Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
why has nobody brought up the the occassion on june the 8th 1483, when the evidence of a bishop was brought forward that edward iv had already been married when he married elizabeth woodville and so the children were illegitimate.
secretpigeon 7 months ago
@secretpigeon I believe that it is given later in evidence.
valentinejay 7 months ago
my gosh.. she was so oooo much a lady.. the dr. that witnessed.. so nice to see that we dont see it much at all any more.
kingslegion1 11 months ago
If the bones could be proved by DNA to indeed be those of the boys,it still dont prove the guilt of Richard-or anyone else.The bones are a red herring....
MyEpp 2 years ago 2
well, they are not a red Herring; afterall, the princes would of course have been found, and it would confirm that they indeed died c.1483-1484.
that said, I do agree that that the discovery-on its own-doesn't prove Richard III's guilt.
Albukhshi 2 years ago 3