Bradford Uni Law Soc Presents; HOW TO MOOT

[nastyphoenix]

This should be renamed 'Bradford Uni Law Soc Presents; How NOT to moot'. You can't even dress properly. Seriously, a white tie and black shirt? You look more like a magician! And you're 'learned' friend sounds like a robot!

[Crebralassassin]

I thought it was great! Thanks for the video!

[DesertFox111]

You never say "my ladyshit" It is "my lady" unless you are addressing an all female bench and then you say "your ladyships.

[rory1232009]

Yeah that second guy sounds like the voice machine Steven Hawkings uses

[rosorus]

No white ties in Court please chaps!!

[bazza01786]

what's with the accents

[fnarain]

Actually the first speaker is supposed to introduce ALL parties...and it's fine to say your full name....if u don't know anything, then don't comment!

[tryingsomethingne]

Good job friends!

[icedbannanas]

sheesh... people are so damn critical!!!

[SuperAbz11]

I have got 2 submission for you, 1st submission: the first fella is a domestic spanner 2nd submission: Domestic spanner needs to practice mooting without being so dependent on reading every word by word on a piece of paper and improvise professionally coherent to the moot submission.

End OF Moot

[UnleashTheVoice]

really bad mooting... not just the talking but the presentation of the speech and the speech itself....

they're not supposed to say their name.. its suppposed to be... my name is Robinson Initial M.... not your full name

and

you don't tell the judge who your opposition is.. that's their own business.. and its learned colleague...

[XTINAsianlatinA]

@UnleashTheVoice That not always the case, in our instructions it says the appellants are supposed to introduce all 4 members of counsel...however just dont know why respondants are going first? Moots are supposed to be appeal cases...

[SuperAbz11]

Load of shite MY LADY

[neverthisinsane09]

learn to speak proper english first. it was helpful in a way, but his words were very blurry.

[CuteEls]

crappy pappy

[The360skiier]

crap



[Catalyst2]

Stop grinning!

[bradfordunilawsoc]

Nothing wrong with reading from your papers every now and again, they certainly do in Court.

The purpose of this film is to contrast with the 'How not to moot' film in this series, and to show the basic structure - sorry if you find it boring or 'robotic', but this film is a highly edited version of a full moot, just to show how to put submissions etc.

Hope it's been some help anyway.

[botladola]

I LOVE MOOT!

[TheVin999]

It's totally robotic reading, not mooting! The mooter should be speaking to the judge; not at the judge.

[isellchocolate]

Rather poor mooting skills!

[gondolaz]

There is too much of reading from the paper. Other than that quite nicely done...

[NaRtaYMaRn]

loving the swagger o the first speaker!!! nice one GEEEEE