Added: 2 years ago
From: Jojoairbus
Views: 12,878
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (54)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • this plane is awesome,, had it for 3 months now and it is amazing!

  • hey dude its kind of weird where on the airspeed indicator it reads 240 while the arrow is pointing at some where between 140-150

  • I like this!

  • No night lighting in engineers panel :/

  • ur out of memory

  • Hey nice video. Is the plane GOOD on frames?

  • so how com my auto pilot and auto throttle is not working I haveV1.20 do I have to buy fsuipc so call dowson 4.60

  • Very nice panel. But the Boeing callouts bugs me.

  • everything a bit dark but cool video

  • nice head track ir

  • why no ground contact alarm on the day time approach?

    Excellent work though :)

  • does it have a GPS? if it does is it the 500 or the other?

  • Aerosoft Airbus X would make airsimmer airbus look like a joke :-D great vid!

  • @gokumalo This is not an airbus X this is an a300! That does not anything to do with it.

  • also there must be something with your joystick deadzone - as you dont get full reverse - just a bit ;)

  • Really? I have the Saitek X52.

  • btw: you didnt install the font for the INS digits :)

  • I know, I have fixed it now! :-)

    But almost everybody has this problem with the installer. It doesn´t install the font for the INS.

    I really like the support from you at aerosoft´s forum. Just downloaded the font and installed it.

  • uhm Boeing Callouts??^^

  • yes, airbus used the same system - before they used their own callouts on the a320 and up (from 1989 on)

  • ahhh ok good to know(im boeing fan normally so i didnt really know xD)thx

  • i entirely share your viewpoint : here is what i roll with PMDG JS41 747 MD11, 767 LVLD, MD80 leonardo SH, super80 classic and pro, Fokker DA. im looking for a nice plane i think the A300 would do great.

  • even better than the wilco's air simmer etcccc?

  • Airsimmer isn´t released yet for FSX. And the Basic package for FS2004 has lot´s of bugs. Maybe in one year they release the Advanced version. I´m very disappointed with Airsimmer, and that are many other ones, too. I have myself the Airbus Series Volume 1 from Wilco, and I don´t like it that much, because the autopilot and the Flybywire system don´t work properly and exactly. Look at PMDG´s autopilot. It keeps you exactly in the badest weather condition e.g. on the ILS.

  • got it but whats your average in % for this addon

  • I´m sorry but that´s hard to say for me.

    But one thing is sure, it´s the best Airbus for FSX which has ever been developed yet.

  • what do you mean?

  • E.g. the Inertial Navigation System INS isnt´t completely simulated. Or it hasn´t adjustable dimmable lights, that are all little things what I like very much on the PMDG aircrafts.

  • i mean when someone say its 90 or 95% clickable you know its (as a general rule) an aircraft with deep systems simulated. is that the case for this addon

  • I think so, but I also have to say that you don´t have to expect a simulation quality and system depth like PMDG it has.

  • i guess its pretty normal to wanna know what is in the product before buying it. you know, an aircraft with nothing in it like the 757 captainsim. i like addons with functionnals systems. thats all

  • I mean the percentage... :D

    I like functional systems too!

    PMDG xD

  • plus i see that there is a panel which is dark like a Wx radar. is that it? i guess its not working but can we add the Wx radar from reality XP?

  • Somebody already asked this in the forum, but to add the weather radar from realitiy doesn´t work...

  • thats what i thought anyway thank you very much for replying. but one more question is there a mechanical panel? is it 90 OR 95 % clickable like the overhead

  • You can see the mechanical panel at 0:53 and it is 90% clickable...

    Serious, I don´t know how many percent are exactly clickable, how shall I tell you that? xD It´s just a guess. But why do you want to know it so exactly???

  • but how do enter sid or star as you dont know which rwy is in use at arrival airport

  • Then you have to enter them manually.

    If you plan your approach in flight you have to inform you at cruise which runway at you destination is in use, most SID´s and STARS are made with VOR´s and NDB´s with flying on a radial, so you don´t have to feed up the INS with coordinates.

  • are the mechanical and overhead panel fully clickable or close to 90% usable

  • I would say 95% are clickable.

  • hello ! i would like to buy the plane but i want to know if there is some bugs? and second: how do fly SID and STAR without fmc and nd? unless you enter each star and sid coordonates in the ins. THANKS

  • Hi, there are no significant bugs and they will be fixed with an update. You can ipmort e.g. flightplans from FSC or FSX to the INS, so you don´t have to fill the system with each coordinate of the SID or STAR.

  • it's a cool video...

    5*****

    good bye

  • sweet!

  • You are only doing VC nothing from outside...

    Tks alot though : )

  • I think I will make a second video to show you and all here the whole aircraft. This plane is really awesome! :D

  • fs2004?

  • FSX

  • Fantastic! ;D

    5*

  • Comment removed

  • nice. 5 stars :)

  • whoah

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more