Its too bad that as people are waking up the media is shutting people down... every time I see the Republican Candidates they always show only Romney, santorum, and gingrich. THEY DON'T EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE HIS EXISTENCE!
Ron Paul knows what ills this country, and it's a cancer in washington and it's roots go deep through news media , FED and the military industrial complex
If you were to put Ron Paul next to Obama America would realize Obama doesn't really say anything of substance. Dr. Paul would look way more intelligent and he would actually get fair time to answer questions haha in reality if republicans want to win put RP on the ticket. Who knows maybe all these corrupt assholes would realize if they can make more in a free market system than just extorting the world like leeches.
You have the strength you do because you did not waste money trying to take over the world. Instead by promoting peace, you give a good example and prosper with a true economy. If a prosperous country falters, it will be because it does not follow the principles and path that lead it to that point. The roman, the soviets, The Turkish, The Egyptians, the English empires all fell because they spread themselves to thin and forgot how they became wealthy and prosperous. Bring sanity back to USA!
PPL HOPING AND PRAYING THAT HE WILL WIN WONT GET THINGS DONE. Lets take Action protests outside of bilderburg meetings letting know that dont mess with ron paul if he dies we will know what happen and we should intimidate them and call their names out one by one . Lets take action so he wont end up like jfk and rfk. Add me on facebook type jbauer364@gmail.com
so we can do this besides many other things I have around 300 ppl. If u r
ashamed being in a movement just make a new facebook accou
ALL PEOPLE WHO SUPPORT FREEDOM FROM BULLSHIT VOTE FOR RON PAUL IN THE REPUBLICAN PRIMARY 2012!!!!! FREEDOM!! IF YOU DONT VOTE AGAINST THEM THEN YOU SUPPORT THE ONES WHO ENSLAVE YOU!!!! FREE YOURSELF AND YOUR BROTHER, CHECK OUT RON PAUL!!!!
I worked in the food industry for years starting in 1968. I can tell you straight the quality of food and what does into the can is a joke today . in 1969 quality control was 10x better than it was in 2003. FACT. People should do a google search on new laws that now allow poisons in the food along with groth hormones.. My famlies fav . Veg. was corn Now none of us can it that crap in a can. Birdseye coolwhip that used to be thrown out if open when going threw freezing process is now ok
My question to Ron Paul would be: Why do our politicians and elected officials, including yourself, always refer to our system of government as a "democracy" when the founding fathers clearly taught us that we are a "free republic"? In the pledge of allegiance it says, "And to the REPUBLIC for which it stands" not, and to the "democracy" for which it stands. And BTW...I am a Ron Paul supporter all the way...except for the democracy thing...LOL
I agree somewhat with Paul on the foreign policy stuff, but Schaeffer had a point. The audience shouldn't have just booed him. Personally, I believe there should be a minimum amount of international responsibility to stop it if some dictator wants to kill 1 million of his own people, and we'd need some bases worldwide for that. Someone would have to stop that guy. Too much of Paul's foreign policy and if another Hitler shows up, we wont do anything about it.
@iluvatar003 Yeah that policy hsa been sooooooo succesful. Vietnam, Korea, Panama, Iraq, etc. Name one time such a policy was a success. Let's get over the pretty sounding theories and go by what actually works. Defense of National borders and our constitution.
@firestrings272 WWII it worked. I know most those policies have been unsuccessful and WWII had mixed success. That isn't my point. The point is I don't think it is right for all the nations of the world to watch people die when a dictator shows up. The world is much more intergrated now than it was in 1776. Some things about the constitution might have to be amended.
@iluvatar003 The only reason we entered WW2 was because we were attacked at Pearl Harbor by the Japanese who was part of the Axis powers you idiot. Being attacked and pre-emptively attacking are two totally different things and it's no secret that all the countries the US has intervened in has been at the interest of major corporations, oil and opium. Why didn't the US act during the Rwanda massacre3?Why hasn't Cuba been invaded?Why hasn't North Korea? Get over your moral idealism,it's bullshit.
@firestrings272 You are not telling me anything I don't know. And regardless of why we got into WWII (we were helping Britain before we got in it), it doesnt change the fact that it did work. I think we should have done something about Rwanda. Cuba has been invaded, stupid, remember the Bay of Pigs? (which didn't work) . NK hasn't been invaded because of political reasons. So what? Moral idealism is not bullshit. And I think we have a responsibility to do something if genocides start.
@iluvatar003 Then why didn't the US step in to help Rwanda?Go back to high school and take a history lesson, dumbass, the US was not engaged in war until Pearl Harbor.Cuba was not invaded you stupid piece of shit, the Bay of Pigs was an operation led by CIA assets not by the US military you dumbass, get your facts straight.You think you have a right to tell other countries what to do and how to live?Thast policy has brought deaths and US-friendly dictatorships.Pinochet,the Shah,etc.
@firestrings272 You never heard of Lend-Lease or the end of the Neutrality Acts or when the US and UK jointly occupied Iceland and Greenland in 1940-41. Don't argue with me about history, and don't insult me. The Bay of Pigs was a US-CIA operation; I don't see how that doesn't count as an invasion. We supported the Shah and Pinochet for bad reasons yes (for Cold War reasons). WE DON'T HAVE TO KEEP DOING THAT.... THINGS CAN CHANGE.
@firestrings272 cont. Like I said, I think we should have went into Rwanda. And yes, If a dictator wants to kill 1 million of his own people, then yes we should tell them how to live.
@iluvatar003 cont2 But then we should leave very quickly. It's turns out bad when the US occupies. We did it as best as it probably could have been done when we left W. Germany, but the Cold War prevented us from removing our bases. We aren't really in that situation anymore, so our policy can be revised. Too many people see those other occupations as either just good or bad, & dont look for the nuances, finding out exactly where they went wrong or what can be fixed 4 later..
@iluvatar003 Notice how everything you said has been a big"if" or a "should have" you have said nothing factual or empirical to justify your ridiculous ideology except the notion of "I think it's the right thing to do". When you grow up and learn that life and especially politics is about an interest, you'll understand why the War in Iraq happened. Why the country of Panama was devastated with so much death and why afghanistan has been so important to the world powers.
@firestrings272 When I grow up? I know why that stuff happened. I also know there have been cases when occupation works, i.e. S. Korea, Japan, W Germany & Austria. I disagreed w/the War in Iraq. I said there should be intl responsiblity if genocides start... then you started talking about Panama, Chile, Vietnam, Afghanistan and NK when there weren't genocides there. You missed my point entirely, then called me my beliefs were ridiculous. It can be done right, and I think we should start.
@iluvatar003 Oh I see, so you're saying only if genocide is occuring? Again.....what was that little event that happened in Rwanda? Or how about the genocide in Tibet? Or how about the massacre in Darfur? Where was the moral police? Grow up, no counry is going to use it's forces unless there is an economic interest involved.
@firestrings272 The UN at least tried to do something in Rwanda but they had too few troops. Clinton and Albright had their thumps up their ass the whole time. Economic interests and fears of WWIII prevented anything in Tibet. And Darfur was a waste, no one really cared. You might be right in that a country wont do anything unless economic interest is involved (which is a overly cynical view as it is not always true). But a country policy can be revised, which is all I want.
@iluvatar003 It's not cynicism, it's reality. And who are you to determine the destiny of a sovereign nation? Before you go trying to save the world I suggest you look at what has happened to the Alaskan eskimos over the years, the GA School of the Americas training program for latin american soldiers, the environmental destruction of Ecuadorian land by Texaco, the toxic waste by Ford that has killed thousands of US citizens. Where's your morality regarding that?
@firestrings272 Your plan of just leaving these nations so that corporations can run willy-nilly over them doesn't seem much better to me. The destiny of a sovereign nation is up to them, unless the leader wants to kill half of it off. There have to be some limits to a policy. I thought genocide was an agreeable limit. I guess not. I guess it's too conceited of me to expect that a nation not kill its own people. Apparently genocide is a mandatory part of a nation's destiny.
@iluvatar003 What the fuck do you think the American Civil war was? That was genocide but it had to happen. Neither you or anybody can decide what a sovereign nation can or cannot do. So what about all the domestic problems you conveniently ignore?Problems that affect all of us and are just as bad. Take care of your own house before you start worrying about your neighbor's.
@firestrings272 The Civil War was a genocide? Now who needs a history class.... Not every war is a genocide. And domestic problems? The issue was foreign policy, not domestic issues. I don't want the US intervening in other nation's domestic stuff except if they cause genocide. That way it can at least be a better force of benevolence and non-interference worldwide. Paul's solution for social problems is to keep govt out of it, which I assume u agree with. I'm not gonna argue w/u on that.
@iluvatar003 "it's too conceited of me to expect that a nation not kill its own people" Was that not your definition of Genocide? Thats what happens in ALL Civil Wars.Why did NATO attack Lybia? There was no genocide there just a civil war. So according to you foreign problems are more important than the domestic problems of a nation?You don't care about America? I find it very sad when a person feels some sort of moral obligation to protect the world while seeing their own country going to shit.
@firestrings272 Look up the word "Genocide" in Websters if you don't understand it. The Civil War was not a genocide, nor was it my definition of one. Civil wars/state execution arent genocide, don't act like I said it was. No, I didnt say foreign problems were more important than domestic. I said we weren't discussing domestic problems, and I wanted you to stop changing the subject. Why are you asking me about Libya? I said what I think US policy should be, and you're bringing up NATO.
And that's it, right? No calls for Congress to take my hard-earned cash and use it to bomb brown people, do we agree? Iluvatar003, the problem with trying to save everybody is that you're bound to end up on the wrong side. You may want to stop a "genocide," but you risk committing a different genocide to achieve this, as you are bound invevitably to choose sides. Who is to say which side is the most righteous? You? Me? Your cat? Think about it.
@ftorresgamez We agree on no bombing brown people. We are also probably going to be on the wrong side if we support puppet dictators. But I think the righteous side is more likely the side being slaughtered. Not everyone is righteous and mistakes can be made, but there is no situation I can conceive where it would be better off to just let a genocide happen just because it will cost some money to stop it.
"But I think the righteous side is more likely the side being slaughtered. "
Maybe. However, there's always the likeliness of error in judgment when choosing sides. Imagine I see you fightng another fellow and I intervene to help the person who is clearly, to me, on the losing side, and I shoot YOU. While you are laying there, dying, would you still think my judgment was just as sound as yours? I would bet you would not, except your and mine were not different at all.
@ftorresgamez Hypothetical situations are hard to debate. In a war, there's gonna be collateral damage. If I got shot but the genocide ended, I guess I'd feel better... but I'd be dead...
Poor Tony Shaeffer - he keeps saying "for better or for worse" - isn't it obvious he doesn't base his ideas on what's best, but rather on how he was brought up?
wow.. i never thought about it. why should future generations go to war because of some deal some old doods 80 years ago made with another country? this man never ceases to englighten me.
Even if Ron Paul didn't win and Obama did, I would give "almost anything" to see Ron Paul win the Republican nomination just to see him debate Obama Face-to-Face.
CONSTITUTION DAY MONEYBOMB ON SATURDAY, SEPT 17, 2011. Please consider donating and help Dr. Paul's message get across to the American people without mainstream media distortion. America needs Ron Paul - we can all help! Ron Paul 2012!
In order for Dr.Paul to win, HE NEEDS THE PRIMARY. That's the toughest part.
IF YOU WANT TO VOTE IN PRIMARY YOU HAVE TO BE REGISTERED REPUBLICAN! If you don't switch parties in time, (3 months ahead in some states) YOU WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO VOTE!!
Switch in time democrats and indepedents! Republicans:GET TO THE PRIMARIES!! ALL OF YOU!!! YOU KNOW WHAT TO DO NOW DO IT!!
Please help spread this message, and also thumb it up when U C these.
Yes shut down everything!! Fire the military !!! No more police"!! No more imcome tax return!! Shut everything make your own food your own computers ah dont forget memorize the constitution ha ha
I know this old man wants to go back to the gold standard but can someone explain to me how we are going to find enough gold to support a 17 TRILLION DOLLAR GLOBAL ECONOMY. How I ask you people......HOW??? There's a reason why we have fiat money but unfortunately that's been abused by the worst generation of all time: Baby Boomers
Dear Marakulous43 if you have the respect of your friends and neighbour, when you are in trouble i'm very sure everyone will love to help.People will be lend you a hand and pick you up where you have fall.
@Marakulous43 I think you are misunderstanding a gold standard. There is always enough money no matter how big the economy is if the money is divisible. A fixed quantity of money will just appreciate as the economy grows. So if you have one hundred dollars backed by a gold standard that buys a textbook, over time you will only need 95 for a textbook. You wouldn't be physically carrying around any gold. It would be in a bank and you would just have a note that represents a tangible asset
@mjbarrowful Ancient societies have trillions if not 1 quadrillion in gold. If we go to a gold standard you will be in their power. Wake up. You do NOT need gold. You need scarcity. England did not have gold...used wood...tally system and had NO inflation for 800 years.
The problem is Gold costs 600/oz to produce. In a fractional reserve system, that oz is worth 6000-9000 if you have a banking cartel right. Again...gold will NOT work.
@mjbarrowful Gold can be manipulated. The market can be cornered easily. All we need is US issued notes, except the amount must be kept in proportion to the amount of trade needed to facilitate.
@ORACLE063 Save it! You WRong Paul supporters always want to talk about this Media Industrial Complex and other nonsense. You WRong Paul supporters always mention "Zionists" (which is a code name for Jews) trying to take over the world. You people are simply out of touch with reality.
@Marakulous43 You do know there are Christian Zionists dont you ???? so how is it a code name for Jews ??? Zionism is a political ideology ,and has no part of religious readings or followings
PEOPLE NEED TO SWITCH PARTIES 12 WEEKS IN ADVANCE OF THE PRIMARIES IN MOST STATES.
IF YOU DO NOT SWITCH IN TIME YOU CANNOT VOTE IN PRIMARY.
IF YOU ARE NOT REGISTERED REPUBLICAN YOU CANNOT VOTE IN PRIMARY.
IF RON PAUL DOES NOT WIN PRIMARY, NO GENERAL ELECTION ! REGISTER AS A REPUBLICAN. FIND OUT WHEN YOUR STATE HAS PRIMARIES. FIND OUT WHERE AND VOTE VOTE VOTE ! PLEASE !
WE NEED EVERY LAST VOTE ! Copy and paste this everywhere.
Colonel Schaffer is completely controlled by the collectivists....the free market finds an alternative with $10/gallon GAS not Oil....$10/bbl oil would mean about $.50/gallon gas, what a rube.
We have TONS of natural resources in the states and in countries we trade with...we don't need to go to war for cheaper prices, we need to innovate an discover to bring down prices.
Please support Ron Paul..spread the word to friends and family.. the media will try to ignore him...but we the people are Ron's last chance to get the election. HE WILL PUT AN END TO SPENDING TRILLIONS ON WARS and that will be more good news for Americans..more money to create jobs
What we need to do is make it so that government social programs actually function properly and work for the people, not eliminate them all together. Again, this whole idea that government should have no role in peoples lives, goes against the very idea of government. And Ron Paul actually believes he can eliminate the FAA, the Department of Education, of Energy, of Housing and Urban Development; he can just eliminate everything basically! He must have his head in the clouds, itll never happen!
Ron Paul is too much of an idealist, how does he honestly expect to just eliminate every government program? There is no way he will get congressional support for that. And many government programs are good programs. He just has this idea "get the government out of peoples lives, don't rely on them for anything" and it is all sounds nice, sure, but it just isn't realistic. Neither is not sending troops to back up a country you have a treaty with. If by miracle he wins, he won't change anything.
@JohnJancar what a awesome defeatist view point, give up without trying. We can get these programs out just as they got them in what can be put in place can also be removed. Nothing is set in stone.
@Hotwolf327 But that isn't the answer, the answer is making these programs function properly. I think the Federal government should play a role in peoples lives, a role of service and oversight. We can't just get rid of government, it would never work, human beings are not mature enough to not have an overseer. We need to root out corruption in government, that is the problem, the corruption, not government itself.
@JohnJancar The point of this nation is the individuality of the states to function on their own while united under the same ideals and law, the constitution, the government isn't suppose to play such a huge role, that has never been the reason for it. It's up to the state and courts and the people to decide.
@Hotwolf327 Well every state does function on their own, and each state government has laws and rules that are independent of other states. What the federal government does is provide oversight to state governments. And yes corruption is a huge problem in all levels of government, but the answer is to get rid of the corruption, not get rid of government itself. I honestly don't think the masses are smart enough, or mature enough, to govern themselves, people need "leaders" to lead them.
@JohnJancar It would be GRADUAL. It can be realistic if people change, which will take generations but either you start somewhere or keep doing like we're doing and all end up screwed. What would you prefer?
@iEatBoneDust Well what about Obama, everyone is complaining that he hasn't changed everything, you said it yourself, change is gradual. And I don't think it's realistic, or sensible, to just eliminate the Federal government. You eliminate some programs, yes. But the Department of Education, of Energy, of Health and Human services, of Commerce, he even wants to eliminate the federal postal service! He wants to eliminate everything basically, there is no way congress would vote for that.
@JohnJancar the Department of Education we now know is a sham created by unions to help elect Charter into office. We are behind in education because of the department. Most of these serves hinder us then help. The ED is viewed by many as unconstitutional and Ron Paul isn't the first to want it gone.
@Hotwolf327 Well I don't think the DoE is responsible for America's poor level of academics. I blame this cultural attitude here, that school sucks, and learning is boring. I blame the media and entertainment for promoting this culture of ignorance and leisure, instead of hard work and knowledge. I blame parents for not instilling a thirst for knowledge and excellence in their kids. I finally blame kids themselves for not being smart or mature enough to take their schooling more seriously.
@JohnJancar This isn't my quote but sums up our Government nicely "The federal government was merely comprised for really limited reasons - common defense and security, standardization of currency and interstate commerce regulation. That really is it. There is no "general welfare" provision, and there are many quotes on that by the founders, because that would make the Constitution open ended, and that is definitely not what the founder's had in mind in order to secure liberty and freedom."
@Hotwolf327 Well I firmly believe that any system of government, whether it is communism, dictatorship, or democracy, in any form, can work, if...if the people in power actually care about their people and seek to serve them. And also, I believe any system of government, in any form, will always become corrupted if the leaders become corrupted, and seek to service themselves instead of the people. So I think if we really want to change things, the only way to do it is root out corrupt people.
Yessir boyo lets go out to them there polls an vote for thats Bachmenn fella, shell fix alls of ares problems an get us back in lin don here in kentucky, ifs yous don vot bachmenn then you a faggot, cuz you don like em women
Or you could be rational and vote in a consistent conservative like Ron Paul, either way its your choice.
Already registered just in case, and who knows, the primary might have changed since four years ago. I had to register as a republican so I could vote for Dr. Paul in 2008, and if Ron Paul doesn't win the primary, I'm moving to... well, haven't thought about it yet, but I will lose the little bit of faith left that I have for this country.
I am a true aethist but I support Ron Paul principles. By changing people's principles, it will in turn change their behavior and hopefull change their attitude and policies in government. Self reliance is something we teach our kids like how to drive, how to cook, how to read a map, how to manage our own finances.. So self reliance is not an old idea. It has been around for a long long time and we already practice it at home with our kids. Ron is advocate we should challenge the status quo.
I think it's hilarious. Everyone likes to protest the wars because it's the new, hip thing to do, but the second gas prices spike everyone is moaning and groaning that prices are too high. You can't have everything people. Either we go to war, or we pay out the ass. Our "civilized" society just hates to face the fact that people must die for us to continue living the way we do, at least for the time being. They hate even more admitting that they would rather be at war, than paying at the pump.
All these mindless idiots in the audience spewing from the mouth need to shut up; I'm so tired of that. Both of these men are correct. We should not be sacrificing lives for oil. But at the same time, can you imagine the incredible unrest and riots in this country if people could not afford gas. Yea, it's easy to say "ride a bike, car pool, take a bus." But the simple truth of the matter is people are not going to do this, they are going to riot.
RON PAUL ; AMERICA IS WAITING FOR YOUR ANSWER, HOW ARE YOU GOING TO CREATE JOBS IF POPULATION OF CHINA IS 1.4 B? CHINESE WORK LIKE ROBOTS, USA WANT TO KNOW YOUR PLAN?
From my sense, tthe way to solve immigration issues is with stricter enforcement of the law with all employers hiring illegals, and in the government welfare offices. Deny all incentive and crack down on those giving them.
if Mexican citizens can't get any work here without first obtaining legitimate US citizenship, can't just get easy jobs alongside other illegals with no reason to learn english, and can't get any handouts courtesy of US taxpayers, illegal immigration will likely all but stop.
the only thing that concerns me about libertarianism is to get from where we are today to the perfect libertatian society will have a huge effect on the poor and middle class to do it over night there has to be a transition.
15:20 to 15:30 is pretty awsome! He has served our country and military and that's wonderful, but he just said in plain sight that we are there to protect our oil interests. Unbelievable.
The reason I support ron paul is because he supports separating government from business in the sense that no longer is corporatism and corporate welfare a staple of U.S. policy.
@farziran87 Just a reminder - if you live in a closed /semi closed primary state you have to register REPUB in order to vote Ron Paul in the critical primary election. That is what secures the nominatio so that's where our votes count . A lot of people don't realize that about the closed sates - those states are;AZ,CO,DE,CT,FL,MA,MD,PA,NY,SD,WV,UT,OR,NE,CA,LA,KY maybe a few more . Do not be disappointed at the polls if you are a DEM and can't vote as I was the 1st time it happened to me
@Kluckad Could be but the sites I have gone to say it is an open primary in Tn - online sources not the best and there are a lot of loopholes . Some are semi open , some semi closed , some have closed caucus just for REPUBS , etc - so the bottom line is if you REALLY want to be assured of voting for Ron Paul in the primary ( which is SO critical for the nomination , people ), just register REPUB and dont take a chance - you can always change it back after he wins the election, right ? : )
@farziran87 So you say. But Ron Paul and Austrian "economics" advocate denying us our rights to issue promissory obligations free of exploitation. They *call* this "free markets." They say they projected the present failure. That too is a lie, because the higher rates of interest they advocate could only have exacerbated the failure. They advocate the very usurpations of "banking" which comprise "the Fed," *only as if* those usurpations would be any different with a different sign on the bank.
Its too bad that as people are waking up the media is shutting people down... every time I see the Republican Candidates they always show only Romney, santorum, and gingrich. THEY DON'T EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE HIS EXISTENCE!
imaclay777 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Go, Paul! It's all about the delegates! Go, Paul!
Search "Making Friends Through Ron Paul" on Facebook Groups and join the American R[ƎVO˩]UTION! Ron Paul 2012!
TintedGrayBlue 1 month ago
Thank you John Stossel.
FRANKYMOOK 1 month ago
they forgot the teleprompters for Obama...
swiftkickinthaass 1 month ago 3
Ron Paul knows what ills this country, and it's a cancer in washington and it's roots go deep through news media , FED and the military industrial complex
swiftkickinthaass 1 month ago
Back when I was stuck in the false left-right paradigm I hated John Stossel. Now I think he's pretty cool.
RagaDagga 2 months ago 3
Revolution/Constitution.
coolmamac 2 months ago
12:54 : Jedi Ron Paul uses the force
Synchr0nix 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this guy debating ron paul isint seriuos ive heard him on alex jones show and russia today
his actually a good guy working on exposing 911
chan00chap 2 months ago
Comment removed
chan00chap 2 months ago
BEST. VIDEO.!!!
jonh2o 2 months ago
HUH? HOW DID I MISS THIS??
stevemcgee99 3 months ago
@TinyMcLarge
actually, socialist & communist are the same thing ~ letting ppl go homeless, and sending aid to israel are both wrong.
Eye2EyeIIIV 3 months ago
Let's make sure Ron Paul wins so he can OWN Obama's socialist hide!
Eye2EyeIIIV 3 months ago 14
If you were to put Ron Paul next to Obama America would realize Obama doesn't really say anything of substance. Dr. Paul would look way more intelligent and he would actually get fair time to answer questions haha in reality if republicans want to win put RP on the ticket. Who knows maybe all these corrupt assholes would realize if they can make more in a free market system than just extorting the world like leeches.
devboy3 3 months ago 9
Why are people saying that with Ron Paul's foreign policy we wouldn't have gone into World War II?
1. There was a clear threat to our national security (Pearl Harbor)
2. FDR went to Congress, presented his case and followed the Constitution by asking the Congress to declare war
3.We proceeded to go in there, go all out, won it, and got it over with
This is how exactly Ron Paul sees how you should treat threats to our national security.
wootfiles 3 months ago 3
You have the strength you do because you did not waste money trying to take over the world. Instead by promoting peace, you give a good example and prosper with a true economy. If a prosperous country falters, it will be because it does not follow the principles and path that lead it to that point. The roman, the soviets, The Turkish, The Egyptians, the English empires all fell because they spread themselves to thin and forgot how they became wealthy and prosperous. Bring sanity back to USA!
vincentca2004 4 months ago
PPL HOPING AND PRAYING THAT HE WILL WIN WONT GET THINGS DONE. Lets take Action protests outside of bilderburg meetings letting know that dont mess with ron paul if he dies we will know what happen and we should intimidate them and call their names out one by one . Lets take action so he wont end up like jfk and rfk. Add me on facebook type jbauer364@gmail.com
so we can do this besides many other things I have around 300 ppl. If u r
ashamed being in a movement just make a new facebook accou
22AgentBauer369 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL PEOPLE WHO SUPPORT FREEDOM FROM BULLSHIT VOTE FOR RON PAUL IN THE REPUBLICAN PRIMARY 2012!!!!! FREEDOM!! IF YOU DONT VOTE AGAINST THEM THEN YOU SUPPORT THE ONES WHO ENSLAVE YOU!!!! FREE YOURSELF AND YOUR BROTHER, CHECK OUT RON PAUL!!!!
zentricky69 4 months ago
There is NO authority in the Constitution to "defend" oil!
iluvpoliticzz 4 months ago
I worked in the food industry for years starting in 1968. I can tell you straight the quality of food and what does into the can is a joke today . in 1969 quality control was 10x better than it was in 2003. FACT. People should do a google search on new laws that now allow poisons in the food along with groth hormones.. My famlies fav . Veg. was corn Now none of us can it that crap in a can. Birdseye coolwhip that used to be thrown out if open when going threw freezing process is now ok
Nemesis1ism 4 months ago
John "The Stache" Stossel
you da man
CivitasUltraAporia 4 months ago
I cannot wait until he wins the nomination. He's going to stomp Obama into the ground.
housecry 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Yeah vote Ron Paul! GO USA!
truendymion 4 months ago
@16.53.... moooo
sleepytweeker 4 months ago
He is the wisest man i have ever listened to and i hope his (the founders) ideas will finally win
Dieter6666 4 months ago
My question to Ron Paul would be: Why do our politicians and elected officials, including yourself, always refer to our system of government as a "democracy" when the founding fathers clearly taught us that we are a "free republic"? In the pledge of allegiance it says, "And to the REPUBLIC for which it stands" not, and to the "democracy" for which it stands. And BTW...I am a Ron Paul supporter all the way...except for the democracy thing...LOL
amzuel420 4 months ago
yeah because without government everything would be fine... that's called magic beans...
Darusdei 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Darusdei Who said anything about not having government?
Jononutoob 4 months ago
@Darusdei hes not for getting rid of the government. that would be crazy. he is for LIMITED government
Hawkeye12119 4 months ago
I agree somewhat with Paul on the foreign policy stuff, but Schaeffer had a point. The audience shouldn't have just booed him. Personally, I believe there should be a minimum amount of international responsibility to stop it if some dictator wants to kill 1 million of his own people, and we'd need some bases worldwide for that. Someone would have to stop that guy. Too much of Paul's foreign policy and if another Hitler shows up, we wont do anything about it.
iluvatar003 4 months ago
@iluvatar003 Yeah that policy hsa been sooooooo succesful. Vietnam, Korea, Panama, Iraq, etc. Name one time such a policy was a success. Let's get over the pretty sounding theories and go by what actually works. Defense of National borders and our constitution.
firestrings272 4 months ago
@firestrings272 WWII it worked. I know most those policies have been unsuccessful and WWII had mixed success. That isn't my point. The point is I don't think it is right for all the nations of the world to watch people die when a dictator shows up. The world is much more intergrated now than it was in 1776. Some things about the constitution might have to be amended.
iluvatar003 4 months ago
@iluvatar003 The only reason we entered WW2 was because we were attacked at Pearl Harbor by the Japanese who was part of the Axis powers you idiot. Being attacked and pre-emptively attacking are two totally different things and it's no secret that all the countries the US has intervened in has been at the interest of major corporations, oil and opium. Why didn't the US act during the Rwanda massacre3?Why hasn't Cuba been invaded?Why hasn't North Korea? Get over your moral idealism,it's bullshit.
firestrings272 4 months ago
@firestrings272 You are not telling me anything I don't know. And regardless of why we got into WWII (we were helping Britain before we got in it), it doesnt change the fact that it did work. I think we should have done something about Rwanda. Cuba has been invaded, stupid, remember the Bay of Pigs? (which didn't work) . NK hasn't been invaded because of political reasons. So what? Moral idealism is not bullshit. And I think we have a responsibility to do something if genocides start.
iluvatar003 4 months ago
@iluvatar003 Then why didn't the US step in to help Rwanda?Go back to high school and take a history lesson, dumbass, the US was not engaged in war until Pearl Harbor.Cuba was not invaded you stupid piece of shit, the Bay of Pigs was an operation led by CIA assets not by the US military you dumbass, get your facts straight.You think you have a right to tell other countries what to do and how to live?Thast policy has brought deaths and US-friendly dictatorships.Pinochet,the Shah,etc.
firestrings272 4 months ago
@firestrings272 You never heard of Lend-Lease or the end of the Neutrality Acts or when the US and UK jointly occupied Iceland and Greenland in 1940-41. Don't argue with me about history, and don't insult me. The Bay of Pigs was a US-CIA operation; I don't see how that doesn't count as an invasion. We supported the Shah and Pinochet for bad reasons yes (for Cold War reasons). WE DON'T HAVE TO KEEP DOING THAT.... THINGS CAN CHANGE.
iluvatar003 4 months ago
@firestrings272 cont. Like I said, I think we should have went into Rwanda. And yes, If a dictator wants to kill 1 million of his own people, then yes we should tell them how to live.
iluvatar003 4 months ago
@iluvatar003 cont2 But then we should leave very quickly. It's turns out bad when the US occupies. We did it as best as it probably could have been done when we left W. Germany, but the Cold War prevented us from removing our bases. We aren't really in that situation anymore, so our policy can be revised. Too many people see those other occupations as either just good or bad, & dont look for the nuances, finding out exactly where they went wrong or what can be fixed 4 later..
iluvatar003 4 months ago
@iluvatar003 Notice how everything you said has been a big"if" or a "should have" you have said nothing factual or empirical to justify your ridiculous ideology except the notion of "I think it's the right thing to do". When you grow up and learn that life and especially politics is about an interest, you'll understand why the War in Iraq happened. Why the country of Panama was devastated with so much death and why afghanistan has been so important to the world powers.
firestrings272 4 months ago
@firestrings272 When I grow up? I know why that stuff happened. I also know there have been cases when occupation works, i.e. S. Korea, Japan, W Germany & Austria. I disagreed w/the War in Iraq. I said there should be intl responsiblity if genocides start... then you started talking about Panama, Chile, Vietnam, Afghanistan and NK when there weren't genocides there. You missed my point entirely, then called me my beliefs were ridiculous. It can be done right, and I think we should start.
iluvatar003 4 months ago
@iluvatar003 Oh I see, so you're saying only if genocide is occuring? Again.....what was that little event that happened in Rwanda? Or how about the genocide in Tibet? Or how about the massacre in Darfur? Where was the moral police? Grow up, no counry is going to use it's forces unless there is an economic interest involved.
firestrings272 4 months ago
@firestrings272 The UN at least tried to do something in Rwanda but they had too few troops. Clinton and Albright had their thumps up their ass the whole time. Economic interests and fears of WWIII prevented anything in Tibet. And Darfur was a waste, no one really cared. You might be right in that a country wont do anything unless economic interest is involved (which is a overly cynical view as it is not always true). But a country policy can be revised, which is all I want.
iluvatar003 4 months ago
@iluvatar003 It's not cynicism, it's reality. And who are you to determine the destiny of a sovereign nation? Before you go trying to save the world I suggest you look at what has happened to the Alaskan eskimos over the years, the GA School of the Americas training program for latin american soldiers, the environmental destruction of Ecuadorian land by Texaco, the toxic waste by Ford that has killed thousands of US citizens. Where's your morality regarding that?
firestrings272 4 months ago
@firestrings272 Your plan of just leaving these nations so that corporations can run willy-nilly over them doesn't seem much better to me. The destiny of a sovereign nation is up to them, unless the leader wants to kill half of it off. There have to be some limits to a policy. I thought genocide was an agreeable limit. I guess not. I guess it's too conceited of me to expect that a nation not kill its own people. Apparently genocide is a mandatory part of a nation's destiny.
iluvatar003 4 months ago
@iluvatar003 What the fuck do you think the American Civil war was? That was genocide but it had to happen. Neither you or anybody can decide what a sovereign nation can or cannot do. So what about all the domestic problems you conveniently ignore?Problems that affect all of us and are just as bad. Take care of your own house before you start worrying about your neighbor's.
firestrings272 4 months ago
@firestrings272 The Civil War was a genocide? Now who needs a history class.... Not every war is a genocide. And domestic problems? The issue was foreign policy, not domestic issues. I don't want the US intervening in other nation's domestic stuff except if they cause genocide. That way it can at least be a better force of benevolence and non-interference worldwide. Paul's solution for social problems is to keep govt out of it, which I assume u agree with. I'm not gonna argue w/u on that.
iluvatar003 4 months ago
@iluvatar003 "it's too conceited of me to expect that a nation not kill its own people" Was that not your definition of Genocide? Thats what happens in ALL Civil Wars.Why did NATO attack Lybia? There was no genocide there just a civil war. So according to you foreign problems are more important than the domestic problems of a nation?You don't care about America? I find it very sad when a person feels some sort of moral obligation to protect the world while seeing their own country going to shit.
firestrings272 4 months ago
@firestrings272 Look up the word "Genocide" in Websters if you don't understand it. The Civil War was not a genocide, nor was it my definition of one. Civil wars/state execution arent genocide, don't act like I said it was. No, I didnt say foreign problems were more important than domestic. I said we weren't discussing domestic problems, and I wanted you to stop changing the subject. Why are you asking me about Libya? I said what I think US policy should be, and you're bringing up NATO.
iluvatar003 4 months ago
@iluvatar003,
"If a dictator wants to kill 1 million of his own people, then yes we should tell them how to live. "
Ok, YOU pay for it. I'm not willing to. How about that?
ftorresgamez 4 months ago
@ftorresgamez That's fine.
iluvatar003 4 months ago
@iluvatar003
"That's fine."
And that's it, right? No calls for Congress to take my hard-earned cash and use it to bomb brown people, do we agree? Iluvatar003, the problem with trying to save everybody is that you're bound to end up on the wrong side. You may want to stop a "genocide," but you risk committing a different genocide to achieve this, as you are bound invevitably to choose sides. Who is to say which side is the most righteous? You? Me? Your cat? Think about it.
ftorresgamez 4 months ago
@ftorresgamez We agree on no bombing brown people. We are also probably going to be on the wrong side if we support puppet dictators. But I think the righteous side is more likely the side being slaughtered. Not everyone is righteous and mistakes can be made, but there is no situation I can conceive where it would be better off to just let a genocide happen just because it will cost some money to stop it.
iluvatar003 4 months ago
@iluvatar003,
"But I think the righteous side is more likely the side being slaughtered. "
Maybe. However, there's always the likeliness of error in judgment when choosing sides. Imagine I see you fightng another fellow and I intervene to help the person who is clearly, to me, on the losing side, and I shoot YOU. While you are laying there, dying, would you still think my judgment was just as sound as yours? I would bet you would not, except your and mine were not different at all.
ftorresgamez 4 months ago
@ftorresgamez Hypothetical situations are hard to debate. In a war, there's gonna be collateral damage. If I got shot but the genocide ended, I guess I'd feel better... but I'd be dead...
iluvatar003 4 months ago
Comment removed
Federalism24 4 months ago
Poor Tony Shaeffer - he keeps saying "for better or for worse" - isn't it obvious he doesn't base his ideas on what's best, but rather on how he was brought up?
katydig 4 months ago
LOL I saw that first kid that asked a question in another video taken in the streets of NYC. He's a 9/11 family member who is a truther.
gutzs 4 months ago
I never even heard of this (of course)!
outthereonalimb 4 months ago
The Obama actor is so spot-on with his acting!
ps2nolimits 4 months ago
Stossel is the man
TheDougass 4 months ago
wow.. i never thought about it. why should future generations go to war because of some deal some old doods 80 years ago made with another country? this man never ceases to englighten me.
VaticanIscariot 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
*** Black THIS Out Moneybomb – October 19th ***
Inspired by the mainstream media's biased reporting of Ron Paul.
Pledge at BlackTHISOut[dot]com
Please spread the word!
NJensenI 5 months ago
Even if Ron Paul didn't win and Obama did, I would give "almost anything" to see Ron Paul win the Republican nomination just to see him debate Obama Face-to-Face.
Aldenissin 5 months ago 3
Ron Paul 2012, but please ban the "Yeah" and "Boo" (hear "ahh" and "moo") cackling girl in the audience!
TheSalCuri 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
911, was a inside job. All evidence points to it!
michaelsterling37 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CONSTITUTION DAY MONEYBOMB ON SATURDAY, SEPT 17, 2011. Please consider donating and help Dr. Paul's message get across to the American people without mainstream media distortion. America needs Ron Paul - we can all help! Ron Paul 2012!
theleemeister 5 months ago
WINNING STRATEGY:
In order for Dr.Paul to win, HE NEEDS THE PRIMARY. That's the toughest part.
IF YOU WANT TO VOTE IN PRIMARY YOU HAVE TO BE REGISTERED REPUBLICAN! If you don't switch parties in time, (3 months ahead in some states) YOU WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO VOTE!!
Switch in time democrats and indepedents! Republicans:GET TO THE PRIMARIES!! ALL OF YOU!!! YOU KNOW WHAT TO DO NOW DO IT!!
Please help spread this message, and also thumb it up when U C these.
Thanks 2 all those helping!!
2eelShmeal 5 months ago 30
love the look on rons face this is just practice for him
88spammer 4 months ago
@88spammer
lol yeah! this is practice for Ron Paul! ;D
Eye2EyeIIIV 3 months ago
Yes shut down everything!! Fire the military !!! No more police"!! No more imcome tax return!! Shut everything make your own food your own computers ah dont forget memorize the constitution ha ha
23josed 6 months ago
The REAL Obama would obliterate WRong Paul in a debate. Reggie Brown was just giving him a warm-up.
Marakulous43 6 months ago
I know this old man wants to go back to the gold standard but can someone explain to me how we are going to find enough gold to support a 17 TRILLION DOLLAR GLOBAL ECONOMY. How I ask you people......HOW??? There's a reason why we have fiat money but unfortunately that's been abused by the worst generation of all time: Baby Boomers
Marakulous43 6 months ago
@Marakulous43
Dear Marakulous43 if you have the respect of your friends and neighbour, when you are in trouble i'm very sure everyone will love to help.People will be lend you a hand and pick you up where you have fall.
geraldchew 5 months ago
@Marakulous43 I think you are misunderstanding a gold standard. There is always enough money no matter how big the economy is if the money is divisible. A fixed quantity of money will just appreciate as the economy grows. So if you have one hundred dollars backed by a gold standard that buys a textbook, over time you will only need 95 for a textbook. You wouldn't be physically carrying around any gold. It would be in a bank and you would just have a note that represents a tangible asset
mjbarrowful 5 months ago 17
Comment removed
Marakulous43 5 months ago
@mjbarrowful Ancient societies have trillions if not 1 quadrillion in gold. If we go to a gold standard you will be in their power. Wake up. You do NOT need gold. You need scarcity. England did not have gold...used wood...tally system and had NO inflation for 800 years.
The problem is Gold costs 600/oz to produce. In a fractional reserve system, that oz is worth 6000-9000 if you have a banking cartel right. Again...gold will NOT work.
seaplaneguy1 4 months ago
@mjbarrowful ok ok but my question is what if we wont get enough gold? Its prices just go up without consequence?
Anarchizer 4 months ago
@mjbarrowful Gold can be manipulated. The market can be cornered easily. All we need is US issued notes, except the amount must be kept in proportion to the amount of trade needed to facilitate.
2eelShmeal 4 months ago
@mjbarrowful infinate growth and consumption is impossible on a finaite planet
jayot33 3 months ago
@Marakulous43 Retard.
Seiku 5 months ago
23:51 Go back to Kenya? Shows the true character WRong Paul supporters
Marakulous43 6 months ago
@Marakulous43 yes because one person said it. So with this logic....the left and their soviet flags want 10 million dead peasant farmers.
ORACLE063 5 months ago
@ORACLE063 Save it! You WRong Paul supporters always want to talk about this Media Industrial Complex and other nonsense. You WRong Paul supporters always mention "Zionists" (which is a code name for Jews) trying to take over the world. You people are simply out of touch with reality.
Marakulous43 5 months ago
@Marakulous43 You do know there are Christian Zionists dont you ???? so how is it a code name for Jews ??? Zionism is a political ideology ,and has no part of religious readings or followings
snaed27 5 months ago
Look at all of these blind sheep
Marakulous43 6 months ago
WRong Paul is living in the wrong year, he's about 235 years behind. Smh.
Marakulous43 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ron paul 2012 !!! just do it america !!!!
alinsatx 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
OMG!
you GOTTA SEE THIS search:
White House Press Announcement turns into Oval Office Frenzy
SAINTCHRISTOPHERV 6 months ago
It's not enough to say "Vote Ron Paul"
PEOPLE NEED TO SWITCH PARTIES 12 WEEKS IN ADVANCE OF THE PRIMARIES IN MOST STATES.
IF YOU DO NOT SWITCH IN TIME YOU CANNOT VOTE IN PRIMARY.
IF YOU ARE NOT REGISTERED REPUBLICAN YOU CANNOT VOTE IN PRIMARY.
IF RON PAUL DOES NOT WIN PRIMARY, NO GENERAL ELECTION ! REGISTER AS A REPUBLICAN. FIND OUT WHEN YOUR STATE HAS PRIMARIES. FIND OUT WHERE AND VOTE VOTE VOTE ! PLEASE !
WE NEED EVERY LAST VOTE ! Copy and paste this everywhere.
2eelShmeal 6 months ago
no blood for oil end the wars!!!!
937kj 6 months ago
3 people either want the Government or corporations running our lives.
Huntington12345678 6 months ago
Comment removed
Huntington12345678 6 months ago
GO TOM!!! :) GOOD QUESTION!
baggytheo 6 months ago
Comment removed
baggytheo 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"In freedom, we can find our answers. - In peace, we can find our prosperity!"
RON PAUL 2012 - Don't forget to register REPUBLICAN to vote!...
...and send Dr. Paul some bucks, if you can!
vechorik 6 months ago
Geeky looking guy?
Drag queen Gulianni says he's heard some strange things about 9/11....like the government conspiracy theory on what happened.
MrStevilKneivel 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey, America, wake the fuck up!! Ron Paul would make a great president!
bermudaguy1 6 months ago
SpaceX vs Nasa
SpaceX=$1,000/lb
NASA= $10,000/lb
government= EPIC FAIL
imatruthaddict 6 months ago
Civil liberties have to do with economics as well.
imatruthaddict 6 months ago
Colonel Schaffer is completely controlled by the collectivists....the free market finds an alternative with $10/gallon GAS not Oil....$10/bbl oil would mean about $.50/gallon gas, what a rube.
We have TONS of natural resources in the states and in countries we trade with...we don't need to go to war for cheaper prices, we need to innovate an discover to bring down prices.
imatruthaddict 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
15:24 I love that audience!
1danyol1 6 months ago
Comment removed
1danyol1 6 months ago
I CANT BELIVE MY EYES I JUST SAW ACTUALLY DIALOGUE AND DEMOCRACY ON FOX O_OU
ola6861 6 months ago
5:21 the kid is like "dude, 2 planes smashing in to each other... badass"
1danyol1 6 months ago
What is up with this audience?
iEatBoneDust 6 months ago
@iEatBoneDust I think Stossel should run for President.
iEatBoneDust 6 months ago
I would opt out and give them ZERO of MY money!! And then I can take care of myself...
gold95 6 months ago
The tuna's already poison...and if you want to keep the right to grow your own food, better vote for Paul.
givebirthathome 6 months ago 2
@givebirthathome U R TOTALLY RIGHT VOTE RP2012=)
ola6861 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Please support Ron Paul..spread the word to friends and family.. the media will try to ignore him...but we the people are Ron's last chance to get the election. HE WILL PUT AN END TO SPENDING TRILLIONS ON WARS and that will be more good news for Americans..more money to create jobs
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
thetruepatriot2012 6 months ago
What we need to do is make it so that government social programs actually function properly and work for the people, not eliminate them all together. Again, this whole idea that government should have no role in peoples lives, goes against the very idea of government. And Ron Paul actually believes he can eliminate the FAA, the Department of Education, of Energy, of Housing and Urban Development; he can just eliminate everything basically! He must have his head in the clouds, itll never happen!
JohnJancar 6 months ago
Ron Paul is too much of an idealist, how does he honestly expect to just eliminate every government program? There is no way he will get congressional support for that. And many government programs are good programs. He just has this idea "get the government out of peoples lives, don't rely on them for anything" and it is all sounds nice, sure, but it just isn't realistic. Neither is not sending troops to back up a country you have a treaty with. If by miracle he wins, he won't change anything.
JohnJancar 6 months ago
@JohnJancar what a awesome defeatist view point, give up without trying. We can get these programs out just as they got them in what can be put in place can also be removed. Nothing is set in stone.
Hotwolf327 6 months ago
@Hotwolf327 But that isn't the answer, the answer is making these programs function properly. I think the Federal government should play a role in peoples lives, a role of service and oversight. We can't just get rid of government, it would never work, human beings are not mature enough to not have an overseer. We need to root out corruption in government, that is the problem, the corruption, not government itself.
JohnJancar 6 months ago
@JohnJancar The point of this nation is the individuality of the states to function on their own while united under the same ideals and law, the constitution, the government isn't suppose to play such a huge role, that has never been the reason for it. It's up to the state and courts and the people to decide.
Hotwolf327 6 months ago
@Hotwolf327 Well every state does function on their own, and each state government has laws and rules that are independent of other states. What the federal government does is provide oversight to state governments. And yes corruption is a huge problem in all levels of government, but the answer is to get rid of the corruption, not get rid of government itself. I honestly don't think the masses are smart enough, or mature enough, to govern themselves, people need "leaders" to lead them.
JohnJancar 6 months ago
@JohnJancar It would be GRADUAL. It can be realistic if people change, which will take generations but either you start somewhere or keep doing like we're doing and all end up screwed. What would you prefer?
iEatBoneDust 6 months ago
@iEatBoneDust Well what about Obama, everyone is complaining that he hasn't changed everything, you said it yourself, change is gradual. And I don't think it's realistic, or sensible, to just eliminate the Federal government. You eliminate some programs, yes. But the Department of Education, of Energy, of Health and Human services, of Commerce, he even wants to eliminate the federal postal service! He wants to eliminate everything basically, there is no way congress would vote for that.
JohnJancar 6 months ago
@JohnJancar the Department of Education we now know is a sham created by unions to help elect Charter into office. We are behind in education because of the department. Most of these serves hinder us then help. The ED is viewed by many as unconstitutional and Ron Paul isn't the first to want it gone.
Hotwolf327 6 months ago
@Hotwolf327 Well I don't think the DoE is responsible for America's poor level of academics. I blame this cultural attitude here, that school sucks, and learning is boring. I blame the media and entertainment for promoting this culture of ignorance and leisure, instead of hard work and knowledge. I blame parents for not instilling a thirst for knowledge and excellence in their kids. I finally blame kids themselves for not being smart or mature enough to take their schooling more seriously.
JohnJancar 6 months ago
@JohnJancar This isn't my quote but sums up our Government nicely "The federal government was merely comprised for really limited reasons - common defense and security, standardization of currency and interstate commerce regulation. That really is it. There is no "general welfare" provision, and there are many quotes on that by the founders, because that would make the Constitution open ended, and that is definitely not what the founder's had in mind in order to secure liberty and freedom."
Hotwolf327 6 months ago
@Hotwolf327 Well I firmly believe that any system of government, whether it is communism, dictatorship, or democracy, in any form, can work, if...if the people in power actually care about their people and seek to serve them. And also, I believe any system of government, in any form, will always become corrupted if the leaders become corrupted, and seek to service themselves instead of the people. So I think if we really want to change things, the only way to do it is root out corrupt people.
JohnJancar 6 months ago
Ron Paul isn't geeky - he's just old and bad ass
chancey1979 6 months ago 2
I HAVE THE OBAMA BLUES
HERE IS THE SONG
CLICK THE LINK
09051961butts 6 months ago
lol ron paul has no notes, and obama has pages of text!!!
xvader123123 7 months ago
Ron Paul has no chance. And he is a fruity fag who can shit out whole waterelons and swallow 14inch cucumbers.
komjong 7 months ago
@komjong
Yessir boyo lets go out to them there polls an vote for thats Bachmenn fella, shell fix alls of ares problems an get us back in lin don here in kentucky, ifs yous don vot bachmenn then you a faggot, cuz you don like em women
Or you could be rational and vote in a consistent conservative like Ron Paul, either way its your choice.
steroidsR4fantastic 7 months ago
@komjong Sounds like Cointell Pro.
TheSilencer1313 6 months ago
I love this guy . GO RON GO !!!!
JuStGrEaTfUl 7 months ago
Already registered just in case, and who knows, the primary might have changed since four years ago. I had to register as a republican so I could vote for Dr. Paul in 2008, and if Ron Paul doesn't win the primary, I'm moving to... well, haven't thought about it yet, but I will lose the little bit of faith left that I have for this country.
Kluckad 7 months ago
haha spoken like a true soldier... for better or for worse
luvbb23 7 months ago
15:20 I agree with the Lt Col
Automobile577 7 months ago
Ron Paul FTW 2012!
thorntongifts 7 months ago
I am a true aethist but I support Ron Paul principles. By changing people's principles, it will in turn change their behavior and hopefull change their attitude and policies in government. Self reliance is something we teach our kids like how to drive, how to cook, how to read a map, how to manage our own finances.. So self reliance is not an old idea. It has been around for a long long time and we already practice it at home with our kids. Ron is advocate we should challenge the status quo.
MrSeriouslynot 7 months ago
So it's ok for us to kill innocent people (including our own troops) to protect our interests? Please God we need Ron Paul 2012.
peaceliberty4all 7 months ago
Dammit don't you people realize that the illegal immergrant is the evil ugly monster! We need a war with mexico and we need it NOW!
o13starsnstripes 8 months ago
I think it's hilarious. Everyone likes to protest the wars because it's the new, hip thing to do, but the second gas prices spike everyone is moaning and groaning that prices are too high. You can't have everything people. Either we go to war, or we pay out the ass. Our "civilized" society just hates to face the fact that people must die for us to continue living the way we do, at least for the time being. They hate even more admitting that they would rather be at war, than paying at the pump.
ImprettysureImright 8 months ago
All these mindless idiots in the audience spewing from the mouth need to shut up; I'm so tired of that. Both of these men are correct. We should not be sacrificing lives for oil. But at the same time, can you imagine the incredible unrest and riots in this country if people could not afford gas. Yea, it's easy to say "ride a bike, car pool, take a bus." But the simple truth of the matter is people are not going to do this, they are going to riot.
ImprettysureImright 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL ; AMERICA IS WAITING FOR YOUR ANSWER, HOW ARE YOU GOING TO CREATE JOBS IF POPULATION OF CHINA IS 1.4 B? CHINESE WORK LIKE ROBOTS, USA WANT TO KNOW YOUR PLAN?
democratsaresmart 8 months ago
If that army officer says "for better and for worse" one more time i´m going to freak out. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAahhhh ..... he just did !
cruisemate 8 months ago
John Stossel just won me over. Wow! What a great show.
ToolFan68 8 months ago
Haha the Nathan guy definitely sings in a metal band by how he holds the mic.
Swemba 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul 2012!!!!!
deercreek4x4 8 months ago
From my sense, tthe way to solve immigration issues is with stricter enforcement of the law with all employers hiring illegals, and in the government welfare offices. Deny all incentive and crack down on those giving them.
if Mexican citizens can't get any work here without first obtaining legitimate US citizenship, can't just get easy jobs alongside other illegals with no reason to learn english, and can't get any handouts courtesy of US taxpayers, illegal immigration will likely all but stop.
prismadew 8 months ago
the only thing that concerns me about libertarianism is to get from where we are today to the perfect libertatian society will have a huge effect on the poor and middle class to do it over night there has to be a transition.
1210catman 8 months ago
It's so hard to believe how many close minded ppl are in this world!!!
iSpeakTruth7 8 months ago
Dow up 47.23
MrGreco2100 8 months ago
everyone on the main fox news network are probably snarling at jon stossel cause he favors ron paul.
torylelandkirgiss 8 months ago
15:20 to 15:30 is pretty awsome! He has served our country and military and that's wonderful, but he just said in plain sight that we are there to protect our oil interests. Unbelievable.
torylelandkirgiss 8 months ago
The chick randomly booing the military guy was pretty fucking annoying. you aren't part of the debate, shut the fuck up while they're talking.
Swazi4 9 months ago
"different ideas" - constitutional values are different ideas? God Bless Us
MartinezCMHS 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Freedom is Ron Paul 2012
katsfanman 9 months ago
Wow, that intro - a wonderful example of how to distort and skew and belittle someone.
The Fox propaganda machine is a beautiful, dark little piece of evil.
writingstoner 9 months ago
This show was a fan pleaser, for sure
takadi 10 months ago
The reason I support ron paul is because he supports separating government from business in the sense that no longer is corporatism and corporate welfare a staple of U.S. policy.
farziran87 10 months ago 20
@farziran87 Just a reminder - if you live in a closed /semi closed primary state you have to register REPUB in order to vote Ron Paul in the critical primary election. That is what secures the nominatio so that's where our votes count . A lot of people don't realize that about the closed sates - those states are;AZ,CO,DE,CT,FL,MA,MD,PA,NY,SD,WV,UT,OR,NE,CA,LA,KY maybe a few more . Do not be disappointed at the polls if you are a DEM and can't vote as I was the 1st time it happened to me
doogleandalix 7 months ago
@doogleandalix Pretty sure TN is also a closed state.
Kluckad 7 months ago
@Kluckad Could be but the sites I have gone to say it is an open primary in Tn - online sources not the best and there are a lot of loopholes . Some are semi open , some semi closed , some have closed caucus just for REPUBS , etc - so the bottom line is if you REALLY want to be assured of voting for Ron Paul in the primary ( which is SO critical for the nomination , people ), just register REPUB and dont take a chance - you can always change it back after he wins the election, right ? : )
doogleandalix 7 months ago
@farziran87 So you say. But Ron Paul and Austrian "economics" advocate denying us our rights to issue promissory obligations free of exploitation. They *call* this "free markets." They say they projected the present failure. That too is a lie, because the higher rates of interest they advocate could only have exacerbated the failure. They advocate the very usurpations of "banking" which comprise "the Fed," *only as if* those usurpations would be any different with a different sign on the bank.
mikemontagne 6 months ago
go RON!! Kick some Kenyan ass!!
defkon99 10 months ago
RON PAUL PAPER Affidavit BALLOTS!!!
FreedomFinder 10 months ago
RON PAUL 2012!!! <3
FreedomFinder 10 months ago
Reggie Brown is an awesome impersonator of Obama lol
aytherix 10 months ago
@aytherix reggie brown is FUCKING HILARIOUS...he does just as good impersonation of barry seotoro as Will ferrel does of governor bush wacker.
chronofusion 9 months ago
"No one has the right to impose their views on someone else..." uh...what? how would debating work?
MrTrilliondollarman 10 months ago