I wonder if Richard gets by calling his wife an "object." How does cosmic "inevitability" produce the self replicating cell? Non-artificial intelligence? Are we still seeing new cells spring up out of the ether?
@Wyldwulf Life (new cells) spring out of the result of a chemical reaction, wich often requires surrounding energy. This is an observable fact. So basically, life or a living entity is an energy consuming and "storage" of nutrients. There is nothing holy about this, when we die we become fertiliser for plants (new "energy") and the cycle of life goes on. I'm quite happy about this, in a sence that is living for an eternity (but in another form). So, in the future, my body WILL save lives. =)
The ancestry and parentage of species results in an intelligent design FACT this is so complicated beyond the notions of the outdated scientific philosophy of a 150 years ago to them the cell was just a blob and all the theories of the cosmos and species have been turned upside down with modern scientific fact, philosophies such as the Big Bang and Micro Evolution really never happened we have far better telescopes and computer technology we can actually look to th
Until you can present actual evidence rather than simply appealing to beauty and wonder (which proves nothing, you don't need god to appreciate beauty and wonder), and until you work out your own inconsistencies (you argue that Big Bang theory / evolution are "outdated" yet quote the Bible which is thousands of years older), I will continue to examine scientifically evaluated evidence and reach much the same conclusions as every other freethinker. My simple challenge to you is: prove it!
Thanks for your advice it would be great also for you to look at the facts rather than outdated theories As in Current Yes i agree with you the current facts are the earth is round and Yes we didnt evolve from aps not a single transitional fossil LOL so you keep believing in the flat earth and evolution
Again another one of your stoned out theories No Fossil is a transitional Fossil Fossils are a captured event frozen in time if they were transitional we would clearly see over time evolution from cows to dolphins but this is not the case is it now recently I went to the Aquarium in Melbourne they had a shark tank they said that these sharks evolved from those sharks LOL well what are the older species still in the Tank even the Scientist there said that its only a theory if you believe in tha
Oh my god, you are very naive, also the appearance of "lol", in each comment just makes you look like a moron. I don't blame Falloutmoon for not arguing back beyond this point, because you have already proved how foolish you are. But firstly, YES, all fossils are transitional, but if you don't believe me why not go ask your none identical mother, sister, or even great great grandmother. Since that's what you imply by saying there not. "cows to dolphins"?, your an idiot. Stupid girl.
"All fossils are transitional" propaganda and spin you are looking like the Moron The Greeks handed us the method of science and logic but however they dont teach logic or common sense at uni do they? we must stress the difference between Religion, Philosophy and Science these realy shouldnt mix Evolution falls under Religion or Philosophy Not Science because one must have faith to believe in that it is a theory and a very undated one to i might add
You know that without basic punctuation its very hard to understand what your saying, that's why we have it. How exactly is it propaganda? That doesn't make sense, If all being where not transitional then we would all the same, in fact, its impossible to pass on DNA without being transitional. Unless you as a Christian are suggesting we are A-cell organisms.
Uni? This has nothing to do with university or age. But as far as common sense and logic goes, religion is oblivious to it. Religion is choosing faith above logic, the two do not cross.
And finally, your confusing the meaning of the word theory (which is a common error.) In the scientific community there are laws and theory's, a theory will never be a law no matter true it is. So if you will, think of it as it having been the 'the theory of the theory of evolution' instead. It is in fact no longer a "theory" in the meaning to which you refer it. It is scientific fact, it is only a theory because it is not a law, if you can understand that.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
your just unreasonable a talescopes designd but yet a snake isnt? did you know just one cell in that snake has more comples design in it than all those designed objects on the table this proves a comon designer yes your right billions times more complucated
catholichotie - If spelling "comon" (common?) words like "comples" (complex?) is too "complucated" (complicated?) for you, perhaps it would be wise to leave science to the scientists.
I am Greek and my English isnt so Great but at least I am trying to give it a go. Βλέπετε μή τις ὑμᾶς ἔσται ὁ συλαγωγῶν διὰ τῆς φιλοσοφίας καὶ κενῆς ἀπάτης, κατὰ τὴν παράδοσιν τῶν ἀνθρώπων, κατὰ τὰ στοιχεῖα τοῦ κόσμου καὶ οὐ κατὰ Χριστόν·
You clearly didn't fully understand (or listen to) this video. The appearance of the snake is that of a designed object, but it isn't. Dawkins explains perfectly how the appearance of design results completely from natural selection. The result is, of course, something that is billions of times more complicated that the microscope but NOT designed by a higher creator.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Agreed--his zeal for biology and the passing on of his knowledge to future generations is almost unparalleled (his intelligence in the subject as well). I can definitely picture him as one of the best high school/college bio teachers in the world, but his kind, professorly voice has now been replaced with shrill, antireligious noise.
I believe that the crusade against religion is a manifestation of frustration over recent phenomenons that have attacked the beautifull science of his choice.
In "The greatest show on Earth Pros. Dawkins says he is afraid of snakes :) haha poor Dawkins :)
Cubenews 2 months ago
I wonder if Richard gets by calling his wife an "object." How does cosmic "inevitability" produce the self replicating cell? Non-artificial intelligence? Are we still seeing new cells spring up out of the ether?
Wyldwulf 1 year ago
@Wyldwulf do you actually believe in ether as well?
spazoid82 1 year ago
@Wyldwulf Life (new cells) spring out of the result of a chemical reaction, wich often requires surrounding energy. This is an observable fact. So basically, life or a living entity is an energy consuming and "storage" of nutrients. There is nothing holy about this, when we die we become fertiliser for plants (new "energy") and the cycle of life goes on. I'm quite happy about this, in a sence that is living for an eternity (but in another form). So, in the future, my body WILL save lives. =)
Basram 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"The God Debate" is on my channel.
atheistfriends 2 years ago
great vid!
for more knowledge, go here:
truthknowledge. Com
MopDMTBARTL 2 years ago
Greetings Friend
The ancestry and parentage of species results in an intelligent design FACT this is so complicated beyond the notions of the outdated scientific philosophy of a 150 years ago to them the cell was just a blob and all the theories of the cosmos and species have been turned upside down with modern scientific fact, philosophies such as the Big Bang and Micro Evolution really never happened we have far better telescopes and computer technology we can actually look to th
catholichotie 2 years ago
Friend,
Until you can present actual evidence rather than simply appealing to beauty and wonder (which proves nothing, you don't need god to appreciate beauty and wonder), and until you work out your own inconsistencies (you argue that Big Bang theory / evolution are "outdated" yet quote the Bible which is thousands of years older), I will continue to examine scientifically evaluated evidence and reach much the same conclusions as every other freethinker. My simple challenge to you is: prove it!
kcy29581 2 years ago
Greetings Catholichotie
please get a proper ( as in current) education...
Falloutmoon 2 years ago 2
Thanks for your advice it would be great also for you to look at the facts rather than outdated theories As in Current Yes i agree with you the current facts are the earth is round and Yes we didnt evolve from aps not a single transitional fossil LOL so you keep believing in the flat earth and evolution
catholichotie 2 years ago
You don't seem to be aware that we're in the 21th century and not the middle ages...
ps: every fossil is a transitional fossil... goes a long way to show how ignorant you actually are on this topic...
Falloutmoon 2 years ago
Again another one of your stoned out theories No Fossil is a transitional Fossil Fossils are a captured event frozen in time if they were transitional we would clearly see over time evolution from cows to dolphins but this is not the case is it now recently I went to the Aquarium in Melbourne they had a shark tank they said that these sharks evolved from those sharks LOL well what are the older species still in the Tank even the Scientist there said that its only a theory if you believe in tha
catholichotie 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Damn you're stupid...
Falloutmoon 2 years ago
Oh my god, you are very naive, also the appearance of "lol", in each comment just makes you look like a moron. I don't blame Falloutmoon for not arguing back beyond this point, because you have already proved how foolish you are. But firstly, YES, all fossils are transitional, but if you don't believe me why not go ask your none identical mother, sister, or even great great grandmother. Since that's what you imply by saying there not. "cows to dolphins"?, your an idiot. Stupid girl.
gracore 2 years ago
"All fossils are transitional" propaganda and spin you are looking like the Moron The Greeks handed us the method of science and logic but however they dont teach logic or common sense at uni do they? we must stress the difference between Religion, Philosophy and Science these realy shouldnt mix Evolution falls under Religion or Philosophy Not Science because one must have faith to believe in that it is a theory and a very undated one to i might add
catholichotie 2 years ago
You know that without basic punctuation its very hard to understand what your saying, that's why we have it. How exactly is it propaganda? That doesn't make sense, If all being where not transitional then we would all the same, in fact, its impossible to pass on DNA without being transitional. Unless you as a Christian are suggesting we are A-cell organisms.
gracore 2 years ago
Uni? This has nothing to do with university or age. But as far as common sense and logic goes, religion is oblivious to it. Religion is choosing faith above logic, the two do not cross.
gracore 2 years ago
And finally, your confusing the meaning of the word theory (which is a common error.) In the scientific community there are laws and theory's, a theory will never be a law no matter true it is. So if you will, think of it as it having been the 'the theory of the theory of evolution' instead. It is in fact no longer a "theory" in the meaning to which you refer it. It is scientific fact, it is only a theory because it is not a law, if you can understand that.
gracore 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
your just unreasonable a talescopes designd but yet a snake isnt? did you know just one cell in that snake has more comples design in it than all those designed objects on the table this proves a comon designer yes your right billions times more complucated
catholichotie 3 years ago
I suggest you search, "Ken Miller on Bacterial Flagellum"
nethius 3 years ago
yes i'll do that
catholichotie 3 years ago
does the catholic church teach spelling along with bogus BS?
AshNekoBoy 2 years ago 3
catholichotie - If spelling "comon" (common?) words like "comples" (complex?) is too "complucated" (complicated?) for you, perhaps it would be wise to leave science to the scientists.
untamedgorilla 2 years ago 3
I am Greek and my English isnt so Great but at least I am trying to give it a go. Βλέπετε μή τις ὑμᾶς ἔσται ὁ συλαγωγῶν διὰ τῆς φιλοσοφίας καὶ κενῆς ἀπάτης, κατὰ τὴν παράδοσιν τῶν ἀνθρώπων, κατὰ τὰ στοιχεῖα τοῦ κόσμου καὶ οὐ κατὰ Χριστόν·
catholichotie 2 years ago
Sorry. Your English is much better than my Greek!
(I still think you have much to learn about science however...)
untamedgorilla 2 years ago 2
You clearly didn't fully understand (or listen to) this video. The appearance of the snake is that of a designed object, but it isn't. Dawkins explains perfectly how the appearance of design results completely from natural selection. The result is, of course, something that is billions of times more complicated that the microscope but NOT designed by a higher creator.
kcy29581 2 years ago
@catholichotie I suggest you learn to write correctly.
NNGTV 4 days ago
maximusmcc please finish middle school and learn what a fictional and non fictional book is then please post a response.
darkedge21 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Just another stupid atheist trying to convice himself there is no god. LOL What a MAROOOOON!
MaximusMcc 4 years ago
I'm sure he's fine with his beliefs. A personal God, while not disprovable, really does need the reading of tea leaves.
modemmack 3 years ago 2
lol yet another theist who has to call people names in capitals to try to convince themselves that there is a god.
Subfavscream 3 years ago 6
What's a MAROOOOON?
grdeyt 3 years ago 3
hahahahahhahahahahhaa, look who is talking:)
ryanmelody 3 years ago
how exactly..
nekken87 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The rocks look designed to me. What a maroon!
MaximusMcc 4 years ago
are you talking about the rock in the sculpture or the rocks in the "simple" group?
driftingsmoke 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Good to see Dawkins before he went on his crusade against religion ;)
alliswel 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Agreed--his zeal for biology and the passing on of his knowledge to future generations is almost unparalleled (his intelligence in the subject as well). I can definitely picture him as one of the best high school/college bio teachers in the world, but his kind, professorly voice has now been replaced with shrill, antireligious noise.
kwarhol07 4 years ago
I believe that the crusade against religion is a manifestation of frustration over recent phenomenons that have attacked the beautifull science of his choice.
rouey 4 years ago 4
Absolutely. When superstition attacks reason it annoys people of reason ^^
megamarsvin 3 years ago 2
I agree! forget the politcs and stick to the science!
ndjarnag 4 years ago 2
lol, i feel sorry for the kid, hes got an anaconda going around his neck and hearing about how goo they are at strangling:P
Erech01 4 years ago
It occurred to me that the microscope is as "simple" as the other objects - a product of a natural process, of which Dawkins is a part.
clray123 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
How are the rocks not designed?
MaximusMcc 4 years ago
Not designed as in not planned up-front by someone to serve a particular purpose.
clray123 4 years ago 3
awesome
terrasidius 4 years ago
what a treat. Thankyou kind sir.
ldl21 4 years ago 3
thank you!!!!
nadiaTeeze 4 years ago 3
Brilliant lecture by a slightly nerdy Dawkins. Thanks for that series!
Jeremias1111 4 years ago 7
dont make fun of us nerdy people!:P
Erech01 4 years ago 2
Pure awesome.
Sehr sehr gut.
RevKentHovind 4 years ago 4