Added: 4 years ago
From: nethius
Views: 5,738
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (49)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • In "The greatest show on Earth Pros. Dawkins says he is afraid of snakes :) haha poor Dawkins :)

  • I wonder if Richard gets by calling his wife an "object." How does cosmic "inevitability" produce the self replicating cell? Non-artificial intelligence? Are we still seeing new cells spring up out of the ether?

  • @Wyldwulf do you actually believe in ether as well?

  • @Wyldwulf Life (new cells) spring out of the result of a chemical reaction, wich often requires surrounding energy. This is an observable fact. So basically, life or a living entity is an energy consuming and "storage" of nutrients. There is nothing holy about this, when we die we become fertiliser for plants (new "energy") and the cycle of life goes on. I'm quite happy about this, in a sence that is living for an eternity (but in another form). So, in the future, my body WILL save lives. =)

  • great vid!

    for more knowledge, go here:

    truthknowledge. Com

  • Greetings Friend

    The ancestry and parentage of species results in an intelligent design FACT this is so complicated beyond the notions of the outdated scientific philosophy of a 150 years ago to them the cell was just a blob and all the theories of the cosmos and species have been turned upside down with modern scientific fact, philosophies such as the Big Bang and Micro Evolution really never happened we have far better telescopes and computer technology we can actually look to th

  • Friend,

    Until you can present actual evidence rather than simply appealing to beauty and wonder (which proves nothing, you don't need god to appreciate beauty and wonder), and until you work out your own inconsistencies (you argue that Big Bang theory / evolution are "outdated" yet quote the Bible which is thousands of years older), I will continue to examine scientifically evaluated evidence and reach much the same conclusions as every other freethinker. My simple challenge to you is: prove it!

  • Greetings Catholichotie

    please get a proper ( as in current) education...

  • Thanks for your advice it would be great also for you to look at the facts rather than outdated theories As in Current Yes i agree with you the current facts are the earth is round and Yes we didnt evolve from aps not a single transitional fossil LOL so you keep believing in the flat earth and evolution

  • You don't seem to be aware that we're in the 21th century and not the middle ages...

    ps: every fossil is a transitional fossil... goes a long way to show how ignorant you actually are on this topic...

  • Again another one of your stoned out theories No Fossil is a transitional Fossil Fossils are a captured event frozen in time if they were transitional we would clearly see over time evolution from cows to dolphins but this is not the case is it now recently I went to the Aquarium in Melbourne they had a shark tank they said that these sharks evolved from those sharks LOL well what are the older species still in the Tank even the Scientist there said that its only a theory if you believe in tha

  • Oh my god, you are very naive, also the appearance of "lol", in each comment just makes you look like a moron. I don't blame Falloutmoon for not arguing back beyond this point, because you have already proved how foolish you are. But firstly, YES, all fossils are transitional, but if you don't believe me why not go ask your none identical mother, sister, or even great great grandmother. Since that's what you imply by saying there not. "cows to dolphins"?, your an idiot. Stupid girl.

  • "All fossils are transitional" propaganda and spin you are looking like the Moron The Greeks handed us the method of science and logic but however they dont teach logic or common sense at uni do they? we must stress the difference between Religion, Philosophy and Science these realy shouldnt mix Evolution falls under Religion or Philosophy Not Science because one must have faith to believe in that it is a theory and a very undated one to i might add

  • You know that without basic punctuation its very hard to understand what your saying, that's why we have it. How exactly is it propaganda? That doesn't make sense, If all being where not transitional then we would all the same, in fact, its impossible to pass on DNA without being transitional. Unless you as a Christian are suggesting we are A-cell organisms.

  • Uni? This has nothing to do with university or age. But as far as common sense and logic goes, religion is oblivious to it. Religion is choosing faith above logic, the two do not cross.

  • And finally, your confusing the meaning of the word theory (which is a common error.) In the scientific community there are laws and theory's, a theory will never be a law no matter true it is. So if you will, think of it as it having been the 'the theory of the theory of evolution' instead. It is in fact no longer a "theory" in the meaning to which you refer it. It is scientific fact, it is only a theory because it is not a law, if you can understand that.

  • I suggest you search, "Ken Miller on Bacterial Flagellum"

  • yes i'll do that

  • does the catholic church teach spelling along with bogus BS?

  • catholichotie - If spelling "comon" (common?) words like "comples" (complex?) is too "complucated" (complicated?) for you, perhaps it would be wise to leave science to the scientists.

  • I am Greek and my English isnt so Great but at least I am trying to give it a go. Βλέπετε μή τις ὑμᾶς ἔσται ὁ συλαγωγῶν διὰ τῆς φιλοσοφίας καὶ κενῆς ἀπάτης, κατὰ τὴν παράδοσιν τῶν ἀνθρώπων, κατὰ τὰ στοιχεῖα τοῦ κόσμου καὶ οὐ κατὰ Χριστόν·

  • Sorry. Your English is much better than my Greek!

    (I still think you have much to learn about science however...)

  • You clearly didn't fully understand (or listen to) this video. The appearance of the snake is that of a designed object, but it isn't. Dawkins explains perfectly how the appearance of design results completely from natural selection. The result is, of course, something that is billions of times more complicated that the microscope but NOT designed by a higher creator.

  • @catholichotie I suggest you learn to write correctly.

  • maximusmcc please finish middle school and learn what a fictional and non fictional book is then please post a response.

  • I'm sure he's fine with his beliefs. A personal God, while not disprovable, really does need the reading of tea leaves.

  • lol yet another theist who has to call people names in capitals to try to convince themselves that there is a god.

  • What's a MAROOOOON?

  • hahahahahhahahahahhaa, look who is talking:)

  • how exactly..

  • are you talking about the rock in the sculpture or the rocks in the "simple" group?

  • I believe that the crusade against religion is a manifestation of frustration over recent phenomenons that have attacked the beautifull science of his choice.

  • Absolutely. When superstition attacks reason it annoys people of reason ^^

  • I agree! forget the politcs and stick to the science!

  • lol, i feel sorry for the kid, hes got an anaconda going around his neck and hearing about how goo they are at strangling:P

  • It occurred to me that the microscope is as "simple" as the other objects - a product of a natural process, of which Dawkins is a part.

  • Not designed as in not planned up-front by someone to serve a particular purpose.

  • awesome

  • what a treat. Thankyou kind sir.

  • thank you!!!!

  • Brilliant lecture by a slightly nerdy Dawkins. Thanks for that series!

  • dont make fun of us nerdy people!:P

  • Pure awesome.

    Sehr sehr gut.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more