@tnafguy It's not called a "star factory" It's called a stellar nursery. Nobody has seen a star form because it's a loooooooooooong ass process. But, if you understand gravity and fusion, I'ts easy to understand how they could form naturally without Jesus.
I used to believe that life evolved on earth, but the more likely explanation for life appearing so early in earths history was that it was brought here from space. It is easy to accept that, and makes sense when you consider that no lab in the world has successfully reproduced life using early earth conditions. Now the question remains, where DID complex reproducing life start? If not 5 billion years ago, then 10? 13? We only have about 13.7 billion years to work with here...
@Titantron9000 Nobody has produced life in the lab, but with early earth conditions they have produced amino-acids which are the building blocks of life. There is plenty of difficulties with the idea life arose on this planet, I agree, and I am also going with the extremophile theory myself, but given more time the abiogenesis theory could become more plausable.
@BlueMajic100 I think when they trace it back, they will find that the earliest bacteria developed in asteroids and small planets. Anything that was icy, rocky, and sometimes warm enough for liquid water. Larger bodies cooled later and are impacted by these asteroids. I think in this way, life is carried along with matter as the universe expands. I don't think life could possibly happen in just one place, you need a gigantic system like the universe to produce the improbable. Just guessing :)
I would seriously appreciate a reply. BTW, I love all your videos, especially the "big four", Evolution of life on other planets, Extinctions Dinosaurs Mammoth, 2012 doomsday? Fall of the Astec Empire and the Lost Civilizations. Thanks in advance. :)
I'm only 18, and instead of wasting my time drinking till dead, i watch these types videos almost every day. I love science, especially cosmology, basically everything related to space, time, religion, science, or humanity. I just wondered, how can you prove that universe is infinite? I simply cannot comprehend. Maybe the borders of our visible cosmos will expand and we will realize that even our universe is actually small. Or what about this: maybe our universe is in a dark hole? Anyway, reply.
@12NiBer12 The Universe is not eternal it has a finite past. But some form of energy must have always existed. You can never have an absolute beginning because that absolute beginning would need a time, and if there was already time, how is that the absolute beginning? I guess this is why people believe in Jesus.
Certain 'facts' are in fact false. For example soil sample from the moon is completely sterile. Bacteria found in the camera of the Surveyor craft is contamination from earth
"Since life can only come from life, it originated from another planet." I don't get how this statement can be a fact by any means. It doesn't get how life only coming from life explains how it originated at all- it still doesn't explain the chicken or the egg. I guess we will brush off the possibility of some life originating on earth then because we don't understand how that would happen.
i've found the author of this video to be...IGNORANT....it's the word he says over and over again and actually this is the word that can describe him the best. If life doesn't come from Earth but from other galaxies/planets - that still doesn't change anything, it doesn't disprove god as well as the fact that creation of a bacteria on the planet couldn't have happened for it would have had to be an extraordinary coincedence - well, provided the vastness of space, the odds were fairly high.
@fileqx This isn't about the origins of life in the universe, but the origins of life on earth, It doesn't set up to disprove God, but show evidence for lifes origins on this planet coming from elswhere. Obviously the extremophiles need an origin too, but that's a different video.
I think that as a star expands and contracts through its life, the difference in heat on various planets at differing times can provide the conditions in which life can form. Depending on the planets wealth of minerals and metals will contribute to life thriving or failing. The size of the planet and volcanic activity will be a major factor in the process of passing the archaic forms of life around. I believe they then develop as necessary for planetary conditions until time they can impact it.
Author assume that miraculously the simplest bacteria emerge from soup.
But why bacteria? First was not bacteria, but much more simpler life form, whose have evolve, through multiple steps into bacteria.
And if author assume that life come to Earth from space, then how life have get into space? From other planet?
Now the question whence have originated life in others planets? From simplest molecules which is found in Earth? Why life not evolve in Earth from the same molecule?
Could it not mean that as the world changes and the genetic info adapts to those changes that the end result is still far from being reached and that the organism can be something much different than us? At any rate, very good information for debate!
This is a very informative documentary and provides a strong case for the origins of life coming from other planets. The questions that comes to mind are, if life did originate from other planets, how did they originate on those planets? If DNA was inherited from our ancient ancestors, who is to say that the transformation of that genetic information ends with us?
Quando o ser humano não sabia que o planeta era redondo e orbitava o Sol, foi se entregando à fantasias e medo. Ainda hoje, se dissermos a um indivíduo religioso demais que Deus é matemática e não criou apenas uma civilização "na morada de meu pai", com certeza ele vai dizer que você precisa afastar diabo de sua alma.
what I can't stand is that people would rather watch Hanna Montana pole dancing rather than understand the cosmic knowledge hidden from us in the universe. For fuck sakes she has almost 18x10^6 views!!!
I find it very disappointing to only see their are no more than 120,000 views of this video.
If money were no option in the world, I'd develope a system to get us into space, looking for life somehow. but before that, make people into slaves of labor who do not find knowledge as a privledge.
Adam+Eve= Cain+ Abel..Cain - Abel= Cain ... God banished Cain .. cain went on to marry and make children ... Who did he marry and have children with????
@d1ricanunv "Who did he marry and have children with"?? His sister you asshole, have you not read the bible? Adam and Eve had a lot more children than Kane and Abel.
@d1ricanunv Where did the aliens come from? and the aliens before them? and so on. Everbody needs an origin, and if they just evolved some place else! Why then could we not have evolved here?
people need to remember. EVERYTHING CAME FROM SPACE INCLUDING THE EARTH. It's not as if the earth came first and wasn't effected by anythng around it! It makes more sense to presume the origin of life was around before the earth was formed.
@DunxMeister well some scientists say it was a chemical mixture, and the distance that the earth has from the sun, (was just right) plus the water, that started life.
WTF. if your saying the "first creatues on earth came from other planets" YOU are saying there is indeed extrateristrial life outside this planet!! so if anyone believes in this video. YOU agree there is alien life outside this planet!
How arrogant it is to believe that we are the only life on the vast sea of an endless universe. Of course there exists other life forms in the universe, however it does not imply that we've been visited by intelligent aliens on earth from other planets.
And its people like you who toss the word around of "believe this, believe that... oh anyone watching this is a nut case because they believe in aliens". FUCK OFF you christian fundamentalist! Start getting used to the idea that their is life out there other than our planet. I don't believe in extrasolar life, I its a fucking fact!
It is funny how this guys says "Where there is water, there is life" lol, that is not necessary true. Taking the term literally I can boil water and filter it to the point that I will have a cup of water and no life in it. Thus I will have water and no life.
There were no oceans 3.9 million years ago mate. That's the point. There is no other concieved way of life appearing on earth that what is explained in this video.
fantastic video and it is a fact that life on earth and mars was brought from other ancient planets in the vastness of space and surely the other planets that brought the living algae and other orginisms to earth and mars will be just like our own planet earth because it is the same algae and orginisms.
there's a sciencetific theory called "broken equilibrium" i never understood what that bible passage was trying to say until i heard that theory explaned. cool huh?
in the beginning there was the word and the word was with God and the word was God and the face of God hovered over the deep for the earth was null and void.
perfect symatry is nothing, non existance, the idea is kinda related to the big bang theory (now abandoned) but still it was very interesting
This is all very informative and I agree with all conclusions involving life on earth, but, and it's a big one, if life creates life, how was 1 life created in the begining? According to this it would be unanswerable. I'm not religious but until that answer is supplied then what else is there but a miracle of some type?
As a proponent of an infinite universe theory, you have probably thought about this before: If it is infinite, would there by a 100% probability that there are infinite versions of the same reality (the world, you and I) occurring at the exact same time with the exact same outcome? If so, do you think that the universe would have to repeat itself over great distances and immense periods of time? How can time exist in light of eternalness?
If you go to the Cosmology. net website, there is an article, found near the bottom of the page, titled: The Myth of the Big Bang. It is written so a non-specialist can comprehend it.
As to your other thought-provoking questions... No way to address these issues at youtube. However, consider the concept of time, i.e. right now. Now. The perpetual now now now...which is gone the moment you try to grasp it. Eternals nows. Maybe NOW is eternity, and human consciousness is Finite
I sincerely appreciate your responses. I will take time to read the article and consider its implications. I will be back with thoughts on the article and on your now=eternity explanation. Please let me know if you become annoyed with me, I will graciously take it to another forum. Peace!
How does the fact that BBT was proposed by a Catholic negate its legitimacy?I understand that it hasn't been proven, but it definitely doesn't imply a creator.
BBT shows that the source material for the universe was actually eternal, and had no beginning as far as we can see (whole universe squished into a singularity).Sorry for not going to the site before responding (I will though), but I had to state that BBT is not a creation story.
Your videos are very interesting, but I have to ask you how you think that proponents of big bang and abiogenesis are religious cultists. I don't get it. There is a reason why big bang is not in most public school textbooks, and that reason is that there is not enough hard evidence for it. Big bang is the best theory we have right now, and it is based in mathematics, not faith. Also, the theory does not imply that everything came from nothing. Everything came from everything.
Also, I might add, that the big bang theory is falsifiable. All scientific claims are. As far as I know, everything is pointing to some kind of big bang. While it is not beyond reasonable doubt, it is absurd to claim that it is based in some kind of dogma. It's not religion. Religious beliefs in general are based entirely in faith and unfalsifiable claims, which the BBT is not.
@pissandwich Cosmic microwave background is the icing on the cake, along with the red shift...Big bang defo happened, but it was not a bang, just an expansion of space-time. Now We need to find out what happened pre-bang, or my dad will keep crediting jesus.
Thank you for your comment. The term "big bang" was coined by Hoyle, who mocked the theory as ridiculous. The theory was proposed by a Catholic priest--a Bishop in the Pope's Council of Scientists. He wanted to make the Bible scientific. The big bang is not really a "theory." Its a hypothesis which has failed every major test. Creation such as a big bang, implies a creator. An eternal universe has no creator, and no god.
OK, I went to your site, and saw that only two articles had vaguely to do with big bang theory. I must admit that those papers are WAY over my head (layman here). Could you point me to a source that suggests the theory has failed every "major test"? What were these tests, and how were they conducted? I stand by my point that big bang theory is absolutely not a creation story,but a proposed scientific explanation for universal expansion.
Also, have you allowed your biases to get in the way? What evidence do you have that the universe is "infinite". By that I mean that the universe as we know it goes on forever. I see BBT as a viable explanation, yet I also am able to see that the universe could be infinite in an entirely different way. Assume the theory is correct for a second. Is it possible that there could have been multiple outcomes, multiple big bangs?
Where did the life from the comet come from? Did it come from GOD? Did it come from MARS? You wont be able to answer my question with empirical evidence. This I know with 1000% accuracy.
You have no scientific evidence that life came from space! Until we find TRUE evidence not speculative evidence from contaminated specimens that you show in your videos.
Until we find a meteorite that contains life, its all science fiction. We went through thousands and found nothing. Still waiting...
Meteorites have been found with life you idiot, algae has been found in meteorites and evidence suggests that algae was also the first form of life on earth, yet again more supporting this theory. If you learned this theory in its entirity you will find a mass amount of evidence to support it.
Oh and percent means out of 100, so 1000 percent is wrong as well :-)
We have read your comment "Americanp." The discovery was "all over the news" in 1996 and for the following year. You may not have been paying attention.
What is the difference between you believing that a comet brought life and believing that God created life...
Absolutely nothing! They are both beliefs backed by no scientific knowledge. There isn't a speck of evidence for either. Bring me empirical evidence--then we will talk.
The statement about abiogenesis was not that of a religious one but one that has at least some scientific base. Miller's experiment showed that the basic building blocks of life--amino acids could be formed in the lab.
Abiogenesis is right out of the Bible, Genesis, Chapter 1. We do not accept religious explanations. For answers to your questions about meteors and microfossils, we refer you to a scientific article which details the evidence, titled: Life on Earth Came From Other Planets.
This and other scientific articles dealing with these issues can be read, for free, at Cosmology. com
I don't know about this. I have heard this arguement before, and this video probably doesn't do the whole idea justice, but it seems to just be a regress. How did life on Earth form? From space. Where did that life come from? Other space.
Eventually, there HAS to be some form of abiogenesis. Also, these fossils in meteorites are 4.5 billion years old. Shouldn't they be much older? Say, at least an additional billion years? It takes a bit of time for solar systems to form.
Thank yuou for your comment "Garrett." This video is part of a series on this subject. A detailed, scholarly article that provides additional facts in support of this video, can be read for free at the Cosmology website. The title: Life on Earth Came From Other Planets."
There are other articles and videos on this subject which can also be found at:
I re-read my comment and it sounded asinine. I didn't mean it to be. I will definitely read up on it.
Thank you for being curteous enough to give a respectable reply, instead of saying something like "ur an idoit!!!1" which is so common on this thing we call YouTube.
Hi there, I am wondering what you're thoughts are on the origins of the life forms that created life on earth. How were they initially created? I guess that opens up a bigger question on how anything was created. It's the human condition to seek this knowledge I believe.
Thank you for your comment "you." Perhaps it is possible that life began on an ancient world whose chemistry is completely unlike that of Earth. Beyond that, we can only speculate about ultimate origins, and this includes wondering if perhaps life has no beginning, if life is eternal... or perhaps DNA-based carbon life is the waste product of some non-DNA non-Carbon entity, which, to put it crudely, digests certain substances and defecates living molecules--we can only speculate.
Those are great theories. Very interesting. What are your thoughts on the creation on non living matter? Planets, gases, etc? The big bang theory explains it only so far, but what was there before the bang, what triggered the bang, and how was matter developed from nothing? I'm sure you don't have the answers but your educated theories would be interesting to hear! Thank you for the response!
If panspermia is correct, why are there some bacteria with left and some with right hand amino acids? Life can only have one kind of amino acid chain, so if life came from space it had already picked a type of amino acids. Left and Right handed amino acids are incompatible and a creature can't change. Life can't have both unless it starts with the option, and theres no selection pressure either way. Are you saying that both classes of life traveled through space? Hmmmmmm
how many years we been here? and learn soooooooooo much i meen we know everything about whats around us just not what we dont see and other planets if we still here in 200 years we will know everything or at least what we need to know to prove half these jokers deniyin more then us when they know sh1t them self but this is alot more evidence then them sayin no no no. event ended!
but lived on moon for years and moon is the closest to us out of trilions on planets and suns out there. also no beginning? thats impossible a fact of life it started somewhere thats like sayin we been here for ever but its not true so there was a beginning to everything even the planets and there is a end to everything that also a fact. there is more then us much more better maybe as they have better resorces or been here alot longer one the two there is more this proves it
all sorry what a load of beep! 1st many say no? yes no there no god. we did come from else where there is no other possible sulotion as there was alot more before earth was born! also no earth didnt make it preg lmao its just the fossels from another planet could live on earth and makes us like if u watch part 4 its facts a fossle lived on moon and died 2000 degs higher and lower we bring it to earth and it came alive omg where did we come from? another planet billions away that went super
So the first life on our planet surviveed the cataclysm that destroyed thier planet. Then flung thru the vaccum of space for however many light years away and then gets incenarted in our atmosphere crashed into our planet and probably purlvarized w/e rock they were on and somehow. This has never happened again. Meaning that Never has another meteorite carried an alien life form to our planet. Why would you think this is a plausible theory. God is the only explanation.
I knew about the experiments about the limits of survival among microbes - they can survive more than 1000 times more G-force shock than humans. This fact only means they are the ultimate cosmonauts.
it IS possible for life to be created through non - life. just because there wasnt a person sitting there watching happen and documenting it, doesnt mean its simply impossible. the universe its about 14 billion years old and to big for any human to comprehend. there is a lot of time and space in which life could have been created. from OUR experince, we havnt seen it happen, but its obvious that at somepoint it DID happen or we wouldnt be having this conversation.
A lot of the claims this guy makes are completely unsupported scientifically. The eternal universe model hasn't been applicable since the discovery of cosmic expansion. He also seems to so blatantly disregard the well founded theory of energy conservation, if I'm hearing him right when he talks about stars continuously blowing up to make new stars. There's more than a few problems with that idea...
A lot of what he says is supported, but his understanding seems to be a bit... eccentric.
Yeah... lets just attribute everything we don't presently completely understand to Jesus like people have been doing for the last 2000 years and getting NOWHERE!
While others have taken it upon themselves to advance our knowledge of the world by studying the world and getting real and provable answers from NATURE...
It's almost too simple... And keep in mind that if something doesn't make any sense, it's probably because you don't understand it.
at some point, we all think universe had to be created. I know, most of that goes beyond our imagination... but the answer is very easy:
If life came to earth from other planets and chemicals formed life and... bla... at some point it had to start. So something thats ABOVE that all, something thats greater and bigger than the whole universe and thats even smart enought to do all these things had to create the universe... and us at least. till now noone could create life vom chemicals. just 1.
saying that there is somebody or something out there that created life because nothing else makes sense, makes just a little sense. because then, who created who ever created us? and dont say he always has been and always will be, becuase that is just taking logic out of the picture completely. dont say that He is above logic and our understanding becuase that is just a cover up, a different way of saying " ok this doesnt make any sense either, but i dont want to admit it."
leviallen27 chemicals are all over the universe its the matter that creates the universe life had to be created by matter from matter that already existed, probably from a meteor or a planet
from the universe... the chemicals are floating around our solar system and are on planets and in the meteores that are said to have brought life to our planet
i could say the EXACT same thing, only i could say the big bang created the unviverse, and if u say God, then were did God come from? ur just adding a step to the inveitable conclusion.... we have absolutely no fucking idea how the hell anyhting ever got done in the unviverse. the idea of God is just as irrational as the big bang, or a giant hippo for that matter. argueing is senseless, beacause we dont have the slightest clue.
ok, see the bug problem with the big bang is still a theory. no one knows how god was created, he just is. same thing with the big bang theory. they don't know what started the universe other than it just did. our minds can't comprehend certain things because the information is not all their yet for us to see. once we find the information from where ever it is out there, then we'll know.
exactly, i think we might be arguing the same point here, the chances of God creating the unvierse are identical to the big bang theory, since we have little to no solid evidence for either. by that note, the afore mentioned giant hippo creating the universe is just as likely. until god himself comes down and reveals himself to the entire world, then nobody knosFOR SURE he did it, same goes for the big bang, until we have solid evidence, we will never kno. i personally think the hippo did it tho
i agree that life came from other planets but that life had to originate from somewhere else. the first life form had to be created by non- life because life cant come from a life form that doesn't exist. either a higher being created life (which i doubt) or life came to be through random chemical reactions.
Yeah, I hate people saying life came from other planets, but then I was like, how would it get there in the first place. I agree with you and mindreader1975 100%.
and it turn out miraculously we are doing fine now so our God(alien) appears as Zeus to lead and tell us to do things well and starts to reveal themselves slowly (that explains the close encounters at modern age) as we develop to be more wiser each day~
I know that every body finds bacteria and small stuff, but i want someone to find advanced stuff like us. There probily is its just out of our solar system and we will never get to it :(
Coyotendkm can u plz explain or prove evolution.its always the thories of evolution not the facts,and even the founders of this theory in their late books accept the fact. anyway i have no problem with bactria crusing through the space(lucky bec). ITs only the One who does it all with his great knowledge.
In Proper scientific language you dont talk about facts, just theories.
Our theories for how elecricity works are still just theories but seem to work well enough for you to be on your computer right now. One day someone may have a break through that changes the theory and we will have even more complicated devicees.
My point is religion will give you facts and wont change them if they dont fit reality, but science gives you theories that change as our understanding of the universe changes.
evolution has been seen taking action in the last century. during the industrial revolution in Britan a type of white moth would land on the soot covered trees an be eaten by birds. the moths that had the genetic mutation of a few dark spots where lees likely to be seen and passed down that gene to their offspring. now there are no more white moths in that area, just black/brown ones. and they are the same species. Evolution= random mutation + natural selection/ survival of the fittest.
Is it possible that bacterial life didn't form in ancient planetary oceans and pools, as once thought, but instead formed in space itself, inside of comets or some other non-planetary space debris? It may be a naturally occurring process, like the formation of stars. When the conditions are right, stars form. Maybe the same is true for single celled life and viruses. And from where it forms, it rains down on planets, and then continues to evolve there.
It does make you wonder what process started life. It makes sense that the first planets may not have had life.
I doubt there was some pool or acids that started it for the whole universe, the idea of a type of comet isnt a bad start to finding other types of places that could start the process.
you're all wrong it was god! :-/
DunxMeister 3 weeks ago
@tnafguy It's not called a "star factory" It's called a stellar nursery. Nobody has seen a star form because it's a loooooooooooong ass process. But, if you understand gravity and fusion, I'ts easy to understand how they could form naturally without Jesus.
BlueMajic100 1 month ago
mmmmmm
tomid22166 2 months ago
I used to believe that life evolved on earth, but the more likely explanation for life appearing so early in earths history was that it was brought here from space. It is easy to accept that, and makes sense when you consider that no lab in the world has successfully reproduced life using early earth conditions. Now the question remains, where DID complex reproducing life start? If not 5 billion years ago, then 10? 13? We only have about 13.7 billion years to work with here...
Titantron9000 6 months ago
@Titantron9000 Nobody has produced life in the lab, but with early earth conditions they have produced amino-acids which are the building blocks of life. There is plenty of difficulties with the idea life arose on this planet, I agree, and I am also going with the extremophile theory myself, but given more time the abiogenesis theory could become more plausable.
BlueMajic100 1 month ago
@BlueMajic100 I think when they trace it back, they will find that the earliest bacteria developed in asteroids and small planets. Anything that was icy, rocky, and sometimes warm enough for liquid water. Larger bodies cooled later and are impacted by these asteroids. I think in this way, life is carried along with matter as the universe expands. I don't think life could possibly happen in just one place, you need a gigantic system like the universe to produce the improbable. Just guessing :)
Titantron9000 1 month ago
person who made these videos has no heart or passion
xxliljpxx 9 months ago
@xxliljpxx How so?
CJbass420 8 months ago
I would seriously appreciate a reply. BTW, I love all your videos, especially the "big four", Evolution of life on other planets, Extinctions Dinosaurs Mammoth, 2012 doomsday? Fall of the Astec Empire and the Lost Civilizations. Thanks in advance. :)
12NiBer12 9 months ago
@12NiBer12 I hope you know the mayans did not say the world ends in 2012.
CJbass420 8 months ago
@CJbass420 OFC man.
12NiBer12 8 months ago
@12NiBer12 Whats OFC mean?
CJbass420 8 months ago
@CJbass420 Of Course.
12NiBer12 8 months ago
I'm only 18, and instead of wasting my time drinking till dead, i watch these types videos almost every day. I love science, especially cosmology, basically everything related to space, time, religion, science, or humanity. I just wondered, how can you prove that universe is infinite? I simply cannot comprehend. Maybe the borders of our visible cosmos will expand and we will realize that even our universe is actually small. Or what about this: maybe our universe is in a dark hole? Anyway, reply.
12NiBer12 9 months ago
@12NiBer12 u may be completely right.. we know nothing, despite a lot that we have discovered
MrSweetlife92 9 months ago
@MrSweetlife92 indeed, well tnx for replying, but i was reffering to rhawn joseph, but tnx anyway...
12NiBer12 9 months ago
@12NiBer12 The Universe is not eternal it has a finite past. But some form of energy must have always existed. You can never have an absolute beginning because that absolute beginning would need a time, and if there was already time, how is that the absolute beginning? I guess this is why people believe in Jesus.
BlueMajic100 1 month ago
@BlueMajic100 You can't know that.
12NiBer12 1 month ago
Ideas presented are highly controversial.
Certain 'facts' are in fact false. For example soil sample from the moon is completely sterile. Bacteria found in the camera of the Surveyor craft is contamination from earth
bxi48 9 months ago
funny how theres no sign of life out of earth :L
p4r50wnage 10 months ago
"Since life can only come from life, it originated from another planet." I don't get how this statement can be a fact by any means. It doesn't get how life only coming from life explains how it originated at all- it still doesn't explain the chicken or the egg. I guess we will brush off the possibility of some life originating on earth then because we don't understand how that would happen.
Sodomeat 10 months ago
dinosaurs did not come from the moon or space. God created them and He
created the universe and earth. this guy is wrong and does not make sense
bdillan1957 11 months ago
i've found the author of this video to be...IGNORANT....it's the word he says over and over again and actually this is the word that can describe him the best. If life doesn't come from Earth but from other galaxies/planets - that still doesn't change anything, it doesn't disprove god as well as the fact that creation of a bacteria on the planet couldn't have happened for it would have had to be an extraordinary coincedence - well, provided the vastness of space, the odds were fairly high.
fileqx 1 year ago
@fileqx This isn't about the origins of life in the universe, but the origins of life on earth, It doesn't set up to disprove God, but show evidence for lifes origins on this planet coming from elswhere. Obviously the extremophiles need an origin too, but that's a different video.
BlueMajic100 1 month ago
I think that as a star expands and contracts through its life, the difference in heat on various planets at differing times can provide the conditions in which life can form. Depending on the planets wealth of minerals and metals will contribute to life thriving or failing. The size of the planet and volcanic activity will be a major factor in the process of passing the archaic forms of life around. I believe they then develop as necessary for planetary conditions until time they can impact it.
Astarkat 1 year ago
Author assume that miraculously the simplest bacteria emerge from soup.
But why bacteria? First was not bacteria, but much more simpler life form, whose have evolve, through multiple steps into bacteria.
And if author assume that life come to Earth from space, then how life have get into space? From other planet?
Now the question whence have originated life in others planets? From simplest molecules which is found in Earth? Why life not evolve in Earth from the same molecule?
liutasx 1 year ago
@liutasx "how did life get to earth from other planets" nobody cares, that's a different video.
BlueMajic100 1 month ago
Comment removed
liutasx 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Author assume that miraculously the simplest bacteria emerge from soup.
But why bacteria? First was not bacteria, but much more simpler life form, whose have evolve, through multiple steps into bacteria.
And if author assume that life come to Earth from space, then how life have get into space? From other planet?
Now the question whence have originated life in others planets? From simplest molecules which is found in Earth? Why from same molecules in Earth?
liutasx 1 year ago
Comment removed
liutasx 1 year ago
Could it not mean that as the world changes and the genetic info adapts to those changes that the end result is still far from being reached and that the organism can be something much different than us? At any rate, very good information for debate!
camachojose30 1 year ago
This is a very informative documentary and provides a strong case for the origins of life coming from other planets. The questions that comes to mind are, if life did originate from other planets, how did they originate on those planets? If DNA was inherited from our ancient ancestors, who is to say that the transformation of that genetic information ends with us?
camachojose30 1 year ago
Quando o ser humano não sabia que o planeta era redondo e orbitava o Sol, foi se entregando à fantasias e medo. Ainda hoje, se dissermos a um indivíduo religioso demais que Deus é matemática e não criou apenas uma civilização "na morada de meu pai", com certeza ele vai dizer que você precisa afastar diabo de sua alma.
astrofisico7 1 year ago
what I can't stand is that people would rather watch Hanna Montana pole dancing rather than understand the cosmic knowledge hidden from us in the universe. For fuck sakes she has almost 18x10^6 views!!!
I find it very disappointing to only see their are no more than 120,000 views of this video.
If money were no option in the world, I'd develope a system to get us into space, looking for life somehow. but before that, make people into slaves of labor who do not find knowledge as a privledge.
TKgeniusHELLTX 1 year ago 2
Adam+Eve= Cain+ Abel..Cain - Abel= Cain ... God banished Cain .. cain went on to marry and make children ... Who did he marry and have children with????
d1ricanunv 1 year ago
@d1ricanunv "Who did he marry and have children with"?? His sister you asshole, have you not read the bible? Adam and Eve had a lot more children than Kane and Abel.
BlueMajic100 1 month ago
You dont know that what people call god or gods were actually aliens from space who came and breed humans on earth???
d1ricanunv 1 year ago
Yes! finaly a person who has the same idea! =D
How elles could life suddenly apear out of a volcano planet?
solitajre222 1 year ago
@d1ricanunv Where did the aliens come from? and the aliens before them? and so on. Everbody needs an origin, and if they just evolved some place else! Why then could we not have evolved here?
BlueMajic100 1 month ago
argh zaphodbeeblebrox did it all,, he made you
,,,,,,and you too
ANCESTERSMEMORIES 2 years ago
people need to remember. EVERYTHING CAME FROM SPACE INCLUDING THE EARTH. It's not as if the earth came first and wasn't effected by anythng around it! It makes more sense to presume the origin of life was around before the earth was formed.
DunxMeister 2 years ago 6
@DunxMeister well some scientists say it was a chemical mixture, and the distance that the earth has from the sun, (was just right) plus the water, that started life.
creativeprojects720 3 weeks ago
@creativeprojects720 yeah, amino acids
creativeprojects720 3 weeks ago
WTF. if your saying the "first creatues on earth came from other planets" YOU are saying there is indeed extrateristrial life outside this planet!! so if anyone believes in this video. YOU agree there is alien life outside this planet!
blackbunnyhops 2 years ago
How arrogant it is to believe that we are the only life on the vast sea of an endless universe. Of course there exists other life forms in the universe, however it does not imply that we've been visited by intelligent aliens on earth from other planets.
AdamantAtheist 2 years ago
And its people like you who toss the word around of "believe this, believe that... oh anyone watching this is a nut case because they believe in aliens". FUCK OFF you christian fundamentalist! Start getting used to the idea that their is life out there other than our planet. I don't believe in extrasolar life, I its a fucking fact!
TKgeniusHELLTX 1 year ago
It is funny how this guys says "Where there is water, there is life" lol, that is not necessary true. Taking the term literally I can boil water and filter it to the point that I will have a cup of water and no life in it. Thus I will have water and no life.
LambdaQuarks 2 years ago
WRONG!! a quick search of extromophiles will suffice. Your are talking shit out of ignorance. I'd bet you've never heard of extromophiles.
AdamantAtheist 2 years ago
@AdamantAtheist hahaha u tit.
BlueMajic100 1 month ago
@LambdaQuarks Eeeerr....no! he meant naturally occuring water.
BlueMajic100 1 month ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
repent
DownWithTheOwl 2 years ago
that 'hand of god' sentence ruined the whole video.
abhishikt 2 years ago
life couldve come from the bottom of the ocean?
DeathDefied69 2 years ago
Comment removed
tyrellarson 2 years ago
There were no oceans 3.9 million years ago mate. That's the point. There is no other concieved way of life appearing on earth that what is explained in this video.
tyrellarson 2 years ago 2
@tyrellarson What do you think of the abiogenesis theory?
BlueMajic100 1 month ago
@DeathDefied69 Nnnaaah...life was here before the bottom of the ocean.
BlueMajic100 1 month ago
who's religious here? -__-
demolition000 2 years ago
fantastic video and it is a fact that life on earth and mars was brought from other ancient planets in the vastness of space and surely the other planets that brought the living algae and other orginisms to earth and mars will be just like our own planet earth because it is the same algae and orginisms.
CALIFORNIASAM2 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
in the begining, God created the heaven and the Earth...and the Earth was without form and void.....
yankeegurl62 2 years ago
there's a sciencetific theory called "broken equilibrium" i never understood what that bible passage was trying to say until i heard that theory explaned. cool huh?
in the beginning there was the word and the word was with God and the word was God and the face of God hovered over the deep for the earth was null and void.
perfect symatry is nothing, non existance, the idea is kinda related to the big bang theory (now abandoned) but still it was very interesting
ruben18753 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Beginning: Time
Heavens: Space
Earth: Matter
The 3 primary elements that make up the universe all right in the first verse of the Bible - fascinating.
byblosadvocate 2 years ago
that's your interpretation
thom188 2 years ago
@byblosadvocate So at a certain TIME!!!! time was created? yep ok.
BlueMajic100 1 month ago
that means there is life on other planets (far way).... they might be people like humans
still new to tec like us (dumb)
redeaglealb 2 years ago
why not seed mars and our moon now? i didn't know bacteria could survive in the vacume of space.
ruben18753 2 years ago
they are in somekind of hibernation ?? lol dunno
pipinho114 2 years ago
only life can come from life??...rubbish
cwwiss1 2 years ago
This is all very informative and I agree with all conclusions involving life on earth, but, and it's a big one, if life creates life, how was 1 life created in the begining? According to this it would be unanswerable. I'm not religious but until that answer is supplied then what else is there but a miracle of some type?
gezza1977 2 years ago
@gezza1977 It was majic dude.
BlueMajic100 1 month ago
Very well thought out and informative. Now if the mainstream would just accept the facts.
IarwainBen 2 years ago 7
Whats the music plz ?
DrowSHeart 2 years ago
Cosmology. com
The music includes Beethoven's 1st, 3rd, 5th and 9th symphonies.
JournalofCosmology. com
Sarastarlight 2 years ago
you are wrong
luizformula 2 years ago
@luizformula HaHa...how so? Enlighten us please, don't just state something so bold then go to bed.
BlueMajic100 1 month ago
why r these comments so long?
Azulblueone 2 years ago
As a proponent of an infinite universe theory, you have probably thought about this before: If it is infinite, would there by a 100% probability that there are infinite versions of the same reality (the world, you and I) occurring at the exact same time with the exact same outcome? If so, do you think that the universe would have to repeat itself over great distances and immense periods of time? How can time exist in light of eternalness?
pissandwich 2 years ago 2
Cosmology. com
If you go to the Cosmology. net website, there is an article, found near the bottom of the page, titled: The Myth of the Big Bang. It is written so a non-specialist can comprehend it.
As to your other thought-provoking questions... No way to address these issues at youtube. However, consider the concept of time, i.e. right now. Now. The perpetual now now now...which is gone the moment you try to grasp it. Eternals nows. Maybe NOW is eternity, and human consciousness is Finite
Sarastarlight 2 years ago
I sincerely appreciate your responses. I will take time to read the article and consider its implications. I will be back with thoughts on the article and on your now=eternity explanation. Please let me know if you become annoyed with me, I will graciously take it to another forum. Peace!
pissandwich 2 years ago
@Sarastarlight Wow! Great comment. Humanity sure could use a dose of humility.
olga2415 1 year ago
How does the fact that BBT was proposed by a Catholic negate its legitimacy?I understand that it hasn't been proven, but it definitely doesn't imply a creator.
pissandwich 2 years ago
@pissandwich The bible says "And the lord stretches out the heavens from a decimal region" the big bang is in the koran mate, now get praying.
BlueMajic100 1 month ago
BBT shows that the source material for the universe was actually eternal, and had no beginning as far as we can see (whole universe squished into a singularity).Sorry for not going to the site before responding (I will though), but I had to state that BBT is not a creation story.
pissandwich 2 years ago 2
Your videos are very interesting, but I have to ask you how you think that proponents of big bang and abiogenesis are religious cultists. I don't get it. There is a reason why big bang is not in most public school textbooks, and that reason is that there is not enough hard evidence for it. Big bang is the best theory we have right now, and it is based in mathematics, not faith. Also, the theory does not imply that everything came from nothing. Everything came from everything.
pissandwich 2 years ago
Also, I might add, that the big bang theory is falsifiable. All scientific claims are. As far as I know, everything is pointing to some kind of big bang. While it is not beyond reasonable doubt, it is absurd to claim that it is based in some kind of dogma. It's not religion. Religious beliefs in general are based entirely in faith and unfalsifiable claims, which the BBT is not.
pissandwich 2 years ago 2
@pissandwich Cosmic microwave background is the icing on the cake, along with the red shift...Big bang defo happened, but it was not a bang, just an expansion of space-time. Now We need to find out what happened pre-bang, or my dad will keep crediting jesus.
BlueMajic100 1 month ago
Cosmology. com
Thank you for your comment. The term "big bang" was coined by Hoyle, who mocked the theory as ridiculous. The theory was proposed by a Catholic priest--a Bishop in the Pope's Council of Scientists. He wanted to make the Bible scientific. The big bang is not really a "theory." Its a hypothesis which has failed every major test. Creation such as a big bang, implies a creator. An eternal universe has no creator, and no god.
See Cosmology. com
Sarastarlight 2 years ago
OK, I went to your site, and saw that only two articles had vaguely to do with big bang theory. I must admit that those papers are WAY over my head (layman here). Could you point me to a source that suggests the theory has failed every "major test"? What were these tests, and how were they conducted? I stand by my point that big bang theory is absolutely not a creation story,but a proposed scientific explanation for universal expansion.
pissandwich 2 years ago
Also, have you allowed your biases to get in the way? What evidence do you have that the universe is "infinite". By that I mean that the universe as we know it goes on forever. I see BBT as a viable explanation, yet I also am able to see that the universe could be infinite in an entirely different way. Assume the theory is correct for a second. Is it possible that there could have been multiple outcomes, multiple big bangs?
pissandwich 2 years ago
WOW!!!!! i hate it
spooker89 2 years ago
It's a very interesting hypothesis. Certainly more believable than Santa Claus, god and the tooth fairies. Where was this published?
FLUSEM666 2 years ago
prove to me that all this bullshit is real!!
PLAYSTATIONREVIEWERS 2 years ago 3
Where did the life from the comet come from? Did it come from GOD? Did it come from MARS? You wont be able to answer my question with empirical evidence. This I know with 1000% accuracy.
You have no scientific evidence that life came from space! Until we find TRUE evidence not speculative evidence from contaminated specimens that you show in your videos.
Until we find a meteorite that contains life, its all science fiction. We went through thousands and found nothing. Still waiting...
americanpolitico 2 years ago
Meteorites have been found with life you idiot, algae has been found in meteorites and evidence suggests that algae was also the first form of life on earth, yet again more supporting this theory. If you learned this theory in its entirity you will find a mass amount of evidence to support it.
Oh and percent means out of 100, so 1000 percent is wrong as well :-)
benyboybob 2 years ago
Errrrm no they haven't, rofl. There has never been a single meteorite with alien life forms on it.
What a joke.
ChaseKittens 2 years ago 2
If we found meteorite with alien lifeforms it would be all over the news.
americanpolitico 2 years ago
JournalofCosmology. com
We have read your comment "Americanp." The discovery was "all over the news" in 1996 and for the following year. You may not have been paying attention.
Cosmology. com
Cosmology. com
Sarastarlight 2 years ago
so was a second unexploded bomb inside the oklahoma city building. then the news just kinda forgets and noone ever mentions it again.
ruben18753 2 years ago
@americanpolitico YEAH RIGHT! ;-P Like the mainstream media would tell us anything!!
Anticlimaximum777 1 year ago
@americanpolitico Oh you mean the news owned by the government who in turn owns NASA, who in turn doesn't want us to know about alien life?
banheden 1 year ago
What is the difference between you believing that a comet brought life and believing that God created life...
Absolutely nothing! They are both beliefs backed by no scientific knowledge. There isn't a speck of evidence for either. Bring me empirical evidence--then we will talk.
The statement about abiogenesis was not that of a religious one but one that has at least some scientific base. Miller's experiment showed that the basic building blocks of life--amino acids could be formed in the lab.
americanpolitico 2 years ago
Amino acids show nothing bacteria fossil show everything
stan007stan 2 years ago
The problem with that is there was no fossil that ever had any bacteria!
If you do your own research instead of believing everything on YouTube then you would know that.
We would have changed the science books and it would have already been on your local news.
americanpolitico 2 years ago
Very interesting hypothesis. For your hypothesis to work you must think that abiogenesis created life on Earth.
Or you think that complex living organisms arrived here on earth?
Can you direct me to a reputable link that
in 1961 algae were discovered on a meteorite? I can't find it on the internet.
americanpolitico 2 years ago
Cosmology. com
Abiogenesis is right out of the Bible, Genesis, Chapter 1. We do not accept religious explanations. For answers to your questions about meteors and microfossils, we refer you to a scientific article which details the evidence, titled: Life on Earth Came From Other Planets.
This and other scientific articles dealing with these issues can be read, for free, at Cosmology. com
Sarastarlight 2 years ago
There isn't any proof for either theory. You believe that it happened. I merely think it might of happened.
Last time I checked truth is knowing something with certainty. Neither theory fills that void.
americanpolitico 2 years ago
okay if you say in the last part that life came from another place then what created it there?
or the place before it?or before that?
life has to have been created because the universe itself was created before life.
shoshanish 2 years ago
I don't know about this. I have heard this arguement before, and this video probably doesn't do the whole idea justice, but it seems to just be a regress. How did life on Earth form? From space. Where did that life come from? Other space.
Eventually, there HAS to be some form of abiogenesis. Also, these fossils in meteorites are 4.5 billion years old. Shouldn't they be much older? Say, at least an additional billion years? It takes a bit of time for solar systems to form.
garrettducat 2 years ago
Cosmology(.)com
Thank yuou for your comment "Garrett." This video is part of a series on this subject. A detailed, scholarly article that provides additional facts in support of this video, can be read for free at the Cosmology website. The title: Life on Earth Came From Other Planets."
There are other articles and videos on this subject which can also be found at:
Cosmology(.)com
Sarastarlight 2 years ago
I re-read my comment and it sounded asinine. I didn't mean it to be. I will definitely read up on it.
Thank you for being curteous enough to give a respectable reply, instead of saying something like "ur an idoit!!!1" which is so common on this thing we call YouTube.
garrettducat 2 years ago
Hi there, I am wondering what you're thoughts are on the origins of the life forms that created life on earth. How were they initially created? I guess that opens up a bigger question on how anything was created. It's the human condition to seek this knowledge I believe.
youjerkass 2 years ago
Cosmology. com
Thank you for your comment "you." Perhaps it is possible that life began on an ancient world whose chemistry is completely unlike that of Earth. Beyond that, we can only speculate about ultimate origins, and this includes wondering if perhaps life has no beginning, if life is eternal... or perhaps DNA-based carbon life is the waste product of some non-DNA non-Carbon entity, which, to put it crudely, digests certain substances and defecates living molecules--we can only speculate.
Sarastarlight 2 years ago
Those are great theories. Very interesting. What are your thoughts on the creation on non living matter? Planets, gases, etc? The big bang theory explains it only so far, but what was there before the bang, what triggered the bang, and how was matter developed from nothing? I'm sure you don't have the answers but your educated theories would be interesting to hear! Thank you for the response!
youjerkass 2 years ago
If panspermia is correct, why are there some bacteria with left and some with right hand amino acids? Life can only have one kind of amino acid chain, so if life came from space it had already picked a type of amino acids. Left and Right handed amino acids are incompatible and a creature can't change. Life can't have both unless it starts with the option, and theres no selection pressure either way. Are you saying that both classes of life traveled through space? Hmmmmmm
ariuszarim 2 years ago
how many years we been here? and learn soooooooooo much i meen we know everything about whats around us just not what we dont see and other planets if we still here in 200 years we will know everything or at least what we need to know to prove half these jokers deniyin more then us when they know sh1t them self but this is alot more evidence then them sayin no no no. event ended!
imarockslayer 2 years ago
but lived on moon for years and moon is the closest to us out of trilions on planets and suns out there. also no beginning? thats impossible a fact of life it started somewhere thats like sayin we been here for ever but its not true so there was a beginning to everything even the planets and there is a end to everything that also a fact. there is more then us much more better maybe as they have better resorces or been here alot longer one the two there is more this proves it
imarockslayer 2 years ago
all sorry what a load of beep! 1st many say no? yes no there no god. we did come from else where there is no other possible sulotion as there was alot more before earth was born! also no earth didnt make it preg lmao its just the fossels from another planet could live on earth and makes us like if u watch part 4 its facts a fossle lived on moon and died 2000 degs higher and lower we bring it to earth and it came alive omg where did we come from? another planet billions away that went super
imarockslayer 2 years ago
there is no beginnig without god,,
God is the only explanation,
i don't believe that human being exist out of bacteria,, everything thet you see is a gift from god and mankind is valuable.
and we can go nowhere becuse earth is ours home..
pohan19 2 years ago
if u want to see gods "gift" go to Africa you will see TONS of gods love there.
WINTHEWAR124 2 years ago
Well we sure made it to the moon...
Locust59 2 years ago
There is no god o.o
charliboy15 2 years ago
god did not make anything at all like eddy said no beginning
Halo3flood 2 years ago
Comment removed
cartonhead 2 years ago
So the first life on our planet surviveed the cataclysm that destroyed thier planet. Then flung thru the vaccum of space for however many light years away and then gets incenarted in our atmosphere crashed into our planet and probably purlvarized w/e rock they were on and somehow. This has never happened again. Meaning that Never has another meteorite carried an alien life form to our planet. Why would you think this is a plausible theory. God is the only explanation.
8Thirst 2 years ago
he is fking saying that a star is god -_- dude i don't beleive this shit
caguppy123 2 years ago
i got a boner
77ukpunk 2 years ago
sounds about right to me
firthparkkk 2 years ago
OOoooOOOOo... Galactic Spermies!!!! You pregnant now Earth.
cqtms 2 years ago
or is it the other way? galactic eggs earth makes you pregnant O_O
caguppy123 2 years ago
que monte de merda! pqp
potrixbr 2 years ago
omg we came from rocks
tmeng87 2 years ago
Cosmology(.)com - Cosmology(.)com
For more information we invite all viewers to visit our website: Cosmology
Cosmology(.)com - Cosmology(.)com
Sarastarlight 2 years ago
what about the 1st microbes in the universe?
Chase7856 2 years ago
There was no beginning :)
EddyMcK 2 years ago
yay im an alien
Dinobot2468 2 years ago
Well, technically you're right.
DestroyOrBeDestroyed 2 years ago
YAY
gkdlek523 2 years ago
so that proves there is life then other then earth?
:O interesting. Thanks for the response
KronicDemon442 2 years ago
yes yes yes!
Finally a scientific explanation of our origin!
Great work!
I knew about the experiments about the limits of survival among microbes - they can survive more than 1000 times more G-force shock than humans. This fact only means they are the ultimate cosmonauts.
Will you continue to post things like this?
kaotik1981 2 years ago
there are cool t shirts about all this stuff at 2012 tease, a web place.
sallyidea 2 years ago
so "ALIENS" are microbes?
and thats why they say we came from aliens?
Rojcam12 2 years ago
lol
gkdlek523 2 years ago
wrong!
there is no ort belt its all called the kiser belt it
looks that this man is purposely repleting the same information in similar tone which is a current hypnosis technique
another thing "THE HAND OF GOD" is not a logical explanation that's just retarded
darkLORDofFAT 2 years ago
it IS possible for life to be created through non - life. just because there wasnt a person sitting there watching happen and documenting it, doesnt mean its simply impossible. the universe its about 14 billion years old and to big for any human to comprehend. there is a lot of time and space in which life could have been created. from OUR experince, we havnt seen it happen, but its obvious that at somepoint it DID happen or we wouldnt be having this conversation.
jumpsx14 2 years ago
A lot of the claims this guy makes are completely unsupported scientifically. The eternal universe model hasn't been applicable since the discovery of cosmic expansion. He also seems to so blatantly disregard the well founded theory of energy conservation, if I'm hearing him right when he talks about stars continuously blowing up to make new stars. There's more than a few problems with that idea...
A lot of what he says is supported, but his understanding seems to be a bit... eccentric.
Cosmodot256 2 years ago
Yeah... lets just attribute everything we don't presently completely understand to Jesus like people have been doing for the last 2000 years and getting NOWHERE!
While others have taken it upon themselves to advance our knowledge of the world by studying the world and getting real and provable answers from NATURE...
It's almost too simple... And keep in mind that if something doesn't make any sense, it's probably because you don't understand it.
Cosmodot256 2 years ago
at some point, we all think universe had to be created. I know, most of that goes beyond our imagination... but the answer is very easy:
If life came to earth from other planets and chemicals formed life and... bla... at some point it had to start. So something thats ABOVE that all, something thats greater and bigger than the whole universe and thats even smart enought to do all these things had to create the universe... and us at least. till now noone could create life vom chemicals. just 1.
BacoFleet 2 years ago
saying that there is somebody or something out there that created life because nothing else makes sense, makes just a little sense. because then, who created who ever created us? and dont say he always has been and always will be, becuase that is just taking logic out of the picture completely. dont say that He is above logic and our understanding becuase that is just a cover up, a different way of saying " ok this doesnt make any sense either, but i dont want to admit it."
jumpsx14 2 years ago
leviallen27 chemicals are all over the universe its the matter that creates the universe life had to be created by matter from matter that already existed, probably from a meteor or a planet
jsan130 2 years ago
then when was dna ever created???
maxphilly 2 years ago
from the universe... the chemicals are floating around our solar system and are on planets and in the meteores that are said to have brought life to our planet
jsan130 2 years ago
yeh but were did the univeres come from.... if the big band... were did the big bang come from?
Tawarf91 2 years ago 2
i could say the EXACT same thing, only i could say the big bang created the unviverse, and if u say God, then were did God come from? ur just adding a step to the inveitable conclusion.... we have absolutely no fucking idea how the hell anyhting ever got done in the unviverse. the idea of God is just as irrational as the big bang, or a giant hippo for that matter. argueing is senseless, beacause we dont have the slightest clue.
jumpsx14 2 years ago
but... giant hippos are to awsome to not be real!!
Tawarf91 2 years ago
ok, see the bug problem with the big bang is still a theory. no one knows how god was created, he just is. same thing with the big bang theory. they don't know what started the universe other than it just did. our minds can't comprehend certain things because the information is not all their yet for us to see. once we find the information from where ever it is out there, then we'll know.
clone1918 2 years ago
exactly, i think we might be arguing the same point here, the chances of God creating the unvierse are identical to the big bang theory, since we have little to no solid evidence for either. by that note, the afore mentioned giant hippo creating the universe is just as likely. until god himself comes down and reveals himself to the entire world, then nobody knosFOR SURE he did it, same goes for the big bang, until we have solid evidence, we will never kno. i personally think the hippo did it tho
jumpsx14 2 years ago
i agree that life came from other planets but that life had to originate from somewhere else. the first life form had to be created by non- life because life cant come from a life form that doesn't exist. either a higher being created life (which i doubt) or life came to be through random chemical reactions.
jsan130 2 years ago
perfectly put
bunkmasterflex 2 years ago
how in the hell did microorganizms survive the atmosphere and intense temeratures like a fireball
bunkmasterflex 2 years ago
because they are awsome!
Tawarf91 2 years ago
WAT aliens i love ot kill a alien DUDE
SkiPpEr1561 2 years ago
I personally believe Earths life began on Earth.
It is possible that it came from another planet, but either way you first have to discover how it began in the first place.
it's easier to say for the sake of argument that it began here and then try to work out how it would have begun, if you see what i mean.
The1stPoster 2 years ago
My thoughts exactly.
mindreader1975 2 years ago
Yeah, I hate people saying life came from other planets, but then I was like, how would it get there in the first place. I agree with you and mindreader1975 100%.
LeetCopter 2 years ago
and it turn out miraculously we are doing fine now so our God(alien) appears as Zeus to lead and tell us to do things well and starts to reveal themselves slowly (that explains the close encounters at modern age) as we develop to be more wiser each day~
holyvin 2 years ago
wow dude backup and be careful with that... "aliens" there could be demons man so be careful how you say things like that
minime00 2 years ago
Comment removed
holyvin 2 years ago
we are just an imperfect experiment thrown by our gods(aliens) like the zergs thrown by the Xel Naga
holyvin 2 years ago
I know that every body finds bacteria and small stuff, but i want someone to find advanced stuff like us. There probily is its just out of our solar system and we will never get to it :(
911MEGABOB 2 years ago
Coyotendkm can u plz explain or prove evolution.its always the thories of evolution not the facts,and even the founders of this theory in their late books accept the fact. anyway i have no problem with bactria crusing through the space(lucky bec). ITs only the One who does it all with his great knowledge.
ummer143 2 years ago
In Proper scientific language you dont talk about facts, just theories.
Our theories for how elecricity works are still just theories but seem to work well enough for you to be on your computer right now. One day someone may have a break through that changes the theory and we will have even more complicated devicees.
My point is religion will give you facts and wont change them if they dont fit reality, but science gives you theories that change as our understanding of the universe changes.
Silentsam7532 2 years ago
evolution has been seen taking action in the last century. during the industrial revolution in Britan a type of white moth would land on the soot covered trees an be eaten by birds. the moths that had the genetic mutation of a few dark spots where lees likely to be seen and passed down that gene to their offspring. now there are no more white moths in that area, just black/brown ones. and they are the same species. Evolution= random mutation + natural selection/ survival of the fittest.
cqtms 2 years ago
Is it possible that bacterial life didn't form in ancient planetary oceans and pools, as once thought, but instead formed in space itself, inside of comets or some other non-planetary space debris? It may be a naturally occurring process, like the formation of stars. When the conditions are right, stars form. Maybe the same is true for single celled life and viruses. And from where it forms, it rains down on planets, and then continues to evolve there.
coyotedkm 2 years ago
look up plz
ummer143 2 years ago
It does make you wonder what process started life. It makes sense that the first planets may not have had life.
I doubt there was some pool or acids that started it for the whole universe, the idea of a type of comet isnt a bad start to finding other types of places that could start the process.
Silentsam7532 2 years ago