in high school, during a music trip through europe, we took a day trip into germany and koopman played this for our group while we were standing right up near him, 11 years later and i can still feel the pedal notes
Koopman's interpretations are so fearless. When you think you've heard every appreciable rendition of one of the era's warhorses, leave it to Ton Koopman to throw you a bone.
@FuerzaDeNoche Hey shit for brains, it is the original key. When the organ was built not all organs were tuned to the same pitch. Get a freakin education. It sounds like it is E minor but watch the video its clearly being played in D minor...
Nice Performance! My one comment is that it is in the wrong key - E minor rather than D minor. I don't know whether it is the instument or Mr. Koopman. I presume it the organ because Mr. Koopman introduced the piece as being in D minor. Thank you Ton and SoliDeoGloria8550!
Sorry... yo no cre oqeu bach estuviera todo el tiempo en nirvana con su musica... bach tambien tenia emocion y cometia errores, y si queria ornamentaba a la francesa o a su particular estilo.... quien de vosotros sos musicologos, calvecinistas y organistas??? ....
@violinistx100 the dynamics of a organ are control by the organ stops, when you use more organ stops the organ sounds more louder , sorry for my English !!!!
Hey! Here we go with the wonderful possibilities of the internet anno christi 2010. You can refuse all accesible knowledge including Bach's own son's and say: Koopman ist wrong! You guys are wrong! Boy...that must feel good:-D
...solideo ....thanks for posting this recording.:-)
No, it is just being played on an historic instrument which is tuned to a higher pitch than the modern standard of A440 which is a 20th century invention.
Quys this is stylus phantasticus that means freedom expression,rethorical etc,not stict to the meter and not bound at the articulation of the meter.
It is is played much different that chorales or other strict baroque piece,Koopman sure know much more than us or anyone out there he has studies and understood the sources before all of us were born
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Go and compare it with Richters rendition. Zd_oIFy1mxM
Koopman has an overall sloppy, weak and spoilt keyboard expression. Richters rendition is a powerful german lutheran statement. In Koopmans rendition you hear in every detail the dutch flippancy.
Richter plays in a Romantic, Neo-Classical style. Koop plays in the early Baroque style, of Buxtehude. The differences being that baroque music focuses more on intellectual craftsmanship, so to a romantic/modern ear it will appear distasteful. It's never a wise to compare Richter and Koopman in my opinion, as they are two entirely different worlds. I accept, respect and admire them both. But I understand what you mean though.
Also Koopman's techniques are very sophisticated and refined.
I do not believe in essays and manuscripts written even by CPE. I believe in the character, in the artistical message and expression of music. And BWV 669-689 tell me that you and Koopman are wrong. Maybe the stylus phantasticus can be applied to the early Bach but I am sure it is a great mistake to apply it to the late Bach of Leipzig. Koopman's Bach is not GERMAN and it is not LUTHERAN. You can not separate the lutheran way of life in Bachs time from his music.
Once more you try to label the Bachs area with incorrect concepts. The label "baroque" for a whole age is an invention of the late 19 th century. Bach himself did not live in the age of "Baroque", the scientists who believe in manuscripts and essays labeled him as a"baroque" composer 150 years after his death. Which is highly incorrect. I refuse to analyze, evaluate and perceive Bachs music in the restricted categories of the so called baroque area.
Wow, love to see his electrified fingers and body while he is playing, with all his remaining hairs to stand up to greet us ... magnificent !
cestmamusique 7 months ago 2
Execuse me where this palace is located
THEMrTNMUSIC 7 months ago
come on he is just playing at the tempo he likes, if you like it or not is your problem
jeyendeoso 8 months ago
i wonder why peope don't liek the tempo?
did bach wrote how fast it must be?
martin791017 8 months ago
Dislike. The first 70 seconds just irritates my ears.
I4AM4NAME 9 months ago
So free and electricfying, a full version please ...
cestmamusique 9 months ago
You can tell the organs a badass instrument when you look at how many foot pedals there are... TOO MANY
Morphae 9 months ago
PERFECT......BUT TOO FAST-.... DONT LIKE
8arcangel 9 months ago
in high school, during a music trip through europe, we took a day trip into germany and koopman played this for our group while we were standing right up near him, 11 years later and i can still feel the pedal notes
jlaw1981pbo 9 months ago
Comment removed
jlaw1981pbo 9 months ago
Comment removed
jlaw1981pbo 9 months ago
Comment removed
jlaw1981pbo 9 months ago
what's the difference between the three keyboards?
violinistx100 10 months ago
@violinistx100
each keyboard controls a different set of pipes
jlaw1981pbo 9 months ago
@violinistx100
You can't hear a difference?
Surtak 9 months ago
The roof looks like St Thomaskirche. Is it actually?
gustavyeung 10 months ago
1:02 is epic!
Hellofbamser 10 months ago
I think it was too fast.....
MegaDani141 11 months ago
1:54 I think I heard a sloppy key (a mistake)
kknots 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kknots Quoted from an earlier comment:
"no, he don't picked up any wrong notes. koopman never makes mistaks. he uses the "ringk manuscript" that isn't comparable to modern editions"
citizenhal 10 months ago
1:01 - Ton Koopman motorboats the camera.
mattdd05 11 months ago
By far the darkest and heaviest song I have ever heard in my life. Amazingly dark.
mattdd05 11 months ago
perfect but very annoying rendition
petrus60687 11 months ago
I prefer Karl Richter playing
TonyWRO 11 months ago
Koopman's interpretations are so fearless. When you think you've heard every appreciable rendition of one of the era's warhorses, leave it to Ton Koopman to throw you a bone.
ianwfirestone 1 year ago
@ 1:10 ...epic........sounds so familiar....mike oldfield has copied this part ..... tubular bells :)
Kaspersche0815 1 year ago
Where's the fugue?!?
I need it!?!
Cacophony89 1 year ago
I love his trills, he always add some trills (A) love them .. he make ma a PROUD Hollander (A) .. he is an amazing preformer ! stunning !
Darkboy2525 1 year ago
man this i s a nice performance but i think its not in the original key it kinda annoys me...
FuerzaDeNoche 1 year ago
@FuerzaDeNoche Hey shit for brains, it is the original key. When the organ was built not all organs were tuned to the same pitch. Get a freakin education. It sounds like it is E minor but watch the video its clearly being played in D minor...
Afaral1989 1 year ago
@Afaral1989 What if you calm down? In this case you're the one who needs a 'freakin education'.
starbreez3 1 year ago
@starbreez3 do the world a favor and kill ur self
Afaral1989 1 year ago
@Afaral1989 lmao why so much hate mr. shitmouth?
starbreez3 1 year ago
why is this so EVIL SOUNDING
pilotoatomico 1 year ago
@pilotoatomico Because Bach is THAT amazing! :)
Oasys18 1 year ago
Nice Performance! My one comment is that it is in the wrong key - E minor rather than D minor. I don't know whether it is the instument or Mr. Koopman. I presume it the organ because Mr. Koopman introduced the piece as being in D minor. Thank you Ton and SoliDeoGloria8550!
organ444 1 year ago
where is the nice organ??
auns00 1 year ago
I like ton Koopman to much ...
santiagoblues 1 year ago
i dont like it this fast and this hectic atmosphere.
also at 1:02 he looks like playing with boobs
BansaiMont3l 1 year ago
1:02 hahahahahahaha
TonyWRO 1 year ago
Comment removed
TonyWRO 1 year ago
i think i know this song since i was like 5 (i'm 17 now) but it still gives me chills everytime i hear it. amazing work!
Giulia142593 1 year ago
Wow that's inteeeense
starbreez3 1 year ago
Comment removed
toni88vp 1 year ago
Comment removed
toni88vp 1 year ago
Comment removed
toni88vp 1 year ago
@toni88vp
Sorry... yo no cre oqeu bach estuviera todo el tiempo en nirvana con su musica... bach tambien tenia emocion y cometia errores, y si queria ornamentaba a la francesa o a su particular estilo.... quien de vosotros sos musicologos, calvecinistas y organistas??? ....
LeaBruggen 1 year ago
Comment removed
toni88vp 1 year ago
Comment removed
toni88vp 1 year ago
Comment removed
toni88vp 1 year ago
Comment removed
toni88vp 1 year ago
ufffffffffff impresionanteee
trombonpegalajar 1 year ago
How does one control the dynamics of an organ?
violinistx100 1 year ago
@violinistx100 the dynamics of a organ are control by the organ stops, when you use more organ stops the organ sounds more louder , sorry for my English !!!!
organo95 1 year ago
O my god, so fast.
Just sounds terrible
ArieVisker 1 year ago
Hey! Here we go with the wonderful possibilities of the internet anno christi 2010. You can refuse all accesible knowledge including Bach's own son's and say: Koopman ist wrong! You guys are wrong! Boy...that must feel good:-D
...solideo ....thanks for posting this recording.:-)
ksj818 1 year ago
It sounds like it's been transposed upward to Emin.
UltimaXG2 1 year ago
No, it is just being played on an historic instrument which is tuned to a higher pitch than the modern standard of A440 which is a 20th century invention.
md95065 1 year ago
@md95065
Took me a million years to figure out the new commenting system. Anyway, thanks for that.
UltimaXG2 1 year ago
Quys this is stylus phantasticus that means freedom expression,rethorical etc,not stict to the meter and not bound at the articulation of the meter.
It is is played much different that chorales or other strict baroque piece,Koopman sure know much more than us or anyone out there he has studies and understood the sources before all of us were born
tuxedomoon 1 year ago 26
Exactly. STYLUS PHANTASTICUS.
advisorC101 1 year ago
@advisorC101 LOL yes phantasticussss indeed
starbreez3 1 year ago
Indeed, this is exactly what i want to listen to...
LtTemeraire 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Go and compare it with Richters rendition. Zd_oIFy1mxM
Koopman has an overall sloppy, weak and spoilt keyboard expression. Richters rendition is a powerful german lutheran statement. In Koopmans rendition you hear in every detail the dutch flippancy.
YevgeniyAlexey 2 years ago
Richter plays in a Romantic, Neo-Classical style. Koop plays in the early Baroque style, of Buxtehude. The differences being that baroque music focuses more on intellectual craftsmanship, so to a romantic/modern ear it will appear distasteful. It's never a wise to compare Richter and Koopman in my opinion, as they are two entirely different worlds. I accept, respect and admire them both. But I understand what you mean though.
Also Koopman's techniques are very sophisticated and refined.
advisorC101 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
1:26
This is not refined. This is not sophisticated. This is sloppy.
I do not like his sleazy keyboard expression.
YevgeniyAlexey 2 years ago
Study CPE Bach, Essay on the art of true keyboard playing technique and you will see that you are wrong.
advisorC101 2 years ago
Sorry, I meant "Essay on the true art of playing keyboard instruments".
advisorC101 2 years ago
I do not believe in essays and manuscripts written even by CPE. I believe in the character, in the artistical message and expression of music. And BWV 669-689 tell me that you and Koopman are wrong. Maybe the stylus phantasticus can be applied to the early Bach but I am sure it is a great mistake to apply it to the late Bach of Leipzig. Koopman's Bach is not GERMAN and it is not LUTHERAN. You can not separate the lutheran way of life in Bachs time from his music.
YevgeniyAlexey 1 year ago
You cannot separate the Baroque from Baroque music.
advisorC101 1 year ago
Once more you try to label the Bachs area with incorrect concepts. The label "baroque" for a whole age is an invention of the late 19 th century. Bach himself did not live in the age of "Baroque", the scientists who believe in manuscripts and essays labeled him as a"baroque" composer 150 years after his death. Which is highly incorrect. I refuse to analyze, evaluate and perceive Bachs music in the restricted categories of the so called baroque area.
YevgeniyAlexey 1 year ago
You are a fool, a complete ignorant twat. Let's stop this conversation right here, we will never see eye to eye.
advisorC101 1 year ago
@YevgeniyAlexey Haha you just lost it in the moment you call upon the conversation stupid racist arguments.
starbreez3 8 months ago
Could you post the fugue please ?
leverkuhn67 2 years ago
Wat een held, godver de godver wat goed.
chapter24 2 years ago
marvellous
MondoTeckRemix 2 years ago
bellissimo!
MondoTeckRemix 2 years ago
Wonderful.
Koopman's CD of Bach music (on the Gabler organ at Weingarten) got me hooked on Baroque organ music almost 25 years ago.
He is still,by far,my favorite organist.
06R6er 2 years ago
does this organ have a short octave at the bottom?
mortson978 2 years ago
Interesting manual changes, I think I'll try this myself.
Although my style is different to Koop's, I must say this sounds ecstatic.
Best to learn as much as possible, from all sides.
advisorC101 2 years ago
The pedal board is domented.................but your really good
MickedyMusic 2 years ago
I have never heard this edition before, it's very interesting, although the trills seem a bit superfluous on the organ..
Excellent performance though
PforFabulous 2 years ago
Maybe he picked up wrong notes, because it doesn't sound good.
24161412416141 2 years ago
no, he don't picked up any wrong notes. koopman never makes mistaks. he uses the "ringk manuscript" that isn't comparable to modern editions
StefanoF87 2 years ago 21
Actually, the Ringk manuscript doesn't contain even half of these ornaments.
As I obtained my copy I was really disappointed to see it was virtually the same as better known editions.
Koopman, the genious he is, is just improvising a little. And I love it.
redeemer665 2 years ago 4
@StefanoF87 where can i find the sheetmusic of this ringk manuscript?
GJmusique 1 year ago
@StefanoF87 I'm sure he's made a mistake once or twice in practice though. He's only human! ...I think?
Terrdemarzielle 1 year ago
@Terrdemarzielle
and how sure you are bach didn't commit one!!!!
LeaBruggen 1 year ago
@LeaBruggen Bach definitely made mistakes. Only, his were on purpose.
Terrdemarzielle 1 year ago
Fairly good.
thepianomaniac 2 years ago
Impressive.
gigamax1978 3 years ago