The reason we have these abstract concepts and ideas in terminology is because without them it would be extremely difficult and inconvenient to talk about them with other musicians. I don't care if you use the wrong term, but if you throw around big words to look smart (like I thought you were doing) then you look ignorant to the ppl that do know better. That's why I lol'd. lol
There aren't many videos of true polyrhythms on Youtube (most polymetrics are mistakenly called polyrhythms), but Mike Mangini has a few videos showcasing some actual polyrhythms, and Virgil Donati and a few others. If you're really interested send me a pm and I'll give you a few links.
No, it depends on what type of polyrhythm you play. A 3 over 2 polyrhythm takes 2 beats to resolve for instance. It doesn't have to sound abstract, and depending on the listener, it can sound very musical. Or you can play something extremely disjointed like 17 over 19, but in those cases it probably won't be musical to most people.
Thank you for finally looking it up. I guess you did care about not being ignorant. In that case, I'll help you clear up a few things. First of all, what Virgil does in my layering video is called "polymetric" because he's playing the same time value (16th notes) but playing simultaneous rhythmic phrases of different lengths. They do cycle and resolve like polyrhythms, but the difference is that polyrhythms do NOT take the same note value.
I don't really care that you're ignorant, and evidently neither do you, so it ultimately doesn't matter who's right here.
However if you do get the urge to know the truth I'd suggest the wikipedia articles on clave, polyrythms, and odd time signatures. You don't know what those are, and if you would only check, you would see that for yourself.
Großes Kino, weiter so =)
Zildjianrocks 4 months ago
Sah ihn in Hüls 2010............................unglaubliches Solo auch dort.
Dieser Mann ist ganz weit vorne!!!!
Auf`m Boden bleiben und weiter stilvoll "zu-inken" lassen Tim!
slicegolfjunk 1 year ago
hi tim!!!
viel liebe grüße aus hagen emst von mir und meinen eltern.
timo
Timbo1231000 2 years ago
gute sache herr husung ;)
inspector gadget hat spaß gemacht zu zocken mit euch jungens ;)
grüße
Marius
90SemperFi 2 years ago
spitzeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
sunnymoon67 2 years ago
Comment removed
historyfucker1 2 years ago
Er ist für mich einer der besten schlagzeuger europas wenn nicht sogar der Welt
ubique123 3 years ago
The reason we have these abstract concepts and ideas in terminology is because without them it would be extremely difficult and inconvenient to talk about them with other musicians. I don't care if you use the wrong term, but if you throw around big words to look smart (like I thought you were doing) then you look ignorant to the ppl that do know better. That's why I lol'd. lol
cjcdrums 4 years ago
There aren't many videos of true polyrhythms on Youtube (most polymetrics are mistakenly called polyrhythms), but Mike Mangini has a few videos showcasing some actual polyrhythms, and Virgil Donati and a few others. If you're really interested send me a pm and I'll give you a few links.
cjcdrums 4 years ago
No, it depends on what type of polyrhythm you play. A 3 over 2 polyrhythm takes 2 beats to resolve for instance. It doesn't have to sound abstract, and depending on the listener, it can sound very musical. Or you can play something extremely disjointed like 17 over 19, but in those cases it probably won't be musical to most people.
cjcdrums 4 years ago
Thank you for finally looking it up. I guess you did care about not being ignorant. In that case, I'll help you clear up a few things. First of all, what Virgil does in my layering video is called "polymetric" because he's playing the same time value (16th notes) but playing simultaneous rhythmic phrases of different lengths. They do cycle and resolve like polyrhythms, but the difference is that polyrhythms do NOT take the same note value.
cjcdrums 4 years ago
Now seriously, go check. If you don't like wikipedia, fine, just search google.
You really DON'T know what you're talking about. See for yourself.
cjcdrums 4 years ago
I don't really care that you're ignorant, and evidently neither do you, so it ultimately doesn't matter who's right here.
However if you do get the urge to know the truth I'd suggest the wikipedia articles on clave, polyrythms, and odd time signatures. You don't know what those are, and if you would only check, you would see that for yourself.
cjcdrums 4 years ago
Like I said, theres not a single odd time or polyrhythm in the whole solo.
If you don't know what a word means you should find out before you start using it.
cjcdrums 4 years ago
at 2:15 he then goes into a samba ostinato with his feet and solos with his hands
cjcdrums 4 years ago
d'oh! I meant at 1:15 to 2:15 he's playing a samba, not starting at 2:15
cjcdrums 4 years ago
at 0:54 he's playing 2:3 clave pattern on the left foot cowbell
cjcdrums 4 years ago
You asked about the "odd time signature poly-rythem" but there's not a single odd time or polyrhythm in the whole solo!
I think you don't know what you're talking about but you're still trying to sound smart to the noobs and THAT's what I find funny =)
cjcdrums 4 years ago
YOU
cjcdrums 4 years ago
lol
cjcdrums 4 years ago
That was nice.
cfyves 5 years ago