Err... The spindle diameter of the cones starts at the fat bit and narrows down to the thin pointy bit. so overall, the cones actualy roll down hill even though the slope is slightly up hill. The spindle diameter gets smaller faster than the slope increases.
i cant unsderstand why so many people are confused by this... ill try to explain it to people simply...
if you were to have 2 flat edges which were not on a slope like this... and put the cone on it... it would move in a similar way to what the cone is here. Because gravity is pulling the cone down and the only way it can go down is if it gets to a point where it is lower. for it to be lower... the edges have to be further apart so that largest plane (the center) of the cone is lower down
there's no antigravity at all... I don't understand from where the idea come...misundesrtanding of physics laws...or not knowing them...ionic wind produces force...in vacuum lifter nearly doesn't have any thrust... I've built few by now, ionic wind can blow down a match... Newton's third law...
Assume this is a point contact. The center of mass lies directly with the two points of contact. The inclination in combination with the cone geometry give rise to the going up part. Gravity push the cone downward. So there is a point where they will be equal, as you saw it. Think about a stone up hill. Which way will it fall? Which ever way have a hold of it first. How strong will it go up? depends on the slope. This is a battle between cone geometry/incline vs. gravity/decline.
to put it in simple terms... the middle is pushing down but the sides are pushing up so it moves up the hill to the wider part because there is less force in the center and more on the edges right? then at the top there is more on the edges and it regains the balance of weight on the outside and rolls down regularly?
what if you were to put a drinking bird mechanism inside, not looking like a bird, but a curlicue pipe that circulates the liquid as it rolls, then the liquid uncirculates in that heat engine curlicue thing and rolls the widget back, where the cycle would start again?
I've built few lifters. You don't understand physics laws and express your ignorance. Lol. There are lot of them in the Internet, also in old books, de Seversky (he, if I remember well) got a patent...
Thats not anti gravity, its only visual effect. Is so easy to make this. Im making a real anti-G (electrodynamic) prototype. I will load in youtube when it will be finished. The electric propieties of air.
It's easy, there's a weight in the inside that's heavier than the outside container. The weight is suspended by rubber bands in the center of the cone, which is then wound inside the cone by simply spinning it. It naturally tries to unravel itself, but since the weight is heavier, the outside container spins instead of the weight. Just like a wind up toy except since there's no wheels so the outside container spins instead.
correct, it's an old science demo from a book I had about 35 years ago,you see to the cone it is rolling downhill due to the widening ramp and the cone's shape
the hows it ocming back up. . . . a rubber band stretched from apex to apex inside with a weight to allow gravity to affect it in the center, holding it steady, making it twist. that stores the energy from the downhill roll, giving it reverse roll to come back up and repeat the process. is that possible?
its not anti-gravity. it has to do with the angle of the box, the angles of the cone and the force of gravity pulling down on the cone being more than the angle of the box. but its still cool!!! good job!
is wrong. Gravity is a vectorial force and may be either attractive or repulsive. Google for ARC Seibersdorf (a ESA lab). However I agree, that the shown vid has nothing to do with antigravity. The V-shaped rail and the
everyone that says he has something wich produce antigravity the only thing it does is providing a couter force for gravity and not making it dissapear or not work on a certain object.
I think there is a much simpler and less technical explanation .The double cone is made from paper and someone is gently blowing it (with a straw )up the ramp .
eso es facil de demostrar, el cono por dentro tiene un objeto pesado que hace que gire al lado contrario por poco tiempo ya que por inercia se va deteniendo, nada magico hay alli
THIS IS THE DEVILS WORK... BURN IT lol
philyLewis 1 year ago 3
...how many cones to make my bed float inside my room?
LocoEvilDabdoub 1 year ago
Just off-center, internal weight, starting the "down turn" at the upgrade.
TheSdenne 2 years ago
Does that come with pizza?
mastersduhgree 2 years ago 4
anti-gravity? anyone that gets fooled by this is a complete idiot
devilsmonkey1 2 years ago
ehe)) didnt see any antigravity here
gfan83 2 years ago 2
Err... The spindle diameter of the cones starts at the fat bit and narrows down to the thin pointy bit. so overall, the cones actualy roll down hill even though the slope is slightly up hill. The spindle diameter gets smaller faster than the slope increases.
mrwidjet 2 years ago 13
i cant unsderstand why so many people are confused by this... ill try to explain it to people simply...
if you were to have 2 flat edges which were not on a slope like this... and put the cone on it... it would move in a similar way to what the cone is here. Because gravity is pulling the cone down and the only way it can go down is if it gets to a point where it is lower. for it to be lower... the edges have to be further apart so that largest plane (the center) of the cone is lower down
arrantate 3 years ago
it's called gravity, get over it....fools.
asianpower3 3 years ago 2
there's no antigravity at all... I don't understand from where the idea come...misundesrtanding of physics laws...or not knowing them...ionic wind produces force...in vacuum lifter nearly doesn't have any thrust... I've built few by now, ionic wind can blow down a match... Newton's third law...
kiesiu4 3 years ago
In saying, 'anti gravity' just means the opposite of gravity. Whether it's a scientifically applicable term is moot.
D0g63rt 3 years ago
it may have a weight and a rubber band inside
petrajohn2 3 years ago
vacuum cleaner you fools....
jonboygood1 3 years ago
Assume this is a point contact. The center of mass lies directly with the two points of contact. The inclination in combination with the cone geometry give rise to the going up part. Gravity push the cone downward. So there is a point where they will be equal, as you saw it. Think about a stone up hill. Which way will it fall? Which ever way have a hold of it first. How strong will it go up? depends on the slope. This is a battle between cone geometry/incline vs. gravity/decline.
vietarc 3 years ago 2
to put it in simple terms... the middle is pushing down but the sides are pushing up so it moves up the hill to the wider part because there is less force in the center and more on the edges right? then at the top there is more on the edges and it regains the balance of weight on the outside and rolls down regularly?
Taro550 3 years ago
what if you were to put a drinking bird mechanism inside, not looking like a bird, but a curlicue pipe that circulates the liquid as it rolls, then the liquid uncirculates in that heat engine curlicue thing and rolls the widget back, where the cycle would start again?
korgri 2 years ago
This is strictly a visual affect. Who ever you are stop playing with angles. Simple minds can not handle such things. lol
Markjason1977 3 years ago
I've built few lifters. You don't understand physics laws and express your ignorance. Lol. There are lot of them in the Internet, also in old books, de Seversky (he, if I remember well) got a patent...
kiesiu4 3 years ago
im guessing side A is arcing out and the side C is arcing in. the second thing probablt stayed on becuase the weight was in the center.
FutureScientistOfUSA 3 years ago
-
the center is pushed out like a dimond so the sides push the wheel
lance1283 3 years ago
Thats not anti gravity, its only visual effect. Is so easy to make this. Im making a real anti-G (electrodynamic) prototype. I will load in youtube when it will be finished. The electric propieties of air.
mailhoax 3 years ago 2
Lets build a car like that :D
And a piece of road of 20 KM
takkieman 3 years ago
that is so simple to do
wtfmate176 3 years ago
da it will do that.
jOeCoOL9111 3 years ago
hahah ya poor man there is a mass in it and the mouvment not normale there is one gravity in this earth
spiderman15000 3 years ago
wow!!!! hahaha
fullcontact89 3 years ago
hahaha waht is this sith??...noob,up the parkour!!!!
inaaaki 3 years ago
At first I did'nt see it , then during the slow motion replay it was suddenly incredible! =:o) LOL
ebmstudios 3 years ago
Cheap
Momokuchen 4 years ago
BUSTED!!!!
ThierryLouis 4 years ago
Thank you danielsusa, at least one intelligent person here who gives a correct explanation.
alemitoproductions 4 years ago
danielusa was right I retract my last statement
abcentminded1 4 years ago
It's easy, there's a weight in the inside that's heavier than the outside container. The weight is suspended by rubber bands in the center of the cone, which is then wound inside the cone by simply spinning it. It naturally tries to unravel itself, but since the weight is heavier, the outside container spins instead of the weight. Just like a wind up toy except since there's no wheels so the outside container spins instead.
abcentminded1 4 years ago
the double cone has weights in them so as soon as they stop they keep on rolling and go the other way
ride4pride 4 years ago
This is not anti-gravity you idiot its just MAGNETS
Odioloemo 4 years ago
WRONG!!
utedass1313 4 years ago
there is a little stone in it............
TheHiggleDude 4 years ago
Idiots, look at it the side is curved! The heaver cylinder had more inertia, more mass.
The cone was light, less mass, it could roll on the curve.
tesla1attack 4 years ago
lmao magnets??
better think twice before posting stupid stuff
pyromancer91 4 years ago
ur dumb. its the ramp getting wider and the cones spreads out too, so it moves
HereticFilm 4 years ago
correct, it's an old science demo from a book I had about 35 years ago,you see to the cone it is rolling downhill due to the widening ramp and the cone's shape
nedleyolpal 4 years ago
the hows it ocming back up. . . . a rubber band stretched from apex to apex inside with a weight to allow gravity to affect it in the center, holding it steady, making it twist. that stores the energy from the downhill roll, giving it reverse roll to come back up and repeat the process. is that possible?
dazm0 3 years ago
this has nothng to do with anti gravity, angle of the cone or the box, its whats insiide te cones.. ive made these with cans...
gamesx12 4 years ago
Fuck the einstein-like motherfuckers and the stupid explanations! This cone is cool!^^
charliesama763 4 years ago
I know it's not anti-gravity but I didn't create it. Tell your complaints to the designer. Links are on the side.
buddadude 4 years ago
its not anti-gravity. it has to do with the angle of the box, the angles of the cone and the force of gravity pulling down on the cone being more than the angle of the box. but its still cool!!! good job!
danielsusa 4 years ago 2
Hi There Sacha4you, can you give me an example of gravity as a repulsive force?
craigskyboard 4 years ago
Any area with negative pressure will have repulsive gravity.
loathi 4 years ago
Form physical point of view, your statement
is wrong. Gravity is a vectorial force and may be either attractive or repulsive. Google for ARC Seibersdorf (a ESA lab). However I agree, that the shown vid has nothing to do with antigravity. The V-shaped rail and the
double cone inverts the angle of plane.
sacha4you 4 years ago
I meant it doesnt exist in the way of:
everyone that says he has something wich produce antigravity the only thing it does is providing a couter force for gravity and not making it dissapear or not work on a certain object.
aarschgezicht 4 years ago
You are still wrong. Einstein predicted in GR
a coupling between electromagnetical and gravitational forces. The same prediction was
done in the (still incomplete) Heim theory.
An ESA lab (ARC Seibersdorf) wanted to verfy
these predictions and made 1996 a successful experimental setup to proove the gravito-magnetic London moment in a SC. Meanwhile,
the effect was replicated. Note: Podkletnov's
experiment could NOT be replicated yet.
(Google for +ARC +gravitomagnetic london moment)
sacha4you 4 years ago
wow I didnt know that!
thanks for shearing
aarschgezicht 4 years ago
You are welcome.
sacha4you 4 years ago
I think there is a much simpler and less technical explanation .The double cone is made from paper and someone is gently blowing it (with a straw )up the ramp .
PYTHAGORAS101 4 years ago 3
Even simpler...It has to do with the angle of the second cone. It wants to sit on a wider base
benner45 4 years ago 4
exactly benner45
haxhimergja 3 years ago
@benner45 simplest of all ... thing goes down but looks like going up
islandfireballkill 1 year ago
"This is not anti-gravity fucktard"
Hey theres no need for that
lol
Ok fine its not anit-gravity but its still cool
lanswipe 4 years ago
WTF?
casttoro 4 years ago
Better name would be "The Widening Gap Cone Roller"
Sorry, I don't find this 'incredible' at all.
AdminOnDuty 4 years ago
This is Electrohydrodynamics.
Not anti-gravity.
DoctorAwesome 4 years ago 2
Get a hot date at > WEBFLINGTODAY . COM <
arline44chatz 4 years ago
eso es facil de demostrar, el cono por dentro tiene un objeto pesado que hace que gire al lado contrario por poco tiempo ya que por inercia se va deteniendo, nada magico hay alli
EviLeonhart 4 years ago
Leonardo i can visit you (My Marcony institute!) i'm bordered with you...my name is Vito!
klemaks 4 years ago