How will it be cooled and oiled? Who will be able to recondition it when it wears? Those banana shaped pistons look so complicated to make so what is the point? Nowadays 16 valve turbo four cylinder engines can easily produce 100HP per litre and I sorry to say that Kugel-Motor vs Hayabusa looks no contest. I've had German vehicles in the past but to be 100% truthful British is best. "Kaput Durch Technik" is the problem (for example £57,000 cars whose 2-cogs-at-once gearboxes explode)
Toll aus 1.2 Liter 60Kw/82PS das geht heute auch mit der alten Hunkolben Technologie dafür braucht man keinen Kugelmotor. Der Wankel packt sogar mehr ohne Aufladung. Ich denke aber nicht das er Effizienter ist und vorallem schaut mal wo da die Zündkerzen sind, an der Seite, das ist aber nicht gerade Wartungsfreundlich. Ich denke der Kugelmotor geht in die Richtung Wankel, hoher Ölverbrauch und Spritverbrauch, aber dennoch weniger Leistung als Wankel!
mechanically brilliant however wont stand a chance against otto engies cause its just as the wankel engine way to complicated to service in car and there is still a problem of lubricating the "pistons" without burning oil...might be interesting for the use of hydrogen though cause if its local seperation of injektion an combustion wich allows the use of fuel with inhomogene mixture tendencies.....well....wankel engine does so to and comes with less moving parts
A little more promising than the Wankel engine. Although this motor could be plagued by the same problems as the wankelmotor.... this I mean expelling unburned fuel through the exhaust. Thus is an inefficient combustion cycle.
Beatifull, but I must be an ass because don´t understand a shit of it. Pls see my invention that is more easy to learn , diesel motor 2 strokes by valves only without springs.
@Stealthsoldier20 I was teasing you. I thought my first remark was quite obvious. We already have a bunch of internal combustion engines. Al of them suffer the same kind of shortcomings. All of them widely known.
In fact of better knowledge we use the same old crap over and over. On top of that some guys think of another kind of internal combustion engine.
There is no need for new ideas, because the better ideas (also widely known) are already out there.
We need to see it running. How nice it looks in drawings is rather irrelevant. I want to know if it gives a smooth power curve. Because from here it looks like it would stall with 50% load.
Actually all kinds of friction forces are applied to this engine. The whole power is applied to a few small ceramic balls, which roll inside grooves and make the pistons to reciprocate (in relation to each other) while turning and producing torque. Complex pistons (not cylindricall), surfaces and engine overall, Only if test results will be published incl. stress tests, efficiency, HP etc that prove 2B a LOT better than a conventional engine it will have some hope..
This is common with similar projects -too much fanfare, publicity and funding before it is even tested! Why run it and ruin everything? Everyone likes it as it is... as a beautiful ...thing! Where are all those great inventors who based everything to experiments? Now eveyone is happy if it runs on their PC! If it was me, I wouldn't show it to anyone, not even to my friends without making it work first!
@qp12qp I agree to each and every word of yours! If Wilbur Wright and Orville Wright lived nowadays they'd never fly, but we'd see tons of vids showing their inventions ;)
Ok, I did a little search and there is one video showing it work on youtube: "Hüttlin-Kugelmotor auf dem Prüfstand", but no specs, efficiency, nothing.
@qp12qp Yes yes, I was just joking about the top comment. "Nope! Future is only electric." Like if electrifying everything would just solve the efficiency problem of the world.
60 kw bei 3000 Umdrehungen und einem 1,6 Liter Motor! Respekt! Das ist extrem effizient und umweltfreundlich. Strommotoren sind nur effektiv wenn die Batterien dies auch sind. Sie alle sollten sich lieber mal schlau machen was für die Herstellung von so einem Li-Ion Akku alles benötigt wird. Diese "Energiespeicher" der Zukunft müssten 4mal so lange halten wie sie es tut nur um als "umweltfreundlich" zu gelten. Der Motor hat Zukunft! und wenn nicht als antrieb dann als Energiequelle für E-KFZ
Ich weiß, dass das Baden ist und würde auch nie einen Badenser als Schwaben bezeichnen. Hab 2 Jahre in Offenburg gelebt, aber der spricht irgendwie völlig anders - eher wie ein Schwyzzr. "Tiefbadisch" als eigene Sprache war mir bisher nicht geläufig.
Check out The new engine Michigan state has developed. No battery needed to run an electric hy-brid. 5 times more efficiant than the most efficiant on the market today. New and awsom idea!!
I saw the video "Norbert Mueller describes his wave disk generator", nice idea -it's a sort of a jet engine, but so simple and he couldn't manage to demonstrate? And how he knows it's efficiency beforehand, by software simulation? That's the way of academics-non-experimenters species. They usually fail. Still on theory-fantasy zone.
Nope! Future is only electric. No internal combustion engine can be compared to a modern electric motor (highest efficiency, lightest, smallest, immediate and accurate response, full power at all speeds, lowest noise, no need for oxygen, no exhaust and pollution, lowest maintenance, highest longevity, highest reliability, just a single moving part).
It's the power source (batteries etc) that we are waiting to get better. Then, anything that burns fuel will be ancient history.
@N3m3cis I have. But we don't have fusion power plants or any serious power from turbines. Solar panels are a joke in places like the UK.
My point is what's happening now and what will happen for the foreseeable few decades. Power will continue coming from fossil and fission sources.
I am all for your suggestion, but I dislike people selling things as 'green' when it's simply 'hidden'. Or a shit product, like 'green' white paint; which goes yellow.
@lexichronicle2 Good points, and i was bit hasty to go there. And besides few people seem to take on account the resources needed to build a new car and energy it takes while it's being produced. In my opinion we should really just cut back on our "need" to drive so much around. I know, not going to happen in the near future, but we should really take a closer look at our habbits and reasons for them...
@qp12qp Where does electric come from? Over 70% of electric come from thermal power plants, which convert fuel to electric at the efficiency of 30%～40%. Internal combustion engine is currently-known most efficient thermal engine which can achieve 50% efficiency at most. Thus in SOME situations internal combustion engine means higher efficiency than pure electric-driven vehicles.
It depends on where you take it from. You could take it from the sun, the wind, the earth (geothermal), the sea (sea waves and tidal energy), the rivers or waterfalls (hydroelectric).
However, the world-leading bankers' gang don't want you to take it from renewable sources. They want you to continuously consume non-renewable fuels and therefore continuously invest and borrow money from them. So electric comes from the puppets politicians who obey those bankers, the ones you vote.
No, that's just *today's* illusion as it was when we first listened to a CD, playing without any hiss noise (compared to vinyl and tape), as it was when the first digital cameras released -with no film inside, "it will fail", "film will never die" (actually Kodak died who failed to see reality) etc etc. Now we are all happy and grateful for the amazing advantages that these technologies offer, even the most skeptists professionals. Less romantic, maybe, boring never!
@qp12qp Since all internal combustion engines can be retroengineered to work as pumps, maybe there's a use for this invention as a highly efficient pump.
No problem, I understand. Keep in mind though that today, motors are still used to replace combustion engines in combustion-engine style vehicles. The next generations of electric vehicles will be designed specifically for electric motors, will exploit all their advantages and will extend the capabilities of today's vehicles in ways that most people can't even imagine (impossible for combustion engines). Then, -remember this: Even you will buy one!
@qp12qp Thats a good point, however ill still want a big noisy obnoxious powerful fast brutal engine thats soul purpose is performance not economy... YAY
That will be fun, but with all that noise you won't hear an EQUALLY powerful e-vehicle passing you by like you were moving backwards! I'm not exaggerating, this is another advantage of e-motors: They can withstand (and deliver) huge amounts of extra power -until heat builds up while i.c.engines have a structural limit: If you do the same they will explode or get destroyed BEFORE they get hot! With future commercial superconductors guess what: No overheating at all!
@qp12qp So you already figured out what those manufacturers with billion dollars of investment, and professors that has 30 years of experience couldn't figure out... Congratulations. They should've asked you before carrying out all those alternatives.
By the way, leave my skeptism aside and make a little research about source of electricity and energy output levels of combustion and electron exchange.
I did, briefly. A) the scientific community is against, since the inventor doesn't reveal how it works, until an intern. patent is issued. B) the patent office said it's not patendable because it "offends against the generally accepted laws of physics and established theories", which says a lot about the credibility of the patent offices and their motives! Just take a look at hundreds of approved inventions that range from UFOs to antigravity. Wiki "Energy Catalyzer".
One more thing -an advice: Try to think out of the box. You have a brain, not a tape recorder. Don't let others think for you, and don't judge what is right or wrong by averaging statistically what everyone else is doing -or not. Get the facts, research, and even better learn from history, to see the pattern: In 200 years we'll look to them as total primitives. Also, don't take into account everyone involved. There is just a bunch of inventors. Everyone else is copying!
It depends on where you take it from. You could take it from the sun, wind, earth (geothermal), sea waves, tide, rivers, watefalls, or from all the green sources combined. Here is another idea: 3/4 of the earth surface is covered by the sea. A tiny fraction of that vast area would be enough to provide all the energy we need from the sun, sea waves, wind, or all three combined. ->
Until those changes happen, electric vehicles can help have a totally clean atmosphere inside the cities, where millions of people live and work. This alone, is enough to make our lives healthier!
Now for the optimists, there is also a possibility that cold-fusion has already been invented: Google the keywords: Andrea Rossi fusion facebook. If this is true, it will change everything sooner than you think!
@qp12qp there's a story of it working for a while, but overheating, cold apparently means something less than molten. thing is, if they're denied a patent because the patent office 'thinks' it won't work, they can simply demonstrate their functional prototype before the time limit is up, i believe in the states that it's a WHOLE YEAR, and get their patent. whether it works or not isn't important, they don't have the funding anymore, so it ain't happenin. look up thorium reactors.
@qp12qp and eventually everyone that believes burning fuel will be entirely replaced with electric will be history as well. carbon neutral fuels are a much more realistic goal, these things exist, unlike the magical 'better batteries' which don't. if you live in a place that has a charge port EVERYWHERE, then electrics may be practical. try alcohol made from fermented seaweed, carbon neutral fuel and the remains are usable as high quality animal/pofolk feed.
@qp12qp you should better investigate in how batteries packs are produced and what energy is needed to build them. The e-car is coming for sure. But the power source will still be a fuel-engine. And its better to have a engine like this which is giving 60kW power within 3k rotations a minute and only 1.6 Liters of fuel. That’s 1000 times better energy for the environment then a nuclear/coal/oil plant or even a solar panel. You do better calculations next time
How about the energy needed to build an internal combusion engine with hundreds of precision parts that need maintenance or even replacement vs an e-motor? The air-polution in the cities by burning unleaded gasoline 100% cancer source and the microparticles that are absorbed deeply into the human organism? How about the catalysts that during the warm period they let out all the deadly emissions and those that the owners haven't replaced for years due to high cost? ->(cont.)
(cont.)-> So we don't have the perfect battery yet, but for how long? Now that demand exceeds offer, everyone is researching for this. IBM develops a "lithium-air" battery 12 x higher density than li-ion! It's 9 mj/kg vs 47 of gasoline (Wiki), but due to i.c.e 15% vs e-motors 80%, the overal energy density is higher! So is it worth it to invest to a dead technology? Even for low-range city-cars, the immediate benefit of a clear atmosphere in the cities can't be beaten!
->(cont.) as for the "energy required to make the batteries", since development is still on the beginning, the final "super-battery" will most likely be recycled and will last for a long time, so the energy you're mentioning will be zeroed out.
I like hydrogen, but there are a few problems currently and the most important for me is the problematic storage: Hydrogen has the bad habbit of burning almost instantly vs gasoline and when you carry in your car the whole tank compressed in a pressure 330 times higher than your tires (!) the word "bomb" takes a new definition!
@qp12qp There is one huge problem with electric, and that is where it comes from. Solar panels for every car being electric is impossible, rare materials needed for them. Area for wind, etc. The best form is electric drive with ICE generation. Algae based biofuels means ease of storage and eco friendly.
Batteries=toxic chems, and where I live, coal power. Transmission lines are inefficient with their loss over the lines. Algae based is non toxic, no heavy chems, and can make it.
No, it's not impossible at all. There are infinite ways to make solar panels as there are to convert the sun's energy to electricity. They've used from bacteria for photosynthesis to "solar paint" for buildings.There are also many sources of green energy that could fulfill our needs for ever. It is silly to think that the whole planet has not enough renewable energy for us microbs! There is a non-toxic battery too. Everything that burns is dinosaur-tech, it's time to move forward.
@qp12qp Now you are speaking my language, since 2000 I have been wanting microbe based biofuels, specifically prokaryotic algaes. Nothing but sun to stored carbon. The main problem with solar direct to electrical is just the materials to make it, and batteries to store. Carbon footprint is huge. Biofuels are easy to store, no environmental problems, solar like you said, no toxins for production, and more.
Now this will really only be for ICE and mobility; others home power.
I think given enough space, you might be able to make a huge (e.g 10x larger) battery -same capacity and efficiency but environmentally friendly non-toxic, organic, recycled.
About biofuels they have caused mass hanger deaths in poor countries (millions) where they used food crops to produce biofuels which also made food products expensive So I'm against biofuels and anything that could replace the poor's need for food with the "developed" countries' need for energy.
@qp12qp Remember, I said Algae based biofuels. They are ideally suited for arid lands where agriculture is not possible as well as they use salt water and other non pottable water sources. I never liked food based. Not enough biomass. The tech also would help with nutritional needs of high poverty nations. Growth of protein etc rich algaes, fuel for the body instead. This is only for portable energy. Local large scale power grid still needs an effective alternative.
@qp12qp sorry to disagree but compressed stored air energy can be made as efficient as electric. if you convert back into mechanical energy. field winding in motors heat and wear out insulation, bearing gets hot.. heat is waste, waste is in everything, nothing is efficient if you really think of it... keep experimenting guys!
1] University of Berkley California (Economic and environmental evaluation of compressed-air cars): "Even under highly optimistic assumptions the compressed-air car is significantly less efficient than a battery electric vehicle and produces more greenhouse gas emissions than a conventional gas-powered car with a coal intensive power mix". That says it all. ->cont.
2] About "insulation wear" and "bearings getting hot": This is misleading. The truth is that a properly designed e-motor that works under specs, will last more than a lifetime, because with e-motors you only have to watch one parameter: Temperature. So even if you overload and overvoltage the motor way out of specs, if you take care of heat dissipation, there will be absolutely NO wear!
3) Try this with any other engine technology where you also have to deal with pressure, friction, lubrication, material strength, material corrosion and numerous other factors. An e-motor can have the windings on the stator, accessible to any cooling technique, the whole enclosure insulated from the environment, and the bearings running cold. Even with a stator temp of say 150oC, an insulating flange at each side would be enough to keep them cold! ->cont.
4) About efficiency, it is here already: 98% low power examples, 90% e-car motors and 98% high-power up to 1MW super-conductor ones. It is obvious, the next step will be 98-99% e-car motors.
Tesla-motors did a study of well-to-wheel efficiency that shows that their pure electric car beats all other approaches even with 50% coal-powered grid, and with less than half CO2 emissions of any gasoline car. Google Tesla_20060719.pdf
@qp12qp yeah but the sources of electricity, came from coal burning factories. just saying that the electricity is clean, but process of making is sometimes dirty. fortunately not as dirty as using gasoline.
You don't blame your hand for doing something wrong. We have the choice to invest and take all energy from renewable sources. If we don't do this, it's not electricity to blame.
@qp12qp I am guessing your first language is not english, is it? i never said anything, didnt blame anything o.o idk what you got from what i said but... i better not say anything else.
ps. if i could i would get myself an electric car.
Yes English is not my native language. What I meant is this: Many people say that electricity is not clean because it is mostly produced by coal. Well, this is a matter of choice, not a fact! Electricity does not depend on coal as hydrogen depends on water! We can produce all the electricity we need from any renewable sources. Instead of judging electricity and e-vehicles because of the dirty sources, better judge the politicians who prefer and promote those dirty sources.
@qp12qp Seriously? Electricity does not depend on coal? Hydrogen is only one form of energy storage, and obtaining it in efficient and clean way isn't easy - prolly the cleanest way requires solar energy and some help from nature (bacterium, algae). You could always go nuclear way, but is that a better way? All the energy we need from renewable sources? How? Solar panels? Not enough resources to produce that many panels. It's not that easy, and electric cars aren't yet a big step forward
Seriously, electricity doesn't depend on coal, oil, biofuel, or nuclear fission. Worldwide total average energy consumption =17TW with 20% renewables share! In worst case scenario exploiting just ONE source -the ocean waves with today's 39 MW/sq km, a sea area less than Montana US state could provide all the power the whole world needs today. Optimize the wave devices, combine sources and problem solved with far less area. Still, just ONE way out of infinite ways possible!
Even with the current dirty sources of electricity, there is still the immediate unbeatable advantage of a totally clean and healthy armosphere in the cities where we live and work, that only electric technolgy can offer (safely and efficiently), today!
@qp12qp Thats a little bit limmited in view point, the main reason that electricity isn't used in independant transit is as you say storage but also delivery.
For example the engin in my car engin produces a peek power output of 110kW, in aproximate electrical terms if the motors work at 1000volts(not very safe in the rain, also above the rateing of common used insulators) it would require 110 amps.
That would require min 7mm(probably more depending upon length) solid conductors (DC).
A], your car uses spark-plugs with a voltage >25000 volts and it's perfectly safe "in the rain"! A 1000V motor, will be 100% safe in all conditions, as it will be designed to be 100% safe. 110Amps @ 1000V is not limiting in any sense. (Chevy Volt uses one 110KW e-motor). By splitting the total power to 4 wheel-motors, you will have the best efficiency, each motor can be 27.5KW and your Amps and/or Volts will be much lower.
@qp12qp Hi , r.e. voltage, yes true my HID use quite high voltage, but both are very very low current. Also both have masses of safety fetures (like coil on plug so most of the wireing is low voltage).
r.e. Chevy volt, that is another lip service to green, 35miles electric range ?? 16kWh of battery
As you can see what you have said still is limmited. Maybe the best electric vihicle you havn't mentioned is the RV1 bus service , it runs on hydrogen fuel cells, and carrys up to 60 passengers.
Nobody said electric isn't limited today. This discussion started with my reply about the (near) future where I insisted it will be pure electric. Everything has been solved except the battery (which is under continuous, heavy development). Just wait a few years.
See my previous reply about hydrogen, it has serious storage problems. Too dangerous for masssive adoption.
A low range for electri-only mode, is natural for a hybrid. On hybrid mode though, it can go for 600 miles. I think the best pure electric are Tesla's cars. Ατ 55mph, the Model S can go 300miles with one charge (battery option for 160, 230, 300).
@qp12qp Secondly whilst I don't run at maximum output during motorway driving for example, I'm still using between 25 - 60 kW for cruising along the road, so a storage system that has 25kWh per hour of run time ?
Petrol has aproximatly 9.somthing kWh per liter (thats going to have a mass around 1kg) , I can hold 80 liters in my tank. 80x9.5 = 760kWh of energy stored in 80kg.
The engin runs between 20-30% efficiency. 20% of 760kW = 152kWh usable energy (its probably closer to 25%)
@qp12qp Thirdly , (I havent checked this in advance hope I don't drop a brick on my foot ;-)
G-Wiz uses 400 amp motor controler to run a 4.8kw motor(6.4hp), it's batterie is 8x 6volt 200Ah (48volt config afik) = 9.6kWh (Lead acid version 2nd gen). A Yuasa NPL200-6 fits the bill, mass 39kg x 8 = 312kg
Maximum motor eficiancy is probably ~80-90% lets say 90% = 8.64kWh usable.
17.6 times the quantatiy of usable energy stored in aproximatly 1/4 of the mass
B] While your car's engine is rated at peak power, e-motors are rated at continued power and they can have many times higher peak power and acceleration.With the lithium-air battery (a working prototype is expected next year) of 2.5kwh/kg you could actually have 80*2.5*0.9 =180kwh -and I haven't even taken account your engine's weight that is certainly much heavier than e-car's motor(s)! If that goes to production, it will be the end of I.C.E engines.
Interesting the complexity, and what the inventor must have had going on with his internal dialogue thinking it up from imagination, but at the same time it is far too complex to produce in any mass quantity or propose an automotive use. I have designed a motor with two major moving parts which is supercharged and capable of upwards of 40-50,000 RPM, and would be comperable in size to small rotary engine
How will it be cooled and oiled? Who will be able to recondition it when it wears? Those banana shaped pistons look so complicated to make so what is the point? Nowadays 16 valve turbo four cylinder engines can easily produce 100HP per litre and I sorry to say that Kugel-Motor vs Hayabusa looks no contest. I've had German vehicles in the past but to be 100% truthful British is best. "Kaput Durch Technik" is the problem (for example £57,000 cars whose 2-cogs-at-once gearboxes explode)
techdavey1000 52 minutes ago
Is there anyone out there kind enough to add english subs to this?
3vi14n931 4 hours ago
Toll aus 1.2 Liter 60Kw/82PS das geht heute auch mit der alten Hunkolben Technologie dafür braucht man keinen Kugelmotor. Der Wankel packt sogar mehr ohne Aufladung. Ich denke aber nicht das er Effizienter ist und vorallem schaut mal wo da die Zündkerzen sind, an der Seite, das ist aber nicht gerade Wartungsfreundlich. Ich denke der Kugelmotor geht in die Richtung Wankel, hoher Ölverbrauch und Spritverbrauch, aber dennoch weniger Leistung als Wankel!
Batner112 15 hours ago
judge people who are using an atom as a weapen
MsRumpelheinz 17 hours ago
mechanically brilliant however wont stand a chance against otto engies cause its just as the wankel engine way to complicated to service in car and there is still a problem of lubricating the "pistons" without burning oil...might be interesting for the use of hydrogen though cause if its local seperation of injektion an combustion wich allows the use of fuel with inhomogene mixture tendencies.....well....wankel engine does so to and comes with less moving parts
maggimann123 1 day ago
A little more promising than the Wankel engine. Although this motor could be plagued by the same problems as the wankelmotor.... this I mean expelling unburned fuel through the exhaust. Thus is an inefficient combustion cycle.
SaucyJake 1 day ago
вообще то это придумал наш инженер
stek96 1 day ago
Beatifull, but I must be an ass because don´t understand a shit of it. Pls see my invention that is more easy to learn , diesel motor 2 strokes by valves only without springs.
ricardojp07 4 days ago
ei was hot mo do denn alles weglo? was das denn für a dialekte?
tm868686 1 week ago
genial
peace
Geschmeidiggor 1 week ago
Not again please! Not another type of internal combustion engine. Let this kind of crap die in peace. It´s so outdated.
limpingdwarf 1 week ago
@limpingdwarf You got any better ideas?
Stealthsoldier20 1 week ago
@Stealthsoldier20 Yes I do.
limpingdwarf 1 week ago
@limpingdwarf Well enlighten us then! And by better ideas I do mean new ideas, incase you didn't pick up on that.
Stealthsoldier20 1 week ago
@Stealthsoldier20 I was teasing you. I thought my first remark was quite obvious. We already have a bunch of internal combustion engines. Al of them suffer the same kind of shortcomings. All of them widely known.
In fact of better knowledge we use the same old crap over and over. On top of that some guys think of another kind of internal combustion engine.
There is no need for new ideas, because the better ideas (also widely known) are already out there.
limpingdwarf 1 week ago
Fucking krauts. Jesus.
noncontradiction 1 week ago
Machining those components will make this type of engine prohibitively expensive.
rorybz 1 week ago
i could see it blowing itself apart if you tryed to run it
aterack833 1 week ago
We need to see it running. How nice it looks in drawings is rather irrelevant. I want to know if it gives a smooth power curve. Because from here it looks like it would stall with 50% load.
watzupdawg 2 weeks ago
mehr als 3000 U/min ist warscheinlich auch nicht drin :D dat is quatsch...
alexi077 2 weeks ago
give it 2 mazda rx8 plse
kamalmichael 2 weeks ago
Ich komme aus Deutschland und verstehe selber kein wort....
PaintSnake 2 weeks ago
@PaintSnake
Das ist Schweitzerich deutsch (zimlich nahe an rheinland deutsch,bayerisch deutsch oder östereischich deutsch: ich als Franzose verstehe ganz gut...
leneanderthalien 5 days ago
This engine has opposing pistons so in theory it should be 50% more powerful and Efficient .
It has no crank shaft it uses a cam system to convert pressure into torque directly into circular torque. there is not waste like in crank.
This looks extremely promising also compact.
MrDreamer3000 2 weeks ago
@MrDreamer3000
Actually all kinds of friction forces are applied to this engine. The whole power is applied to a few small ceramic balls, which roll inside grooves and make the pistons to reciprocate (in relation to each other) while turning and producing torque. Complex pistons (not cylindricall), surfaces and engine overall, Only if test results will be published incl. stress tests, efficiency, HP etc that prove 2B a LOT better than a conventional engine it will have some hope..
qp12qp 2 weeks ago
English is a good language...do u know?
tuloski 2 weeks ago
@tuloski I live in the netherlands 60km away from the german border...but even i cannot get used to the Scheiße language...
inventorrr 2 weeks ago
@tuloski you are a retard... did you know?
ChilliP112 2 weeks ago
It looks soo way complicated. Manifacturing and servicing could be a pain in the ass....
danieladamko 2 weeks ago 7
german is ugly
BvEHouten 3 weeks ago
@BvEHouten your mom is ugly
Pietschie123 3 weeks ago
Unta goo goo ga ga !
theoriginalguy11 3 weeks ago
If you want quite good batteries (LiFeYPo4) with a good cycle life (2.000 - 5.000), you can buy here:
Just search for LiFeYPo4 on google, and you'll find a shop to buy.
Salesorge 3 weeks ago
Spinner!
Salesorge 3 weeks ago
beste stelle 0:00
JBhighJeff 3 weeks ago
Is just me being blind or this video doesn't show it run?
lisikunique 3 weeks ago
@lisikunique
This is common with similar projects -too much fanfare, publicity and funding before it is even tested! Why run it and ruin everything? Everyone likes it as it is... as a beautiful ...thing! Where are all those great inventors who based everything to experiments? Now eveyone is happy if it runs on their PC! If it was me, I wouldn't show it to anyone, not even to my friends without making it work first!
qp12qp 3 weeks ago
@qp12qp I agree to each and every word of yours! If Wilbur Wright and Orville Wright lived nowadays they'd never fly, but we'd see tons of vids showing their inventions ;)
lisikunique 3 weeks ago
@lisikunique
Ok, I did a little search and there is one video showing it work on youtube: "Hüttlin-Kugelmotor auf dem Prüfstand", but no specs, efficiency, nothing.
qp12qp 3 weeks ago
The problem with electricity is that you need to produce it. Period.
PedraumF 4 weeks ago
@PedraumF
You don't produce anything. You just convert one form of energy to another using part of that energy for the conversion.
qp12qp 3 weeks ago
@qp12qp Yes yes, I was just joking about the top comment. "Nope! Future is only electric." Like if electrifying everything would just solve the efficiency problem of the world.
PedraumF 3 weeks ago
@PedraumF
and -let me add, it won't help bald men grow hair either.
qp12qp 3 weeks ago
unproper sealing, unproper cooling and heavy weight allways kill these "other" engines
RutinaRottis 4 weeks ago
уьш лебин даьккхан цхьайт тюм мелла 1айдис
tagir966 4 weeks ago
блять, где рабочий прототип?
s8006 4 weeks ago
60 kw bei 3000 Umdrehungen und einem 1,6 Liter Motor! Respekt! Das ist extrem effizient und umweltfreundlich. Strommotoren sind nur effektiv wenn die Batterien dies auch sind. Sie alle sollten sich lieber mal schlau machen was für die Herstellung von so einem Li-Ion Akku alles benötigt wird. Diese "Energiespeicher" der Zukunft müssten 4mal so lange halten wie sie es tut nur um als "umweltfreundlich" zu gelten. Der Motor hat Zukunft! und wenn nicht als antrieb dann als Energiequelle für E-KFZ
BluBla55 1 month ago
@qp12qp are you gay? Don't fucking speak
s14sr240silvia 1 month ago
otto copied the internal combustion engine of Brighi and Bersanti
215alessio 1 month ago
Isch däss jetzt schwyzzrdütsch oder schwäbisch???
HesseJamez 1 month ago
@HesseJamez garnichts von beiden!? lörrach ist in baden, das ist tiefbadisch
RedlightExpressMovie 1 month ago
@RedlightExpressMovie
Ich weiß, dass das Baden ist und würde auch nie einen Badenser als Schwaben bezeichnen. Hab 2 Jahre in Offenburg gelebt, aber der spricht irgendwie völlig anders - eher wie ein Schwyzzr. "Tiefbadisch" als eigene Sprache war mir bisher nicht geläufig.
HesseJamez 1 month ago
Check out The new engine Michigan state has developed. No battery needed to run an electric hy-brid. 5 times more efficiant than the most efficiant on the market today. New and awsom idea!!
gymmom67 1 month ago
@gymmom67
I saw the video "Norbert Mueller describes his wave disk generator", nice idea -it's a sort of a jet engine, but so simple and he couldn't manage to demonstrate? And how he knows it's efficiency beforehand, by software simulation? That's the way of academics-non-experimenters species. They usually fail. Still on theory-fantasy zone.
qp12qp 1 month ago
Guglmodor! Saacht er!
MucusFelidae 1 month ago
Genus!
ts5111 1 month ago
awesome design, but good god that has to be ridiculous to machine and talk about potential points of failure...
dzuari 1 month ago
The future street racing talk = So whats your ball running at? its just a 2 litre how about your ball?
xrivaldo 1 month ago
FUTURE!!
negatiff54 1 month ago
@negatiff54
Nope! Future is only electric. No internal combustion engine can be compared to a modern electric motor (highest efficiency, lightest, smallest, immediate and accurate response, full power at all speeds, lowest noise, no need for oxygen, no exhaust and pollution, lowest maintenance, highest longevity, highest reliability, just a single moving part).
It's the power source (batteries etc) that we are waiting to get better. Then, anything that burns fuel will be ancient history.
qp12qp 1 month ago 13
@qp12qp "no exhaust and pollution"
Except all the exhaust and pollution coming out of the power plant that provides the electricity to charge the car.
lexichronicle2 1 month ago
@lexichronicle2 Herad of fusion, wind or solar energy?
N3m3cis 1 month ago
@N3m3cis I have. But we don't have fusion power plants or any serious power from turbines. Solar panels are a joke in places like the UK.
My point is what's happening now and what will happen for the foreseeable few decades. Power will continue coming from fossil and fission sources.
I am all for your suggestion, but I dislike people selling things as 'green' when it's simply 'hidden'. Or a shit product, like 'green' white paint; which goes yellow.
lexichronicle2 1 month ago
@lexichronicle2 Good points, and i was bit hasty to go there. And besides few people seem to take on account the resources needed to build a new car and energy it takes while it's being produced. In my opinion we should really just cut back on our "need" to drive so much around. I know, not going to happen in the near future, but we should really take a closer look at our habbits and reasons for them...
N3m3cis 1 month ago
@lexichronicle2
See my reply to cnrmano
qp12qp 1 month ago
@qp12qp Where is all this electricity going to come from? Coal? Nuclear? We're going to be burning stuff for cars one way or another.
eyeinidas 1 month ago
@eyeinidas
See my reply to cnrmano
qp12qp 1 month ago
@qp12qp except the generators which produces electricity...coal, heavy oil is burnt mainly there
TheAllimania 1 month ago
@TheAllimania
See my reply to cnrmano
qp12qp 1 month ago
@qp12qp Where does electric come from? Over 70% of electric come from thermal power plants, which convert fuel to electric at the efficiency of 30%～40%. Internal combustion engine is currently-known most efficient thermal engine which can achieve 50% efficiency at most. Thus in SOME situations internal combustion engine means higher efficiency than pure electric-driven vehicles.
cnrmano 1 month ago
@cnrmano
It depends on where you take it from. You could take it from the sun, the wind, the earth (geothermal), the sea (sea waves and tidal energy), the rivers or waterfalls (hydroelectric).
However, the world-leading bankers' gang don't want you to take it from renewable sources. They want you to continuously consume non-renewable fuels and therefore continuously invest and borrow money from them. So electric comes from the puppets politicians who obey those bankers, the ones you vote.
qp12qp 1 month ago
@qp12qp I think power electronics can be improved further also!
TheKarlsruheprotest 1 month ago
@TheKarlsruheprotest
They will, with next generation super-conductors. They have already been used to make huge electric motors for navy many times smaller.
qp12qp 1 month ago
@qp12qp
If they could design it to run on hydrogen it could be better for the environment than all the batteries electric cars require.
scubadrew9292 1 month ago
@scubadrew9292
For hydrogen, a fuel cell + electric motor will be better than any combustion engine.
But as with all things, there is almost infinite ways to achieve the same result. Green and 100% recycled batteries are possible.
qp12qp 1 month ago
@qp12qp but that's boring. :P
alexcheetah79 1 month ago
@alexcheetah79
No, that's just *today's* illusion as it was when we first listened to a CD, playing without any hiss noise (compared to vinyl and tape), as it was when the first digital cameras released -with no film inside, "it will fail", "film will never die" (actually Kodak died who failed to see reality) etc etc. Now we are all happy and grateful for the amazing advantages that these technologies offer, even the most skeptists professionals. Less romantic, maybe, boring never!
qp12qp 1 month ago
@qp12qp Since all internal combustion engines can be retroengineered to work as pumps, maybe there's a use for this invention as a highly efficient pump.
Inimbrium 1 month ago
@qp12qp ill take an internal combustion engine over electric anyday... soz dude
Astonjnesbitt 1 month ago
@Astonjnesbitt
No problem, I understand. Keep in mind though that today, motors are still used to replace combustion engines in combustion-engine style vehicles. The next generations of electric vehicles will be designed specifically for electric motors, will exploit all their advantages and will extend the capabilities of today's vehicles in ways that most people can't even imagine (impossible for combustion engines). Then, -remember this: Even you will buy one!
qp12qp 1 month ago
@qp12qp Thats a good point, however ill still want a big noisy obnoxious powerful fast brutal engine thats soul purpose is performance not economy... YAY
Astonjnesbitt 1 month ago
@Astonjnesbitt
That will be fun, but with all that noise you won't hear an EQUALLY powerful e-vehicle passing you by like you were moving backwards! I'm not exaggerating, this is another advantage of e-motors: They can withstand (and deliver) huge amounts of extra power -until heat builds up while i.c.engines have a structural limit: If you do the same they will explode or get destroyed BEFORE they get hot! With future commercial superconductors guess what: No overheating at all!
qp12qp 1 month ago
@qp12qp So you already figured out what those manufacturers with billion dollars of investment, and professors that has 30 years of experience couldn't figure out... Congratulations. They should've asked you before carrying out all those alternatives.
By the way, leave my skeptism aside and make a little research about source of electricity and energy output levels of combustion and electron exchange.
trancepose 1 month ago
@trancepose
See my reply to @ruubjumper126.
qp12qp 1 month ago
@qp12qp did you read the wikipedia page about cold fusion?
trancepose 1 month ago
@trancepose
I did, briefly. A) the scientific community is against, since the inventor doesn't reveal how it works, until an intern. patent is issued. B) the patent office said it's not patendable because it "offends against the generally accepted laws of physics and established theories", which says a lot about the credibility of the patent offices and their motives! Just take a look at hundreds of approved inventions that range from UFOs to antigravity. Wiki "Energy Catalyzer".
qp12qp 1 month ago
@trancepose
One more thing -an advice: Try to think out of the box. You have a brain, not a tape recorder. Don't let others think for you, and don't judge what is right or wrong by averaging statistically what everyone else is doing -or not. Get the facts, research, and even better learn from history, to see the pattern: In 200 years we'll look to them as total primitives. Also, don't take into account everyone involved. There is just a bunch of inventors. Everyone else is copying!
qp12qp 1 month ago
@qp12qp so where does electricity come from!?
ruubjumper126 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
This has been flagged as spam show
@ruubjumper126
Again...
It depends on where you take it from. You could take it from the sun, wind, earth (geothermal), sea waves, tide, rivers, watefalls, or from all the green sources combined. Here is another idea: 3/4 of the earth surface is covered by the sea. A tiny fraction of that vast area would be enough to provide all the energy we need from the sun, sea waves, wind, or all three combined. ->
qp12qp 1 month ago
@ruubjumper126
-> (cont.)
Until those changes happen, electric vehicles can help have a totally clean atmosphere inside the cities, where millions of people live and work. This alone, is enough to make our lives healthier!
Now for the optimists, there is also a possibility that cold-fusion has already been invented: Google the keywords: Andrea Rossi fusion facebook. If this is true, it will change everything sooner than you think!
qp12qp 1 month ago
@qp12qp there's a story of it working for a while, but overheating, cold apparently means something less than molten. thing is, if they're denied a patent because the patent office 'thinks' it won't work, they can simply demonstrate their functional prototype before the time limit is up, i believe in the states that it's a WHOLE YEAR, and get their patent. whether it works or not isn't important, they don't have the funding anymore, so it ain't happenin. look up thorium reactors.
felderup 1 month ago
@qp12qp and eventually everyone that believes burning fuel will be entirely replaced with electric will be history as well. carbon neutral fuels are a much more realistic goal, these things exist, unlike the magical 'better batteries' which don't. if you live in a place that has a charge port EVERYWHERE, then electrics may be practical. try alcohol made from fermented seaweed, carbon neutral fuel and the remains are usable as high quality animal/pofolk feed.
felderup 1 month ago
@qp12qp you should better investigate in how batteries packs are produced and what energy is needed to build them. The e-car is coming for sure. But the power source will still be a fuel-engine. And its better to have a engine like this which is giving 60kW power within 3k rotations a minute and only 1.6 Liters of fuel. That’s 1000 times better energy for the environment then a nuclear/coal/oil plant or even a solar panel. You do better calculations next time
BluBla55 1 month ago
@BluBla55
How about the energy needed to build an internal combusion engine with hundreds of precision parts that need maintenance or even replacement vs an e-motor? The air-polution in the cities by burning unleaded gasoline 100% cancer source and the microparticles that are absorbed deeply into the human organism? How about the catalysts that during the warm period they let out all the deadly emissions and those that the owners haven't replaced for years due to high cost? ->(cont.)
qp12qp 4 weeks ago
@qp12qp
(cont.)-> So we don't have the perfect battery yet, but for how long? Now that demand exceeds offer, everyone is researching for this. IBM develops a "lithium-air" battery 12 x higher density than li-ion! It's 9 mj/kg vs 47 of gasoline (Wiki), but due to i.c.e 15% vs e-motors 80%, the overal energy density is higher! So is it worth it to invest to a dead technology? Even for low-range city-cars, the immediate benefit of a clear atmosphere in the cities can't be beaten!
qp12qp 4 weeks ago
@BluBla55
->(cont.) as for the "energy required to make the batteries", since development is still on the beginning, the final "super-battery" will most likely be recycled and will last for a long time, so the energy you're mentioning will be zeroed out.
qp12qp 4 weeks ago
@qp12qp water/hydrogen will nicely replace fossil fuel specially diesel
TheYTCable 4 weeks ago
@TheYTCable
I like hydrogen, but there are a few problems currently and the most important for me is the problematic storage: Hydrogen has the bad habbit of burning almost instantly vs gasoline and when you carry in your car the whole tank compressed in a pressure 330 times higher than your tires (!) the word "bomb" takes a new definition!
qp12qp 4 weeks ago
@qp12qp There is one huge problem with electric, and that is where it comes from. Solar panels for every car being electric is impossible, rare materials needed for them. Area for wind, etc. The best form is electric drive with ICE generation. Algae based biofuels means ease of storage and eco friendly.
Batteries=toxic chems, and where I live, coal power. Transmission lines are inefficient with their loss over the lines. Algae based is non toxic, no heavy chems, and can make it.
MarkusReese 3 weeks ago
@MarkusReese
No, it's not impossible at all. There are infinite ways to make solar panels as there are to convert the sun's energy to electricity. They've used from bacteria for photosynthesis to "solar paint" for buildings.There are also many sources of green energy that could fulfill our needs for ever. It is silly to think that the whole planet has not enough renewable energy for us microbs! There is a non-toxic battery too. Everything that burns is dinosaur-tech, it's time to move forward.
qp12qp 3 weeks ago
@qp12qp Now you are speaking my language, since 2000 I have been wanting microbe based biofuels, specifically prokaryotic algaes. Nothing but sun to stored carbon. The main problem with solar direct to electrical is just the materials to make it, and batteries to store. Carbon footprint is huge. Biofuels are easy to store, no environmental problems, solar like you said, no toxins for production, and more.
Now this will really only be for ICE and mobility; others home power.
MarkusReese 3 weeks ago
@MarkusReese
I think given enough space, you might be able to make a huge (e.g 10x larger) battery -same capacity and efficiency but environmentally friendly non-toxic, organic, recycled.
About biofuels they have caused mass hanger deaths in poor countries (millions) where they used food crops to produce biofuels which also made food products expensive So I'm against biofuels and anything that could replace the poor's need for food with the "developed" countries' need for energy.
qp12qp 3 weeks ago
@qp12qp Remember, I said Algae based biofuels. They are ideally suited for arid lands where agriculture is not possible as well as they use salt water and other non pottable water sources. I never liked food based. Not enough biomass. The tech also would help with nutritional needs of high poverty nations. Growth of protein etc rich algaes, fuel for the body instead. This is only for portable energy. Local large scale power grid still needs an effective alternative.
MarkusReese 1 week ago
@qp12qp sorry to disagree but compressed stored air energy can be made as efficient as electric. if you convert back into mechanical energy. field winding in motors heat and wear out insulation, bearing gets hot.. heat is waste, waste is in everything, nothing is efficient if you really think of it... keep experimenting guys!
6969smurfy 3 weeks ago
@6969smurfy
1] University of Berkley California (Economic and environmental evaluation of compressed-air cars): "Even under highly optimistic assumptions the compressed-air car is significantly less efficient than a battery electric vehicle and produces more greenhouse gas emissions than a conventional gas-powered car with a coal intensive power mix". That says it all. ->cont.
qp12qp 3 weeks ago
@6969smurfy
2] About "insulation wear" and "bearings getting hot": This is misleading. The truth is that a properly designed e-motor that works under specs, will last more than a lifetime, because with e-motors you only have to watch one parameter: Temperature. So even if you overload and overvoltage the motor way out of specs, if you take care of heat dissipation, there will be absolutely NO wear!
qp12qp 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
qp12qp 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@6969smurfy
3) Try this with any other engine technology where you also have to deal with pressure, friction, lubrication, material strength, material corrosion and numerous other factors. An e-motor can have the windings on the stator, accessible to any cooling technique, the whole enclosure insulated from the environment, and the bearings running cold. Even with a stator temp of say 150oC, an insulating flange at each side would be enough to keep them cold! ->cont.
qp12qp 3 weeks ago
@6969smurfy
4) About efficiency, it is here already: 98% low power examples, 90% e-car motors and 98% high-power up to 1MW super-conductor ones. It is obvious, the next step will be 98-99% e-car motors.
qp12qp 3 weeks ago
@qp12qp but are the sources of electricity all clean? :/
lasarousi 3 weeks ago
@lasarousi
Tesla-motors did a study of well-to-wheel efficiency that shows that their pure electric car beats all other approaches even with 50% coal-powered grid, and with less than half CO2 emissions of any gasoline car. Google Tesla_20060719.pdf
qp12qp 3 weeks ago
@qp12qp yeah but the sources of electricity, came from coal burning factories. just saying that the electricity is clean, but process of making is sometimes dirty. fortunately not as dirty as using gasoline.
lasarousi 3 weeks ago
@lasarousi
You don't blame your hand for doing something wrong. We have the choice to invest and take all energy from renewable sources. If we don't do this, it's not electricity to blame.
qp12qp 3 weeks ago
@qp12qp I am guessing your first language is not english, is it? i never said anything, didnt blame anything o.o idk what you got from what i said but... i better not say anything else.
ps. if i could i would get myself an electric car.
lasarousi 3 weeks ago
@lasarousi
Yes English is not my native language. What I meant is this: Many people say that electricity is not clean because it is mostly produced by coal. Well, this is a matter of choice, not a fact! Electricity does not depend on coal as hydrogen depends on water! We can produce all the electricity we need from any renewable sources. Instead of judging electricity and e-vehicles because of the dirty sources, better judge the politicians who prefer and promote those dirty sources.
qp12qp 3 weeks ago 15
@qp12qp very well said sir
krayzai174 1 week ago
@qp12qp wich is all controlled by the Opec from Saoudi arabia
APOLOnl 1 week ago
@qp12qp Seriously? Electricity does not depend on coal? Hydrogen is only one form of energy storage, and obtaining it in efficient and clean way isn't easy - prolly the cleanest way requires solar energy and some help from nature (bacterium, algae). You could always go nuclear way, but is that a better way? All the energy we need from renewable sources? How? Solar panels? Not enough resources to produce that many panels. It's not that easy, and electric cars aren't yet a big step forward
marshad82 1 week ago
@marshad82
Seriously, electricity doesn't depend on coal, oil, biofuel, or nuclear fission. Worldwide total average energy consumption =17TW with 20% renewables share! In worst case scenario exploiting just ONE source -the ocean waves with today's 39 MW/sq km, a sea area less than Montana US state could provide all the power the whole world needs today. Optimize the wave devices, combine sources and problem solved with far less area. Still, just ONE way out of infinite ways possible!
qp12qp 1 week ago
@lasarousi
Even with the current dirty sources of electricity, there is still the immediate unbeatable advantage of a totally clean and healthy armosphere in the cities where we live and work, that only electric technolgy can offer (safely and efficiently), today!
qp12qp 3 weeks ago
@qp12qp Unless you generate electricity with fossil fuel.
eyeinidas 2 weeks ago
@qp12qp then lets hope the oil companies don't know about them, they might want to stop battery improvements...
flippynl 3 weeks ago
@flippynl
Better hope they won't buy ALL battery patents, as they have bought several already!
qp12qp 3 weeks ago
@qp12qp Thats a little bit limmited in view point, the main reason that electricity isn't used in independant transit is as you say storage but also delivery.
For example the engin in my car engin produces a peek power output of 110kW, in aproximate electrical terms if the motors work at 1000volts(not very safe in the rain, also above the rateing of common used insulators) it would require 110 amps.
That would require min 7mm(probably more depending upon length) solid conductors (DC).
stu0things0and0stuff 3 weeks ago
@stu0things0and0stuff
A], your car uses spark-plugs with a voltage >25000 volts and it's perfectly safe "in the rain"! A 1000V motor, will be 100% safe in all conditions, as it will be designed to be 100% safe. 110Amps @ 1000V is not limiting in any sense. (Chevy Volt uses one 110KW e-motor). By splitting the total power to 4 wheel-motors, you will have the best efficiency, each motor can be 27.5KW and your Amps and/or Volts will be much lower.
qp12qp 3 weeks ago
@qp12qp Hi , r.e. voltage, yes true my HID use quite high voltage, but both are very very low current. Also both have masses of safety fetures (like coil on plug so most of the wireing is low voltage).
r.e. Chevy volt, that is another lip service to green, 35miles electric range ?? 16kWh of battery
As you can see what you have said still is limmited. Maybe the best electric vihicle you havn't mentioned is the RV1 bus service , it runs on hydrogen fuel cells, and carrys up to 60 passengers.
stu0things0and0stuff 3 weeks ago
@stu0things0and0stuff
Nobody said electric isn't limited today. This discussion started with my reply about the (near) future where I insisted it will be pure electric. Everything has been solved except the battery (which is under continuous, heavy development). Just wait a few years.
See my previous reply about hydrogen, it has serious storage problems. Too dangerous for masssive adoption.
qp12qp 3 weeks ago
@stu0things0and0stuff
A low range for electri-only mode, is natural for a hybrid. On hybrid mode though, it can go for 600 miles. I think the best pure electric are Tesla's cars. Ατ 55mph, the Model S can go 300miles with one charge (battery option for 160, 230, 300).
qp12qp 3 weeks ago
@qp12qp Secondly whilst I don't run at maximum output during motorway driving for example, I'm still using between 25 - 60 kW for cruising along the road, so a storage system that has 25kWh per hour of run time ?
Petrol has aproximatly 9.somthing kWh per liter (thats going to have a mass around 1kg) , I can hold 80 liters in my tank. 80x9.5 = 760kWh of energy stored in 80kg.
The engin runs between 20-30% efficiency. 20% of 760kW = 152kWh usable energy (its probably closer to 25%)
stu0things0and0stuff 3 weeks ago
@qp12qp Thirdly , (I havent checked this in advance hope I don't drop a brick on my foot ;-)
G-Wiz uses 400 amp motor controler to run a 4.8kw motor(6.4hp), it's batterie is 8x 6volt 200Ah (48volt config afik) = 9.6kWh (Lead acid version 2nd gen). A Yuasa NPL200-6 fits the bill, mass 39kg x 8 = 312kg
Maximum motor eficiancy is probably ~80-90% lets say 90% = 8.64kWh usable.
17.6 times the quantatiy of usable energy stored in aproximatly 1/4 of the mass
Thats why petroleum is so good.
stu0things0and0stuff 3 weeks ago
@stu0things0and0stuff
B] While your car's engine is rated at peak power, e-motors are rated at continued power and they can have many times higher peak power and acceleration.With the lithium-air battery (a working prototype is expected next year) of 2.5kwh/kg you could actually have 80*2.5*0.9 =180kwh -and I haven't even taken account your engine's weight that is certainly much heavier than e-car's motor(s)! If that goes to production, it will be the end of I.C.E engines.
qp12qp 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
qp12qp 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@stu0things0and0stuff
C) So the difference is, that electric car technology is developing fast, while internal combustion engine tech have reached it's limits.
BTW check out the new Tesla Model S with room for up to 7 people, 0-60mph in 4.4 secs and up to 85kwh!
qp12qp 3 weeks ago
@qp12qp feal free to come back with some interesting ideas :-)
p.s. Hydrogen is pritty good too.
stu0things0and0stuff 3 weeks ago
sorry going back over to the other side of you tube. Must have opened the wrong door again
LaRobertos 1 month ago
is that an engine?
ELFHUNTER50 1 month ago
simple, is often better sadly
RW1LD 1 month ago
Nope. Too much energy lost
p71280 1 month ago 2
very interesting ...
d7me 1 month ago
0:46 is what you came for
tyson01mx 1 month ago
Interesting the complexity, and what the inventor must have had going on with his internal dialogue thinking it up from imagination, but at the same time it is far too complex to produce in any mass quantity or propose an automotive use. I have designed a motor with two major moving parts which is supercharged and capable of upwards of 40-50,000 RPM, and would be comperable in size to small rotary engine
Gohot229 1 month ago
@Gohot229
Let's see it =)
As far as this motor goes, yup it's far too complex... how do you go about fixing something like that....
Cokoholicar 1 month ago
Could someone explain this to me, in english?
Oshyrath 1 month ago
Ja herzlichen Glückwunsch, wir wollen alle Wasserstoff und Stromautos und du baust immernoch an einen Verbrennermotor.
SuperMalinge 1 month ago 2
can you imagine the cost to replace parts? I don't want to sell my house.
walperstyle 1 month ago
I don't know if I typed correctly "weinig komplese bau taile" at 2:09 compared to Otto engine...
Yeah sure, just look at the model of that spheric engine! That is 100x times more complex that regular car engine (Otto or Diesel!!!)
The true simple, efficient and non pollutant engine is a electric engine PERIOD!!!
NinjaTTT 1 month ago
@NinjaTTT Big oil sucks.
p71280 1 month ago
@EDEK77TAR Du hast scheinbar kein plan sowas nennt sich Akzent.
headhunterz33 1 month ago
was für ne sprache! red doch mal normal du HOMO
EDEK77TAR 1 month ago
wanna see a working one!!! just show videos about how it works is fair, to understand how it works.... but now, wanna see it working!
MrPafleouf 1 month ago
Fire that bitch up ! WTF!?
nateames76 1 month ago
Охуенно
vvem 1 month ago
This guy has the strangest accent in his german.
robertoo01 1 month ago
@robertoo01
The guy is swiss, not a native German.
HesseJamez 1 month ago
@HesseJamez no, he was born in steinen, Germany ;-)
Schneiderbeck2 1 month ago
@HesseJamez : Nicht zutreffend!
N9155E 1 month ago
In an interview with cars21.com, April 2011, they state 34% efficiency and 20% reduction in fuel consumption over a 2-liter inline four.
My question is: can it maintain that for 200,000 km?
coplander101 1 month ago
But will it blend?
mungent25 1 month ago
so, this engine fires like a rotary engine would, twice in one cycle ??
fixitdude74 1 month ago
Ein technisches Wunderwerk, bemerkenswert welcher Aufwand in die Entwicklung gesteckt wird.
Lunte10 1 month ago
Respekt an den Erfinder, sehr interessant bin schon gespannt wann wir uns im KFZ Sektor sehen!
Semislick100 1 month ago
Looks cool, but does it work?
turbo99camaro 1 month ago
Looks like a lot to break, not to bash it or anything - but the best of machination are often the most simple.
fateephat 1 month ago
1,2 Litre and 60kw=82hp @ 3000rpm
GianfrancoVIsano 1 month ago
1,2 Litre and 60kw=82hp and allmost 3000nm of torque. Is that correct (does not sound right tho) all you German speaking?
Xaevi 1 month ago
same issue as the rotary??? compression lost after milleage + high cost part production??i'm currious
alexandre666a 1 month ago
der typ wird millionär wenn nicht milliardär
SuperOHM99 1 month ago
Well I understood every word of what he was saying ... NOT
PattayaBen 1 month ago