Modern Marvels: World Trade Center Part 5 (HQ)

[BillOralRushRimjob]

I find it funny how some truthers say HURR DURR THE CORE JUST COLLAPSES WITH THE WHOLE BUILDING HOW CAN THAT HAPPEN, IF IT PANCAKED NATURALLY THE CORE WOULD REMAIN....

...when the WTC towers had no structural core.

[seahorseruler]

1:49 is a really nice picture of the building

[athabascka]

2:11 he jinxed it

[bongnavaro24]

IF THIS IS WHAT GONNA HAPPEN IN OUR LIFE I HOPE WE WERE NEVER BORN

[david2001able]

ok i know this is not in the subject but... why are they building the wtc again..? i mean thats like giving a killer a gun and sayin shot me...

[domamania]

wow i cant belive he said that. the immense heat from jet fuel took down the towers, never in history have towers were brought down from jet fuel, i mean jet fuel that 4/5 kerosine, i mean propaine burnes hotter and yes it does not melt 8 of my gas stoves that my tenants and the cook for 5 and 6 hours strait. what a joke, before any of us should belive them do your own research and study the science for your selves and not these baffons.

[DevonteThatDon]

i wish the towers were still up so i could visit it for the 1st time :(

[SlackerSlayer]

I bet they will not say in the following segments that the 1993 bombing was an FBI job. Everyone that had a hand in covering up their involvement to follow, also did their part to cover the 2001 crimes as well, and rewarded hansomly for their work. Two were later named to head the DHS.

[BowProStudios]

The whole "plane resistive" thing was a major miscalculation. The World Trade Center's design made it more likely to collapse from plane impacts than other buildings not less.

[terryk1233]

@BowProStudios This is very true. Most conspiracy theorists that subscribe to the controlled demolition theory fail to realize that the entire building was designed to have massive open floor plans. So as soon as the tops of the towers fell just one story the floors below gave absolutely no resistance Leading to a total collapse.

[redneckbob109]

2:05 is very weird how that was mentioned. freaked me out

[kantk2008]

2:05

Wow. This whole documentary is just inviting trouble. From how much they hype the Towers as the symbol of America and being revolutionary to even saying how strong it is and surviving multiple plane crashes.

I bet the terrorists were thinking 'Let's see if it's true, shall we?'

[dynomitekiller]

propoganda begins around 7:26

[lazix]

way to temp fate....

[PlayboyChad23]

I'm not fuckin' spam whoever in the fuck flagged my comment as spam...all i said is to watch a certain damn documentary to someone wtf...

[IExposeMormonism]

When we hear the truth at minute 2:30 we must then ask what happened? A 707 and a 767 aren't that different. 707 is faster and has almost the gvw of a 767. They are both 13ft tall. Hollow Aluminum. The wings should snap of on impact and the plane explode on impact. We see None of that. We see a poof and a "plane" enters seamlessly wing tips edges tail and all, It isn't a Boeing. It explodes only once fully inside the WTC. So, what hit the WTC and what made it fall? Not kerosene.

[Jah044445]

@IExposeMormonism It was an airliner, you can see it in broad day light in every video. But no, the plane did not make it fall, but the fact that there were fires burning that no one could put out, it weakened the supports causing them to give out, causing the top of the building to drop, which would bring down the rest of it.

[IExposeMormonism]

@Jah044445 Well, I'll be darned. I've looked at thousands of plane crashes and thousand of WTC videos and yes, it does Look like a 767. But when was the last time you saw plane wings tips and edges melt seamlessly through steel and concrete/steel floors. 6 floors of it. Each floor=4000tons. the 767=140 tons. The WTC was designed to take over 13,000 tons of load, more than 140! And not an iota of office furniture was found and no concrete chunks exist. Check it out. Nothing is left

[saveus2132]

@IExposeMormonism I see what you mean but wouldn't it be possible for the furniture to burn up and turn into ash?

[IExposeMormonism]

@saveus2132 No office furniture or any office contents were recovered intact. In 3 years I recently found a piece of concrete over 100 lbs. 220 acres of concrete is missing and all the office contents are missing. All of it. No glass! a large piece is a few inches! Type in Fireman witness, etc.

[pocomedy]

@IExposeMormonism it was designed for for a plane traveling at less then 200mph and certainly they probably didn't even think people would actually ram to jets at full speed into it. You have to remember that terrorism was not a big thought on any ones mind back then.

[EdwardRommel]

@IExposeMormonism

"make the skin much stronger ..so you wouldn't need internal columns"..that's why you can't compare the Empire State Building to the WTC...totally different designs.

[IExposeMormonism]

@EdwardRommel The WTC is far ahead of the ESB. And the WTC was designed to take a 13,000 ton inpact. The so called Boeing was not going to take down 110 acres of steel and concrete. 500,000 tons. We've been had

[EdwardRommel]

@IExposeMormonism

If the building was so strong...then how did the plane go into the building?...????

Why didn't the plane bounce off the building?

The plane went INTO the building...and the explosion came out of the other side...that's why plane parts landed on the street below...like the engines, wheels,etc.

[IExposeMormonism]

@EdwardRommel watch some plane crashes. I made a play list of plane crashes. The 911-WTC Boeing's are unique. The plane moves a good 50 feet inside the WTC and Then explodes. And the idea of wing tips and edges, tail, and body all entering intact is absurd. We know this. But I understand. I have friends with phd's who wont even look at the issue and /or just quote the Nova documentaries, etc

[eyreland]

It's a real shame the post 2001 re-issue censored the part about the aircraft collision durability. It's pointless as all 'skyscrapers' have had this durability condition since the 1940s -- via the gift of the Empire State Building.

[garycalgary]

now that is an arrogantly egotistical thing to say that several jetliners could have crashed into the towers.

nothing man made is infallible.

[Trevor5142]

Wow! It looks just like 9/11!

[rockbottom56]

How Ironic.

[nelsxxxpm]

And to think this is from a VHS tape. So there is room for improvement.

[genghis6l99]

thank you again. this one is great. best copy i have seen.