Interview with the Assassin

[iExiiL3]

This movie was good 4/5

[FlowTrainer]

So many have tried to divert attention from the offender...

[TPBXDRicky420]

Reminds me of James Files. The assassin who came forward about the JFK assassination.

[weirdo3140]

This movie is on Netflix instant view for those who have Netflix. I just watched it there and thought it was great!

[normalguyable]

the writer is a vegan., i wish more people cared about animals murdered for humans taste buds.

[3truthsayer]

Layer upon layer of cover and confusion. These are the tactics that keep a secret of what's really no secret. Orders for complex plans always come from above, but never directly.

[yahrasta]

first time i watched this i actually thought it was the real deal.. got slightly disappointed when i found out the opossite.. i thought finally someone is steppin up cuz it wasnt lee harwey that did it.. but nuuuuuuu

[MrFrankster25]

Is this a true story?

[PesterStone]

@MrFrankster25 Nope. No worries, It's a mockumentary! :)

[slytown]

Dewey Cox's dad killed Kennedy! :)

Anyway, I saw this movie right after it came out. I remember being so compelled by it, even though I didn't know much about the assassination. I have to watch it again and see if it still holds up. I remember thinking it was such a good movie.

[dtjones5]

@slytown wats it called

PLEASE LET ME KNOW

[jimswe]

If anyone has this whole movie could you please post it?, been looking everywhere but i cant find it.

[glennbun420]

@jimswe you got it ?

[rocky9298]

@jimswe try hulu i saw it there

[pajasa62]

Warren Commission had a "pre-existing" belief to find Oswald guilty?

WRONG!

DEAD WRONG!

Hale Boggs and Richard Russell put up a stiff argument about some of the evidence brought into question...and as evidence by 2 of their staff lawyers on "Beyond Conspiracy" ..."The one thing we wanted to do was find a conspiracy...I myself had politically ambitions"

And don't call lone-nutters "idiots" in one post and then pretend to be so open-minded.

[hogger129]

The reason I choose not to be called a CT is because I don't sit there and pay attention to only the stuff that supports a conspiracy. Because then your just as bad as a "lone nut" guy.

[hogger129]

You gotta remember how dangerous Kennedy was to many peoples' interests. By the time he was killed, he had everybody against him. And it only makes sense they all conspired to cover it up in order to look out for their interets. If you wanna know who was really at the top, and sort of the "how" behind it all, look at the Bay of Pigs, Mongoose, and the events that followed. It was meant to kill Castro, but slowly, it turned into Frankenstein and they all felt betrayed and killed Kennedy.

[hogger129]

If you ask me - personally - I don't believe Oswald killed Kennedy. I think it was a group of rogue CIA people, whether it was CIA operatives, CIA-Mafia double-agents, Cuban exiles working for the CIA, it doesn't matter. All we can say is that it was professional assassins. TMWKK suggests it was Corsican hitmen. I certainly find that very believable. And then everyone just decided to go along and cover it up because with Kennedy gone, everybody gets what they want.

[MaDFuRiT86]

It was agreed that Files would use his Remington Fireball gun from behind the fence on the Grassy Knoll and that Nicoletti would position himself in the Dal-Tex Building. Files believes that Nicoletti's bullets hit both John F. Kennedy and John Connally. However, Files claimed that his bullet that hit Kennedy in the head. Apparently Files was given $30,000 for his role in the assassination. Files continued to work for Charlie Nicoletti until he was murdered on 29th March, 1977.

[supastarSARUH]

Remember that the CIA is an organization built on lies, murder and disinformation. They are the ones trying to keep files on George Joannides and others from seeing the light of day. Anyone who believes Oswald was a "lone nut" is himself a lone nut and a willing sucker for government propaganda.

[themeaningoflife38]

George Joannides Gordon Campbell & David Morales were all caught on film & photographs at the scene of RFK's murder.

[Mrfreeze20]

Great movie!

[pajasa62]

...and that's all the JFK assassination is to most people, just alot of "entertainment". To study the evidence, to find out that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone is simply too boring for them, and the "for profit" conspiracy crowd has tons of customers...

[liltimmy1313]

it makes for a good movie. It was actually very new and refreshing compared to some of the bullshit in hollywood nowadays...

[LazlosPlane]

I never found it (the assassination) nor the conspiracy (which it is) very entertaining or funny. That day is burned forever in my memory and I think as a young person (nine) it was traumatic.

Oswald acted alone? And Saddam had WMD's. And the Viet Cong fired on us at the Gulf of Tonkin... and...

[pajasa62]

"Saddam had WMD's. And the Viet Cong fired on us at the Gulf of Tonkin"

This has WHAT to do with JFK's death?

Maybe this is why in 45 years conspiracy theorist can't come up with any consensus of WHO were the conspirators were, WHAT was their motive to kill, WHERE the shots came from and HOW any evidence of these "shooters" disappeared without a trace.

These so-called "theorists" never accept the burden of a theory and resort to code-breaking, embellishing what helps & IGNORE what doesn't.

[LazlosPlane]

Brilliant logic. Absolutlely brilliant.

[eljamiro]

If you dont know what the first couple of sentences has to do with it well im sorry for you,you just dont get it.

[pajasa62]

Maybe try to explain yourself instead of just trying saying NOTHING!

[justanotherkevin]

All ou have to do is look at the autopsy photos. JFK was hit once in the back (entered his upper back, exited his throat), and he was hit in the forehead from the front. Like I said all you have to do is look at the autopsy photos. Know how to use google?

[pajasa62]

YEAH....that's why in 45 years no one talks about this shot in the forehead. And people have been studying this LONG before people had "known how to use google" as you say.

The JFK conspiracy crowd has dissolved into a sci-fi community, just go to a Lancer convention in Dallas....they come up with 50+ different ways this single event happened, hitting contradictions in every direction.

[justanotherkevin]

Like I said there is no need to argue the photos speak for themselves.

[hogger129]

The autopsy photos anyone can see these days are useless because it's likely they were from the wrong body and the wounds were likely altered. Nobody can prove it IS or ISNT Kennedy. People have produced evidence. It's been suppressed. There was no shot in the forhead. There was a shot above the right temple, that blew out the back right part of his head, indicating there was almost definately a shot from directly in front. Likely from the trip underpass, where CIA people were known to be.

[pajasa62]

A shot "likely from the triple-underpass"

Have you EVER seen the uncropped 2nd famous photo by Altgens? I guess not. If you did, you'd see a large number of railroad workers with 2 police officers amongst them standing on the overpass.

You can speculate till your blue in the face and NEVER have a 2nd shooter, never a 2nd gun, never a bullet tied to gun other than Oswald's, never have plotters and never have a conspiracy...you'll just have a pre-existing belief & try to build a story around it.

[hogger129]

The Altgen's photo is of the side of the Dal-Tex Building, where many people believe there was another shooter in a third-floor window. Don't try to confuse me because I know wtf I'm talking about. Do you? Obviously not. Take a look at the Moorman photograph. It shows what appears to be another shooter on the grassy knoll, behind the picket fence. You can make out what is a police officer, firing a rifle at Kennedy's motorcade. The bullets the WC presented, do not match other evidence.

[pajasa62]

"The Altgen's photo is of the side of the Dal-Tex Building, where many people believe there was another shooter in a third-floor window. Don't try to confuse me because I know wtf I'm talking about. Do you? Obviously not."

Nivce bluff at "being smarter"...

As I said Altgens SECOND famous photo which shows the triple-overpass in the background with about 10 people standing on it (including 2 cops) and in the foreground is Clint Hill standing on the bumper of the limo with Jackie elevated.

[pajasa62]

"Take a look at the Moorman photograph. It shows what appears to be another shooter on the grassy knoll, behind the picket fence. You can make out what is a police officer, firing a rifle at Kennedy's motorcade."

You have to be on LSD to decipher the form of ANYTHING let alone a police officer from that low-grade photo.

Nice, that you can an image on that, but don't even know about Altgens 2nd photo.

And then you say "I'm not a conspiracy theorists I just "question" the official story"

[hogger129]

"Pre-existing" belief and build a story around it? Isn't that exactly what the WC did? They knew who their man was. Oswald. And they just tried to manipulate evidence to connect him to the crime. In other words - frame him. People don't believe the official story because there's a lot of stuff out there that suggests things contrary to the WC's findings.

[prawdaeh]

Bottom line...we don't know the truth. CIA was meant for intelligence only yet, they were responsible for our actions in Nicauragua, the Bay of Pigs. They have more power than they were ever intended to have. And they shred or burn most documents relating to major events that happened in US history. It's deceitful. If they have nothing to hide then let them quit hiding information from us. Prove to us beyond doubt the truth. Power to the people...yet we have none.

[pajasa62]

Well just watch a stupid movie like this, or some Oliver Stone "JFK" crap and that's all you need.

45 years and still waiting for these "theorists" (what a misnomer!) to stop with their "don't sweat the details of what really happened" mentality. Instead, we still have this stupid % of the population beleiving bullets were planted on stretchers and puffs of smoke and the hitman Ruby with no escape route. Anything with the slightest bit of plausibility they swallow without thinking just WANTING.

[hogger129]

Watch Executive Action. A much better film about the JFK assassination, IMO. It's better because it feels more realistic and it's more believable, and you get to view it in the bigger picture, as opposed to just the New Orleans connections part of it. I think there were 3 shots from the TSBD. But there were other gunmen involved. Not saying Executive Action got it 100% right. Just saying they are more correct than others. Don't listen to the "Lone Nut" believers. They're idiots.

[hogger129]

New Orleans part of it from "JFK" by Oliver Stone.

[pajasa62]

You seem to be liking these movies A BIT too much. These are MOVIES, OK?

You say, "I think there were 3 shots from the TSBD. But there were other gunmen involved."

Just IGNORE the earwitness surveys done in Dealey Plaza AT THE TIME: 136 people hearing 3 shots and only SIX hearing 4 shots. BUT if this overwhelming consensus favored CTers, they'd be celebrating.

Sure, after the fact you can invent all the number of shots and different angles you need to fit into your so-called "theory ".

[hogger129]

Hey, remember, the Warren Commission findings are also theories as well. Nothing was ever proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Oswald was never proven to have shot a gun at all that day. So what if they're movies? I didn't say anything about the movies being real. I simply said that Executive Action is a better film about the JFK assassination than 'JFK.' If you honestly believe the official story, without question, then you're a fuckin idiot. And I question the official story and am not a CT.

[Obelisk2290]

this must make the 272nd person that killed kennedy