plenty of air left! His tone and vibrato on EVERY note....what a pure pleasure! Thank you!
tomkellycartoons 2 years ago
This is from the 1908-1909 recordings that seem to be rather complicated by his vocal and personal problems of that brief period. The 1910 recordings, on the other hand, show a somewhat new Caruso with extraordinary new vocal and interpretive powers. His voice was much darker, again, in 1910, than was the case in some of these 1908-1909 pieces, in my opinion. But thanks for posting this beautiful remastering.
vurria123 2 years ago
Yes, vurria123, there were several personal problems at the time (Giachetti) and, I believe, the first operation on his vocal chords - his voice was definately darker after that.
I received this remastering from (YouTube username) Pawelp, so I cannot really take credit for it :-)
tomfroekjaer 2 years ago
very good enhancement. who did it, you?
maldoror26 2 years ago
Yes, I think it's good too. Pawelp sent it to me for upload.
tomfroekjaer 2 years ago
they show the intensity and focus of the voice
agreed, very good
ShawDAMAN 2 years ago
Better than the one I'm used to (Naxos). But the Manon Lescaut one that was posted a while ago was even better. What I like about these recordings is that they show the intensity and focus of the voice. Listen to the last A he sings, it's an intense beam of energy. Gives me goosebumps.
GermanOperaSinger 2 years ago
Yes, as you say, the previous Monon Lexcaut is better and this is better than the Marston where much of the power of his voice is missing.
When are they going to invent that time machine... :-)
tomfroekjaer 2 years ago
Maravillosa interpretación como siempre.
migocefire 2 years ago