Added: 1 year ago
From: reivenlocke
Views: 2,987
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (93)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Hansen normally interviews these guys for 10mins or so, why so short with the 22 year old virgin?

  • Sir please, please sir, sir please, please sir, sir please, please sir.

  • ouch. I usually hate the nasty pedos who get caught on this show but I actually feel sorry for this one :'(

  • he wears a "no fear" t-shirt and fears Chris Hansen when he pops out, oh the irony.

  • I love it when Chris Hansen talks dirty

  • Chris is particularly snarky with this specimen. He really turns up the snark when he senses weakness.

  • lol have a seat and you can tell me how sorry you are

  • sir please i never get tired of it

  • @deicide663

    Hansen apparently did, which is why he said, "Please WHAT?"

  • This guy reminds me of the CNA's in the hospitals I've been at. He has a thick accent, he's whiny like a bitch and he keeps proclaiming his innocence despite the fact that he's been caught red handed.

  • If this girl were of legal age, we could cut Paul Clemente a break, but the fact remains, he came to meet a CHILD for sex.

  • It's all ugly guys who cant get girls at the bars or clubs.

  • @PhillyLucky7

    Drunkeness has been getting ugly guys laid for centuries. And if he strikes out there....get a hooker. You don't have to wine and dine them, and the penalty is a lot less harsh if you get caught.

  • He hides his face, but he's wearing a No Fear shirt.

  • that was so embarrasing, hahaha, he was in a national TV

  • This slimeball says, "I'm not a criminal, sir." Ummm,...sending pics of your cock to a minor is a crime. So that pretty much makes him a criminal.

  • @TheRimmerKing In china watching porn is a criminal, so probably you would also be a criminal... at least in the eyes of the china government.

  • @Yetanotherytuser What country are you from? You can barely write properly. And what point are you trying to make? I would be a criminal in China?? This is the USA dumbass. There's nothing wrong with watching porn in the privacy of your home!! But victimizing a child is a CRIME!!! So stop trying to correlate the two.

  • @RimmingHerAnus Victimizing childs?, I don't see any child been "victimized" here, I just see some vigilante asshole luring people and then treating them as criminals.

    Because, a 22 year old asshole showed his dick to some random guy on the internet posing as a child who fucking asked for it is worse than a child being abused emotionality, verbally, and even physically by their family.

    I mean, what could be worse than showing genitalia to children?!!! IS HORRIBLE!!! THE HUMANITY!1!

  • @Yetanotherytuser Seriously, is English your second language? I'm not trying to be mean but you don't write very well. Its "Victimizing children?" not "Victimizing childs?" The plural for child is children, not childs. Let me rewrite your comment with some corrections:

    "Victimizing children? I don't see any child being "victimized" here. I just see a vigilante group luring people into a set up then treating them as criminals."

  • @RimmingHerAnus Grammar Nazis to the rescue!, It's a shame that your arguments are not on the same level of your grammar knowledge.

  • @Yetanotherytuser But that's just the point, my argument is far superior to yours. I'm not making this up. Soliciting a minor for sex and showing up at their house shows intent and is against the law. That's why these assholes get arrested and sentenced. Now whether you disagree with the law or not is up to you. I'm sure you think coming over a house to hump a minor is fine, but lawmakers in America seem to agree that it is wrong, sorry.

  • @RimmingHerAnus I'm not even talking about the "humping a child" thing, I'm saying that, IT NEVER FUCKING HAPPENED.

    This remembers me A LOT to minority report, the only difference here is that there was no crime about to be committed, they LURED people to do something that could be considered illegal if they would be real kids, but the truth here is that THEY WEREN'T.

  • @Yetanotherytuser Do you know how to read? I just told you why its against the law even if he didn't actually fuck a child. He showed up with CLEAR INTENT to have sex with a minor and that is against the law, period! Lure??? If you're not open to fucking a child, why the hell would you even fall for this lure???

  • @RimmingHerAnus Actually, they normally use the bullshit legal hole of passing state lines in order to have sex with a minor for this shit, so yeah, they are fucking luring them. And they pay the police to work for the vigilante group, and commit illegal shit, like trying to arrest someone in his fucking home who never went to the meeting, resulting in a suicide.

    Congratulations Perverted Justice, now the real predators, like family members, can continue abusing child.

  • @Yetanotherytuser Why are you so intense about this? Are you Paul Clemente or were you abused by a family member?

  • @RimmingHerAnus Do I need to be part of Paul Clemente family to believe that his arrest is wrong and stupid? I've never been abused myself, but of all the cases I personally know of abuse were either done by a family member or a close friend.

  • @Yetanotherytuser You are clearly not understanding my point. It has nothing to do with state lines or luring people or any other useless argument you make. If you were a normal person and a 12 year old on the internet asked you to come over for sex, would you go??? So how come Paul Clemente went?? You don't think that's wrong? Either you have some tendency towards pedophilia or confusion on this issue.

  • @RimmingHerAnus Or maybe you don't understand really the issue here. What you are basically saying is that just by being pedophile, NOT DOING ANYTHING, just by being pedophile you automatically deserve to be lured and imprisoned.

    I don't know if you are aware, but pedophiles need to work their sexual problems, and need to get to therapy if they are unable to control themselves, but a fucking vigilante group luring pedophiles doesn't help them.

    Pedophile is not equal Sexual Predator.

  • @Yetanotherytuser That is not what I am saying brainiac. First stop using the word "lured". Because unless you are a pedophile, you would not be "lured" by a child asking for sex. Second, these pedophiles were DOING SOMETHING!!! They showed up at a house with the intent to FUCK A CHILD. Do you understand this? How many times do I have to repeat myself? Paul Clemente = Sexual Predator because he came to this house to fuck a 13 year old. Over and over again.

  • @RimmingHerAnus Let me make just a reality check here. Let say that the person we are talking about was a gorgeous 22 year old woman who came to the house to have sex with a 13 year old boy...

    Would you have the same opinion about the whole matter?

  • @Yetanotherytuser Dude, let me do a REALITY CHECK on you. You seem to be out of touch. First of all it was not a 13 year old boy, it was a girl. Secondly, it was a 22 year old man named Paul Clemente, not a woman. Finally no it wouldn't make a difference because its still the SAME CRIME. So what is your point?

  • @RimmingHerAnus Honestly I don't think so, because in our culture if a boy have a sexual relationship with a adult woman is rarely saw as something morally wrong, even if it is a crime on the eyes of the law.

    Also, I found funny how sexual crimes are at pair with murder, just as step below. Geez, I wonder why's that?...

    Don't worry, at this point I'm not hoping for you to get it, you already proved me how you have no critical thinking.

  • @Yetanotherytuser Our culture? I absolutely don't think we are of the same culture. Your English is awful. You seem to think pedophilia is no big deal. And you have the mistaken belief that you are intelligent and witty, well, you are not. A female teacher who had sex with a 14 year old buy went to prison for 2 years and had to register as a sex offender for life. Obviously, in my culture it was seen as morally wrong. So you must be from another country.

  • @RimmingHerAnus Or maybe i'm just not from the south.

  • @Yetanotherytuser To Catch a Predator is a show about adult internet predators who are stalking children online. But you keep bringing up this side topic about family members raping family members. For example: "Congratulations Perverted Justice, now the real predators, like family members, can continue abusing child."

    Why are you so hung up on this?? We are not even talking about this but you keep bringing it up. Dude, what's really going on here?

  • @RimmingHerAnus Because there is this strange idea that kids are more at risk at the internet than in their daily lives. I'm sorry but that's not the case.

    Also, I should point out that Clemente was 22... I mean, he's still ridiculously young. If he were 4 years younger, and exactly the same happened, it wouldn't had been considered a crime.

    This is what I found fucked up about this. There are fucking up the live of a kid, because he's not going to be able to do anything with his life after this

  • @Yetanotherytuser Goddammit, why do I bother? They are not debating where children are more at risk. They are just stating that children are ALSO at risk on the internet due to online predators, okay? But again you have to hammer that point about children and family members, weird. What if it was not a set up but a real 13 year old? Paul Clemente didn't know it was a set up. He thought it was for real. So if he came and fucked a child and fucked up her life, its okay because he's 22??

  • @RimmingHerAnus Wow, just wow.

    Yeah, because the sexual experience, that she was asking for, would had been so traumatic, that would fuck her life completely. wouldn't it?.

    Yes, there is no comparison. Also, why I am bringing the whole family and close friends issue all the time?, because why not instead of waiting their time with this shit they try to really fight sexual abuse??

    Long answer short, they don't care, they are just making money by showing this shit on the air.

  • @Yetanotherytuser Listen to yourself, you sound just like a typical pedophile. You think just because a child is curious about sex that she deserves it? You don't think the experience of being sexually assaulted by an adult would be traumatic to a child? You are a monster. And you think real sexual abuse is only when a family member does it? You are insane.

  • @RimmingHerAnus You got me, because I'm trying to use reason before emotions and I don't have an static and absolute moral view, and I'm able to put me in other's shoes, even if they are considered monsters by all society, I MUST BE ONE OF THEM. Geez, I love how you are a machine of every logical fallacy there is in the book.

    Can you address ANY of my point without recurring to emotion appeals?

  • @Yetanotherytuser Who are you? Emotional appeals? Its getting tiring for me to keep correcting you. I'm the one going by the law, not emotion. You are the one making an emotional defense about the rights of pedophiles to get therapy,  they are human too....blah blah blah.

  • @RimmingHerAnus Laws are making by humans, Einstein *cough* I mean, Sherlock.

    Is the basis of the law what I see fucked up, and I'm sorry if you are just a brainless idiot who just think that a law must be right just because of it, and are not even able to discuss the basis without resorting to emotional appeals (like, you are a monster, blah blah blah).

    Sadly I just remember how most of the human race is this stupid.

  • @Yetanotherytuser Laws are making by humans? You mean laws are made by humans. I guess I must be Einstein compared to you.  Look at you trying witty, cough? Please, give it a rest. I don't just think the law is right as you put it, jackass. I just happen to agree that an adult molesting a child is a crime. Calling you a monster is not an "emotional appeal" as you keep calling it. I just feel the comment you made about the 13 year old girl getting raped was monstrous.

  • @RimmingHerAnus You are right, an emotional appeal is not an emotional appeal...... even if you use the a fucking emotional appeal fallacy.... yes... I guess I can turn off my brain by this point.

  • @Yetanotherytuser I don't think you have a brain to turn off smart guy. You keep using the words fallacy and such. Do you even know what it means? Either make a valid point about the topic or shut up. I have to be drunk to talk at your level.

  • @RimmingHerAnus LUUUUUUUUUUULZ, I think I'm starting to get it. You think using words that are not shown on daily television is somehow far fetched. Just wow.

    I'm starting to guess you are the one who doesn't get what a fallacy is, and why they are annoying when trying to have a discussion, and that's why I'm pointing out your fallacies so that you stop using them.

  • @Yetanotherytuser Whatever dude. Arguing with you is vapid and pointless. You just keep recycling the same point and its becoming boring. Read what you wrote and maybe you'll understand why its annoying, alright? I can't believe you are actually debating with me about the merits of Paul Clemente. Just stop.

  • @RimmingHerAnus Yeah, whatever dude. I'm starting to come to the realization that I'm talking to a kid... I'm sorry little buddy for using complex words, and trying to make you think a little more than what you are used to, you can go back and play Halo with your friends.

  • @Yetanotherytuser Look, you don't have to resort to your pathetic little attempts at verbal jousting. It doesn't work for you. We are on You Tube. There are no winners here. Look at us, we are arguing online and its1am. So stop trying so hard to be clever or intelligent and just accept the fact that you are not. You're just another moron on the internet, with too much time on your hands and a bad grasp of the English language. I don't know what HALO is but you go out play with it.

  • @RimmingHerAnus You are right... I'm just another moron on the internet with too much time on my hands... like yourself.

    :D

  • @Yetanotherytuser Oh my god, hahahahaha. I just saw your pic, your some little oriental dude. No wonder you are so angry. You're calling me a kid? Looks like you the one watching the little cartoons and stuff. I give up, leave me alone.

  • @RimmingHerAnus luuulz, you just saw my profile, and you can't realize that this is a trolling account... damn, kids these days are even more stupid.

  • @Yetanotherytuser Its alright dude, no need to get all upset. I have alot of little oriental friends. You can drop the hostility and insults. Its over. Calm down and give it a rest.

  • @RimmingHerAnus luuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuulz­, yeah, because the image from my profile is not that of the famous director Hideaki Anno.

  • @Yetanotherytuser Famous director Hideaki......sorry never heard of him. I don't think I've ever even heard that name before today. The only famous people from the Orient that I know are Bruce Lee, Jet Lee and Jackie Chan.

  • @RimmingHerAnus Yeah, probably you don't know anything outside what is mentioned on Fox News.

  • @Yetanotherytuser Dude why are you still angry. I told you put a cork in it. The arguments over. Use some of that Shaolin meditation and calm down. We're all friends now.

  • @RimmingHerAnus No, I'M angryyyy D: RAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWW. By the way, stupid jokes about what you consider "other cultures" just show how ignorant you are.

  • @Yetanotherytuser Here I'm trying to be cool and you're getting all bent out of shape. All that stuff we said earlier is done with. I'm just joking with you to calm you down because you seem all pissed off and shit. What, are you angry that I've never heard of that director guy? Well I'm sorry, I don't know who he is. Tell me some movies he's done, maybe I saw it. I don't watch a lot of foreign films so I don't know him. No need to get all hostile about it.

  • @RimmingHerAnus lulz, I recommend you to look for the term trolling

  • @RimmingHerAnus And actually, I see veeeeery dubious the legal basis for what this vigilante group does.

  • @Yetanotherytuser I'm responding to the weird reply you FIRST posted to me. You stated that I would be a criminal in China. What the fuck does being a criminal in China have to do with the show To Catch A Predator? Let me teach you something about American Law. Its all about INTENT. He solicited a minor for sex on the internet, sent her some pictures of his cock, then showed up to fuck her.

  • @RimmingHerAnus Also according to american law it is illegal to file share... and I bet you do it anyway. The point I was making is that the law doesn't reflect what is right or wrong. That's why I made the China comparison, but the truth is that I didn't even needed to go there, I could easily point out things that were laws in america and now are considered inhuman and stupid, like Prohibition of women's suffrage, Criminalization of Sodomy, Jim Crow laws, etc etc.

  • @Yetanotherytuser First of all stop assuming so much. You assume I file share, well I don't. Second, the Jim Crow laws,....blah blah blah and all that other shit you mentioned are all no longer in effect, because they were wrong. On the other hand, showing up to fuck a minor is still illegal because it is wrong. You are severely delusional. How is arresting people who show up to fuck a child "inhuman"?

  • @RimmingHerAnus And how do you determine what's right or wrong?, It is totally subjective. People on their own time said the same of "How is not allowing woman the right to vote 'inhuman'?", and of course you now consider that bullshit, because it is in fact a logical fallacy trying to make a subjective argument into objective, when it is not.

  • @Yetanotherytuser Dude, stop trying to use words in a sentence that you obviously don't know how to use. "This remembers me a lot??" Seriously, just stop it. You're all over the place with your argument. I'm stating a clear, concise and simple fact, nothing more. Regardless of the tactics used to arrest these individuals, two things remain clear: They are attracted to minors and they showed up to a house where they thought a minor was alone to have sex. Okay?

  • @RimmingHerAnus Yeah, because this is very simple, the simpler the better, we don't have to think about it, just let it be, I mean, they are fucking peoples for the rest of their lives, but they are scum and deserve it, so you can just relax and think to yourself "fucking scumbag".

  • @Yetanotherytuser No dude, there's something very strange going on here. Nobody would be this emotional about a stranger on a TV show. There are so many heroes and respectful people you could defend, but here you are defending a child molester. Why? Either you ARE Paul Clemente or you were sodomized by a friend or family member. There's just no way anyone would be this psychotic about this indefensible issue.

  • @RimmingHerAnus Then I guess you have it all figured out sherlock homes. I mean, what can I tell to someone who already declared that "IT'S IMPOSSIBLE for someone to defend something that he thinks is wrong, because I don't find it wrong!".

    On the other side, I do like the hypocrisy, just a few comments ago you said to me to stop "assuming" because I said you probably fail share, but then you assume that I must have some strange dark secret going on.

  • @Yetanotherytuser No, that is not hypocrisy idiot. Its called deductive reasoning. You assume I share file with no evidence. I deduced you have some dark secret because you YOURSELF keep bringing it up. Do you understand the difference genius?

  • @RimmingHerAnus Then I deduce by things I consider relevant, like your username that you were probably a porn star that's now trying to fight sex crimes because you knew someone who was raped by the internet, and the story shocked you so much that you were unable to get a boner ever again, so you had your job as a porn star and became a full time crime fighter...

    If you don't get the subtle sarcasm, I'm saying that's bullshit.

  • @Yetanotherytuser I don't know anyone who was raped. But I do support and donate to foundations for families of murdered and victimized children.  I don't waste my time defending predators like Paul Clemente. My username is meaningless because I find You Tube to be nothing more then a recreational diversion. I see you are resorting to being silly because my points make sense.

  • @RimmingHerAnus Oh yeah, you have me there, is not that I'm making fun of your "Rational Deduction" shit. Damn, you are good.

  • @Yetanotherytuser Not "Rational Deduction" moron, deductive reasoning. I mean you called me Sherlock Holmes, right? Well deductive reasoning is the process he uses on his cases. And yes, I AM making fun of you.

  • @RimmingHerAnus Oh n0ez!, also, let me tell you, Murder Mystery novels have very specific rules and are made to been solved by logical deductions. Sorry to tell you, real life is NOT a murder mystery novel.

  • @Yetanotherytuser God you are something. I never said life is a murder mystery moron. I was simply correcting some mistakes in your comments. And your attempts to use multi-syllabic SAT words in your response.

  • @RimmingHerAnus Erm... sherlock homes was a murder mystery character... please don't miss the fucking point, and try to develop on something completely pointless.

    Oh, another thing, let's use your "Deductive reasoning", why are you bringing so much the "YOU ARE FROM ANOTHER COUNTRY!" shit?, are you a xenophobe or some shit like that?

  • @Yetanotherytuser No, I'm not a xenophobe, sheesh another SAT word. Its just that some of your grammatical errors are fucking annoying. And you're the one with the completely pointless observations. So stop trying to flip it on me.

  • @RimmingHerAnus Sorry for being dyslexic. (What the fuck with your obsession with SAT). Also, just to fill you in, the xenophobe thing was another sarcastic joke... guess you didn't get it.

  • @Yetanotherytuser Who would be able to get the nonsense you write? I don't have an obsession with the SAT, I just like to make fun of you when you use the big words from your thesaurus. And don't worry, I don't think dyslexic, you are much worse.

  • @RimmingHerAnus You don't think dyslexic?... ooook. Is good to know that.

  • Comment removed

  • He said he's not a criminal! They should have just let him go!!

  • Coming soon to a theater near you: The 22 year old virgin staring Paul Clemente! LOL

  • Ok, I know married couples that have an age difference of 9 years between them.

    This is really cruel and stupid, there are REAL predators on the web, and this one here is obviously not one of them, but either way they just fucked him for life, way to go.

  • @Yetanotherytuser

    That'll make other 22 year olds think twice before showing their dick to a minor. When it comes to the law, you have to "shoot a hostage" to show everyone else that you mean business.

  • @Yetanotherytuser Theres obviously a difference between 22 and 13 and 30 and 21. You're obviously missing the point.

  • @RashadT Am I?, Can you point it out for me?, or are you just going to sit there telling me I'm wrong without saying why?

  • What cruelty and madness

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more