Added: 4 years ago
From: dirklaureyssens
Views: 9,078
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (28)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @felix0113

    Thanks Felix. My website is mu6 com.

  • Is it possible that the multiverse may have a topology that clusters similar universes together, the similarities providing coherency, and the differences being expressed as the quantum inconsistancies that show up in the microwave background images. Could branes relate to each other in that way?

  • Genius, bless you

  • Brilliant :D

  • This is not my field, please forgive my lay reading of your ideas.

    However I would like to ask; Do you you see analogues between your hypothesis and Calabi-Yau manifold configuration in string theory?

    It occurs to me that if you are seeing any mathematical limits or dimensional structures, then you may be able to lever in some kind of initial state or necessary condition for our present universe, and perhaps would thus provide us with some elegant solutions.

  • My biggest gripe with your lecture is you don't describe it in a common sense way. Given that I don't know much about set theory (probably to my dismay) I should still be able to grasp some sense of your ideas. Even when I've listened to relativity lectures, I was able to understand vectors and tensors and how they worked around the curvature of space-time. Your stuff is so theoretical it doesn't seem to incorporate much common-sense physics. Maybe I'm wrong. But I don't think so.

  • can a singularity even have subsets?

    wouldn't that violate it's unity?

  • IMO a singularity refers to a single state of existence without coordinate system (metric) and physical duality, so a substance of pure energy (a Mother Membrane, MM), by axiom unbreakable, thus only convertible. No suicidal mechanism. The only way separation can happen is by self-coupling in a lasting way, where parts of chaotic energy (MM) get positions by making "spaces" by united curvatures of the MM on its own surface. These local spaces are now LM (Local Membrane parts), so topo sub-sets.

  • An essential question is how "space(s)" is created. Also to Frank Wilczek the basis of nature is pure energy. How can PURE ENERGY (PE) generate space(s)? There is only 1 way: by transforming itself into a local structure where such space is restructured (inter-positioned) energy. As shown in my movies a 2D membrane can create topological subsets (holons) that are multilayered (3D). Our Universe is such a space in macro. On the micro-level you get (virtual/fundamental) particle space(s)

  • Thank You , This is the most logical theory of everything I ever saw.

  • Many thanks munahiqahtani for your positive comments.

    Dirk.

  • You say that there is a continuous relation between the Catalan Numbers and space time if I understand you correctly. In that case I was wondering how you define the topology on the catalan numbers?

  • IFF we accept that spacetime can be seen as an unbreakable membrane, then parts of that M can enfold (self-fertilize) in local multilayered spaces (holons). Simple holons can make combinations with other holons, or with pure M. So complexity grows. The different ways such topological combinations can happen is identical to the Catalan Numbers (1, 2, 5, 14, ...). Check MU6 site, holon creation page, and click Pascal Triangle image. In reality not all combinations be possible(density & dimensions)

  • My definition was somewhat wrong, i meant to say that a membrane was a string stretched into two dimensions. So you mean to show the membrane as the origin of the universe, instead of a universe which had no initial shape.

  • What I prove is that we can have a logic concept about an interconnected universe. A single dynamic closed membrane (M)-which is unbreakable- can create local multilayered spaces (unions), which "seems" to be discrete (units, particles), but still are M (interconnected, so subject to attraction/repulse). The M may have been initially spherical, but by enfoldings/unfolding over time was deformed in more or less compactified zones. Indeed M is the origin and only substance. And vibration mediator

  • This makes it more clear, i understand it now. Who knows, it might well be true, science can change it has to.

  • Aside from labeling the Bb as an explosion, which is a major flaw, i can't understand it, no matter how hard i try. You seem to throw in some terms which you don't really understand fully or made up. It has no inherent logic and you go from one topic to the next without showing any relation between them.

  • Seems you admire probability. The universe is not ruled by statistics. I describe a pure logic cause/effect model for GRAVITY, that is not based on QM, but on fundamental elasticity (continuousness), with respect to Catalan Numbers. Everything is interconnected, but locally coupled into separate unions (topological holons). It's an analog model with continuously variable frame-of-references, not a digital model. Maybe you understand it when you look to my MU6 webpage about yin-yang and holons.

  • But membranes in the original meaning are twodimensional strings, of which vibration is responsible for various particles. How can this concept be responsible for the spatial dimensions?

  • Original? Membranes are pliable sheetlike surfaces, so 2D. 1-dimensional strings are mathematical constructs, not reality. My point: Why zillions of separate strings? Why not start with only 1 single 2D-string (a dynamic hollow sphere or tube), being the unbreakable singularity? The surface of that 2D-string oscillates, making local topological open tubes, and these can couple. But since the membrane is unbreakable the coupling results in multilayered spaces. In first instance with 3 layers.

  • I´ve heard about Gilles Deleuze,

    warm regards,

    Thingvellir,

  • Dear Friend, your ideas are interesting.

    Do you know Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari?

    I guess so.

    Why you choose a sphere?

    Why a closed membrane?

    Best Regards,

    PVA

  • Hi Per, Deleuze/Guattari: no, after wiking: nice. Hollow sphere, replaces the singular POINT(Hawking). No begin of begin, no end of end. A dynamic BOUNDARY (Membrane) is the only way to reach isolation/separation. It fits in my postulate of unbrokenness, which explains how separate subparts of the singularity can merge/structure into a local duality (UNION of yin+yang), acting as UNIT. 2 basic couplings can happen: Bosonic actions(harmonic), fermionic actions(unharmonic)depending on orientation

  • So do you think that black holes are a way for the energy from the universe to go back into the singularity? And also in parts of the universe there is spotaniuse growth areas witch are then coming from the cingularity?

  • Hi Kpl. (1)Black holes are universe de-couplings, but not straight to the level of the basic singularity, since the outcome is still on the sub-set level (like bursts of gamma rays and dark matter creation). The basic singularity of absolute no-thing-ness lays deeper, but is present everywhere in pure and re-arranged/restructured states (2)Parts of local growth in a mother universe - ie. baby universes - are giant spacial sub-sets created by the multi-level dynamics of the singularity.

  • Thx MaBu for reaction. The links you sent by PM are interesting.

  • That is definitely impressive post-metaphysics what you're cooking up there! That is to say, it's agreeable and I think I get what you say. I will send you two articles of interest.

  • I always intuitively suspected that spacetime might be best modeled as an organism or membrane of some kind. This gave me some visuals and concepts to grapple with. Thanks!

  • Hi Shr. The multilayer concept of holons is conform plasma interactions. In the most simple H (protium) the proton is central tube's tip, and the electron vibration is positioned in the outer shell. The middle tube is the inner boundary, isolating both. More complex atoms have more layers. Sacred Geometry is related to the angles of acceptance = angle the penetrating tube must have to pelastrate the passive tube. Pelastration is only possible in certain slots of entry, ie.angles in chemistry

  • I think you mite be interested in "Teslas dynamic theory of gravity". If you google for that, it should be the first link available on a site called peswiki.

  • Thx Shr, Indeed there are parallels with Tesla, like his view that "Electricity and magnetism could be associated with bound ether." In my approach: coupled membrane. You can check the brainmeta com forum: forum/index.php?showtopic=1599­2&pid=78031&mode=threaded&show­=&st=0&#entry78031

  • I would like to know if you have come across "Plasma Cosmology" and also "Sacred Geometry", and if you have considered weaving these two aspects into your theory.

  • just wondering, if this membrane would be composed by a certain structure then you just discard the idea of matter and anti-matter? And if this membrane is dynamic, I can suppose it is influenced by a forcefield? you also talked about:"how can a singularity destruct itself" I always learned that each particle can be destabilised by energie, so, with to much energie to beam out, the particle would be destroyed right? I guess the Higgs particle would be the best example of this?just curious.

  • Hi Jero. The concept confirms matter and anti-matter, and dark matter and dark energy. It just are similar structures at the other side of the membrane. When it's on the other side we can't observe it but only measure it by it's effects (i.e. a collider bubble chamber). We can only observe events that are on our side of the membrane. Indeed IFF the conditions are present you have decay to a more simple (holon) structure.

  • Just wondering, have you considered the possibilty of the singularity itself being dynamic in shape and motion? In otherwords, have you explored the possibilty between the singularity being spherical, or being toroidal in structure?

  • Hi Shr. Yes, the membrane is dynamic, it's THE forcefield. And it has the potency to manifest itself in various shapes. When parts (peaks) of the membrane sphere meet and couple, the two parts of the passive have each a type of hole and those together will have a type of torus shape. The cause of the two holes is the penetrating (invisible) active peak. In black hole decay you see the opposite. The magnetic torus (matter) gets smaller and the middle peak (energy) is pushed out as gamma rays.

  • I agree with just one thing, locality should be an emergent property of a quantum space, but that quantum state should be background independent, which your model is not. Also, to get matter there are recent works that show us the possibility to get barionic matter from group U(1)

  • Thanks for comment. No, my theory is background independent. There is no metric, there are no coordinates. Topology changes are due to dynamic processes. The pelastration/enfolding action creates multi-layered holons, having "structure" but still being membrane. These holons ARE local frames of references or act as metric(s), having three joined dimensions which can act locally as a local coordinate system. Dirk.

  • Very interesting, i really like the bell metaphor aswell. What would the membrane be composed of itself, light? Also, how would "non-existence" be incorporated into this model. Sorry if this makes no sense.

  • Thanks! The membrane is composed by an elastic surface substance. Not by braids like in some Loop Gravity. In Kaballa this is the Absolute that makes the three layers Ain, Ain Soph and Ain Soph Aur. Non-existence? The membrane is to be considered "Neutral Energy" (or not-yet-manifested = no-thing-yet). By the enfolding (pelastration action) the first holon-type is created which has 3 layers, thus has "structure" (some-thing-now), which is manifested and entangled energy. In example: a photon.

  • yeah. what he said.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more