Added: 3 years ago
From: gschut
Views: 9,604
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (18)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Get a life mad71994 you are the loser here not met dummy!

  • your so stupid that you cant even get a good whole takeoff footage and landing footage jack ass.

  • Mach 2.00 hmm aorund 2.500km/h

  • I would have taken one of the safety cards with me as a souvenire.

  • Whats that a picture of?! 3:10

  • Would have been a better idea to pick the camera up occasionally! 0:45

  • keep the camera still!!!!!

  • Other than speed, it Concord was never really "Luxury." It was too overrated on that part...

  • Comment removed

  • SPREAD THE WORD LETS TRY GETTING A LEAST ONE OF THESE LADIES FLYING AGAIN

    save-concorde .co .uk

  • Im going to new york soon and it ill take 8 hours to get there and its sad to think i could of got there in 3, technology should never regress =\

  • GREAT video!!!!!!!!! thanks for posting it :)

  • very true this is why the concorde is no longer in service

  • 3 hours would be time saving, but somewhat wasteful of resources, or am I wrong. I hate how long international flights can be.

  • there wa no need for an inflight movie it was only 3.5hours, where as the 747-400 on the LHR-JFK route is almost 7.5hrs so need for IFE.

  • Its cool it shows that data, the data is the spectacle of the flight, so great idea! It's cool thinking the whole flight you go that fast. People on board look like they're thinking about that.

  • first time i realize there wasnt movie

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more