Oooh I remember when I was in kindergarten, it was do damn fun!!! We were always playing and coloring and having fun and eating breakfast together. And I even have some faint memories of sleeping outside in the winter, just like those kids did, though it was only till we were about a year and a half. Man, I miss those times
..pleasure to see the pure, honest relations and interactions from the early education engaged by the edutainment activities... You all really deserve the prosperity in Sweden...
This has helped me hugely with one of my assignments. It's based on early years, policies, practitioners and the government. Can someone please help me out, giving me advantages and disadvantages of practitioners?? I'm trying to find some online, but I'm struggling to get any answers. :/
I'm from Norway, and I was an exchange student in the US 10 years ago. I found American high school to be not very encouraging of independent thinking. Most exchange students I talked to agreed that American school was much less demanding than school in their own countries.
@Daan892 It's probably because Swedish and English are both Germanic languages, as is Norweigan, Danish, Icelandic, German and Dutch. A lot of words and grammar has been borrowed between the languages so it comes more naturally to us. So it's not strange that we're 'good' at it.
@Daan892 Yes, but Finns are just awesome in general. Also, they have to learn Swedish in school alongside their own language (since Finland has two offical languages), so that might be the reason why English is easier for them.
Wow this is so much more organized than the U.S. Many children here are simply left to strangers practically or there siblings who are to young to be caring for them.
I agree that the process that this Sweden school has is better, in a lot of ways, than what we have in the USA. However, I am not sure that these children need to be at school ALL day; so very long, it seems. The US tends to "dummy-down" our children; Sweden seems to work with each child as an individual. I have a child wth Autism, so I don't know how Sweden teaches these children; Eugenics? These people may be controversial in regards to politics, but not this way of teaching...
IMHO many Swedish parents put their kids into nursery too soon (e.g. aged 1) and for too long (5 days/wk, 7-8 hrs/day). What began as an exception has become the norm.
Our child started at 2 yrs for 3 days/wk, 7 hrs/day. The Swedish govt. pays us to look after our child 2 days a week, plus there's parental leave money and the right to take time off from work. When our child reaches 4, we might increase nursery time, but I believe that home (whenever possible) is best for a small child!
@TheReliquary What do you mean too soon? I was one and I turned out just fine... I was a sleepy kid and the other girls would pretend I was a doll, dress me up and push me around in a stroller ;)
@WWC4Kuhns The eugenics program? That was a VERY long time ago. No one believes in it, talks about it or even seems to remember it today. Literally no one, not even the elders. Today, it's all about embracing children with special needs and making sure they participate in regular activities with other children as much as possible, so they won't feel left behind or excluded.
I believe in the Swedish system , I enrolled my daughter into pre-school and their main focus is drama, culture, singing, walking in the forest.... this is what a expect a child to do. When the time comes to read and so on then she'll do that, but right now she is just gonna learn to get on with other kids and sing and dance, communicate....
I take UK primary teachers to Africa because they are so far behing the curve in this respect. It's sad, but we can make a huge Impact. It is such an important time in a child's development. They must be looked after properly.
Its all well & good to note that Americas system is too adversarial. But WHY is it that way?
Sweden's a relatively homogenous country. That eases the social tension. Also, for half the 20th Century Sweden implemented a program of eugenics.
Im certainly not advocating eugenics or genocide. But Swedens isolation from the 3rd world is a factor. For the same reason, Americas K-12 schools are actually pretty solid once you get away from the major urban areas.
Eugenics usually focuses on eliminating people with "special needs" and I see just as many such people in Stockholm as in say, the UK. So if there was a eugenics program, it can't have been much good!
Whilst not as heterogeneous as the USA, Sweden has had the highest rate of immigration in the EU and accepts many more asylum seekers than other EU states. Yet it succeeds in implementing, even imposing this style of education on children from Afghanistan and Iraq, etc. with good results.
IIRC, USA & Sweden both forced about 60k sterilizations in the 20th Century. Sweden's population was less than 1/20th of the USA.
Geography & politics also limited 20th century Swedish immigration. Todays immigrants might eventually make Swedens consensual society more adversarial. Cant think of a single historical example suggesting otherwise.
BTW, thanks for the civil response on such a touchy subject. I have nothing against Sweden. Theres a lot to learn from them. This video is a good counterpoint to those who would have us emulate the cram school systems of East Asia.
Thanks for the comment you left on my Baby Einstein video. You should check out the reply I made to myself if you haven't seen it yet. I actually came across this video of yours a couple weeks ago and thought it was amazing! It really makes me want to raise my children in another country when that time comes. I think the US is too concerned about passing tests at the age of 3 and less concerned about what and how the children are actually learning. It's really sad.
I was telling a friend about this video and she told me Sweden has armed guard out in public all the time. Is this true? Here in the USA we don't have the army out with guns all the time. How does this affect the children if you do have Army men out and about?
It's true that police carry guns but I think your friend may be mixing Sweden up with some other country (perhaps Switzerland?).
I hardly ever see the police here and never see soldiers. In fact, it's a bit of a problem because a lot of people would like more police to be around.
I agree that arming the police is problematic because it escalates situations and distances the police from the ordinary people they're supposed to protect (cf. the US?). Unarmed police (as in the UK) is best imho.
Well our police are armed but our military isn't on our streets 24/7. I have often wondered how the UK is able to protect citizens without being armed? My friend had visited Europe and I agree, she is mixing Sweden up with Switzerland.
I confess I'm no expert on the "should we arm the police" question - I just go with my gut feeling (like most Brits) that arming the police is a regrettable step that increases the danger & threat to both police & innocent citizens.
Boosting the number of police is more effective - and that's something Sweden needs to look at. Having said that, the biggest sources of "danger" to our kids are not necessarily police matters.
I mean, police protecting citizens from robbers and murders. From drug dealers and rapist. From kidnappers and porn. The stuff you mention are more for governments and society to do something about. Do you know what I mean? Maybe the government, citizens, and law enforcement should work together to change things that need changing. How do you know adding more police is more effective? Are there stats?
I know of no stats, it's just what police officers themselves say. A criminal with or without a gun has little chance of evading the law if there's a lot of police manpower & good surveillance.
The UK govt. has (or had) a slogan, "tough on crime; tough on the causes of crime" & I reckon that's a sound approach - to tackle both simultaneously.
Hence the value of excellent schools in forming upstanding citizens who don't do drugs etc.!
the uk police does not need guns our citizens don't carry guns all they need is a taser gun to take a criminal down ALIVE,but if some criminals had guns then we do have armed police to deal with them.if the police haven't got a gun then they wont be able to shot anyone for a small offence like the Americans do
I agree with bouncyboy2 - armed police are best as a last resort.
Swedish police routinely carry guns and it makes them seem arrogant, unapproachable, threatening. Despite their guns, they're less effective than the British police.
The average British PC is easy to talk to and shows some respect for the people he/she serves. Hek, when they pulled me over for speeding, they still called me "sir" whilst giving me a good old bollocking!
While I agree that there are situations where a tazer gun would be preferable to a normal handgun, Police tend not to regard tazers as a weapon and handle these weapons more frivolously. Swedish Police were granted pepperspray a few years ago, I believe, and have used these nearly on whim where the situation was not threatening but where the person would not comply or obey. I know that this is also the case with tazers in the U.S of A and, I'm sure, in other places such as Britain.
Police should therefor refrain from violence and rather use alternative methods and would more readily do so were they only issued a handgun. The right training is paramount, of course.
Oooh I remember when I was in kindergarten, it was do damn fun!!! We were always playing and coloring and having fun and eating breakfast together. And I even have some faint memories of sleeping outside in the winter, just like those kids did, though it was only till we were about a year and a half. Man, I miss those times
PoutchieWhoou 5 hours ago
Just too bad the budget cuts makes the school worse and worse just so thet the liberals can lower the taxes...
The reading is a much lower not than a few years ago. No matter what system you have you need money to teach out in a good way.
SWEmanque 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
..pleasure to see the pure, honest relations and interactions from the early education engaged by the edutainment activities... You all really deserve the prosperity in Sweden...
nickolozi 1 month ago
Comment removed
nickolozi 1 month ago
This has helped me hugely with one of my assignments. It's based on early years, policies, practitioners and the government. Can someone please help me out, giving me advantages and disadvantages of practitioners?? I'm trying to find some online, but I'm struggling to get any answers. :/
rachm1991 2 months ago
Thanks for sharing this video clip. This is so useful and indeed, educational.
insomniacgrace 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
it is good for children to enjoy and learn at the same time.
dayspeace 3 months ago
learning while playing is a good method
guyonfire87 8 months ago
I'm from Norway, and I was an exchange student in the US 10 years ago. I found American high school to be not very encouraging of independent thinking. Most exchange students I talked to agreed that American school was much less demanding than school in their own countries.
winstono75 1 year ago
Can someone tell me why many Scandinavians are good in English? (unlike my people)
Daan892 1 year ago
@Daan892 It's probably because Swedish and English are both Germanic languages, as is Norweigan, Danish, Icelandic, German and Dutch. A lot of words and grammar has been borrowed between the languages so it comes more naturally to us. So it's not strange that we're 'good' at it.
fnumpy 1 year ago
@fnumpy Finnish is not a Germanic language and yet many Finns are good in English.
Daan892 1 year ago
@Daan892 Yes, but Finns are just awesome in general. Also, they have to learn Swedish in school alongside their own language (since Finland has two offical languages), so that might be the reason why English is easier for them.
fnumpy 1 year ago
@fnumpy I already knew Finland's official languages before you told me but that never occured to me. Thank you.
Daan892 1 year ago
@Daan892 we start learning english in grade one. (7yrs)
dedde77 1 year ago
@dedde77 Most of my people (Indonesians) learn English early too but we're still suck. You should hear speak English.
Daan892 1 year ago
@Daan892 Subtitles on movies and TV is the secret :)
alexiuzzz 1 year ago 3
@alexiuzzz There's no language dubbing in Scandinavia?
Daan892 1 year ago
@Daan892 No, neither is it in denmark, norway and holland, which are the countries in europe who speak the best english.
I ve never understood why most countries dub movies. Totally destroys them aswell :)
alexiuzzz 1 year ago
Wow this is so much more organized than the U.S. Many children here are simply left to strangers practically or there siblings who are to young to be caring for them.
EmOhLee12345 1 year ago
I agree that the process that this Sweden school has is better, in a lot of ways, than what we have in the USA. However, I am not sure that these children need to be at school ALL day; so very long, it seems. The US tends to "dummy-down" our children; Sweden seems to work with each child as an individual. I have a child wth Autism, so I don't know how Sweden teaches these children; Eugenics? These people may be controversial in regards to politics, but not this way of teaching...
WWC4Kuhns 2 years ago
IMHO many Swedish parents put their kids into nursery too soon (e.g. aged 1) and for too long (5 days/wk, 7-8 hrs/day). What began as an exception has become the norm.
Our child started at 2 yrs for 3 days/wk, 7 hrs/day. The Swedish govt. pays us to look after our child 2 days a week, plus there's parental leave money and the right to take time off from work. When our child reaches 4, we might increase nursery time, but I believe that home (whenever possible) is best for a small child!
TheReliquary 2 years ago 2
@TheReliquary What do you mean too soon? I was one and I turned out just fine... I was a sleepy kid and the other girls would pretend I was a doll, dress me up and push me around in a stroller ;)
MyPineappleDream 10 months ago
@TheReliquary it must remain remain with less non 3rd world people or else the quality of sweden will go down..end multikulti now,it has failed.
sheyon1000 4 days ago
@WWC4Kuhns The eugenics program? That was a VERY long time ago. No one believes in it, talks about it or even seems to remember it today. Literally no one, not even the elders. Today, it's all about embracing children with special needs and making sure they participate in regular activities with other children as much as possible, so they won't feel left behind or excluded.
erinra 1 year ago
@WWC4Kuhns there are special schools for autistic children in sweden
herrbanana 11 months ago
@WWC4Kuhns Its possible even you're child could get a personal care assistent. for free ofcorse.
Balticsea89 2 months ago
I believe in the Swedish system , I enrolled my daughter into pre-school and their main focus is drama, culture, singing, walking in the forest.... this is what a expect a child to do. When the time comes to read and so on then she'll do that, but right now she is just gonna learn to get on with other kids and sing and dance, communicate....
methuselus 2 years ago 9
haha good days!
jak0bz 2 years ago 6
I take UK primary teachers to Africa because they are so far behing the curve in this respect. It's sad, but we can make a huge Impact. It is such an important time in a child's development. They must be looked after properly.
ImpactTeachers 2 years ago 8
Its all well & good to note that Americas system is too adversarial. But WHY is it that way?
Sweden's a relatively homogenous country. That eases the social tension. Also, for half the 20th Century Sweden implemented a program of eugenics.
Im certainly not advocating eugenics or genocide. But Swedens isolation from the 3rd world is a factor. For the same reason, Americas K-12 schools are actually pretty solid once you get away from the major urban areas.
HuellsJewels 2 years ago 8
Eugenics usually focuses on eliminating people with "special needs" and I see just as many such people in Stockholm as in say, the UK. So if there was a eugenics program, it can't have been much good!
Whilst not as heterogeneous as the USA, Sweden has had the highest rate of immigration in the EU and accepts many more asylum seekers than other EU states. Yet it succeeds in implementing, even imposing this style of education on children from Afghanistan and Iraq, etc. with good results.
TheReliquary 2 years ago
IIRC, USA & Sweden both forced about 60k sterilizations in the 20th Century. Sweden's population was less than 1/20th of the USA.
Geography & politics also limited 20th century Swedish immigration. Todays immigrants might eventually make Swedens consensual society more adversarial. Cant think of a single historical example suggesting otherwise.
HuellsJewels 2 years ago 8
BTW, thanks for the civil response on such a touchy subject. I have nothing against Sweden. Theres a lot to learn from them. This video is a good counterpoint to those who would have us emulate the cram school systems of East Asia.
But NY & London will never be Stockholm.
HuellsJewels 2 years ago 9
very well said!!!!!
bugsylyly 2 years ago 7
-sigh-... I wonder IF my fellow Americans will learn to get it right like this. Stop crapping out kids would be my first advice.
bboner9 3 years ago 9
MondoBeno wrote:
"While teaching Special Ed in New York, I used to email teachers in Sweden to find out where we were going wrong. Here's what I found:
1. The population of Sweden is smaller. Couples have fewer kids. You don't have 5 boys with the same mother and different (absent) fathers.
2. Parents are more austere when it comes to spending.
3. You pay high taxes to pay for top day care.
4. The diet is stricter with less junk. I admire Sweden. Whatever they do, it keeps everyone safe."
TheReliquary 3 years ago 3
i am swedish!
Jag e svensk
saracoollove123 3 years ago 2
so?
Iceye1990 3 years ago 5
jag har fått nyheterna som du inte är ok svensk?
om du var dig skulle förstår men, kanske skitas du
joshman94 3 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
тћіѕ іѕпт ƒаκє арраяєптℓч іƒ υ сорч раѕтє тћіѕ то тєп рєорℓє іп тћє тћє ηєχт тшo міпυтєѕ чоυ шіℓℓ ћаνє тћє вєѕт đач оƒ чоυя ℓіƒє томояяош чоυ шіℓℓ єітћєя gєт а κіѕѕ оя вє аѕκєđ оυт вυт іƒ чоυ вяєаκ тћіѕ сћаіп пoтћіпg вađ шіℓℓ ћаррєп іп чоυя яоом топіgћт ѕo đoпт шoяяч!
Barbra32321 3 years ago 3
Thanks for the comment you left on my Baby Einstein video. You should check out the reply I made to myself if you haven't seen it yet. I actually came across this video of yours a couple weeks ago and thought it was amazing! It really makes me want to raise my children in another country when that time comes. I think the US is too concerned about passing tests at the age of 3 and less concerned about what and how the children are actually learning. It's really sad.
fuzzygreyzebra 3 years ago 10
I was telling a friend about this video and she told me Sweden has armed guard out in public all the time. Is this true? Here in the USA we don't have the army out with guns all the time. How does this affect the children if you do have Army men out and about?
mamangel39 3 years ago 8
It's true that police carry guns but I think your friend may be mixing Sweden up with some other country (perhaps Switzerland?).
I hardly ever see the police here and never see soldiers. In fact, it's a bit of a problem because a lot of people would like more police to be around.
I agree that arming the police is problematic because it escalates situations and distances the police from the ordinary people they're supposed to protect (cf. the US?). Unarmed police (as in the UK) is best imho.
TheReliquary 3 years ago
Well our police are armed but our military isn't on our streets 24/7. I have often wondered how the UK is able to protect citizens without being armed? My friend had visited Europe and I agree, she is mixing Sweden up with Switzerland.
digimastr101 3 years ago 10
The UK police are at least as effective as any other police force. But what do you mean by "protect citizens"?
The police can't protect kids from:
* asthma caused by vehicle exhausts
* advertising that permeates their mental environment & exploits them
* bullying and violence in school
* exams & teaching systems that limit their potential and destroy the joy of learning
* toxic food
* badly planned urban environments
This is the protection I want to see!
TheReliquary 3 years ago
I confess I'm no expert on the "should we arm the police" question - I just go with my gut feeling (like most Brits) that arming the police is a regrettable step that increases the danger & threat to both police & innocent citizens.
Boosting the number of police is more effective - and that's something Sweden needs to look at. Having said that, the biggest sources of "danger" to our kids are not necessarily police matters.
TheReliquary 3 years ago
I mean, police protecting citizens from robbers and murders. From drug dealers and rapist. From kidnappers and porn. The stuff you mention are more for governments and society to do something about. Do you know what I mean? Maybe the government, citizens, and law enforcement should work together to change things that need changing. How do you know adding more police is more effective? Are there stats?
digimastr101 3 years ago 7
I know of no stats, it's just what police officers themselves say. A criminal with or without a gun has little chance of evading the law if there's a lot of police manpower & good surveillance.
The UK govt. has (or had) a slogan, "tough on crime; tough on the causes of crime" & I reckon that's a sound approach - to tackle both simultaneously.
Hence the value of excellent schools in forming upstanding citizens who don't do drugs etc.!
TheReliquary 3 years ago
I agree!! You said yourself that Sweden has low prison rates. Must be the education that the children get. (smile)
mamangel39 3 years ago 7
the uk police does not need guns our citizens don't carry guns all they need is a taser gun to take a criminal down ALIVE,but if some criminals had guns then we do have armed police to deal with them.if the police haven't got a gun then they wont be able to shot anyone for a small offence like the Americans do
bouncyboy2 3 years ago 4
I agree with bouncyboy2 - armed police are best as a last resort.
Swedish police routinely carry guns and it makes them seem arrogant, unapproachable, threatening. Despite their guns, they're less effective than the British police.
The average British PC is easy to talk to and shows some respect for the people he/she serves. Hek, when they pulled me over for speeding, they still called me "sir" whilst giving me a good old bollocking!
Policing by consent!
TheReliquary 3 years ago
While I agree that there are situations where a tazer gun would be preferable to a normal handgun, Police tend not to regard tazers as a weapon and handle these weapons more frivolously. Swedish Police were granted pepperspray a few years ago, I believe, and have used these nearly on whim where the situation was not threatening but where the person would not comply or obey. I know that this is also the case with tazers in the U.S of A and, I'm sure, in other places such as Britain.
Slimsoj 2 years ago 7
Police should therefor refrain from violence and rather use alternative methods and would more readily do so were they only issued a handgun. The right training is paramount, of course.
Slimsoj 2 years ago 7
It's great how they let the kids be outside so much. If I have kids, I want them to go to a school like this.
ReadThisIfYourStupid 4 years ago 24
A really good approach to educating young children.
isabella2215 4 years ago 17
Wow, I wish I had that kind of opportunity...
unstuckjdt 4 years ago 17
I want to move to Sweden.
randolphtd1 4 years ago 25
@randolphtd1 LOOOL, and when u get there u will be wanting to move away from sweden.
yasashii89 1 year ago