I want my ten minutes back. That was the most anticlimactic video I have ever seen, and for all the money and time you spent, you still managed to produce shots at the same level as most of the green as grass photographers in my high school photography class.
Sell those lenses and go take a few classes on how to correctly expose your subject.
Hi guy. Thank you for viewing this video. I know this video made you feel uncomfortable, but please ignore it. At first, this video is made for own entertainment purposes only. It is not created by a professional videographer. You will not also learn any bird shooting lesson from the video. So, please ignore this video if you do not like it. Tq.
Hmmmmmmm im not david bailey as im just a noob here and not long been doing this kind of stuff ! but i must say you got some neat gear but end result photos did not do justice for the Gear you had? was you just test shooting or.......? but hey i have no right to say their poor as im new but with what you are using i thought the photos taken would have been a lot shaper ? Sorry but only just saying !!!!
That's a lot of top notch equipment, and yet, quite frankly, the shot's you've posted at the end of the video are not particularly great. I don't care if you shoot digital or film, or if you're carrying 20 pounds of gear around a park, at the end what counts are the pictures you make, and these ones here are weak.
@albanMK1 Those are good pictures you have to remember that maybe the video is not of HD resolution so you cant say its a bad photo with out seeing the RAW image
@Huffdev Common now, get serious. Look at those pictures, do you really think that if this guy showed the 21 megapixel raw file, the pictures will look any better? It's not about the pics resolution, or if the video is in hd or standard def. I really think you are missing the point behind my first comment. Just as all the pro equipment in the world won't magically give you a great pic, neither does a high def file make these particular pics any better.
@albanMK1 I wasnt really talking about the resolution...... i meant like ok those have life in the photo! it not the greatest. But its not a bird diving down and catching a worm in midair. You gotta look at the photo like that one is singing and has a gesturue and a emotion to it. Idk maybe i just see it differently then you do.
@Huffdev if the pictures are at raw 21 pix... if they are smaller they would be really tact sharp... to me they looked cropped and slightly out of focus... got better results with a 100-400 and 2x extender (and thats a soft image) the 100-400 on its own is good though... that 600/800 he has there should be perfect .. as its not a zoom lens the images must be cropped! shutter speed is to low as well.. needs to be around 1/2000 for a perfect moving moment!
@albanMK1 It's not the camera it's the man behind it as they say. Having said that he can't post a raw image or even a large jpeg file on here and that could contribute to the low quality. As far as the photography itself goes, it looks an awful lot like most bird photographers work to me - birds on branches!
I'm suprised you don't have robot arms controlling the cameras. Then you could just sit back and let the camera take to photo it'self. How about going handheld and actually get in the forrest, on your stomach and crawl. At least then when you got a good shot it would feel like you have accomplished something.
@Skyliner33gtst does every wildlife photoshoot has to be commando style and had to be dirty and handheld? Or do you have no fkin idea and just conjure out an imaginary scenario of how "hardcore" bird photography should be? If I ain't pro (means i pay for my own gear and I aint shooting for an assignment), I aint gonna be fkin crawling around with that 500mm. unless RICH kids like yourself think otherwise. fkin noobs who neg comment on every video and think they know the world from their couch
"...does every wildlife photoshoot has to be commando style and had to be dirty and handheld? ..."
No, it doesen't has to be, but most of the time it is! :D If you want just get some bird on a picture, you can shoot like this guys do it. But if you want outstanding, award vinning pictures, most of the time you must have to get dirty, or muddy or wet. Photography is more than just get a subject in the frame!
@attilakegyes Why are you so anal? Do you think every "bird/widlife" photographer is competing with you and you have the urge to tell them that they aren't as pro as you and arent as entusiastic as you and arent as "get-down-and-dirty" as you? What statistics shows you that you HAVE to get dirty or muddy or wet? That is just idiotic way to handle yourself. Search "wildlife photography" in youtube. I dont fkin see people digging their face in mud. You must be making that shit up.
I think you have no idea what is the photography all about. Just getting a subject in a frame is NOT PHOTOGRAPHY! It is just a snapshot. I have a photo of a swan swimming in a morning lights. One side of the swan got orange lights, on the otehr side is still bluish. The swan is surrounded by a morning mist above the water. The angle of wiev are so low my camera was just above the water. Can you do a picture like this if you go out at noon, and you don't wade in a water?
@Skyliner33gtst its a fkin 800mm. wired shutter release helps reduce vibration hence getting sharpness. YOU CANT crawl with that gear. and do a "bird photography" on youtube and see how its done, you dont handheld and crawl around for 8 hours with that gear and unless u havent got a fkin clue. Idiot.
What are these guys doing? Wealthy amateurs with pro gear!
What I see, this guy have no idea about photography so he need exposure bracketing. He can't measure the lights, he can't determing the exposure, so he just shoot hundreds of pictures in a hope some of them accidentaly came out usable, which still need some PS manipulations.
This kind of amatuer "picture manufacturers" killing the photography.
You think I'm jealous? For what? The pictures they got? I got betters! Way betters! For theirs equipment? Not at all! I shoot with pro film camera with 800mm lens. if I do flash photography I do with 3-4 remote flas units for better illuminations. I'm not chasing birds trought public parks. I prepair for the shot! I do REAL wildlife photograhy, not just walking in parks with my camera, and hoping something accidentally get front of me.
@attilakegyes and does everyone has to operate just like you do? Just because you use a newspaper to wipe your ass, that doesnt mean that the guy using a 3 ply toilet roll is doing anything wrong.
As I wrote, the photography is not just getting a subject in a frame! The photography is all about lights, and the best lights are not the strong daylights! You can make snapshots, at daylight, but the real good photos are taken at the morning or evening hours, not at noon in a local park. Angle of view alos important. The best is the eye level of the subject! If you not wade in a water, or lay down on a ground or climb on a tree, you'll don't get the best angle of view.
@attilakegyes and last but not least, i see why you are so envy of some casual photographer gear. Apparently you didn't know that there are some good tripods with jizzmatic cetercolumns that can tilt in any crazy angles you want and legs that can spread from 100mm from groundlevel to 7ft in height and and and... oo those latest with tilt-able liveview!! but i guess new gears are jsut not pro, we just had to stick with films and old cameras and dig our face in mud to prove that we are better.
I see you have no clue about tripods either! My telephoto lens is 7,10Kg (15,65lb) my camera is 1,53Kg (3,37lb)
You can't put a gear like this on any tripod with crazy center column. You need a rigid tripod! Most of the pro not use any center column, make the tripod more steady. But my experience is you can use center column if you have a really strong tripod. That's why I use one of the strongest Gitzo tripod. 99% of my pics taken from tripod.
When I bought my Gitzo 1548 tripod I ordered it's "Giant" version wich max height was more than 7ft, just to see how steady it is and worth it to buy or not. But I did send it back. In the full height it wasnt enough steady for the heavy telephoto lens. For ground level pics you need bean bag, groundpod, or normal tripod with upside down center column! If you spread the legs, the strongest tripod is become week and elastic. It is never worked for me, so I not recommended.
@attilakegyes Well for once I hope u can read your own post. It seems that every post you are making statement how good of a photographer you are and how the rest needs to follow your footsteps to be good.
Second of all, err seems i never said I was a pro bird photographer. But your pompous arrogance seems to sux everything else into your own dig-your-face-inmud-im-pro-and-you-are-not world.
Everyone can push the shutter realese button! To do that, not need a talent a clue, a brain! Only need a finger!
Everyone can take a snapshot, that is not a big deal, you just have to push the sr button.
Try to take a picture of waterflow which is middle of a swamp, at morning lights, from an eye level of the bird, with the right background, and right driections of the lights, without getting wet or muddy! This is what I call a wildlife photography!
@attilakegyes Honestly, I think you just come up with this scenario from watching natgeo. I have said earlier if you do a search on youtube "wildlife photography" or "bird photography" I dont see alot of people getting dirty. And most do setup camps to campout for a good shot. Yes there ARE moments when getting your feet wet is neccessary because that moment required you to do so, but its NOT a MUST. Furthermore, there are some casual photographers out there, who are you to stop them?
If you want to know what is a real wildlife photography you should not search you tube for clue! But this is show me you have no personal experience at all, you just search the Net! I have personal experience.
Otherwise i did'nt come up with the that scenario from watching Nat. Geo. That is description of a few of my pictures! I can't put a link in the comment but you can find me on Flickr under the name of "Csoro" and you can see a short vid some of my pics here on Youtube.
@attilakegyes its not exposure bracketing idiot. Dont trudge on grounds which you have no clue yourself. Its burst shots. When you get into wildlife, animals dont exactly pose for you. When you get your subject in focused and ready to trigger, you do burst shots. The burst frames will get a few shots in a short moment. For birds that are flying, it means that you may have some shots where their wings are covering their head. For others like tigers it means getting that 1 angle that shows mood.
I do wildlife photogrpahy for more than 12 years! And not with digital which was design for clueless idiots! I do photography with film camera where you have to know what are you doing!
Otherwise you are right, for action shot you may need continuous shooting, but chek the pictures on the end of the video! Non of them action shot! So they are did use exposure bracketing, getting some acceptable exposure! 99% of digital shooters use it, for replace the clue of light metering.
why this guy uploading these worst videos please some go tell this guy he is not a photographer and wild birds photographer hehehehe asshole
scorpio9156 2 weeks ago
idiots
kodamarciano 2 weeks ago
Typical Singaporean. Has all the equipment, but doesn't know how to use it.
NatureNTech 4 weeks ago 2
what tripod do you use?
tommyjones1978 1 month ago
underexposed shoots u sucked hell man!!!!!
ivfmcclove 1 month ago
I want my ten minutes back. That was the most anticlimactic video I have ever seen, and for all the money and time you spent, you still managed to produce shots at the same level as most of the green as grass photographers in my high school photography class.
Sell those lenses and go take a few classes on how to correctly expose your subject.
CameraPPL 1 month ago
Hi guy. Thank you for viewing this video. I know this video made you feel uncomfortable, but please ignore it. At first, this video is made for own entertainment purposes only. It is not created by a professional videographer. You will not also learn any bird shooting lesson from the video. So, please ignore this video if you do not like it. Tq.
kboonng 2 months ago
this guy is a joke, his pics are weak, kinda wasted my time here. Or maybe i have expected too much from a "wannabe" bird photographer.
OscaR1GSX 2 months ago
It is amazing how many people operating with little budget zoom lenses on D40s could outshoot some of the people with D3s and big telephotos.
MrFloppywaffles 2 months ago
try to find a book name "guide" or "how to"
mblegedez2196 2 months ago
Canon sucks dude, those pics are so damn ugly...
skidrowdie 2 months ago
Motordrive all the shots! White balance is way off on your shots,
MRpeanut222 2 months ago
great video skills....not much photography...iv done much better stuff with less gear..and even handheld!.
but i wouldn't judge just from 4mins video
halfraid 3 months ago
the photos they took look like they weren't even edited. They were all plain and dull looking and some of them looked plain out of focus.
habadashery2009 3 months ago
boring
hobateetomambo 3 months ago
The flash makes everything flat and boring to be quite frank.
Goodbadbritish 3 months ago
Hmmmmmmm im not david bailey as im just a noob here and not long been doing this kind of stuff ! but i must say you got some neat gear but end result photos did not do justice for the Gear you had? was you just test shooting or.......? but hey i have no right to say their poor as im new but with what you are using i thought the photos taken would have been a lot shaper ? Sorry but only just saying !!!!
MadStylezuk 3 months ago
snoozefest
twentymoreyears 3 months ago
i have definitely seen and taken better pictures
chocolatteking 3 months ago
Spray and pray....
theokikphotography 4 months ago
I have more birds in my garden.
wwilze 4 months ago 2
ei..how come joo liang no shoot? see oni ah? can tahan mer??!! hahha..
TJ213101 4 months ago
I agree with Alban.. and also you should be looking at Tom Uhlman video on youtube. he does way better job for ordinary equipment.
salimant 4 months ago
photos are not bad, but I think they would be better if you tweak little bit white balance. cheers
ortodox989 4 months ago
I totally agree with alban. Reall disappointed at the end. I've gotten better pics without flash, with a 70-200 out my window!!
YIMMA996TT 5 months ago 16
That's a lot of top notch equipment, and yet, quite frankly, the shot's you've posted at the end of the video are not particularly great. I don't care if you shoot digital or film, or if you're carrying 20 pounds of gear around a park, at the end what counts are the pictures you make, and these ones here are weak.
albanMK1 5 months ago 29
@albanMK1 Those are good pictures you have to remember that maybe the video is not of HD resolution so you cant say its a bad photo with out seeing the RAW image
Huffdev 5 months ago
@Huffdev Common now, get serious. Look at those pictures, do you really think that if this guy showed the 21 megapixel raw file, the pictures will look any better? It's not about the pics resolution, or if the video is in hd or standard def. I really think you are missing the point behind my first comment. Just as all the pro equipment in the world won't magically give you a great pic, neither does a high def file make these particular pics any better.
albanMK1 5 months ago
@albanMK1 I wasnt really talking about the resolution...... i meant like ok those have life in the photo! it not the greatest. But its not a bird diving down and catching a worm in midair. You gotta look at the photo like that one is singing and has a gesturue and a emotion to it. Idk maybe i just see it differently then you do.
Huffdev 5 months ago
@Huffdev if the pictures are at raw 21 pix... if they are smaller they would be really tact sharp... to me they looked cropped and slightly out of focus... got better results with a 100-400 and 2x extender (and thats a soft image) the 100-400 on its own is good though... that 600/800 he has there should be perfect .. as its not a zoom lens the images must be cropped! shutter speed is to low as well.. needs to be around 1/2000 for a perfect moving moment!
jammapcb 4 months ago
@albanMK1 I agree but I visited their website and their are some quality ones on there. check them out!
magicpure959 4 months ago
@albanMK1 Shows how hard it is I guess.
AntiIgnorantDimwit 1 month ago
@albanMK1 It's not the camera it's the man behind it as they say. Having said that he can't post a raw image or even a large jpeg file on here and that could contribute to the low quality. As far as the photography itself goes, it looks an awful lot like most bird photographers work to me - birds on branches!
chas4551 1 month ago
If i were them, I`d shoot large nice animals or moon and stars. Birds r boooring. Nice video though. Shows how different people are.
111nuthead 6 months ago
NICE HUNT,CONGRATULATIONS!!!
Regards from Spain
Mike.-
anunnaki7777 7 months ago
Yeah Canon All The Way..
urbanfibua 7 months ago
Photo is very beautiful. But to transport such a gun is a little complicated :-)
costiniucmircea 7 months ago
why have the camouflaged camera, brown top then bright white trousers o.0??
OrpheusonRS 9 months ago
@OrpheusonRS
It's a playground, the birds are pretty used to people. If you're in the bush, the camo becomes more useful.
tartredarrow 9 months ago
his camera looks like a freakin telescope :O
CellphoneTL 10 months ago
aah. internet fight..
bry4n3 1 year ago
what is the dramatic piece of music called?
sainks 1 year ago
what is the dramatic piece of music called?
sainks 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All the gear but no idea!
quickshooter100 1 year ago
I'm suprised you don't have robot arms controlling the cameras. Then you could just sit back and let the camera take to photo it'self. How about going handheld and actually get in the forrest, on your stomach and crawl. At least then when you got a good shot it would feel like you have accomplished something.
Skyliner33gtst 1 year ago
@Skyliner33gtst Yep so true, just the way i do it,creeping around the woods with my 500mm:O)
quickshooter100 1 year ago
@Skyliner33gtst does every wildlife photoshoot has to be commando style and had to be dirty and handheld? Or do you have no fkin idea and just conjure out an imaginary scenario of how "hardcore" bird photography should be? If I ain't pro (means i pay for my own gear and I aint shooting for an assignment), I aint gonna be fkin crawling around with that 500mm. unless RICH kids like yourself think otherwise. fkin noobs who neg comment on every video and think they know the world from their couch
djshadowpain 1 year ago
@djshadowpain
"...does every wildlife photoshoot has to be commando style and had to be dirty and handheld? ..."
No, it doesen't has to be, but most of the time it is! :D If you want just get some bird on a picture, you can shoot like this guys do it. But if you want outstanding, award vinning pictures, most of the time you must have to get dirty, or muddy or wet. Photography is more than just get a subject in the frame!
attilakegyes 1 year ago
@attilakegyes Why are you so anal? Do you think every "bird/widlife" photographer is competing with you and you have the urge to tell them that they aren't as pro as you and arent as entusiastic as you and arent as "get-down-and-dirty" as you? What statistics shows you that you HAVE to get dirty or muddy or wet? That is just idiotic way to handle yourself. Search "wildlife photography" in youtube. I dont fkin see people digging their face in mud. You must be making that shit up.
djshadowpain 1 year ago
@djshadowpain
I think you have no idea what is the photography all about. Just getting a subject in a frame is NOT PHOTOGRAPHY! It is just a snapshot. I have a photo of a swan swimming in a morning lights. One side of the swan got orange lights, on the otehr side is still bluish. The swan is surrounded by a morning mist above the water. The angle of wiev are so low my camera was just above the water. Can you do a picture like this if you go out at noon, and you don't wade in a water?
attilakegyes 1 year ago
@Skyliner33gtst its a fkin 800mm. wired shutter release helps reduce vibration hence getting sharpness. YOU CANT crawl with that gear. and do a "bird photography" on youtube and see how its done, you dont handheld and crawl around for 8 hours with that gear and unless u havent got a fkin clue. Idiot.
djshadowpain 1 year ago
@djshadowpain
There is no 800mm lens on this video!
One of the guy shoot with a Canon 600mm, the other shoot with a Nikon 600mm lens.
attilakegyes 1 year ago
What are these guys doing? Wealthy amateurs with pro gear!
What I see, this guy have no idea about photography so he need exposure bracketing. He can't measure the lights, he can't determing the exposure, so he just shoot hundreds of pictures in a hope some of them accidentaly came out usable, which still need some PS manipulations.
This kind of amatuer "picture manufacturers" killing the photography.
attilakegyes 1 year ago
@attilakegyes Yes i do agree!
quickshooter100 1 year ago
@attilakegyes i smell penis envy :P
djshadowpain 1 year ago
@djshadowpain
You think I'm jealous? For what? The pictures they got? I got betters! Way betters! For theirs equipment? Not at all! I shoot with pro film camera with 800mm lens. if I do flash photography I do with 3-4 remote flas units for better illuminations. I'm not chasing birds trought public parks. I prepair for the shot! I do REAL wildlife photograhy, not just walking in parks with my camera, and hoping something accidentally get front of me.
attilakegyes 1 year ago
@attilakegyes and does everyone has to operate just like you do? Just because you use a newspaper to wipe your ass, that doesnt mean that the guy using a 3 ply toilet roll is doing anything wrong.
djshadowpain 1 year ago
@djshadowpain
As I wrote, the photography is not just getting a subject in a frame! The photography is all about lights, and the best lights are not the strong daylights! You can make snapshots, at daylight, but the real good photos are taken at the morning or evening hours, not at noon in a local park. Angle of view alos important. The best is the eye level of the subject! If you not wade in a water, or lay down on a ground or climb on a tree, you'll don't get the best angle of view.
attilakegyes 1 year ago
@attilakegyes and last but not least, i see why you are so envy of some casual photographer gear. Apparently you didn't know that there are some good tripods with jizzmatic cetercolumns that can tilt in any crazy angles you want and legs that can spread from 100mm from groundlevel to 7ft in height and and and... oo those latest with tilt-able liveview!! but i guess new gears are jsut not pro, we just had to stick with films and old cameras and dig our face in mud to prove that we are better.
djshadowpain 1 year ago
@djshadowpain
I see you have no clue about tripods either! My telephoto lens is 7,10Kg (15,65lb) my camera is 1,53Kg (3,37lb)
You can't put a gear like this on any tripod with crazy center column. You need a rigid tripod! Most of the pro not use any center column, make the tripod more steady. But my experience is you can use center column if you have a really strong tripod. That's why I use one of the strongest Gitzo tripod. 99% of my pics taken from tripod.
Chek my vid about my photogear.
attilakegyes 1 year ago
@djshadowpain
When I bought my Gitzo 1548 tripod I ordered it's "Giant" version wich max height was more than 7ft, just to see how steady it is and worth it to buy or not. But I did send it back. In the full height it wasnt enough steady for the heavy telephoto lens. For ground level pics you need bean bag, groundpod, or normal tripod with upside down center column! If you spread the legs, the strongest tripod is become week and elastic. It is never worked for me, so I not recommended.
attilakegyes 1 year ago
@attilakegyes Well for once I hope u can read your own post. It seems that every post you are making statement how good of a photographer you are and how the rest needs to follow your footsteps to be good.
Second of all, err seems i never said I was a pro bird photographer. But your pompous arrogance seems to sux everything else into your own dig-your-face-inmud-im-pro-and-you-are-not world.
djshadowpain 1 year ago
@djshadowpain
Hey man! You are tried to teach me about bird photography then about tripod, etc.
I just want you to know I have much more clue of the subject we talking about here.
No one have to follow my footsteps, but the real photographers do photography in a same way as I do anyway!
You have to recognize that, there is a photography, and photographers, and there are the mass who have camera and taking snap shots.
Just because you have a swimsuit it is not mean you became a swimmer!
attilakegyes 1 year ago
@attilakegyes
Dude, you don't shoot film just to scan it to digital. You shoot film if you want to blow it up to poster size prints.
tartredarrow 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@tartredarrow "... Dude, you don't shoot film just to scan it to digital. You shoot film if you want to blow it up to poster size prints. ..."
Or you want to project them in a size of about 3 x 2 meter
attilakegyes 9 months ago
@djshadowpain
Everyone can push the shutter realese button! To do that, not need a talent a clue, a brain! Only need a finger!
Everyone can take a snapshot, that is not a big deal, you just have to push the sr button.
Try to take a picture of waterflow which is middle of a swamp, at morning lights, from an eye level of the bird, with the right background, and right driections of the lights, without getting wet or muddy! This is what I call a wildlife photography!
attilakegyes 1 year ago
@attilakegyes Honestly, I think you just come up with this scenario from watching natgeo. I have said earlier if you do a search on youtube "wildlife photography" or "bird photography" I dont see alot of people getting dirty. And most do setup camps to campout for a good shot. Yes there ARE moments when getting your feet wet is neccessary because that moment required you to do so, but its NOT a MUST. Furthermore, there are some casual photographers out there, who are you to stop them?
djshadowpain 1 year ago
@djshadowpain
If you want to know what is a real wildlife photography you should not search you tube for clue! But this is show me you have no personal experience at all, you just search the Net! I have personal experience.
Otherwise i did'nt come up with the that scenario from watching Nat. Geo. That is description of a few of my pictures! I can't put a link in the comment but you can find me on Flickr under the name of "Csoro" and you can see a short vid some of my pics here on Youtube.
attilakegyes 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@djshadowpain
"... i smell penis envy :P..."
youtube.com/watch?v=BcRrNtwo0Ow
- It is some of my bird photos.
- I really have to be jealous for those pics what these guys got?
- I don't think so.
attilakegyes 1 year ago
@attilakegyes its not exposure bracketing idiot. Dont trudge on grounds which you have no clue yourself. Its burst shots. When you get into wildlife, animals dont exactly pose for you. When you get your subject in focused and ready to trigger, you do burst shots. The burst frames will get a few shots in a short moment. For birds that are flying, it means that you may have some shots where their wings are covering their head. For others like tigers it means getting that 1 angle that shows mood.
djshadowpain 1 year ago
@djshadowpain
I do wildlife photogrpahy for more than 12 years! And not with digital which was design for clueless idiots! I do photography with film camera where you have to know what are you doing!
Otherwise you are right, for action shot you may need continuous shooting, but chek the pictures on the end of the video! Non of them action shot! So they are did use exposure bracketing, getting some acceptable exposure! 99% of digital shooters use it, for replace the clue of light metering.
attilakegyes 1 year ago
5:18 did his camera break?
ashtonwentworth1 1 year ago
@ashtonwentworth1
I think it was the Flash Light.
kboonng 1 year ago
LOL guy with huge camera walking past kids playground
TotallyPhotography 1 year ago
i"m looking of this flash you put on top of the camera, what" nameof it?
where can i buy it?
thanks for your response
sharagim1 1 year ago
@sharagim1
its look like wired flash trigger not flash!! you can check
Phottix and Octopus brand wired or wireless trigger!!
Akinyamok 1 year ago
@sharagim1 I think it's a Canon speedlite with a diffuser attached ;)
JC040696 1 year ago
@JC040696 its not diffuser, its better beamer, its a tool which makes your more powerful. There is plastic lens which makes flash more powerful.
FinlandApollo 1 year ago
Mix those bird songs with a pop-up blind and the flycatchers will come to you in a much more desired pose and in 20% of the time...
gatotico 1 year ago
Nice one Kiah ..Enjoy it
mysephiroth74 1 year ago