Added: 2 years ago
From: Kumicho
Views: 24,118
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (93)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • ping ping need new flash supresser

  • learn how to shoot. its a 556.

  • Iraqi fuckers, get some!

  • @TheHateHarbinger wow, thats not how we want are sons and daughter to think when we send them over seas

  • @mrsquishyboots Really? You want our sons and daughters to think "Oh those peaceful Iraqi people that only killed 3,000 of us in 9/11 we're overreacting"? You fucking liberal democratic anti american piece of trash.

  • @TheHateHarbinger irag was not involved in 9/11 please dont keep pushing that lie. encouraging genocide will cause alot more harm to our troops and its not our mission in iraq. maintaining the morals of the best western nation does not mean i hate this nation.....

  • @TheHateHarbinger

    Iraq wasn't involved in 9/11 you stupid redneck fuck. It was mostly Saudis, some iranians and egyptians and syrians. How about doing your research before you shoot insults, dipshit?

  • @iRentallyMetarded "Iraq wasn't involved in 9/11... It was mostly Saudis, some iranians and egyptians" You just contradicted yourself you fucking retarded piece of nigger shit. Go back to your immoral, and uneducated African Tribe and send back someone more intelligent for arguing. U mad bro?

  • @TheHateHarbinger

    Lol how? Idiot, do your research, then come back, k? I want you to find ANY form of evidence that proves Iraq had ANYTHING to do with 9/11. Until then, stfu.

  • @iRentallyMetarded How? You said no Iraqis were involved, then you said they were. Ive done my research, but no matter WHAT i say you won't listen. Because you're a democratic piece of trash. This is the part where you insult me again and feel like youve won right?

  • @TheHateHarbinger

    When did I say Iraqis had anything to do with 9/11? I said Iranians, and if my 3rd grade social studies teacher was correct, Iraq /= Iran. Idiot.

  • Yes but on realising that this would greatly improve the US military's effectiveness at troop level, the US military came to it's senses and quickly withdrew all the rifles from active service. Phew. A threat of improvement averted! Soon the morale in the barracks will be so beaten down they'll all be celebrating when the new stock of potato guns arrive, courtesy of colt.

  • Yup it is a Mk16 and the mag is a standard STANAG mag ;)

  • how´s your killstreak ?? LOL

  • I like the MK17 more, because i don`t like 5.56mm.

  • good gun bad video

  • this guy does not know how to handle a full auto firearm

  • I hear some Asian in the background... saying don't stop, don't stop.. if i'm not mistaken...

  • Yo dawg, I heard you like sights, so I put a holo and a red dot, so you can aim while you aim.

  • What branch of the military are you in?

  • @sk8wise12 Probably a contractor...

  • DOES ANYONE KNOW IF YOU CAN BUY REAL WEAPONS (FIREARMS) IN THE UK< IF ANYONE KNOWS PLEASE REPLY TO ME THNX = )

  • @Jacko180589 they do have laws banning ownership if you are not in the army or police force. I hear this all the time in the states.

  • I dont understand the need of making new rifles. Our enemy is always going to use an AK-47 anyways. So why upgrade our main rifles. Waste of money.

  • @kicknbazz1615 Uh dude the M4 and M16 are very unreliable thats why duh.Besides the SCAR L and SCAR H arnt used by the regular army or Marines,Thats why our army is testing the ACR if it passes the M4 and m16 will be replaced by ACRs.NOT A WASTE OF MONEY

  • You have no clue what your talking about

  • @kicknbazz1615 hahaha whatever kid atleast i know what im talking about.

  • 2 optics?

  • thank fucking god... not a single fucking mw2 comment in this video. thank you again chuck norris.

  • my father is 66 years old, he TRAINED with the M16, and he was sent to vietnam with it.

    my sister is 35 years old, she trained with the M16, and she was sent to desert storm with it.

    My nephew is 18, he trained with the M16, and he was sent to afghanistan with it.

    Im 23, the way this fucking donkey shit , bull shit complex seems to work, my grand kids in the year 2050 will train, and be sent somewhere with the m16.

    its time to put an end this tyrant, colt now !

  • the military industrial complex is supposed to kiss the army's ass, not the other way around.

  • I wish I could fucking bomb the colt headquarters, and get away with it.

  • the absolute conformity of the US army, to the colt company, makes the M16 and M4 rifles almost the true "U.S. rifles" (communism).

    the quality of a colt is as close as possible to what you get in a communist regime, without having communism.

  • I promise you, if the army went and bought an fn herstal,

    (without forming a ridiculous relationship with the fn herstal)

    I promise you, colt will be screaming up and down like maniacs, begging the army to stop buying fn herstal, and buy colt.

    when colt gets no response, and almost goes out of fucking business, colt will start making better weapons than what they do now

    thats exactly why colt is a piece of shit because they sell pieces of shit.

    companies who sell garbage make garbage.

  • im fucking tired of the armys bigoted relationship with colt.

    and im tired of the army declining much better weapons in favor of the 40 year old m16 piece of shit.

    colt is a fucking piece of shit, and I'll tell you why.

    because of the bigoted relationship the military has with colt, colt really has no competition.

    they have no incentive to give the army a better rifle for their money.

    (your tax dollars).

  • Spec Ops Command cancelled the SCAR-L and is telling 3 out of 4 components to return the Rifles back. They are upgrading to the SCAR-H. The Story is on Military.com.

  • is this the mk17 ?

  • are these guys in afghanistan? have they deployed the scar to troops their yet?

  • i want get those nice things but I cant couse I live in mexico sucks....

  • thats MK16 MOD0

  • ummm i think thatis a mk16....scar L...5.56 not .308

  • yeah I got the vid tittles mixed up. the Mk16 is on another vid. hope you enjoy

  • recoil??

    not with you xD

  • yes it switched the Mk16 with the mk17 my bad I was rushing when I uploaded the vids. Hope yall enjoy. That is a range in Afghanistan

  • dat bitch sound hard as fuck

  • i mean the m4 is good of a weapon but why dont they make a new general use mass producable rife that can be used in medium and short ranges and that doesent jam etc and is easy to use

  • @JUGO49 I understand you mate. For the why, there are a number of reasons. Pick one from the "iconic symbol of American might" (*cough* Lies *cough*) to "It's cheap and it looks good". The FN P90 is a very very good option.

    Magazine with 50 rounds, 5.7 caliber, same barrel lenght as the m4, compact rifle with high rate of fire, fully ambidextrous.

  • the 5.7 round has no penetration and is good for close quauters when u dont want to over penatrate. but it's shit at longer ranges

  • The answer is either:

    -The Magpul Masada

    or

    -The HK416

  • FYI, that's a MK16, not a MK17. MK16 shoots the 5.56 round, and the MK17 fires the .308 round. And since that looks like an AR15 magazine, I have to assume that it's firing the 5.56 cartridge...

  • @1337airsoftgeek FYI Read the previous comments, that's been corrected...

  • the special forces use it but not the general military i think they just want to stick with the shitty m4

  • @JUGO49, the m4 is a 60 year old rifle. It served its purpose for a long time but its lossing ground to much more modern firearms.

    The H&K 416 will most likely replace the aging m4.

  • thats what i said i said the m4 is shitty and personally i dont like it

  • @JUGO49 l0l mate. Let me clarify. It's not "shitty" per se... It was designed for a different set of conditions, a older kind of battefield.

    Today's modern battlefields require different armaments, tactics and even different soldiers and training. The M4, even with the wide range of acessories, aftermarket parts and upgrades still fails to have its core design useful to those requirements.

    But this rifle as been used for 60 years. America's armed forces are used to deal with this rifle.

  • So, replacing a rifle leads to train current operatives and new recruits to operate with a different firearms. That means more investment... Big no no for them.

  • @killZ0n399 It's a beautiful looking gun I've seen a video with the grenade launcher attached and fully compact it's fucking small! I guess the military wants to stick to their guns (pun intended)

  • @go0fy11137 You mean the EGLM (Enhanced Grenade Launcher Module)? Yes, you are right. Even with it, the rifle looks beautiful, remains pratical (the EGLM comes with a undergrip to compensate for the usage of the lower rail) and capable of using all 40mm grenades that the long version M203 is capable of carrying.

  • it looks like this has about the same recoil of an ak 47, am i judging this right of is it the user? thanks for any info nice looking assault rifle...

  • @Jshaw71 Hello mate

    Like i said below, this rifle is the mk16, using the same caliber as the m4. The recoil is due to two factors: he's grabbing the weapon by the magwell; Second the shorter barrel offers a bigger recoil.

    But had one in my hands and the size of this riffle with the shorter barrels is the same size of an mp5 but with much MUCH bigger modularity.

  • so should you hold this by the underbarrel? (is that an actual term? lol) thanks for the reply...

  • @Jshaw71 Actually yes mate. Either that or with a tactical grip.

  • i see, thanks for the info, take care... have a happy new year...

  • i love this gun so much, its so great!!

  • Thats an Mk16. The Mk17 doesn't have a 30 round magazine. Only 10 and 20 round mags. And yes i counted the amount of shots. But the magazine's shape and size gives it away.

  • It's been said before. The MK16 Mod 0 currently uses M4 magazines, using the shorter 5.56mm cartriges.

    Please note that the recoil, comparing to the Mk17, is lower.

    The Mk17 uses SR-15 Magazines, capable of sporting the longer, heavier cartrige of 7.62mm. Due to size and weight of this ammo, the magazine only carries 20 rounds.

    Again, note the recoil. Is very difficult to keep an effective sighting on the target. But also note that it's capable of penetrating modern vests in just one shot.

  • Ah, when you need to spread democracy through cover that the 5.56 can't penetrate, call on this.

  • maybe it has more shooting power,but just look at the recoil of this weapon,it wouldn't be comfortable to use it in 'fast act' missions.but on the opened field this weapon sure surpass m4

  • What do you consider "fast mission"? There are no such mission. As for the recoil? Hes using the shorter barrel so the recoil will hit harder (the FN SCAR can use both long and short barrels without any fuss, unlike the M4). If he used the longer barrels, then the recoil would be the same as an M4. Like i said so many times, the caliber of the ammunition discharged is the same as an M4. The recoil's won't differ if the size of the rifle is the same.

  • Its currently being used by US Special Forces and being evaluated as a possible M4 replacement (Let all those fanboys of the m4 stay clear, this rifle as proved to be much better than it).

  • werent they gonna replace the m4 and m16 with the rec 7? this would probably b a good replacement for the m14 since its their .308.

  • k, i checked. the mk 16 (5.56) will replace the m4 and the MK 17 (.308) will b replacing the m14. i dont know in what unit or branch ittl b tho im preety sure the rangers are already using them.

  • While it is a definite improvement from an M4. The US Army, for what ever reason, said that they didn't like it. Unfortunately, it will most likely not see service in the US military. I'm upset about that. I'm enlisting into the Army in 3 years and i hope the army will reconsider using the FN SCAR's.

  • But while the army declined it, the US Special Forces, including SOCOM and Delta Force are currently using the MK16 as their assault rifle of choice.

    This is a rifle that needs to be changed according to the mission Specs. Either the Ligh or heavy version, is its longer or shorter barrel or what should it carry (AN-PEQ, Optics). The army wants something that doesn't need to be changed and that is a good compromise between everything, The Scar excels at everything but needs to be changed.

  • And for those that do not agree that this rifle is excelent for all purposes, check the modularity on the gun, it's stock, sights, and the EGLM!

    Yes, even the Grenade Launchers is ambidextrous, fully modular, futuristic and most of all, extremely reliable and functional (the trigger is right below the rifle's trigger). Beat that M4/M16 with M203 Grenade Launcher.

  • Well you see your statement is a little off. Not all SOCOM operators use the SCAR. It all depends on mission and the operators choice, and of course rank. New man usually gets the SAW. SCAR is a great gun! but after about 30,000 rounds and 5missions I broke the bolt. so FN needs to work on the QA of their materials. Well hope it was helpful

  • @Kumicho Mainly the 75th Rangers,SOCOM use them but they mainly use M4 SOPMODs.

  • @killZ0n399 and the carbine of choice is the Hk416 right? These 2 are great guns.

  • @RigelSystem217905

    The thing is that the HK416 is an equivelent to the m4, but much more improved.

    So this weapon is also popular with special force, since they are aquainted and have proper firing habits with the m4. So, the hk416 comes as a natural replacement.

  • Is this one in the US Military ?

  • Its an Mk16 or Scar-L

    And no, the mags can't be switched since the mk17 takes a different mag altogether so there is no compatibility.

  • Watch "David SCAR MK17". There you can see the MK17 mag.....

  • I think its the Mk16, cause the mag is looks smaller than the 7.62 mag, but i´m not sure about that.

  • mags can be switched so u gotta look at the stock

  • Comment removed

  • they do make 7.62 mags like that. it is also possible that its an ak mag, as the mk17 can take ak rounds

  • this doesn't look like the mk16, it IS the mk16 (look at the magazine)

  • it has too much recoil to b a 5.56 dude, its an mk 17.

  • Magazine's not the right shape or size to be a mk 17. Plus, the Mk 17 these guys shot in a different video didn't have anything on the upper rail.

  • how do u get your hands on somany nice weapons

  • this one looks like the mk16 not the 17

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more