Added: 3 years ago
From: WorksUK
Views: 38,649
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (168)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Every single Asian should have to be as badass as Genghis Khan

  • turk altay : kazakstan uzbekistan azeribejan turkmenistan kirgizstan turkistan tatarstan tuvan japan korean : turk HUN ALTAY EMPIRE

  • " Huns and barbarians destroyed the roman empire ..." actually neither huns destroyed romans neither romans huns.at battle on catalaun fields (451)romans destroyed huns.but they did not destroyed huns empire.and roman empire was effectivelly destroyed by barbarians(476), but they were germanic, not hunnic at all.besides if you want to claim attilas legacy for yourself you have a loooong discusion with turkic people who think that attila was turkic.(we in europe know he was of asian race though)

  • Secondly, the Egyptians pretty much wrecked the Mongols and dealt them a blow that they never recovered from.

  • @dagon11985

    It was actually Turkic Mamluk cavalry in Egypt, so it wasn't native Egyptians themselves but mostly Turkic Mamluk cavalry.

  • @A2Kaid No , there were 40000 troops divided into 6000 of Mamluk Turks & rest were Egyptian Soldiers , The Mamluks were minority although they ruled Egypt that's because there origins were from Asia Minor & they kept their blood sort of pure from being mixed with the native Egyptian who were under their rule , so speaking of a 40000 Mamluk Cavalry is unbelievably big number , it's totally irrational.

  • The British Empire would have annihilated Genghis', but that is not a fair comparison. Any modern military would annihilate the Mongols - Guns > Swords, Bows, and Arrows. Secondly, the Roman and Macedonian Empires would have faired pretty well against the Mongols - in large part because they confronted and defeated people who used the same tactics as the Mongols, and did so more than once. The Mongols rose to power when other empires (such as the Chinese, Roman, ect) were gone or weakened.

  • @dagon11985

    finally a person with some sense....

  • Comment removed

  • No one uses genghis tactics so he fails...epicly.

  • Mongols rode on ponies, not horses.Did anyone seen what a pony is?That thing is a kid's toy.Ponies were very maneuvarable but much slower than any horse.There is no way mongols can use the arabic horse-back-archery tactic on knights.lol.Mongols also relied on fields not forests.There is no way mongols could have win.In fact, genghis khan died of grief after finding out he won't be able to take europe.lol.Im just tired of hearing pride in uselessness.

  • Just so you know, mongols controlled unpopulated land.no duh.If I set up borders on land where no one lives, is that an empire?lol.That's exactly what mongols did.East russian was EMPTY.It took no effort to take it.All they did was ride in and establish bases.Period, no fighting.When the fighting began, they lost.Russians ALONE riuned mongols.Imagine if all of europe fought.Seriously, mongols would just crawl back into the hole's they crawled out from.

  • @IRussian007

    pretty much true, they didn't really create an empire aside from the one in China; the rest of their rule was mainly extortion of money from client rulers.

    If they ever reached central and western Europe they would have faced the same demise as the Huns did 1000 years before, unusable terrain for their cavalry, wet climate for their bows and a coalition of forces united against them. Still at the time they were quite strategically mobile...

  • @ilejovcevski79

    you forgot important things of western europe: heavely armoured infantry and cavalry capable of matchng the mongols

  • @CasperDalboe

    heavy troops might not have been a good response to Mongol strategic skirmishing; just look at the late crusades (against the Turks), because of poor mobility and lack of discipline, the superior (in armor and weapons) western armies were constantly defeated by more light Turkish troops.

  • Comment removed

  • @ilejovcevski79

    they defeated the turks several devastating times...the reason the crusades were lost for the europeans were theyre violent genocides, which turned the people of middle east against them.....caravans and other cicil peole attacked the europeans because of the barbaricness......

  • @CasperDalboe

    well granted, but what i had in mind were the late crusades, against the otomans from 14th century onwards

  • @ilejovcevski79

    i bet that had the heavy infantry held their lines and followed their orders, they would have crushed them, just like the romens did with cavalry-people in their time....

  • @CasperDalboe Agreed, discipline, superior training, equipment and tactics would always win, in war more then in any other province it's quality beats quantity :)

  • @IRussian007 that is HILARIOUS.

    is this what they teach you in russia as "history".

    Go look up the Battle of Legnica you retard.

    Genghis died from a fall off his horse.

    Russia "ruined" mongols lol, more like Russians got raped by Mongols at that time. Go look up the Golden Horde.

    Genghis Khan is the greatest military leader in recorded human history, put that in your pipe and smoke it.

  • @pspawnslayer I know how genghis died, I was joking about him dying of grief....*sigh*.I looked up everything you did bt I saw what you didn't.I researched related and surrounding topics like medieval warfare,chronicling, and stuff, I can figure a more realistic image of what mongol conquest was like unlike you...and smoking is bad mmkay?lol

    Of what I know of strategy and warfare,napoleon and the romans were the best strategists.Their tactics are used in modern military till this day.

  • @pspawnslayer russia did ruin the mongol empire i not the enthc peoples.It's true that mongols raped russian women but hey, russian warriors raped mongol warriors so put that in you pipe and smoke it, will ya.Mongols preyed on the women.....how barbaric and cheap.lol.Mongols fail.

  • @pspawnslayer I forgot to add a little history lesson for you.The franks ruined the moors using a simple tactic that the romans commonly used.Based on this, we can clearly see jus how the mongols would be ruined at the hands of romans.So don't get all proud of barbarism.It's cheap and weak against organized opposition.Good day to you.

  • @pspawnslayer

    I wouldn't label Genghis the greatest military leader ever; on of the greatest sure, but you have to take into account who and what the Mongols fought against. Yes they created a great empire, but 1/2 to 3/4 of that empire was unpopulated or sparsely populated steppe. And aside from China (which was in turmoil too) they didn't really fight that many organized opposition.

  • on the other hand look at Caesar(Julius), he didn't really expand Rome all that much, but in the civil war he fought legions with training, equipment and military readiness as good as his own troops, he was often outnumbered and most important of all, his chief enemy was a general every bit as competent as himself (Pompey the Great).

  • Mongols failed to capture Egypt.

  • I watched this movie in high def with my brother, truly spectacular. Very warlord-ish, empire, father and family, father of nation - so many nuances, themes. khan Timudgin and his love for Borte

  • Dai Viet, presently known as Vietnam was the only nation that was able to fend off the Mongols. 3 times in a row also! Google it, Mongol Invasion of Vietnam!

  • @sayacookies Very interesting. Vietnam just fends off everyone throughout history don't they? lol I never knew this bit about the Mongolians too though, thank you for that bit of information.

  • by the way, what is wrong with this trailer? why it shows the character 愛 in a mongol historical movie﹖WTF﹖ignorant westeners?

  • It was amazing that Genghis Khan had an army of no more than 120,000 when he used it to conquer the world. Nontheless his army was at the state of the art, way better than any of his opponents. He was also a great & brave strategist to lead them too.

  • the Egyptians killed him

  • He's just another ancient Adolf Hitler of China

  • @wuyunchi he was mongolian not chinese dude and not king of china .HE was king of mongolia and the biggest empire of the world ever

  • @mondoisme I didn't say he was Chinese. I said this movie is in setted and the language is in China and Mongolia! Mostly people were speaking Mongolian. But they also spoke few Madrian.

  • @mondoisme At the time, China doesn't exist. Instead there were Jin, South Song, Tibet, East Tarkstan and parts of Mongolian which helped formed today's China. "China" doesn't really exist till Ming dynasty. There weren't even a world for "China" rather mainly have Centraline (Mostly Northern China)+ other barbarins around Centraline(Southern China+Northern Asians). The history channel or what so ever wanted to keep it simple just call Song as Southern China and Jin as Northern China.

  • @mondoisme Chinese is proude of their civilization but acttually they people that can be called "Real Chinese" are only the people in South of Northern China. Southern Chinese (For example Hong Kong and Canton) are rather more simular to Southern East Asians, Northern East Chinese are mix between Chinese, Manchurians and Mongolians. People in Beijing and Hebei province are mix between Chinese and bit of Mongolians. Almost all Chinese are mixed with countries beside them. Expect few!

  • @wuyunchi you fucking dumb ass, if you dotn knwo jack shit about DNA then keep yoru mouth shut

    cantonese to some extend did have some admixture with the southern native  in southern china , but their fatherline still remain dominating Han

    you fuking cock sucker, stop spreadign liea around you fuking cock sucker

    always lie with a straihgt face

    as for northen han, they stil remain purely, as for intermixign between han and nomads were been banned

  • @pandaboy1993hk There were recent document finding support that 潮州人 (I said Cantonese because I didn't want to make it complicated) are actually similar to South East Asians. Only 广州人are similar to people from Centraline. During Qin Dynasty. These was a country called 南越国 and it's today's Canton and Guangxi.

  • @wuyunchi no, according to YDNA, teochow,hakka,cantonese, all of them have similar YDNA(fatherline) it is just their motherline had some considerable admixing with the southern native

    teochow, hakka, also came down from the centeral or north, but they were just later comers than cantonese

    DNA proven so, so you cant really aruge

  • @wuyunchi you know what dumbass, i sugges you to keep your ignoran tmouth shut, so far, the shit you stated, none of them are hold any scientifc basis , its mostly based on your instict

    try and read up some scientific papers instead of gussing, you fuk face

    serioulsy, if you dont have any idea about the topic, just keep quiet and stop trying to give out lesson on it. stop pretending to know when infact you not sure and no evidence

    fuckin shame of china, you are dirtorting things about china

  • you are fuking wrong fuk face, infact, beijing, is one of the noerthen branch that is least pure han. because majority of beijing population was immigrated from the south

    none of any northen chinese had too much genetic impact from nomads, as i stated before, because of the banning between han and nomads during yuan and qing. got that you dumbass?

  • @pandaboy1993hk 1 out of 13 people in the world got Mongol blood. Because they are mostly Northern Chinese. If you read support documents they will all state this fact!

  • @pandaboy1993hk People in Beijing were raped by Mongol's army! Okay. This movie is a load of shit. Gingers Khan was just another Adolf Hitler. Beijing was butchered by his army!

  • @wuyunchi , if you read up some DNA papers, , northen chinese, not only that they got no mongol blood, but on the contrary, in mongol blood can be found at least 15% O3 genetimarker. which goes to prove, the mongols got fuked instead.

    they got their ass swollen up instead , as china had such a big population

    again, this is based on sciense not like you, whos only using assumtion

  • @wuyunchi you cock sucker, most of chinese in north east china were only recently immigrated, as it was banned by manchu to cross to there,

    most of them were immigrated from south china and shandong

    han in north east china  consisted of many different province of chinese

    and if you know the history behind " wu" you would know your family background also have some serious interaction with the yue AKA south east asian

  • @pandaboy1993hk Yo, you dum fuck. Read more history. Beijing was the capital of Yuan Dynasty. It was raped by the Mongols. You didn't read shit about China you dum fuck. I bet you can't even type Chinese. HAHA. I read many scientific papers over Han blood. There isn't any per blooded Han. The closet are people from Shanxi and Xhanxi province. You dum fuck. Because they are in Central China. It wasn't close to any of these barbarians. Use you brain. Beijing is close to Mongol boarder.Serch online

  • @pandaboy1993hk Southern Chinese are immigrated from Centraline (中原). It's today Shanxi province. Only people from Norther East China are mix between Shangdongese and Manchurians.

  • @wuyunchi no you idiot, besdies shandong han, theres also a lot from jiangsu, and other southern chinese provines immigrated to north east china

    and the history of han immigrating to north east china wasnt very long

    as far as i know, the purest han can be found in china now is those han from hebei

  • @pandaboy1993hk You dum fuck, the Qing dynasty was ruled by the Machruains. Hans were sub-Manchurians. I didn't meant Northern China was mix with Manchurians. I only meant North East Chinese. North East Chinese are mix between Shangdongese during 闯关东 and Manchurians.

  • @pandaboy1993hk Look for 纯汉人! Dum fuck!

  • @mondoisme

    no he wasnt...he was king of the largest COHERENT empire in the world. The British Empire had a much greater landmass than the mongolian empire, but it was a world-spanning empire

  • @wuyunchi 你不要再四處處妖言畫眾 如果不懂某些東西的話

  • lol @ the chinese words ...they are totally diff languages.

  • he probably could rape alexanders and the roman empire easily

  • @Edd692

    he would rape alexander and the roman empire... Genghis Khan's empire was like 5 times bigger than the roman empire... he reigned like 3/4 of asia...

  • @petervsays

    rome and macedonia relied heavily on quality over quantity....the conquered and ruled great civilazations and a lot of great land and also large cities...mongolia required taxed over most of asia (steppe and desert) from client rulers, now is that a greater empire than rome or macedonia? i do not think so......

  • @CasperDalboe Genghis Khan wasnt about size, i laugh cause i just thought of a stereotype for asians, it was his strategic mind and technology that won him over the lands he conquered. He put fear into the faces he came across. Macedonia was an island, they kept to themselves and hire mercenaries, i dont think they'll go to war with Mongolia. Rome's downfall was within itself, they couldnt decide on a single ruler.

  • @petervsays

    genghis khan empire wasnt about size????? he ruled 2/3 of asia! with an empire that big, you cannot control it all from a distant capital, you have to do like all great empires have done: use the client ruler and tax the population trough the client rulers....khan had to do this to a greater extent than for example alexander or rome.....and i sligth question for you: when is it mercaenaries? all soldiers are being paid, but some belive in the course more than others....

  • @CasperDalboe when i mentioned "size" i meant his initial fighting power. Not his empire. Macedonia was an wealthy civilization considering that it was like the taxi of the ancient world. They didnt have much forces but since it was an island with very defensive power who would want to seize them? But when it came down to wars, Macedonia hired mercenaries(people who werent macedonian) to fight for them.

  • @petervsays

    i agree so far, that mercenaries are from other countries (though they believed in alexander and the course), but does it make the macedonian empire less great to your eyes? 

  • @CasperDalboe No, they are actually a great empire. They just didnt expand from beyond their island, which made good sense cause from their island it provided defense, made great wealth from "shipping" and had great art work (where i learned about the Macedonians). Nonetheless, Alexander from rome, cant say great cause it could offend people, was an exceptional leader.

  • @petervsays

    agreed

  • @petervsays

    Macedonia was an island?!!?!?

    like....and island that has no access to sea in its original borders :P

  • @Edd692 Well, Roman and alexander were 1000 years earlier. At the Time, China had the great empire of Han. Han had conquest against Northern Asian Barbarians and the Arabs. The Han Empire was actually equaling size to Roman Empire. Han conquest began early than Roman conquest. Roman Empire is just a European version of Han Empire!!!

  • @Edd692 maybe the roman empire but never alexanders

  • @Edd692

    tell me....how excactly would his cavalry smash trough alexanders falanxes or romes heavy, disciplined infantry?

    and even they could, genghis khan ruled about 1000 later......

  • Comment removed

  • @Edd692 easily i dont think so but he might win because of his horde of calvary

  • the first defeat of the mongols was by the mamelukes of eqypt about 20 years after genghis khan died

  • yes ,, first memluk-turks stopped ghangis army ( other turkic warriors ). after that ottoman turks stopped memluk turks .

    it mean just turk can be beaten by other turk :)

    memluks were slave turkic warriors of Arabs ! couse of that fuck all arabs ! ( prophet Muhammed s.a.v. wasnt arab , he was from sumerian origin ) .

  • this looks like a good film, is it in english or does it have subtitles?

  • @Joedrumz89 No, it's in Chinese and Mongol

  • genghis is japanese lol

  • @scully2222 No, he's Mongol, Japanese cant do shit because they are on an island!

  • These pathetic little chinese insects even pester youtube, they're everywhere. Idiotic, delusional cowards!

  • Very good movie. Very bloody, but that was how it was then. It shows that Genghis Khan actually did a lot to civilize the world... he ended torture, encouraged freedom of religion, and much more.

  • British empire was great and spread mainly because of their dominant navy. I don't think they would've defeated the Mongols at the time of Genghis. No other nation on earth could have at that time. people can keep trying to deny the truth but it won't do any good.

  • very very very right !!

  • @dhom100 Well, the civilized and most sophisticated Song empire (Capital Nanjing) cooperated with Mongol at the start fighting against their common enemy of Jin Empire (Capital Beijing), Song actually gave 300,000 advance troops to Gingers Khan. The Mongol learnt sophisticate technology like catapult, siege tower, gun powder weapons, cannons. Eventually Song and Mongol had wars against each other. The song lost and Mongol Set Beijing as their new capital!

  • @dhom100 hey u never heard about Huns ? Huns and barbarians destroyed the roman empire if u dont know that who is huns read about ATTILLA who was the king of huns or watch the night at the museum.The reason why i am talking about Huns is that Huns were mongolians thats it our grandpas kicked ur grandpas ass already hundred of years ago

  • @mondoisme yes I've heard of Huns and story of Atilla who grew up among Romans and became blah blah blah.

  • @dhom100 Russians did. The russians got them out of their land and anihilated them almost comletely. Even now if you go in the east of Russia you won't see any mongols but blue eyed people. Even today most of the immigrants coming to the eastern Russia, because of the fucking government regulation, fear blue eyes. Guess why :). Most of the slavs went in the east to get the mongols out of there and settled there. That's why Moscow is not ruled by true slavs and Russiaa is weak.Some people know it

  • @SomeUser9753 the mongols control all of russia for so long

    Poland, Kiev, Hungary, what else do you fuckin want fool

  • @ericssson Mongols are 0.

  • @ericssson Mongols are 0. This kgb propaganda

  • @SomeUser9753 sure it was ?? does it make you feel better wetbag

  • @ericssson The truth will set you free :).

  • @dhom100

    how about the first muslim armies under the command of muhammad?

  • @nbastar187187 pussy's compare to this man

  • @ericssson

    well if that's your answer you obviously don't know history very well.

  • @dhom100 british ??? they fought against 3 world country and on the sea

    never fought napoleon head on never fought spain head on they didn't do shit vs main land europe

    you can't compare the british vs Genghis Khan not in the same league

  • Comment removed

  • @ericssson

    wtf do you call waterloo, talavera, fontenoy, salamanca, albuero, vitoria, alma, balaclava, inkerman, sevastopol, quatre bras, barossa, busaco, and so on? thats on mainland europe the last time i checked.....

  • @dhom100 British also hired Hessians (Germans) however Genghis also used foreign troops. Ghenghis didn't conquer Western and Northern Europe or Northern Asia, Africa, Japan, etc. but did conquer a large section of Asia, Eastern Europe, and Russian. Kubla Khan tried to take Japan with a huge fleet but because of a storm much of his fleet was destroyed and the Japanese defeated the ones that arrived.

  • genghis khan made a hude empire very fast he was a brilliant leader.

  • They defeated a united force of Europeans in Poland and -although they didnt know it- there was no army of significance after that stopping them from reaching the Atlantic Ocean and even Great Britain. It was their ties of loyalty to their khan which halted them. Ogdai Khan died and they withdrew from Eastern Europe to select a new khan. Never to return, but they ruled much of Asia for 300 years after. Fools they really cuda ruled the whole of Eurasia.

  • U r right. It was sacred duty of Batu Han to return and give the last honor to Ugudei Khan.

    Also as a grandchild of Chinggis Khan, he was required to participate in Khural for choosing next Khan. So he had no other choise but to return back to steppes. But he also had general Subudai as his military supervisor (one of the finest generals of Chinggis Khan). So he could leave Subudai to continue the conquest and go back by himself. Instead Subudai also returned.

    I am Mongolian, by the way.

  • I've just finished reading a trilogy by Conn Iggulden about it. It's pretty good, I recommend it. It wet my appetite for learning more about the Mongol Empire.

    I guess they didn't really care about Europe did they? I mean, their native landscape was the Steppes. They attacked China because of their vendetta with them, but other then that their empire encompassed just the Steppes. The landscape of Poland and Hungary must have seemed very alien to them.

  • For Chinggis Khan it was his dream to unite the "world between two oceans", meaning from Atlantic Ocean to Pacific Ocean.

    But Batu Han, who was grandchild of Chinggis Khan, had different priorities, he wanted to establish his own empire. Because most of Asia was already conquered, the only way for him to create his empire was to start conquest in Europe. That was the beginning of "Altan Ord" ("Golden Horde", horde has origin from mongolian word "ord" by the way).

  • LOL. So true.

    but Kublai Khan went back and finished the job.  Genghiz Khan's grand son. He even broke the empire of southern China, a place that was never been conquered by his predecessors.

    Long Life Turkic-Mongol Race.

  • hey man, or Mad'm, we are fresh mind people. and we understand that yo tyelling us. Qe are Mongolians. Not tucik. se your face then tel your word to us. we rae different . Read more study more, or our lodd is more differnt. red cells in bliood are mongolians are more strong stucture tan other nations in result of sceintist. We are Mongoliand Under Etternal BLue Sky, We are Mongolians Long Live.

  • why do people get so insulting on here? The British Empire was the largest Empire ever. Fact. But the Mongol Empire was the largest single continuous empire in history, as The British Empire consisted of broken colonies scattered all over the world. The mongols defeated all the european armies they were up against mainly because of their mobility and skill when compared with the heavy armor of the euro cavalry and the untrained peasantry infantry

  • How was British Empire the largest ever, when I've see documentary about Mongol Empire made by British/BBC, stating Mongols were the biggest. Regardless of that documentary, British colony is very limited. They are scattered but there are few little countries which are very small in size around the world. Bring it on the table, name the countries. Mongol Empire was from the entire eastern seas to the much of Europe

  • but they conquer some part of europe...they say european army cant even compare to the strongest force of the mongols...........so you dont no shit dumbass...

  • "stgeorgereborn"....the largest empire way, way......bakk before the british rise was mongolia....and did you see history....they say the europeans were lucky mongolian leaders die and tats why the mongol didnt conquer all europe.

  • No mate the largest empire in history by a long, long, long way was the Great British Empire which ruled a quarter of the worlds population from its tiny island base. Anyway, looking forward to watching this and I heard its part of a trilogy. Largest land only empire and well done to the mongols for that. Anyone know the UK DVD date?

  • It weren't only the mongols who served for Genghis Khan, Turkic people also helped building up the empire. That's why it is mostly called the Turco-Mongol Empire. The name 'Cengiz Han' is a typical Turkic name referring to Genghis Khan. The Xiognu (Turkic people in West-China) allied with the Mongols to defeat the Chinese. That's why the Chinese wall was build in the first place, to keep out the Turks and Mongols. Peace.

  • Yes, the wall was built to keep them out but they just rode round it. I have a lot of respect for the Mongol empire which never came into conflict with Britain and even allied to Crusaders for part of the crusades.

  • Yes, that is also the point where the mongol influence disappeared in Central Asia, because they were attacking Turkic people like Ozbeks, Turkmens, Kazachs, Azeri's, Turks etc. They allied with the wrong people, because none of the crusades actually worked out, the Turks stopped most of them.

  • biggest empires in history were mongolic and turkic empires.

  • no we were never a part of china. but china used to be part of khubilai's empire which is mongolian empire. later china and mongolia were under manchu's control, but manchu is not china.

  • the time that china fall down is coming. take care bitches

  • GUYS seriously NONE OF you have proof that Genghis Khan is or isnt chinese or mongolian

    hes parents could be european or african or asian or alien who knows?

    there is no real proof

    by real proof means REAL proof

    not your daily history text book you read in high school these days which talk about how democracy is GREATEST THING EVER for people in asia i Guess would be Communist greatest ever

    dont trust these 100%

    what am trying to say is that dont start a argument about dead histroy...

  • Loved it.

  • waw y they showing genghis khan to be a hero he was worse then hitler all he did was slaughter innocent people and wage wars his empire was huge partialy because no 1 wanted most the land it wa short lived and all he should be remmbered for is the genecide he commited after each conquest and no have a heroic epic made after him unless it shows him to be an evil sadistic man this film will be historical in accurate but may be fun to watch still

  • to aldaraa:

    wow, you are a racist little turd aren't you?

  • well, i wasn't before, but some chinese people are forcing me to be a racist against them. you don't know how they act, as if everything is related to them. just see how they are trying to make tibet part of china. i can't stand it.

  • i know what you mean the chinese often talk about genghis khan as if he was chinese when in fact he was a mongol who handed them there arses

  • nobody gives a fuck what you think. Your just jealous because China is a big powerful country and Mongolia has done fuck all for the world. You are seriously stupid and pathetic!!!! hahaha

  • hey i didn't want to be mean. but i think you misundertood from the beginning.goodbelle wrote that on this trailer they shouldn't be using chinese character (not actor, but writing language).because mongolians do not use or understand chinese.so goodbelle is not being racist at all.try read everything again.that's why i said you are being rude and confusing. so let's just forget it. i said "chink" to the person who said Mongolians are chinese. would you like being called someone who you are not?

  • Yeah, whatever that little ramble just meant. Your just backing down because you got owned, you failed to prove your point through lack of understanding the English language. Also you are racist you cant condone calling someone "chink", again your just bitter because the Chinese are better than you in all aspects. ONCE A RACIST ALWAYS A RACIST

  • i am just explaining everything and trying to let go. you are still young. so you are not accepting that you have mistaken. now you are trying to change the subject into racism. and read more carefully again. there are nobody who said CHINESE CHARACTERS should not be starred in the movie. if you trying to keep on saying racism don't reply please. i am saying this argument started from misunderstanding. your point is pointless.

  • That didnt even make sense. To put it in your own words you are "trying to let go" basically you want me to stop commenting because you are embarassed about being a racist. You got caught you said "chink" this is nothing to do with what i originally said you are a RACIST. Also i may be young but im old enough to know a filthy racist when i see one.

    Try writing in English i can understand next time please or make a reasonable argument not a pathetic cry for help!!!

  • Hey kid, u don't understand anything.

  • hey man, why cant you stand it huh? seriously does tibet has anything to do with your life????? do you really care about life over there in tibet? let me tell you this there is more than 50 eithnics inside mainland china.... if you call them by their specific name than wow its too much

    so you call them chinese

    but its true they are all related and united and is under one country

    which sooon in the US there will be lots of eithnics soon...

    same with tibet, they are related in someway

  • They put Chinese characters in there to make it more sensible and understandable for North American audiences. These people have a hard time understanding there are other Asiatic people other than Chinese with their own language, culture, script, and history.

  • applaud!!! probably that's the only reason. these people will never understand.

  • Why the hell they used Chinese characters. We never ever used it. The movie is a crap and the trailer with Chinese makes it even worse.

  • Maybe because genghis khan was a mongol not chinese!!! Oh would you prefer tom cruise to play one of the most famous asain icons in history. You stupid dick piece of advice keep your opinions to yourself

  • are you crazy. can you read and comprehend properly. seems like you agree that chinese character doesn't fit in this movie. but why are being so rude? i don't get you stupid piece of dick.

  • Of course i dont agree with that. Genghis Khan wasn't chinese he was a Momgol from the central asian steps. I was merely commenting on how racist that person was being about the whole thing. And come up with a better insult than you stupid piece of dick if you are going to try and offend. And speak English properly so i can understand you!!!

  • if english is your first language write something better than this. you are being racist and rude as well. and spell Mongol right. why are you being so serious about this. if you are not mongolian or chinese this is not your business ok. get lost. it's our history and we don't want anybody to mess up with it.

  • How am i being racist???? I think its bad that other people want to exclude chinese actors. I think all races should be considered not because of what they look like but on how good they are as actors. If your understanding of English was any good at all you might be able to pick up that i am not a racist. In one of our comments you called someone a "chink" if im not mistaken that is a racist term?? Finally i will not get lost as there is such a thing as FREEDOM of speech!!! Dickhead

  • you are definitely stupid. i mean you couldn't comprehend two sentences clearly and now you are embarrassed of that and trying to change the subject. get a life!!! i don't have anything to say. you can just curse me however you would like. i don't care whatever you say because you seriously have something wrong with your brain. I wasn't talking about actors. I was talking about chinese characters, a writing language.

  • ahaha!! you still are not adressing the fact that you called someone a "chink" its so funny. Also its funny because you obviously got somone to write that last comment for you because it kind of made sense. Somebody did say "why are they using chinese actors" it might have been taken in a different context but it is still racist. I can "curse" you because your scum. If i need to get a life why do you keep coming back to comment here!!

    My brains fine, im british so im better than you anyway lol!

  • what you gonna do if i am a racist. who says if you are british you are better. i called someone chink, because that someone said all mongolians are chinese. would like to be called irish???

  • So you amith your a racist then AT LAST!!! Looks like you wrote that last comment yourself because it didnt make sense again LOL! Also it wouldnt bother me if someone called me Irish because im not Irish, so it doesnt bother me. Come on being British is much better than been Mongolian what has your country ever done for the world

  • I'm Irish and you're a complete idiot... you're the stereotype that many English people try to get away from (speaking of English friends of mine)... what the hell good did your country ever do to the world except force your 'civilization' onto innocent people... i presume you love your queen so you're not really worth the energy.

  • I dont love the queen as it goes. I was just winding that aldaraa girl up, i dont think im better because im english. Theres no need to be so bitter i didnt kill any irish people. That girl was actaully quite racist on a number of occasions. Im not the streotype, i hate the queen, fish and chips and the entire country its a shit hole. This is nothing to do with you so keep your nose out pal...

  • Fair enough... the sentance 'come on being british is much better then being Mongolian what has your country ever done for the world' bugged me so i reacted. If i over-reacted i apologise. (fish & chips can be nice sometimes tho ;-))

  • No worries i simply wrote that comment in annoyance at how racist that girl. I can understand how annoying it would sound to someone who had just read it. I prefer kebabs to fish and chips to be honest

  • Well i prefer pizza to them both so there you go ;-)

  • At that time, Mongol is a part of China.

  • dumbass. read more.

  • hahaha. thats what you think stupid chink!!!

    once i read in china, Chingis is chinese national hero. isnt funny?! if its real, im gonna kill millions of chinks and after 800years, ill be national hero???

    Guys its big chance to be a great hero in china...kkke...

  • chinese were the mongolians slaves.

    dont read your chinese history. its all fixed by your chinese red government.

  • racist....

  • mongol are also chinese

  • ignorant fool stfu

  • Are you a gay or shemale?

  • yeah right read stupid chink.

  • Mongolians are not chinese. chinese are not mongolians.

    chinese were mongolian slaves. thats it...

  • This film is based on 'The Secret History' and has been endorsed both by the Mongolian nation and John Man, who has written one of the most widely respected books on Genghis Khan, ('Genghis Khan, Life, Death and Resurrection' - which i recommend u read if you want more indepth insight into the history)... fyi - the Chinese symbols are only in the trailer, not the movie - and so your comments imply that you are judging the movie unseen!! (That's how much more stupid this can get!!!)

  • Nice!!!

  • shit movie, inaccurate history, retarded white russian director putting chinese symbols in a movie depicting mongols. How much stupider can get this get?

  • I think the film looks pretty good.

    And as for the chinese text, I think it could be appropriate. I believe this film is just about the early life of Temujin. And as anyone who's studied his history knows, he didn't commission the uyghur script until sometime into his reign. So the 'chinese symbols' are contemporaneous as any other.

    Anyone know when this film's out in the UK?

  • No its not appropriate because the Mongol nomads never, ever adopted Chinese as a writing script. Before they had Uighur script, they were either illiterate or used Turkic runic scripture. Why do you think they went through so much trouble to adopt Semitic style scripts when there was a perfectly good writing script nearby in China? Becuz they didn't want to. And the film sucks, inaccurate history. But for average, know nothing movie goers, it might be something.

  • all the british are irish origin!!!

  • Great trailer. Looking forward to seeing the movie!!!

  • This movie looks amazing, can't wait to see it!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more