you'll say "OMG, another one with crazy theories" je je ... They just let the lunatics go on..From time to time, people need to remember that "they need protection". The CIA knew, but "shit happens". The attack was allowed to "discipline the amerikan citizen" and, incidentally, obtain some contracts in oil and war industry.... plain and simple. There is no doubt that the USA government came out strong in its nationalist crusade, "disciplining" opponents of the Middle East policy.
@aleu650 your entire comment is speculitive based on what the conspiracy theory movement told you, you and them have absolutly no proof or evidence of your claims.
@loosechangeexposed Well, my story is so crazy? tell me, why you trust in the government so much?, not the first time they lie. Osama and Al Qaeda, that's the official story, or not? Osama was a former ally as well as Saddam. Anyway "the truth is the first casualty of war" and we may never know the whole truth, just saddens me that so many people died for nothing in USA and Irak, Pakistan etc. No matter the religion or language, the common people just want peace, bread and work.
@aleu650 i believe what i saw that day and the evidence that followed not just what other people say, the following videos are in my uploads and explain things about 9/11 using facts, proof and evidence.
"how the towers fell" "WTC 7 the hidden truth" "exposing the 9/11 truth" "sept 11th the smoking gun" "9/11 engines down elevator shafts" "loose change answer number 118 with witness" "flight 175 extra equipment" "flight 11 flash on north tower" "9/11 fires were starved for oxygen"
To be honest, and this is coming from doubter such as myself, i think what these Truthers are focussing on is the fact that silverstein bought this gigantic insurance claim 6 weeks before 9/11. Once again, bad timing. And, to be fair, Larry did go after more money because he claimed that each plane was its own seperate terrorist attack. He of course doesnt get his 8.8 billion or whatever he was after, but the fact of the matter is, his agents probably did the best thing: they paid for what he s
@ObeyMyBottle he didn't only buy insurance at that time that is when he signed the lease on the twin towers he insured the towers on the same day he signed the lease because that is what you do with any property, try and drive off a car lot with a financed car without insurance, the law states leased property must be insured to protect all parties, each was a seperate act, so were flight 93 and the pentagon.
@ObeyMyBottle It doesnt matter when he bought the insurance. It was a REQUIREMENT due to the WTC being a constant target of terrorism. Remember they were attacked in 93. It's not odd they would require insurance to cover a terrorist attack.The owners wanted to protect themselves so it was in the contract not a consipracy. Most 9-11 conspiracy believers don't even know Silverstein didnt own the towers. The Port Authority owned them.
Hey buddy. Feel free to send your videos as a video response to any of mine. It may help them be seen more. And in turn bury these lil truther fags even deeper. LOL
He had to get terrorist attack Insurrance because the twin towers have been bombed before. In the basement. Again,it was muslim terrorists. The same group actually. Silverstein signed the lease,and bought the ins. on the same day. As he was required to,by law!
@MrSavagerocks the info i read said he would be able to rebuild in the event of total destruction, there was nothing specific that said anything about terrorism.
@loosechangeexposed Did you see the link on my page my friend? The hyper link has much unseen evidence that jihadis did 911. Every time I post or show the link,truthers run for the hills. The truthers are just in denial. They are trying to put up a smoke screen so they themselves don't have to accept reality. The reality that muslims did 911. And not some crazy sect. Just average everyday muslims.
If you think Silverstein is the ONLY link connecting Israel to 9/11, think again: Google: "Israel did 9/11 all the proof in the world"; "Solving 9/11 - The deception that changed the world"; "Hundreds of Mossad agents caught running wild in America"; "Dual Citizen ship - Loyal to whom?"; On YT: "Alan Sabrosky 100% sure Israel - Rogue US gov did 9/11"; "Former CIA Officer - Israel controls US gov't" AND "Ex US Marine-9/11 was Mossad False Flag Op".
@CRschralper people say it was isreal because they are not connected to muslems, it is an attempt to make it look like the hijackers were staged to further try and make it look like an inside job. you are telling me to google something so specific that will bring me to a certain article, the places you are telling me to look are just like all who claim inside job, it's the same propaganda. all you have is hearsay, rumors, speculations, and opinions. not evidence.
i unlike you have evidence of the truth movement lying and covering up the evidence that exposes the truth, here is a video exposing one of them and explaining how every website hides the same info. /watch?v=E1FTx-PhW_s
the place to find the full audio is a link in the discription of the video.
go to any truther website that has the written transcript of the cheif palmer audio and not one of them will have the other firefighter. they are covering up.
Sure, people like Dr. Alan Sabrosky, 10yr. marine corps veteran & former director of studies at the US Army War College is just spreading "rumors" to make Israel look bad. LMAO. You Zionist bootlickers are SO sure it was "rogue Arabs" yet when presented evidence directly contradicting that, you won't even LOOK much less respond/refute it. As hate filled as you clowns are, one would think you'd JUMP at the chance to school us "truthers". Fact is, you're ALL bark...no bite.
@CRschralper if there was proof of that we would have went to war with isreal, not terrorists in afgan and iraq, if the gov't had proof of it being isreal they would have presented it to the world, either way you thinking it was isreal shows that you don't believe in inside job because isreal is a foriegn government.
you just need to do more research, to see that the evidence speaks for itself.
This is such crap and inaccurate. Larry Silverstien didn't just buy an insurance policy at the time in question, the allegation is that he doubled the insurance that he already had! He also sued his insurance company for double the policy amount claiming there was "two acts of terror". What did Larry receive after 9/11? $4. 5 Billion. Blow harder..."5. 33 BILLLLION $'S"
@RCPCTermite the attacks were 4 seperate incidents, and did you google the deal that Larry signed? he got insurance on the same day he signed the lease, his policy covered a pay out of 3.55 billion for any major loss, he recieved 3.55 bil for one hit and half of the 2nd one 1.78 bil for a total of 5.33 bil. that is what the insurance co. paid him, if it was an inside job they would have dug up something so they wouldn't have to pay, so you lie when you say he doubled his policy it was a new one.
@loosechangeexposed You conveniently FORGOT to mention the he insured specifically AGAINST terrorist attacks, and if the insurance company were to investigate, then they would expose 911 for the inside job that it was, you incredibly naive fuckers!
Gee, you forgot to claim that Lucky Larry saying "pull it", meant for the firemen to evacuate...like he has the authority to do that!
And what did he say IMMEDIATELY after he said pull it? "and then we watched the building collapse"!
@Bongofury361 i can tell you didn't do your own research by looking up the (publically known) insurance policy, it never said specifically against terror attacks, that is something you got from the truther movement, further proof that all you base your claims on is hearsay, rumors, speculations, and opinions.
the policy states that he had the right to rebuild in the event of any disaster, such as earthquake, tsunami, it never mentioned terrorism. you grasp at straws.
in this video, your saying that the "Truthers" are accusing him and having his property insured?? that's silly!!! btw isn't Larry Silverstein Leaseholder and therefore make him more of a tenant than the actual owner of WTC Complex? and is that your voice in this video?
@TheMostAwesomeMan242 truthers are trying to make him look guilty of a crime just because he got insurance on the same day he signed the lease, trying to make it look like he insured the proprerty so he could cash in, when the law states that the leaseholder must get insurance incase anything happens, truthers are trying to make it look like he got the insurance because he knew it was going to happen.
Good job man. i can really appreciate your intent to defend the truth, but on the same token arguing with a truther will bring you the same result as arguing with religious nuts. Those idiots are so deluded reason and logic don't work. They would rather stick to a incredible story with no evidence at all then just accept the truth. Well, if change a few deluded minds,(I have my doubts) that will already be something.
@nononsenseinrational one reason i debate these idiots is when they see i can not be shut down i know it gets to them, i look at it this way, because they will never admit they are wrong i want them to understand their thinking can not prove me wrong, i really don't care if they ever admit it, i'm just enjoying that i am really getting to them and they feel helpless against me. another reason i do it is so anyone reading comments can see the side truthers will never tell. the truth.
@loosechangeexposed I sometimes have fun arguing with brainwash nuts, they get so overwhelmed so quickly! Last nigth somebody was telling me about the coming end of the world, priceless. The world is filled with moron, and I, just like you, enjoy exposing them to their own stupidity. Religious nuts, truthers, doomsday prophets, Lunar landing denyers, most conspiracy theorist are the laughing stock of humanity, migth as well put them to good use!
@nononsenseinrational the thing is truthers had to make the claim of conspiracy before any of us needed to debate and debunk them, many of their followers had been hearing their side for years, some can't admit to the people around them they were fooled so they keep up the agenda, some hate the government so much they need it to be true, the ones who wrote books and made videos claiming inside job, know they will have to donate the money they made to the victims when they admit the truth.
@loosechangeexposed I care very deeply for the truth. I would take a harsh truth over a lie but on the same token I would rather not know than have a false knowledge. That is where the truther go wrong, they persist in false truth and true lie. Most human are not smart enough to develop critical thinking anyways, so they drift into delusions. Somebody needs to do the thinking for them, so bad some choose Alex Jones to process their information.
did you watch the conspiracy road trip ? on bbc3 a few days ago, its on the iplayer, dunno if its availabl in the us though, worth a watch, bt i still think ur banging ur head against a brick wall trying to convince conspiritards :)
@paranorma1palace i'll look 4 it, i like watching videos of both sides so i can learn what is being said about the debates of 9/11 then i research what i didn't know to find the truth, i researched the claims of planted explosives and found the only evidence is what other people were saying, there has never been evidence of explosives found, it's all hearsay.
i love when truthers debate me, when they find out i have a more logical answers to their claims it has them bangin their heads.
actually, the insurance company would not only have been able to get all the money paid out back, but the insurance companies for the Verizon Building, Deutsche Bank Building, and every other building in the area that was damaged would ALSO had a claim against Silverstein... If you extrapolate it to the logical conclusion, it gets a bit insane.
@dangerouslytalented when you put it that way every insurance company involved in paying any claim connected to the attacks such as life insurance on every victim, yet of the many insurance companies involved you would think at least one would have said let's investigate, if there was evidence of inside job they would have found it so they could sue for their money back. insurance investigators don't believe it was an inside job.
*SCOFF* YOUR LOGIC MEANS NOTHING TO ME BECAUSE I LISTEN TO ALEX JONES! THE GLOBALISTS TRICKED YOU INTO USING YOUR BRAIN RATHER THAN JUST GET YOUR INFO FROM TALK RADIO AND CHEESY DOCUMENTARIES! WAKE UP SHEEPOLE, I'M BEING LIED TO!
@machwon if you listen to alex jones and believe him you should watch the videos i made about him where i catch him in lies. also check out my video "sept 11th the smoking gun" where i expose loose change in a cover up.
@loosechangeexposed I'd rather listen to a kid with a nail carving letters into a blackboard than listen to alex jone or any twoofer. I think you missed the sarcasm in my comment, but I can't blame you for the downright retarded shit they say regularly. I'm not a retard. I know 9/11 was an outside job done by al-Queda. Keep up the good work.
@machwon your comment about "CHEESY DOCUMENTARIES" showed your sarcasm, but i answered you in a way that a truther that read your comment would disagree with me and take your side in an attempt to show he thinks he agrees with the truth, point is they are so confused they don't know what side to take.
you'll say "OMG, another one with crazy theories" je je ... They just let the lunatics go on..From time to time, people need to remember that "they need protection". The CIA knew, but "shit happens". The attack was allowed to "discipline the amerikan citizen" and, incidentally, obtain some contracts in oil and war industry.... plain and simple. There is no doubt that the USA government came out strong in its nationalist crusade, "disciplining" opponents of the Middle East policy.
aleu650 2 weeks ago
@aleu650 your entire comment is speculitive based on what the conspiracy theory movement told you, you and them have absolutly no proof or evidence of your claims.
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
@loosechangeexposed Well, my story is so crazy? tell me, why you trust in the government so much?, not the first time they lie. Osama and Al Qaeda, that's the official story, or not? Osama was a former ally as well as Saddam. Anyway "the truth is the first casualty of war" and we may never know the whole truth, just saddens me that so many people died for nothing in USA and Irak, Pakistan etc. No matter the religion or language, the common people just want peace, bread and work.
aleu650 1 week ago
@aleu650 i believe what i saw that day and the evidence that followed not just what other people say, the following videos are in my uploads and explain things about 9/11 using facts, proof and evidence.
"how the towers fell" "WTC 7 the hidden truth" "exposing the 9/11 truth" "sept 11th the smoking gun" "9/11 engines down elevator shafts" "loose change answer number 118 with witness" "flight 175 extra equipment" "flight 11 flash on north tower" "9/11 fires were starved for oxygen"
loosechangeexposed 4 days ago
To be honest, and this is coming from doubter such as myself, i think what these Truthers are focussing on is the fact that silverstein bought this gigantic insurance claim 6 weeks before 9/11. Once again, bad timing. And, to be fair, Larry did go after more money because he claimed that each plane was its own seperate terrorist attack. He of course doesnt get his 8.8 billion or whatever he was after, but the fact of the matter is, his agents probably did the best thing: they paid for what he s
ObeyMyBottle 2 months ago
@ObeyMyBottle he didn't only buy insurance at that time that is when he signed the lease on the twin towers he insured the towers on the same day he signed the lease because that is what you do with any property, try and drive off a car lot with a financed car without insurance, the law states leased property must be insured to protect all parties, each was a seperate act, so were flight 93 and the pentagon.
loosechangeexposed 2 months ago
@ObeyMyBottle It doesnt matter when he bought the insurance. It was a REQUIREMENT due to the WTC being a constant target of terrorism. Remember they were attacked in 93. It's not odd they would require insurance to cover a terrorist attack.The owners wanted to protect themselves so it was in the contract not a consipracy. Most 9-11 conspiracy believers don't even know Silverstein didnt own the towers. The Port Authority owned them.
Kyles45Angel 4 weeks ago
Hey buddy. Feel free to send your videos as a video response to any of mine. It may help them be seen more. And in turn bury these lil truther fags even deeper. LOL
MrSavagerocks 3 months ago
He had to get terrorist attack Insurrance because the twin towers have been bombed before. In the basement. Again,it was muslim terrorists. The same group actually. Silverstein signed the lease,and bought the ins. on the same day. As he was required to,by law!
MrSavagerocks 3 months ago
@MrSavagerocks the info i read said he would be able to rebuild in the event of total destruction, there was nothing specific that said anything about terrorism.
where can i find the info you found?
loosechangeexposed 3 months ago
@loosechangeexposed All High risk targets are treated as"high risk" h t t p://w w w.911myths.com/html/wtc_insurance.html
MrSavagerocks 3 months ago
@loosechangeexposed Did you see the link on my page my friend? The hyper link has much unseen evidence that jihadis did 911. Every time I post or show the link,truthers run for the hills. The truthers are just in denial. They are trying to put up a smoke screen so they themselves don't have to accept reality. The reality that muslims did 911. And not some crazy sect. Just average everyday muslims.
MrSavagerocks 3 months ago
If you think Silverstein is the ONLY link connecting Israel to 9/11, think again: Google: "Israel did 9/11 all the proof in the world"; "Solving 9/11 - The deception that changed the world"; "Hundreds of Mossad agents caught running wild in America"; "Dual Citizen ship - Loyal to whom?"; On YT: "Alan Sabrosky 100% sure Israel - Rogue US gov did 9/11"; "Former CIA Officer - Israel controls US gov't" AND "Ex US Marine-9/11 was Mossad False Flag Op".
Pooof...and now you're awake.
CRschralper 3 months ago
@CRschralper people say it was isreal because they are not connected to muslems, it is an attempt to make it look like the hijackers were staged to further try and make it look like an inside job. you are telling me to google something so specific that will bring me to a certain article, the places you are telling me to look are just like all who claim inside job, it's the same propaganda. all you have is hearsay, rumors, speculations, and opinions. not evidence.
cont next posy
loosechangeexposed 3 months ago
@loosechangeexposed cont from prev post.
i unlike you have evidence of the truth movement lying and covering up the evidence that exposes the truth, here is a video exposing one of them and explaining how every website hides the same info. /watch?v=E1FTx-PhW_s
the place to find the full audio is a link in the discription of the video.
go to any truther website that has the written transcript of the cheif palmer audio and not one of them will have the other firefighter. they are covering up.
loosechangeexposed 3 months ago
@loosechangeexposed
Sure, people like Dr. Alan Sabrosky, 10yr. marine corps veteran & former director of studies at the US Army War College is just spreading "rumors" to make Israel look bad. LMAO. You Zionist bootlickers are SO sure it was "rogue Arabs" yet when presented evidence directly contradicting that, you won't even LOOK much less respond/refute it. As hate filled as you clowns are, one would think you'd JUMP at the chance to school us "truthers". Fact is, you're ALL bark...no bite.
CRschralper 3 months ago
@CRschralper if there was proof of that we would have went to war with isreal, not terrorists in afgan and iraq, if the gov't had proof of it being isreal they would have presented it to the world, either way you thinking it was isreal shows that you don't believe in inside job because isreal is a foriegn government.
you just need to do more research, to see that the evidence speaks for itself.
loosechangeexposed 3 months ago
You sound like a monster
MG30001 3 months ago
@MG30001 are you afraid?
loosechangeexposed 3 months ago
This is such crap and inaccurate. Larry Silverstien didn't just buy an insurance policy at the time in question, the allegation is that he doubled the insurance that he already had! He also sued his insurance company for double the policy amount claiming there was "two acts of terror". What did Larry receive after 9/11? $4. 5 Billion. Blow harder..."5. 33 BILLLLION $'S"
RCPCTermite 4 months ago
@RCPCTermite the attacks were 4 seperate incidents, and did you google the deal that Larry signed? he got insurance on the same day he signed the lease, his policy covered a pay out of 3.55 billion for any major loss, he recieved 3.55 bil for one hit and half of the 2nd one 1.78 bil for a total of 5.33 bil. that is what the insurance co. paid him, if it was an inside job they would have dug up something so they wouldn't have to pay, so you lie when you say he doubled his policy it was a new one.
loosechangeexposed 4 months ago
@loosechangeexposed You conveniently FORGOT to mention the he insured specifically AGAINST terrorist attacks, and if the insurance company were to investigate, then they would expose 911 for the inside job that it was, you incredibly naive fuckers!
Gee, you forgot to claim that Lucky Larry saying "pull it", meant for the firemen to evacuate...like he has the authority to do that!
And what did he say IMMEDIATELY after he said pull it? "and then we watched the building collapse"!
Fucking jokers!
Bongofury361 4 months ago
@Bongofury361 i can tell you didn't do your own research by looking up the (publically known) insurance policy, it never said specifically against terror attacks, that is something you got from the truther movement, further proof that all you base your claims on is hearsay, rumors, speculations, and opinions.
the policy states that he had the right to rebuild in the event of any disaster, such as earthquake, tsunami, it never mentioned terrorism. you grasp at straws.
loosechangeexposed 4 months ago
in this video, your saying that the "Truthers" are accusing him and having his property insured?? that's silly!!! btw isn't Larry Silverstein Leaseholder and therefore make him more of a tenant than the actual owner of WTC Complex? and is that your voice in this video?
TheMostAwesomeMan242 4 months ago
@TheMostAwesomeMan242 truthers are trying to make him look guilty of a crime just because he got insurance on the same day he signed the lease, trying to make it look like he insured the proprerty so he could cash in, when the law states that the leaseholder must get insurance incase anything happens, truthers are trying to make it look like he got the insurance because he knew it was going to happen.
loosechangeexposed 4 months ago
@loosechangeexposed oh okay.
TheMostAwesomeMan242 4 months ago
Good job man. i can really appreciate your intent to defend the truth, but on the same token arguing with a truther will bring you the same result as arguing with religious nuts. Those idiots are so deluded reason and logic don't work. They would rather stick to a incredible story with no evidence at all then just accept the truth. Well, if change a few deluded minds,(I have my doubts) that will already be something.
nononsenseinrational 4 months ago
@nononsenseinrational one reason i debate these idiots is when they see i can not be shut down i know it gets to them, i look at it this way, because they will never admit they are wrong i want them to understand their thinking can not prove me wrong, i really don't care if they ever admit it, i'm just enjoying that i am really getting to them and they feel helpless against me. another reason i do it is so anyone reading comments can see the side truthers will never tell. the truth.
loosechangeexposed 4 months ago
@loosechangeexposed I sometimes have fun arguing with brainwash nuts, they get so overwhelmed so quickly! Last nigth somebody was telling me about the coming end of the world, priceless. The world is filled with moron, and I, just like you, enjoy exposing them to their own stupidity. Religious nuts, truthers, doomsday prophets, Lunar landing denyers, most conspiracy theorist are the laughing stock of humanity, migth as well put them to good use!
nononsenseinrational 4 months ago
@nononsenseinrational the thing is truthers had to make the claim of conspiracy before any of us needed to debate and debunk them, many of their followers had been hearing their side for years, some can't admit to the people around them they were fooled so they keep up the agenda, some hate the government so much they need it to be true, the ones who wrote books and made videos claiming inside job, know they will have to donate the money they made to the victims when they admit the truth.
loosechangeexposed 4 months ago
@loosechangeexposed I care very deeply for the truth. I would take a harsh truth over a lie but on the same token I would rather not know than have a false knowledge. That is where the truther go wrong, they persist in false truth and true lie. Most human are not smart enough to develop critical thinking anyways, so they drift into delusions. Somebody needs to do the thinking for them, so bad some choose Alex Jones to process their information.
nononsenseinrational 4 months ago
LOVE your accent! Queens?
NonnyMus1 4 months ago
@NonnyMus1 suffolk county but close.
loosechangeexposed 4 months ago
@loosechangeexposed : ) That must be why I was uncertain! Thanks for the video!
NonnyMus1 4 months ago
did you watch the conspiracy road trip ? on bbc3 a few days ago, its on the iplayer, dunno if its availabl in the us though, worth a watch, bt i still think ur banging ur head against a brick wall trying to convince conspiritards :)
paranorma1palace 5 months ago
@paranorma1palace i'll look 4 it, i like watching videos of both sides so i can learn what is being said about the debates of 9/11 then i research what i didn't know to find the truth, i researched the claims of planted explosives and found the only evidence is what other people were saying, there has never been evidence of explosives found, it's all hearsay.
i love when truthers debate me, when they find out i have a more logical answers to their claims it has them bangin their heads.
loosechangeexposed 5 months ago
actually, the insurance company would not only have been able to get all the money paid out back, but the insurance companies for the Verizon Building, Deutsche Bank Building, and every other building in the area that was damaged would ALSO had a claim against Silverstein... If you extrapolate it to the logical conclusion, it gets a bit insane.
dangerouslytalented 5 months ago
@dangerouslytalented when you put it that way every insurance company involved in paying any claim connected to the attacks such as life insurance on every victim, yet of the many insurance companies involved you would think at least one would have said let's investigate, if there was evidence of inside job they would have found it so they could sue for their money back. insurance investigators don't believe it was an inside job.
loosechangeexposed 5 months ago
*SCOFF* YOUR LOGIC MEANS NOTHING TO ME BECAUSE I LISTEN TO ALEX JONES! THE GLOBALISTS TRICKED YOU INTO USING YOUR BRAIN RATHER THAN JUST GET YOUR INFO FROM TALK RADIO AND CHEESY DOCUMENTARIES! WAKE UP SHEEPOLE, I'M BEING LIED TO!
machwon 5 months ago
@machwon if you listen to alex jones and believe him you should watch the videos i made about him where i catch him in lies. also check out my video "sept 11th the smoking gun" where i expose loose change in a cover up.
loosechangeexposed 5 months ago
@loosechangeexposed I'd rather listen to a kid with a nail carving letters into a blackboard than listen to alex jone or any twoofer. I think you missed the sarcasm in my comment, but I can't blame you for the downright retarded shit they say regularly. I'm not a retard. I know 9/11 was an outside job done by al-Queda. Keep up the good work.
machwon 5 months ago
@machwon your comment about "CHEESY DOCUMENTARIES" showed your sarcasm, but i answered you in a way that a truther that read your comment would disagree with me and take your side in an attempt to show he thinks he agrees with the truth, point is they are so confused they don't know what side to take.
loosechangeexposed 5 months ago