What proof is there? Truly. I know of no proof for moving earth, whether or not 10 gajillion scientists say it or not. The North Star never moves. Ever. How can that be? Earth is spinning, rotating, orbiting and expanding outward. 4 directions, 4 speeds according to scientists. Hmm. And there sits the North Star, same EXACT place, day after day, week after week, etc, etc. Explain that.
@flatterearth Denial, Denying logic. And Are you saying that the earth does not move? If So you must be a pre-schooler or F^king joking with me because this is hilarious i may just take a snapshot of this page to prove to creationists how stupid they sound.
Fake animation, old sketches and a deep throat do not prove the earth is slowing. The calendar can't prove slowing either because it doesn't prove that the earth is even moving. Show proof of movement first. Then show slowing from that proof. Earth movement is impossible, or explain how astronauts exit/return rotation of 1040 mph while earth is also going 67,000 mph (not to mention two other high speed movements necessary to the atheistic heliocentric theory) and you'll have me, bud.
@flatterearth 'atheistic' heliocentric theory? bud, we moved on from heliocentric universe long ago! For a heliocentric solar system, try Galileo's proof 4 centuries back! After that, start working through the knowledge base, there's a LOT of awe-inspiring beauty in the universe to catch up on :D
@archapmangcmg Yes, atheistic. Remember Galileo was against the church, dabbling in the occult, etc. His mentors, Keplar, Copernicus did similarly. Yes, there are a LOT of lies backed by stunning photos, but they remain lies nonetheless. Michaelson Morley experiment proved false earth's movement, but no one is told that. No proof for movement has ever been produced. ALL proof shows to the contrary. Mod/science wants to rewrite history to support Big Bang but that emperor has no clothes.
@flatterearth What proof can you accept ?! You're already denying centuries worth of work, and wrong about the religious beliefs of millions of scientists over that time.
Fifty years of photographic study by the U.S. Naval Observatory, the Harvard Smithsonian High Altitude Observatory, and the Royal Greenwich Observatory, has shown that the sun shrinks about 6 feet an hour. Going back in time, in a hundred thousand years the sun would have been twice as large. Two hundred and ten million years ago the earth and the sun would have been touching. Evolution on the earth would have been impossible.
@Th3Bl1ndSp0t 6 Feet an hour? Can you imagine how much mass that is? That woud be equal to burning the mass of 3 earths per hour! Funny that, the sun consumes 600 million tons of hydrogen per hour, this means it would take 70,000 yrs to consume 1 Earth. So no, the sun is not shrinking at 6 feet per hour, its too big to even comprehend.
@Th3Bl1ndSp0t Are you seroius? For the love of ... oh well... anyways, If the sun were to keep shrinking at your rate then the earth would eventually freeze now would your god do that to you? Boy you are screwed no matter how you answer that argument.
can't remember where i heard it, trying to find it on google is a bugger, there's something about the amount of concrete now on earth that has weighed the planet down so much that it has contributed to the slowing down of the planet, heard this at all?
just one extra point to the fact that earth is finite size, and can only support a set amount of people and animal life
yes i know......of course it is =P i was talking about a fraction being atributed to the added mass of man i.e there are 6 billion people, 6 billion x the average weight of 120 pounds = 326,586,506,400 kilograms, then the added weight of all other animal and plant life, and water which of course will fluctuate depending on climate and human usage/creation of etc.
yes it would have an effect along with the naturally occuring tidal forces, was just asking if you knew where to read more about it
@afrikanbadboy retrograde motion is an illusion caused by the Earth passing Mars because of its faster orbit. As it passes the angle between the two changes in a way that makes mars appear to move backward , thats not possible though.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
whats wrong with your voice. Has satan already affected your personality? Bible is truth. Dawkins is lie. Its indeed a great delusion this Dawkins. GOd already let us know when this great delusion would come.
Your a fool. God has told you that. Only a fool says in his heart that there is nog God
OK I have seen this clip way too many times... I am going to raise up to the bait. The distance from SF to NYC is 2,905 miles Therefore: 2,905 divided by 1,000,000 is: .002905 miles. There are: 5,280 feet in a mile. Therefore: .002905 times 5,280 is:15.334 feet
I am sorry. I understand why you are "disguising" your voice. However, since English is not my native language (and I think here are many in that position) it's very hard to understand.
Rolling the numbers backwards, I get something like 50,000 miles for the moons orbit and about 19 hours for Earths rotation at 4.5 billion years in the past. Gee. Sure seems like they can't even do maths right, and I got it close to values I've read with my feeble efforts :P
Prove the earth moves. There is no proof. None zip zero nada.
flatterearth 1 year ago
@flatterearth
prove you have a brain. There is no proof. None zip zero nada
AndrewManche 1 month ago
Err..
The Earths rotation is caused by magnetic field. It is an electric motor.
kaderoder 1 year ago
What proof is there? Truly. I know of no proof for moving earth, whether or not 10 gajillion scientists say it or not. The North Star never moves. Ever. How can that be? Earth is spinning, rotating, orbiting and expanding outward. 4 directions, 4 speeds according to scientists. Hmm. And there sits the North Star, same EXACT place, day after day, week after week, etc, etc. Explain that.
flatterearth 1 year ago
@flatterearth Denial, Denying logic. And Are you saying that the earth does not move? If So you must be a pre-schooler or F^king joking with me because this is hilarious i may just take a snapshot of this page to prove to creationists how stupid they sound.
JoelB3783 1 year ago
Fake animation, old sketches and a deep throat do not prove the earth is slowing. The calendar can't prove slowing either because it doesn't prove that the earth is even moving. Show proof of movement first. Then show slowing from that proof. Earth movement is impossible, or explain how astronauts exit/return rotation of 1040 mph while earth is also going 67,000 mph (not to mention two other high speed movements necessary to the atheistic heliocentric theory) and you'll have me, bud.
flatterearth 1 year ago
@flatterearth 'atheistic' heliocentric theory? bud, we moved on from heliocentric universe long ago! For a heliocentric solar system, try Galileo's proof 4 centuries back! After that, start working through the knowledge base, there's a LOT of awe-inspiring beauty in the universe to catch up on :D
archapmangcmg 1 year ago
@archapmangcmg Yes, atheistic. Remember Galileo was against the church, dabbling in the occult, etc. His mentors, Keplar, Copernicus did similarly. Yes, there are a LOT of lies backed by stunning photos, but they remain lies nonetheless. Michaelson Morley experiment proved false earth's movement, but no one is told that. No proof for movement has ever been produced. ALL proof shows to the contrary. Mod/science wants to rewrite history to support Big Bang but that emperor has no clothes.
flatterearth 1 year ago
@flatterearth What proof can you accept ?! You're already denying centuries worth of work, and wrong about the religious beliefs of millions of scientists over that time.
archapmangcmg 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Can you explain this to me?
Fifty years of photographic study by the U.S. Naval Observatory, the Harvard Smithsonian High Altitude Observatory, and the Royal Greenwich Observatory, has shown that the sun shrinks about 6 feet an hour. Going back in time, in a hundred thousand years the sun would have been twice as large. Two hundred and ten million years ago the earth and the sun would have been touching. Evolution on the earth would have been impossible.
What do you think?
Th3Bl1ndSp0t 1 year ago
Copy and pasted the same refuted argument on two videos? Marked as spam.
DeltaAtheism 1 year ago
@Th3Bl1ndSp0t 6 Feet an hour? Can you imagine how much mass that is? That woud be equal to burning the mass of 3 earths per hour! Funny that, the sun consumes 600 million tons of hydrogen per hour, this means it would take 70,000 yrs to consume 1 Earth. So no, the sun is not shrinking at 6 feet per hour, its too big to even comprehend.
gethneagle 1 year ago
@Th3Bl1ndSp0t Are you seroius? For the love of ... oh well... anyways, If the sun were to keep shrinking at your rate then the earth would eventually freeze now would your god do that to you? Boy you are screwed no matter how you answer that argument.
JoelB3783 1 year ago
I don't want your earth rotation-y, astrophysics-y hocus pocus!
Jsidhu762 1 year ago
What?
DeltaAtheism 1 year ago
can't remember where i heard it, trying to find it on google is a bugger, there's something about the amount of concrete now on earth that has weighed the planet down so much that it has contributed to the slowing down of the planet, heard this at all?
just one extra point to the fact that earth is finite size, and can only support a set amount of people and animal life
mutley2209 2 years ago
The planet has not increased significantly in mass since the archaean eons during which it accreted.
DeltaAtheism 2 years ago
can't remember where i heard it, may actually have been the mass of life that slowed the spin by a fraction compiled with buildings etc
just one of those things that i can't remember and drives me nuts lol
mutley2209 2 years ago
That is not possible; life and manufactured structures are built from material which was part of the planet; the system, matter-wise, is closed.
The spin is slowing, yes, but that is due to tidal forces with Luna.
DeltaAtheism 2 years ago
yes i know......of course it is =P i was talking about a fraction being atributed to the added mass of man i.e there are 6 billion people, 6 billion x the average weight of 120 pounds = 326,586,506,400 kilograms, then the added weight of all other animal and plant life, and water which of course will fluctuate depending on climate and human usage/creation of etc.
yes it would have an effect along with the naturally occuring tidal forces, was just asking if you knew where to read more about it
mutley2209 2 years ago
But it's not added; humans and other biomass are made from the same atoms that were once part of the planet - they still are.
DeltaAtheism 2 years ago
@DeltaAtheism - What about the amount of debris coming in from space adding to the earths mass?
Mrcharliebobo 2 years ago
That does indeed happen, but compared the the mass of the planet, it is for all intents and purposes zero.
DeltaAtheism 2 years ago
retrograde motion chech it out mars spinned back wards if you know send me a message k peace and salutations
afrikanbadboy 1 year ago
Not backwards; Mars has toppled, and as such its apparent rotation has reversed.
Venus spins in reverse, though again, it is possible the planet is simply "upside down" and only appearing to spin in reverse.
DeltaAtheism 1 year ago
@afrikanbadboy retrograde motion is an illusion caused by the Earth passing Mars because of its faster orbit. As it passes the angle between the two changes in a way that makes mars appear to move backward , thats not possible though.
SqueakerAlpha 1 year ago
Comment removed
AlYassou3Rabbi 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Concrete does not increase in weight as it cures. Who told you that?
I have a bridge I would like to sell you.
AlYassou3Rabbi 1 year ago
Hey, which video does Kent Hovind talk about the rotation of the Earth slowing?
Stitchman3875 2 years ago
I'm afraid I do not know. I got the argument from a debate between me (logged in as "1RadicalOne") and "militarykilroy", on this video:
/watch?v=elSreLH8gDs
DeltaAtheism 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
show your face atheist!
megaloethor 2 years ago
"show your face atheist!"
Why do you care? So you can create an ad hominem?
DeltaAtheism 2 years ago
I have to admit. I would sub, but the disguised voice is way too distracting. Otherwise, good work!
DogOfTheSpag 2 years ago
It's just processing, and the newer videos are better. I had a problem with noise initially.
DeltaAtheism 2 years ago
Screeching monkey is jumping up and down in his cage trying to find a face to fling his poo at.
sabertooth1980 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
whats wrong with your voice. Has satan already affected your personality? Bible is truth. Dawkins is lie. Its indeed a great delusion this Dawkins. GOd already let us know when this great delusion would come.
Your a fool. God has told you that. Only a fool says in his heart that there is nog God
megaloethor 2 years ago
"whats [sic] wrong with your voice. [sic]"
If you were to spend a joule of effort, you would realize that I process it.
"Has satan [sic] already affected your personality?"
Satan does not exist.
DeltaAtheism 2 years ago
"Bible is truth. Dawkins is lie. God already let us know when this great delusion would come."
Prove it.
DeltaAtheism 2 years ago
"Only a fool says in his heart that there is no God"
Your Bible is a load of crap.
DeltaAtheism 2 years ago
OK I have seen this clip way too many times... I am going to raise up to the bait. The distance from SF to NYC is 2,905 miles Therefore: 2,905 divided by 1,000,000 is: .002905 miles. There are: 5,280 feet in a mile. Therefore: .002905 times 5,280 is:15.334 feet
KasparHauser4 2 years ago
Oh I forgot to note that the 1,000,000 is the "Dawkins factor" discussed in the video.
KasparHauser4 2 years ago
Are you actually an idiot, or are you trying to confuse people?
It should be "Therefore: .002905 times 5,280 TIMES 1,000,000 is:15,000,000.334 feet "
Maverician 2 years ago
Maverician
LOL
KasparHauser4 2 years ago
I am sorry. I understand why you are "disguising" your voice. However, since English is not my native language (and I think here are many in that position) it's very hard to understand.
musmusik 2 years ago
The major motor slowing the earths rotation is loss of rotational energy as the moon moves further away, is it not?
RyuDarragh 2 years ago
Correct.
DeltaAtheism 2 years ago
Rolling the numbers backwards, I get something like 50,000 miles for the moons orbit and about 19 hours for Earths rotation at 4.5 billion years in the past. Gee. Sure seems like they can't even do maths right, and I got it close to values I've read with my feeble efforts :P
RyuDarragh 2 years ago
are you speaking into a tin can man LOL good vid
GodKillerAtheist 2 years ago
The processing does damage. The "tincan" artifact is a product of the noise removal.
1RadicalOne 2 years ago