however, i have to add that watching the roof top performance in 68 that it seems to be paul. paul had a very unique style of bass play, and as a bass player myself it seems to be legit. even with facial hair, he still looks like paul. there was a report that there was an independent study done with digital analysis of voice comparison at the univ. of miami, of old paul and new paul material that concluded these were not the same people. i can't find it again. lol
his eye's are brown in the white album photo which contradictory in time table to his death--unless they used an older photo; but his eye's are green in the hey jude video?? also, what about his son james? have you seen pictures of that guy on FB or elsewhere? dont you think his kid would have some early beatle looks? he looks nothing like young paul. i have tons of this stuff lol
i grew up with the Beatles... and watched all they did during the 60s closely.And i remember thinking with the Sgt.Pep album"he just doesnt look the same.. something's not right".An ever since i have almost every type of documentary on them.And I recently understand now WHY there are unusual moments where
any of the other 3 seem"unusual" and even uncomfortable with "Paul".This can REALLY be seen in ungaurded moments in the Let It Be movie.Look for yourself.. and look CLOSELY for those moments
@strangecluesinfriday this is the first time i've read something like this. I find this interesting because when i was a little boy going through my parents albums, i remember looking at the pictures of paul in the white album and then looking at pictures of young paul and feeling to myself that these aren't the same people. ahah! they look close, but not the same. what happened to the music too. have you seen this:
@yajairaslave i sure have.I was 15 when the Pepper album came out.And remember DISTINCTLY thinking to myself"he just doesnt look the same".An even as a 15 yr old, i DID notice the obvious things.His back turned to the camera especially.I instinctively"knew" something was not right.Being a Paul fan from the beginning,its a bit unsettling to know NOW whats been secret all this time.In Truth,it's taken the enjoyment out of listening to Beatles music or watching the movies.Others must be crushed
@strangecluesinfriday it's the white album picture that gets me in comparison.. there really is a lot of things clues. the one thing that always bothered me is the standard excuse for the whole mystery was/is that it was a "publicity stunt". lol! what the hell eould the beatles a publicity stunt for? if anything, they were trying to escape the mania. sgt pepper: yes, notice he's suddenly taller than everyone. in the wax figure next to them he's not taller than everyone-the young paul.
@strangecluesinfriday i have noticed that uncomfortable look too. didn't know if anyone had ever noticed that before. there was a supposed documented conversation between the yogi and harrison floating around online too that seems to have vanished. where he had stated that the beatles kept going but in large used a lot of paul's unpublished music to keep the band alive for a certain time. i guess, if true, he had a large body of work around yet unheard. interesting topic.. but yes, amiss..
@yajairaslave and THAT is true(about the music).Also,it explains WHY lennon and "Faul" semed to NOT get along from 1968 on.And why there was an unusual visible"tension" between Faul and the other 3 which is CLEARLY visible on the Let It Be movie.Also, OF COURSE they finally broke up in 69.They could NOT continue the fascade and keep pretending that this guy was actually Paul... could you ???
@strangecluesinfriday and what about the break up of him and jane asher right after. he'd been with her forever. all that facial hair all of the sudden. if you watch the hey jude video, his eye's are green.. lol! they look most certainly of a dark color evewn in black and white photos. and the music goes downhill too after 67. not one hit for paul on abby road??? hos solo stuff is totally lackluster compared to the brilliance of the mid sixties.. IDK? there is osme funny stuff..
@yajairaslave EXCELLENT.Youre one of the FEW who actuallt "get it".I'll point out,i WAS a VERY intense McCartney fan from the beginning to the present.It was NOT easy for me personally to come to terms with this reality, but ONLY a fool would disregard ALL the evidence that has come to light ever since the advent of the internet.Its ALL there.ALL the truth that was never known before the internet.And im sure"Faul" knows that soon he'll be exposed once and for all.He looks nervous these days.
@billy38010 Did you know that when "Faul" was arrrested for possion of pot in Japan that when the authorities took his fingerprintes, they were astonished and did NOT know what to make of it because they di NOT MATCH THE PRINTS OF "PAUL MCCARTNEY"?.. this is a documented FACT.. now aint THAT somethin?
@strangecluesinfriday Thank's for info--His signature in his German paternity suit matched that of a "Right" handed person--DNA didm't match either??? Curious, "Paul" had been paying child support for years, his German "Daughter" looked just like him---PID???
@billy38010 his time is running out.As i said, he NEVER envisioned a thing such as the internet.THIS will be the source of his being finally EXPOSED.The TRUTH is that when this happens.it will uncover a long hidden plot that has far more SINISTER implications and reasons behind it all than anyone ever imagined.As Heather Mills ( his ex) is quoted as saying,"when the trtuh is finally known NO one will be able to handle it".She's being painted as a bitter wacko.I for one, believe her.
@strangecluesinfriday--Yes, forensics show "Paul" is different---Problem is, the-Mainstream Media- won't touch this story---"Paul" has total backing from U.S. & Royal Governments.
@billy38010 Thats ok cause the bottom line is that IF powerful things such as "backing from U.S.and Royal Goverments" are THIS involved,its guilt by the mere reality of HAVING TO HIDE THE TRUTH.And this in itself is an admision isnt it?The reality being IF there was nothing to hide, there would be NO need to hide anything and pull out all the stops to CONFIRM that this was really MccCartney after all.BUT THEY REFUSE TO DO THIS.. DONT THEY ??Its over;and "Faul" knows it.
when you compare picture of Paul before and after are you also lokking at George John and Ringo because they certainly don't look the same as they were before.....
@MrGamersLand you're wrong.Recently some brilliant medical specialists in Italy did forensic comparison of the "before and after" and concluded the documented FACT that its NOT the same man
@EarthH2oLuma there are a FEW details that are in error BUT the indicating of the REASONS for the cover up and the other documented fatcs are VERY REAL and accurate.The voice of "george" is not him. But so what?There may have been a LEGAL reason to have someone do his voice.All in ALL ? its what got me RE-researching the whole thing and look for more RECENT documented evidence.And i found FAR more than i expected
@Rileewyliecoyote you're NOT considering that FORENSIC experts have compared bodily attibutes that DO NOT CHANGE.Theres FAR more evidence to expose this guy FINALY than most want to admit.Its overdue.The guy is NOT Paul.And the internet is the reason his time has come to be exposed.REALITY TIME.
@OttselSpy24 Different angles don't explain different tragus and earlobes, different foreheads, different mandibular angles, different noses, different head shapes, different heights, different laterality, different voices as analyzed by stress tests. You are the moron here.
And the great thing about that is, they always look the same! I'm pretty sure you could pick yourself out of a crowd of babies in a picture, even if you had never seen it before...
The occult stuff is interesting. But to compare Paul's face you need the same basic expression. And there are expert text-perts that can compare the features. Then we have his guitar playing and writing style. So, while Paul is still here, the occult side is real. What it means to Paul, George, John and Ringo, I don't know. But there is too much of the dark side in their little creations
Paul was knighted by the Queen, whom has now come clean and confessed her suport of the New World Order, which is said to be Satanic. But John Lennon was not knighted, he was silenced, murdered by an MKUltra Patsy they say. Now look at John Lennon's songs and it makes sense, "Power to the People" "Bring on the Lucie" "Working Class Hero" "Gimmi some Truth" etc...
Yea asshole but a 20 something year old man isn't going to change A fucking lot the only way he can change naturally is that he lost a TON of fucking weight, the human body (and this you should know if your going to school) changes up until the age of about 25 and that's stretching or facial features and if a Face is already the same it might only change in the few centimeters not the fucking stretch of face paul has...
But remember, he WAS in a car accident- but that was EARLY 1966- nowheres near November. That could explain a slight difference. He did have a chipped tooth during the Paperback Writer/Rain promos.
i think they all ate better after their success and ultimate journey to the states and got the chance to get some sun. they look healthier, more mature, and not to mention, more confident. paul's face appears to have widened a bit, but just the same, the nostrils are smaller in the 2nd paul. i think the thumbs will solve this conundrum. any comments?
wethebest, you made a good point. some clues that might need attention are: the 'first' paul's mouth appears to be fuller, and there are variations on the bridge and nostrils. another giveaway, which i haven't been able to investigate are the thumbs: the '1st' paul has a 'worker's' thumb, the kind that bends back at the last joint. he also appears to have larger hands than the '2nd' paul. all of the lads appeared to have physically matured between 65 to abt 68.
Compare early lennon photos to late lennon photos? do they look like the same man??? no!! does this mean john was replaced by a winner of some lennon look-alike contest?? no!! people's appearance change with age! so is paul dead?? no!!
Has anybody else been watching this from #1 all the way through? I have... I went into it with an open mind. But I had heard all of the backwards clues, and the most famous rumors, and thought it was probably just a coincidence... Now I have watched 31 of these videos and I am starting to get very creeped out by this... There IS something on here.
no you need your own eyes, and some common sense...those are 2 different people...the only conclusion...no matter how ridiculous it sounds...then if you do some research it will become more obvious...truth is stranger than fiction...
blabadiblabla is right. Paul smiles bright on the older photo and looks a litte bit seriously on the newer one. that change his look. when someones smiling bright his nose will get a litte bit bigger.
compare a pic of Lennon during Revolver to Lennon during Sgt Pepper,the difference is incredible! and the change has nothing t do with drugs,I think the whole Jesus statement/fearing for his life had a disastrous effect on his state of mind.
Its totally the same guy. Don't you guys know how people can look different when the angle is different and light and shadow can effect the look and appearence of anybody in a photo? Did IQs drop sharply while I wasn't looking or what?!?!?!?!?
He NEVER imagined a thing called "the internet" would come along.Its impossible not to continue to try to keep this under wraps.I used to think that ONLY when he pases on that the TRUTH will be made known. And know what ? Maybe NOT even then because IF the legalities of a will are such, possibly everything the "imposter" accumulated in "Paul's name" he just might forfeit and his inheritors might get NOTHING.Hard to say how legal things work cause THIS is the most UNIQUE situation EVER to exist
@strangecluesinfriday on youtube. it won't let me post the link.. but here: search for, heather's secrets and the media lies 2.. it's creepy. she got something, i'd love to know what it is that's so huge..
@yajairaslave what it is,is that Faul of course eventually told her the TRUTH.This freaked her out OF COURSE.Can you imagine living your entire life pretending to be someone else ?Think of this even;that someone ELSE all those years had been given credit for EVERYTHING you had done all your life??? NO WAY that this cant have a debilitating effect on a persons ego.Telling his wife(he felt he could trust her with the truth)was only natural to UNburden himself hopefully of the dark secret.Right ?
If I compare the pictures from my driving license with today's pictures - I have to tell you that these are two different people. But it's two times me. The process causing this is called development.
Or why do you think they want you to have a new passport with new pictures after 5 to 10 years (that's what it is like in Germany: 5 years 'til you're 25. After you reached that age it's 10 years).
Check the clip from HELP You're gonna lose that girl. The 5th Beatle is sitting at the piano. No it's not Paul cleverly edited into the scene. It's the "other" Paul who was with the group before the "real" Pauls's tragic "accident" Check it Out!
You obviously haven't done your homework. Just listen to some of the songs backwards. The clues are revealed in the songs. Plus, new "Paul", is taller and has a different personality.
It's funny how the "fake" paul lived in the middle of nowhere and happened to know how to play bass and piano just like paul mcartney. Or maybe they teached him in their underground HQ, with batman and robin.
well, ringo changed alot,too, in a few years, but i dont know if this is the real paul or not...
it really seems to be William (the lookalike), but if William took Paul's place in the beatles, how didn't they know it was not Paul? i mean, everyone's got a personal style, an accent, which aren't easy to copy.
sorry for my bad english, hope you understand what i wanted to say.
HE DOSNT LOOK ANY FUCKING DIFFERNET MAN!!!!! jeez there are alot of freaks in this world, omg, and this video probobly took u hours to do,,,wat a freak!!
This video is a good one - most of the time it's not easy to see any difference. This is one of the 2-3 examples where the difference is really obvious.
you can easily see the paul of today in the later pauls face. but for the photos believed to be of the original paul i have to say it doesn't look like the aged paul we see now..
any picture you compare over another will look different. I mean, you're talking different demensions, different angles, different cameras, different photographers, different years, different facial expressions, different lighting, different everything. If i compare myself now to a picture I took four years ago, and line it up, my head won't be the same size and I won't be standing in the same position, because they are TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT photos.
paul is not dead!in an interview (its on utube) john lennon said paul wasnt dead and i can not believe he would lie about that, he also said paul and yoko were the only two people he had ever picked to go into a "partnership" <-not sure of the exact word, with, and i dont see headstrong lennon accepting an imposter.
Paul's head is slighty tilted at the balcony photo and he has different hair cuts which can slighty alter the shape of your head depending on what the cut is.
Even if it was not the original paul, all of the best albums came after 66. Sgt. Pepper, Magical Mistery Tour, The white album, those are my favorites. Way to go Faul
Haha i know. Of course its all bollocks, but if it was true then it would be absolutely fantatic. Who would give a shit for paul. This new guy is great
Thank God someone else notices that there is actually something going on here. Also something to remember. In the early days, The Beatles with the exception of Ringo were close in height. Strange how on the Sgt Pepper album and on Paul is quite taller than John and George. Sorry but NO ONE grows that much during adulthood.
Paul the cutest beatle needing a nose job??? I don't think so. The nose job this phoney did get, but it was intentional to look more like Paul. The nose just makes him look more fake, just like his oval face. Paul had a round face.
Just a few questions...Are you George's son,Dani?...Is iamaphoney the fake Paul?..Why aren't any of the "messages" about Crowleyian magick?..They're all about Paul...Is there a #49?..
No, I am not george's son, even though George happens to be my favorite Beatle. Iamaphoney is not the fake paul because he reveals himself in rotten apple 39. He is a young thin guy with light-brown to blondish hair. Some of the messages ARE about Crowleyian magick. Paul on his latest album, calls himself 'the king of cosmania' which is really an anagram for 'son of the magickian.' Yes, all the clues from Sgt. Pepper to NOW point to "PAUL".
PAUL MCCARTNEY HAD DEFFANALLY DIEAD IN A CAR CRASH AND WAS REPLACED.how did his face change 66and 67 his voice and looks..wherever the reall paul is dead rip and ur not forgotten
On the later LIFE picture of them, you can clearly sense the solemness, or sadness of the group. It's like day and night from the comparison of the happiness in the first picure. Ringo on the second pic is looking as if he really wants to say something.
This is a clearly different man. Paul's eyebrows are smooth, and he has no cleft in his chin. This man's his face is longer, brows are rougher, have blue eyes, appears to have something in his left ear, and have a cleft chin. Paul's ears were larger; this man has smaller ears.
Stinkomanrocker- A funny/cool point for you to look for yourself. In the movie "Help" (1965)in one part they all dress in disguises at the airport. Funny how John, George and Ringo would look similar in a few years from then (1969) Paul is the only one who didn't fit the disguise!
Rock, that has nothing to do with anything. As for all these differences you mentioned, as I said to JamesPaul, people have plastic surgery all the time. And I'll bet Paul had it too, just to make his face a little thinner, etc. What is wrong with you people? You're so fanatically enamoured by the Beatles, that you'll believe ANYTHING. I should pity you all, but you just irritate me now for clinging to a large prank that got blown way out of proportion.
And you know what really kills me? If people would start believing in reverse speech, i.e. what scientists around the world are starting to view as what is truly a breakthrough in understanding the subconscious, AS pointed out in reversespeech(dog)org, a website that I am always referring skeptics to, only to see them turn a blind eye to it.....IF people would start to believe in it, then we wouldn't even be asking whether this is Paul or not. He simply isn't.
And where are these articles? I'd like to read where it was proven that the odds of intelligible speech ocurring at the rate that he finds them aren't mathematically slim. And that the crimes that were solved by using reverse speech, how about those? I'd like someone to prove his house WASN'T burned down by people threatening him to keep quiet about this. Really, I'd like to read those articles.
They're out there. I'd forgotten I'd heard him on the Art Bell show all those years ago. All I'm saying is you have to look at both sides of an argument, read up on 'em and then draw your own conclusions as best as you can. I did for both PID and reversespeech. Don't believe it.
The point is nothing has been proven as there has'nt been substantial research on this. Until then, it's a hypothesis and only that. You can speculate all you want on PID but using an unproven hypothesis as gospel is ineffective.
...and TKIN has degenerated into a creepfest of spirit channeling and Don Knotts fantasies. There is evidently a new version of it on the way though once they clean house. FYI
I know. I haven't been to TKIN in a while, actually. I go to the Nothing is Real forums now....the administrators there are (A)sane, and (B) English speaking. Sun King and Beatle Paul are wackos who believe everything they say is the gospel truth, and I got sick of their attitudes, so I no longer go there. All that creepy stuff of Don Knotts replacing Epstein was as much as a waste of my time as you consider Paul is Dead to be a waste of yours.
Hey for once we're in agreement! LOL I hope you get a chance to look into the points about 60's music I made in our previous discussion. Regardless of anyone's PID POV, it's a fascinating period for pop music. The Beatles may appear to lead the pack but they were just influenced by all the other bands around the same time..
Good to see some people who are sticking to the main idea. I too haven't done anything at TKIN (just peeking in every once in a while) since it got TOO weird. I'm also annoyed that the 60IF document has been utterly butchered to reflect a lot of the far-out theories.
The core of the issue is that the man in a lot of photos and appearances from 1967 onward is clearly not the man we saw earlier and voiceprint analysts have declared that there are at least three different Pauls on later albums.
People change their hair styles as they get older. But the side on which the parting of your hair is never changes. It can just jump from one side to the other. And yet, compare 1966 Paul to 1967 Paul...
There was never any evident parting on Macca´s head...and do you think that Lennon 1964 looks like lennon 1967 with long, nearly black hair and beard? I doubt he was replaced as well...:D
Um....actually, smartass, I DO think Lennon looks the same. Nobody ever talks about the differences in Lennon's face between those years, because there are none. He simply grew a mustache, then a beard, and grew his hair longer. Paul's face became noticably thinner (especially his nose), his "moptop" never really looked the same, and he appears to have somewhat of a larger forehead. And do your research, Paul DID part his hair occasionally.
It's funny that there's this whole so-called "urban legend" surrounding this guy, but nobody ever stops to think that maybe he's the one telling the stories about being Paul's replacement, even to this very day. Listen to "Friends to Go" on Chaos and Creation in the Backyard. What do you think he means, he'll be waiting on the other side? For who's friends to go? What doesn't he want them to know?
To screw with people's heads and make money? You know more and more people would buy to listen to clues and debate it but nobody could get a 100 percent true answer which is where they catch people becuase more and more people would look but not find it so people would keep buying and buying.
why does the real paul's father look exactly like the fake paul does now? and if the beatles wanted to keep this switch a secret, why did they bother meticulously creating songs that, when played backwards, revealed the "truth"???
I know exactly the guy you're talking about, HJ, but what I had thought was that could the new Paul, sans makeup and wig. Think about it: the camera zooms up to him like he bears some signifigance to the story, but he's never in the movie at any other stage. And "Paul" isn't seen as the camera pans among the crowd on the bus. Like an in-joke, maybe? It's not impossible for it to be the real Paul McCartney, but he looks a little more the long-headed Paul sans the wig, if you ask me.
Is it just me, or in the video for "Magical Mystery Tour", the round-headed supposedly "DEAD" Paul (as oppossed to the long-headed Paul) is seated in the back of the bus. They flash on him for a quick second as the camera pans among the crowds of people on the bus. He's seated in the very back, sitting alone with BLONDE hair that's clearly dyed. If anyone gets a chance to see the Beatles Magical Mystery Tour music video, look for that seen and let me know what you think.
Hey, they all look different in those two photos, not just Paul.
herbiemarx01 1 month ago
however, i have to add that watching the roof top performance in 68 that it seems to be paul. paul had a very unique style of bass play, and as a bass player myself it seems to be legit. even with facial hair, he still looks like paul. there was a report that there was an independent study done with digital analysis of voice comparison at the univ. of miami, of old paul and new paul material that concluded these were not the same people. i can't find it again. lol
yajairaslave 2 months ago
his eye's are brown in the white album photo which contradictory in time table to his death--unless they used an older photo; but his eye's are green in the hey jude video?? also, what about his son james? have you seen pictures of that guy on FB or elsewhere? dont you think his kid would have some early beatle looks? he looks nothing like young paul. i have tons of this stuff lol
yajairaslave 2 months ago
i grew up with the Beatles... and watched all they did during the 60s closely.And i remember thinking with the Sgt.Pep album"he just doesnt look the same.. something's not right".An ever since i have almost every type of documentary on them.And I recently understand now WHY there are unusual moments where
any of the other 3 seem"unusual" and even uncomfortable with "Paul".This can REALLY be seen in ungaurded moments in the Let It Be movie.Look for yourself.. and look CLOSELY for those moments
strangecluesinfriday 3 months ago
@strangecluesinfriday this is the first time i've read something like this. I find this interesting because when i was a little boy going through my parents albums, i remember looking at the pictures of paul in the white album and then looking at pictures of young paul and feeling to myself that these aren't the same people. ahah! they look close, but not the same. what happened to the music too. have you seen this:
yajairaslave 2 months ago
@yajairaslave i sure have.I was 15 when the Pepper album came out.And remember DISTINCTLY thinking to myself"he just doesnt look the same".An even as a 15 yr old, i DID notice the obvious things.His back turned to the camera especially.I instinctively"knew" something was not right.Being a Paul fan from the beginning,its a bit unsettling to know NOW whats been secret all this time.In Truth,it's taken the enjoyment out of listening to Beatles music or watching the movies.Others must be crushed
strangecluesinfriday 2 months ago
@strangecluesinfriday it's the white album picture that gets me in comparison.. there really is a lot of things clues. the one thing that always bothered me is the standard excuse for the whole mystery was/is that it was a "publicity stunt". lol! what the hell eould the beatles a publicity stunt for? if anything, they were trying to escape the mania. sgt pepper: yes, notice he's suddenly taller than everyone. in the wax figure next to them he's not taller than everyone-the young paul.
yajairaslave 2 months ago
@strangecluesinfriday i have noticed that uncomfortable look too. didn't know if anyone had ever noticed that before. there was a supposed documented conversation between the yogi and harrison floating around online too that seems to have vanished. where he had stated that the beatles kept going but in large used a lot of paul's unpublished music to keep the band alive for a certain time. i guess, if true, he had a large body of work around yet unheard. interesting topic.. but yes, amiss..
yajairaslave 2 months ago
@yajairaslave and THAT is true(about the music).Also,it explains WHY lennon and "Faul" semed to NOT get along from 1968 on.And why there was an unusual visible"tension" between Faul and the other 3 which is CLEARLY visible on the Let It Be movie.Also, OF COURSE they finally broke up in 69.They could NOT continue the fascade and keep pretending that this guy was actually Paul... could you ???
strangecluesinfriday 2 months ago
@strangecluesinfriday and what about the break up of him and jane asher right after. he'd been with her forever. all that facial hair all of the sudden. if you watch the hey jude video, his eye's are green.. lol! they look most certainly of a dark color evewn in black and white photos. and the music goes downhill too after 67. not one hit for paul on abby road??? hos solo stuff is totally lackluster compared to the brilliance of the mid sixties.. IDK? there is osme funny stuff..
yajairaslave 2 months ago
@yajairaslave EXCELLENT.Youre one of the FEW who actuallt "get it".I'll point out,i WAS a VERY intense McCartney fan from the beginning to the present.It was NOT easy for me personally to come to terms with this reality, but ONLY a fool would disregard ALL the evidence that has come to light ever since the advent of the internet.Its ALL there.ALL the truth that was never known before the internet.And im sure"Faul" knows that soon he'll be exposed once and for all.He looks nervous these days.
strangecluesinfriday 2 months ago
Paul or "Billy," Brown eyes or "Green." It's a simple question???
billy38010 5 months ago
@billy38010 Did you know that when "Faul" was arrrested for possion of pot in Japan that when the authorities took his fingerprintes, they were astonished and did NOT know what to make of it because they di NOT MATCH THE PRINTS OF "PAUL MCCARTNEY"?.. this is a documented FACT.. now aint THAT somethin?
strangecluesinfriday 2 months ago
@strangecluesinfriday Thank's for info--His signature in his German paternity suit matched that of a "Right" handed person--DNA didm't match either??? Curious, "Paul" had been paying child support for years, his German "Daughter" looked just like him---PID???
billy38010 2 months ago
@billy38010 his time is running out.As i said, he NEVER envisioned a thing such as the internet.THIS will be the source of his being finally EXPOSED.The TRUTH is that when this happens.it will uncover a long hidden plot that has far more SINISTER implications and reasons behind it all than anyone ever imagined.As Heather Mills ( his ex) is quoted as saying,"when the trtuh is finally known NO one will be able to handle it".She's being painted as a bitter wacko.I for one, believe her.
strangecluesinfriday 2 months ago
@strangecluesinfriday--Yes, forensics show "Paul" is different---Problem is, the-Mainstream Media- won't touch this story---"Paul" has total backing from U.S. & Royal Governments.
billy38010 2 months ago
@billy38010 Thats ok cause the bottom line is that IF powerful things such as "backing from U.S.and Royal Goverments" are THIS involved,its guilt by the mere reality of HAVING TO HIDE THE TRUTH.And this in itself is an admision isnt it?The reality being IF there was nothing to hide, there would be NO need to hide anything and pull out all the stops to CONFIRM that this was really MccCartney after all.BUT THEY REFUSE TO DO THIS.. DONT THEY ??Its over;and "Faul" knows it.
strangecluesinfriday 2 months ago
Yep, same man
ShaylahShmoo 8 months ago
@ShaylahShmoo Yup....
TheCatwoman61 8 months ago
when you compare picture of Paul before and after are you also lokking at George John and Ringo because they certainly don't look the same as they were before.....
MrGamersLand 8 months ago
@MrGamersLand you're wrong.Recently some brilliant medical specialists in Italy did forensic comparison of the "before and after" and concluded the documented FACT that its NOT the same man
strangecluesinfriday 2 months ago
I used to think it was all a hoax. I just watched on NetFlix,
"Paul McCartney Really is Dead"
"In 2005 2 audio cassette tapes labeled the Last Testament of
George Harrison mysteriously turned up at an office in Hollywood.
On them a voice claiming to be George (then deceased) related a
fantastic story."
See it and make up your own mind.
EarthH2oLuma 10 months ago
@EarthH2oLuma All Fake!! That "George" was obviously a fake! The estate should sue...
TheCatwoman61 8 months ago
@EarthH2oLuma there are a FEW details that are in error BUT the indicating of the REASONS for the cover up and the other documented fatcs are VERY REAL and accurate.The voice of "george" is not him. But so what?There may have been a LEGAL reason to have someone do his voice.All in ALL ? its what got me RE-researching the whole thing and look for more RECENT documented evidence.And i found FAR more than i expected
strangecluesinfriday 2 months ago
Why compare the pictures that were taken so many years apart?
bluesrock2008 10 months ago
What is the point of making the videos frightening? Seriously? I couldn't even watch number 28.
asiwavehello 1 year ago
Compare pictures of John from 1963 and 1969. They look very different. People can change.
geldofpunk32 1 year ago
Yeah if you look at the other beatles they look different too. People grow up. Did you look the exact same a couple of years ago? Didn't think so
Rileewyliecoyote 1 year ago
@Rileewyliecoyote you're NOT considering that FORENSIC experts have compared bodily attibutes that DO NOT CHANGE.Theres FAR more evidence to expose this guy FINALY than most want to admit.Its overdue.The guy is NOT Paul.And the internet is the reason his time has come to be exposed.REALITY TIME.
strangecluesinfriday 2 months ago
The reason he looks different on the 2 different albums is because hes at a completely different angle! Morons.
OttselSpy24 1 year ago
@OttselSpy24 Different angles don't explain different tragus and earlobes, different foreheads, different mandibular angles, different noses, different head shapes, different heights, different laterality, different voices as analyzed by stress tests. You are the moron here.
Lurking99 1 year ago
what happened to part 30?
SavagesInMyTown 1 year ago
Comment removed
MisterOldSchool1 1 year ago
Oh look, its me younger then older..... I must be dead.
iowdave 1 year ago 3
@iowdave There's one way to tell, are your ears blocked by hair, if so, then you must be dead.
mrocc12345 1 year ago
the nose is different!!!! in the older pic the nose was wider but then in the earlier pic it's narrower...thats just me though
giggitygiggitybam 1 year ago
And the great thing about that is, they always look the same! I'm pretty sure you could pick yourself out of a crowd of babies in a picture, even if you had never seen it before...
phalceprofit 1 year ago
the faces are different
paul is dead. died 1966 in a car crash
rip paul. PID truthers will never go away
neither will 9-11 truth
or the moon landing hoax
truth is rising
NatureBoy210 1 year ago
Exactly, he compares a photo of Paul in 62' to one from 70' its crazy.
darthtater7777 1 year ago
The occult stuff is interesting. But to compare Paul's face you need the same basic expression. And there are expert text-perts that can compare the features. Then we have his guitar playing and writing style. So, while Paul is still here, the occult side is real. What it means to Paul, George, John and Ringo, I don't know. But there is too much of the dark side in their little creations
IExposeMormonism 1 year ago
Mozart is... DEAD!!!!
calvero75 2 years ago
BLOOOOOOOOOD!! oh, i must be dead now. OMG, i'm barefoot!!! i guess i'm dead!!! Look at me, i'm not using my writing hand!! I MUST BE DEAD!!
PixieDust1996 2 years ago 4
Paul was knighted by the Queen, whom has now come clean and confessed her suport of the New World Order, which is said to be Satanic. But John Lennon was not knighted, he was silenced, murdered by an MKUltra Patsy they say. Now look at John Lennon's songs and it makes sense, "Power to the People" "Bring on the Lucie" "Working Class Hero" "Gimmi some Truth" etc...
PhuqueU 2 years ago
Hey, dude, look at any photos of me from when i was eight. I'm nearly 13 now. Do I look the same? OF COURSE NOT! people change, dude.
PixieDust1996 2 years ago 3
Yea asshole but a 20 something year old man isn't going to change A fucking lot the only way he can change naturally is that he lost a TON of fucking weight, the human body (and this you should know if your going to school) changes up until the age of about 25 and that's stretching or facial features and if a Face is already the same it might only change in the few centimeters not the fucking stretch of face paul has...
BarmielNagisa 2 years ago
But remember, he WAS in a car accident- but that was EARLY 1966- nowheres near November. That could explain a slight difference. He did have a chipped tooth during the Paperback Writer/Rain promos.
PixieDust1996 2 years ago
Frank Sinatra is dead!!! OM...G!!!
calvero75 2 years ago
uuuumm....at da end is dat niel or neil armstrong??? saying "one small step for man.....and one small step for mankind"
H0U5T0N3TX 2 years ago
@H0U5T0N3TX roger houston
YouDonteverhavetodie 1 year ago
i think they all ate better after their success and ultimate journey to the states and got the chance to get some sun. they look healthier, more mature, and not to mention, more confident. paul's face appears to have widened a bit, but just the same, the nostrils are smaller in the 2nd paul. i think the thumbs will solve this conundrum. any comments?
dictionar1 2 years ago
wethebest, you made a good point. some clues that might need attention are: the 'first' paul's mouth appears to be fuller, and there are variations on the bridge and nostrils. another giveaway, which i haven't been able to investigate are the thumbs: the '1st' paul has a 'worker's' thumb, the kind that bends back at the last joint. he also appears to have larger hands than the '2nd' paul. all of the lads appeared to have physically matured between 65 to abt 68.
dictionar1 2 years ago
holy crap he looks older! that means he died and was replaced!
wemily101 2 years ago 2
paul esta vivo!!
paul is alive!!
ramonmartinezca 2 years ago
Compare early lennon photos to late lennon photos? do they look like the same man??? no!! does this mean john was replaced by a winner of some lennon look-alike contest?? no!! people's appearance change with age! so is paul dead?? no!!
lspradling11 2 years ago 2
they all changed
WetheBest96 2 years ago
r8vjefo is bang right surely computer analysis of say 'She's leaving home' amd 'I'll follow the Sun' can nail this crazy business once and for all
Hexachloraphine 2 years ago
Has anybody else been watching this from #1 all the way through? I have... I went into it with an open mind. But I had heard all of the backwards clues, and the most famous rumors, and thought it was probably just a coincidence... Now I have watched 31 of these videos and I am starting to get very creeped out by this... There IS something on here.
richig761 2 years ago
I know. I'm starting to go crazy with it. I want to know.
Maybe if Paul dies and he wasn't the real Paul the truth will come out then.
xNikkaX3 2 years ago
no you need your own eyes, and some common sense...those are 2 different people...the only conclusion...no matter how ridiculous it sounds...then if you do some research it will become more obvious...truth is stranger than fiction...
Xandrino 2 years ago 2
I think we need some experts and computers on this one.
r8vjefo 2 years ago 2
I've always had the same thought, but I also thought they should strap 'im to a lie detector.
johnlennon616 2 years ago
Cuantos videos hay?
kartr123 2 years ago
Chorrocientos mil !
barthramone 2 years ago 2
Me aburri de ver estos videos, porque yo se que no es verdad... por que siguen insistiendo!!???
kartr123 2 years ago
blabadiblabla is right. Paul smiles bright on the older photo and looks a litte bit seriously on the newer one. that change his look. when someones smiling bright his nose will get a litte bit bigger.
brawleer71 2 years ago
compare a pic of Lennon during Revolver to Lennon during Sgt Pepper,the difference is incredible! and the change has nothing t do with drugs,I think the whole Jesus statement/fearing for his life had a disastrous effect on his state of mind.
colmanaucoin 3 years ago
They all look different espesially john and george paul stiil looks the same
Georgeharrison22 3 years ago
this is the greatest conspiracy ever. truly earthshattering
spallyman 3 years ago
They all look different... does that mean they are all frauds? NO!
skidoofus 3 years ago
scaryy
Falkon36 3 years ago
Its totally the same guy. Don't you guys know how people can look different when the angle is different and light and shadow can effect the look and appearence of anybody in a photo? Did IQs drop sharply while I wasn't looking or what?!?!?!?!?
blabadiblabla 3 years ago
before he dies he will tell someone truth or not
MatthewBreenOfficial 3 years ago 16
He NEVER imagined a thing called "the internet" would come along.Its impossible not to continue to try to keep this under wraps.I used to think that ONLY when he pases on that the TRUTH will be made known. And know what ? Maybe NOT even then because IF the legalities of a will are such, possibly everything the "imposter" accumulated in "Paul's name" he just might forfeit and his inheritors might get NOTHING.Hard to say how legal things work cause THIS is the most UNIQUE situation EVER to exist
strangecluesinfriday 3 months ago
@strangecluesinfriday on youtube. it won't let me post the link.. but here: search for, heather's secrets and the media lies 2.. it's creepy. she got something, i'd love to know what it is that's so huge..
yajairaslave 2 months ago
@yajairaslave what it is,is that Faul of course eventually told her the TRUTH.This freaked her out OF COURSE.Can you imagine living your entire life pretending to be someone else ?Think of this even;that someone ELSE all those years had been given credit for EVERYTHING you had done all your life??? NO WAY that this cant have a debilitating effect on a persons ego.Telling his wife(he felt he could trust her with the truth)was only natural to UNburden himself hopefully of the dark secret.Right ?
strangecluesinfriday 2 months ago
there noses are diffrent
ebutuoytsacdaorb 3 years ago
yeah, Paul's is fat and Faul's is thin and longer. The way they hold their mouths slightly open is also different.
babyg474 3 years ago
I understand that this is satire. The irony is that I believe Ringo really was replaced... just as Paul was.
rog944 3 years ago
Sorry, I meant to write the previous post this for the "Ringo is Dead" video.
rog944 3 years ago
paul is 64!!!!???????!?!?
alexTV 3 years ago
If I compare the pictures from my driving license with today's pictures - I have to tell you that these are two different people. But it's two times me. The process causing this is called development.
Or why do you think they want you to have a new passport with new pictures after 5 to 10 years (that's what it is like in Germany: 5 years 'til you're 25. After you reached that age it's 10 years).
bergloewe78 3 years ago
NASA BURRIED PAUL!
CryHepZero 3 years ago 3
A Tetrahedral Fingers
joshblue33 3 years ago
what if
i u w a s s?
grandfatheraleister 3 years ago
Check the clip from HELP You're gonna lose that girl. The 5th Beatle is sitting at the piano. No it's not Paul cleverly edited into the scene. It's the "other" Paul who was with the group before the "real" Pauls's tragic "accident" Check it Out!
doctorhackensteinmd 3 years ago
Hey, uh I was just wondering where the clip of the screaming comes from, it happens about 1:10?
I love these videos. Whether you accept it or reject it, they're edited really well, and they're so lovably creepy.
Thanks
GulperEEL 3 years ago
oh and...OMG John was replaced too!!! he has a beard and long hair OMFG he looks nothing like he did on the first picture!!!
Unchainedballad 3 years ago
this guyu it's just a phsico or schizophrenic or something.. it bloody crap.. OH SHIT I SAID BLOODY.. nam daed m'i haha
fxnegron 3 years ago
You obviously haven't done your homework. Just listen to some of the songs backwards. The clues are revealed in the songs. Plus, new "Paul", is taller and has a different personality.
rog944 3 years ago
Yes of course, you're the expert in the subject, words turned backwards really prove alot...don't be ridiculous.
Unchainedballad 3 years ago
I'm glad someone has finally acknowledged my expertise. This is a proud moment.
rog944 3 years ago
Your sarcasm detector is a bit off
Unchainedballad 3 years ago
It's funny how the "fake" paul lived in the middle of nowhere and happened to know how to play bass and piano just like paul mcartney. Or maybe they teached him in their underground HQ, with batman and robin.
Unchainedballad 3 years ago
All of this is so bloody stupid that I'll stop placing comments now. (Omg, I used the word "bloody". Does that mean I'm dead?)
rondellhundftw 3 years ago
john changed more than he did. i guess john was replaced too.
pacifist316 3 years ago
well, ringo changed alot,too, in a few years, but i dont know if this is the real paul or not...
it really seems to be William (the lookalike), but if William took Paul's place in the beatles, how didn't they know it was not Paul? i mean, everyone's got a personal style, an accent, which aren't easy to copy.
sorry for my bad english, hope you understand what i wanted to say.
asylumrocks 3 years ago
HE DOSNT LOOK ANY FUCKING DIFFERNET MAN!!!!! jeez there are alot of freaks in this world, omg, and this video probobly took u hours to do,,,wat a freak!!
staceyisacey 3 years ago
This video is a good one - most of the time it's not easy to see any difference. This is one of the 2-3 examples where the difference is really obvious.
to761983 3 years ago
and why do you have to use these stupid soundtracks in your videos man.. FUCK
ooNATIVEoo 4 years ago 2
you can easily see the paul of today in the later pauls face. but for the photos believed to be of the original paul i have to say it doesn't look like the aged paul we see now..
ooNATIVEoo 4 years ago
any picture you compare over another will look different. I mean, you're talking different demensions, different angles, different cameras, different photographers, different years, different facial expressions, different lighting, different everything. If i compare myself now to a picture I took four years ago, and line it up, my head won't be the same size and I won't be standing in the same position, because they are TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT photos.
shalzi17 4 years ago 9
@shalzi17
well maby you`re dead and you have been replaced by a look-a-like
k0stil 1 year ago
you cvant chanche so much in face in just 4 years
mrbals2 4 years ago
if someone took a pic of me a couple years back and compared it to me now, trust me, they would be saying "two different people"...
musicmancbj 4 years ago
a facelift will do that
Cotters2000 4 years ago
but they're all different, if you zoom in on each one you'll see
Someone should do something to counter this really...
un1q3u 4 years ago
they all look different, what's so different about paul?
Flagurated 4 years ago
in one of the life magazine photos paul was smiling, in the other one he was with a moustache and serious, so i don´t think he is other man
screamfilms 4 years ago
Cant everybody just shutup & stop talking saying hes dead? its pathetic.
If you were a true Beatles Fan you'd want peace, and to stop this STUPID & PATHETIC Rumor!
60sGal11 4 years ago
tang ina nyo totoo byan uma aus lol
toyang16 4 years ago
i see the same man
sdsusdsusdsu 4 years ago
holy shit the isnt paul!
shutdownthefed 4 years ago
paul is not dead!in an interview (its on utube) john lennon said paul wasnt dead and i can not believe he would lie about that, he also said paul and yoko were the only two people he had ever picked to go into a "partnership" <-not sure of the exact word, with, and i dont see headstrong lennon accepting an imposter.
santasxgirlfriend 4 years ago
you people are sad
wailaebeach 4 years ago
yes right 60sgal11
magnusbkdk 4 years ago
Paul is still the same Paul!!!
He just got older thats why he looks diffrent!
GOSH! Don't we all look diffrent from when we were 1 second old!!!!!!
We CHANGE!
PAUL DIDNT DIE!
60sGal11 4 years ago
Paul's head is slighty tilted at the balcony photo and he has different hair cuts which can slighty alter the shape of your head depending on what the cut is.
beatlefan246 4 years ago
A giant leap for mankind!
applemaca07 4 years ago
Even if it was not the original paul, all of the best albums came after 66. Sgt. Pepper, Magical Mistery Tour, The white album, those are my favorites. Way to go Faul
eznobile 4 years ago
If that was Faul actually singing in some of them.
Tdani81 4 years ago
Haha i know. Of course its all bollocks, but if it was true then it would be absolutely fantatic. Who would give a shit for paul. This new guy is great
sterlingsir 4 years ago
Nope. Definitely not the same man, and this series of YouTube videos is proving so.
shirteesdotnet 4 years ago
Right on!
Tdani81 4 years ago
Thank God someone else notices that there is actually something going on here. Also something to remember. In the early days, The Beatles with the exception of Ringo were close in height. Strange how on the Sgt Pepper album and on Paul is quite taller than John and George. Sorry but NO ONE grows that much during adulthood.
romeokid69 4 years ago
Where is #30? Its not in order here on your video page!
shirteesdotnet 4 years ago
You have to type in "paul is dead-the rotten apple 30" in the search window and click "search". The vids are not in order.
Tdani81 4 years ago
OMG,he got a nose job!..Many English people have deviated septums.Maybe when he got his fixed,he had his nose trimmed up a little.
Taranau 4 years ago
Paul the cutest beatle needing a nose job??? I don't think so. The nose job this phoney did get, but it was intentional to look more like Paul. The nose just makes him look more fake, just like his oval face. Paul had a round face.
Tdani81 4 years ago
Just a few questions...Are you George's son,Dani?...Is iamaphoney the fake Paul?..Why aren't any of the "messages" about Crowleyian magick?..They're all about Paul...Is there a #49?..
Taranau 4 years ago
No, I am not george's son, even though George happens to be my favorite Beatle. Iamaphoney is not the fake paul because he reveals himself in rotten apple 39. He is a young thin guy with light-brown to blondish hair. Some of the messages ARE about Crowleyian magick. Paul on his latest album, calls himself 'the king of cosmania' which is really an anagram for 'son of the magickian.' Yes, all the clues from Sgt. Pepper to NOW point to "PAUL".
Tdani81 4 years ago
I'll be suprised is his face is getting younger....I think human being grows older not younger right ? but good publicity though...
Blackmantra2000 4 years ago
PAUL MCCARTNEY HAD DEFFANALLY DIEAD IN A CAR CRASH AND WAS REPLACED.how did his face change 66and 67 his voice and looks..wherever the reall paul is dead rip and ur not forgotten
beatlelover93 4 years ago
On the later LIFE picture of them, you can clearly sense the solemness, or sadness of the group. It's like day and night from the comparison of the happiness in the first picure. Ringo on the second pic is looking as if he really wants to say something.
Tdani81 4 years ago
this series has officially spooked me...
for the first couple of videos of this series i watched i said "this is bull" now though... i think im actually... beleiving it?
beatlesrock13 4 years ago
This is a clearly different man. Paul's eyebrows are smooth, and he has no cleft in his chin. This man's his face is longer, brows are rougher, have blue eyes, appears to have something in his left ear, and have a cleft chin. Paul's ears were larger; this man has smaller ears.
Tdani81 4 years ago
Entre los 4 Beatles Paul es el mas parecido a si mismo . John esta IRRECONOCIBLE
claumusic3 4 years ago
Between the 4 Beatles Paul is but the similar one to itself. John this UNRECOGNIZABLE one
claumusic3 4 years ago
this is stupid :) I got bouth of those records. And All the other beatles have changes as well, specialy Lennon<3
Reitaner 4 years ago
how do we know ringo is the same person? in the later picture he has longer hair and facial hair! how do we know any of them are the same people?
stinkomanrocker 4 years ago
Stinkomanrocker- A funny/cool point for you to look for yourself. In the movie "Help" (1965)in one part they all dress in disguises at the airport. Funny how John, George and Ringo would look similar in a few years from then (1969) Paul is the only one who didn't fit the disguise!
tygrefyfe 4 years ago
ok, with the heartbeats and the eternaly smiling pictures of paul...you have officialy FREAKED ME OUT!!!!!
TheBeatlesAreBack1 4 years ago
All You Need is Love
Nothing you can say but you can learn to play the game."
jrouly 4 years ago
"There`s nothing you can do but you can learn how to be you in time, it`s easy!"
orbandsceptre27 3 years ago
his nose is smaller!
guitarlicksinc 4 years ago
Rock, that has nothing to do with anything. As for all these differences you mentioned, as I said to JamesPaul, people have plastic surgery all the time. And I'll bet Paul had it too, just to make his face a little thinner, etc. What is wrong with you people? You're so fanatically enamoured by the Beatles, that you'll believe ANYTHING. I should pity you all, but you just irritate me now for clinging to a large prank that got blown way out of proportion.
Kainlarsen 4 years ago
And you know what really kills me? If people would start believing in reverse speech, i.e. what scientists around the world are starting to view as what is truly a breakthrough in understanding the subconscious, AS pointed out in reversespeech(dog)org, a website that I am always referring skeptics to, only to see them turn a blind eye to it.....IF people would start to believe in it, then we wouldn't even be asking whether this is Paul or not. He simply isn't.
RockXLight 4 years ago
RockXLight, Have you read about the other side of the argument? The many articles that debunk Oates's claims? Frankly, they're much more persuasive.
ghostysshow 4 years ago
And where are these articles? I'd like to read where it was proven that the odds of intelligible speech ocurring at the rate that he finds them aren't mathematically slim. And that the crimes that were solved by using reverse speech, how about those? I'd like someone to prove his house WASN'T burned down by people threatening him to keep quiet about this. Really, I'd like to read those articles.
RockXLight 4 years ago
Just google him.
ghostysshow 4 years ago
They're out there. I'd forgotten I'd heard him on the Art Bell show all those years ago. All I'm saying is you have to look at both sides of an argument, read up on 'em and then draw your own conclusions as best as you can. I did for both PID and reversespeech. Don't believe it.
ghostysshow 4 years ago
The point is nothing has been proven as there has'nt been substantial research on this. Until then, it's a hypothesis and only that. You can speculate all you want on PID but using an unproven hypothesis as gospel is ineffective.
ghostysshow 4 years ago
...and TKIN has degenerated into a creepfest of spirit channeling and Don Knotts fantasies. There is evidently a new version of it on the way though once they clean house. FYI
ghostysshow 4 years ago
I know. I haven't been to TKIN in a while, actually. I go to the Nothing is Real forums now....the administrators there are (A)sane, and (B) English speaking. Sun King and Beatle Paul are wackos who believe everything they say is the gospel truth, and I got sick of their attitudes, so I no longer go there. All that creepy stuff of Don Knotts replacing Epstein was as much as a waste of my time as you consider Paul is Dead to be a waste of yours.
RockXLight 4 years ago
Hey for once we're in agreement! LOL I hope you get a chance to look into the points about 60's music I made in our previous discussion. Regardless of anyone's PID POV, it's a fascinating period for pop music. The Beatles may appear to lead the pack but they were just influenced by all the other bands around the same time..
ghostysshow 4 years ago
Good to see some people who are sticking to the main idea. I too haven't done anything at TKIN (just peeking in every once in a while) since it got TOO weird. I'm also annoyed that the 60IF document has been utterly butchered to reflect a lot of the far-out theories.
The core of the issue is that the man in a lot of photos and appearances from 1967 onward is clearly not the man we saw earlier and voiceprint analysts have declared that there are at least three different Pauls on later albums.
ZeroCorpse 3 years ago
<3 Paul for President.
One giant leap for mankind....
Man will space walk....
nice.
mattdot666 4 years ago
I heard it as "I never spacewalked..."
vincentcasse 4 years ago
Well there you go... :P
mattdot666 3 years ago
For what it's worth, I used to part my hair on the left too. Guess I'm dead.
ghostysshow 4 years ago
Could it be more obvious? Faul should be arrested for lack of talent, among other things.
JamesPaul66 4 years ago
if u make this video with john lennon, or ringo or wathever, they will look diferent too ¬¬
GORILLAZ2 4 years ago
Dude, people change as they get older. Get used to it.
hippiekyd416 4 years ago
yeah, people look different as they get older and change their hair...
animaniac4 4 years ago
People change their hair styles as they get older. But the side on which the parting of your hair is never changes. It can just jump from one side to the other. And yet, compare 1966 Paul to 1967 Paul...
RockXLight 4 years ago
There was never any evident parting on Macca´s head...and do you think that Lennon 1964 looks like lennon 1967 with long, nearly black hair and beard? I doubt he was replaced as well...:D
JohnnyMidgey 4 years ago
I´m sorry, there should have been 69 not 67...though his moustache also makes him different.
JohnnyMidgey 4 years ago
Um....actually, smartass, I DO think Lennon looks the same. Nobody ever talks about the differences in Lennon's face between those years, because there are none. He simply grew a mustache, then a beard, and grew his hair longer. Paul's face became noticably thinner (especially his nose), his "moptop" never really looked the same, and he appears to have somewhat of a larger forehead. And do your research, Paul DID part his hair occasionally.
RockXLight 4 years ago
Yes, but so did McCartney. He lost his weight and changed his haircut - couldn´t this, possibly, change him?
JohnnyMidgey 4 years ago
It's funny that there's this whole so-called "urban legend" surrounding this guy, but nobody ever stops to think that maybe he's the one telling the stories about being Paul's replacement, even to this very day. Listen to "Friends to Go" on Chaos and Creation in the Backyard. What do you think he means, he'll be waiting on the other side? For who's friends to go? What doesn't he want them to know?
RockXLight 4 years ago
To screw with people's heads and make money? You know more and more people would buy to listen to clues and debate it but nobody could get a 100 percent true answer which is where they catch people becuase more and more people would look but not find it so people would keep buying and buying.
username7768 4 years ago
why does the real paul's father look exactly like the fake paul does now? and if the beatles wanted to keep this switch a secret, why did they bother meticulously creating songs that, when played backwards, revealed the "truth"???
jcochran 4 years ago
yeah why?
iamaphoney 4 years ago
Do you think that Brian Epstein could be murdered by the beatles?? I mean, maybe he don't wanted a repleacement for Paul after his dead.
isagio 5 years ago
I know exactly the guy you're talking about, HJ, but what I had thought was that could the new Paul, sans makeup and wig. Think about it: the camera zooms up to him like he bears some signifigance to the story, but he's never in the movie at any other stage. And "Paul" isn't seen as the camera pans among the crowd on the bus. Like an in-joke, maybe? It's not impossible for it to be the real Paul McCartney, but he looks a little more the long-headed Paul sans the wig, if you ask me.
RockXLight 5 years ago
Is it just me, or in the video for "Magical Mystery Tour", the round-headed supposedly "DEAD" Paul (as oppossed to the long-headed Paul) is seated in the back of the bus. They flash on him for a quick second as the camera pans among the crowds of people on the bus. He's seated in the very back, sitting alone with BLONDE hair that's clearly dyed. If anyone gets a chance to see the Beatles Magical Mystery Tour music video, look for that seen and let me know what you think.
HammerJackson 5 years ago
2 different guys I wonder all the more what the real story is. The real Paul was a much happier guy, and I bet he would have got the pre nup.
JohnnyAqua 5 years ago
I get this feeling they dont want the truth out so people can debate over this in a sense its a way to keep the legacy going.
username7768 5 years ago