keith olbermann - donald rumsfeld sold nukes to north korea

[jowns0]

ah its like the pravda of 1950, oh how I miss the lies.

[ssamjung]

Keith Olbermann is a douchebag, and is intentionally misrepresenting the facts.

[jowns0]

you whats funny, everyone said oh talk with stalin. that worked well.

[jar1001]

When was this report done on Olbermann?

[ae357em]

Wake Up People! The Republicans and Democrats are opposite sides of the same coin: The New World Order. Their seal is on the back of the dollar bill. 1776 was the year their conspiracy was founded: The Illuminati/Masons.

[qantmrckr]

If Bush were a dem, we'd just have a corrupt dem in office.

[sat9008]

if bush was a DEM olbermann would not be saying this

[TankJacked]

if bush was a dem we wouldn't have a war either.

[damonsecloro]

ron paul 2008

[dentalomental]

duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu­uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude..

bush can't DEBATE the Iranian President

bush can't talk to saddam, the N. Korean dictator,..

bush debated or talked to any Axis of Evil leader

you'd see bush on the cover of a B&D Magazine wearing

a leather collar, thong and boots as his bitch.

Of course, bush did put the Atomic Bomb schematics

on the Internet..

Do you want him to talk to Kimmie boy?

[PhantomNIR]

"Just Say No" to psychos with nukes..

[valarmorgulis]

Watched documentary "Why We Fight" by the BBC yesterday. It's Really good. Interesting points. You can see it here on You Tube. Just type in the title.

[ArcticGarlicX]

North Korea is not a threat because MANY countries, in ALL directions, would be more than happy and willing to blow NK sky high. NK knows this.

[EchelonMonitor]

Iraq wasn't a threat either. North Korea doesn't have to worry about an invasion, though--they're not sitting on the worlds largest oil reserves.

[joemwm]

Echelonmonitor:when this situation started all north korea wanted a nonattack treaty they didn't get it so it was forced to develope a detourent

[ArcticGarlicX]

EchelonMonitor, Saddam's regime was a clear threat as is the Saddam loyalists, Al-Qeada, and all it's allied terrorist groups to this day.

[IrrigatedPancake]

Al-Qaeda, if ever loyal to any country leaders, was behind Syria until Syria started accepting U.S. military support, which was when Osama and Al-Quaeda left Syria and went rogue.

[ArcticGarlicX]

Doesn't take much to piss off Al-Qaeda, now does it.

[IrrigatedPancake]

nope, just fire them and hire infidels.

[TheSometimesWhy]

can anyone tell me one thing the bush administration has improved/done right? obviously, i am not posing this question to any halliburton stockholders...

all the best and then some,

michael

[farber207]

This sale was part of Clinton's plan to STOP them from making weapons. These light water reactors were non-weaponized reactors given to the North Koreans so they would not build weaponized ones. Although they have the same power-generating capabilities, it is far more difficult to use them to produce weapons-grade plutonium.

[EchelonMonitor]

Iran too--google:

sold nuclear technology to Iran Rumsfeld

It's not the nukes in Iran that make the neo-cons determined to attack--it's the Euro-based oil exchange they plan to setup in May.

A Euro oil exchange will crash the dollar and force a stop to their rampant printing of dollars they use to rip-off the American taxpayer.

[ajaxrobinson]

so you think there will be an iran invasion by may? how long would it take for the american dollar to crash if this oil exchange was set up?

[EchelonMonitor]

I would suspect not long. If the Chinese see it's happening and start dumping their dollars, then others follow them, it will happen fast.

There are some scattered reports that they will attack Iran about April 5--I hope it doesn't happen, and I hope they can be stopped.

The Saudis have started criticizing Bushco, which is unusual since they have such close ties to Bush Sr., James Baker (he represented them in the lawsuit against the victims of 9/11) and Kissinger.

[joemwm]

EchelonMonitor:Iran is wanting to use the euro as well the question is is bush protecting theAmerican people or american banks

[sundropdave]

I predicted the Iraq invasion based on the Euro theory, it would be absolutely incredible if the same thing happens with Iran. All for the short term dollar. Bush doesnt feel American can compete fairly economically in the world, so it must rape. Its sad...

[joemwm]

sundropdave:The US dosn't want to compete fairly it wants to keep it's monoply and control

[genghis6199]

this begs the question, why doesn't america dismantle it's own nukes?. why don't other countries deserve to have them?. lets face it the only country that goes around killing and invading is america. they're the one country that should be controlled. they ignore the u.n. they don't obey the geneva convention.

[SOMUCHFORFREEMEDIA]

It gets worse.

I know what the NEW WORLD ORDER is . Do YOU ?

My channel may be a key for YOU. KNOWLEDGE IS POWER !

[besnugg]

Funny...North Korea builds a nuke, sets it off, and lets everyone know that not only are they building more, they're building missiles to put them on. Iran, according to the C.I.A., can't build a nuke until at least 2017. But Iran is the one Bush is preparing to attack...hmm. Could it be because Iran has oil?

[ajdollmaker]

No Doubt, and the bad Karma on the United States builds.

[hannitysux]

Add this to one more major fuck up by Bush. Thanks a lot losers for voting him into two terms.

[p3on]

o rumsfeld, what have you done now -_- tisktisk

[Strongtuit]

Rumsfield is innocent.

North Korea knows that Hussein is just another 'articulate' Jimmah Carrrter.

A weak sister who sure can read a teleprompter but in the end is nothing more than an empty suit of appeasement.

Clintons legacy is now complete. A disgraceful scumbag that chased little school girls around the Oval Office and sent Jimmah to help N. Korea build Nukes.

That Nobel Peace Prize must sure look nice sitting on Jimmah's book shelf, while Korea thumbs their nose at America.

[p3on]

oh cute, a freeper. hey remember that time one of your posters, Rosanna Pulido, won the republican primary for illinois' 5th congressional, but then got exposed for posting a bunch of racist shit on freep? yeah, me too.

do you seriously believe jimmy carter of all people helped nk build nukes? their nuclear program started in 1989, and the only third party that helped them develop nuclear technology was pakistan. you have such a childish view of world events.

[Strongtuit]

Can't say that I remember that, bedwetter. But I do remember Bernie Ward liberal bedwetting child porn lover getting busted up in San Fransisco.

And seriously, from the party of KKK Bryd, "There are white nigggers. I've seen a lot of white nigggers in my...", do you reallly want to bring up racist?

The Child Molester, Clinton was starting to get the military ready, when Jimmah rode in on his white horse and got the madman to 'PROMISE" not to do anymore work on Nukes.

Talk about a child view.

[p3on]

you ought to remember since it was just a few short months ago. anyway, you wanna get into child molesters? check out armchair subversive (dot com), it's a giant list of republican pedophiles, many of them elected officials.

and of course you cant back up a damn thing you're saying.

[Strongtuit]

Everything I say is true, bedwetter.

I am here to shine the light ray of truth on the cesspool of lies from liberalism.

I take no pleasure in constantly correcting the many personal attacks and lies from Marxists, Commies and anti-American liberals that make up the demorat party..

Its just my contribution to America and humanity.

I can tell you want to thank me for my time and my efforts.

Its ok, bedwetter. You can thank me by turning away from the cesspool of liberalism.

[p3on]

hahaha yes, "everything i say is true because i say it is". that's a really good way to back up your statements. what the fuck makes you think i'm a democrat? i'm a straight up socialist. take a look at scandinavia, they're way better off than we are.

[Strongtuit]

Commie, Socialist, Demonrat.... all names for the same shit. Just someone who is a parasite on society and unwilling to accept responsibility for their own actions.

[p3on]

hahahaha you're so pathetic, literally the only thing you can do is namecalling. you're exactly like every other freeper on the internet, if you're exposed to someone with different ideas all you can do is get pissed off and try make strawman attacks. you can't defend your own ideological positions because you're totally ignorant. maybe there's a reason no one takes you guys seriously

[Strongtuit]

You're right bedwetter.

Scandinavia is a great liberal bedwetting utopia.

Please get the hell out of my country and go be a parasite on theirs.

As to your point that exposure to other ideas makes me pissed, I can say without any hesitation that exposure to the orgy of Husseins multi Trillion Dollar spending spree has indeed pissed me off. I hate to see how he is destroying America.

But you unhinged libs loved President's Bush's idea of liberating Iraq and creating a democracy there, eh?

[p3on]

hahaha, scandinavian nations are better than the US by every objective measure (crime, happiness, rich/poor divide, etc)

you know bush spent over a trillion dollars in the first 3 months of iraq, right?

you people are so simplistic

[Strongtuit]

You know what you might try to do sometime, bedwetter.

Actually have some facts to use to justify what you say.

But then that would mean you might actually be personally responsible and then you wouldn't be such an unhinged liberal bedwetting moonbat parasite.

Please leave America if you believe your lies.

The entire liberation of Iraq hasn't cost that much in 6 years bedwetter Compared to the orgy of spending the Marxist Hussein has had in his first few days, Bush was an amature.

[p3on]

you're right, i was mistaken, the actual figure was $100b. totally justified, right? i mean look at how much better off iraq is today! look how happy and safe the people are

iraqis killed by saddam: 300,000

iraqis killed by US occupation: 1,030,000

[Strongtuit]

You know what you might try to do sometime, bedwetter.

Actually have some facts to use to justify what you say.

But then that would mean you might actually be personally responsible and then you wouldn't be such an unhinged liberal bedwetting moonbat parasite.

Your figures are totally crap.

The terrorists don't count for causualties and the innocent civilians were killed by the terrorists that we were eliminating.

Total Iraqi's liberated.......... 50 Million

Thanks America.

[p3on]

yeah, very convincing, say my figures are "crap" with absolutely nothing to support your claim. you might want to look up the lancet survey on iraqi casualties. people like you dismiss it out of hand because it doesn't line up with your pathetically skewed image of reality, but it's stood up to criticism from people a lot smarter than you. not that they're hard to find.

[Strongtuit]

The Lancet 'survey' was discredited the day the liberal biased organization released it.

You can't get away with lies here, bedwetter.

This isn't the Brown Shirt Hussein Loving State News MSNBC.

This is real.

Look it up bedwetter, if you got any guts.

Anti-war Soros funded Iraq study - Times Online

Jan 13, 2008 ... The Lancet "study" was debunked virtually the moment it was published. The radcial left relies soley on the Big Lie since the facts are in

Grow up bedwetter. Grow up.

[p3on]

sorry retard, the grant bestowed on the survey was given to them by the open society institute, which was founded (but not controlled) by soros (who probably wasnt even aware of the contribution). in addition, the money was given to the survey over 6 months after it had been commissioned. the OSI had no control or influence over the way the survey was conducted or presented.

you idiots can't even research your own arguments.

[p3on]

you're also literally saying a *medical journal* is a "liberal biased organization"

you're fucking delusional with paranoia

[Strongtuit]

The Lancet study was led by far leftist anti-American commie, Les Roberts.

Everyone knows the study was bogus, thats why no reputable news outlet ever used its findings. Lancet said the number was 100,000 in 2004, right before the prez election bedwetter, then again two years later they upped it to 555,000, again right before the elections, bedwetter. Thats over 23,000 killed each month in between studies, moron.

Liberalism is a mental disease. Get help bedwetter. Your insanity is showing

[Strongtuit]

Thats your lame attempt at a defense of the far leftist Brown Shirt Fascist 'Open Society', bedwetter?

Now I know why Mike Savage says Liberalism is a mental disease.

Anti American commie Libs love to be lied to because it absolves them from having to struggle with facts that dismiss their unhinged beliefs.

The New York Post story calls the Soros-Lancet study a "sham".

Even an antiwar activist group, Iraq Body Count, claimed 45,000 dead, a fraction of the Lancet figure.

Grow up bedwetter.

[p3on]

oh woops lets fail to take into account that the 2006 lancet study is the single most comprehensive survey on iraqi casualties

can you find any flaws in the peer reviewed methodology? or are you really accusing them of being stupid enough to straight-up fake the report, which would eternally sabotage the careers of all involved and any funding connected to them if discovered?

you have no connection to reality, all you can do is try to shout people down and wave the flakiest of evidence

[Strongtuit]

Show me one non unhinged liberal bedwetting moonbat commie outfit that doesn't call the Lancet study pure BullShit.

I can show you thousands of reputable unbiased sources that prove the Lancet report was just wishful lies by unhinged anti-American commies financed by Soros.

Just start with the Wikapedia page on the Bull Shit from Lancet.

Mike Savage is right. Liberalism is a mental disease.

[p3on]

hahaha no matter what source i show you, you'll accuse it of being biased. for fuck's sake you referenced the new york fucking post, the epitome of american tabloids, to back up your own claims.

keep in mind, you're accusing me of using a source that has an ideological interest in presenting a particular scenario, whereas you're using the US military's official figures, which of course has been shown in the past of doing this very thing.

p.s., mike savage's real name is michael weiner

[Strongtuit]

What does the American Military have to do with Wikipedia, bedwetter?

Mike Weiner is right. Liberalism is a mental disease.

Actually a PHD nailed it.

Veteran psychiatrist calls liberals mentally ill

Dr. Lyle Rossiter, author of the new book, "The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness." "Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against normal responsibilities of adulthood & demand that a parental government meet their needs from cradle to grave."

Thats it, bedwetter.

[p3on]

hahaha you're such a fucking child, honestly, someone writes a reactionary book to pull some cash from idiots like you and i'm supposed to have my world turned upside down by the title of a book or something? how about "like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against basic empathy with non-whites, and demand that their government protect fetuses, execute adults and call it a 'culture of life'"

freepers have the most absurd cognitive dissonance.

[Strongtuit]

Truth hurts eh, bedwetter?

What the liberal mind is passionate about is a world filled with pity, sorrow, neediness, misfortune, poverty, suspicion, mistrust, anger, exploitation, discrimination, victimization, alienation and injustice.

Those who occupy this world are workers, minorities, the little guy, women, and the unemployed.

They are poor, weak, sick, wronged, cheated, oppressed, disenfranchised, exploited and victimized.

They bear no responsibility for their problems.

[p3on]

hahaha what the fuck are you even saying

keep beating that strawman, i'm sure he'll start bleeding eventually

[p3on]

i just noticed you referenced the NEW YORK POST. have you ever read it? here's there current top headline: "BETRAYED: My Dead Hubby Had Five Secret Lovers"

[rudenoodle]

Haha,  "your country" as if you get a say in how it's run.

What is wrong with being a Marxist by the way?