@Blahblobify IT A PITY THEY DIDNT TEACH YOU ANY MANNERS. YOU ARE ACTIONS HERE ARE DISGRACE TO YOUR CREED. BUT THEN THATS WHY THEY RETIRED YOU OFF EARLY...DEADWOOD.
ok, your arguments seem reasonable guys:) I'm just saying, I don't know what to think about it, I'm neither denying the possibility that there were moon landings, nor do I fully believe that there were. Nothing is black or white for me, there are pleny of colours in between
if the usa sent so many missions to the moon between 1969-1972 why is it so f***ing hard to send people to the moon Nowadays??? Why has nobody been there ever since and why has America been preparing for the next flight to the moon for the last 10 years or so??? If they were able to do it back in 1970s why is it so hard now ?
@ksjarek It's expensive. We have not been preparing for more moon landings nor will there be any for the time being as any such plans were cancelled by Obama. The USA, Russia, and China are the only countries that have ever sent people to space without the use of another countries space program. And China's space program is severely underdeveloped. It is not that we do not have the ability to send people to the moon; we just do not have the aspiration to.
@ksjarek Also, the majority of the US population is disinterested with the space program. In the 60's and 70's people were very interested and involved in the space program.
@hpolastrini, or maybe because people believe Paris is all that's real because they are retards and enjoy following the fantasy life of a "celebrity".
Rio de janeiro.I thank the government, Nasa and taxpayer yankees for the beautiful effort of space exploration. It was 1 done of the humanity without no other country paid the bill. Even so, my admiration for the facts not only of his country as of others that went to the space. Since I am fan of star trek
@Maxhoulenabelsi Sorry Winnetou, but you're wrong. You can see photos from LRO. That's evidence from lunar activity of human. You can think that Shuttle program was fake for alternative, and you'll be wrong too. There's no point for thinking that Apollo missions was fake.
Trying to convince a Hoaxer the landings were real is like trying to potty train a newborn infant--ain't gonna happen any time soon. I am pleased to announce, after several days of perusing the internet, that the MOON HOAX Movement is dead, save for a few stragglers and some foreigners with weird accents
"That's a lovely lift off !!!...that's not bad at all..." What a wonderful, wonderful, thing to say to those men-those ultimately brave men. Just a perfevt thing to say at that moment when any human, even these remarkable men, would be in a state of, shall we say, stress ? Who is the man who said those words? he deserves a medal just for that. Truly inspirational film. Me, I'd personally pay £200 a year, at least to get us to Mars...IIf every citizen the same? we'd be at Io by now...
Anybody that thinks this is fake, please explain to me how they faked the ASCENT footage on 11 AND 12. Now remember, this was 1969, WAY BEFFORE CGI. How did thy fake the ASCENT footage?? If you have not seen it, go to NASA .gov to do so...... PLEASE tell me, cuz I want to know.... If you don't know then shut your LYING hole. If you do know, enlighten me....
@dalek14mc this is so fake its ridiculous and I cant believe its actually taken legitimately among so many people. not even the space program its self will claim any truth
@tayneli Where`s the proof of a hoax? why didn`t the USSR expose a hoax? It would have been a huge PR win for the soviets.Why haven`t the 1000s of experts in geology,physics,maths and astronomy from all over the world who have studied the apollo data,samples and footage exposed a hoax? Why did Nixon,who supposedly pulled of the biggest hoax in history(apollo) then make such a mess 5 years later of a much smaller plot(watergate) that he was forced to resign?
The enthusiasm in Al Bean's voice during the landing sequence is truly remarkable. You can really hear the excitement as they descend lower and closer to the lunar surface. Apollo 12 had to be one of the best demonstrations of team work amongst the Apollo crews!
The enthusiasm in Al Bean's voice during the landing sequence is truly remarkable. You can really hear the excitement as they descend lower and closer to the lunar surface. Apollo 12 had to be one of the best demonstrations of team work amongst the Apollo crews!
@masternoob1911 Counting fail! 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17. thats SIX, but Apollo 13 did go into space making it SEVEN. Besides why would they not fake 13 if "none of them made it to the moon"
I watch Apollo 11 mission live on TV. The landing spawned video games of the 1970s Lunar Lander and Space War. I played them on the PDP 12 (see my photo).
This vid has the best landing sequence I have seen since the actual landings. The hight and fuel readouts, the attitude alterations and looking through the windows as they saw it. No music, no cutting, superb !! Thanks for posting iafastro.
("Humble opinion" bypass operations are available nowadays I understand.)
in my humble opinion: you can not fake the waves caused by the astronauts while walking, jumping or falling.. assuming they slowed down the movie then also the waves would be afected right? I remind you that those waves say it all!
PS: I'm sad: no more crappy hoax theorists around after this final proof.
Guys landed on the perfect place, so we wouldn't notice the nso that POPULATED THE MOON. Sereously atleast let people know `bout it guys, not like we got to uncover ur SECRET NASA SPEECH that you recorded. Plus accidently for 2 hours on google earth you could've seen the takeoff and nso "base" on the moon, unfortunantely after that it "accidently" went grey "becouse the photos were forbidden"...
I would like to punch fags that told it over to google earth team...
thats not the Apollo 12 launch at the start thats another one i forgot which one but i know for certain that isn't Apollo 12s it might of been Apollo 11s on the video but im not a 100% sure which Apollo mission that was but i can tell you its not Apollo 17 that was a night launch
oguzzie totally agre with you over paris hilton. Pete Conrad was said to be a real character within the Apollo space programme. I believe there is geuine film footage of the Apollo 12 astronauts teasing mission control with beaming back pictures of 'vibrators' on their CM 'dashboard' on their way to the moon! Seriously-maybe someone find footage of that and viewers will then go up in their millions.
I thought it was pouring down rain during this liftoff. I know for sure that the rocket was struck by lightening... During the liftoff in this video there is blue skies!!! Im 30y/o so I wasnt alive when this happened so can anyone tell me what Im missing here???
The landing sequence makes me nervous. "Such and such percent of fuel...plenty of gas... bring her down" end the like. I think that those people had nerves made of steel! One has to be patient, cold blooded and pay attention to 8 items at the same time, leave alone not waste fuel and not to crash the LEM
Sorry..I'm no engineer. But after Apollo 11 and how Neil was only 15 sec away from no fuel, and by this video Apollo 12 was close to no fuel by the time they landed. Why did NASA did not anticipate this? Why could they not place another 10-15% of more fuel? Does a little extra fuel cause problems landing, surely it's better to have more fuel then running out and free falling?
As the independent lunar photographic evidence mounts (LCROSS, Chandrayaan-1 this week alone), I for one will be fascinated to watch the hoaxers continue their arguments...
So the whole of NASA are in on this conspiracy, the current NASA generation including the LCROSS teams from universities and institutions from the United States and around the world. And is it the whole of ISRO or just a subsection of the Indian Space Research Organization? Are these being paid off?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I guess you've never worked for the government, or know what the word compartmental means.
And I suppose in your Apollo Fairy Tale world, gamma ray bursts, x-ray flares, solar wind, solar flares, secondary neutron radiation coming from the surface of the billions of years lunar surface are just figments of my imagination. 100's of millions of solar particles in every square inch of space, every second, is just fantasy?
RIGHT?
Wake up from your NASA-induced coma, and join the AWARE!
Slob...er...Rob....doesn't have the intellectual prowess to directly address the anomolies that prove Apollo was faked. Instead he, like all nasty, little, troll, shills, tries to attack the individual. Attempts to make them defend themselves. Well, my service requires no defense. It's honorable! Unlike the crap, scum like Slob..er..Rob pulls!
So the whole of NASA are in on this conspiracy, the current NASA generation including the LCROSS teams from universities and institutions from the United States and around the world.
How long do you think NASA would continue to be funded, if the fact that they defrauded American taxpayers for tens to hundreds of billions of dollars from it's inception until the beginning of the shuttle program?
Logically speaking, why don't you explain how flesh and blood beings were subjected to deadly amounts of radiation, and are still running around over 40 years later with no obvious signs of the damage it should have done. For christs sake, they should have never lived long enough to set foot on the moon...Let alone return and be running around 40 years later. Do a quick search on nerve damage caused by low-dose radiation treatments...and WAKE UP!
Talking about fourty........... most conspiracists think they are smarter than 40 years worth of scientists, engineers, astronomers, physicists, geologists........
The van Allen belts are regions above the Earth's surface where the Earth's magnetic field has trapped particles of the solar wind. An unprotected person would get a lethal dose of radiation if they stayed there long enough. Apollo travelled through the belts in an hour or so. Also the metal hull of the spaceship blocks most of the radiation anyway.
Hour and a half eh Rob? FInally a quote I can laugh at. I guess you are desperate to look serious.
Would that be three hours then, seeing as how it was a round trip? Maybe you'd like to review Van Allens orginal scientifically, peer-reviewed numbers on the REM count in the VAB's and see why 0.167 is completely unbelievable. And of course, you should continue ignoring all the other radiation, SOLAR, GAMMA, SECONDARY (shielding, and lunar)...As well as micrometeorites, XRAYS, etc...
I see you are the real radiation specialist here soldier. Well, think about leaving all the crap here on YouTube and participate in a REAL scientific platform on the internet.
Ricky, the 'deadly' VA radiation belts are composed mostly of low energy Alpha particles.
Dangerous due to their high density but dense because they are magnetically contained. They are composed of two main sections which are truncated toroidal in shape, and relatively thin.
Provided that a craft does not remain for any length of time in the most dense regions, an acceptable and minimally dangerous exposure level is easily achieved.
Two trips through the VAB's would have subjected the dosimeter/astronauts to levels amazing missing from that displayed by NASA's Apollo records. Van Allens geiger counters pegged out....Even while shielded by lead. Let's not minimilize the dangers of the VAB Scott...According to Plait, they have to shut down the electronics on the Hubble, when it makes the quick transit through the SAA.
Why don't you just ignore all the other space radiation hazards, and keep the focus on just the VAB, so you can quote a time article that tries to deny the dangers, with a supposed quote from Van Allen in complete opposition to his own, peer-reviewed scientific proof that unmanned missions would be the only safe way to transit the belts until appropriate shielding was developed. The same shielding that has yet to be developed to this day. A simple radiation shielding search will confirm that.
James Van Allen rebutted the claims that radiation levels were too dangerous for the Apollo missions in 1971 in a paper presented to that year's IAC.
Dosimeters carried by the crews showed they received about the same cumulative dosage as a chest X-ray or about 1 milligray. Plait cited an average dose of less than 1 rem, which is equivalent to the ambient radiation received by living at sea level for three years.
Furthermore, electronics and human bodies are very different beasts.
Dosimeters carried by the crews showed they received about the same cumulative dosage as a chest X-ray or about 1 milligray.
chest X-rays last how long? They were in space, surrounded by ISOTROPIC GCR's, constant solar wind, and extra blasts from solar flares, MAJOR solar flares, lunar, and craft secondary radiation for DAYS.
KNOWING that, and then trying to sell one chest X-ray worth of exposure, makes you one of the most purposefully ignorant, or delusional fools on the planet!
Apollo 17 was the longest Moon mission and latest 12 days.
Valeri Polyakov was onboard Mir for 437 days. He is still alive and well.
Mir was continually manned from September 1989 until August 1999, a span of 3644 days. Most of the cosmonauts onboard spent longer than the 12 days that Apollo 17 spent in space. Nearly all are still alive. None of these cosmonauts, to my knowledge, have died of space-induced cancer.
Mir is well within the comfort zone provided by the magnetosphere...You SHOULD know that!
It is not assaulted by constant solar wind, solar flare, and ISOTROPIC GCR's. And obviously they wouldn't be affected by the secondary craft, and lunar radiation!
Use applicable bullshit excuses there Scott!
So the excuse is rather lame...Now, don't you think?
Evaluating shielding effectiveness for reducing space radiation cancer risks
Francis A. Cucinottaa, Myung-Hee Y. Kimb, Lei Renc
For short-stay lunar missions, solar particle events (SPE). present the most significant risk, however one that is mitigated effectively by shielding, especially for carbon composites structures with high hydrogen content. In contrast, for long duration lunar or Mars missions, GCR risks may exceed radiation risk limits that are based on acceptable levels of risk.
If your answer is yes to those questions...Then how can you possibly buy Apollo anymore. Are you that weak you cannot admit you were fooled? Is your ego in control of your mind, or your brain? Because your brain, SHOULD be able to smell the skunk that was Apollo!
Seems there is another Dutch victim of the petrified moonwood around Ricky. Ofcourse your pal Strawfag will say that it's one my other 'sockpuppet' nicks, but nevermind.
For the 84th time: do you really think you are smarter than 40 years and several generations worth of radiation experts?
Speaking of respect, un4g1v3n1. It would be really nice if you treated the other users of this channel with some, rather than name calling and insults...
No, I am not Svector Ricky. I laugh about this 'conviction' of you guys. I am not Entropy, Delahaye, Thirdclass, Krisdevalle, BlisterHiker, LindaStevens, Shanedk, FractalD, BagFullOfP, Snakehip, SecretSquare, LunarTuner, Endlessdream, Mainframe, AbelMagwitch, Jcgmed, CusterApollo, Airbuzz, Charliegoodboy, Pjwarez, SpreadingtheMuse, Guitarplayer4real either, to name a random few.
And I have no problem. However... I have a lot of free time.
I have some questions about sociology and culture:
(1) Why do we have a preception that aerospace is closely related to America?
(2) Is that because Amercans' culture of freedom?
(3) How does aerospace advancement related to "American Dream"?
I would guess that aerospace is closely related to Americans' values including hard working, creative, bravery to chanllenge, determination, freedom, and liberty.
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE for your creative ideas and brainstorm!!! :)
At least there was more than a semblance of constructive endeavour in 1969 with the Apollo program up to and including Apollo 12. Today's space exploration seems to be about those stupid, senile old dickheads actually murdering tens of millions of dollars on a space trip, lasting a few hours, into near Earth orbit, and they convince themselves they've achieved something incredibly special. Talk about not having a life, or needing to get a life! But: Bravo Gordon, Bean, and Conrad! Three greats!
Okay, so dont get me involved in the whole conspiracy theory debate thats plagued this comments page but sometimes I feel that man didnt have the complete know-how or technology to safely go to the moon and back in 1969! And now we're not even sure we can make it to the moon by 2020. The only thing that would really be convincing is if I could peer through a telescope and see some of the remaining equipment and the flag with my own eyes. No offence to anyone
So why did NASA stop all lunar exploration missions (manned)? Thats my question, we could have learned so much if they continued going every two years. Also, I'm surprised why the Soviet Union didnt make it up there first. They were way ahead of the US in space and propulsion.
It is a matter of very public record that NASA would have LOVED to continue exploring the moon. Congress slashed the budget after public interest waned and other issues were deemed more important. Really, it is no secret. Money drives all this. Money will drive how soon we return. It is not (and hasn't been) a matter of know-how but of budget and priorities.
One of the coolest things about the Apollo 12 mission was the fact that they landed close (512 feet) from Surveyor 3, the unmanned soft-landing probe that was sent to the moon 2.5 years before that mission. They brought back the TV camera and other pieces of Surveyor which are now on display at the Smithsonian.
how is it that one generation can achieve something as incredible as landing a man on the moon and all that the next can achieve is deny that it ever happened, this generation couldnt land a cow pat on a manure pile. I blame liberalism its created a generation of semi-literate retards
I think that's part of it. The kids from my generation did not have car seats, helmets for riding their bikes and a host of other things that today's PC world thinks are so necessary. It seems to me that we are raising weak, wussies these days who will never have the balls, grit and determination to accomplish what the men of the Apollo program did. One can only hope that those great achievements will inspire the youth of today.
"I blame liberalism its created a generation of semi-literate retards"
Interestingly, that sentence is semi-literate.
The idea that liberalism generates public stupidity is baffling, and suggests you don't really know what liberalism is. Conservatism, meanwhile, with its brainiac figureheads like George W Bush and Sarah Palin, keeps churning out those genii who don't believe in climate change and think the Earth is 6000 years old.
Who enabled the Apollo program, anyway? JFK and LBJ.
Go to nasa's youtube profile, simply type in nasa and search, then click on there profile pic, once there look under where it says report profile image violation, click the tab that says nasa history, click the tab that says lro sees apollo landing sites, scroll down a little bit and there ya go. pictures of the Lm's
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
What a joke!
'You may fool all the people some of the time; you can even fool some of the people all the time; but you can't fool all the people all the time'. (Abe Lincoln)
It is time for America to admit the moon landings were faked.... and at least attempt to regain what little credibility she has left.
Yes they went into space...but not out to the moon and back... Not even Space Shuttle can do that...
Not even space shuttle can do that? Are you serious? The shuttle was not designed for going to the moon. I think its time for folks like you to speak out more so we all can get a good laugh at you.
Escaping Earth's gravity is the biggest hurdle ... Once you are up there you could go any where you wanted... including out to the moon and back... (DID I SAY SHUTTLE COULD LAND ON IT ... No! So shut the fuck up)
It seem the biggest hurdle ithe world has to face is the over zealous patriotism of dumb ars Yanks.
the moon is 384,000 km away, Space Shuttle has only flown to a height of 611 km above earth.... Those van Allen Radiation belts which start at 1000 km above earth sort of fuck up any story about flying out to the moon in 1969...
This is not to dispute that passage through the Van Allen belts would be dangerous. But NASA conducted a series of experiments designed to investigate the nature of the Van Allen belts, culminating in the repeated traversal of the Southern Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly (an intense, low-hanging patch of Van Allen belt) by the Gemini 10 astronauts.
While such drastic measures are needed to shield against intense, high-frequency electromagnetic radiation, that is not the nature of the radiation in the Van Allen belts. In fact, because the Van Allen belts are composed of high-energy protons and high-energy electrons, metal shielding is actually counterproductive because of the Bremsstrahlung that would be induced.
your right, a space shuttle didnt go to the moon and back, a lunar module did that part lol, the shuttle just launched them into space. We did make it to the moon, powerful telescopes prove that we did, also the man made objects that are up there. If we didnt make it there, how did those get there? weird huh? You might wanna brush up on your facts a little before making stupid comments like that...sorry to say.
There is not one photograph in existance taken by a powerful telescope to prove that there is a luna module on the moon... Find the proof stupid dickwad!
Thats because no telescope has the resolving power to capture small details like that on the moon's surface. The LRO however HAS returned many photos in the last week of all the Apollo landing sites, confirming what sane people have known for 40 years. 12 men landed on the moon over 6 missions.
haha LRO apollo pics has proved u cts wrong and rightly so,if it went for the apollo program you would not even have a microwave to cook your dinner what you stuff into your gob while typing such purile utter nonsense,jelous little punks
In the series From Earth to The Moon, we see the APollo 12 astronauts removing the video camera from the lunar module, after they found the other camera, that was to be put on a stand on the lunar surface, was broked. Why there is jo video from the lunar module videocamera after they remove it ?
jerry, they only brought one TV camera at a time (at least on the first missions). I'm not sure what From Earth To The Moon has. Are you sure it wasn't a film camera rather than a TV camera?
It's show two astronauts removing one camera from the exterior lunar module. They used a tool to cut out the scrsws to be able to take off the camera.
I will search the video on youtube again. I think was a spanish idiom translated from the series.
what a stupid mother fuckers with they are lie brain washing the hole nation, first of all they never ever been close to the moon,and even if they ever have them stupid assholes they been to the dark side of the moon where there is no light its closer for us to reach the surface of it that's just a fuckin lie like they claim that Jesus is god and the trinity fuckin brain washed dog's
I try not to get involved in the Fake/Non Fake debates on the channel but I'd like to answer this one since nobody has.
My answer would be to try it for yourself - wait for a dark night, take a photo of something in the foreground and see if you see stars on your photo.
Indeed if the moon missions were faked, the presence of stars would have been all wrong had they added them. It would mean that they were closer to the subject than light years away - it's a depth of field/f stop thing.
Thanks for reply, iastro, you make some good points. I'll give the night shot thing a try and let you know how I fare.
It does sound as though you've looked at both sides of the story, very sensible, and have yet to come to a conclusion either way. I am undecided about the Apollo moon landings. For many reasons I believe that they may have been faked but at the same time I still think it is possible that it wasn't. The moon surface laser reflectors are a tricky one to answer if we didn't go.
Comment removed
Blahblobify 2 weeks ago
@Blahblobify IT A PITY THEY DIDNT TEACH YOU ANY MANNERS. YOU ARE ACTIONS HERE ARE DISGRACE TO YOUR CREED. BUT THEN THATS WHY THEY RETIRED YOU OFF EARLY...DEADWOOD.
007bondspy 2 weeks ago
Very nice jazz soundtrack. Who is that?
HaywoodZarathustra 1 month ago
/watch?v=woHgQdKsvRk&feature=related
InfamousRavage 1 month ago
FAKE
jerichomutant 2 months ago
ok, your arguments seem reasonable guys:) I'm just saying, I don't know what to think about it, I'm neither denying the possibility that there were moon landings, nor do I fully believe that there were. Nothing is black or white for me, there are pleny of colours in between
:)
ksjarek 3 months ago
if the usa sent so many missions to the moon between 1969-1972 why is it so f***ing hard to send people to the moon Nowadays??? Why has nobody been there ever since and why has America been preparing for the next flight to the moon for the last 10 years or so??? If they were able to do it back in 1970s why is it so hard now ?
ksjarek 3 months ago
@ksjarek It's expensive. We have not been preparing for more moon landings nor will there be any for the time being as any such plans were cancelled by Obama. The USA, Russia, and China are the only countries that have ever sent people to space without the use of another countries space program. And China's space program is severely underdeveloped. It is not that we do not have the ability to send people to the moon; we just do not have the aspiration to.
thisnameistotallybad 3 months ago
@ksjarek Also, the majority of the US population is disinterested with the space program. In the 60's and 70's people were very interested and involved in the space program.
thisnameistotallybad 3 months ago
@oguzzie Maybe because Paris Hilton Interview was real?
hpolastrini 3 months ago
@hpolastrini, or maybe because people believe Paris is all that's real because they are retards and enjoy following the fantasy life of a "celebrity".
745917203views 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Rio de janeiro.I thank the government, Nasa and taxpayer yankees for the beautiful effort of space exploration. It was 1 done of the humanity without no other country paid the bill. Even so, my admiration for the facts not only of his country as of others that went to the space. Since I am fan of star trek
aczjbr 4 months ago
all apollo is fake
Maxhoulenabelsi 4 months ago
@Maxhoulenabelsi Sorry Winnetou, but you're wrong. You can see photos from LRO. That's evidence from lunar activity of human. You can think that Shuttle program was fake for alternative, and you'll be wrong too. There's no point for thinking that Apollo missions was fake.
kuki5050 4 months ago
@Maxhoulenabelsi
you twat.
utter utter no brain twat.
What I find so laughable about people like you is your inability to accept and admire other humans who achieved things. really achieved things.
Stereolabdream 3 months ago in playlist Liked videos
This has been flagged as spam show
Trying to convince a Hoaxer the landings were real is like trying to potty train a newborn infant--ain't gonna happen any time soon. I am pleased to announce, after several days of perusing the internet, that the MOON HOAX Movement is dead, save for a few stragglers and some foreigners with weird accents
charliegoodboy 5 months ago
Comment removed
charliegoodboy 5 months ago
"That's a lovely lift off !!!...that's not bad at all..." What a wonderful, wonderful, thing to say to those men-those ultimately brave men. Just a perfevt thing to say at that moment when any human, even these remarkable men, would be in a state of, shall we say, stress ? Who is the man who said those words? he deserves a medal just for that. Truly inspirational film. Me, I'd personally pay £200 a year, at least to get us to Mars...IIf every citizen the same? we'd be at Io by now...
Stereolabdream 5 months ago
Check out the LRO Pictures of the landing sites from Moon orbit.
Gabrielskip 6 months ago
So fake...
A1ekzz 6 months ago
@A1ekzz you conspiracy loons are absolutely brain dead
AroundSun 5 months ago
@oguzzie LOTS, its a damn shame what we are coming to, i hate humans.
glitchez 6 months ago
Anybody that thinks this is fake, please explain to me how they faked the ASCENT footage on 11 AND 12. Now remember, this was 1969, WAY BEFFORE CGI. How did thy fake the ASCENT footage?? If you have not seen it, go to NASA .gov to do so...... PLEASE tell me, cuz I want to know.... If you don't know then shut your LYING hole. If you do know, enlighten me....
TheBigMamao 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We are AwE130 we doubt Apollo put a man on the moon.
Peace to you
awe130 8 months ago
Damn, that soundstage must be the size of the moon!!!!
dalek14mc 9 months ago
@dalek14mc this is so fake its ridiculous and I cant believe its actually taken legitimately among so many people. not even the space program its self will claim any truth
Chosen7777 8 months ago
@Chosen7777-What are you talking about? The space program DOES claim truth.
"its ridiculous"
Yeah, because no hoax-head has ever made a ridiculous claim. Seriously, if you believe the moon landings were faked, then I feel sorry for you.
dalek14mc 8 months ago 5
@masternoob1911
Jesus kid, 17-11 does equal 6, but OMGWTFBBQ COUNT them you stupit fuckwat, there were 6 manned landings.
Silly teenage twats today are so goddamnit to hell ignorant
Blahblobify 9 months ago
is fake for sure
tayneli 10 months ago
@tayneli Where`s the proof of a hoax? why didn`t the USSR expose a hoax? It would have been a huge PR win for the soviets.Why haven`t the 1000s of experts in geology,physics,maths and astronomy from all over the world who have studied the apollo data,samples and footage exposed a hoax? Why did Nixon,who supposedly pulled of the biggest hoax in history(apollo) then make such a mess 5 years later of a much smaller plot(watergate) that he was forced to resign?
swfcocs1 10 months ago 5
@swfcocs1 Tell me this, if its not a hoax where are the moon people, the mooninites?
PrunVeIes 2 months ago
The enthusiasm in Al Bean's voice during the landing sequence is truly remarkable. You can really hear the excitement as they descend lower and closer to the lunar surface. Apollo 12 had to be one of the best demonstrations of team work amongst the Apollo crews!
rocantr 11 months ago
The enthusiasm in Al Bean's voice during the landing sequence is truly remarkable. You can really hear the excitement as they descend lower and closer to the lunar surface. Apollo 12 had to be one of the best demonstrations of team work amongst the Apollo crews!
rocantr 11 months ago
@masternoob1911 Counting fail! 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17. thats SIX, but Apollo 13 did go into space making it SEVEN. Besides why would they not fake 13 if "none of them made it to the moon"
blaixx992 11 months ago
seriously, u just cant fake such a thing, soo many people work for nasa, soo many people are involved...... its just impossible to fake it....
Shubag123 11 months ago
FANTASTIC!
its all put together perfectly.
VarthBlitz 1 year ago
I watch Apollo 11 mission live on TV. The landing spawned video games of the 1970s Lunar Lander and Space War. I played them on the PDP 12 (see my photo).
dwm10251 1 year ago
I watch Apollo 11 mission live on TV.
dwm10251 1 year ago
This vid has the best landing sequence I have seen since the actual landings. The hight and fuel readouts, the attitude alterations and looking through the windows as they saw it. No music, no cutting, superb !! Thanks for posting iafastro.
("Humble opinion" bypass operations are available nowadays I understand.)
BunkyOhare 1 year ago
in my humble opinion: you can not fake the waves caused by the astronauts while walking, jumping or falling.. assuming they slowed down the movie then also the waves would be afected right? I remind you that those waves say it all!
PS: I'm sad: no more crappy hoax theorists around after this final proof.
elevenby2 1 year ago
@oguzzie The path to enlightenment is narrow .Rejoice
peterm3964 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The moon missions were faked in a studio. Here's a link to some of the evidence.
3W's (dot) spurstalk (dot) com/forums/showthread (dot) php?t=144487
Cosmored2 1 year ago
Idk why some people think the moon landings are fake, you can see clearly that it is not
utimo1122 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Neil Armstrong..."and parrots don't fly very well"
Ironoff 1 year ago
Beano!
redhat11 1 year ago
that beginning lift off was fucking awesome!
andyct1982 1 year ago
@andyct1982 i know people that have whitnessed an Apollo launch and they say the roar of the Saturn V is a beauty all it's own.
coltsfan79 1 year ago
Guys landed on the perfect place, so we wouldn't notice the nso that POPULATED THE MOON. Sereously atleast let people know `bout it guys, not like we got to uncover ur SECRET NASA SPEECH that you recorded. Plus accidently for 2 hours on google earth you could've seen the takeoff and nso "base" on the moon, unfortunantely after that it "accidently" went grey "becouse the photos were forbidden"...
I would like to punch fags that told it over to google earth team...
FearlessLT 1 year ago
Everything inside that space craft was analog, no digital.
josh71111 1 year ago
U.S. society has declined radically since the days of Apollo.
It's a real tragedy.
AcePilot2009 1 year ago 2
Nobody ever went to the moon you must be dumb.
nano63a 2 years ago
@nano63a
Yes, we did.
Rob260259 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fake
cheesetaco23 2 years ago
if it takes 3 days to get to the moon, how do they refuel?
STATUSthesleepers 2 years ago
At the moon-based refill station. They just pull up and honk their horn.
carywat 2 years ago
L'uomo se veramente ha fatto ciò perche non viene ripetuto con tutte le tecnolologie che abbiamo ora
GRAZIANO782 2 years ago
R.I.P. Pete Conrad
ApolloProgramWasReal 2 years ago
2:58am Wednesday (CST) - Time in Mississippi, United States of America
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
Thanks to Arthur Clark !
sygma707 2 years ago
1969 : At that time their protective gears would have to kill them (in the long run) by solar radiations (Between Earth and Moon)
sygma707 2 years ago
thats not the Apollo 12 launch at the start thats another one i forgot which one but i know for certain that isn't Apollo 12s it might of been Apollo 11s on the video but im not a 100% sure which Apollo mission that was but i can tell you its not Apollo 17 that was a night launch
Australian123Gamer 2 years ago
oguzzie totally agre with you over paris hilton. Pete Conrad was said to be a real character within the Apollo space programme. I believe there is geuine film footage of the Apollo 12 astronauts teasing mission control with beaming back pictures of 'vibrators' on their CM 'dashboard' on their way to the moon! Seriously-maybe someone find footage of that and viewers will then go up in their millions.
dali366 2 years ago
I thought it was pouring down rain during this liftoff. I know for sure that the rocket was struck by lightening... During the liftoff in this video there is blue skies!!! Im 30y/o so I wasnt alive when this happened so can anyone tell me what Im missing here???
DrVegasIII 2 years ago
Your are right. Your not missing anything .This video is not the 1969 Apollo 12 launch.
24hosting 2 years ago
That's because paris is far more experienced at handling big rockets..hahaha
markzzxx 2 years ago 2
That chit there is funny.. I don't care who you are .. lmao.
24hosting 2 years ago
3:56 The landing sequence is so cool!
NeedsEvidence 2 years ago
Beautiful!
NeedsEvidence 2 years ago 3
FLY NAVY!
scotohibernicus 2 years ago
The landing sequence makes me nervous. "Such and such percent of fuel...plenty of gas... bring her down" end the like. I think that those people had nerves made of steel! One has to be patient, cold blooded and pay attention to 8 items at the same time, leave alone not waste fuel and not to crash the LEM
Andybucker 2 years ago 4
@Andybucker
Sorry..I'm no engineer. But after Apollo 11 and how Neil was only 15 sec away from no fuel, and by this video Apollo 12 was close to no fuel by the time they landed. Why did NASA did not anticipate this? Why could they not place another 10-15% of more fuel? Does a little extra fuel cause problems landing, surely it's better to have more fuel then running out and free falling?
robinho1979 1 year ago
@robinho1979 As far as I am concerned this had something to do with the weight of the vehicle.
Andybucker 1 year ago
@Andybucker what are you gonna add? a few more grams of fuel?
Kargaroc286 1 year ago
Foi bem feito o teatro.
youhlemos 2 years ago
Comment removed
youhlemos 2 years ago
Commercial airplanes are getting hit by lightning all the time and nothing happens, so what's your point?
ClinicalAttacked 2 years ago
HIt by lightning and they didn't scrub the mission. Talk about a bunch of crap already!
un4g1v3n1 2 years ago
As the independent lunar photographic evidence mounts (LCROSS, Chandrayaan-1 this week alone), I for one will be fascinated to watch the hoaxers continue their arguments...
scotthatton44 2 years ago
Independant my ass. It's a NASA program. Get your facts straight bub!
un4g1v3n1 2 years ago
So the whole of NASA are in on this conspiracy, the current NASA generation including the LCROSS teams from universities and institutions from the United States and around the world. And is it the whole of ISRO or just a subsection of the Indian Space Research Organization? Are these being paid off?
Some conspiracy. Wow!
scotthatton44 2 years ago 9
LRO - not LCROSS
iafastro 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I guess you've never worked for the government, or know what the word compartmental means.
And I suppose in your Apollo Fairy Tale world, gamma ray bursts, x-ray flares, solar wind, solar flares, secondary neutron radiation coming from the surface of the billions of years lunar surface are just figments of my imagination. 100's of millions of solar particles in every square inch of space, every second, is just fantasy?
RIGHT?
Wake up from your NASA-induced coma, and join the AWARE!
un4g1v3n1 2 years ago
Three weeks to go before LRO shows how all the un4g1v3n1-type hoaxers have been wasting their conspiratorial lives for the past few years.
promfort 2 years ago 2
Its pretty obvious you have never worked on a large project before. Altough there are seperate teams. Almost all overlap somewhere.
Gamma ray bursts? I think if a GRB was hitting the astronuts enough to kill them we would also be in a spot of bother.
Oh yeah how do we know about how strong theses radiation belts are if we didnt send spacecraft........opps
TheFluffyDuck 2 years ago
"I guess you've never worked for the government"
And why did they kick you out of the military Rick?
Rob260259 2 years ago
For the uninitiated...
NOTICE:
Slob...er...Rob....doesn't have the intellectual prowess to directly address the anomolies that prove Apollo was faked. Instead he, like all nasty, little, troll, shills, tries to attack the individual. Attempts to make them defend themselves. Well, my service requires no defense. It's honorable! Unlike the crap, scum like Slob..er..Rob pulls!
un4g1v3n1 2 years ago
Oh and me. I am awaiting my pay check.
TheFluffyDuck 2 years ago
So the whole of NASA are in on this conspiracy, the current NASA generation including the LCROSS teams from universities and institutions from the United States and around the world.
How long do you think NASA would continue to be funded, if the fact that they defrauded American taxpayers for tens to hundreds of billions of dollars from it's inception until the beginning of the shuttle program?
They have to continue to lies to survive!
PERIOD. It's scary you can't understand that!
un4g1v3n1 2 years ago
It's more scary that people choose to live in a world that makes no logical sense.
Chandrayaan finds water on the moon - true.
Chandrayaan images Apollo landing sites - false.
Same mission scientists.
So are they being half paid off?
scotthatton44 2 years ago
Logically speaking, why don't you explain how flesh and blood beings were subjected to deadly amounts of radiation, and are still running around over 40 years later with no obvious signs of the damage it should have done. For christs sake, they should have never lived long enough to set foot on the moon...Let alone return and be running around 40 years later. Do a quick search on nerve damage caused by low-dose radiation treatments...and WAKE UP!
un4g1v3n1 2 years ago
Talking about fourty........... most conspiracists think they are smarter than 40 years worth of scientists, engineers, astronomers, physicists, geologists........
Rob260259 2 years ago
I'll give it a go...
The van Allen belts are regions above the Earth's surface where the Earth's magnetic field has trapped particles of the solar wind. An unprotected person would get a lethal dose of radiation if they stayed there long enough. Apollo travelled through the belts in an hour or so. Also the metal hull of the spaceship blocks most of the radiation anyway.
scotthatton44 2 years ago
Scott, you are right, they can kill a man, if he stayed there long enough.
While passing through, the astronauts were exposed to an average radiation dose of 0.167 mSv per second.
Thirty straight days of that would have killed them.
The astronauts passed them in an hour and a half.
Rob260259 2 years ago
Hour and a half eh Rob? FInally a quote I can laugh at. I guess you are desperate to look serious.
Would that be three hours then, seeing as how it was a round trip? Maybe you'd like to review Van Allens orginal scientifically, peer-reviewed numbers on the REM count in the VAB's and see why 0.167 is completely unbelievable. And of course, you should continue ignoring all the other radiation, SOLAR, GAMMA, SECONDARY (shielding, and lunar)...As well as micrometeorites, XRAYS, etc...
un4g1v3n1 2 years ago
I see you are the real radiation specialist here soldier. Well, think about leaving all the crap here on YouTube and participate in a REAL scientific platform on the internet.
I will gladly introduce you.
Rob260259 2 years ago
"I will gladly introduce you. "
The only thing you could introduce me too is your online troll friends.
I already am aware of many of them. Spread the word to your buds...Being a troll does not qualify you as a scientist!
un4g1v3n1 2 years ago
Rick, I am not a scientist. Never said I was. Like you never said you were in the military.
Rob260259 2 years ago
And you are so much a scientist un4 that the top video category on your own channel is dedicated to the lack of stars in Apollo. Ha!
A challenge - show me any space video with stars, Science Boy
promfort 2 years ago
Ricky, the 'deadly' VA radiation belts are composed mostly of low energy Alpha particles.
Dangerous due to their high density but dense because they are magnetically contained. They are composed of two main sections which are truncated toroidal in shape, and relatively thin.
Provided that a craft does not remain for any length of time in the most dense regions, an acceptable and minimally dangerous exposure level is easily achieved.
Rob260259 2 years ago
Keep your delusions....
And continue to ignore the 'other' radiation which would have killed them as well.
I wasn't expecting anything more. As usual you deliver mediocrity and minumilizations!
Bravo Bobby!
un4g1v3n1 2 years ago
pt1
Two trips through the VAB's would have subjected the dosimeter/astronauts to levels amazing missing from that displayed by NASA's Apollo records. Van Allens geiger counters pegged out....Even while shielded by lead. Let's not minimilize the dangers of the VAB Scott...According to Plait, they have to shut down the electronics on the Hubble, when it makes the quick transit through the SAA.
un4g1v3n1 2 years ago
Why don't you just ignore all the other space radiation hazards, and keep the focus on just the VAB, so you can quote a time article that tries to deny the dangers, with a supposed quote from Van Allen in complete opposition to his own, peer-reviewed scientific proof that unmanned missions would be the only safe way to transit the belts until appropriate shielding was developed. The same shielding that has yet to be developed to this day. A simple radiation shielding search will confirm that.
un4g1v3n1 2 years ago
James Van Allen rebutted the claims that radiation levels were too dangerous for the Apollo missions in 1971 in a paper presented to that year's IAC.
Dosimeters carried by the crews showed they received about the same cumulative dosage as a chest X-ray or about 1 milligray. Plait cited an average dose of less than 1 rem, which is equivalent to the ambient radiation received by living at sea level for three years.
Furthermore, electronics and human bodies are very different beasts.
scotthatton44 2 years ago
Dosimeters carried by the crews showed they received about the same cumulative dosage as a chest X-ray or about 1 milligray.
chest X-rays last how long? They were in space, surrounded by ISOTROPIC GCR's, constant solar wind, and extra blasts from solar flares, MAJOR solar flares, lunar, and craft secondary radiation for DAYS.
KNOWING that, and then trying to sell one chest X-ray worth of exposure, makes you one of the most purposefully ignorant, or delusional fools on the planet!
un4g1v3n1 2 years ago
Apollo 17 was the longest Moon mission and latest 12 days.
Valeri Polyakov was onboard Mir for 437 days. He is still alive and well.
Mir was continually manned from September 1989 until August 1999, a span of 3644 days. Most of the cosmonauts onboard spent longer than the 12 days that Apollo 17 spent in space. Nearly all are still alive. None of these cosmonauts, to my knowledge, have died of space-induced cancer.
scotthatton44 2 years ago
Mir is well within the comfort zone provided by the magnetosphere...You SHOULD know that!
It is not assaulted by constant solar wind, solar flare, and ISOTROPIC GCR's. And obviously they wouldn't be affected by the secondary craft, and lunar radiation!
Use applicable bullshit excuses there Scott!
So the excuse is rather lame...Now, don't you think?
un4g1v3n1 2 years ago
Evaluating shielding effectiveness for reducing space radiation cancer risks
Francis A. Cucinottaa, Myung-Hee Y. Kimb, Lei Renc
For short-stay lunar missions, solar particle events (SPE). present the most significant risk, however one that is mitigated effectively by shielding, especially for carbon composites structures with high hydrogen content. In contrast, for long duration lunar or Mars missions, GCR risks may exceed radiation risk limits that are based on acceptable levels of risk.
scotthatton44 2 years ago
I have posted the biomedical report relating to Apollo as a link on the front page on this channel (see under "Recent Activity")
iafastro 2 years ago
Thanks for the link Iafastro. I wonder which of the 26 moonhoax conspiracy believers is first to shout "NASA report, it's all FAKE!"
Rob260259 2 years ago 2
While you aren't at it there Scott, why don't you visit NOAA and the CFI list for major solar flares during Apollo missions.
OR just watch, if you lack the required ability to learn for yourself, by looking deeper than Apollogist web sites.
watch?v=T1ltWMbHdD
Do you know anything about Gamma Ray Bursts?
Are you aware that there are several hundred million solar particles, in every square inch of space, EVERY second.
Do you understand how the magnetosphere works?
LEARN!
un4g1v3n1 2 years ago
In answer to these questions posed: yes, yes and yes.
scotthatton44 2 years ago
If your answer is yes to those questions...Then how can you possibly buy Apollo anymore. Are you that weak you cannot admit you were fooled? Is your ego in control of your mind, or your brain? Because your brain, SHOULD be able to smell the skunk that was Apollo!
un4g1v3n1 2 years ago
Seems there is another Dutch victim of the petrified moonwood around Ricky. Ofcourse your pal Strawfag will say that it's one my other 'sockpuppet' nicks, but nevermind.
For the 84th time: do you really think you are smarter than 40 years and several generations worth of radiation experts?
Rob260259 2 years ago
Every time I see you use straw's name in such a way, the more I'm convinced you are Svector, or an even worse homophobic troll!
What exactly is your problem Rob? Mommy didn't spank you, and teach you respect?
un4g1v3n1 2 years ago
Speaking of respect, un4g1v3n1. It would be really nice if you treated the other users of this channel with some, rather than name calling and insults...
iafastro 2 years ago 8
Hey, iafastro, thanks for posting these! You have the best videos!
Andybucker 2 years ago
@iafastro Wow....Kettle..you are black...LOL.....
Pay attention to the stylings of your favorite apollogists to see how ironic your statment is here!!!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
No, I am not Svector Ricky. I laugh about this 'conviction' of you guys. I am not Entropy, Delahaye, Thirdclass, Krisdevalle, BlisterHiker, LindaStevens, Shanedk, FractalD, BagFullOfP, Snakehip, SecretSquare, LunarTuner, Endlessdream, Mainframe, AbelMagwitch, Jcgmed, CusterApollo, Airbuzz, Charliegoodboy, Pjwarez, SpreadingtheMuse, Guitarplayer4real either, to name a random few.
And I have no problem. However... I have a lot of free time.
Rob260259 2 years ago
@un4g1v3n1
"It would be really nice if you treated the other users of this channel with some, rather than name calling and insults..."
Nevermind Iafastro. You are dealing with one of the attackdogs of WhiteJarrah, the no.1 hoaxhead of the Moonhoaxconspiracists.
Rob260259 1 year ago
Too bad about the video camera.
curea229 2 years ago
Great video! Thanks for posting.
paulsnyder 2 years ago
Dear All,
I have some questions about sociology and culture:
(1) Why do we have a preception that aerospace is closely related to America?
(2) Is that because Amercans' culture of freedom?
(3) How does aerospace advancement related to "American Dream"?
I would guess that aerospace is closely related to Americans' values including hard working, creative, bravery to chanllenge, determination, freedom, and liberty.
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE for your creative ideas and brainstorm!!! :)
applesweeter 2 years ago
If NASA really did fake the wholw moon thing why risk doing it 5 times?
You have alot more chance of being caught as oppose to the once on apollo 11 then wrapping up the moon program.
Also if it was fake i'm sure the Russians would have known about it and would have gladly let the world know of America cheating.
markyballack 2 years ago 19
@markyballack 7 times- 11-17
blaixx992 1 year ago
@markyballack Why let everybody know, when they could try it themselves?
RivardMatthew 1 year ago
Go, Pete! A legend. RIP
CharitableView 2 years ago
lol
hhalano 2 years ago
Comment removed
immapwner 2 years ago
At least there was more than a semblance of constructive endeavour in 1969 with the Apollo program up to and including Apollo 12. Today's space exploration seems to be about those stupid, senile old dickheads actually murdering tens of millions of dollars on a space trip, lasting a few hours, into near Earth orbit, and they convince themselves they've achieved something incredibly special. Talk about not having a life, or needing to get a life! But: Bravo Gordon, Bean, and Conrad! Three greats!
Richardhedditch261 2 years ago
Okay, so dont get me involved in the whole conspiracy theory debate thats plagued this comments page but sometimes I feel that man didnt have the complete know-how or technology to safely go to the moon and back in 1969! And now we're not even sure we can make it to the moon by 2020. The only thing that would really be convincing is if I could peer through a telescope and see some of the remaining equipment and the flag with my own eyes. No offence to anyone
Ahmad1982 2 years ago
So why did NASA stop all lunar exploration missions (manned)? Thats my question, we could have learned so much if they continued going every two years. Also, I'm surprised why the Soviet Union didnt make it up there first. They were way ahead of the US in space and propulsion.
Ahmad1982 2 years ago
It is a matter of very public record that NASA would have LOVED to continue exploring the moon. Congress slashed the budget after public interest waned and other issues were deemed more important. Really, it is no secret. Money drives all this. Money will drive how soon we return. It is not (and hasn't been) a matter of know-how but of budget and priorities.
grayhog86 2 years ago 5
One of the coolest things about the Apollo 12 mission was the fact that they landed close (512 feet) from Surveyor 3, the unmanned soft-landing probe that was sent to the moon 2.5 years before that mission. They brought back the TV camera and other pieces of Surveyor which are now on display at the Smithsonian.
Synthetrix 2 years ago
how is it that one generation can achieve something as incredible as landing a man on the moon and all that the next can achieve is deny that it ever happened, this generation couldnt land a cow pat on a manure pile. I blame liberalism its created a generation of semi-literate retards
harmonicj 2 years ago
I think that's part of it. The kids from my generation did not have car seats, helmets for riding their bikes and a host of other things that today's PC world thinks are so necessary. It seems to me that we are raising weak, wussies these days who will never have the balls, grit and determination to accomplish what the men of the Apollo program did. One can only hope that those great achievements will inspire the youth of today.
Synthetrix 2 years ago
"I blame liberalism its created a generation of semi-literate retards"
Interestingly, that sentence is semi-literate.
The idea that liberalism generates public stupidity is baffling, and suggests you don't really know what liberalism is. Conservatism, meanwhile, with its brainiac figureheads like George W Bush and Sarah Palin, keeps churning out those genii who don't believe in climate change and think the Earth is 6000 years old.
Who enabled the Apollo program, anyway? JFK and LBJ.
fifiragdoll 2 years ago
my dad is best friends with allen bean the 3rd man to walk on the moon
fantden12 2 years ago
A detailed picture of the lunar surface w/ an arrow pointing at what looks like another rock. Real proof NASA was there! LOL!
hhalano 2 years ago
what i was saying was the lunar module landed on the surface, not a shuttle, and the rocket launched them from earth.
Josh420sk8er 2 years ago
Go to nasa's youtube profile, simply type in nasa and search, then click on there profile pic, once there look under where it says report profile image violation, click the tab that says nasa history, click the tab that says lro sees apollo landing sites, scroll down a little bit and there ya go. pictures of the Lm's
Josh420sk8er 2 years ago
great video and well done BRAVO
kelli7767 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
What a joke!
'You may fool all the people some of the time; you can even fool some of the people all the time; but you can't fool all the people all the time'. (Abe Lincoln)
It is time for America to admit the moon landings were faked.... and at least attempt to regain what little credibility she has left.
Yes they went into space...but not out to the moon and back... Not even Space Shuttle can do that...
Gee the NASA guys are real funny!
Ha ha ha
yaluobud 2 years ago
Not even space shuttle can do that? Are you serious? The shuttle was not designed for going to the moon. I think its time for folks like you to speak out more so we all can get a good laugh at you.
timinhayner 2 years ago
You have no idea what you are talking about, yaluobud, haven't you? - Not even Space Shuttle can do that. OMG.
BubeslaaB 2 years ago
Escaping Earth's gravity is the biggest hurdle ... Once you are up there you could go any where you wanted... including out to the moon and back... (DID I SAY SHUTTLE COULD LAND ON IT ... No! So shut the fuck up)
It seem the biggest hurdle ithe world has to face is the over zealous patriotism of dumb ars Yanks.
yaluobud 2 years ago
BubeslaaB,
OMG ... and you are a space physicist?
the moon is 384,000 km away, Space Shuttle has only flown to a height of 611 km above earth.... Those van Allen Radiation belts which start at 1000 km above earth sort of fuck up any story about flying out to the moon in 1969...
Ha ha ha ha ha Dipshit
yaluobud 2 years ago
This is not to dispute that passage through the Van Allen belts would be dangerous. But NASA conducted a series of experiments designed to investigate the nature of the Van Allen belts, culminating in the repeated traversal of the Southern Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly (an intense, low-hanging patch of Van Allen belt) by the Gemini 10 astronauts.
Synthetrix 2 years ago
While such drastic measures are needed to shield against intense, high-frequency electromagnetic radiation, that is not the nature of the radiation in the Van Allen belts. In fact, because the Van Allen belts are composed of high-energy protons and high-energy electrons, metal shielding is actually counterproductive because of the Bremsstrahlung that would be induced.
Synthetrix 2 years ago
your right, a space shuttle didnt go to the moon and back, a lunar module did that part lol, the shuttle just launched them into space. We did make it to the moon, powerful telescopes prove that we did, also the man made objects that are up there. If we didnt make it there, how did those get there? weird huh? You might wanna brush up on your facts a little before making stupid comments like that...sorry to say.
Josh420sk8er 2 years ago
There is not one photograph in existance taken by a powerful telescope to prove that there is a luna module on the moon... Find the proof stupid dickwad!
Maybe you should brush up on your own facts!
yaluobud 2 years ago
Thats because no telescope has the resolving power to capture small details like that on the moon's surface. The LRO however HAS returned many photos in the last week of all the Apollo landing sites, confirming what sane people have known for 40 years. 12 men landed on the moon over 6 missions.
Synthetrix 2 years ago
Gripping - "Yahooo! This baby is really going!" Great sound track Houston - please confirm your choice....
dartmoorguide 2 years ago 2
haha LRO apollo pics has proved u cts wrong and rightly so,if it went for the apollo program you would not even have a microwave to cook your dinner what you stuff into your gob while typing such purile utter nonsense,jelous little punks
cripplewoox 2 years ago
Too bad we can look and see the landing sites plus the footprints where the astronauts walked.
discolando 2 years ago 2
lepxze są gwiezdne jaja
Cris99169 2 years ago
In the series From Earth to The Moon, we see the APollo 12 astronauts removing the video camera from the lunar module, after they found the other camera, that was to be put on a stand on the lunar surface, was broked. Why there is jo video from the lunar module videocamera after they remove it ?
jerryaltman 2 years ago
jerry, they only brought one TV camera at a time (at least on the first missions). I'm not sure what From Earth To The Moon has. Are you sure it wasn't a film camera rather than a TV camera?
ImTheSecretSquare 2 years ago
It's show two astronauts removing one camera from the exterior lunar module. They used a tool to cut out the scrsws to be able to take off the camera.
I will search the video on youtube again. I think was a spanish idiom translated from the series.
jerryaltman 2 years ago
Yeah, if it's bolted onto the outside of the lunar module, it's definitely one of the 16-mm Maurer film cameras.
ImTheSecretSquare 2 years ago
Type on youtube: De la Tierra a la Luna - Ep 7.
I think part 4 of this episode show they removing the exterior camera of the lunar module.
jerryaltman 2 years ago
I just watched it. They were removing the camera from Surveyor, not the LEM.
boulderdsvo 2 years ago
I take a look again, and you are very right. They were land very close to the Surveyor. A very precise landing.
jerryaltman 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what a stupid mother fuckers with they are lie brain washing the hole nation, first of all they never ever been close to the moon,and even if they ever have them stupid assholes they been to the dark side of the moon where there is no light its closer for us to reach the surface of it that's just a fuckin lie like they claim that Jesus is god and the trinity fuckin brain washed dog's
alizai99 2 years ago
Very good narration, perfect sound track! Thank you iafastro.
DCS66 2 years ago
it sounds like they have a sonar :)
Terminator4004 2 years ago
Comment removed
ShillBasher 2 years ago
I try not to get involved in the Fake/Non Fake debates on the channel but I'd like to answer this one since nobody has.
My answer would be to try it for yourself - wait for a dark night, take a photo of something in the foreground and see if you see stars on your photo.
Indeed if the moon missions were faked, the presence of stars would have been all wrong had they added them. It would mean that they were closer to the subject than light years away - it's a depth of field/f stop thing.
iafastro 2 years ago
Thanks for reply, iastro, you make some good points. I'll give the night shot thing a try and let you know how I fare.
It does sound as though you've looked at both sides of the story, very sensible, and have yet to come to a conclusion either way. I am undecided about the Apollo moon landings. For many reasons I believe that they may have been faked but at the same time I still think it is possible that it wasn't. The moon surface laser reflectors are a tricky one to answer if we didn't go.
ShillBasher 2 years ago