in archimedes' time, the king ordered someone to make a crown from a brick of gold. then the crown is made and when they check it, the mass of a standard brick of gold is equal to the mass of the crown. but archimedes doubt that the crown is not made of pure gold. in the end, he placed both objects, the brick and the crown, in a container with the same amount of water. the crown displaces more water than the gold. i thought that the mass of an object is equal to the mass of water displaced.
Ah. So and the significance of the name Archimedes makes this ever so relevant.
But I gotta say this is though basic chemistry, its applications are useful when extended to nautical engineering. Also, I have to admit that I came across this video after watching "Meet the Medic", which have no relevance to science but in particular mad science! LOL! And video games.
This can be used to show how full scale boat lifts (with water in them) work even if the lifting ram is just in the centre and the boat moves. Great physics - keep up the good work!
Great video! As will all physics just doing the maths is not enough! It would be good if it explained why the water is displaced and the block sinks in to a certain depth! Some understanding of pressure and particle motion is required. I will give you all an example to demonstrate - if you hang a rectangular tank half full of water from its midpoint (over the centre of mass) and place a floating boat in the tank - even if it (gently) moves to the left or right the tank does not tip....
In fact, i'm not understand this pirinciple thoroughly.
My question: The actual weight of an object is 12N. The apparent weight of the object when it is immersed in water is 9N. What is the density of the object?
Can anyone help me to solve this question??? Thanks.
i don't get it-shudn't the weight of displaced fluid, when you put the stone on the block, be equal to the sum of the weights of block and the stone? how come the weight of displaced fluid equal to just the weight of the stone?
The weight of the "displaced" water must equal the block for it to float. The displaced water is effectively pushing against the block to retain the space from which it was displaced. This results inan upwardly force called buoyancy.
As the block is much less dense than the water then only part of the box will sink ie the volume of the block which equals the same weight as the water.
Because the block is less dense than the water it sits in.
Density = Mass/Volume
Thus, Mass=Density(Volume).
The weight of the volume of water displaced by the block equals the weight of the block. Since the block is less dense than the water a smaller volume of water has more mass than an equal volume of the block. Since only half the block submerged this suggests that the block is half as dense as the water.
You gave me the image of the clever grandpa or uncle I always wanted to have who fascinates his grandchildren, nephews and nieces about the basic laws of nature, the stars, etc... With a reliable knowledge where even their teachers in school can have a lesson from... And that impression is great!!
Your (grand)children, if you have them, are blessed with such a teacher in life.
what happens when you have two cubes of the same volume but different density that completely sink ?
A brick of iron in that tub will displace the same amount of water as a brick of gold, even though their density is different, when both are at the bottom of the tub.
Seams to only work with floating object, or using floating object as a pressure pad.
How would you measure the density of a cube of gold while a cube of iron will sink just as well? By placing it on a piece of wood?
The buoyant force acting on an object completely submerged in water equals the weight of the displaced water. In this example the volume of the displaced water equals the volume of the brick.
Both the gold and iron bricks will experience the same buoyant force (assuming they are the same volume). The net force down (force of gravity - buoyant force) acting on the gold block will be greater because it is denser, therefore heavier, then the iron brick). .....
"The buoyant force acting on an object completely submerged in water equals the weight of the displaced water."
if i had both a solid iron brick and a hollow thin shell brick (with air inside) both of the same volume, would they experience the same buoyant force when completely submerged?
AFAIK, the buoyant force would be the same. Although the hollow thin shell brick requires much less force to push it upwards (therefore it floats). You need to manually sink it and then it will push the required amount of water (as presented in the video).
theoretically, will an evacuated balloon (vacuum inside) rise? (if the evacuated space is light an rigid to preserve its volume and not be crashed)
What about a balloon filled with the same composition and temperature of plasma as in the upper layers of the ionosphere(rather then hot air) will it rise? and if it does will it reach the ionosphere?
Assuming that a balloon would survive such flight, it would rise as long as its mass would be less than the mass of the particles it displaces around (for example: air in the lower atmosphere). It would reach equilibrium at some height and then stop rising. The substance it's filled with would only affect its final height (with vacuum giving the best result). Hard to tell right away what composition would give what final height, but you get the idea, I hope ^^
(its also a bit confusing at first glance because vacuum is low pressure while hot air is high pressure, so in one case we heat air and in the other we evacuate it. although vacuum is matter that is very far apart it doesn't have the pressure inside that a heated gas does right? so is it even similar in principle? i mean super hot, super low density high pressure gas vs vacuum.
It's not the pressure inside balloon that makes it fly, but its overall mass that displaces air. Making something inside of a balloon (usually a gas) hotter just means that its density will decrease thus reducing the mass of the interior. The balloon with vacuum inside was only an example (it would inflate). But the point is that the buoyancy is dependent on the mass inside a container. It's explained here: en . wikipedia . org/wiki/Buoyancy#Density (remove all 4 spaces between the 2 dots).
so how do i make a vacuum balloon float and rise? if i just took a regular balloon and evacuated it with a vacuum pump it would not rise, it will shrink like a resin because the outside pressure is so much greater right? would it help if i evacuated some kind of a reinforced balloon that would attempt to hold its walls from structural collapse like a glass flask but much lighter. any ideas on how to make a vacuum balloon that rises at least a bit?
You need a material that will preserve its volume when evacuated. And this is a broad topic of material science. You would need a material strong enough to sustain high vacuum volume and light enough to actually float. Google for "vacuum balloon" - it gives some interesting links.
What this method measures is the VOLUME. You calculate mass by multiplying volume and density. Two different bricks of metal may have the same volume (and this method will show it) despite that they might have different densities (and therefore different masses).
i showed this to my science teacher. he loved it!
krzie18 4 months ago
in archimedes' time, the king ordered someone to make a crown from a brick of gold. then the crown is made and when they check it, the mass of a standard brick of gold is equal to the mass of the crown. but archimedes doubt that the crown is not made of pure gold. in the end, he placed both objects, the brick and the crown, in a container with the same amount of water. the crown displaces more water than the gold. i thought that the mass of an object is equal to the mass of water displaced.
nnesguerra02 4 months ago
Excellent lessons !!!
codewalters 6 months ago
Thank you for adding this video !!!!!!!
santoshdc100 6 months ago
Cool! Thanks for this upload.
0x96C 6 months ago
Ah. So and the significance of the name Archimedes makes this ever so relevant.
But I gotta say this is though basic chemistry, its applications are useful when extended to nautical engineering. Also, I have to admit that I came across this video after watching "Meet the Medic", which have no relevance to science but in particular mad science! LOL! And video games.
UniversalVision 7 months ago
This can be used to show how full scale boat lifts (with water in them) work even if the lifting ram is just in the centre and the boat moves. Great physics - keep up the good work!
silenthorsewhisperer 8 months ago
Great video! As will all physics just doing the maths is not enough! It would be good if it explained why the water is displaced and the block sinks in to a certain depth! Some understanding of pressure and particle motion is required. I will give you all an example to demonstrate - if you hang a rectangular tank half full of water from its midpoint (over the centre of mass) and place a floating boat in the tank - even if it (gently) moves to the left or right the tank does not tip....
silenthorsewhisperer 8 months ago
I'm in grade 8, and i have a test coming up about this. but it was too much info, but fun to learn! i totally get it, and now im ready! thanks!
ugotmeggedhardcore 9 months ago
good and well detailed video, this helped me with my project thanks!
canadianslang 11 months ago
that horse is overweight....
babblingmonster1802 11 months ago
this is the wealth of Greece!
becurbilyg 11 months ago
Please make more explaining videos abaut physics (mechanics).
flunerClay 1 year ago
weight of the body immersed in water=buoyant force...then y do some objects
(like needles n paper etc) sink in water??they should remain in equilibrium if their weight=buoyant force.......
Xukhruff 1 year ago
this guys voice is so relaxing lol
qwerty2000000 1 year ago
Which direction would a helium filled ballon travel inside the space shuttle?
jimbisonlinenow 1 year ago
this sooo helped me on my homework
cycon666 1 year ago
thank you, youtube, for doing my homework for me :)
ngirlrock 1 year ago
THE BEST VIDEO EVER! THANK YOU SO MUCH!
seattleunited 1 year ago
In fact, i'm not understand this pirinciple thoroughly.
My question: The actual weight of an object is 12N. The apparent weight of the object when it is immersed in water is 9N. What is the density of the object?
Can anyone help me to solve this question??? Thanks.
kengyingying 1 year ago
great video
4JWM 1 year ago
Now i understand it, very good vid. Thanks
gilliantje 1 year ago
i don't get it-shudn't the weight of displaced fluid, when you put the stone on the block, be equal to the sum of the weights of block and the stone? how come the weight of displaced fluid equal to just the weight of the stone?
minsatminsat 1 year ago
i no 1 part of my exam im not failing...
r0naldinh010 1 year ago
Horray!
Varias veces después de haberlo llevado en la escuela, finalmente lo he comprendido..
sanwihuelin 1 year ago
Great Vid. Thanks a lot. It helps.
TheAviationArt 2 years ago 2
but why if only half the block is submerged the full weight is displaced
powercord123456 2 years ago
Block has a force down called weight.
The weight of the "displaced" water must equal the block for it to float. The displaced water is effectively pushing against the block to retain the space from which it was displaced. This results inan upwardly force called buoyancy.
As the block is much less dense than the water then only part of the box will sink ie the volume of the block which equals the same weight as the water.
Example
water = 1g/cm3
box 0.25g/cm3
1/4of the block will sink
bubbliejock 2 years ago
Because the block is less dense than the water it sits in.
Density = Mass/Volume
Thus, Mass=Density(Volume).
The weight of the volume of water displaced by the block equals the weight of the block. Since the block is less dense than the water a smaller volume of water has more mass than an equal volume of the block. Since only half the block submerged this suggests that the block is half as dense as the water.
Exception88 2 years ago
Bravo!
darknidevle89 2 years ago
Fantastic vid .. thts wonderful !
meedoselecao 2 years ago
prety good
tobby2468 2 years ago
that`s great
thanx
engpolo1 2 years ago
thanks!!
mandassux 2 years ago
You gave me the image of the clever grandpa or uncle I always wanted to have who fascinates his grandchildren, nephews and nieces about the basic laws of nature, the stars, etc... With a reliable knowledge where even their teachers in school can have a lesson from... And that impression is great!!
Your (grand)children, if you have them, are blessed with such a teacher in life.
Maartenn100 2 years ago 23
very informative. great video.
darksideofthebrick13 2 years ago
cool vids, thank you
clownstangler 2 years ago
thats awesome.....
Rowe2597 2 years ago
Thanks man. Nice video
Brutalexecution 2 years ago
I love these videos. You learn more with these than sitting in a classroom sometimes. I wish all science was like this.
Jiosonus 2 years ago 35
I did it!! I'm best, I'm genius! Or... I guess it wasn't that hard... ;)
Great video, Hilaroad!
Thymonico 2 years ago
Thank you very much for the videos. I hope you continue posting. They help to fuel my newfound interest in science and motivate me to learn more.
victorscope 2 years ago
Great Videos...
jonce81 2 years ago
nice
RestauranteChines 2 years ago
what happens when you have two cubes of the same volume but different density that completely sink ?
A brick of iron in that tub will displace the same amount of water as a brick of gold, even though their density is different, when both are at the bottom of the tub.
Seams to only work with floating object, or using floating object as a pressure pad.
How would you measure the density of a cube of gold while a cube of iron will sink just as well? By placing it on a piece of wood?
heratioalundi 2 years ago
The buoyant force acting on an object completely submerged in water equals the weight of the displaced water. In this example the volume of the displaced water equals the volume of the brick.
Both the gold and iron bricks will experience the same buoyant force (assuming they are the same volume). The net force down (force of gravity - buoyant force) acting on the gold block will be greater because it is denser, therefore heavier, then the iron brick). .....
ScienceOnline 2 years ago 2
Placing the brick on floating wood displaces a weight of water equal to the weight of the brick.
ScienceOnline 2 years ago
"The buoyant force acting on an object completely submerged in water equals the weight of the displaced water."
if i had both a solid iron brick and a hollow thin shell brick (with air inside) both of the same volume, would they experience the same buoyant force when completely submerged?
heratioalundi 2 years ago
Yes, but you might have to push and hold the hollow one under water. This happens when the buoyant force exceeds the weight of the object.
ScienceOnline 2 years ago
AFAIK, the buoyant force would be the same. Although the hollow thin shell brick requires much less force to push it upwards (therefore it floats). You need to manually sink it and then it will push the required amount of water (as presented in the video).
timonczesq 2 years ago
theoretically, will an evacuated balloon (vacuum inside) rise? (if the evacuated space is light an rigid to preserve its volume and not be crashed)
What about a balloon filled with the same composition and temperature of plasma as in the upper layers of the ionosphere(rather then hot air) will it rise? and if it does will it reach the ionosphere?
heratioalundi 2 years ago
Assuming that a balloon would survive such flight, it would rise as long as its mass would be less than the mass of the particles it displaces around (for example: air in the lower atmosphere). It would reach equilibrium at some height and then stop rising. The substance it's filled with would only affect its final height (with vacuum giving the best result). Hard to tell right away what composition would give what final height, but you get the idea, I hope ^^
timonczesq 2 years ago
yes i do, thanks :)
hmm, vacuum balloon..... is it even tangible?
(its also a bit confusing at first glance because vacuum is low pressure while hot air is high pressure, so in one case we heat air and in the other we evacuate it. although vacuum is matter that is very far apart it doesn't have the pressure inside that a heated gas does right? so is it even similar in principle? i mean super hot, super low density high pressure gas vs vacuum.
heratioalundi 2 years ago
It's not the pressure inside balloon that makes it fly, but its overall mass that displaces air. Making something inside of a balloon (usually a gas) hotter just means that its density will decrease thus reducing the mass of the interior. The balloon with vacuum inside was only an example (it would inflate). But the point is that the buoyancy is dependent on the mass inside a container. It's explained here: en . wikipedia . org/wiki/Buoyancy#Density (remove all 4 spaces between the 2 dots).
timonczesq 2 years ago
It would DEFLATE, I meant.
timonczesq 2 years ago
so how do i make a vacuum balloon float and rise? if i just took a regular balloon and evacuated it with a vacuum pump it would not rise, it will shrink like a resin because the outside pressure is so much greater right? would it help if i evacuated some kind of a reinforced balloon that would attempt to hold its walls from structural collapse like a glass flask but much lighter. any ideas on how to make a vacuum balloon that rises at least a bit?
heratioalundi 2 years ago
You need a material that will preserve its volume when evacuated. And this is a broad topic of material science. You would need a material strong enough to sustain high vacuum volume and light enough to actually float. Google for "vacuum balloon" - it gives some interesting links.
timonczesq 2 years ago
What this method measures is the VOLUME. You calculate mass by multiplying volume and density. Two different bricks of metal may have the same volume (and this method will show it) despite that they might have different densities (and therefore different masses).
timonczesq 2 years ago
As always, I greatly enjoyed your video.
M3n747 2 years ago
It would've been great having these videos when I was in school back in the 80's!!
Another great video.
vissvienna 2 years ago 3
Please post more vids on Youtube! Thank You!
Demoman42 2 years ago 3
MIND=BLOWN
BryanBeatsYouAll 2 years ago 3
i got 1544.08 POUNDS
that was cool.
crxracer420 2 years ago
!!!!
sctrep 2 years ago
oh and thx for the vid , realy interesting like always :D
LordMonSeigneur 2 years ago
thats a big horse!
Peacenik 2 years ago
Not Really ud be surprised how much a horse weighs
shadowhunter45s 2 years ago
lol that's not a big horse
lmeister3 2 years ago
THANKS <3
Love ScienceOnline.
leolava 2 years ago
loved it, thx again !
lejink 2 years ago
1,600 lbs?
RDJim 2 years ago
yup 1587 lbs
LordMonSeigneur 2 years ago
Very good!
DeaconSwayne 2 years ago 2
I love these videos :D
xazuross 2 years ago 5