Get a life mad71994 you are the loser here not met dummy!
gschut 3 months ago
your so stupid that you cant even get a good whole takeoff footage and landing footage jack ass.
mad71994 3 months ago
Mach 2.00 hmm aorund 2.500km/h
Ninjasaky 3 months ago
I would have taken one of the safety cards with me as a souvenire.
InDeepSchit 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SPREAD THE WORD LETS TRY GETTING A LEAST ONE OF THESE LADIES FLYING AGAIN
save-concorde .co .uk
nathanfishing3000 5 months ago
Whats that a picture of?! 3:10
4crevis 7 months ago
Would have been a better idea to pick the camera up occasionally! 0:45
keep the camera still!!!!!
headhitter94 9 months ago
Other than speed, it Concord was never really "Luxury." It was too overrated on that part...
TheEsotericDesi 11 months ago
Comment removed
astonmartinvee8 1 year ago
SPREAD THE WORD LETS TRY GETTING A LEAST ONE OF THESE LADIES FLYING AGAIN
billytk247 1 year ago 8
Im going to new york soon and it ill take 8 hours to get there and its sad to think i could of got there in 3, technology should never regress =\
danmiddleton7893 1 year ago
GREAT video!!!!!!!!! thanks for posting it :)
Whild91 1 year ago
very true this is why the concorde is no longer in service
walkerob92 1 year ago
3 hours would be time saving, but somewhat wasteful of resources, or am I wrong. I hate how long international flights can be.
secretname1000able 1 year ago
there wa no need for an inflight movie it was only 3.5hours, where as the 747-400 on the LHR-JFK route is almost 7.5hrs so need for IFE.
walkerob92 1 year ago 3
Its cool it shows that data, the data is the spectacle of the flight, so great idea! It's cool thinking the whole flight you go that fast. People on board look like they're thinking about that.
first time i realize there wasnt movie
jerarbel 1 year ago
Get a life mad71994 you are the loser here not met dummy!
gschut 3 months ago
your so stupid that you cant even get a good whole takeoff footage and landing footage jack ass.
mad71994 3 months ago
Mach 2.00 hmm aorund 2.500km/h
Ninjasaky 3 months ago
I would have taken one of the safety cards with me as a souvenire.
InDeepSchit 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SPREAD THE WORD LETS TRY GETTING A LEAST ONE OF THESE LADIES FLYING AGAIN
save-concorde .co .uk
nathanfishing3000 5 months ago
Whats that a picture of?! 3:10
4crevis 7 months ago
Would have been a better idea to pick the camera up occasionally! 0:45
4crevis 7 months ago
keep the camera still!!!!!
headhitter94 9 months ago
Other than speed, it Concord was never really "Luxury." It was too overrated on that part...
TheEsotericDesi 11 months ago
Comment removed
astonmartinvee8 1 year ago
SPREAD THE WORD LETS TRY GETTING A LEAST ONE OF THESE LADIES FLYING AGAIN
save-concorde .co .uk
billytk247 1 year ago 8
Im going to new york soon and it ill take 8 hours to get there and its sad to think i could of got there in 3, technology should never regress =\
danmiddleton7893 1 year ago
GREAT video!!!!!!!!! thanks for posting it :)
Whild91 1 year ago
very true this is why the concorde is no longer in service
walkerob92 1 year ago
3 hours would be time saving, but somewhat wasteful of resources, or am I wrong. I hate how long international flights can be.
secretname1000able 1 year ago
there wa no need for an inflight movie it was only 3.5hours, where as the 747-400 on the LHR-JFK route is almost 7.5hrs so need for IFE.
walkerob92 1 year ago 3
Its cool it shows that data, the data is the spectacle of the flight, so great idea! It's cool thinking the whole flight you go that fast. People on board look like they're thinking about that.
secretname1000able 1 year ago
first time i realize there wasnt movie
jerarbel 1 year ago