well the pictures would be mostly handled by the sweet graphics cards they have installed, the film was only 700mb, not a whole dvd film and who can afford to do this in a home setup? but fair play, they made their marketing material iinteresting in the end.
You guys seriously think this guy doesn't know not to defrag an SSD? It's not his own personal rig, why not beat the snot out of it and test stuff you wouldn't normally test.
The speed of raid 0 significantly drops off after 3 drives. First you may get a 100% boost, then 50, then 25, and then it keeps cutting in half from there.
@masterchief3k Yeah, the added speed benefit of the drives drops off at 1/n. So at 2 you get 1, then at 3, 1/2 and at 4, 1/4th. Adding a 25th drive for example would increase the speed a whopping 1/16777216. -- I would only do 4 drives for binary reasons and stop. The added 1/16th increase you get with the remaining drives isn't worth the 20 * ~ $200 bucks you're spending.
btw, you should not run defrag on SSDs.. oh and I want to call myself IT genius too... and dye my hair blue and nickname myself blueice or something...
With 24 SSD's you run into IDE bottlenecks. If they hit 2GB/sec then they're actually only using about 10-12 of them and the rest could be taken off. It wouldn't should so impressive but that's reality.
next time, try to RAID 25 Corsair Force GT 240GB SSD or Kingstom HyperX 240GB SSD. that would be more faster than samsung SSD. and do a boot with WIN8! that boots only a 2 seconds w/o BIOS! haha
@EXTDubstep cause that computer is custom made...a mac pro can go higher than 2tb of space on a ssd drive BUT mac doesnt need to build a machine like that because no one will buy it.
@Blasphemer1911 Doh - he was just showing how fast the disks were accessed, as defragging a normal drive takes a long time. He didn't do it because the SSDs needed to be defragged...
@Stabby666 Oh come on, there are much better ways to show off the systems speed. Where is the point in doing something useless? Even if it is fast, it's still useless.
@Blasphemer1911 Er, it was done for fun - most of these demos of hardware speed are useless for any practical application. I could show my rig running 4 different FPS games all at once - it'll look impressive and show how fast it is, but it's not something that has any real purpose. Stop trying to bring everyone down with your negativity - if you can do better post a video.
but i think its preaty nice idea for make raid on "PC" to make raid of SSD ..for somebody who "LIVE" in computer ..got big start up. use ps cs3, fraps, launch new high quality games, got 100 open page in browser, dual screen or more, lanuch 10 standard programs like skype msn iso image 2 games in bacground...why not? .. but yes.. 24 is just for benchmark..user's dont need so mach speed "AT THE TIME :) "
but..i will be happy for meet 2 high speed SSD in my new notebook. (even 1 :P)
Kill that bastard for hurting those ssd by defragging them. IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE EITHER? Wow he got some knowledge about how to set up a raid and defrags them? wtf
@Tunesmaster709 No it cannot. 10 GigaBIT not bytes. You'd have to divide it with 8 to see the speed of Thunderbolt. Also it has pretty much nothing to do with what the SSD can do. And the cost of a thunderbolt harddrive is above that of a solid state disk. Not much to win on that point.
@fanmanabc Probably, but with just the on-board sata ports it should exceed 2gb's don't you think? unless it uses sata II or those ssd's don't have a very good performance. To be able to be a bit sure about what it really is the bottleneck i guess this guy should supply the model of the m/b and the ssd's. But it really may be pci cutting it off.
@WXIIIR well sata2 and sata3 are rated for 3 & 6 gb/s respectively, but no where has anyone ever gotten near that for actual transfer speeds. theoretically ~500mb/s x 24 (raid0) would equal 12gb/s but the processor, mobo, ssd drivers, raid cards all limit the speed. How often do you see anything near the rated speeds? (when it comes to transfer speeds)
@fanmanabc the sata2 and 3 are rated for gigabits, not gigabytes, sata 2 and 3 can actually perform at the rated speed, a very fast ssd will fully saturate a sata 2 port. Also 500mb/s is a very good ssd, cheap ssd's will have 100 to 200mb/s. But you are right a lot of stuff doesn't get to the rated speeds. If this guys says what the motherboard and the ssd's we could probably get to some conclusion.
@WXIIIR gb/s is gigabits. I guess i used it to represent gigabytes as well. Sorry, what i meant to say was "12 GBps". Anyways, 12 GBps is far off from 18.5 BGps. Losing a lot of data bandwidth. 500 mb/s is typical for sata3 and 100-200 mb/s is typical for sata2.
holy shit 800 MHz what would happen if it had the new 2300 MHz AND IT HAS VISTA!!! WHAT WOuld happen with 8 core CPU 4.0 GHZ 2300 MHz of raM and 16 GB of RAM
Congrats, I believe you don't need ram. And I believe your ram slows down your computer. Because everything is loads thought/from ram (games etc). But I bet you can copy files really fast :D
@hgangster13 SSD's don't have seek times like spinning HDD's, so you don't have to defrag them to optimize where things are. Likewise, defragging simply causes more writes to them (as it relocates files), which just makes it wear out faster. Win 7 automatically turns off defrag on detected SSD's, b/c it's not necessary. So, this guy running defrag on the drives is ... well, it's lulz-worthy.
@therandomdot not only that, SSDs rely on "random-ness" for their speed. by defragging the SSDs, and organizing the files, you are in fact doing more harm. no good in defragging SSDs
@rajah010203 You don't need to defrag SSDs as they have no seek time so it's pointless. Normal hard disks are physical devices and so it's faster if the data can be read sequentially from the platter.
@ryley92 Not quite true. The TRIM on them will only effect them if they have more than a certain amount written to them in a short time. This will reduce the speeds in the short term but that will recover over time.
@Astro247z meh guess what? RAM is just a cache for the cpu. things arent stored in specific files in ram. There just plopped in there and just float around until the cpu needs to use it again
not bad considering my 10 year old dual xeon gelatin 3.2ghz with lsi raid card on a pci 133 and two samsung spinpoint 250gb in raid copy the same thing in about 29 second in linux unfortunately i would run out of memory fast loading all them apps so cant test that lol Point is to still have to go to them extremes 10 years later to speed up by 28 seconds and £XXX well that is telling us something really. I think were getting riped off somewhere down the line
Omfg.. Watching u defrag the SSD's made me wanna slap u silly.. Defragging an SSD can in worst case scenario make the disk crash. Please people DO NOT DEFRAG YOUR SSD'S AFTER WATCHING THIS!
I though there is 1024MB in 1GB, 1024x2=2048MB in 2GB, they only got 2018MB, so they was off by 30MB/s, therefore you have not broken the 2GB/s speed lol. Still, a good speed to have ;)
@TechBiteReviews There's 1000 Megabytes in 1 Gigabyte. There's 1024 Mebibytes in 1 Gibibyte. Usually people talk about Gigabytes, not Gibibytes, although Windows uses Mebibytes and Gibibytes.
@bananavice I may be 15 but iv been doing computers for years, 1024MB in 1GB, even Google's calculator is on my side. So what now? you gonna argue with Google's calculator even though it has been coded by professionals that probably know more about computers then anyone on YouTube, ayy? Here, heres the link to a screen shot I took of the page a few seconds ago, you may not look at it but others can :D
@TechBiteReviews I really do think you are missing the point of bananavice's comment. He's more right than you in that he's saying that, although 1GB is often used to refer to BOTH 1000MB and 1024MiB technically, it's only true of the first as the term for the second SHOULD be 1GiB. I know that many places will refer to a GiB as a GB, and yes, that includes the mighty Google God, but it's wrong.
@TechBiteReviews What we're arguing on is pointless semantics, and yes, google is technically wrong (the best kind of wrong) on this issue. Giga- is a well-used prefix which means 1 billion. Today it is often used when what is really meant is Gibi-, a prefix specifically formed for technology use where it means 1024^3, or 1024 Mebi-, and there's no problem with that. My point is not that GB only means 1000 (it's used for both), my point is that GB CAN mean 1000.
I like the industry standard trampoline test.
Way to go, Paul!
robertfox05 35 minutes ago
well the pictures would be mostly handled by the sweet graphics cards they have installed, the film was only 700mb, not a whole dvd film and who can afford to do this in a home setup? but fair play, they made their marketing material iinteresting in the end.
ReflexiveBeef 2 days ago
You must format your RAM after defragging your SSD's for a better performance...xD
Bazrami6 4 days ago 2
You guys seriously think this guy doesn't know not to defrag an SSD? It's not his own personal rig, why not beat the snot out of it and test stuff you wouldn't normally test.
malkowskitube 4 days ago
Stop defragging that shit :'(
AsciaBipenne 4 days ago
Really good IT genius. You're never supposed to defrag an SSD.
alexbarton666 4 days ago 2
Defrag? I read, you shouldn't do it on SSD?
c046587 5 days ago 2
One does not simply defrag an SSD! *B0r0m1r*
W7TipsAndTricks100 5 days ago 3
you could now put 3 vertex 3's for example (sorry OCZ haters) and acheive similar performance.
masterchief3k 6 days ago
The speed of raid 0 significantly drops off after 3 drives. First you may get a 100% boost, then 50, then 25, and then it keeps cutting in half from there.
masterchief3k 6 days ago
@masterchief3k Yeah, the added speed benefit of the drives drops off at 1/n. So at 2 you get 1, then at 3, 1/2 and at 4, 1/4th. Adding a 25th drive for example would increase the speed a whopping 1/16777216. -- I would only do 4 drives for binary reasons and stop. The added 1/16th increase you get with the remaining drives isn't worth the 20 * ~ $200 bucks you're spending.
Really it's 1/16 - 1/(8 million) or so. But, it's largely irrelevant.
Also, way to defrag.
Tatarize 3 days ago
Wow. nice job defragging 24 ssds LOL. Might as well toss them out the window too.
LandonHeat 6 days ago
Failboat sails, defragging ssd's
ChipsAhoyCA 6 days ago
This approach will definitely be very good for video editors.
5904454 1 week ago
Build time 24 hours? I can do that in 8!
flexyco 1 week ago
Thats very nice work! But why red hair??
turbojohnyS 1 week ago
why would you use vista? how old is this video?
Designandrew 1 week ago
dislike for can't afford one SSD... oh shit, i pressed like already
ngflycloud 1 week ago 2
Someone should do this with 24 RevoDrives (best version is at 1500MBps r/w) :3
jensi18 1 week ago
@jensi18 You do realize that RevoDrives use PCI-E interface, thus you can't really put 24 of them in one PC, right?
shigalbigal 1 week ago
@shigalbigal Yeeea, it came to mind after posting :P But if it was possible, omg!
jensi18 1 week ago
@jensi18 Yeah, it sure would of been one hell of a speed!
shigalbigal 1 week ago
This, and a 1GB per second internet connection, equals the worlds fastest super computer x2
themarcrobertson 1 week ago
Wow you can Load ur porn faster now
BiblyMC 1 week ago
but will it blend?
vafles 1 week ago
What Mobo is that? it has 2 CPU's as a socket 775? lolwut?
FastBuffGaming 2 weeks ago
@FastBuffGaming LGA 771 actually, and its an Intel Skulltrail dual CPU workstation board.
FEAR6655 1 week ago
@FEAR6655 Thanks :3
FastBuffGaming 1 week ago
This video is a little old, they used DDR2 Ram and Windows Vista
Today this shit could be even faster
GameT42 2 weeks ago
i bet vista still took 5 minutes to boot.
yurgrandma 2 weeks ago 26
that´s some crzy shit
frederic128 2 weeks ago
These Hard Drives maintains virginity around the world even those who are in their late 20's I see.
Nettikturbo 2 weeks ago
@Nettikturbo So they worked for you so far then?
cassius969 2 weeks ago
@cassius969 Hehe, nah the trick is to get married THEN pick up that kind of hobby :D
Nettikturbo 2 weeks ago
Why would you defrag SSDs?
Grippen98 2 weeks ago
You should have put up an accent warning instead.
cassius969 2 weeks ago
Next project? Two words, RAM Drive.
adracamas 2 weeks ago
why don´t you use 48 ssd`s with a SATA III interface and configure them in raid 0?
speedcubie 2 weeks ago
btw, you should not run defrag on SSDs.. oh and I want to call myself IT genius too... and dye my hair blue and nickname myself blueice or something...
SophosVII 2 weeks ago
With 24 SSD's you run into IDE bottlenecks. If they hit 2GB/sec then they're actually only using about 10-12 of them and the rest could be taken off. It wouldn't should so impressive but that's reality.
SquirrelFromGradLife 2 weeks ago
I was hoping for a bluescreen.
VIJUMPMANIV 3 weeks ago
2:46 - I thought De-fragging SSD's kills them/lowers their life span...
AnarchyEngineer 3 weeks ago 4
love this video :-)
the song is "data storage thing" from Hibbett's Superstore by MJ Hibbett: mjhibbett.bandcamp.com/track/data-storage-thing
tillring2 3 weeks ago
To hell with 3 way sli im going with 3 way raid controllers.
danthemanzizle 3 weeks ago
0:01 - Samsung offered you a lot of money to rig a test?
mubd1234 3 weeks ago
0:40 We happy Vincent?
SolidlyStated 3 weeks ago
One thing, get a server tower that is actually meant for a huge stack of HD's, they still get hot, and heat causes failure eventually.
mythril4 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
next time, try to RAID 25 Corsair Force GT 240GB SSD or Kingstom HyperX 240GB SSD. that would be more faster than samsung SSD. and do a boot with WIN8! that boots only a 2 seconds w/o BIOS! haha
gelomination231 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
gelomination231 3 weeks ago
Thumbs up for defragging an SSD. No, seriously, I laughed, HARD.
fuzzayboy 3 weeks ago 82
@fuzzayboy I thought the exact same thing lol, Since when do SSD's need to be defragged? xD
Infernoxv8 3 weeks ago 2
I love how VB still takes forever to load XD
xcommando2 3 weeks ago
in this video: An ad team has too much money, and wonders how to spend it.
InternetLad 4 weeks ago
Xaaxaxa what i was looking was 2 cpus . Not an qx9775 in doesn't support dual cpu
Tsinepanos 4 weeks ago
why the fuck are you using 800 mhz ram?
aulum987 1 month ago
@aulum987
propebly motherboard support that SSD's... but not supporost fastest mhz ram?
i dont test it or saw on site... but..they use highly new technology so im sure they think about that
Andrew162x 4 weeks ago
my ramdisk beat you 3174 MB/s read 3496 MB/s write
johnguitarist1 1 month ago
@johnguitarist1
F your ram ;) can you launch so many programs in such a short time? ;)
Andrew162x 4 weeks ago
@Andrew162x hahaha i cant even fit them :P
johnguitarist1 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
johnguitarist1 1 month ago
Yeah that's right, defrag those SSD's it's going to make them super fast!
YbrFinX 1 month ago
How can that computer use 24 SSDs when a Mac Pro can only go up to 2 TB of space on an SSD?
EXTDubstep 1 month ago
@EXTDubstep cause mac is shit !!!
Psycho2k22 1 month ago 2
@EXTDubstep
*cough* macs *cough*
rossidude 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
@EXTDubstep cause that computer is custom made...a mac pro can go higher than 2tb of space on a ssd drive BUT mac doesnt need to build a machine like that because no one will buy it.
Ragetemplar1 1 month ago
Comment removed
fartinthewind13 1 month ago in playlist Computers
saw Paint.NET in there.....yay!
Surannhealz 1 month ago
Comment removed
klemen918 1 month ago
what is raid and what the hell is this about ?
OpticJBigBalls 1 month ago
@OpticJBigBalls Why the hell are you watching it if you don't even know what it's about? Fucking n00b.
ksbnr1 1 month ago
@OpticJBigBalls
Try not being an idiot. If you don't understand this video, google RAID.
rossidude 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
why do you need the fire extingusher, anyway?
mackyclemen 1 month ago
@mackyclemen just incase his whole (powerful machine) setup caught fire or something, somehow like a power surge or something. lol
maxweston1 1 month ago
fakn seriouse.
xXiWHITEXx 1 month ago
SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY!
bawenang 1 month ago
Defraging an SSD makes no sense... Actually it's bad to defrag them ;)
Blasphemer1911 1 month ago
@Blasphemer1911 Doh - he was just showing how fast the disks were accessed, as defragging a normal drive takes a long time. He didn't do it because the SSDs needed to be defragged...
Stabby666 1 month ago
@Stabby666 Oh come on, there are much better ways to show off the systems speed. Where is the point in doing something useless? Even if it is fast, it's still useless.
Blasphemer1911 1 month ago
@Blasphemer1911 Er, it was done for fun - most of these demos of hardware speed are useless for any practical application. I could show my rig running 4 different FPS games all at once - it'll look impressive and show how fast it is, but it's not something that has any real purpose. Stop trying to bring everyone down with your negativity - if you can do better post a video.
Stabby666 1 month ago
@Stabby666
but i think its preaty nice idea for make raid on "PC" to make raid of SSD ..for somebody who "LIVE" in computer ..got big start up. use ps cs3, fraps, launch new high quality games, got 100 open page in browser, dual screen or more, lanuch 10 standard programs like skype msn iso image 2 games in bacground...why not? .. but yes.. 24 is just for benchmark..user's dont need so mach speed "AT THE TIME :) "
but..i will be happy for meet 2 high speed SSD in my new notebook. (even 1 :P)
Andrew162x 4 weeks ago
So...this will be for sale soon? LoL XD *drool*
nisnases 1 month ago
nerd party, lol nice
Tuplabotti 1 month ago
Hey, nice case, same as mine... well I have the full armour (full doors).
Youngie1337 1 month ago
*slides fire extinguisher into view* :D
if5103ii 1 month ago
Pretty cool, a little cheesy, but pretty cool nonetheless!
jortuno2k 1 month ago
This video really made my day awesome!
Jette3 1 month ago
Just a bottleneck on your internet connection then?
Cheeseman1080 1 month ago 26
Near the beginning of the video, the ding-tick-tick-tick music, isn't that from Super Mario RPG?
lemond2007 1 month ago
WTF its "Window Vista"
MobileIntelGaming 1 month ago
@MobileIntelGaming well such a good system and then raping it with vista...
GeoStreber 1 month ago
Comment removed
MobileIntelGaming 1 month ago
Kill that bastard for hurting those ssd by defragging them. IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE EITHER? Wow he got some knowledge about how to set up a raid and defrags them? wtf
haxti 1 month ago
hehe my mac's thunderbolt can go 10 gbs
Tunesmaster709 1 month ago
@Tunesmaster709 No it cannot. 10 GigaBIT not bytes. You'd have to divide it with 8 to see the speed of Thunderbolt. Also it has pretty much nothing to do with what the SSD can do. And the cost of a thunderbolt harddrive is above that of a solid state disk. Not much to win on that point.
Marcianow 1 month ago
@Marcianow oh really t i thought bit and byte were the same aha thanks!!! and i wasnt trying to win a argument
Tunesmaster709 1 month ago
never defrag ssd's it will shorten life
AlexWoellhaf 1 month ago
STEAM
wyattutz 1 month ago
BAD COMPUTER!
4500intelx 1 month ago
I saw this video years ago. Way to steal it dumb fuck.
philip21786 1 month ago
Why not use Windows 95 next time?
nitroray 1 month ago 31
@nitroray why not Windows 3.1 ?
MrCesarVideo1 3 weeks ago
This is fucking epic!!
billybifocals 1 month ago
Even if it will look pretty big and maybe messy, I want this. So badly.
iSeiranai 1 month ago
But...Will it blend?
Th3StrandManHD 1 month ago
@Th3StrandManHD it´s 2012
queenzortje 1 month ago
does it need it's own powerplant?
MrSpaceman8774 1 month ago
@MrSpaceman8774 no , ssd's are very energy efficient .
carlover 1 month ago
for 24 SSD raid, was expecting more. a bottleneck was definitively hit in this video
fanmanabc 1 month ago
@fanmanabc For sure, any theories?
WXIIIR 1 month ago
@WXIIIR the bottleneck was prob due to the motherboard. the pci raid cards can only transfer so much through the slots.
fanmanabc 1 month ago
@fanmanabc Probably, but with just the on-board sata ports it should exceed 2gb's don't you think? unless it uses sata II or those ssd's don't have a very good performance. To be able to be a bit sure about what it really is the bottleneck i guess this guy should supply the model of the m/b and the ssd's. But it really may be pci cutting it off.
WXIIIR 1 month ago
@WXIIIR well sata2 and sata3 are rated for 3 & 6 gb/s respectively, but no where has anyone ever gotten near that for actual transfer speeds. theoretically ~500mb/s x 24 (raid0) would equal 12gb/s but the processor, mobo, ssd drivers, raid cards all limit the speed. How often do you see anything near the rated speeds? (when it comes to transfer speeds)
fanmanabc 1 month ago
@fanmanabc the sata2 and 3 are rated for gigabits, not gigabytes, sata 2 and 3 can actually perform at the rated speed, a very fast ssd will fully saturate a sata 2 port. Also 500mb/s is a very good ssd, cheap ssd's will have 100 to 200mb/s. But you are right a lot of stuff doesn't get to the rated speeds. If this guys says what the motherboard and the ssd's we could probably get to some conclusion.
WXIIIR 1 month ago
@WXIIIR gb/s is gigabits. I guess i used it to represent gigabytes as well. Sorry, what i meant to say was "12 GBps". Anyways, 12 GBps is far off from 18.5 BGps. Losing a lot of data bandwidth. 500 mb/s is typical for sata3 and 100-200 mb/s is typical for sata2.
fanmanabc 1 month ago
the tiltle says 24 SSDs but the part list says 26 ???
MYKEELOCC 1 month ago
WTF ARE YOU CRAZY?!
TheNiggiboy 1 month ago
fucking virgins
YooTubeCritc 1 month ago
now make a server with that
gdialpha 1 month ago
who says macs are the only computer that can open apps fast
gdialpha 1 month ago
that must be one expensive pc
gdialpha 1 month ago
holy shit 800 MHz what would happen if it had the new 2300 MHz AND IT HAS VISTA!!! WHAT WOuld happen with 8 core CPU 4.0 GHZ 2300 MHz of raM and 16 GB of RAM
TheGarbageGaming 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Congrats, I believe you don't need ram. And I believe your ram slows down your computer. Because everything is loads thought/from ram (games etc). But I bet you can copy files really fast :D
K0lsyr4 1 month ago
Comment removed
K0lsyr4 1 month ago
SSD Hard Disks? Yeah, right... Haven't heard of one like this yet.
pafkata90 1 month ago
If the grey aliens were watching you, they would be LOL.
xShotGUNxShoGUNx 1 month ago
He defrags the SSD... LOL!
therandomdot 1 month ago 89
@therandomdot im not so good with pc's but was is worse about that?
hgangster13 1 month ago
@hgangster13 SSD's don't have seek times like spinning HDD's, so you don't have to defrag them to optimize where things are. Likewise, defragging simply causes more writes to them (as it relocates files), which just makes it wear out faster. Win 7 automatically turns off defrag on detected SSD's, b/c it's not necessary. So, this guy running defrag on the drives is ... well, it's lulz-worthy.
therandomdot 1 month ago
@therandomdot not only that, SSDs rely on "random-ness" for their speed. by defragging the SSDs, and organizing the files, you are in fact doing more harm. no good in defragging SSDs
fanmanabc 1 month ago
@therandomdot What a... hahaha = ) Next time burn the SSD, more effective way to destroy.
benzill87 1 month ago
@therandomdot
plz tell me why you have not to defrag an ssd !
rajah010203 1 month ago
@rajah010203 You don't need to defrag SSDs as they have no seek time so it's pointless. Normal hard disks are physical devices and so it's faster if the data can be read sequentially from the platter.
Stabby666 1 month ago
@Stabby666
thank's :D
rajah010203 1 month ago
@therandomdot oh noo it takes away ~1week of uptime out of .. 6TB = 400 years?
bavrije 1 month ago
uhhh this video is old?
Nowadays write speeds are 2x.....
viper19861986 1 month ago
@viper19861986
Not to mention they used 4870x2 and two QX9775's, this is 2007/08 technology and I'm fairly certain the video is from around that time too.
eltocliousus 1 month ago
@eltocliousus ah didnt know it was THAT old, good point.
viper19861986 1 month ago
you ruined 24 ssds by running the defrag, they'll never be as fast as they could have been
ryley92 1 month ago
@ryley92 Not quite true. The TRIM on them will only effect them if they have more than a certain amount written to them in a short time. This will reduce the speeds in the short term but that will recover over time.
mu5hh34d 1 month ago
@mu5hh34d lol okay but either way you should never defrag an ssd
ryley92 1 month ago
fucking nerds.
zrimmeh 1 month ago
if you could sell that itd be worth like 20000$ lol
BaileysGaming 1 month ago
stealing peoples video
ivelocityi 1 month ago
I wish I had the money for that!
tino730 1 month ago
lol vista
billonicle 1 month ago
meh RAM is faster
Astro247z 1 month ago
@Astro247z meh guess what? RAM is just a cache for the cpu. things arent stored in specific files in ram. There just plopped in there and just float around until the cpu needs to use it again
Captainchiggs 1 month ago
@Captainchiggs i got 64gigs of ram an 12of it is used as an HDD
Astro247z 1 month ago
Id like to see this redone on 24 Crucial M4 512gb on a 8x pci raid card.
overclockedamd123 1 month ago
towering pillar of ssds
faqx123 1 month ago
Why does everyone keep repeating each other about defraging ssds? If one person said it thats enough
MrAMColes 1 month ago
It says 26 SSD's on the shopping list ......
maloney670 1 month ago
Buuuuuuut Will they Blend ????
maloney670 1 month ago 2
what the fuck
theagemon5 1 month ago
not bad considering my 10 year old dual xeon gelatin 3.2ghz with lsi raid card on a pci 133 and two samsung spinpoint 250gb in raid copy the same thing in about 29 second in linux unfortunately i would run out of memory fast loading all them apps so cant test that lol Point is to still have to go to them extremes 10 years later to speed up by 28 seconds and £XXX well that is telling us something really. I think were getting riped off somewhere down the line
f1r31c3r1 1 month ago
and its windows vista....
Lordgreece 1 month ago 66
@Lordgreece This video was originally from 09
vetselm 1 month ago
@Lordgreece Vista and 7 are basicly the same OS.
Vista = Windows Version 6.0
Windows 7 = Windows Version 6.1
ZytonicRecords 1 month ago
@ZytonicRecords uhm... no they really are not...... Operating Systems are more than just a number....
djteac 1 month ago
@ZytonicRecords
i know :D, te windows 7 is simply a updated Windows VIsta, and Windows Xp is 5.0
Lordgreece 1 month ago
@Lordgreece At least its not 98 or xp
wyattutz 1 month ago
@wyattutz
yeah :D
Lordgreece 1 month ago
2:46 I died. You don't defrag SSD's....
TheSnub 1 month ago 4
@TheSnub
It's supposed to show off the speed. You don't buy 24 SSDs either.
Edge0fPain 1 month ago 2
@Edge0fPain well its my money so I can buy a lot of 30 SSDs if I want....
vgamesx1 1 month ago
Wtf 2 cpus?
Dez13040287 1 month ago
Omfg.. Watching u defrag the SSD's made me wanna slap u silly.. Defragging an SSD can in worst case scenario make the disk crash. Please people DO NOT DEFRAG YOUR SSD'S AFTER WATCHING THIS!
drazticProductions 1 month ago
I though there is 1024MB in 1GB, 1024x2=2048MB in 2GB, they only got 2018MB, so they was off by 30MB/s, therefore you have not broken the 2GB/s speed lol. Still, a good speed to have ;)
TechBiteReviews 1 month ago
@TechBiteReviews There's 1000 Megabytes in 1 Gigabyte. There's 1024 Mebibytes in 1 Gibibyte. Usually people talk about Gigabytes, not Gibibytes, although Windows uses Mebibytes and Gibibytes.
bananavice 1 month ago
@bananavice I may be 15 but iv been doing computers for years, 1024MB in 1GB, even Google's calculator is on my side. So what now? you gonna argue with Google's calculator even though it has been coded by professionals that probably know more about computers then anyone on YouTube, ayy? Here, heres the link to a screen shot I took of the page a few seconds ago, you may not look at it but others can :D
And dont forget to subscribe to me :P
TechBiteReviews 1 month ago
@TechBiteReviews wont let me post the link :/ but check google yourself, put this 'megabytes in gigabyte'
TechBiteReviews 1 month ago
@TechBiteReviews I really do think you are missing the point of bananavice's comment. He's more right than you in that he's saying that, although 1GB is often used to refer to BOTH 1000MB and 1024MiB technically, it's only true of the first as the term for the second SHOULD be 1GiB. I know that many places will refer to a GiB as a GB, and yes, that includes the mighty Google God, but it's wrong.
mu5hh34d 1 month ago
@TechBiteReviews What we're arguing on is pointless semantics, and yes, google is technically wrong (the best kind of wrong) on this issue. Giga- is a well-used prefix which means 1 billion. Today it is often used when what is really meant is Gibi-, a prefix specifically formed for technology use where it means 1024^3, or 1024 Mebi-, and there's no problem with that. My point is not that GB only means 1000 (it's used for both), my point is that GB CAN mean 1000.
bananavice 1 month ago
@TechBiteReviews wait.. you've been doing computers? for years?? ewww!! seems like it would hurt..
vgamesx1