Why are you arguing with a lifeguard and preventing them from actually watching the waters. I would rather have them watch my kid then argue with you for filming them and they can arrest you for jepordizing public safety.
he came up to me in his golf cart, while I was walking down the beach, and told me I was doing something I wasn't supposed to be doing. That's when I started filming. Watch the rest of the playlist and read the accompanying comments, and you'll see where it goes. He left his station of his own volition to harass me about something I not only wasn't doing, but which would not have been against any law or regulation if I had been doing it.
In fact, it would have been Constitutionally protected behavior according to the Supreme Court, and is something hundreds of people do there every day without being harassed.
After somehow stumbling across a few of your videos, and becoming enthralled and checking a couple more, I can only say that you are wasting oxygen. Please save it for those who need it.
how is it fair to not let perverts that tape little kids and other sick shit film on the beach, yet let you film? do you see why it would've been better to just leave the camera at home?
I don't know what planet you're from, but in the USA the Supreme Court repeatedly has protected everyone's right under the first amendment to the Constitution ( that's the one that guarantees freedom of speech for all you ignorami ) to record audio and/or video of ANYTHING and EVERYTHING which occurs ANYWHERE that's both public and outdoors,
unless it is taking place in an area to which admission is restricted by having to pay an admission charge or present a ticket or security clearance in order to enter. A beach in a state park fits none of those criteria, therefore anyone attempting to inhibit my filming there is violating my Constitutional rights.
There are literally hundreds of people taking pictures on that beach every day, and nobody attempts to stop them. This includes parents photographing their own or their friends' kids.
The Constitution also guarantees "equal protection under the law". That means that if it's legal for one person to do something, it cannot be illegal for anyone else to do it.
Therefore, the perverts are out there taking pictures of those same kids--but, unless you're a negligent parent, they will not be able to film anything you couldn't see if you turned on your TV to the Disney channel.
Should we ban every activity and form of entertainment because, among our nation's 300-plus million residents, one or two perverts get off by watching them?
Once convicted of violating child pornography laws, perverts must register as sex offenders and are forever prohibited from being within a given distance of an unsupervised child, or in anyplace children are likely to frequent. Such person could be arrested for merely being at the beach at all.
The presumption of innocence, another Constitutional tenet, requires assuming that anyone engaging in a an activity which has a legitimate use is using it legitimately until it is proved otherwise.
Should everyone using an ATM be arrested, or should they be altogether outlawed, because a few people have retrieved money from them with stolen credit cards?
If you listen to the announcement made from the truck's loudspeaker in the last three parts, the lifeguards admit that filming there is my right and that they cannot stop me.
dude, i'm a lifeguard, but i'm not nice like them. i probably would've broke your camera and threw you in the ocean to drown. the point is you can't videotape on the beach because there ARE pervert out there, whether you are one or not.
It's obvious that everyone commenting on any video in this playlist has not viewed the entire playlist nor read the accompanying descriptions. You are making fools of yourselves by posting comments that show that you don't have a clue. The whole point of this is that I was being falsely accused-I only filmed objects, not people that day. The rest of what I shot is in the playlist.
These guys, and just about everyone else who works for the city, have it in for me because I film their coworkers fouling up on the job and put it on the internet, and they're afraid they might be next.
The ACLU and the NAACP each have pending suits against Miami Beach for systemic civil rights violations, the FBI is investigating the police for them, and I am in the process of preparing two individual cases whereby my rights were violated by city personnel, aside from the harassment suit for the behavior of the lifeguards here.
Hahaha, that's prime. This idiot goes around filming people breaking the law, and then gets upset when someone calls him out on breaking a worse law. What a jerk.
The whole point of this is that I WAS NOT BREAKING ANY LAW, I WAS ENGAGING IN BEHAVIOR THAT HAS BEEN PROTECTED BY THE SUPREME COURT AS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT. And he's calling me an idiot?
I am a state lifeguard and why we don't allow people to take pictures or video of other beach goers is because most of the time they are taking pictures of little boys and girls. It's a safety issue.
1. If there were a ban on photography there for safety reasons, It would be a 1st amendment violation per the Supreme Court. No such ban exists.
2. There were at least 50 others shooting there that day; none were hassled. I was singled out because I spoke at a City Commission meeting 3 days prior, re police department's lack of respect for 1st amendment, after being searched and threatened with trespassing arrest while petitioning for ballot initiative on the sidewalk in front of City Hall.
All three actually refused to reveal their names--when I asked, he said, "I'm the lifeguard. That's my name--The Lifeguard." The one who stands their silently said, "I'm the Other Lifeguard." The lieutenant said, "I'm their boss. That's my name--Their Boss." City regulations require that all employees identify themselves by name and job position to anyone who asks when they are on the clock. I'm sure they'll be disciplined.
This lifeguard is an idiot who can't even make a logical argument. Just blow him off.
boatbrain3 3 years ago
Why are you arguing with a lifeguard and preventing them from actually watching the waters. I would rather have them watch my kid then argue with you for filming them and they can arrest you for jepordizing public safety.
BHS391 3 years ago
he came up to me in his golf cart, while I was walking down the beach, and told me I was doing something I wasn't supposed to be doing. That's when I started filming. Watch the rest of the playlist and read the accompanying comments, and you'll see where it goes. He left his station of his own volition to harass me about something I not only wasn't doing, but which would not have been against any law or regulation if I had been doing it.
slferentz 3 years ago
In fact, it would have been Constitutionally protected behavior according to the Supreme Court, and is something hundreds of people do there every day without being harassed.
slferentz 3 years ago
Ok i see
BHS391 2 years ago
you are a wack job
patti2822 3 years ago
After somehow stumbling across a few of your videos, and becoming enthralled and checking a couple more, I can only say that you are wasting oxygen. Please save it for those who need it.
deurkin 3 years ago 3
I think that you just like to argue.
caffineguy 4 years ago 4
how is it fair to not let perverts that tape little kids and other sick shit film on the beach, yet let you film? do you see why it would've been better to just leave the camera at home?
clarkstkilla 4 years ago 5
I don't know what planet you're from, but in the USA the Supreme Court repeatedly has protected everyone's right under the first amendment to the Constitution ( that's the one that guarantees freedom of speech for all you ignorami ) to record audio and/or video of ANYTHING and EVERYTHING which occurs ANYWHERE that's both public and outdoors,
slferentz 4 years ago
unless it is taking place in an area to which admission is restricted by having to pay an admission charge or present a ticket or security clearance in order to enter. A beach in a state park fits none of those criteria, therefore anyone attempting to inhibit my filming there is violating my Constitutional rights.
slferentz 4 years ago
Should I attempt to profit from the publication of such media, I would then need a release from the subject, but I have an absolute right to film it.
slferentz 4 years ago
There are literally hundreds of people taking pictures on that beach every day, and nobody attempts to stop them. This includes parents photographing their own or their friends' kids.
slferentz 4 years ago
The Constitution also guarantees "equal protection under the law". That means that if it's legal for one person to do something, it cannot be illegal for anyone else to do it.
slferentz 4 years ago
Therefore, the perverts are out there taking pictures of those same kids--but, unless you're a negligent parent, they will not be able to film anything you couldn't see if you turned on your TV to the Disney channel.
slferentz 4 years ago
I'm sure there are perverts masturbating while watching adult sporting events, symphony concerts, courtroom dramas, even Barney the Purple Dinosaur.
slferentz 4 years ago
Should we ban every activity and form of entertainment because, among our nation's 300-plus million residents, one or two perverts get off by watching them?
slferentz 4 years ago
Once convicted of violating child pornography laws, perverts must register as sex offenders and are forever prohibited from being within a given distance of an unsupervised child, or in anyplace children are likely to frequent. Such person could be arrested for merely being at the beach at all.
slferentz 4 years ago
He would not need to be taking photographs or otherwise engaging kids. He would be jailed just for BEING THERE AT ALL.
slferentz 4 years ago
The presumption of innocence, another Constitutional tenet, requires assuming that anyone engaging in a an activity which has a legitimate use is using it legitimately until it is proved otherwise.
slferentz 4 years ago
Should everyone using an ATM be arrested, or should they be altogether outlawed, because a few people have retrieved money from them with stolen credit cards?
slferentz 4 years ago
If you listen to the announcement made from the truck's loudspeaker in the last three parts, the lifeguards admit that filming there is my right and that they cannot stop me.
slferentz 4 years ago
They are trying to intimidate me from exercising that right by falsely and publicly accusing me of taking "indiscreet pictures".
slferentz 4 years ago
This is both slander and dereliction of their duty because they left a guard tower unattended to pursue me down the beach making that announcement.
slferentz 4 years ago
dude, i'm a lifeguard, but i'm not nice like them. i probably would've broke your camera and threw you in the ocean to drown. the point is you can't videotape on the beach because there ARE pervert out there, whether you are one or not.
clarkstkilla 4 years ago 5
this is the type of retard that would complain if someone videotaped him.
clarkstkilla 4 years ago 5
It's obvious that everyone commenting on any video in this playlist has not viewed the entire playlist nor read the accompanying descriptions. You are making fools of yourselves by posting comments that show that you don't have a clue. The whole point of this is that I was being falsely accused-I only filmed objects, not people that day. The rest of what I shot is in the playlist.
slferentz 4 years ago
These guys, and just about everyone else who works for the city, have it in for me because I film their coworkers fouling up on the job and put it on the internet, and they're afraid they might be next.
slferentz 4 years ago
The ACLU and the NAACP each have pending suits against Miami Beach for systemic civil rights violations, the FBI is investigating the police for them, and I am in the process of preparing two individual cases whereby my rights were violated by city personnel, aside from the harassment suit for the behavior of the lifeguards here.
slferentz 4 years ago
If we don't get bent out of shape when our Constitutional freedoms are trampled, we won't be living in a free country very much longer.
"All that is necessary for evil to prosper is for good men to stand by and do nothing."
--Benjamin Franklin
slferentz 4 years ago
Hahaha, that's prime. This idiot goes around filming people breaking the law, and then gets upset when someone calls him out on breaking a worse law. What a jerk.
HomelessDog 4 years ago 5
The whole point of this is that I WAS NOT BREAKING ANY LAW, I WAS ENGAGING IN BEHAVIOR THAT HAS BEEN PROTECTED BY THE SUPREME COURT AS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT. And he's calling me an idiot?
slferentz 4 years ago
I am a state lifeguard and why we don't allow people to take pictures or video of other beach goers is because most of the time they are taking pictures of little boys and girls. It's a safety issue.
dvspnzr 4 years ago 5
1. If there were a ban on photography there for safety reasons, It would be a 1st amendment violation per the Supreme Court. No such ban exists.
2. There were at least 50 others shooting there that day; none were hassled. I was singled out because I spoke at a City Commission meeting 3 days prior, re police department's lack of respect for 1st amendment, after being searched and threatened with trespassing arrest while petitioning for ballot initiative on the sidewalk in front of City Hall.
slferentz 4 years ago
lol great job life guard ( not revelaing his name for u fag)
moadibmindkiller 4 years ago 5
All three actually refused to reveal their names--when I asked, he said, "I'm the lifeguard. That's my name--The Lifeguard." The one who stands their silently said, "I'm the Other Lifeguard." The lieutenant said, "I'm their boss. That's my name--Their Boss." City regulations require that all employees identify themselves by name and job position to anyone who asks when they are on the clock. I'm sure they'll be disciplined.
slferentz 4 years ago