PEOPLE!!! FOR CRYING OUT LOUD!! I KNOW IT ISN'T FROM THE WHITE ALBUM, OR AS RARE AS I THOUGHT...did you not see the annotation i put in? Think before you type, please!
this has absolutely noththing to do with the beatles. its a song from pauls second soloalbum "mccartney, and i think liers should be tortured to to death. lie about the beatles? some people has no shame, no dignity.
@ThePellepennan This video is from 2007....i was sixteen then...I got the facts wrong, okay? or did you not notice the GIANT ANNOTATION covering the intro stating that I was misinformed? I didn't "Lie" at all.
@beatles123 you guys! this song is from the FIRST Paul's solo album; McCartney, released in april 1970, but Paul was working on it when they were still together. You can "have it" as a beatles song as well , since it is was included in Anthology 3 in the 90's.
@ThePellepennan Actually, the Beatles were still together when Paul wrote this. They recorded a demo, but never released it. After they broke up, Paul released it on McCartney.
@ThePellepennan Paul wrote this while in Rishikesh with the Maharishi; this version was recorded in late May of 1968 at George's house in Esher, part of a large batch of demos the band did immediately before heading into EMI Abbey Road studios to record the "White Album".....so, yeah, it's got quite a lot to do with the Beatles.
If it's in the Anthology, then it's not so rare now, is it. It wasn't just George, it was the other 2 Beatles too. I like this version better than Paul's realesed version.
I do not understand the music press of the 70s and 80s.... Boy, were they wrong...
I like punk, I love hiphop, I'm totally into all kinds of metal, even death.... BUT
Silly Love Songs is my favourite song ever!
I'm sorry it's not cool, mr Reporter of a Cool Magazine....If you don't get the true genius of McCartney, you shouldn't be calling yourself a connaisseur of populair art.....
Or wait.... Maybe you should, cus you're al dumbin'.... dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb dumbdum dumbdumb
I'm sure this is rare. but I hear Linda singing backup. There is version of this with the Beatles. They also did a version of Teddy Boy. I think this is from Paul's house during the recording of the McCartney album.
MAN you just can't say hey! I've got a rare version of junk! Because this has lready been releasond on the official anhtology which has sold over 15 000 OOO copies!!
what he taught, which was not heard of before in the western world until that time. peaceful revolution against the roman occupation. with love, be kind to your oppressors. we can all find all the terrible things religion has done: 9/11, the crusades, etc... point is: look for the good. there are many humble, unassuming people doing following his teaching (i.e. mother thersea, et al.). its not about religion, its about a relationship with my creator thats important. following my gut/my God.
@Pickininvt an MA in bullshit? it takes many years of being an addict to get one of those... read the comments prior to the one's i made to see what i was talking about. don't half-measure it (which i assume is a usual custom) and only read the top few and never finish anything... in life...
he was the most influential person to walk the earth, and his teaching are simple. Constantine defied him at the edict of milan around 320, great move on his part, saved the empire another 100 years because a civil war would have erupted between the pagans and this new christian religion. the point is this: his teachings were to love one another and to be a good person. period. what humans did in his name after him is unimportant. what he said is. its not about religion and dogma, its about
i cant believe i signed in to write this, i must be really bored. i have a Masters in Mediterranean history from Cambridge, not that that makes me better or more informed than anyone else on the subject but the fact remains i did study the time period for the greater portion of my adult life. that being said: a) there is plenty of evidence Jesus did in fact walk the Earth 2000 years ago, so there is no argument there. b) whether you believe he is the son of God or not is irrelevant...
Rare indeed...only owned by the millions and millions of people who purchased anthology 3...also, thanks for the extra time at the front to confuse people it was actually a longer Beatles version. Well done!
I have on dvd a rare coy but damaged footage of Paul trying to sing All Things Must Pass with George. It doesn't sound good, he didn't understand what George was trying to convey. And on the same footage from the time they were making Let It Be Yoko screaming/screetching to Beatle music, I can't believe they let her drone on like that. It made my ears bleed.
Don't worry beatles 123, there's never a shortage of clowns to get upset about the use of 'rare' when describing Beatles outtakes. Whatever gets them thru the night . . .
It most certainly is rare or difficult to find on YouTube as I could not find it yesterday when I searched for "The Beatles Junk" - or a combination thereof. It is #7 on Anthol 3 CD1. This is The BBCs Radio2s Sounds Of The 60s Beatles A to Z song for week starting SAT 14AUG10 where the history of this song is given about 40 mins into the prog. This can be heard online for 1week only by going to the prog site. It was recorded at George's house.Thanks for posting.
@NomadRepublic Hahahah funny!! :D I always play with the same misheard lyric even though I know it says Jubilee!!! Broken hearted jew... Believe!!!
On another subject, I have no idea why this song didn't make it to the album, it's an absolute beauty. It was the time I think when John started getting all funny about Paul being another Englebert Humperdink, or a Sentimental Crooner, or any of the nasty stuff he labelled him with that he didn't seem to mind before. My guess is he was simply tired.
Not only is that harmony dubbed by McCartney (no Harrison here) but this is in crap quality and the intro is longer than John Lennon's beard... Plus, this "rare" song was in 96's charts for a few weeks -.-
Its as if the lyrics are already finished and he hears them his head but can't quite make them out. Listen how "Buy, buy says the sign in the shop window" comes into focus over the three choruses.
i think the problem is that being a slut is what's selling now, but we have to keep the hope, good musicians are still being born or practicing waiting to be heard in the future
I'm 20. How i wish i could go the music store and find new worthy stuff. I can't. Find a new band with good music is very rare. Just ladys gagas and rappers out there. THANKS GOD there are many jewels from the past like this one.
I believe McCartney released the 'McCartney' LP before the final Beatles recordings were done... there are also Beatles anthology recordings of Paul doing Teddy Boy in the studio with the others./
This is just the version from the Beatles Anthology 3. I wouldn't say it's rare. I would, however, say that the audio quality of this upload version is shit.
@MarkToTheSky I'm french, maybe i'm not understand your post , but "Paul is the shit"?
WTF ? Is the Musician of the XIX "siècle",
Great man, great voice, talent, vegetarian.
Paul is just better than jesus, like the Beatles. So listen the beatles with Macca, or don't listen beatles (just take it, or leave it (Strockes Ahah:))
@StampsGuys "is the shit" is a phrase often used in America to mean that the subject in question exceeds the highest standards set forth. If one enjoyed eating chocolate cake, they may say, "Chocolate cake is the shit!"
@MyDreamside seeing as tho Paul is an actual person and is clearly visible yes he is better then jesus, mainly because no one has ever seen jesus and there for it is an unsubstantiated and lazy way for explaining human existence.
i may have taken what you said out of context but are you comparing meat to a car?
@MyDreamside Jesus never exist... it's just a idiot story to take our brain... but some millions of stupid believe in this superstitions... Thounsend years under stupidity, pain, terror and affraid of the hell or heaven... stupid humanity ...
@MyDreamside ¿history? that it's not history it's a myth in fact... It's nothing write about so "important person", VIP that you call Jesus. There does not exist anything written in any Roman document of the epoch. And logically after so great event it should be normal that one was speaking about a man who passed three years doing miracles and facing the government of Pilatos and Herod up to dying crucified ... not?
@MyDreamside There is no an alone truth in this book of myths called " the new Testament", because logically it does not seek to tell the truth if not to cheat the ignoramuses and superstitious inhabitants of the planet of those times... The incomprehensible thing is that in 21st century they continue existing these superstitions that so much I damage have provoked the humanity between holy wars, tortures and murders in name of this false god...
@Brannruz i dont want to go into this, there are people who dont believe in jesus preaching that's ok but it's stupid to believe that there was no jesus,jesus existed you may dont believe he was son of the god but there is no way that jesus never existed
@MyDreamside Also is no reference in Roman documents on the children's slaughter that supposedly Herod carried out to murder to so called " King of the Jews " when the magicians Melchor, Gaspar and Baltasar came to Palestine. The deceitful stories that are reported in the book of the myths " New Testament " speak about thousands of innocent children murdered by the army of Herod...
@Banaziow96 Dude, I love the Beatles man. My comment was a compliment, I was in no way insulting this music, I do in fact make music, and everything I make, it's all inspired from growing up listening to the beatles.
I'm 43 been a fan since i was about 14, I love the Beatles, but I am able to separate the artist from the art. You see the inability to do that today in the Michael Jackson fan. To any person who has a basic understanding of psychology it's easy to deduce that the man was a pedophile, but don't try to reason that to his fans. Inability to separate art from artist.
I can't believe this song is by Paul! I first heard it on a movie called "Hanging up". And was bothered by the song for months, but I didn't look it up. Then I heard it on the radio just this morning ["Breakfast with The Beatles" portion]. Paul is the best!
Paul was an intelligent person can follow a project full of musical talent that you have to think it was by the beatles jhon have lasted much less paul imposed discipline and commitment really talented mimic a big question mark paul i love
McCartney brought the honey and Lennon the vinegar. Together they created music that has stood the test of time. Forget the acrimonious relationships and personal bs. Just enjoy the music.
Paul liked the popularity, but John not so much. John was all about reality, and later condemned the Beatles as fake and meaningless; but really, I enjoyed more the fantasy aspect of the Beatles, the "myth" as John said, and I now realize it was Paul's idea, or encouragement of it. People WANT something to believe in, and he emulated that.
Actually Lennon lived in a myth, Talking about Peace and Love while beating his wife and pretending Julian didn't exist. Left- minded people are like this generally, they involve them selves with macro self righteous intent to avoid their inner pain and lack of empathy for those close to them. What he despised about Mccartney was what he couldn't be, and really deep down wanted to be.
And so now we have the classic Indians and cowboys, good guy bad guy. This is all created by the media that is Left-Minded also. So now we're set up, hate McCartney( shallow,materialistic, egotistical) love Lennon( Macro intent- love, peace, utopia) Of course this is not true but we've been conditioned to believe it.
The real truth is that in the end what he criticized Paul for "he writes silly love songs" is what he ended up becoming before he passed away, " starting over" " woman" but he gets a pass by the critics.
starts at 1:06
xXBrainDancerXx 1 month ago
with the new youtube, why dont you just change the title of the video, edit out the beginning description, and remove the annotations?
789TheBeatles 2 months ago
sounds like LInda to me
mcrtnyfan 3 months ago
This is about as rare as oxygen.
edwardLRS 3 months ago
@edwardLRS hahahahaha
EricDymond 3 months ago
PEOPLE!!! FOR CRYING OUT LOUD!! I KNOW IT ISN'T FROM THE WHITE ALBUM, OR AS RARE AS I THOUGHT...did you not see the annotation i put in? Think before you type, please!
beatles123 3 months ago
that's not george harmonizing with him. it's john.
boomer3505 3 months ago
this song brings tears to my eyes for some reason....not sure why
fluffheadify 4 months ago
DOUCHEBAG
busteroo7 5 months ago
@ThePellepennan Just shut up and go crawl back in to that hole you came from, dumbshit.
SketchUp707 5 months ago
this has absolutely noththing to do with the beatles. its a song from pauls second soloalbum "mccartney, and i think liers should be tortured to to death. lie about the beatles? some people has no shame, no dignity.
ThePellepennan 6 months ago
@ThePellepennan This video is from 2007....i was sixteen then...I got the facts wrong, okay? or did you not notice the GIANT ANNOTATION covering the intro stating that I was misinformed? I didn't "Lie" at all.
beatles123 5 months ago 7
@beatles123 you guys! this song is from the FIRST Paul's solo album; McCartney, released in april 1970, but Paul was working on it when they were still together. You can "have it" as a beatles song as well , since it is was included in Anthology 3 in the 90's.
edsoncapuchosilva 5 months ago
@ThePellepennan bitch.
danny9519 5 months ago
@ThePellepennan Actually, the Beatles were still together when Paul wrote this. They recorded a demo, but never released it. After they broke up, Paul released it on McCartney.
superacecombat 4 months ago
@ThePellepennan Paul wrote this while in Rishikesh with the Maharishi; this version was recorded in late May of 1968 at George's house in Esher, part of a large batch of demos the band did immediately before heading into EMI Abbey Road studios to record the "White Album".....so, yeah, it's got quite a lot to do with the Beatles.
DrVonChilla 3 months ago
@ThePellepennan I think some people has no grammar.
minihama 3 months ago
this isnt rare is the slightest, ever heard of anthology 3?
grahamm2709 6 months ago 7
If it's in the Anthology, then it's not so rare now, is it. It wasn't just George, it was the other 2 Beatles too. I like this version better than Paul's realesed version.
John37816 7 months ago
I do not understand the music press of the 70s and 80s.... Boy, were they wrong...
I like punk, I love hiphop, I'm totally into all kinds of metal, even death.... BUT
Silly Love Songs is my favourite song ever!
I'm sorry it's not cool, mr Reporter of a Cool Magazine....If you don't get the true genius of McCartney, you shouldn't be calling yourself a connaisseur of populair art.....
Or wait.... Maybe you should, cus you're al dumbin'.... dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb dumbdum dumbdumb
remoheck 7 months ago
There is a much higher quality version of this demo and it's not THAT rare..
CanKuman8 7 months ago
I want to be a musician and/or actress and Paul McCartney and Charlie Chaplin are my main inspirations!
itsbridgetlogann 7 months ago
I'm sure this is rare. but I hear Linda singing backup. There is version of this with the Beatles. They also did a version of Teddy Boy. I think this is from Paul's house during the recording of the McCartney album.
keifer50 7 months ago
MAN you just can't say hey! I've got a rare version of junk! Because this has lready been releasond on the official anhtology which has sold over 15 000 OOO copies!!
M3town33 8 months ago
32 people are idiots and 255 people are genius
BDBmusic 8 months ago
paul marry me :< you are so perfect
whoooahi 8 months ago
what he taught, which was not heard of before in the western world until that time. peaceful revolution against the roman occupation. with love, be kind to your oppressors. we can all find all the terrible things religion has done: 9/11, the crusades, etc... point is: look for the good. there are many humble, unassuming people doing following his teaching (i.e. mother thersea, et al.). its not about religion, its about a relationship with my creator thats important. following my gut/my God.
ex227 9 months ago
@ex227 What in the fuck do your comments have to do with this song? I have a Masters in bullshit, and you have topped me.
Pickininvt 8 months ago
@Pickininvt an MA in bullshit? it takes many years of being an addict to get one of those... read the comments prior to the one's i made to see what i was talking about. don't half-measure it (which i assume is a usual custom) and only read the top few and never finish anything... in life...
ex227 7 months ago
he was the most influential person to walk the earth, and his teaching are simple. Constantine defied him at the edict of milan around 320, great move on his part, saved the empire another 100 years because a civil war would have erupted between the pagans and this new christian religion. the point is this: his teachings were to love one another and to be a good person. period. what humans did in his name after him is unimportant. what he said is. its not about religion and dogma, its about
ex227 9 months ago
i cant believe i signed in to write this, i must be really bored. i have a Masters in Mediterranean history from Cambridge, not that that makes me better or more informed than anyone else on the subject but the fact remains i did study the time period for the greater portion of my adult life. that being said: a) there is plenty of evidence Jesus did in fact walk the Earth 2000 years ago, so there is no argument there. b) whether you believe he is the son of God or not is irrelevant...
ex227 9 months ago
Comment removed
ex227 9 months ago
Paul McCartney is the best spokesperson for junk
aidan1912 9 months ago
theres a Beatles version called "Singalong Junk" as well as a Beatles version of "Junk" on the Anthologies.
QueenBeatlesWings 10 months ago
This is everything but junk.
Grupo02 10 months ago
Que fotos (ou pinturas) feios, parecem q estão inchados rsrs
TalmaLennon 11 months ago
this isnt rare, they did alot of takes for this song during the Get Back sessions.
Rush1013 11 months ago
WHAT A PUTZ!!!
hughilene 11 months ago
WHAT A PUTZ!!!
hughilene 11 months ago
Rare indeed...only owned by the millions and millions of people who purchased anthology 3...also, thanks for the extra time at the front to confuse people it was actually a longer Beatles version. Well done!
Derby14 11 months ago
this is not Esher Version where is George??
Calaitafan 1 year ago
This is a beautifully crafted song which is, I think, hugely underrated.
Kaalec 1 year ago
u said it was rare because it is 2 youtube. bunch of crap u said it was rare 2 get more views
duncansby96 1 year ago
The song smells.
Prsnhoot 1 year ago
Oh my love.xxx
micocat1 1 year ago
Nicw
NatWolff43567890 1 year ago
from anthology 3
Mrtobyjanssen 1 year ago
can someone tell me on what album is this song?
deezswallow 1 year ago
@deezswallow 'McCartney', his first solo album, released in 1970 i think.
isacpf 1 year ago
@deezswallow PAuls first solo McCartney.
shakedownstreet48 1 year ago
@shakedownstreet48 yestarday!?!
MrNumNums087 1 year ago
@deezswallow THIS version is actually on Anthology number three
johnlennon616 1 year ago
So much feeling with one guitar!
mjazzguitar 1 year ago
sentimental and very sad song
hwanj 1 year ago
I have on dvd a rare coy but damaged footage of Paul trying to sing All Things Must Pass with George. It doesn't sound good, he didn't understand what George was trying to convey. And on the same footage from the time they were making Let It Be Yoko screaming/screetching to Beatle music, I can't believe they let her drone on like that. It made my ears bleed.
LAwoman1956 1 year ago
It's not that rare, it's on anthology. But I'm sure someone has pointed that out by now. lol
JohnPaulSaylor 1 year ago
la concha d tu madre un minuto diciendo estupideces...
elcapodeescalada 1 year ago
Don't worry beatles 123, there's never a shortage of clowns to get upset about the use of 'rare' when describing Beatles outtakes. Whatever gets them thru the night . . .
stalkek 1 year ago
It most certainly is rare or difficult to find on YouTube as I could not find it yesterday when I searched for "The Beatles Junk" - or a combination thereof. It is #7 on Anthol 3 CD1. This is The BBCs Radio2s Sounds Of The 60s Beatles A to Z song for week starting SAT 14AUG10 where the history of this song is given about 40 mins into the prog. This can be heard online for 1week only by going to the prog site. It was recorded at George's house.Thanks for posting.
RickmalR 1 year ago
It's not rare. It's on Anthology. Great tune though.
BLACKNBLUECOMEDY 1 year ago
Broken-hearted jew?
NomadRepublic 1 year ago
@NomadRepublic it's not broken-hearted jew, it's broken-hearted jubilee. Defenition: 1. a time or season for rejoicing
2. a special anniversary, esp a 25th or 50th one. (I think he's lamenting a day that should be happy with a party but isn't.)
Tsarevna303 1 year ago
@Tsarevna303 Ahahaha...I was just kidding, my dear. I'm very familiar with the song. Just being a wise ass. :~)
NomadRepublic 1 year ago
@NomadRepublic That's what I thought it was at first too, before I heard the "-bilee"
JetBlack327 1 year ago
@NomadRepublic Hahahah funny!! :D I always play with the same misheard lyric even though I know it says Jubilee!!! Broken hearted jew... Believe!!!
On another subject, I have no idea why this song didn't make it to the album, it's an absolute beauty. It was the time I think when John started getting all funny about Paul being another Englebert Humperdink, or a Sentimental Crooner, or any of the nasty stuff he labelled him with that he didn't seem to mind before. My guess is he was simply tired.
CuteMcBeauty 1 year ago
The melody is just divine. They really had the power of bringing already beautiful songs to the studio.
menoziinrevoltado 1 year ago
waste an entire minute with stupid dialogue, why dontcha
onetthome 1 year ago
it's just on Anthology 3!!
JesseReith1 1 year ago
Not only is that harmony dubbed by McCartney (no Harrison here) but this is in crap quality and the intro is longer than John Lennon's beard... Plus, this "rare" song was in 96's charts for a few weeks -.-
Iktofed 1 year ago 3
En esta version, se puede apreciar la maravillosa voz de Paul, cómo armoniza y vibra al unísono con los instrumentos. Es genial
katebaderlis 1 year ago
great harrison track!
MrIzzyRuiz 1 year ago
this isnt that rare it was on the beatles anthology :)
neonHEARTSbitches 1 year ago
@neonHEARTSbitches you're right!
JesseReith1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
esta es la originaaal !!! no es rareee -.-
lol suckeeer!
beatlesmusica 1 year ago
esta es la originaaal !!! no es rareee -.-
lol suckeeer!
beatlesmusica 1 year ago
what a cute song
miellie1 1 year ago
This is Paul, not George.
775987mb 1 year ago
@775987mb No shit we got it already!
Dirschbag 1 year ago
fucking great song. im flamming
Lucas11B 1 year ago
1:07 i have a shirt with those pics on it^^
willygilly101 1 year ago
I like this version better than the official one, just 'cause this one sounds more powerful and intimate, and just much more beautiful.
shikiku 1 year ago
Beautiful. Simply beautiful.
shikiku 1 year ago
sounds like 'mother natures son'
crazziejoe 1 year ago
Any chance you could make your "blue screen" notes 12 to 17 minutes longer?
septip123 1 year ago 38
This isn't rare, Apple sold millions of Anthology 3 CDs and this is on it. It's probably at your local Best Buy as you read this.
Cledus2000 1 year ago 16
Isn't that Paul and Lennon?
theoldertwin22 1 year ago
junk and singalong junk are indeed on the mccartney album. great song.
bluntforce86 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Junk enough said
ToySoldier2007 2 years ago
It's not on Ram. It's on McCartney.
jlopen 2 years ago
Its as if the lyrics are already finished and he hears them his head but can't quite make them out. Listen how "Buy, buy says the sign in the shop window" comes into focus over the three choruses.
tigrepants 2 years ago
not george, its linda singing. its a womans voice. could have been a great song finished properly kh
harck1 2 years ago
Paul DID finish this song "Junk" it's on Paul's album "Ram" (but its not played with the Bealtes of course)
4FabBEATLES 2 years ago
@harck1 It actually is finished, just not with the Beatles. It's on Paul's solo album McCartney
madelinealexander22 1 year ago
Wonderful. Such an exquisite song, delicate. How could it come from gazing upon ...junk? What an unlikely inspiration as they say.
Can you make the intro a bit longer? Only kidding!!
alanhll1 2 years ago
Not so rare, it's on Anthology 3.
DrownedByTheStone 2 years ago
@DrownedByTheStone
My thoughts exactly. Since when is the Beatles Anthology rare??
DinoDude65 2 years ago
So when are they going to start cloning Paul then? LoL We need his musical genius to live on long after he's gone!
he11kat 2 years ago 3
@he11kat how do you know he hasn't been cloned already o.o?
vaultboyrr 2 years ago 2
@he11kat sorry it was thumb up u__u my mistake
TakiVeracruz 2 years ago
Paul is the greatest singer \ song writer that ever lived.
LookingRU 2 years ago 27
i think the problem is that being a slut is what's selling now, but we have to keep the hope, good musicians are still being born or practicing waiting to be heard in the future
Nacho0507 2 years ago 2
i know im only 13 and i think the same way! that should give them a hint to find some more bands like the beatles!
chickbob724 2 years ago 2
I'm 20. How i wish i could go the music store and find new worthy stuff. I can't. Find a new band with good music is very rare. Just ladys gagas and rappers out there. THANKS GOD there are many jewels from the past like this one.
whoispink 2 years ago 6
check out dr. dog. great sound
shaaazaam 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
A friend of mine really likes those guys, I'm not to impressed with them though.
SchwagmasterJT 2 years ago
simply beatiful, i cannot believe many of my generation dont appreciate this
Frankybobhun1 2 years ago 9
Im not sure what you mean, the bealtes still have a large grasp on popular culture.
bigshoes123321 2 years ago
yes but a lot pf kids dont apreciate them
Frankybobhun1 2 years ago
Sure, but they all take it the wrong way. And people seem to think it's paying respect when they make crapy cover versions for commercials.
NintenDudeProduction 2 years ago 2
that's because no big beat, super loud bass and the singer doesn't dance when singing, and let us not forget the bling costume.
timeomyside 2 years ago
love the 90 minute build up to something that is massivly available at ANY record store in the world.
septip123 2 years ago 3
this isnt rare
vaporfarts 2 years ago 9
I believe McCartney released the 'McCartney' LP before the final Beatles recordings were done... there are also Beatles anthology recordings of Paul doing Teddy Boy in the studio with the others./
workstrength 2 years ago
WHYYOUDOTHAT IS SO PLENTY RIGHT
rix7 2 years ago
This is just the version from the Beatles Anthology 3. I wouldn't say it's rare. I would, however, say that the audio quality of this upload version is shit.
whyyoudodat923 2 years ago 11
You have done us all a favor - good for you beatles123.
Keith
keithantill 2 years ago
please lower your volume if it's too loud...genius.
trevtar 2 years ago 42
There is something magical about hearing Beatles outtakes, and rehersals.
PearlJammer07 2 years ago 13
"Buy, buy" says the sign in the shop window
"Why, why?" says the junk in the yard.
Every once in a while, Mac could write a decent lyric.
subg88 2 years ago 6
Paul Mccartney is legend, his lyrics are genuine and original, without him, there would be nothing worth listening to today. Without any of the four.
I'm not being all rowdy, but honestly, Paul is the shit.
MarkToTheSky 2 years ago 60
@MarkToTheSky SORRY MAN, BUT THE SHIT IS YOU CAUSE YOU WOUL LIKE TO BE AT LEAST THE SOLE OF HIS SHOE AND AM SORRY BY MY SELF FOR SPENDING THIS TIME
clonerman2010 1 year ago
@MarkToTheSky I'm french, maybe i'm not understand your post , but "Paul is the shit"?
WTF ? Is the Musician of the XIX "siècle",
Great man, great voice, talent, vegetarian.
Paul is just better than jesus, like the Beatles. So listen the beatles with Macca, or don't listen beatles (just take it, or leave it (Strockes Ahah:))
StampsGuys 11 months ago
@StampsGuys In american english "x is the shit!" = "x is the best!"....
sometimes I don't get american english... -_-
Grupo02 11 months ago
@StampsGuys "is the shit" is a phrase often used in America to mean that the subject in question exceeds the highest standards set forth. If one enjoyed eating chocolate cake, they may say, "Chocolate cake is the shit!"
deeplogic 11 months ago
@StampsGuys saying paul is better than jesus is like you are saying meat is better than car,nonsense!
MyDreamside 10 months ago
@MyDreamside seeing as tho Paul is an actual person and is clearly visible yes he is better then jesus, mainly because no one has ever seen jesus and there for it is an unsubstantiated and lazy way for explaining human existence.
i may have taken what you said out of context but are you comparing meat to a car?
Saffire192 10 months ago
@Saffire192 jesus was a real person!And many people saw him.You may dont believe his preaching but he is a real historical person.
MyDreamside 10 months ago
@MyDreamside maybe he was, but i highly doubt he was any different to the rest of us.
Saffire192 10 months ago
@MyDreamside Jesus never exist... it's just a idiot story to take our brain... but some millions of stupid believe in this superstitions... Thounsend years under stupidity, pain, terror and affraid of the hell or heaven... stupid humanity ...
Brannruz 9 months ago
@Brannruz learn history because you probably dont know a thing
MyDreamside 9 months ago
@MyDreamside ¿history? that it's not history it's a myth in fact... It's nothing write about so "important person", VIP that you call Jesus. There does not exist anything written in any Roman document of the epoch. And logically after so great event it should be normal that one was speaking about a man who passed three years doing miracles and facing the government of Pilatos and Herod up to dying crucified ... not?
Brannruz 9 months ago
@MyDreamside There is no an alone truth in this book of myths called " the new Testament", because logically it does not seek to tell the truth if not to cheat the ignoramuses and superstitious inhabitants of the planet of those times... The incomprehensible thing is that in 21st century they continue existing these superstitions that so much I damage have provoked the humanity between holy wars, tortures and murders in name of this false god...
Brannruz 9 months ago
@Brannruz i dont want to go into this, there are people who dont believe in jesus preaching that's ok but it's stupid to believe that there was no jesus,jesus existed you may dont believe he was son of the god but there is no way that jesus never existed
MyDreamside 9 months ago
@MyDreamside Also is no reference in Roman documents on the children's slaughter that supposedly Herod carried out to murder to so called " King of the Jews " when the magicians Melchor, Gaspar and Baltasar came to Palestine. The deceitful stories that are reported in the book of the myths " New Testament " speak about thousands of innocent children murdered by the army of Herod...
Brannruz 9 months ago
@MarkToTheSky Don't you like these musics?
So you understand got to your music world it's lost.
The music it's this and nothing else.
I'm brazilian and have pride for to like The Beatles.
But you? Is happy for to like Justin Bieber or Lady Gaga?
You is lost too, with your musics.
If you want, some day can like Beatles too...
Is only know what is music!
Banaziow96 10 months ago
@Banaziow96 Dude, I love the Beatles man. My comment was a compliment, I was in no way insulting this music, I do in fact make music, and everything I make, it's all inspired from growing up listening to the beatles.
MarkToTheSky 10 months ago
@MarkToTheSky So sorry.
Like i say, I'm brazilian and maybe not understand your comment.
(My english it's little).
Banaziow96 10 months ago
seriously just reupload the damn thing without the JUNK introduction
Bastardozer 2 years ago 7
haha yea that intro was a bit tedious.
MrFjkas 2 years ago 3
no offence but this is from anthology 3
kanzosupremo 2 years ago 2
i really don't like looking at fake pictures of the beatles...ugh!
Beatlebug60 2 years ago
Dude, you suck making videos. I don't want to read your bullshit for a minute before the music starts
funktapus 2 years ago
love it!
lutieah 2 years ago 2
ok guys, 'Couple things:
I know this is just paul now.
i know it isnt rare really, but i ment, rare for youtube.
and as for the comentarry, just skip it, you can skip it without waiting on it to buffer--its sort of a glitch.
please, just enjoy it for what it is. ^^
beatles123 2 years ago
@beatles123 Ha, i thought the same thing. Is it really rare when you can go to the store and buy the anthology?
Freezinghot2 1 year ago
Comment removed
j2eeguru 2 years ago
okltsply - the Beatles aren't for you.
j2eeguru 2 years ago
I'm 43 been a fan since i was about 14, I love the Beatles, but I am able to separate the artist from the art. You see the inability to do that today in the Michael Jackson fan. To any person who has a basic understanding of psychology it's easy to deduce that the man was a pedophile, but don't try to reason that to his fans. Inability to separate art from artist.
okltsply 2 years ago 4
So this song is what makes Paul better than John? OOOOOOOOOOK.
irishman05050505 2 years ago
i take that back, there are subtle diff in this version
jayrtheking 2 years ago
def on the anthology, not that rare. a great version nonetheless
jayrtheking 2 years ago
this isn't rare. it's on the anthology cd..vol 3 i think.
Beatles4President 2 years ago
is this george or paul
quinitin 2 years ago
george is in this demo!
bassistamistico 2 years ago
I can't believe this song is by Paul! I first heard it on a movie called "Hanging up". And was bothered by the song for months, but I didn't look it up. Then I heard it on the radio just this morning ["Breakfast with The Beatles" portion]. Paul is the best!
agnusdei11 2 years ago 3
That is Linda his first wife singing in the background.I do not believe that any of the other Beatles were involved in this version.
akbill2 2 years ago
thank you.
spiderdragon1969 2 years ago
this version is beautiful......is one of the best paul's perfonmance....evrytime I cry with this song....thank you paul....
TheCicciu94 2 years ago 4
Paul was an intelligent person can follow a project full of musical talent that you have to think it was by the beatles jhon have lasted much less paul imposed discipline and commitment really talented mimic a big question mark paul i love
96Nacho69 2 years ago
george is not on this demo.
kohut11 2 years ago
What a voice Paul has. He could be so sweet and could still belt it out. Great singer.
Paulmancieri67 2 years ago 2
paullllllllllll!!!
gastom 2 years ago
lennon was out of touch, kinda of started retreating into his art school student ideals
Paul is just a lover at heart who can write a tune
together they were magic
saladays182 2 years ago
George isn't singing on this. Paul double tracked his vocal and I think he's doing ALL the guitar work as well.
jaredgetsacookie 2 years ago
McCartney brought the honey and Lennon the vinegar. Together they created music that has stood the test of time. Forget the acrimonious relationships and personal bs. Just enjoy the music.
GTOMako 2 years ago 5
You are completly correct!!!
jorgerodz69 2 years ago
Paul liked the popularity, but John not so much. John was all about reality, and later condemned the Beatles as fake and meaningless; but really, I enjoyed more the fantasy aspect of the Beatles, the "myth" as John said, and I now realize it was Paul's idea, or encouragement of it. People WANT something to believe in, and he emulated that.
Yoshi5020 2 years ago
Actually Lennon lived in a myth, Talking about Peace and Love while beating his wife and pretending Julian didn't exist. Left- minded people are like this generally, they involve them selves with macro self righteous intent to avoid their inner pain and lack of empathy for those close to them. What he despised about Mccartney was what he couldn't be, and really deep down wanted to be.
okltsply 2 years ago 3
And so now we have the classic Indians and cowboys, good guy bad guy. This is all created by the media that is Left-Minded also. So now we're set up, hate McCartney( shallow,materialistic, egotistical) love Lennon( Macro intent- love, peace, utopia) Of course this is not true but we've been conditioned to believe it.
okltsply 2 years ago 2
The real truth is that in the end what he criticized Paul for "he writes silly love songs" is what he ended up becoming before he passed away, " starting over" " woman" but he gets a pass by the critics.
okltsply 2 years ago
o boy... you got it all figured out. is god real btw? j/w
airnsmke 2 years ago