Added: 3 years ago
From: golotitore
Views: 97,271
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (100)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • bad m3 driver

  • Now they gotta put up the 1M vs the M3

  • the 1M could do it

  • a wise man said: if the turbo spins, bullshit ends

  • yea I'm not sure why every single bmw m3 vs 135i video I watch, the 135i wins. The best I see is the m3 matching the 135i. I thought the m3 was significantly faster?!? wtf?

  • wow, another example of someone who doesn't know how to drive an m3, the coupe typically pulls an 12.8 1/4 mile

  • @khyron4 the stock M3 quarter mile listed by the company itself is 13.5 seconds. Check it out.

  • But I wanna know how both perform on a track!!!

  • el tio del m3 salio mal

  • BMW FTW!!

  • I would take the 135i with the M package. I love the M cars but they are a pain to own. Higher insurance and crazy matinence Costs. The E46 M3 need like 10w 60 for oil. Unless you have the car under warrantee M car are expensive to own.

  • it cos of the gear box ratio

  • STARTO!

  • 135 will hang and maybe even beat the M3 in a short drag depending on the M3 driver. You'll get a lot of wheelspin with the M3, so it depends on how the driver corrals the car on takeoff. Longer drag the M3 should win every time. The zipperhead driving the M3 doesn't know how to shift either.

  • BULLSHIT

  • fuck everyone who down talk either cars. they are both nice as shit. the fact the the 135i puts up such a good fight is awesome but it wont always win and somtimes it will. depends on drivers or mods. in my opinion the 135i is a better car because of the GREATLY cheaper price

  • 1.35 beats because it has twin turbo. In long distances, of course M3 is better...

  • Does not matter. M3 is a V8 with high-revving engine. M3 consistently beats the 135 in a 1/4 mile every single time. I know it because I have two friends with these cars and after the first 50 feet, the M3 r*pes the stock 135 every single time.

    A stock 135 runs 13.4 - 13.5 secs while an M3 runs 12.6 - 12.7.

    M3 makes 120 HP more and has much shorter and aggressive gearing. The 150 lbs weight difference means nothing.

  • yes it should be like that.. Thanks for details mate ;)

  • 135i is the moral winner.

  • @SpeedKlz add 300$ mod to the 135i = rape m3's all day lol. 135i's can get to the low 11's with slicks and a small chip on 91 octane. im sure i can reach the 10's if it had race gas and a good tune.

  • @Undertakerrrrr twin turbo is only the aspiration engine , the hp and the ratio hp/weight are the importants things . M3 420 hp 135 i 306 hp....

    when the M3 is at 3800 rpm, it already has more power than the 135 i at 7000 rpm , so.....

  • yeah u r right mate..

  • @Undertakerrrrr i think you disagree with me, but i tried to explain why the M3 had better perfs , no offense bro .

  • @Trystelune

    no no i understand it mate,u re correct. I m also an M3 lover and when i watched it first,i couldnt believe my eyes and i thought its because of twin turbo but u said it doesnt,its just because the driver is fool :) i understand thank u bro ;)

  • This is just another perfect example why these people shouldnt test cars!! The M3 has 120hp more and they couldnt even beat a 300hp car! They should stick to testing jap cars

  • @DONNYBOYY28

    Thats because horsepower doesn't mean anything in terms of acceleration. It is just energy per unit of time. Torque is the force, both develops the same amount (400Nm). There are ofc also other factors to take into account like gear ratios, losses in the transmission, the torque/power curves etc...

  • bullshit

  • tell you what , i love my bmw's but i fukn hate bmw for going fi, you traitors ! imagine having the m cars being annoyed by so called lesser bmw's all over your ass, i mean what the fuk are bmw all about nowadays, the wankers ....really what is the point of having an m car now is there really any major point, the whole point in the past was a car that kicked ass, but now they just dont and i dont give a shite what anyone says cos i have one !!!

  • the M3 need to be launched correctly to beat the 135i, since there is more usable power in the turbo 135i coming out of the start. since the m3 dude bogged the car or whatever he couldn't catch the 135 by the quarter. however i bet the trap speed was a couple mph higher in the m3 due to higher horsepower

  • Best Motoring has some great track racers, but they s*ck monkey balls in drag racing and produce some of the most inconsistent results imaginable.

    The idi*t in the M3 could not drive for sh*t! The M3 is a full second faster than the 135 and runs mid-12s (12.5 - 12.6).

  • M3 driver is noob

  • Lolz  the M3 is a mid 12 sec car stock, the 1 srs is not.

  • No way the M3 lost to the 135i. As good as it it is, the M3 beats it.

  • Who really cares... I MEAN REALLY!!!

    Both Nice cars, and stupid to compare....

    Id take both thanks!

  • wtf

  • 135i is a pussy car.

  • i drive a M3 D C T psshhh i would own that 135

  • with some software the 135 will own an M3 in a straight line!

  • hell yeah i fear those new 1 series cause i am afraid they are all tuned lol

  • Agreed, I don't know how you lose with a M3 v. 135i. Bigger tires, only about 200 lbs heavier and the M has much more aggressive gearing. He should have had him by a second after 1/4 mile. On the track, I destroy 135i's with my M3

  • torque of the turbos is one factor..

    the other is the KGs

    and the other is that in this video the second gear of the m3 wasnt perfectly changed..(not shown in this video, but i have the complete one) and dont underestimate the 135 engine..max hp is not everything

  • @kasapomashero hp is still more important than the torque when it comes about accelerations , no ?

    and thanks for explaining the missed second gear thing, it could be an answer to the akward result of this match .

  • jesus, the M3 driver is a kid!! and he didn't shift at good RPM's

  • that's not true...need eye glasses man?

  • lol this video is so stupid.. the M3 is manual no wonder it lost and if u look the guy shifting in the M3 isint even take the M3 to the max he shifted at 7000 RPMish u can acually shift the M3 at 8500 RPM LOL

  • not true at all

  • your a fucking idiot that is the 135 that shifts at 7k (redline) not the m3 which you can see is shifting at 8.5k..... you fail

  • lol sure you do i own a 12 second cobalt and a low 11 second 1964.5 mustang come get some pussy

  • lol WITH MY CAR CAN BUY BOTH YOUR CARS AND STILL HAVE MONEY LEFT OVER FOR RIMS . HAHAHA AMERICAN CARS SUCK COCK JUST LIKE YOU lol

  • A chipped 135i is slower than an m3? haha ah I dont think so. A 135i with Vishnu V3, can do mid to low 12 second 1/4s with nothing else... chuck on an intake , and downpipes and it will do very low 12s.. high 11s with Drag Radials... an M3 for the most part will do somewhere between 12.8 and 13.2 seconds over the 1/4 mile... it will dyno 400bhp and over 400lbs-ft at the rear wheels.

  • maybe the race was done in high altitude... m3 loses much more than the 135 being turbo

  • bollox that japanese homos cant drive for shit a chipped 135 is still slightly slower than the e92 m3. best motoring is quite well know for having dodgy comparisions

  • The weight difference is 100 Kg, and the power difference is 114 BHP, more than 1 Hp per Kg, and plus the M3's engine wich is the most advanced engine in the world...and the M Diffential if you believe this bullshit, you're off...

  • i think the new 335 is actually a twin turbo engine

  • it is

  • 13.3 in a new m3 is horrible driving

  • ok, re-read what i said, and then answer this question...

    did i say it was?

  • i've never seen more bull shit in my life. this video is an absolute joke

  • this video is not joke ... 135i is much lighhter and win at SMALL DISTANCE !!!

  • regardless of which is lighter and quicker, m3 is just a better made car period. 135i has a whole half an inch of wasted interior where there's just nothing. it's a car made for people who can't afford a well made car, that will enable them to say they can get to 0-60 faster then some others. it's pathetic

  • I think the pathetic guy is you. A 135i isn't a well made car? I would like to know what do you have in your garage...or should I say sleeping in the street ?

  • an M3 is in my garage. two door space gray with tinted windows. If you want a few pics i'll send you some

  • rofl pics fail post vids or you are lying..... you prob have a slow as shit last gen m3 that would get smoked by a new 335 or 135 lol

  • lol, stop commenting all over this page and mind your own shit faggot, if it matters so much to you message me and i'll send you a video. and get that shitty cobalt off your page too btw

  • still waiting for the message

  • @scotty4163 i didn't even see that til now, and i only post vids of the cobalt cause the mustang doesn't do any street racing, and i haven't had her to the track in a while, and i rarely drive her, you send me vids i'll send you pics if you wanna see her

  • @scotty4163 btw i was prob hammered that night i seem to post shit after i get back from the club, you really should see pics of my mustang.... it's a pretty little m3 color ;) no jokes

  • @widowedeight yeh, man, i haven't been on youtube for a while so this is late, i'm not real savey with gettin videos on youtube and such but i'll try one of these days, hit me up with some pics tho once i get you a vid, btw do you race it at all like up in the poconos cuz i think they're a few races in october

  • im surprised they didnt make both these cars look extra slow.

  • The guys at Best Motoring seem to have a really hard time with high power rear wheel drive cars.

    Their drag results very rarely show the true performance of the car they are driving.

  • YEA, i noticed the same thing.

  • lol

  • The 135i has some serious speed, but the M3 would kill it in a longer drag.

  • true...very true!!! the 135 looks f.n ugly anyway

  • I am pretty sure the 135i is pretty close to the Newest m3 in performance. I hear they are going to produce a real M version of the 135i. They won't call it the M1 but it will be knowing as the Tii, I could see it being close to 400 hp.

  • yah I saw that thing it will prolly be pretty badass

  • power to weight ratio, holy shit. Cant wait to get my hands one of those to tune it

  • Wow. Bad comments by some.

    High altitude? Probably was a factor being that this show was shot in Japan. In some areas, I can see where the 135i may be a quicker car, like if you lived in Denver. If this were a race around a road course, even at high altitude, I'm sure the outcome would be much, much different.

  • give a real car to a jap and he will get confused.... he made the m3 look a lot slower than it really is...

  • Drift Gurl considering you provide no fact or logic in your idiotic arguement, who are you to call some stupid or a fan boy. The closest youve probably ever come to these cars peering through the window of one on the street... and I was wondering all this time why there were nose and hand marks on my cars window...

  • A Nsx out running an M6? are you stupid, the M6 has a quicker terminal speed over a standing km and standing mile than a lamborghini Gallardo ( it does 0-250km/h in about 22 secs... same time it takes to do a standing km). a 13.25 second pass for an e92 M3 is piddlingly shit... the driver is an ex lemans winner? I highly doubt it... and if so he should be Road and track did a 12.5 @ 114.8 mph in the M3 vs 13.3-13.4 @ 107mph in a 135i... these cars are not even close.

  • Drift Gurl,

    The only one who knows nothing is you... you can barely speak English. An E92 is atleast half a second quicker than a 135i through the 1/4 mile. In M-Dynamic mode the cars diff and TC aid make full bore launches easy and controlled. Being an owner of both 335i v2 vishnu, and an e92 m3 ( The V2 does a 12.75 1/4 vs my best time of 12.60 in the m3) I think I know a thing or two. Perhaps you should check out M5boards rolling runs on here, the m3 pummells the 135 from 30-155mph (20 cl)

  • il pilota dell'm3 parte anche qualche centesimo di secondo più tardi.

  • The driver on the M3 is a winner of 2004 Le Mans... Just for a reference.

  • What a moron,

    M3s run a mid to high 12 at 112-115mph, vs a 135i low 13 @ 107-108mph... the fact that the 135i outlaunched the M3 shows the driver is rubbish and inexperienced. (M3 has an LSD and technology to aid it in the launch)

  • you are stupid. lsd aid the launch of the m3? man you are pathetic. You do not know anything about car fuking fanboy. For your information M3 as a lot of wheelspins.

  • the driver of the m3 didn't use the m-dynamic-mode. poor driver and wrong settings ;)

  • Agree 100% abou poor driver.

  • stfu DriftGurl, u dont know fuck all

  • go back to school an play with your friends!

  • For your information a nsx type r with 300 horsepower out run a m6. Of course the 135i with twinsturbo will smoke a m3. You just don't know anything about car. Please if you don't know anything about car stfu.... You making yourself look bad fanboy.

  • LOL!!!! twinsturbo!? you a fucking moron! YOU KNOW SO MUCH ABOUT CAR!! 2 turbos?? that means it should be faster than no turbos!...bitch

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more