the only reason Hitler failed is because the USA suplied the russians with money and arms and because he did not end the UK. The winter and the actual mass of russia was just a plus.
The biggest mistake committed by Hitler in the war. He was too anxious to win his "war on Bolshevism" and exterminate the Slavic race (my race) and colonize their land that he forgot about Britain still being at war with him as well as the fact that he soon declared war on the United States.
@XxI3ioHazardxX He didn't declared war on United States. USA became hostile of Germany because US was attacked by Japan Empire in Pearl Harbor. Fascist Italy, Nazi Germany and Japan Empire was all allies. So USA by attacking Japan became enemy of Germany and Italy. Also he thought that he wold beat USSR easily because USSR failed to annex Finland and to him USSR was pathetic country. But the cold winter of Russia destroyed his hopes to beat slavs and communism.
@BaltijosTigras Ummmmm you are so wrong! Hitler the day after Japan attacked Pearl Harbor declared war on the US! LOL you really need to read history more. No Offense bro but if you are going to type shit try looking at a history book before you spout shit, look it up I dare you, HITLER DID DECLARE WAR ON THE USA! That is why we fought the European war first and the pacific second. Had Hitler not declared war on us, we would have only concentrated on the Japanese and WW2 may have been different.
@BaltijosTigras Here bro just so you cant say I did not back myself up with proof. news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/december/11/newsid_3532000/3532401.stm. Here is the link to the news article about Hitler's dumbass mistake that you say he did not make. Now go read a damn history book, NO MORE POSTING for you until you learn something!
@StreetFighterFan86 STFU i know history better than you do and i know who was in a war with who. Even he declared war on USA he pretty much fought alone with everyone and it surprising he lasted as long as he did. Germany was really strong but Hitler just like Stalin was an idiot.
@BaltijosTigras Well moron if you knew history more than me which I doubt then why did you claim that he DID NOT declare war on us and then now turn around and change your story when I just proved your sorry no nothing ass wrong, huh? Yeah you know nothing, now as for Hitler being strong, I do agree, he was in command of one of the most powerful armies. His mistake was declaring war on America which was the strongest industrial might at the time, if he had left us alone he would have won. And ..
@BaltijosTigras no again you show how little of history you know. He had many allies, Japan, Russia (for a time), Romania (which had a strong army), Italy (which had one of the worlds largest fleets at that time), Bulgaria, Norway, Hungary, Finland (yes Finland was an ally as Wikipedia states), Albania, Montenegro, Serbia, Slovakia, and was in negotiations with Ireland and Mexico to open fronts against America's south and Britain's west. So no Hitler had allies, he simply kept making...
@BaltijosTigras Military blunder after blunder which combined with America's industrial might to keep pumping out tanks, ships, and ammunition finally crippled the Axis war machine. Was Hitler a fool at times, yes he was, but by no means was he alone, far from it he even had allies in the catholic church and in America. Trust me he was not alone! Once again you simply show that your knowledge of history is low. Just please stop talking now, don't make me break out my WW2 history book again!
@StreetFighterFan86 tell me how some catholic churches can help him win the war. Now you telling me that because i didn't knew that he had supporters in churches my history knowledge is low? FU! Anyway WW2 helped USA to get a lot of money and finally end the great depression :D. Anyway im young so i can still learn pretty a lot and i will do that. Anyway USA now collapsing so i can wish only luck for Iran.
@BaltijosTigras Wow now you really are showing how stupid you are lol. America is not collapsing you moron child! America like the rest of the world was in a economic depression and now if you bother to read news reports America's economy is coming back to life and so are some of the other nations of the world, how stupid are you anyway? America went through a depression many times in her history, the 1920's, 1950's and the 1980's. Each time America bounced back like all nations do. Lol moron!
@StreetFighterFan86 Whatever i guess you are fat ass dumbass who sits in Mcdonalds all day and thinks that he is clever :D Just like i thought - another stupid fat american XD
@XxI3ioHazardxX You are right, Hitler was a fool to join Japan in declaring war on the USA. America had the best industrial might of all nations combined in those days. Why he thought he could beat America, Britain, Russia, and Canada I do not know, perhaps no one ever will.
@StreetFighterFan86 Hitler, actually could beat all of those countries...with the right choices and strategy, but Hitler, like Stalin, we're fools, tought their armies we're invincible.
@dar260 No once America entered the war it was over, mainly because our industrial might was to much for even Germany to handle. You see Germany was equiped only for a short Blitz style war, Hitler even admitted that he expected Europe to be his in a matter of a couple of years. When the war dragged on and on he started to lose troops and equipment and then he made the fateful mistake of joining Japan in declaring war on America. That sealed his fate, but yes he did have a chance for Europe.
@MrSumsky tu nepravilbno napisal po angliyski eto bydet zvy4atb kak- you suck our dicks. a tak kak tu napisal zna4it- 4to y nix kto to otsoset. A tak voobs4e soglasen.
It was not a war against Russian / Slavic Peoples it was a War against World Bolshevism and Communism in Russia. 200.000 Russian Soldiers fight with Hitler & Nazi Germany.
Fack you! America and England have never been better! THe Amy have murdered blacks as the Germans, the Jews! The English camp in Africa Konzetrations hatt! You are not a bit better than Germany!
all those what could have been statements are just BS. history went its way and germany lost get over it but if it makes you feel better in a parallel universe germany probably has won and more people died.
russsians were animals.. they won the war out of luck! not tactics... had the winter hadn't been so harsh the germans would of steamrolled them into oblivion! had germany not had to many fronts to attend they would of anhilated them.... had germany not been so damn heavily out numbered by the russians we'd all be speaking deutch right now...
@ItaMick You obviously don't know what You're talking about. Operation Uranus, Operation Bagration? Those were great strategical movements. So who was stupid? For me - German commanders. They were planning to reach Ural and Volga, before winter, in few months, with 70% of transport based on horses. Check the distance. And they even didn't equip soldiers with winter uniforms, just in case. How You can plan invasion without including weather conditions? Those guys aren't morons?
@Florek112 wow, very informative, but in fact who is the real moron here? Germany had only equipped their troops with summer uniforms, because they "the commanders/generals" believed that they were going to drive straight for Moscow and not get distracted by Stalingrad, or help the Italians and Greeks defeat their enemy's, having not been distracted by these inferior allies, the Germans would have been in Moscow before winter, and would have pushed the reds over the urial mountains
@88KRUZE after doing so they would have been happy, im sure with the amount of land aquired, and who knows what would have happened, point period they should have finished off the brits in 1940, and the japs "like before" should have attacked the Russians from the east as they did in the early 30's thus causing the 200,000 Russian reinforcements that were heading further west to Stalingrad to have been delayed thus again altering the course of the war, german could have done it, but because of
@88KRUZE a idiot/ moron for a self imposed Feildmarshal we will never know what the outcome would have been, and by idiot/moron i mean HITLER not the German high command
@88KRUZE Part1: If someone writes stupidities like ItaMick, you can only respond on his level. 1. Battle of Moscow - December 41'. Stalingrad - winter 42'-43'. Could You explain me, how Stalingrad "distracted" Germans in 41' campaign? 2. Barbarossa couldn't start earlier, even if there was no Balkan campaign. Also due to the weather. Instead of winter, Wehrmacht would stuck in spring mud, right after the start of operation. Because summer came pretty late in Soviet Union in 41'.
@88KRUZE Part2: 3. Invasion on Great Britain in 40' was impossible, even with Battle of Britain won. Germans didn't even have enough ships to launch See Loewe. 4. Japan should attack USSR... with what? 75% of their army was engaged in China. Next part in South-Eastern Asia. The army in Manchuria was too weak. much weaker than Soviet Far East forces. Not even mentioning poor quality of Japanese land army and worse equipment. Battle with Soviets over Khalkhin Gol in 39' showed it clearly.
@mrsblau2992 O.K. My question is simple: With what they would transport forces to Britain? And what Japanese forces were able to attack USSR between 41' and 45'. Not even mentioning that sinking whole fleet such big as Royal Navy was impossible for Luftwaffe in short amount of time. Especially that German's almost didn't have torpedo bombers. And only diving bombers are not enough.
@Florek112 with same things they transport themself to norway, if the ''whole'' royal navy stayed in english channel they would have big cassulites (especialy battleships which are easiest to destroy from air and are most expensive) and keep in mind that royal navy has to: escort covoys, fight in medditeriaen, defend india, defend far east...
japanese destroy 2 british battleships in just one day when they attack singapoore
@mrsblau2992 Part1:What? Compare number of soldiers used in Norway with amount needed to conquer GB! I will tell You: In Schniewind and Halder's plan, base to See Loewe, they had to use about 13 divisions. GB was defended by 29 divsions (with lack in heavy equipment, but they were there). To transport them in 2 strategical drops, they needed ships of total 2 mln DWT. Whole German fleet had ships of total 1,485 DWT, including passenger ships, etc. Also they didn't have specialized...
@mrsblau2992 Problem is it's completely unrealistic. Destroy Royal Navy one by one? How? I think You forgot, that northern part of the island, including main fleet base in Scapa Flow was beyond range of German planes.It was proven during WW2, that only planes won't paralise such big fleet. Examples: Dunkirk, Crete, many on Pacific. So "Luftwaffe could destroy british ships" is nonsense. Regia Marina wasn't able to flow on Channel (Gibraltar). French? Japanese? It's a joke, right?
@Florek112 luftwaffe could destroy fleet in english channel, meaning if royal navy was guarding it, it would have many cassulties...if they r at their base noone would guard channel and remember norway and pearl harbour
regia marina had one of the best and modern fleet in the world but they still lose it cuz of open seas doctrine they didnt had(carriers, naval aircrafts, radars...)
vichy france took french fleet and germans wanted to take it but british destroyed their few battleships...
@mrsblau2992 Few facts are wrong: Vichy fleet - read about Operation Catapult. Pearl Harbor is a great example - US fleet wasn't paralised after. In Norway also Royal Navy was operating easily. Now I can agree - If they are waiting, and preparing to ivasion for few years - it could be possible. Surely not in 40'-41'. But there goes another problem. Soviets were also preparing attack on Third Reich. Not later than in 42'. So in truth Germans were between a rock and a hard place than.
@mrs Hitler totally fucked up in invading the Soviet Union when he had the RAF practically on their knees with rafts ready to invade England (operation Sealion).Stalin was worse than Hitler in ruthlessness , plus he possessed the enormous combined strength of 57 armies.yes , facing the Germans there were 57 fucking armies...this was a war of numbers Germany could just not win...Hitler should have concentrated in defeating the RAF first, but got greedy because he wanted Russian land
@mrsblau2992 Part2: ...ships to transport vehicles, so only one division could take them. Germans started to confiscate all, even smallest ships in occupied countries. Finally they cataloged fleet, that were able to transport soldiers - thousands of river barges, ferries, and other scrap, that were sinking when sea was at 2 on Beaufort. Of course all this "fleet" wasn't able to deliver soldiers and vehicles right to the shore. So they planned to use low-draft barges to take them...
@mrsblau2992 Part3: from ships. Imagine how long it would take. Moreover - all that ships had to be prepared - mount loading cranes, etc. Due to German estimates - it would take near 2 months if they use all available shipyards. Do I mentioned, that whole this fleet was busy, transporting Swedish ore, and doing other jobs? So they tried to produce some rafts. Bavarian engineers were doing that. Few of them sunk in harbor, at calm sea. Next problem: invasion was possible only, when..
@mrsblau2992 Part4: Channel was calm. And it isn't usuall. So after BoB, the closest date was in half of August, than possibly in September. Later weather was preventing the invasion. Moreover: Southern coast of England was defended by more than 600 guns, mostly in concrete shelters. Not mentioning naval mines. Also - invasion was planned near Dover. In the most fortified region - triangle: Dover, London, Wight Island. About Royal Navy - Brits had 70 destroyers on Island, with 40...
@mrsblau2992 Part5 ...of them only ready to repell invasion. Germans had 11 all available. Disproportion in other in other types was only bigger. And it was impossible to use U-boats in Channel. I can give You detailed info, what ships were stationing nearby. To repell invasion, because escorting convoys, and other jobs was on other ships. To look at the possibility of Luftwaffe stopping them: one word: Dunkirk. RN would take few losses, but even with 2 battleships lost, invasion...
@mrsblau2992 Part6: ...would be massacred, including that few ships were enough to sunk whole "invasion fleet" of that quality Germans had. Invasion was impossible. Hitler knew that. About Japanese in Manchuria - check what they had, check what Soviets had (Far East forces stationing there all time, so it wouldn't change anything), and answer Yourself if that Japanese attack is a difference. I could write another 6 posts about it but don't see sense. Greetings for You. ;)
if the germans won at stalingrad they would have been able to get to the oil in the caucasus mountains and history would have played out very differently.
Had Hitler listened to his Generals, Germany would of won the war. Hitler was a poor tactician and only had credits because the vast and quick German conquest of France.
Hitler's mistake was opening too many fronts at once. It is okay if you have many enemies. But you must avoid confrontation with ALL of them at the same time. He should've brought the operations in the western front to a logical conclusion first (ie defeating Britain, further strengthen the fortifications in France) and only then begun the Eastern theater of operations. And, I don't understand why he declared war on USA (US had direct provocation from the Japanese and not Germans). Unnecessary!!
@TheChromelover US was supplying UK and the germans captured a US Freighter by accident it was either germany or the US who were gonna decalre war on each other
@TheChromelover : the reason Hitler had to declare war on the USA was because of the Axis pact they signed with Italy and Japan. It was in the treaty that if anyone of them were attacked or had war declared upon them, then they would come to the aid of that country: hence Germany declared war on the US for declaring war on Japan.
Having attacked to Soviet Union fascist Germany has signed to itself the death sentence. In 1945 the most bloody war in mankind history has ended with full defeat of fascists. As great Russian commander Alexander Nevsky has told: "Who with a sword to us will come, that from a sword and will be lost!"
And Romanians absolutely to be at war are not able.
@DerRussischeMensch wer hat denn am ende in berlin gewütet? frauen und kinder vergewaltigt? will ja nicht sagen, dass die deutschen das nicht gemacht hätten aber nicht in diesem ausmaß.
the only reason Hitler failed is because the USA suplied the russians with money and arms and because he did not end the UK. The winter and the actual mass of russia was just a plus.
lolcatish 2 days ago
The biggest mistake committed by Hitler in the war. He was too anxious to win his "war on Bolshevism" and exterminate the Slavic race (my race) and colonize their land that he forgot about Britain still being at war with him as well as the fact that he soon declared war on the United States.
XxI3ioHazardxX 2 days ago
@XxI3ioHazardxX He didn't declared war on United States. USA became hostile of Germany because US was attacked by Japan Empire in Pearl Harbor. Fascist Italy, Nazi Germany and Japan Empire was all allies. So USA by attacking Japan became enemy of Germany and Italy. Also he thought that he wold beat USSR easily because USSR failed to annex Finland and to him USSR was pathetic country. But the cold winter of Russia destroyed his hopes to beat slavs and communism.
BaltijosTigras 2 days ago
@BaltijosTigras Ummmmm you are so wrong! Hitler the day after Japan attacked Pearl Harbor declared war on the US! LOL you really need to read history more. No Offense bro but if you are going to type shit try looking at a history book before you spout shit, look it up I dare you, HITLER DID DECLARE WAR ON THE USA! That is why we fought the European war first and the pacific second. Had Hitler not declared war on us, we would have only concentrated on the Japanese and WW2 may have been different.
StreetFighterFan86 1 day ago
@BaltijosTigras Here bro just so you cant say I did not back myself up with proof. news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/december/11/newsid_3532000/3532401.stm. Here is the link to the news article about Hitler's dumbass mistake that you say he did not make. Now go read a damn history book, NO MORE POSTING for you until you learn something!
StreetFighterFan86 1 day ago
@StreetFighterFan86 STFU i know history better than you do and i know who was in a war with who. Even he declared war on USA he pretty much fought alone with everyone and it surprising he lasted as long as he did. Germany was really strong but Hitler just like Stalin was an idiot.
BaltijosTigras 1 day ago
@BaltijosTigras Well moron if you knew history more than me which I doubt then why did you claim that he DID NOT declare war on us and then now turn around and change your story when I just proved your sorry no nothing ass wrong, huh? Yeah you know nothing, now as for Hitler being strong, I do agree, he was in command of one of the most powerful armies. His mistake was declaring war on America which was the strongest industrial might at the time, if he had left us alone he would have won. And ..
StreetFighterFan86 1 day ago
@BaltijosTigras no again you show how little of history you know. He had many allies, Japan, Russia (for a time), Romania (which had a strong army), Italy (which had one of the worlds largest fleets at that time), Bulgaria, Norway, Hungary, Finland (yes Finland was an ally as Wikipedia states), Albania, Montenegro, Serbia, Slovakia, and was in negotiations with Ireland and Mexico to open fronts against America's south and Britain's west. So no Hitler had allies, he simply kept making...
StreetFighterFan86 1 day ago
@BaltijosTigras Military blunder after blunder which combined with America's industrial might to keep pumping out tanks, ships, and ammunition finally crippled the Axis war machine. Was Hitler a fool at times, yes he was, but by no means was he alone, far from it he even had allies in the catholic church and in America. Trust me he was not alone! Once again you simply show that your knowledge of history is low. Just please stop talking now, don't make me break out my WW2 history book again!
StreetFighterFan86 1 day ago
@StreetFighterFan86 tell me how some catholic churches can help him win the war. Now you telling me that because i didn't knew that he had supporters in churches my history knowledge is low? FU! Anyway WW2 helped USA to get a lot of money and finally end the great depression :D. Anyway im young so i can still learn pretty a lot and i will do that. Anyway USA now collapsing so i can wish only luck for Iran.
BaltijosTigras 16 hours ago
@BaltijosTigras Wow now you really are showing how stupid you are lol. America is not collapsing you moron child! America like the rest of the world was in a economic depression and now if you bother to read news reports America's economy is coming back to life and so are some of the other nations of the world, how stupid are you anyway? America went through a depression many times in her history, the 1920's, 1950's and the 1980's. Each time America bounced back like all nations do. Lol moron!
StreetFighterFan86 9 hours ago
@StreetFighterFan86 Whatever i guess you are fat ass dumbass who sits in Mcdonalds all day and thinks that he is clever :D Just like i thought - another stupid fat american XD
BaltijosTigras 8 hours ago
Comment removed
StreetFighterFan86 9 hours ago
@XxI3ioHazardxX You are right, Hitler was a fool to join Japan in declaring war on the USA. America had the best industrial might of all nations combined in those days. Why he thought he could beat America, Britain, Russia, and Canada I do not know, perhaps no one ever will.
StreetFighterFan86 1 day ago
@StreetFighterFan86 Hitler, actually could beat all of those countries...with the right choices and strategy, but Hitler, like Stalin, we're fools, tought their armies we're invincible.
dar260 1 day ago
@dar260 No once America entered the war it was over, mainly because our industrial might was to much for even Germany to handle. You see Germany was equiped only for a short Blitz style war, Hitler even admitted that he expected Europe to be his in a matter of a couple of years. When the war dragged on and on he started to lose troops and equipment and then he made the fateful mistake of joining Japan in declaring war on America. That sealed his fate, but yes he did have a chance for Europe.
StreetFighterFan86 1 day ago
IMI PLACE..IMI PLAC GERMANII!!!
hieroglif100 5 days ago
Сосе..те вы лохи(YOU HAVE BLOWJOB)!!! Нас не когда не победить!!!
MrSumsky 1 week ago
@MrSumsky tu nepravilbno napisal po angliyski eto bydet zvy4atb kak- you suck our dicks. a tak kak tu napisal zna4it- 4to y nix kto to otsoset. A tak voobs4e soglasen.
sahsa7777777 6 days ago
Thats why i like Russia.Cause its drinking tea while cockroaches r fighting between them if Russia is good or bad.
MrMethadrine 1 week ago
It was not a war against Russian / Slavic Peoples it was a War against World Bolshevism and Communism in Russia. 200.000 Russian Soldiers fight with Hitler & Nazi Germany.
CroatianWerwolf 1 week ago
German barbarians
mishka902 1 week ago
@mishka902
Fack you! America and England have never been better! THe Amy have murdered blacks as the Germans, the Jews! The English camp in Africa Konzetrations hatt! You are not a bit better than Germany!
TheMcNorden 1 week ago
@TheMcNorden I am a Russian, from Russia, I do not care about USA and England, let them kick the bucket, they are cattle.
mishka902 1 week ago
all those what could have been statements are just BS. history went its way and germany lost get over it but if it makes you feel better in a parallel universe germany probably has won and more people died.
immortaltq 2 weeks ago
whats the name of the song please
Alexsuper15 2 weeks ago in playlist Wisse
This has been flagged as spam show
GERMANY SUCK MY DICK (finger)
PROOOBG 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Scheiss Nazis!haben schön auf die Fresse bekommen in Russland!
mistersatinlover 4 weeks ago
russsians were animals.. they won the war out of luck! not tactics... had the winter hadn't been so harsh the germans would of steamrolled them into oblivion! had germany not had to many fronts to attend they would of anhilated them.... had germany not been so damn heavily out numbered by the russians we'd all be speaking deutch right now...
ItaMick 4 weeks ago
@ItaMick I disagree, Stalin's counter attack in stalingrad was very good use of tactics, plus the Germans were also defeated by the Russian winter.
Tom7953 4 weeks ago
@ItaMick You obviously don't know what You're talking about. Operation Uranus, Operation Bagration? Those were great strategical movements. So who was stupid? For me - German commanders. They were planning to reach Ural and Volga, before winter, in few months, with 70% of transport based on horses. Check the distance. And they even didn't equip soldiers with winter uniforms, just in case. How You can plan invasion without including weather conditions? Those guys aren't morons?
Florek112 3 weeks ago
@Florek112 wow, very informative, but in fact who is the real moron here? Germany had only equipped their troops with summer uniforms, because they "the commanders/generals" believed that they were going to drive straight for Moscow and not get distracted by Stalingrad, or help the Italians and Greeks defeat their enemy's, having not been distracted by these inferior allies, the Germans would have been in Moscow before winter, and would have pushed the reds over the urial mountains
88KRUZE 3 weeks ago
@88KRUZE after doing so they would have been happy, im sure with the amount of land aquired, and who knows what would have happened, point period they should have finished off the brits in 1940, and the japs "like before" should have attacked the Russians from the east as they did in the early 30's thus causing the 200,000 Russian reinforcements that were heading further west to Stalingrad to have been delayed thus again altering the course of the war, german could have done it, but because of
88KRUZE 3 weeks ago
@88KRUZE a idiot/ moron for a self imposed Feildmarshal we will never know what the outcome would have been, and by idiot/moron i mean HITLER not the German high command
88KRUZE 3 weeks ago
@88KRUZE Part1: If someone writes stupidities like ItaMick, you can only respond on his level. 1. Battle of Moscow - December 41'. Stalingrad - winter 42'-43'. Could You explain me, how Stalingrad "distracted" Germans in 41' campaign? 2. Barbarossa couldn't start earlier, even if there was no Balkan campaign. Also due to the weather. Instead of winter, Wehrmacht would stuck in spring mud, right after the start of operation. Because summer came pretty late in Soviet Union in 41'.
Florek112 3 weeks ago
@88KRUZE Part2: 3. Invasion on Great Britain in 40' was impossible, even with Battle of Britain won. Germans didn't even have enough ships to launch See Loewe. 4. Japan should attack USSR... with what? 75% of their army was engaged in China. Next part in South-Eastern Asia. The army in Manchuria was too weak. much weaker than Soviet Far East forces. Not even mentioning poor quality of Japanese land army and worse equipment. Battle with Soviets over Khalkhin Gol in 39' showed it clearly.
Florek112 3 weeks ago
@Florek112 if battle of britain was won, luftwaffe would swap off royal navy in english channel and carry on the invasion.
japan had fanatic army, they would just engage soviets and fighting a defensive war in the east so hitler would have better chance
mrsblau2992 2 weeks ago
@mrsblau2992 O.K. My question is simple: With what they would transport forces to Britain? And what Japanese forces were able to attack USSR between 41' and 45'. Not even mentioning that sinking whole fleet such big as Royal Navy was impossible for Luftwaffe in short amount of time. Especially that German's almost didn't have torpedo bombers. And only diving bombers are not enough.
Florek112 2 weeks ago
@Florek112 with same things they transport themself to norway, if the ''whole'' royal navy stayed in english channel they would have big cassulites (especialy battleships which are easiest to destroy from air and are most expensive) and keep in mind that royal navy has to: escort covoys, fight in medditeriaen, defend india, defend far east...
japanese destroy 2 british battleships in just one day when they attack singapoore
mrsblau2992 1 week ago
@mrsblau2992 Part1:What? Compare number of soldiers used in Norway with amount needed to conquer GB! I will tell You: In Schniewind and Halder's plan, base to See Loewe, they had to use about 13 divisions. GB was defended by 29 divsions (with lack in heavy equipment, but they were there). To transport them in 2 strategical drops, they needed ships of total 2 mln DWT. Whole German fleet had ships of total 1,485 DWT, including passenger ships, etc. Also they didn't have specialized...
Florek112 1 week ago
@Florek112 air superiority most importants things
if RAF was destroyed. Luftwaffe could easily destroy british ships one by one(keep in mind that battleships are easiest to hit)
ofcourse not in the middle of invasion, i agree german could win british on sea
they could only invade britain if there was no ressitance on sea...not shores
in 1940/1941 they could use french, italian, japanese fleet
and of course what im saying isnt very realistic but it wasnt impossible(if luftwaffe destroyed RAF)
mrsblau2992 1 week ago
@mrsblau2992 Problem is it's completely unrealistic. Destroy Royal Navy one by one? How? I think You forgot, that northern part of the island, including main fleet base in Scapa Flow was beyond range of German planes.It was proven during WW2, that only planes won't paralise such big fleet. Examples: Dunkirk, Crete, many on Pacific. So "Luftwaffe could destroy british ships" is nonsense. Regia Marina wasn't able to flow on Channel (Gibraltar). French? Japanese? It's a joke, right?
Florek112 1 week ago
@Florek112 luftwaffe could destroy fleet in english channel, meaning if royal navy was guarding it, it would have many cassulties...if they r at their base noone would guard channel and remember norway and pearl harbour
regia marina had one of the best and modern fleet in the world but they still lose it cuz of open seas doctrine they didnt had(carriers, naval aircrafts, radars...)
vichy france took french fleet and germans wanted to take it but british destroyed their few battleships...
mrsblau2992 1 week ago
@mrsblau2992 Few facts are wrong: Vichy fleet - read about Operation Catapult. Pearl Harbor is a great example - US fleet wasn't paralised after. In Norway also Royal Navy was operating easily. Now I can agree - If they are waiting, and preparing to ivasion for few years - it could be possible. Surely not in 40'-41'. But there goes another problem. Soviets were also preparing attack on Third Reich. Not later than in 42'. So in truth Germans were between a rock and a hard place than.
Florek112 1 week ago
@Florek112
what im saying its unrealist but possible.
but it was only possible if:
-German gains air superiority
-German delay invasion(probably few years, british would rebuild the army)
-Germans do not attack SSSR(at that time they were allies)
-Germans build more aircrafts, yeah and transport ships
British alone would probably lose the war without invasion on birtain
if still german attacked britian that would be though fight
mrsblau2992 1 week ago
@Florek112 and british could even lose at late 1940
if germans insted of making bismarck and tripitz made more uboats
mrsblau2992 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mrs Hitler totally fucked up in invading the Soviet Union when he had the RAF practically on their knees with rafts ready to invade England (operation Sealion).Stalin was worse than Hitler in ruthlessness , plus he possessed the enormous combined strength of 57 armies.yes , facing the Germans there were 57 fucking armies...this was a war of numbers Germany could just not win...Hitler should have concentrated in defeating the RAF first, but got greedy because he wanted Russian land
Cowboyssuckcock100 1 week ago
@mrsblau2992 Part2: ...ships to transport vehicles, so only one division could take them. Germans started to confiscate all, even smallest ships in occupied countries. Finally they cataloged fleet, that were able to transport soldiers - thousands of river barges, ferries, and other scrap, that were sinking when sea was at 2 on Beaufort. Of course all this "fleet" wasn't able to deliver soldiers and vehicles right to the shore. So they planned to use low-draft barges to take them...
Florek112 1 week ago
@mrsblau2992 Part3: from ships. Imagine how long it would take. Moreover - all that ships had to be prepared - mount loading cranes, etc. Due to German estimates - it would take near 2 months if they use all available shipyards. Do I mentioned, that whole this fleet was busy, transporting Swedish ore, and doing other jobs? So they tried to produce some rafts. Bavarian engineers were doing that. Few of them sunk in harbor, at calm sea. Next problem: invasion was possible only, when..
Florek112 1 week ago
@mrsblau2992 Part4: Channel was calm. And it isn't usuall. So after BoB, the closest date was in half of August, than possibly in September. Later weather was preventing the invasion. Moreover: Southern coast of England was defended by more than 600 guns, mostly in concrete shelters. Not mentioning naval mines. Also - invasion was planned near Dover. In the most fortified region - triangle: Dover, London, Wight Island. About Royal Navy - Brits had 70 destroyers on Island, with 40...
Florek112 1 week ago
@mrsblau2992 Part5 ...of them only ready to repell invasion. Germans had 11 all available. Disproportion in other in other types was only bigger. And it was impossible to use U-boats in Channel. I can give You detailed info, what ships were stationing nearby. To repell invasion, because escorting convoys, and other jobs was on other ships. To look at the possibility of Luftwaffe stopping them: one word: Dunkirk. RN would take few losses, but even with 2 battleships lost, invasion...
Florek112 1 week ago
@mrsblau2992 Part6: ...would be massacred, including that few ships were enough to sunk whole "invasion fleet" of that quality Germans had. Invasion was impossible. Hitler knew that. About Japanese in Manchuria - check what they had, check what Soviets had (Far East forces stationing there all time, so it wouldn't change anything), and answer Yourself if that Japanese attack is a difference. I could write another 6 posts about it but don't see sense. Greetings for You. ;)
Florek112 1 week ago
@Florek112 i dont know how many japanese were in manchuria but they could just fight
hitler would have bigger chances to defeat soviets quickly it was just big risk and japan didnt take that risk probably cuz it wasnt very reasonble
mrsblau2992 1 week ago
Germany had to destroy UK before invading Russia.....
PrinceSamanti 4 weeks ago
@PrinceSamanti yes and they damn right should and could of done it
ItaMick 4 weeks ago
if the germans won at stalingrad they would have been able to get to the oil in the caucasus mountains and history would have played out very differently.
fraserfir19 4 weeks ago
@fraserfir19
Stalingard was not important....
Gugerian said to Hitler that Moscow was the priority.....
PrinceSamanti 4 weeks ago
Had Hitler listened to his Generals, Germany would of won the war. Hitler was a poor tactician and only had credits because the vast and quick German conquest of France.
ItaMick 1 month ago
@ItaMick aggree.. the answer was Manstein, this guy was a genius!
clintinterface 1 month ago
The german people had a national socialism not a fascism
Beowulfar 1 month ago
another big blunder by that idiot Hitler. If the Generals were running the war, Germany would have won. thank god, that didnt happen.
usaeagle1776 1 month ago
@usaeagle1776
so true! Hitler had the best generals a leader could dream of!
TheMaidenTribute 1 month ago
@TheMaidenTribute :true. thank god Hitler was in control.
usaeagle1776 1 month ago
russia is not like french,u captured the capital,they will still resist.
no country loss 6 million men in the battle of kharkov 1942 n still continue the struggle
hlimkb 1 month ago
@hlimkb
Because Russia has two capital's.
And Hitler never conquered Moscow, hence without the Sixth army, he lost Russia.
RyanBrooksby 1 month ago
@RyanBrooksby
napoleon occupied moscow but still lost.
it is like u occupied washington,that does not mean the us military complex will yield so to speak.
hlimkb 1 month ago
A full on spearhead directed straight towar moscow in early march would have destroyed russia
Killerkolt88 1 month ago
Müsst ich auch das Größte geben
Aufrecht schied ich aus dem Leben
Was zählt schon meine Wenigkeit
Gegen Deutschlands heilig Ewigkeit! *****5*****
EdelweissRS 2 months ago in playlist Weitere Videos von Wehrmacht10
Scheiss Nazis haben schön auf die Fresse bekommen in Russland und Adolfs Untergang war langsam besiegelt!:)
mistersatinlover 2 months ago
@mistersatinlover da sieht man mal wieder, dass die meisten keine ahnung von geschichte haben.
noo0oob18 2 months ago
@noo0oob18 und du hast Achnung!?
mistersatinlover 2 months ago
@mistersatinlover anscheinend mehr als du^^
noo0oob18 4 weeks ago
Hitler's mistake was opening too many fronts at once. It is okay if you have many enemies. But you must avoid confrontation with ALL of them at the same time. He should've brought the operations in the western front to a logical conclusion first (ie defeating Britain, further strengthen the fortifications in France) and only then begun the Eastern theater of operations. And, I don't understand why he declared war on USA (US had direct provocation from the Japanese and not Germans). Unnecessary!!
TheChromelover 3 months ago
@TheChromelover Britain unbeatable so he was of to a non starter
ramaslama 2 months ago
@ramaslama haha uk unbeatable thats funny
azulon84 1 month ago
@azulon84 Well not for a thousand years at least
ramaslama 1 month ago
@TheChromelover US was supplying UK and the germans captured a US Freighter by accident it was either germany or the US who were gonna decalre war on each other
alekzander2010 1 month ago
@TheChromelover : the reason Hitler had to declare war on the USA was because of the Axis pact they signed with Italy and Japan. It was in the treaty that if anyone of them were attacked or had war declared upon them, then they would come to the aid of that country: hence Germany declared war on the US for declaring war on Japan.
usaeagle1776 1 month ago
Having attacked to Soviet Union fascist Germany has signed to itself the death sentence. In 1945 the most bloody war in mankind history has ended with full defeat of fascists. As great Russian commander Alexander Nevsky has told: "Who with a sword to us will come, that from a sword and will be lost!"
And Romanians absolutely to be at war are not able.
DerRussischeMensch 3 months ago
@DerRussischeMensch wer hat denn am ende in berlin gewütet? frauen und kinder vergewaltigt? will ja nicht sagen, dass die deutschen das nicht gemacht hätten aber nicht in diesem ausmaß.
noo0oob18 2 months ago
@DerRussischeMensch the germans were not fascist it was the italians
Rhexx18 1 month ago
This original song from this video.Very good!
Fahapoca 5 months ago
Too bad they failed so hard and got pwnt by the russians, right?
EvilJellyBean1 7 months ago