Added: 5 years ago
From: muse2000
Views: 732,355
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (2,865)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This is the worst interpretation of this piece music I have ever heard out of all the interpretation that are on youtube.

  • 0:56 someone is laughing

  • Why dont play lang lang the original Liszt compisition, instead of this piece of sht weak try-out "improvization"? This clow is disgrace, in contrast the great Liszts composer compositions!

  • lang lang is a great pianist, but strangely expressive. 0:51 what a petifile

    yes i love this rhapsody!

  • Russian-American Rachmaninoff is the greatest pianist in history. His interpretation of the Liszt HR2 is sublime.

    Russian-American Horowitz is peerless (except for Rach and Gilels), his performance of his transcription of the HR2 is extraordinary.

    Lang Lang attempts the Horowitz version.

    Jung Lin's HR2 is extraordinary.

    Hamelin's HR2 has wonderful jazz-cadenza and a jazzy friska.

    Lisitsa's HR2 is a lesson on strictly playing to indicated tempo and dynamics.

    Maksim "attempts" the HR2 (?) - UGH

  • HISTORY IS FULL OF SCAM VERSIONS OF LISZT

    RUSSIAN Vladimir Horowitz made this simplified version where he cut the unplayable split-octave ending in half. He simplified other parts including the octaves just before the end and the chromatic chords. He lied to the press about the level of difficulty of his version.

    CHINESE Lang Lang copies the Russian scam of playing the easier version. He doesn't have to lie about the difficulty of the arrangement, because Horowitz did the lying for him.

  • @6347285

    Someone please kick this moron out...

  • EXAMPLES OF SCAM VERSIONS OF LISZT

    FRENCH Alfred Cortot rearranged the order of 400 notes at the end, so his hands wouldn't have to move in opposite directions. (Dichter was Polish, not French.)

    POLISH Ignacy Paderewski used the same European scam as the others to con people into thinking that he could play Liszt.

    AUSTRIAN Alfred Brendel used the same European scam on the ending, but he simplified other parts as well. (Example: he cut the 22 note scales and played 10 note arpeggios.)

  • EXAMPLES OF SIMPLIFIED LISZT ON RECORDINGS

    AUSTRAILIAN Leslie Howard rearranged the order of 400 notes at the end, so his hands wouldn't have to move in opposite directions.

    FRENCH Misha Dichter faked the split octaves the same way.

    RUSSIAN Sergi Rachmaninoff used the old "interpretation" scam where he played the ending quietly, clinging to the keys. It's like a director who can't make the shower scene in Hitchcocks' Psycho exciting, so he "interprets" it as boring to make it easier.

  • MORE EXAMPLES OF SCAM VERSIONS OF LISZT

    CZECHOLVOKIAN Josef Bulva rearranged the orded of 400 notes at the end, so his hands wouldn't have to execute the opposite direction movements Liszt wrote.

    ITALIAN Michelle Campanella changed the orded of the notes at the end the same as the other Europeans.

    HUNGARIAN Georges Cziffra faked the split octaves at the end on his second recording. On his first recording, he showed you why he had to fake. That one ends in an embarassing mess of mistakes.

  • Diese Interpretation ist schrecklich !! Das hat das Stück nicht verdient. Grauenhaft. ! Keiner bestreitet, daß Lang Lang ein begnadeter Pianist ist, aber hier wird auf Kosten von Showeffekten ein tolles Werk zerstört !!!

  • Technical he is perfect. Everyone is entitled to their view of his interpretation. But in my opinion he is the best thing since sliced bread!!

  • So much for this being one of the most fun piano pieces...

  • 02:55 she smoke like smoking weed

  • 918 People Known Classical Music, in especially this song...

  • Someday many years from now, in hell, there will be a concert of Lang Lang playing this piece, accompanied by Andre Rieu and his orchestra.

  • @DFDalton1962 And Maksim and his technodisco band

  • für alle leute die garkeine ahnung von klavier haben.............

  • Hey, @muse2000 , Why don't you put in the title "Lang Lang Version"?

  • george li is where its at for this piece

  • ovverated pianist

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • woo woo woo....what the hell is this???

  • technically impeccable but all that resembles a poor preformance in a third-class brothel

  • Liszt was a Genius

  • guys... maybe lang lang  just simply interprets this piece diferently... but personal, jung lins version is BOSS

  • what a tool

  • To everyone saying they dont like this interpretation, when you get as good as him then your entitled to judge him...

  • @ultracowking That's idiotic. Anyone with ears can judge a musician. That judgment may be in error if the critic doesn't understand the fundamentals of pianism or the aspects of the piece in question, but they're still entitled to their opinions.

    Lang takes a childish liberty with the tempi in this piece, focusing on showing off technical prowess instead of giving life to the half-serious, half- playful nature of this beautiful rhapsody. Very immature, not nearly as thoughtful as he should be.

  • Lang Lang....HAH

    Marc-Andre would play circles round this lil' guy.

  • For God's sake!!!! It's just too

    STUPID!

    :P

  • sounds like a speeded up jack n the box. just because you hit all the right notes doesn`t make it right,

    this is absolutely rubbish, no emotion, rubbish tempo. just trickery..... like all his renditions

    so over rated this guy, he massacres everything he plays. absolute dog mess

  • lang lang is just bad its like an a white person trying to be bettter than a black person at sports, it just doesn't work

  • Comment removed

  • Why is everyone so pre\judiced about Lang Lang ????? I saw him in the Sydney opera House last year playing the Rach 3 Concerto and he received a 10 minute standing ovation. Absolutlely nothing wrong with this HR 2 he is playing. Its at the right tempo and rich in expression and warm in tone. I give it 10/10

  • I love how Lang Lang can deceive millions and millions of deaf people in to believing he can actually play Liszt the way it suppose to be played. He's the master of practical jokes hahahaha!!!

  • Whats wrong.

  • it's Hungarian Rhapsody 2 made in china =))

  • @Onikznsk Unfounded comment, sorry! Lang Lang was trained at Curtiss, Philadelphia, PA, USA :-)))

  • I didn't know he was American, but it's certainly not that great.

  • one of the worst hungarian rh. no.2 i ever heard...sorry

  • @Will84ABA this is not the liszt original hungarian rh. no. 2, it's the arrangement by horowitz.

  • @Will84ABA second that... as much as I like Lang Lang this performance is not only an insult to Liszt's fantastic composition but also simply disrespectful to the people who came to hear that... -_-'

  • Comment removed

  • hear and look for YW1935...much better then this exentric one

  • I'm not too impressed with this interpretation. From a technical standpoint it's very well done, but he plays it so fast that parts of it just turn into noise, keeping the listener from enjoying the piece as it was meant to be played. Yes we realize you can play fast, but this isn't a race. Speed isn't everything. Emotion and dynamics are even more important.

  • i seriously think lang lang is overrated. no offense. he's good. but not good enough to be celebrated this much. like martha argerich, daniel pollack, Cziffa...people like that are incredibly good. but if you go up to a random person and ask them if they know these people. Nothing. But if you say Lang Lang; WOW. . . so i guess it's my opinion but ya...

  • ??? Lang Lang, it's about playing, not composing. Or that is a Liszt variation?

  • His interpretation of this is so poor. He plays way too fast and puts very little emotion into it... Maksim's is much better!

  • @9989126 Maksim is nothing but a lounge act, he is a very poor pianist - not in the same level as Lang Lang, Hamelin or Jung Lin!

  • A little too fast for my taste, but otherwise, it's a fine rendition. :)

  • Free notes of this piece you will find in :  FREEMUSICBOOKS . COM (there many notes for free!!!)

  • Unspeakably vile. 

  • The record business is covered by Billboard.

    Pianists covered by Billboard: Lang Lang, Richard Kastle, Vladimir Horowitz.

    Pianists NOT covered by Billboard: Marc Andre Hamelin, Alice Sara Ott, Denis Matsuev. Minor label releases and recordings that don't sell are not covered. Most pianists never make it to Billboard, because very few people buy classical CD's.

  • This is not a march nor an etude, this is a rhapsody based on Traditional Hungarian melodies & dances... This is an insult to Liszt and all the pianists who have executed this heavily & commonly abused work... Sheesh!

  • @DeliusAlkan Thank you! I wanted to say the same. This is a rhapsody, not a march. The end is terrible.

  • @gunyor111 I wonder how in the hell major recording companies convinced him to record... No wonder DG, EMI and all the others are almost dead, while smaller labels like Hyperion, Chandos, CPO or LSO become more & more powerful... This pianist seems to be a complete psychopath who doesn't what he does really play, and the most scary part is that the audiance seems thrilled by this grotesque show. He seems to be in a state of trance, like Amy Winehouse was in Belgrade before her death...

  • Was the original really that fast??

  • @sevencube3 Sorry, there is no an original Liszt album.

  • If I had a dollar for every pixel in this video I'd have 2 dollars.

  • @aCleanSnipe lol, you rock man

  • is that jason bateman at 0:58 ??

  • What a fucking audience, they try to clap... -.-

  • Lang Lang is maybe not the best pianist but he is really awesome and has one of the best technic. Listen to Horowitz playing this piece - so good

  • The first minute is the worst version of Liszt Hun Rap 2 I ever listened to. Hard to hear the different melodies, just a messy big noise. Lang reminds my Andre Rieu, with less sense for the music... a pop star unfortunately playing classical music.

  • @tubimurmeli Great! I agree! :D

  • He can plays as fast as he wants, he is fucking Lang Lang!

  • NY Times COVERAGE OF VIRTUOSOS IS RETARDED

    Did anyone read Anthony Tommasini's front page article in Sundays Arts section? He says that virtuosos are becoming a dime a dozen. He sites pieces everyone can play, while ignoring technique that's historically impossible (past and present), the alternating octaves at the end of this piece. He hails the new Chinese pianist's technique, but fails to mention that no Chinese has ever mastered the ending the way Liszt wrote it. He has a lot of nerve!

  • Stupid audience dared to clap along and was stifled by the incredulously fast playing of Lang Lang

  • My piano teacher would have whipped my hands if I was playing this fast!! Horrible but what some people do not realize is that piano is played differently in different countries and therefore, taught differently. Maybe it has something to do with the time signature, or the metric system. IDK. Jung Linn was trained at Julliard so she has been exposed to western piano playing.

  • @mellymariefl I think LL is just having fun and putting a show on, the audience loved it. He was trained in the U.S. at Curtiss, and Jung Lin was trained at Juilliard. There's a difference, basically if you are good enough to get in you go to Juilliard where they teach musicality and interpretation :) 

  • Bit fast isn't it?? Usually it takes about 10 and a half minutes to play.. he also plays Polonaise in A Flat by Chopin to fast :/

  • liszt on fast forward :D

  • people wont understand lang's own perception about music . shame . i for one enjoy more this one than jung lin's version.

  • @bfg2stream Jung LIn's performance is so overrated it's incredible: everyone says she uses no pedal (oh, she uses the pedal especially when playing octaves), she's not smooth (way to jittery and hesitant for my tastes); it's as though because she's pretty everyone just falls over! Besides, there really isn't a best performance of this; I saw Volodos play it in SF and it was incredible - not as exciting as Horowitz but technically almost perfect.

  • @Ramonedonda

    Jung Lin's HR2 is extraordinary, immensely musical and underrated. She uses little pedal, a bit more than Rach in his HR2 - in contrast to other "virtuoso" who use pedal from the first note to the last note! LOL !!!

    Volodos is extraordinary, he performs the Liszt-Horowitz HR2. Can not compare, still on the Liszt-Horowitz it is Horowitz and Volodos - Lang Lang plays it as a showpiece. On the List HR2 it is Rach, Moiseiwitsch and Jung Lin - and she is pretty :-)))

  • What a clown...

    Too fast, no emotion, no feeling for the heart of Liszt's masterpiece.

    He is completely spoiling it.

    Better try Arcady Volodos' awesome interpretation, the best I heard so far:

    youtube.com/watch?v=HKDHeaDnZF­w&feature=feedlik

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • No no No no y mil veces No! 

  • Va a los gomazos XD

  • nah this is abit too fast, im sorry lang i dont like it.

  • At 3:34, that lady was probably thinking - Wow, he stopped a moment from Bang Banging- and that poor naive woman from 4:16 did not take her medicines.

  • I see a lot of you who say its WAY too fast. Remember that we all have unique interpretations of music. He took the piece and made it his own. Please don't say it is too fast or too slow simply because the original was different. I personally like the slower version as well, but I appreciate that he attempted to make it unique.

  • why in the world do they start clapping?!?! :D

  • Now listen to Rachmaninoff play this.

  • idiotic and ignorant playing would appeal to the donkeys in the audience

  • SLOW DOWN

  • Of course he is a great pianist. I feel a little bit sad that this piece is just being used for a show where non-musician people take it as a banal piece played in a bar or somewhere. It is not deep art, more like a show business. He is a superb virtuoso but i have a bad feeling when I listen to this. Sad. But this is my opinion of course..

  • @JaakSikk That is a strange way of looking at it. I hadn't thought of that. It gave me a strange feeling as well, but part of me is just glad that some people out there appreciate the classics and that it is getting out there. I fear that if we do not share these masterpieces with more people, our generation will let the number of people who enjoy and treasure its elegance die down. Keep the music going! I do wish that something this special were treated as such and played somewhere else.

  • its a

    steinway model d

  • He wasnt playing the piano HE was PLAYING WITH the piano

  • He has a better rendition on youtube, but if you keep listening to this gets good.

  • :23 guy on the bottom, face of total dissapointment

  • total crap !

  • too fast !

  • Did anyone see the French bigots dissing American classical musicians on ABC's Nightline last Friday? When the reporter asked them which American classical musicians thay listen to, they laughed at the idea. They have a lot of nerve.

    Anyone who doesn't know about the scams that Europeans use to stop Americans from making classical recordings, needs to read the blog on Richard Kastle's website that explains how bigots rigged things against the USA in the recording industry.

  • @6347285 The French have classical musicians? who's any good? can't think of one, LOL

  • @6347285 I think they were just laughing at Richard Kastle... There's a big difference.

  • @MrPeterJohnston They play the violin and cello. They were laughing at all Americans, especially string players, who were screwed when Brandson sold Virgin to European bigots (EMI) who closed the American classical offices. The bigots were like Nazi's who viewed USA performers as Jews. Kastle's hit record Streetwise meant that more USA artists were about to be signed. They clensed the Americans from the label, and re-wrote the company bio as if the Americans never existed. USA should ban them!

  • @6347285 Okay... maybe that's true about Virgin - I don't know, but I'll take your word for it.

    Although Cleansing Kastle from the label may have been a good thing. The guy's a hack who is desperately clawing to fame by spouting lies about other famous pianists (most of them dead). The guy doesn't deserve to be on a CD.

    And hey - there's politics like this all around you. Sure it might suck - but what would the world be without bigots, and charlatans? Boring...

  • @MrPeterJohnston Your country, Australia, produced one recording act who recorded this piece. Leslie Howard was a dishonest pianist who couldn't play Liszt. He cheated like the other Europeans. The American plays Liszt masterfully. Only a bigot would refer to the first recording act who could actually play the alternating octaves at the end as a hack. The Europeans and Australians are the hacks, not the American.

    Your country also gave us Rupert Murdock. Take him back!

  • @6347285 OKAY... First of all let me correct you. Leslie Howard is a great Liszt pianist who didn't cheat anyone - so don't DARE diss Leslie Howard. Richard Kastles main claim to fame is that he can play 30 seconds or repertoire great, which is sad because he can't actually. He jams down the pedal and completely wrecks the harmony.

    And I NEVER said the americans were hacks - just Richard Kastle - so if you're going to quote me - get it RIGHT!

    And I reside in Australia, but I'm not Australian

  • @6347285 If you're one of those Richard Kastle fanboys like MikeCaffey, or Juri Koll... or another one of those idiots who seem to think Richard Kastle is a brilliant piano player - then you need to either seriously wake up, or seek professional help. Kastle has based his reputation on trying to denegrade other pianists. The man is not a genius, nor is he even good.

    There are some really great American Pianists but there's not enough room to list them here.

  • @6347285 but if you're going to try to correct me, and tell me Richard Kastle is a brilliant piano player - a man who outright tries to de-fame other piano players - then he seriously needs a kick in the head and so do you.

    I've studied classical piano for 17 years, and I can spot a hack or a cheat very easily by myself.

    The Europeans and the Australians are not hacks - Richard Kastle is. As for the rest of American pianists, I have no problems with them.

    And what are we to do with Murdoch?

  • @MrPeterJohnston

    Murdock's a crook.

  • @yung4evr Maybe... I didn't say he wasn't.

    And it's spelt 'Murdoch'... 

  • @6347285 Hmmm... I am perplexed by your comments. There are plenty of excellent American pianists who have had great success in Europe and who have recorded extensively. These include, but are certainly not limited to: Byron Janis, Earl Wilde, Garrick Ohlsson (who, by the way, won the Chopin competition in 1971), Van Cliburn (1958 Tchaikovsky Competition Gold Medalist), Agustin Anievas (phenominal Chopin specialist) Eugene Istomin etc... etc...

  • Comment removed

  • @Frozentoes1 Your list is disingenuous, four are dead, one is retired, and the other started his career in 1971. The problem with Europeans rigging the recording industry against American artists started in the 1990's.

    Name some American pianists who began recording careers after 1990, and are welcomed in Europe. I bet you can't, because Americans were ceansed from the industry.

    The Grammy Awards removed classical awards from the show. Classical recordings are a scam. Its a fact.

  • Comment removed

  • @6347285 I am glad you made your point and brought this up. Too many so-so European, Russian and Chinese pianists. I have boycotted clasical piano concerts on the East Coast (New York, Boston, DC), not attending any concerts until I see Argerich, Jung Lin, Ohlsson and Perahia on the stage!

  • @Frozentoes1 Is there anything that Cliburn played that sounded less than magnificent? I can't think on one performance that was below anything other than amazing. I was lucky enough to see him once and shake his hand afterward - what paws the guy had! - and he was gracious and a gentleman. Can't ask for more than that.

  • @6347285 Chopin and Liszt both ended up in France and found inspiration there, so of course they know what they're talking about

  • @6347285 No one gives a shit. There are NO great classical 'american' composers, and Richard Castle is an arrogant asshole. Everyone in the classical community on youtube knows that. So shut the fuck up.

    My comment on video: LOL at all the people in the comments saying "Lang Lang's rendition of this Liszt piece is soo bad.." Who says this is his final rendition? He tours and plays this piece probably hundreds of times a year. If you want to hear his 'rendition', listen to his official recording!

  • Comment removed

  • @blackcuve Wrong. Richard Kastle is a great American composer. He proves it with his new symphony on YouTube (Symphony Venezia). You can watch him play the opening on the piano while looking at the score.

    The "classical community on YouTube" is not reality. The comment pages are patrolled by European bigots like you who trash Americans. Record sales determine success. There are only 4 classical piansts with albums on Billboard: Lang, Kissin, Perriah and Kastle. Look it up.

    Go team USA!

  • Why so fast???

  • Once, I told LL was becaming a second Liberace. There he is, performing to a weird audience, on a white piano.... Pure fireworks. I don't like him.

  • He is worse than Maxim, who is worse than Tom and Jerry.

  • @nbharakey nobody is worse than maxim, that's impossible

  • 4:10 the people try to clap along but cant

  • @teg999 lol that's a huge fail

  • if you really want to know how Liszt's Hungarian rhapsody is supposed to sound, why don't you listen to and analyze performances by Hungarian pianists like Cziffra or Gyorgy Adam?

  • @LWPLICM This is NOT the Liszt Hungarian Rhapsody 2, this is Horowitz transcription (arrangement) of the Liszt original, can not compare LL's performance to Cziffra's, they are different pieces.

    Cziffra plays the Liszt HR2 and he is extraordinary, of course. Another extraordinary performance is that of Jung Lin, also the versions by Rachmaninoff and Benno Moiseiwitsch are surreal, take a listen :-))

  • That camera was made in China...

  • Applause !! (((((((((

  • It's Lang Lang for the Liszt-Horowitz and Jung Lin for the Liszt HR2, PURE MAGIC :)

    Oh, and Maksim's version is an insult to Liszt !!!

  • @36beachbum idiot...

  • @Artingence I like Lang Lang on this, Jung Lin's is the best Liszt HR2 it's magical! and Maksim's version is an insult to Liszt, your boy is bad and shouldn't try to play a piece way beyond his ability! lol

  • cmon, Marc Andre Hamelin is the best HR2 player

  • Wy did this music must be destroyed ??

  • Comment removed

  • Aberrante...

  • He's just giving a show you idiots this is not a professional classical audience

  • what´s wrong with him?

    bathroom emergency?

    he can play the Hungarian Rhpasody at the speed he wants AT HOME, but not for the public. Very bad, shameful, what a sarcasm attitude.

  • AMERICAN Richard Kastle proved that American superiority reigns in classical music as well as the usual stuff, keeing the world safe from terrorists. His CD out sold the current RUSSIAN and CANADIAN pianists. CHINESE Lang has great press and sales, but he plays the easier version. It doesn't count. Kastle plays this piece with style and extravagance.

    FACT: The USA produced the first recording artist in history who could play the octave ending without diluting the technique.

    GO TEAM USA!

  • this is idiotic playing..

  • Lang Lang!!!

    I love your story you first love and connection to the piano was come to life by Tom & Jerry - Cat Concerto.

    But even you know you had to play it slower, though i love it because this song gives you strenght!

    Annyhow Groeten uit Holland!

    Thumbs up so he maybe see this!

  • This interpretation makes me so damn mad at him for being such a terribly overacting "musician"... This guy is not playing Liszt, he is slapping him in the face repeatedly. All that in absolutely ridiculous gestures.

    Lang Lang, why are you popular? Why can't people see what music really is?

  • either he totally misunderstood the piece or he has no brains to understand the piece.....

    

  • @arfurlife: No, I don't dislike this because of his tempo.

    1)his pedaling is so wrong it's beyond imaging, it's very rough and unever.

    2)he doesn't choose a CONSISTENT TEMPO, I'm all for playing a piece faster or slower, but when parts are fastened and parts are slowed randomly, well it sounds bad .

    3)Dynamics are terrible, almost everything sounds ff, nothing is pp.

    conclusion: Lang Lang *can* be a good pianist, but not here, because this is so bad.

  • Lang Lang, general inaccuracy and amateur dramatics do not make you a good pianist...

  • I'm pretty sure Liszt would back hand Lang Lang if he heard this...

  • Oh my god his hands.... >.>

  • this is bad.... this isn´t how Liszt imagined , and that´s an offense to me... he could do it better

  • well, here's your proof that faster isn't always better.

  • lots of improve... that's cool.. i guess..I've seen LL in concert.. Prokofiev's 4rth concerti ...least this time he into the music... whether i liked it or not.

  • Comment removed

  • Stuff those who thinks Lang Lang's interpretation is bad, they're just jealous cause they don't have skill to play like this

  • soulless interpretation ever

  • I cannot believe so many people dislike this version. 807!! maybe its because its so unusual and original. His touch and dynamics are incredible and I think Liszt himself would have known greatness when he heard it here. Another example of the shocking elitist snobbery and jealousy in the piano circles. You cannot fake this music and Lang lang clearly is enjoying himself imensly...the crowd liked it too...and I liked it. Fabulous.

  • Stop flaming Lang Lang about his tempo! He can choose the tempo that he wants to play at >:O That just means that he's pro enough to play faster than most other people...

  • @IMASIANSNIPA

    However, a great pianist also follows the tempo that the composer set, and i haven´t read any "rubato"...

  • @TheBirlanca I know, I don't really enjoy Lang Lang's playing style...but I'd rather think about how pro he is just because he can even play it at that tempo...some prefer skills alone vs. music in respect of the composer (I agree with this more than skills)

  • Butchered Franz Liszt. Must be the conjured up emotion. Nothing against Lang Lang.

    But the soul of Hungary is found elsewhere.

  • in the right tempo it's about 12:10 long...here it's 7:22!!!waaaaaaaaaaaaay too fast!!!i mean...speed is not what makes a piece like that sound impressive...technice and emotions(even in such a "bubbly" sound)is what make it a masterpiece...!he may have the technice...but he doesn't have the abillity to understand liszt!!!

  • bad intro, some parts too fast, rest was okay

  • awesome but too fast

  • when you can play you play it the way YOU want :P

  • I hate it, I like much more touched by jung lin.

    He plays too fast

  • The intro was to fast,he needs to calm down!! Or else he turns this beautiful piece into CRAP!!!!

  • If anything, Lang Lang's theatrics in playing is definitely an (bad) attempt to copy Liszt's stage-presence.

  • @goodguysdoll I may be wrong on some levels, but to say that Liszt NEVER did this is also wrong. Sure, he had great respect for Mozart, Handel, Bach, Beethoven, etc. - but he was widely known both for his ability to emotionally reproduce a piece to a T (as in, perfectly) and ALSO to embellish, improvise, and add things to a piece.

    I also didn't say Lang Lang was any good. I didn't say Liszt would ever play anything like Lang Lang. I personally hate this rendition. But I'm not completely wrong.

  • stupid blond just staring into space at 3:34. And i can't believe the stupid audience starts clapping to the beat in the middle of the piece.

  • it is really too fast ... it lost some kind of magic in this piece.

  • Lang lang's Hungarian Rhapsody is different to Horowitz' transcription, and even more different than Liszt's original, could someone maybe tell me where are these versions originate from/relate to eachother?

  • For better or